Wednesday, May 6, 2026
Home Blog Page 997

Native heritage hoax? Canadian indigenous health expert suspended after doubts raised about whether she is indeed indigenous

A Canadian public health expert who self-identifies as part Tlingit, and part other North American Native, has been placed on leave by the University of Saskatchewan after an investigation by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation found that she has no Native heritage, but is actually of European descent.

Carrie Bourassa, who also calls herself Morning Star Bears, was the subject of a CBC investigation. She is a professor at the university and is the scientific director of the Institute of Indigenous Peoples’ Health for the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, which also suspended her last week.

On Friday, Bourassa, through an anonymous group, claimed that she has the right to “self-identify as an Indigenous Person, within the greater family of Indigenous Peoples in Canada.” She asserted the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act “confirms and legally supports her to Self- identify as an Indigenous Person.”

Read the original CBC investigative story here.

Bourassa’s news release says that the investigation was instigated by a colleague who has attempted to defame her in previous occasions.

A statement released by her Bourassa’s sister Jody Burnett on behalf of her family says Bourassa’s “description of our family is inaccurate, not rooted in fact and moreover is irrelevant to the issue of whether or not Carrie Bourassa is Métis.”

According to the CBC, Bourassa has for 20 years said that she was born into a family with” Métis, Anishnaabe and Tlingit roots” but has not provided documentation to support her claims.

Bourrassa’s defense statement to the media did not address the problem of her potential heritage hoax, but said she has a legal right to call herself indigenous:

“Dr. Carrie Bourassa responds to the investigation of her cultural identity Manācihitowin: a Cree/Michif phrase that translates to ‘let us respect each other’ REGINA, SK – Dr. Carrie Bourassa asserts and claims the right to self-identify as an Indigenous Person, within the greater family of Indigenous Peoples in Canada. The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Canada’s Legislation Bill C-15: the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act confirms and legally supports her to Self- identify as an Indigenous Person. Combined, the International UNDRIP standard and now Canadian Law provides her Métis Heritage, Culture, Status and Citizenry the necessary legal coverage. In spite of flawless work performance, Dr. Carrie Bourassa was previously investigated for alleged misconduct, instigated by a colleague who has been persistent in her attempts to defame Dr. Bourassa. Carrie was cleared on all 5 counts of the baseless complaints and is now being subjected to another investigation by the University of Saskatchewan. She is a valued and respected academic and community health researcher and she is entitled to due-process.

As a result, many people now question the U of S’ ability to protect faculty members whose credibility is challenged and called into question by their peers. It should be noted that the institution did not exercise any form of internal resolution or protections for Dr. Bourassa and as a result, the internal issue has been degraded to a public spectacle led by journalists and not by Indigenous people.

The current investigation has become a national issue of debate and the discussion appears to be setting precedence for quantum criteria for Nationhood, challenging the communities right to claim and custom adopt. This poses multiple and multidimensional threats to ALL Indigenous persons globally, as public debate surrounding Indigenous identity seeks to eradicate decades of work of global Indigenous leaders who fought and won sovereignty over the ability to determine who is, and who is not, Indigenous. Determining Indigeneity is not within the purview of the U of S or any other non-Indigenous led institution. Currently, the only jurisdiction for Institutions/workplaces, etc. is self-declaration. Furthermore, Dr. Bourassa’s employment is not determined by nationhood and she is not in an Indigenous designated role within the U of S, but rather is an Indigenous health leader from within the faculty of Community Health and Epidemiology in the College of Medicine as a tenured professor.

Dr. Carrie Bourassa has not falsely identified as Indigenous nor taken space away from Indigenous peoples, either in the form of student funding, grants or career advancements. She has earned her professional status and merit through hard work, self-funding and sheer determination. She is a catalyst for determining indigeneity in Indigenous communities, grassroots and globally. Officially claimed by traditional medicine people and her Métis people, long before being Métis had any benefits.

NOTE: This statement was prepared by an Indigenous collective who chose anonymity at this time, to minimize additional backlash and punitive action in the forms of lateral violence towards themselves and Dr. Bourassa. Lateral violence is a learned behaviour as a result of internalised colonialism and patriarchal methods of governing and developing a society. 

Sean Murphy: Eagle River needs to have this discussion about incorporating separately

By SEAN MURPHY

I joined Eaglexit two years ago this February. I donate monthly, attend meetings, and now am the chair for the group. 

Michael Tavoliero, former chair, is a motivator. He speaks black and white. If you read his material and you are a Marxist or communist, you will probably take action. If you are a conservative, then you too will be motivated to action.  

Motivation has its place, and it got me moving. But I am an educator, I want to see our communities educated about the possibility and process of detachment from Anchorage.  

You may see this as a political process, but at this junction this is an educational discussion on civics. 

As an educator, I have committed to taking on the Chair of Eaglexit with the goal of creating a civics course to inform the local community of their options for Alaska local government. To demean this as a political process is short-sighted and does not encourage a discussion among citizens to ultimately inform themselves and improve our community. 

I don’t care which side of the aisle you come from. If you are a community member of Assembly District 2 (AD2), we need to have this discussion for our future and the future of our kids. 

Eaglexit is a collection of citizens in AD2 who want to detach our district from the Municipality of Anchorage and make our new municipality in Alaska. We have studied the state constitution and the petition process, we have studied the revenue and expenditures of AD2, and now want to know if you, the public, during these interesting times are will to have a discussion on the civics of Alaska local government. 

Over the next couple of months, we are planning to hold several educational sessions, in person or online to explain the process. In explaining the process, we will share with you the constitutional guidelines to detachment, the statutes guiding the establishment of a new municipality and school district and discuss the type of local government which may best serve our citizens. 

After the educational sessions we plan on holding some public input sessions in some format to gather your opinions for our new municipality. If the total of your opinions indicate AD2 should move forward with this process, we will start writing our petition to the Local Boundary Commission. That will take some cost in media, polling, and cost for a legal brief. 

As I talk to the community I get several kinds of responses, and I understand all of them. 

First, will my taxes go up?

Our 2020 studies show a revenue of $62 plus million a year for general government and $105 plus million for education. For a community of 51,000 and a school district of 8,000, that should be sufficient. 

Please keep in mind while under the Anchorage jurisdiction AD2’s property taxes alone increased 14.43% from 2019 to 2021, which total from $57,448 million to $65,739 million. We believe our community can do better. 

Second, will my services stay the same? 

We have an area of 1050 square miles. Our roads are outsourced and maintained through a public/private partnership. Our utilities will all remain in place with no increases resulting from the change in local government.

Most of our assembly district is covered by a volunteer fire department and JBER has its own fire and police, so there may be opportunities for cost savings and better service delivery.

In 2021, as one example, we paid $8 million in property taxes for public safety to the MOA, and we get 3-4 police a day. I think we can do better.

Third response I get is silence: “It can’t be done, or they will never let us detach from Anchorage.”

I understand these responses, and have had these same concerns myself, but Eaglexit is bigger than all of these. 

There are seven principles our government is founded on. 

  1. Popular Sovereignty. Who gives the government its power?
  2. Republicanism. How are people’s views represented in government? 
  3. Federalism. How is power shared?
  4. Separation of powers. How is power divided?
  5. Checks and balances. How is power evenly distributed?
  6. Limited government. How is abuse of power prevented?
  7. Individual Rights. How are personal freedoms protected?

I do not see these principles being practiced in our current governing situation. Do you?

If we were a smaller community with direct local control, we the people would be more active in giving the government its power. We the people would have our views more readily represented in government. We the people would have more control over AD2. 

We at Eaglexit continue to be a civics discussing grassroots effort by local citizens open to detaching AD2 from the Municipality of Anchorage.  We want to educate the citizens of AD2 about the process of detachment, the effort needed to detach, and most importantly to give the people living in AD2 the choice for freedom and self-governance.

What a great lesson for us and a spectacular example for our children. 

Lee Jordan said it best, “Will the people of Chugiak-Eagle River have the opportunity to control their own destiny, or must they forever remain subject to what has been decreed for them by Anchorage?” 

The Alaska State constitution allows for our communities to grow and govern themselves. The process takes time and money, but most importantly it takes people. People with the will to stand up and exercise our right to make governing decisions for our community. 

Sean Murphy and his wife Robin came to Alaska with the Army. He moved to Eagle River from Anchorage in 1999 with his family. He is a retired Anchorage School District educator and administrator. He is active with his community council.  He is the new chair of Eaglexit. 

Allard and Jackson file for House seats in the Chugiak-Eagle River districts

Chugiak-Eagle River Assemblywoman Jamie Allard has filed a letter of intent to run for legislative office in 2022.

So has former Alaska House Rep. Sharon Jackson, also of the Eagle River area, who lost her seat to Rep. Ken McCarty in 2020.

Allard is in a House district that will not have an incumbent in it under the new redistricting plan, approved by the Alaska Redistricting Board (but not final until through inevitable court challenges). It will become District 22 under the new plan and is considered the southern part of the Eagle River area.

It’s unclear if Allard is planning to run for House, however, as she has not indicated on her filing. She may be taking a look at the Senate seat, when those Senate lines are finalized by the Redistricting Board early this week. Allard was elected to the Anchorage Assembly in 2020 and has a strong following.

Representing Eagle River in the Senate is Sen. Lora Reinbold, whose seat comes up for election in 2022.

Allard is hispanic and a first-generation Chilean-American. She came to Alaska with the military; both she and her husband are veterans.

The redistricting board moved current District 14 Rep. Kelly Merrick and District 13 Rep. McCarty into the same district.

That northern Chugiak-Eagle River district is now called District 24, and Jackson plans to challenge McCarty and Merrick for it, should they choose to run.

Jackson is a lifelong Republican and former Alaska delegate to the Republican National Convention, where she was a Trump delegate. She was an aide to U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan before being appointed to finish out the legislative term of Nancy Dahlstrom, who was chosen to become Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s commissioner of Corrections.

Jackson came to Alaska as a soldier in the U.S. Army.

The Primary Election in Alaska is now on an open ballot, with all party candidates competing for one of four slots on the General Election ballot. At the General Election, voters are invited to “rank” their preferred candidates from 1-4. The Primary and General Election system has never been tried in America before, and this will be Alaska’s first attempt at the election experiment approved by voters in 2020.

What’s in that $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill for Alaska?

The massive $1.2 trillion spending package passed by the U.S. House of Representatives late Friday night has the infrastructure needs of the country at the center of it, along with climate change mitigation.

There are billions of dollars for roads, bridges, ports, broadband, and the power grid.

Here are some of the big ticket items:

$110 billion for roads, bridges, bridge repair and replacement, and major infrastructure projects. President Joe Biden had originally asked for $159 billion for this portion of the spending package, which had been dubbed the American Jobs Plan.

$65 billion for expanding high-speed broadband access.

$66 billon to eliminate a portion of the Amtrak maintenance backlog, modernize the Northeast Corridor, and bring “world-class service to new areas,” according to the White House.

 $5 billion for replacing old, diesel-burning school buses, with $2.5 billion designated for purchasing electric school buses.

$7.5 billion to develop a national network of electric vehicle chargers.

$55 billion to replace lead water pipes.

$65 billion to upgrade the power infrastructure, including thousands of miles of new transmission lines.

$50 billion to make communities more resilient to the impacts of climate change and cyber-attacks.

$362 million over five years for transportation grants.

$3.5 billion for the U.S. Department of Energy Weatherization Assistance Program to help low-income homeowners with energy efficiency, i.e. windows, doors.

$42 billion to modernize airports, ports, waterways to support supply chains and reduce emissions, including repair and maintenance backlogs, reducing congestion and bottlenecks.

$21 billion to clean up superfund and brownfield sites, reclaim abandoned mines, and cap orphaned gas wells. Of that, Some of those old wells are on the North Slope. $150 million will be awarded to tribes or Native corporations involved in the work.

$11.6 billion for the Army Corps of Engineers for flood control projects.

$3.5 billion for the Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) for flood mitigation and assistance.

$140 million for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for forecasting climate change.

$500 million for NOAA for mapping and forecasting of flooding.

$100 million of $65 billion for internet will come to Alaska.

$3.5 billion for Alaska roads.

$225 million for Alaska bridges.

 $18 billion in loan guarantees for an Alaska natural gas export project that has an estimated cost of $38 billion.

$180 million for water and wastewater projects in Alaska over five years.

$130 million to help Alaska communities relocate away from eroding coasts.

$100 million for the Bureau of Indian Affairs to relocate Native communities away from eroding coastlines.

$230 million for the Alaska Native villages grant program for water and wastewater systems in rural Alaska villages.

$73 million for construction of ferries and ferry terminals and facilities, and operating costs.

$250 million for pilot electric or “low-emitting” ferry development. One grant of that amount is marked for Alaska.

“Tonight, I proudly signed the historic Bipartisan Infrastructure Framework and sent it to @POTUS to be signed into law. This bill delivers a once-in-a-century investment in our infrastructure, creates good-paying jobs and takes a crucial step to #BuildBackBetter For The People,” said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi on Twitter.

The majority of the Biden Administration climate change, social justice, and socialist safety net agenda is in a separate bill called Build Back Better Act. The infrastructure portion was separated from the BBA because of the resistance in Congress to the social engineering aspects of the bigger bill, which include socialist safety-net programs, expansions of Medicaid, universal government funded daycare and other programs. The BBA is what the Democrats will tackle next.

Is the federal government now pushing for ‘new normal’ of masks? New CDC video, academic literature points to permanency

The director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said the quiet part out loud last week: Masks are here to stay. The government is now normalizing the “new normal” of a masked American society, and not just for Covid-19.

“The evidence is clear: Masks can help reduce your chance of Covid-19 infection by more than 80%,” said Dr. Rochelle Walensky in a new YouTube government promotional video. “Masks also help protect from the flu, coronavirus, or even just the common cold. In combination with other steps like getting your vaccination, hand washing, and keeping physical distance, wearing your mask is an important step you can take to keep us all healthy.”

Her video remarks were in answer to the question often posed: “Why do I need to still need to wear a mask?”

Americans in many communities have been wearing masks for over 18 months, with advice from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which has been unwavering in its support for mask-wearing. That is, after the first few weeks of the pandemic, when even Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Chief Medical Advisor to the President, said that wearing masks was not helpful.

On March 8, 2020, Fauci said, “There’s no reason to be walking around with a mask. When you’re in the middle of an outbreak, wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better and it might even block a droplet, but it’s not providing the perfect protection that people think that it is. And, often, there are unintended consequences — people keep fiddling with the mask and they keep touching their face.”

His remarks came during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes. In a 2020 memo, he wrote, “Masks are really for infected people to prevent them from spreading infection to people who are not infected rather than protecting uninfected people from acquiring infection. The typical mask you buy in the drug store is not really effective in keeping out virus, which is small enough to pass through material. It might, however, provide some slight benefit in keep out gross droplets if someone coughs or sneezes on you.”

Later, he said the comment required context:

“I don’t regret anything I said then because in the context of the time in which I said it, it was correct. We were told in our task force meetings that we have a serious problem with the lack of PPEs,” he said in an interview with CBS Evening News.

Alaska Chief Medical Officer Anne Zink also stated in 2020 that masks are not helpful in preventing transmission of the virus.

Zink told the Senate Health and Social Services Committee on Feb. 12, 2020 that a person wearing a mask is breathing in a wet, moist environment collecting viruses and bacteria, and it is in general not useful for protection from other persons’ germs.

In 2021, the science has changed. Dr. Walensky says it can reduce your chance of catching Covid by more than 80 percent.

California and Florida are two examples of states taking different approaches on masking. In early October, Covid transmission was flat in California.

Gov. Gavin Newsom bragged on Twitter that “California continues to lead the nation with the lowest COVID case rate and as the only state in the CDC’s ‘moderate transmission’ category.”

The mask-mandated Golden State is now back in the red “high” territory of transmission. California has had a total of 4.96 million cases since the beginning of the pandemic, and 72,671 deaths attributed to Covid.

Meanwhile, Florida, which has Gov. Ron DeSantis taking a no-mask-mandate approach, sees cases dropping. In fact, California’s rate of transmission is now double that of Florida, Texas, and the rest of the Gulf Coast states.

Florida has reported 3.66 million cases of Covid and 60,334 deaths attributed to the virus. While California’s population (39 million) is greater than that of Florida (27 million), the average Floridian trends much older and therefore more vulnerable to the ravages of Covid. California’s population that is over the age of 65 is 14.3 percent, while Florida’ 65+ population is 20.5 percent.

DeSantis told Fox interviewer Laura Ingram last week that the media has suddenly lost interest in Florida’s Covid situation: “I guess Florida is no longer part of the United States. They just pretend like we don’t exist …Now that we’re in a situation we have very low numbers, you don’t hear a peep.” 

Read: Fox Interview with DeSantis at this link.

But the push toward universal masking is now moving into a new realm. Public universities are teaching professionals how to normalize mask wearing by using social pressure, celebrity influencers, authority figures, and others. The Behavior Change for Good Initiative at the Wharton School and the School of Arts and Sciences of the University of Pennsylvania published a flyer with helpful suggestions such as:

  • “Emphasize that wearing a mask helps convince others to wear a mask too.
  • “Encourage parents to create rituals with their children around mask-wearing.
  • “Recommend that people carry extra masks to give to others.”
  • “Convey that masks can be fashion items allowing for self-expression.”
  • “Trigger disgust and aversion to contagion by reminding people that without masks, they are likely to get up close and personal with undesirable germs.”
  • “When targeting certain groups, seek quotes and images highlighting that masks do not conflict with their values or sense of identity. i.e. Some men may feel that wearing a mask undermines their masculinity. Quotes and imagery should align mask-wearing with independence and strength.”

The Wharton School / UPenn flyer has many other tips for professionals to use to change public behavior for good … or for “good”:

Watch Dr. Walensky video on mask normalization here.

Jesse Sumner, Stephen Wright file letters of intent for open seat in Wasilla

With the House district maps all but set for the Mat-Su Valley, there is an open seat, and Mat-Su Borough Assemblyman Jesse Sumner and Stephen Wright have already filed letters of intent to run. Both are Republicans.

When Wasilla Republicans Rep. David Eastman and Rep. Christopher Kurka were put into the same district, it put Eastman’s old district — 10 — renumbered to become District 26, without an incumbent lawmaker.

Wright said he moved back to Banner Way in January of 2021 and had previously lived in Meadow Lakes for three years. Wright has run for office since 2016, when he ran for Congress against Congressman Don Young. He ran for lieutenant governor in 2018, and State Senate in 2020 against Sen. David Wilson.

Sumner ran for office for the first time when he challenged Rep. David Eastman in the 2020 primary for District 10. He got 1,420 votes, while Eastman won reelection with 1,589. He has not indicated which seat he will run for — House or Senate.

The House District 26 seat was created through redistricting, a process that takes place every 10 years after the U.S. Census.

Alexander Dolitsky: American leftism is the picture of true hypocrisy

By ALEXANDER DOLITSKY

When I arrived to the United States on February of 1978 as a political refugee from a socialist country, I never thought that America would attempt to destroy itself from within with the radical neo-Marxist ideology (i.e., critical race theory, white privilege doctrine, systemic racism, and Black Lives Matter) and the new progressive bumper stickers—“systemic fixing” and “collective justice.” 

I certainly did not expect the public comments on Sept. 11 from State of Alaska Representative, and a former high school history teacher in Juneau, Sara Hannan (D-Juneau). Speaking on the House Floor, she suggested that Nazis’ experiments on Jews during the World War II somehow benefited science and humanity. 

My grandfather, Roman Umansky, was brutally killed by Nazis in 1941 in Kiev, Ukraine. I never met my grandfather and many of my uncles and aunts. Nearly 25% percent of my family were executed by Nazi experiments, or on the battlefields; and six million Jews (50% percent of the entire Jewish nation) were executed by Nazis in the six years of the war. 

I am puzzled and astonished: How a former history teacher could make such an offensive and inappropriate statement? And why were Alaska’s Jewish communities silent? Why didn’t they condemn Hannan’s ridiculous statement? 

They certainly were vocal when Anchorage Mayor Dave Bronson, on Oct. 1, made a much less offensive statement by comparing a mask mandate with  the Holocaust.

He later issued the following statement: “I understand that we should not trivialize or compare what happened during the Holocaust to a mask mandate and I want to apologize for any perception that my statements support or compare what happened to the Jewish people in Nazi Germany, that was one of the most evil and darkest times in our world’s history.” 

On Aug. 25, 2020, the Juneau Assembly passed an ordinance in creating a Systemic Racism Review Committee to investigate institutional racism in Juneau, including possible institutional anti-Semitic occurrences in Juneau. To my knowledge, the committee had no success in their uncovering institutional racism and institutional anti–Semitism in Juneau. Perhaps Sara Hannan’s offensive statement on the House Floor could be a good first project of the committee.

My close friend, in our private correspondence, had this to say about Rep. Sara Hannan’s comments about Nazis’ experiments on Jews:

“Not at all surprising, given that she [Rep. Hannan] is a Democrat politician. Same goes on at the national level with Jewish leaders and the Democrats. So, you need to ask yourself, what is the basis for the continuing alliance of the Jews with the Democrats. Is it just a historic thing? Or is there something continuing? And what was the historic connection to begin with? Maybe you already know the answer to that one; I don’t. But the Democrats, especially the far–left side, are not only turning their backs on the Jews today (both American and Israel), but are actively accusing them of being racists and intolerant of Palestinians and Arabs. The left is overtly active in trying to cut all American aid and support of Israel and shift it to the Palestinians instead. Even ‘centrist”’ Democrats are embracing Islam and are silent on the anti–Jew/Israel demands from the left. If I were a Jew, I’d certainly wonder about what’s going on and why; and I’d certainly question my being a Democrat if that’s what I was.”

Sometime in the early/mid–October, I was removed from the Juneau Jewish Congregation Sukkat Shalom online group; the administrators have not provided me with a reason of my removal from the group; and I will not ask. I suspect it was done because of my writing for the conservative newspapers and blogs on essential and controversial issues facing our nation.

Well, so much for tolerance, freedom of speech and inclusiveness by my fellow Americans at Sukkat Shalom—true hypocrisy at its finest! Today, I am “Uncle Tom” to the Juneau Jewish community—and so be it!. 

Again, my close friend, in our private correspondence, observed it as follows:

“As for your ‘friends’ at the Juneau Jewish Congregation—I think it is an amazing example of how even well–educated and intelligent people can be so blind to their own hypocrisy as long as it fits with the thoughts of the whole group. I’m sure that virtually ALL those people consider themselves and each other as very liberal, open–minded people who value free speech and independent thinking very much. Yet, not only have they excluded you for entirely the opposite of that reason (i.e., they disagree with your thinking and your saying what you think), they apparently are not even aware of how hypocritical they are in doing so! If these well–educated, critical thinkers and leaders of their communities (certainly in their own minds they are) can behave like that so easily, it is really disturbing to realize how easy it must be for less critically thinking people. Yet, another example that George Orwell’s 1984 dystopia is not such an improbable future at all.”

Historically, the main reason leftism is radicalized in America today, and accelerating among our youth, is because young people of the post–Vietnam war generation had never experienced economic hardship and/or oppression by a totalitarian regime; they have been intensely subjected to political correctness, wants, and irrational and wasteful handouts instead of hand–up. 

Far–left progressives are not as they think of themselves—liberal or open minded. In fact, they are illiberal and intolerant deflationists—i.e., I am going to serve you a ball of soup once a month at your place, as long as you don’t crash into my ocean–front home to ask for a real substantive help for your well–being. 

Far–left progressivism is now a religion to some groups; and they possess the typical zeal and emotional attachment to a far-left dogma—socialism and neo-Marxism—which blinds them to having a rational and open mind. Indeed, they are hypocritical fools!

The cry of the poor is not always just. The best revenge against hypocrites and leftists is to live well and prove them wrong.

American leftism—true hypocrisy at its finest!

Alexander B. Dolitsky was born and raised in Kiev in the former Soviet Union. He received an M.A. in history from Kiev Pedagogical Institute, Ukraine, in 1976; an M.A. in anthropology and archaeology from Brown University in 1983; and was enroled in the Ph.D. program in Anthropology at Bryn Mawr College from 1983 to 1985, where he was also a lecturer in the Russian Center. In the U.S.S.R., he was a social studies teacher for three years, and an archaeologist for five years for the Ukranian Academy of Sciences. In 1978, he settled in the United States. Dolitsky visited Alaska for the first time in 1981, while conducting field research for graduate school at Brown. He lived first in Sitka in 1985 and then settled in Juneau in 1986. From 1985 to 1987, he was a U.S. Forest Service archaeologist and social scientist. He was an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Russian Studies at the University of Alaska Southeast from 1985 to 1999; Social Studies Instructor at the Alyeska Central School, Alaska Department of Education from 1988 to 2006; and has been the Director of the Alaska-Siberia Research Center (see www.aksrc.homestead.com) from 1990 to present. He has conducted about 30 field studies in various areas of the former Soviet Union (including Siberia), Central Asia, South America, Eastern Europe and the United States (including Alaska). Dolitsky has been a lecturer on the World Discoverer, Spirit of Oceanus, andClipper Odyssey vessels in the Arctic and sub-Arctic regions. He was the Project Manager for the WWII Alaska-Siberia Lend Lease Memorial, which was erected in Fairbanks in 2006. He has published extensively in the fields of anthropology, history, archaeology, and ethnography. His more recent publications include Fairy Tales and Myths of the Bering Strait Chukchi, Ancient Tales of Kamchatka; Tales and Legends of the Yupik Eskimos of Siberia; Old Russia in Modern America: Russian Old Believers in Alaska; Allies in Wartime: The Alaska-Siberia Airway During WWII; Spirit of the Siberian Tiger: Folktales of the Russian Far East; Living Wisdom of the Far North: Tales and Legends from Chukotka and Alaska; Pipeline to Russia; The Alaska-Siberia Air Route in WWII; and Old Russia in Modern America: Living Traditions of the Russian Old Believers; Ancient Tales of Chukotka, and Ancient Tales of Kamchatka.

Read: Neo-Marxism and utopian Socialism in America

Read: Old believers preserving faith in the New World

Read: Duke Ellington and the effects of Cold War in Soviet Union on intellectual curiosity

Read: United we stand, divided we fall with race, ethnicity in America

Read: For American schools to succeed, they need this ingredient

Read: Nationalism in America, Alaska, around the world

Read: The case of the ‘delicious salad’

Read: White privilege is a troubling perspective

Read: Beware of activists who manipulate history for their own agenda

Read: Alaska Day remembrance of Russian transfer

Latest daily Covid count: 860 in Alaska, as strain on hospitals eases

Testing positive for Covid-19 in Alaska on Thursday were another 860 Alaskans. The number of Alaskans testing positive for Covid has trended lower for the past few weeks.

The big drop has been in the number of Covid patients in Alaska hospitals. Down from over 244 on Oct. 24, there are now just 161 patients, and just 25 of them are on ventilators, down from a high of 38 three weeks ago.

Also dropping is the percentage of patients in hospitals who have Covid. That is now just below 15 percent, whereas two weeks ago it was about 22 percent.

Hospital beds are opening up again, too. with most Southcentral Alaska hospitals having room for ICU and non-ICU patients, while ICU and non-ICU beds in Southeast Alaska are in the green “open” zone.

To date, 714 Alaskans have died, with their deaths attributed to Covid-19.

The decrease in Covid-19 positive cases has dropped 8 percent this week over last week. Some 8.1 percent of people getting tested for Covid in Alaska ended up with a positive result over the past seven days, with an average of 445 positive cases per day during the last week.

Temporary hold: Federal judges block Biden vaccine mandate for employers

A three-judge panel of the New Orleans Fifth District court of Appeals has granted an emergency stay, stopping the Biden Administration in its tracks from forcing employers to make sure all their workers are vaccinated against Covid by Jan. 4, 2022.

The judges said the Biden mandate raises “grave statutory and constitutional issues,” and while it is deciding on the merits of an injunction against the vaccine requirement, it ordered the Biden Administration to submit its legal argument by Monday.

In September, President Joe Biden said his emergency order that forced all federal workers and contractors to get vaccinated would expand to orders that would be coming through the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, OSHA.

On Thursday, OSHA put out its new rules for all employers of 100 workers or more saying they must either make sure all workers are vaccinated or else test unvaccinated workers weekly for Covid. Fines of $14,000 per offense or higher were part of the new OSHA regulation.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy on behalf of Alaska and 10 other Republican-led states filed a legal challenge on Friday to the vaccine mandate on private businesses.