Friday, August 7, 2026
Home Blog Page 413

Department of Justice was wrong, says Supreme Court, as it tosses one charge against J-6er

17

The Supreme Court threw out a Department of Justice’s charge against a Pennsylvania man who entered the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021 with other protestors who were objecting to the certification of the 2020 presidential election.

In a court vote of 6-3 on Fischer v. United States, the majority agreed with former policeman Joseph Fischer that he was wrongfully charged: A crime the government charged him with was written for cases involving evidence tampering and destruction of records. Fischer did no such thing when he entered the building with other protesters. The statute in question, Section 1512(c)(2), was being improperly applied after the federal government expanded the meaning of the statute to weaponize it against Jan. 6 defendants.

The ruling could mean more than 300 other Jan. 6 defendants could see at least this one charge dropped, although others may still be pending. Fischer was originally charged with seven crimes relating to the unruliness at the Capitol.

U.S. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland released a statement downplaying the importance of the ruling: “January 6 was an unprecedented attack on the cornerstone of our system of government — the peaceful transfer of power from one administration to the next. I am disappointed by today’s decision, which limits an important federal statute that the Department has sought to use to ensure that those most responsible for that attack face appropriate consequences.”

Merrick said the “vast majority of the more than 1,400 defendants charged for their illegal actions on January 6 will not be affected by this decision. There are no cases in which the Department charged a January 6 defendant only with the offense at issue in Fischer. For the cases affected by today’s decision, the Department will take appropriate steps to comply with the Court’s ruling.”

On Friday, a fact sheet from the Department of Justice went further in defending itself:

“Today’s decision will most significantly impact a narrow band of cases: those where the only felony for which a defendant was convicted and sentenced was 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2).  In total, approximately 52 individuals have been convicted and sentenced on that charge and no other felony; of those individuals, only 27 are currently serving a sentence of incarceration—less than 2 percent of all charged cases arising from the Capitol Breach,” the Department of Justice said in an attempt to spin the decision and absolve itself of wrongfully prosecuting Americans.

The Department also explained the impact of the decision on pending cases: “Of the approximately 249 remaining cases, there are zero cases where a defendant was charged only with 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2). In other words, in every case potentially impacted by the Fischer decision, the defendant faced other criminal charges—felonies, misdemeanors, or both—for illegal conduct related to the Capitol Breach.”

Dissenting with the majority opinion was conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, along with liberal Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Agreeing with the opinion was leftist Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The case was remanded back to the D.C. Circuit Court, where the charges against Fischer may still proceed for obstructing a proceeding of Congress.

More than 750 J-6ers have already been sentenced for J-6 crimes. Nearly two-thirds of those convicted received some prison time, from a few days of intermittent jail time to 22 years — the sentence given to Proud Boys member Henry “Enrique” Tarrio, 39, of Miami.

In the 41 months since Jan. 6, 2021, more than 1,450 individuals have been charged in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the entry into the Capitol while the Senate was certifying the election. At least 500 of those are charged with felony assault of or impeding law enforcement, the Justice Department said. Jan. 6 is the largest criminal investigation in U.S. history, with the judgments coming from the D.C. District Court, where seven of the 11 judges are Democrat appointees. The Justice Department is still hunting for about 80 individuals to press charges, including the person or persons who placed bombs at the headquarters of the Republican and Democrat parties in D.C.

The SCOTUS opinion can be read at this link.

Read this Reason Magazine analysis of the decision.

Rep. Chip Roy files resolution calling for invoking 25th Amendment of Constitution to remove Biden

By BETHANY BLANKLEY | THE CENTER SQUARE

U.S. Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, filed a resolution Friday calling for the 25th Amendment of the Constitution to be invoked to remove President Joe Biden from office after his performance at the presidential debate on Thursday night. Biden appeared to have mental and physical difficulties, prompting widespread speculation and criticism in the media and among Democrats.

The resolution calls on Vice President Kamala Harris “to convene and mobilize the principal officers of the executive departments of the Cabinet to activate Section 4 of the 25th Amendment to declare President Joseph Biden incapable of executing the duties of his office and to immediately exercise powers as Acting President.” It also states Biden “has repeatedly and publicly demonstrated his inability to discharge the powers and duties of the presidency, including, among others, the powers and duties of the Commander-In-Chief.”

In a radio interview, Roy made similar arguments to those of Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, saying he doesn’t know who would replace Biden as the Democratic nominee ahead on Novembers election. Cruz says it would be former First Lady Michelle Obama.

Roy said, “Democrats have now known this for a long time,” referring to Biden’s mental and physical health. “They’ve been guilty of trying to hide it from the American people. They’ve been using him [Biden] as a puppet as a Manchurian candidate to drive their radical agenda. They’ve done that on purpose … now they saw the gig is up, that Trump could win, they were hoping they could keep the Manchurian candidate in place, they panicked. It was a controlled panic, let’s have an early debate, we’ll see how he performed. He didn’t perform. Now they have what they need to try to push him aside and end-run [Vice President] Kamala [Harris].”

Regardless of the Democrats’ problems, Roy said, “we have a constitutional duty to protect the Constitution. He’s incapable. We should force Democrats to own it and make a choice. Do you agree, do you believe he’s competent? Let’s make them choose.”

Congress proposed the 25th Amendment in 1965 after the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. All 50 states ratified it in 1967. It establishes procedures for replacing the president or vice president under certain circumstances. The first time it was invoked was in 1973 after Vice President Spiro Agnew resigned, according to the Congressional Research Service. It was again used in 1974 after President Richard Nixon resigned and when Vice President Gerald Ford, who became president, nominated Nelson Rockefeller as Vice President. It has not been used since.

Calls to invoke the 25th Amendment were made in February by multiple members of Congress after Special Counsel Robert Hur’s report cited examples of Biden’s mental lapses, describing him as an “elderly man with poor memory,” The Center Square reported.

Before that, and for three years, former White House physician for presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump, U.S. Rep. Ronny Jackson, R-Texas, repeatedly questioned Biden’s mental and physical health and called for him to be removed under the 25th Amendment, The Center Square reported.

Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah, agreed with Roy’s resolution, saying, “If the need to invoke the 25th Amendment wasn’t made abundantly clear last night, it never will be. This is dire. And exactly the kind of situation for which the 25th Amendment was written.”

U.S. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Florida, said if the Hur tapes were released, Biden’s cabinet would vote to remove him from office. She told Fox Business, “If we are able to hear that he is incompetent on those tapes,” she said the cabinet “would have to” vote to remove him. “I say that based on last night’s performance and the outcry from Democrats from various news outlets from the American people … calling for a new candidate or for him to step aside.”

At a campaign event in North Carolina on Friday, Biden said he wasn’t backing down. “I don’t walk as easy as I used to. I don’t speak as smoothly as I used to… I know how to tell the truth. I know right from wrong. I know how to do this job…I know like millions of Americans know; when you get knocked down you get back up.”

After his campaign blamed his poor performance on a cold, co-host of CBS Mornings Gayle King said, “When you have a cold there’s many things you can take for it. We didn’t know he had a cold until he stood up. A cold doesn’t force you to lose your train of thought. A cold doesn’t force you to just throw things out randomly that to many people made no sense.

“So how long do we continue to act like that we didn’t see what we just saw last night? I thought for many people, the word I keep hearing was, ‘it was very painful to watch.’”

Breaking: State Supreme Court reversed Judge Zeman on correspondence programs in Alaska

On Friday, Alaska unanimously reversed a lower court ruling that had ruled that state funding of Alaska’s correspondence school programs was unconstitutional.

Superior Court Judge Adolf Zeman said that, on its face, the correspondence school funding in Alaska was unconstitutional.

On Thursday the Supreme Court heard the arguments, and said the plaintiffs failed in their attempts to challenge the law.

“We reverse the superior court’s ruling that AS 14.03.300-.310 are facially unconstitutional. When a court rules a statute facially unconstitutional, it strikes down the statute in its entirety.5 By contrast, a court may rule a statute unconstitutional as applied to a certain set of facts, while leaving the statute in effect as applied to other scenarios. Plaintiffs face a high bar when trying to show that a statute should be ruled facially unconstitutional.”

Judge Zeman’s ruling was about to go into effect after it had been postponed from immediately being effective. He set June 30 as the effective date for his ruling, giving the Alaska Supreme Court and the State’s attorneys little time to pull together their case to defend the individualized learning that over 24,000 Alaska students use.

By not extending the stay, Zeman said that the Dunleavy Administration was not likely to win its appeal.

“Accordingly, this Court finds that a limited stay is the best solution to ensure that students, families, and school districts are protected from undue disruption and all parties are protected from unnecessary uncertainty and related harms. A limited stay until the end of the fiscal year will ensure that any correspondence allotments that were taken in reliance on AS 14.03.300-310, will be honored, while minimizing the potential for continued unfettered unconstitutional spending,” Zeman had written.

But Zeman was wrong and the Alaska Supreme Court said so in plain language in its reversal of Zeman’s ruling.

Taking a loss as an attorney for the plaintiffs was political lawyer Scott Kendall. As the court put it, “there are many constitutionally permissible uses of allotment funds. The parties all seem to agree that school districts can approve the use of allotment funds by students enrolled in correspondence study to purchase books, computers, and art supplies from private businesses. And the parties seem to agree that allotment funds can be spent on martial arts classes at a private gym and pottery lessons at an artist’s studio.”

Further, the Supreme Court said, “None of these uses of allotment funds entails a ‘direct benefit’ to a ‘religious or other private educational institution.’”

For those reasons, the Court decided unanimously to “reverse both the superior court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Alexander and its denial of the State’s motion to dismiss.”

The court decided to not rule on the issue of private school tuition and the justices complimented the filers of the amicus briefs on behalf of the correspondence students around the state.

Read the ruling here:

Governor signs budget that has $1,718 Permanent Fund dividend, extra funds for schools

On the last business day of the fiscal year, Gov. Mike Dunleavy signed the 2025 state operating and capital budgets.

The operating budget is $12.2 billion, and the capital budget is $3.5 billion line-item vetoes reduced the operating budget by $105.7 million and the capital budget by $125.3 million.

A day earlier, the governor signed Senate Bill 22 in a private, unannounced ceremony, making June 19th a paid state holiday starting next year in honor of the ending of slavery in the United States. The cost to the state of Sen. Elvi Gray-Jackson’s signature legislation is nearly $1 million a year, mostly for overtime for public safety and other workers who must work on state holidays. State employees now have 12 paid holidays and most also have three weeks of personal leave.

The FY2025 budget funds state government from July 1, 2024 through June 30, 2025.

In the budget, there’s a $1,718 Permanent Fund dividend for every eligible Alaskan.

“The framers of Alaska’s Constitution codified a strong chief executive to ensure responsible budgeting. This budget reflects their intentions. By maintaining focus and fiscal discipline, this budget increases funding where it is needed most while at the same time reducing total Unrestricted General Fund spending,” Dunleavy said. “It provides additional funding to school districts needed to address the cost of inflation and provides additional targeted funding for programs that will improve student outcomes. We also are making essential investments in energy that will lay the groundwork for more reliable and affordable energy for Alaskans for decades to come. As has been the case every year I’ve been Governor, we are ensuring our Alaska State Troopers and Village Public Safety Officers have the resources they need to protect Alaskans, and through the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation we are helping more Alaskans be able to buy their own home and find quality housing.”

Vetoes include added funds for public broadcasting, marketing money for Alaska Seafood Marketing Institute, and various other line items.

View the operating budget veto list here.

View the capital budget veto list here.

Key items in the FY2025 budget include:

Education

  • $174.6 million one-time $680 Base Student Allocation (BSA) increase
  • $7.3 million one-time Pupil Transportation increase
  • $62.8 million for School Major Maintenance, Relocations, Renovations, and Replacements 
  • $87.5 million for University of Alaska operations and deferred maintenance

Energy

  • $23.0 million for the Alaska Housing Finance Corporation Energy Efficiency Research and Energy Weatherization
  • $10.5 million for the Renewable Energy Grant Fund
  • $11.1 million to the University of Alaska Fairbanks for Alaska Railbelt Carbon Capture & Sequestration Project

Public Safety

  • $3.5 million for ten additional Village Public Safety Officer (VPSO) positions and VPSO salary increases
  • $700 thousand for investigations, outreach, and education on missing and murdered Indigenous persons 
  • $9.5 million for replacement of a patrol vessel for southeast Alaska to respond to emergencies, search and rescue operations, and enforce laws and regulations protecting Alaska coastline communities

Affordability

  • $53.2 million for Alaska Housing Finance Corporation housing programs for home buyers, owners, and renters to provide safe, quality, affordable housing
  • $2.8 million for the Alaska Addiction Rehabilitation Services residential expansion project
  • $1.5 million for the for a Denali Commission housing program

Since FY2019, budget growth has averaged 1.2 percent annually, the governor’s office said.

Click here for Office of Management and Budget FY2025 budget documents.

Biden Interior Dept. locking up 28 million acres in Alaska — more than all of ANWR. But there’s a catch.

In a move that will thrill Democrats and the environmental lobby, the Department of Interior’s final environmental impact statement on the Ambler Access road has gone against the mining project, a project that was actually guaranteed during the passage and signing of the Alaska National Interest Land Claims Act (ANILCA).

The Ambler Access Project is planned as a 211-mile, industrial-access road to reach the state’s Ambler Mining District.

ANILCA, while it established 10 new federal parks, preserves, and monuments throughout Alaska, had in it what President Jimmy Carter called the “Great Compromise,” which guaranteed access to and from the Ambler Mining District for resource development. That guarantee is found in Section 201(4) of ANILCA.

mblerThe Biden Administration, however, locked up 28 million acres of the land from oil and gas, mining, or activities that it says would threaten Alaska Natives, wildlife or any ecosystem that the Administration finds untouchable.

The decision, which is regulation-making by the Bureau of Land Management, came on the same day that the U.S. Supreme Court reversed what’s known as the “Chevron deference.” That decision said the regulatory agencies and their bureaucrats are not allowed to interpret the areas of law that are unclear. How the Chevron reversal will impact the Biden decision to lock up Ambler Mine and more than one and a half times the area of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge remains to be seen.

“Today’s double-whammy attack on Alaska’s resource development opportunities makes 65 times the Biden administration has targeted our state’s energy and economic future,” said Rick Whitbeck, Alaska state director for Power the Future. “This administration has completely kowtowed to radical environmentalists in an effort to gain favor at the ballot box.  Dismissing the fact that Congress mandated access to the Ambler Mining District is a brazen overreach of executive authority.  Placing 28 million acres – an area larger than the entire state of Tennessee – off-limits to responsible development is foolhardy, and only empowers China, Russia and other enemies of our Republic.”

The entire Alaska D.C. delegation expressed disapproval of the decision by the Interior Department.

“Nine years in federal permitting. Access to critical and strategic minerals that are essential for everything from clean energy to national security. A rare opportunity for development in rural Alaska under the highest standards, so we don’t have to import from unstable nations that have no protections for people or the environment,” said Sen. Lisa Murkowski. “Somehow, none of that mattered to the Biden administration on the Ambler project. They have ignored federal law, our national vulnerabilities, and Alaska’s strong record of responsible development, all in the name of election year politics.” 

Sen. Dan Sullivan said, “There he goes again: President Biden’s announcement on the Ambler Road is lawless, hurts Alaska’s future and jobs for our state, undermines America’s national security, and only makes our country more dependent on adversaries like Communist China for critical minerals. These minerals are critically important for our national defense, economy, and renewable energy sector. ANILCA mandates the right-of-way for this road. Career professional staff from the Obama and Trump administrations studied and then approved it after several years. Consultations with Alaskan stakeholder groups were extensive and far-reaching. But no matter, Lower 48 eco-colonialists told Joe Biden to kill the road, and he obeyed. Sanctioning Alaska more than terrorist states, like Iran and Venezuela, and adversaries, like China, is now commonplace policy for the Biden administration. But I’m fighting back. I was able to get strong bipartisan support for my amendment in this year’s NDAA [Defense Authorization Act] that mandates this road and ensures the destiny of this project is controlled by Alaskans.”

Even Democrat Rep. Mary Peltola issues a few words, although she was wishy-washy: “All too often, promises made to Alaska Natives by Congress haven’t been kept; this decision is in contradiction to ANILCA,” Peltola said. “There’s a path forward where local buy-in for this project is real and sustainable. As we continue to work through NDAA, we will seek to affirm permanent private road access that will make these resources available in a way that works for stakeholders in the area.”

The minerals and metals within the Ambler District are crucial to economic and national security, said Murkowski and Sullivan.

  • Imports of copper have risen sharply in recent years. Numerous forecasts indicate there will be a substantial supply gap for copper in the years ahead. The Biden administration has stalled or rejected numerous copper projects across the nation, adding to future supply woes, they pointed out.
  • The dominant supplier of cobalt is the Democratic Republic of the Congo, with which the Biden Administration has signed an agreement to allow the continued use of children as labor, and where horrific worker and environmental conditions exist. The Chinese government controls or owns most of the mines in the DRC and has in the past weaponized the mines by cutting off the exports of rare earth minerals to the United States.

But Biden issued a statement doubling down on his decision to harm Alaska: “Today, my Administration is stopping a 211-mile road from carving up a pristine area that Alaska Native communities rely on, in addition to steps we are taking to maintain protections on 28 million acres in Alaska from mining and drilling,” Biden said in a statement on the social media platform X. “These natural wonders demand our protection.”

Supreme Court rules in favor of local homeless encampment laws and overturns the vast regulatory authority of feds in ‘Chevron doctrine’ decision

Two major Supreme Court decisions were issued on Friday morning that impact Alaska.

In the first, the court ruled that the city of Grant Pass, Oregon (and others) can enforce a ban on public squatting on city properties, and that such bans do not constitute “cruel and unusual punishment.”

The court majority opinion, written by Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, said that the enforcement of laws regulating camping on public property is “commonplace” and not barred by the Eighth Amendment.

Gorsuch wrote that while homelessness is a complex issue, the city’s limited fines for first-time offenders, the ability to trespass repeat offenders from public parks, and a maximum of 30 days in jail for violators are punishments that don’t bring “terror, pain or disgrace.”

As is often the case, the three liberal women on the court dissented.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor called sleeping a “biological necessity, not a crime,” and wrote that for people with no homes, the city’s laws punish them for the status of being homeless. “That is unconscionable and unconstitutional,” she wrote. She was joined in her dissent by Justices Elena Kana and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

But the conservatives on the court cited an amicus brief from liberal California Gov. Gavin Newsom, and said that “policymakers need access to the full panoply of tools in the policy toolbox,” and need latitude to work through the complicated issues of homelessness.

The high court said that previous rulings by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in a Boise, Idaho case and in the Grants Pass case, which had limited what municipalities could do in terms of banning public encampments on streets, parks, and sidewalks, may have actually increased the homelessness problem by taking away one important tool for cities that are responding to the growing crises in homelessness.

“In Portland, for example, residents report some unsheltered persons ‘often return within days’ of an encampment’s clearing,” Gorsuch wrote. And there wasn’t anything Portland could do about it, due to the Ninth Circuit ruling.

Anchorage had signed onto the lawsuit with several other cities in support of Grants Pass. That brief is at this link.

In a second case that impacts Alaska, the Supreme Court overturned what is known as the “Chevron doctrine.”

In a 1984 decision, Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, the Supreme Court had said that courts should defer to an agency’s “reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute.” That gave license to bureaucrats to interpret laws their own way.

Now, in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the Supreme Court has held that courts may not grant those vast powers of interpretation to agencies, simply because a law is ambiguous.

Critics of that Chevron ruling say it gives unelected federal bureaucrats too much power in writing regulations. Regulatory overreach has stopped or slowed down projects in Alaska such as Willow and this ruling may even impact EPA decisions on Pebble Project and the Ambler Road to the proposed mining areas.

The case that ended up overturning Chevron Deference Doctrine involved a 2020 federal regulation that requires owners of fishing vessels in the Atlantic herring fishery to pay for federal onboard monitors while they’re at sea, which can cost more than $700 a day per vessel.

The National Marine Fisheries Service had created the rule under a 1976 law to force the cost of monitoring back on the fishing vessels. But the Alantic ishing fleet challenged the regulation, saying the fisheries service lacked the authority to mandate the industry to pay for the monitoring the NMFS was requiring.

“Chevron is overruled. Courts must exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority, as the [Administrative Procedure Act] requires,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority opinion, adding that the Chevron decision was a “judicial invention that required judges to disregard their statutory duties” to be the ones who interpret the laws passed by Congress or other jurisdictions.

The three liberal women justices — Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson — dissented in this ruling as well, siding with the Biden Administration, which asked the Supreme Court to leave Chevron deference intact. The Justice Department argued that the Chevron doctrine framework allows “experts” at federal agencies, who are more knowledgeable than judges, to interpret statutes.

Headline writers who are Trump haters are now in ‘Replace Biden’ mode after disastrous debate

There was simply no spinning it for the mainstream media after Thursday night. President Joe Biden was an old, old man muttering nonsense, and even CNN and the New York Times could see it.

How bad was it for the president with the reporter-and-editor class that usually protects him? Here are some of the brutal headlines from Friday morning:

New York Times

  • Biden’s Struggles in Debate Alarm Democrats
  • Shaky Performance Against Trump Reinforces Doubts
  • President Biden sought to reassure Democrats after the debate.
  • Former President Trump’s attacks were frequently false, lacked context or were vague enough to be misleading.
  • For U.S. allies, the debate renewed concerns about America’s stability.
  • The debate has left Democratic donors wondering about a Plan B.
  • ‘God Help Us’: 12 Writers Rate Biden’s Performance at the First Presidential Debate
  • THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN: Joe Biden Is a Good Man and a Good President. He Must Bow Out of the Race.
  • PAUL KRUGMAN: The Best President of My Adult Life Needs to Withdraw
  • MICHELLE COTTLE, ROSS DOUTHAT AND EZRA KLEIN: Is Biden Too Old? America Got Its Answer.

Washington Post

  • Democrats panic over Biden, doubting his future
  • ‘There was a slow start’: Harris reacts to Biden’s debate performance
  • Could Biden be replaced as the Democratic nominee?
  • Shares of Trump media company spike nearly 11 percent in premarket trading
  • Can Biden recover from his damaging performance?
  • Perspective: It’s time for Jill Biden to have a hard talk with her husband

Drudge Report

  • OPERATION: REPLACE BIDEN DEMS SCRAMBLE WITH 130 DAYS TO GO! DEBATE CATASTROPHE
  • WHITE HOUSE SPINS WORST PERFORMANCE IN HISTORY: JOE HAS A COLD…
  • U.S. Allies Watch With Shaking Heads and a Question: What Now?
  • China Mocks: ‘Very Entertaining’…
  • Axelrod Tells Republicans, If Biden’s Replaced, ‘You Guys Are in Trouble’…
  • Drudge Poll: Who Should Replace Biden? (Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris, Gavin Newsom, Gretchen Whitmer, Other)

CNN

  • Biden disappoints, Trump lies and deflects
  • Biden’s age problem got worse, Trump ducks on deportations and other key moments to know
  • Live Updates ‘It’s hard to debate a liar,’ Biden says
  • Reaction Biden’s debate performance sets off alarm bells for Democrats
  • CNN Flash Poll Majority of debate watchers say Trump outperformed Biden

Anchorage Daily News

  • A halting Biden tries to confront an untruthful Trump in debate but sparks Democratic anxiety about his candidacy

How bad was it for Biden? Best pundit comments of the night …

The first debate of the presidential election cycle had barely started when the pundits of X/Twitter were at it on the keyboard. They had plenty of material to work with, as President Joe Biden fumbled, mumbled, and was mostly incoherent.

The debate was hosted by CNN in Atlanta and there was no studio audience. Pollsters reported that 70% or more of the audience for the debate were Trump supporters, while Biden voters generally chose not to watch.

Here were some of the best lines from the X pundits as the spectacle unfurled on CNN:

Jesse Kelly: We all thought Joe Biden was a Camp David resting but clearly he spent the last week in Vegas with Charlie Sheen.

Rick Whitbeck: Our Commander in Chief. They totally screwed up his meds tonight…

Jeremy Boreing: So… It’s Michelle, right?

Bill Ackman: I have to say this is embarrassing not just for @POTUS Biden but also for our country.

Ann Coulter: Even CNN can’t save Biden from this performance.

Charlie Kirk: Gavin Newsom is skyrocketing on PredictIt right now.

Greg Gutfeld: Holy sh*t.

Tim Murtaugh: Any media want to take a stab at calling Biden’s performance a “cheap fake” this time?

Jesse Kelly: This might be it for Joe. Man. This is brutal.

Matt Maćkowiak: Senior Dem lobbyist to me just now: “There are going to be multiple members of congress that come out tomorrow and say Biden needs to step aside. For the good of the country.”

Scott Adams: I’ve never see Biden worse. Bad time to find his bottom.

Charles C Cook: Robert Hur deserves an apology.

Russell Brand: We’re 17 minutes in, and Joe Biden is discussing the problem of people being raped by their brothers and sisters, which is quite an extraordinary yet niche topic to discuss.

Sarah Isgur: Forget the election, this is heading into 25th amendment territory.

Kayleigh McEnany: How in the world did 16 people sit at Camp David with Biden for a week and think this was a good idea? Political malpractice.

Ann Coulter: CNN moderators are surprisingly great. Not wildly unfair, as I expected. Good questions. LOVE the mic cut, LOVE no audience.

Michael Steele: This is painful. Trump full of sh!t and Biden can’t find his.

Tim Murtaugh: This is as bad a blowout as any debate I’ve ever seen. The first 30 minutes are key for catching the most viewers and Biden has just been a muttering ghost of his former self. It’s really, really bad. Trump is calm, firm, and in command. The contrast is undeniable.

BIDEN: *rambles incoherently about his failure to secure the border*

TRUMP: “I really don’t know what he said at the end of that sentence. I don’t think he knows what he said either.”

Amy Walter: Odds of a September 10 debate are close to zero about now.

Matt Walsh: That was it. The debate is over. Biden can’t even finish his sentence. Trails off into nonsense. Never seen a presidential candidate freeze like that. A moment that will be remembered forever. And it’s only going to get worse for Biden from here.

Your comments here:

Fifth Republican women’s club endorses Nick Begich

Five out of seven Republican women’s clubs in Alaska have endorsed Nick Begich for Congress, as the Alaska-born Republican tries to unseat Democrat Rep. Mary Peltola. The most recent club is the Matsu Republican Women’s Club, a legacy club of activists established in 1947.

“During the past 4 years Nick has campaigned passionately, traveling to all corners of Alaska, and meeting Alaskans where they live. By listening to Alaskans, he has learned about their concerns, and has been sharing ideas for moving Alaska and the country forward to a brighter future,” the club wrote. “Nick’s drive and passion for Alaska and the important role of Congressman for all Alaskans is evident as he consistently shows up at many functions all over the state, welcoming questions
on every subject. He is well-informed, well-spoken, and his stances on the issues reflect his conservative values.”

The other clubs that have endorsed Begich are Valley Republican Women, the two Kenai clubs and the Fairbanks club.

“In addition to his strong knowledge base, and because of his passion for Alaska, Nick Begich understands the importance of unity as we move toward the General election. He has vowed to withdraw if he places behind other Republican candidates in the Primary Election on August 20, 2024, to not split the vote in the General Election on November 5, 2024. No other candidate has made this vow,” the club wrote. “Nick Begich has proven he is an America-First candidate and is ready for the monumental task of representing Alaska and getting our country on a better track; the Matsu Republican Women’s Club Est 1947 shares with him in support for Donald Trump for President of the United States.”

While over 70% of the Republican women’s political groups that are voting members of the Alaska Republican Party State Central Committee have endorsed Nick Begich, Nancy Dahlstrom, who filed to run against him in November, has gotten the support of a large international police union.

Dahlstrom has a history of support from Big Labor unions. Through her connection to Gov. Mike Dunleavy, she has won the endorsement of former President Donald Trump.

But neither Trump nor Dunleavy have convinced the women activists in the Alaska Republican Party to support Dahlstrom, who has not pledged to drop from contention if she comes in third in the Alaska open primary. Begich has repeatedly made that pledge.