Wednesday, June 17, 2026
Home Blog Page 482

Washington Free Beacon: Why is Renewable Energy Alaska Project demanding Chugach Electric fork over all of its customers’ data?

By MEGHAN BLONDER | WASHINGTON FREE BEACON

A green energy advocacy group in Alaska is demanding a local utility provider fork over its consumers’ private energy consumption data. The group wants to use that data to craft a new pricing plan that could penalize those who exceed a certain level of energy consumption, says a report from the Washington Free Beacon.

Renewable Energy Alaska Project (REAP), an Anchorage-based nonprofit that works to secure “Alaska’s clean energy future,” petitioned state regulators last month in an attempt to compel the Chugach Electric Association to provide each of its customers’ monthly energy consumption data.

REAP says it needs that data to design a rate structure that would compel customers to use less natural gas—by charging them more once they surpass certain energy consumption thresholds, the Free Beacon reports.

Chugach, Alaska’s largest electric utility, is refusing to hand over the data, citing privacy concerns. But if REAP convinces Alaska’s regulatory commission to rule in its favor, the company won’t have a say. Such a decision would effectively force Chugach to give the green energy group the actual electricity consumption habits of virtually every resident and business in Anchorage.

REAP Executive Director Chris Rose told the publication, “We don’t want the data to leak out. We respect the privacy concerns of individual customers. “But we need that data in order to develop rate design.”

REAP submitted a motion to Alaska’s regulatory commission that called the utility company’s privacy concerns “exaggerated.”

Read more of this news report at the Washington Free Beacon.

Dan Sullivan: National security bill strengthens our country’s withered defense base

By U.S. SEN. DAN SULLIVAN

This weekend, I traveled home to give my annual address to the Legislature on key issues we’re facing in D.C. that impact our great state. I talked about how the Biden administration continues the attack on Alaska’s economy and access to our lands, with 56 executive orders and actions levied against our state. I’m fighting this war on our state every day.

I also talked about the weakness shown by this administration on national security. Each year since taking office, President Biden’s proposes military budget cuts that shrink the Army, the Navy, and the Marine Corps. In next year’s budget, President Biden will bring the United States below 3% of GDP on military spending, which has only happened a handful of times in the past 80 years. Our military has also never faced such a serious recruiting crisis in its history, and yet, many Biden administration Department of Defense officials focus on woke and social issues that have nothing to do with military readiness and lethality.

This administration’s unserious approach to national security has wide-ranging consequences, including America’s withered defense industrial base—our ability to produce weapons and defend our nation. This vital capacity is a shadow of its former self. This weakness and atrophied defense base couldn’t come at a worse time. We are in the midst of one of the most dangerous times since World War II—a new era of authoritarian aggression. Dictators in China, Russia, Iran and North Korea are on the march, threatening their democratic neighbors, and increasingly working together across the globe to undermine America’s national security and that of our allies. Just this week, we saw reports that the North Korean dictator has shipped 3 million artillery shells to the Putin regime to help him in his brutal invasion of Ukraine.

In recognition of the threats our country faces, I voted earlier this month to advance national security legislation that, first and foremost, strengthens our country’s industrial base. We cannot wait until the bullets start flying to start building up our industrial base. We have to be proactive.

I’ll give you one example: America’s nuclear-powered submarine fleet is one of our greatest asymmetric advantages over China. One of the things that keeps the dictator Xi Jinping up at night is America’s submarine capacity. Yet, 37% of our attack submarine fleet—about 18 subs—is currently in maintenance, or idle and awaiting maintenance. They’re just sitting there because we don’t have the industrial capacity to maintain our submarine base. 

The Senate national security supplemental bill provides $3 billion to build up our submarine capacity. Once this is enacted, it will unlock another $3 billion paid for by our ally, Australia. That is over $6 billion invested in our industrial base for submarines.

But that’s not all. This bill also provides billions of dollars to produce 155-millimeter artillery shells, counter-UAS systems, Patriots, GMLRS, Javelins, Harpoons, Tomahawks, HARMs, TOW missiles—all built by Americans for America’s defense. 

Sixty percent of this bill—over $50 billion—goes directly to manufacturing lines and our own industrial capacity manned by hard-working Americans who are producing weapons and ammunition stocks for the U.S. military and, yes, for our allies—Israel, Taiwan, and Ukraine—to purchase, all of whom are facing existential threats.

The United States has never been forced into a war because we were too prepared or too strong. On the other hand, when we’ve been unprepared, there have severe consequences, including the unnecessary loss of tens of thousands of American service members. We would be wise to learn from these difficult lessons in our country’s history, and act to prepare for a conflict before one breaks out.

But our national security goes beyond just weapons manufacturing. We also need to address the catastrophe that has engulfed our southern border as a result of the Biden administration’s willful open border policies. I hammer this issue every chance I get, including in my speech to the Legislature last week. It is an unprecedented disaster.

Fentanyl is pouring in and making its way up to our state over four thousand miles away. President Biden is on track to hit over 10 million illegals entering our country during his tenure. Alaskans and Americans are dying because of President Biden’s dereliction of duty.

My colleague, Republican Senator James Lankford of Oklahoma, worked on a bill to address border security. However, because he was negotiating against a Democratic Senate Majority and a Democratic White House, the bill just did not go far enough, and I opposed it. How can you trust the same administration that, from day one, deliberately opened the southern border to suddenly enforce new immigration laws? Make no mistake: President Biden could act on our wide-open border at any time. He chooses not to.

I am convinced it will take a new president to seriously address the border crisis, which is one of many crucial reasons why I endorsed Donald Trump.

President Trump, working with a Republican Senate, demonstrated during his term that a great country like the United States is fully capable of doing two very important things at once: securing our border and reinvigorating our defense industrial base. The world was a safer place when America was strong and equipped.

The national security supplemental bill is now being reworked in the House. I believe this bill could be better. I had an amendment in the Senate version to remove direct budget support for Ukraine, which I strongly believe should be the responsibility of our European allies.

Unfortunately, it never got a vote in the Senate. I have encouraged House Republicans to improve the bill with these kinds of provisions, and advance this overdue investment in our own military industrial base.

Alaskans have a unique appreciation of the importance of investing in our military and national security. Our state is on the frontline of defense for the entire country. More than any other state in the Union, Alaska has a critical role to play during these dangerous times. Our lethal military assets are a huge source of American power. These assets must be ready to defend our country and our allies.

Authoritarian dictators in Tehran, Beijing, and Moscow are watching us. Deterrence is not divisible. You can’t show weakness in one part of the world, and strength in another, without jeopardizing America’s security and that of our allies. President Biden’s botched withdrawal from Afghanistan demonstrated this fact.

The world—and the American people—are not safer when our president shows weakness or when America retreats from its leadership role in the world. 

Throughout my time in the Senate, I have been guided by President Ronald Reagan’s time-tested principle, “peace through strength.” I believe that nothing would do more to chill the tyrannical aims of Putin and Xi than for Republicans and Democrats to come together on a robust, serious investment in our capacity to produce weapons—everything from nuclear-powered submarines to 155mm howitzer rounds—defend our country, and help our allies.

Now is the time act.

Sen. Dan Sullivan, a Republican, has represented Alaska in the U.S. Senate since he was first elected in 2014. He sits on the Senate Armed Services Committee. He recently retired from the Marine Corps Reserve after 30 years of service.

Will Murkowski leave the Republican Party? She hints that it’s an option

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, asked by a CNN reporter if she would consider changing her party affiliation to “independent,” said that possibility it is not off the table. It just depends on what direction the Republican Party takes.

Murkowski was being interviewed about the news of Sen. Mitch McConnell stepping down as Senate Minority Leader in November.

“It has Republicans reflecting on what happens to the party in the months ahead and has some weighing whether they can fit into a GOP that is more modeled after Trump than the Reagan-Republicanism McConnell embodies,” the Fox News story says.

“I wonder that every day,” Murkowski said to CNN.

Asked if she’d be open to becoming an independent, Murkowski said, “That’s not something I am prepared to discuss in terms of where I am, but I am watching very carefully what we are seeing with the party and the party’s choices and with where Republicans are leaning. And, I am clearly not one who is following the Trump path at all. So again, it is not about Lisa Murkowski. It is like what is our party right now?”

The direction the Republican Party seems to be taking in Alaska is in favor of Trump for president, according to numerous polls. In 2020, Trump won Alaska with 53% of the general election vote; Biden received 43%. This year, the pattern appears to be repeating, and Murkowski is not only vocal in her disapproval of Trump, she voted to impeach Trump in 2021.

That means that Murkowski, even with her 22 years of seniority, likely won’t be in line to become the Senate Minority Leader, because whoever is chosen by the members may need to have a good relationship with Donald Trump, should he be elected in November. McConnell, the longest-serving Senate leader in U.S. history, has refused to endorse Trump for president, and has not spoken to the former president since Jan. 6, 2021, the day the Capitol was overrun with protesters.

Murkowski is fifth in seniority among Republicans in the Senate, not counting McConnell. She comes after Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, Michael Crapo of Idaho, and John Cornyn of Texas. But neither Collins or Murkowski would be contenders for Minority Leader due to their liberal records. Chuck Grassley is also out because he is 90 years old and will be nearly 91 in November.

Although Sen. Rand Paul is mentioned by some as a good option, he comes from Kentucky, as does McConnell, which may make some senators balk at giving Kentucky so much power. Others mentioned include John Barrasso of Wyoming, John Cornyn of Texas, John Thune of South Dakota and Rick Scott of Florida.

Rick Whitbeck: Energy was front and center at CPAC

By RICK WHITBECK | POWER THE FUTURE

Last week, I traveled to Washington D.C. to attend the annual CPAC (Conservative Political Action Conference) event. Founded in 1974, this gathering of thousands of like-minded people celebrated its 50th anniversary with lots of red, white and blue, a solid group of speakers, hundreds of media members and seemingly as many social media influencers. 

My main role at CPAC was to help launch a four-part set of videos from my organization, Power The Future. Each one highlighted the importance of energy in the 2024 political campaigns. In addition, I hosted the Power The Future booth in the massive exhibit hall at the Gaylord National Resort and Convention Center.  In-between meeting with conference-goers and listening to speakers, I visited “Radio Row” multiple times daily, where media personalities jockeyed for guests throughout the event.  

The mood at CPAC was one of unwavering patriotism, with attendees coming from every corner of America and around the globe.  I talked with people from Hungary, Australia, the UK, Egypt, Argentina, El Salvador, New Zealand, Canada and Mexico.  Each of them there to help further conservative principles of limited government and individual responsibility, while pushing back on a globalist agenda designed to limit freedoms.  In fact, that was CPAC 2024’s theme, “Where Globalism Goes to Die.”

The other underlying theme was energy, which was fantastic to see as an everyday advocate for America’s energy potential. From the opening speaker of the event, Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida, declaring “America’s best energy days are ahead of us”, to President Trump’s declaration that “Biden’s energy assault will end on January 20th, 2025”, speaker after speaker noted the need to reverse the weakening of American energy on the international stage that we’ve seen under this administration.

Energy underpins every facet of daily life, from agriculture to transportation, from our utilities and the gas we put in our vehicles to the costs we incur at shops around Alaska to the price we pay for service providers around the world. As America has seen Joe Biden weaken our domestic energy status and output, we’ve seen massive inflation and our dollar shrinking like we haven’t witnessed in decades.

Now that I’m home, I’ll bring the energy and patriotism found at CPAC back to Alaska, fighting like never before for Alaskans to have our best resource development days ahead of us. From the North Slope to Prince of Wales Island, projects and opportunities to advance a domestic energy supply chain lie under our feet and beneath the Earth’s crust. 

It is our job to fight together to demand an opportunity to safely and responsibly extract those riches. Together, we can build a better Alaska, fight back against the narrative that traditional energy is evil, or that somehow we should live without oil, gas, coal and sacrifice the tens of thousands of jobs in our state dependent on their development.

Our future will be determined by being active and vocal, pushing back against the agenda of well-funded, wrong-on-so-many-levels activists and ideologues who want to lay waste to America. Don’t let them win.

Energy is definitely on the ballot in 2024. You can watch our videos here, and join us in the fight for Alaska, America and families across the nation.

Rick Whitbeck is the Alaska State Director for Power The Future, a national nonprofit organization that advocates for American energy jobs and fights back against economy-killing and family-destroying environmental extremism. Contact him at [email protected] and follow him on X (formerly Twitter) @PTFAlaska.

Birds of a feather: Rep. Swalwell campaigned for Peltola in Alaska; now he’s in trouble over using campaign cash to attend Super Bowl

In September, California Rep. Eric Swalwell, a foe of Alaska’s energy economy, came north to Alaska to be a special guest at Rep. Mary Peltola’s fundraiser in Juneau. That was after he had been investigated by the House Ethics Committee for his liaison with Fang-Fang, a suspected Chinese spy.

Now, Swalwell is in trouble again, for running up a tab at the Super Bowl with his campaign account.

Swalwell is known for using his campaign war chest as a “personal piggy bank,” says the American Accountability Foundation, a watchdog group. Swalwell spent campaign funds at the Super Bowl and paid $50,000 to NFL teams for “event tickets,” according to a report from the Washington Free Beacon.

“Swalwell’s attendance raises questions about how a congressman known for facing financial struggles was able to afford tickets that cost at least $10,000 apiece. It could also fuel complaints that Swalwell has used campaign money to fund an elaborate lifestyle. In 2021, a conservative watchdog group accused Swalwell of illegally using campaign funds for personal expenses, citing $20,000 in payments for luxury hotel stays. In December, Swalwell’s campaign paid $1,700 for his stay at the Burj al Arab, a five-star hotel in Dubai,” the Free Beacon reported.

Swalwell donated $3,000 to Peltola’s campaign in the fall of 2023, through his leadership political action committee, Remedy PAC, which has also donated to Rep. Adam Schiff’s run for Senate. Schiff is best known for being head of the impeachment of former President Donald Trump.

In the past, Swalwell has been hit with complaints for converting campaign money into gift cards. In 2021, his Federal Elections Commission report showed “anomalies in campaign expenditures that raise troubling questions as to whether campaign disbursements went towards personal use or to the direct benefit of family members,” the watchdog group said in its complaint.

“These anomalies include what appears to be preloading of campaign dollars to a Starbucks account and/or gift cards, paying a family member over $17,000 for ‘childcare’, attending the musical Beach Blanket Babylon, and personal medical testing for COVID-19, among others,” the complaint said.

Read the report at the Washington Free Beacon.

Swalwell says his trip to the Super Bowl was a fundraiser for other Democrats, which is why he bought so many tickets.

Mayor to reveal details of new library downtown

25

A new municpality-run library will be soon added to the list of Anchorage libraries. This one will be located in the old City Hall building in downtown Anchorage and will be the sixth general-purpose public library in Anchorage. It won’t take up the whole building, and the library isn’t envisioned as a large one, like the Loussac Library in Midtown.

It is a project years in the making, most recently getting a boost from former Anchorage library director Judy Eledge, who made it a priority before she left the library in 2023, after being hounded by reporting on her by the Anchorage Daily News. The money came from an endowment that has been sitting in the accounts of the Anchorage Library Foundation, originally made by Janet and John Goetz, longtime downtown residents who died many years ago and bequeathed their estate to the foundation with instructions that it would be used to recreate a downtown library. The original gift of over a half million dollars has grown over the years and is now said to be in the millions of dollars.

But none of the administrations before Bronson were able to get the project done for various reasons.

On Thursday, Mayor Dave Bronson will announce the plans to move forward, which involve using some portion of the historic building at 524 W. 4th Ave., not far from where the old downtown library was located before it was torn down to make way for the Egan Convention Center.

According to the foundation’s planning documents for the library, it will not be a location rich in actual books, but it will be a flexible space that has some books and newspapers, and lots of flexible room for other activities.

“While a small collection of popular books and DVDs will be available for check-out and magazines and newspapers will be available for browsing, staff will be much more focused on creating and curating experiences and offering services to customers. Staff will also go into the community to develop partnerships with local businesses and service providers to bring timely and relevant programs into the library. For instance, the Library might partner with a legal services or tax preparation group to offer classes in those areas, or host a Dena’ina beading workshop or a foreign film night. Some library events might not even happen at the library—staff will take advantage of the surrounding museums, restaurants, theaters and galleries to expand the size and type of programs the library is able to offer,” the planning document says.

Libraries have become de facto daytime warming shelters for Anchorage homeless and during previous mayoral administrations were venues for controversial events such as Drag Queen Story Hour for children. Parents are concerned about the books that culture-warrior librarians seem to be pushing on children, with literature that emphasizes gender identity matters that many feel are not appropriate for children. Libraries have, in fact, become a front of the culture war being waged by leftists.

These are challenges that are not exclusive to Anchorage but seen in cities around the country, where not everyone feels that the library is a safe and welcoming place. During the Bronson administration, there has been some effort to restore the use of libraries to their intended use, although the current Loussac Library has once again become a magnet for drug users and other miscreants who use the facilities for various illegal activities.

Two years ago, a woman returning books at the Loussac Library suffered permanent injuries after being attacked by a knife-wielding stranger, adding to the concern that libraries are changing in America.

Read more about the foundation’s concept for the downtown library.

Crowd shouts ‘Cowards!’ but Anchorage Assembly takes pass on Gaza cease fire resolution

Anchorage Assembly members decided to take a pass on a resolution calling for Alaska’s congressional delegation to call for a cease fire in Gaza. About 30 people at the regular Assembly meeting on Tuesday evening held signs in front of them expressing their views on the war between Hamas and Israel, which Hamas appears to be losing badly, even with the help of Iran.

The resolution had been brought to the agenda by Karen Bronga, George Martinez, and Felix Rivera. It was member Meg Zaletel who made the motion to postpone, seconded by member Daniel Volland.

As the Assembly voted 8-4 to postpone the item, the activists in the audience jeered and could be heard yelling, “Cowards!”

Michael Patterson, a communist and member of the Party for Socialism and Liberation, stood up and yelled, “Garbage! Absolute garbage! Cowards, absolute cowards!”

Assembly Chairman Chris Constant called for security to remove Patterson, and then paused the meeting for the Assembly’s dinner break, while the crowd continued to shout its disapproval.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell to step aside

In a speech on the U.S. Senate floor on Wednesday, Republican Minority Leader Mitch McConnell said he will step down from the role of leading the Senate Republicans in November. He has the record of the longest serving Senate party leader. McConnell gave a copy of his prepared remarks to AP, which first reported the news.

“One of life’s most underappreciated talents is to know when it’s time to move on to life’s next chapter,” McConnell said. “So I stand before you today … to say that this will be my last term as Republican leader of the Senate.

“If you would have told me 40 years later that I would stand before you as the longest serving Senate leader in American history, frankly, I would have thought you’d lost your mind,” he said.

“I turned 82 last week and the end of my contributions are closer than I’d prefer,” he said.

McConnell will remain in office, he said, until his term ends in January of 2027.

McConnell has had a number of health challenges this past year, including small-but-visible seizures of some sort, while speaking to the media.

Borrowed money for clean energy: $125 million in federal funding pegged for 1,000 rural Alaskans

33

The Department of Energy will spend $125.1 million for five energy development projects in rural Alaska. DOE awarded the funds under its Energy Improvement in Rural or Remote Areas program, authored in large part by Sen. Lisa Murkowski as part of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act of 2021.

The math is breathtaking: For the 1,000 Alaskans served by these hydro, solar, and battery projects, the federal government is spending $125,000 per rural resident.

The program is aimed at improving “resilience, reliability, and affordability of energy systems in communities across the country with 10,000 or fewer people.”

The Alaska projects selected for funding include:

  • Chignik Hydroelectric Dam and Water Source Project led by the Lake and Peninsula Borough (Chignik Bay)—up to $7.3 million. The project will replace 100% of the community’s diesel consumption with renewable energy, and reduce energy burden.
  • Clean Energy in the Northwest Arctic led by the Northwest Arctic Borough—up to $54.8 million. This project aims to install over 4 MW of solar PV, over 7.1 MWh of battery storage systems, and approximately 850 heat pumps across the Northwest Arctic region. This project seeks to replace a 10-mile, overhead, distribution tie-line between the villages of Kobuk and Shungnak, allowing for greater interconnection in this remote region. Each of the 10 solar and battery storage projects will be owned and maintained by 11 federally recognized Alaska Native Villages, who will act as Independent Power Producers (IPP). 
  • Alaskan Tribal Energy Sovereignty led by the Tanana Chiefs Conference (Nulato, Huslia, Minto, Kaltag, Grayling, Anvik, Shageluk, Holy Cross)—up to $26.1 million. The project will strive to offset the region’s diesel consumption by 40%, which will lower energy costs and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by more than 1,550 metric tons per year over the project’s 25-year lifespan, the Department of Energy says.
  • Old Harbor Hydroelectric Project led by the Alutiiq Tribe of Old Harbor (Old Harbor)—up to $10 million. This project plans to construct a run-of-the-river hydroelectric facility with a diversion structure, pipeline, powerhouse, and electric transmission line in Old Harbor on Kodiak Island. It is anticipated that the project will be capable of generating about 3,470 MWh of energy annually and offset diesel fuel use at the local power plant by 95%, enabling a year-round reliable energy source. 
  • Thayer Creek Hydroelectric Project led by Kootznoowoo, Inc. (Angoon)—up to $26.9 million. This project encompasses an 850-kilowatt, run-of-the-river hydroelectric project that has the potential to supply three times the community’s current electricity needs, providing additional power for heating, fish processing, electric vehicle charging, and tourism. Kootznoowoo, Incorporated (KI) is the Alaska Native Village Corporation for the community of Angoon, population 357 residents. The cost per resident is $75,630.

These projects will facilitate the development of more of Alaska’s abundant hydropower resources, solar energy, battery storage systems, heat pumps, electric interconnection, and more, the Department of Energy says. More information about the awards is available on DOE’s website.

While rural Alaska is getting hydropower, the Anchorage Assembly is trying to rip out the existing Eklutna hydropower project.

Rick Whitbeck, Alaska state director of Power The Future, noted the inconsistency, saying, “Hydro that replaces higher-cost energy in rural Alaska is wonderful but the lowest cost electricity in Southcentral is somehow evil? You’d think the eco-Left could be more consistent, but logic is not their strong suit.”

To date, roughly $7.4 billion from the bipartisan infrastructure law has been announced for Alaska, with over 1,600 projects identified for funding and investment around the state. That’s $10,100 of federal funding — and much of that is federal debt — for every Alaskan. Similar results can be found across the country.

Statista, a business data website, shows that in 2023, Alaska, even with its small population of about 733,000, did better than states with far larger populations in terms of obtaining these federal infrastructure dollars:

Statistic: Funding under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law in the United States in the fiscal year of 2023, by state (in billion U.S. dollars) | Statista
Find more statistics at Statista