Alexander Dolitsky: 'White privilege' is a troubling perspective undermined by facts - Must Read Alaska
Connect with:
Friday, January 28, 2022
HomeColumnsAlexander Dolitsky: ‘White privilege’ is a troubling perspective undermined by facts

Alexander Dolitsky: ‘White privilege’ is a troubling perspective undermined by facts

gif ad for must read alaska donations

By ALEXANDER DOLITSKY

What is WPT or “white privilege” theory? 

Progressive activists claim it is a social construct and social movement for justice, equal rights and opportunities for people of color who historically were deprived those rights or who have been systemically discriminated against in the United States. 

Conservatives describe this rhetoric as a radical neo-Marxist ideology, cancel culture, utopian socialism, race warfare, and reverse racism; and that in today’s America opportunities are available to nearly everyone.

Historically, the doctrine of “white privilege” is credited to the African-American writer W.E.B. Du Bois, but the phrase has entered the lexicon in feminist Peggy McIntosh’s paper titled “White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack” published in the journal “Peace and Freedom” in July/August issue of 1989.

In her subsequent publications on this subject, McIntosh identified 50 race-related occurrences, or in her own words “Daily effects of white privilege,” that do happen to black Americans in our society, and she pointed to the reasons that keep them in the “out-group.” 

However, McIntosh assertions and findings have been criticized and objected to by many prominent scholars and academics for a lack of factual data.

Here are several excerpts of factual data on this subject from Toby Young’s article titled “No need to plead guilty: The fashionable doctrine of ‘white privilege’ is fatally undermined by the facts,” published in the The Critic in December of 2019.

—A survey of white adults born after World War II showed that between 1980 and 2000, just 18.4 per cent of white Baptists and 21.8 per cent of Irish Protestants—the main white ethnic groups to settle in the South—managed to get college degrees, compared to a national average of 30.1 percent. Among those Americans of Chinese and Indian descent, the average was 61.9 percent.

—When it comes to income, whites are also lagging behind some other ethnic groups. In 2016, white Americans had a median household income of $67,865, lower than Indonesian Americans ($71,616), Pakistani Americans ($72,389), Malaysian Americans ($72,443), Sri Lankan Americans ($73,856), Filipino Americans ($84,620), Taiwanese Americans ($90,1221) and Indian Americans ($110,026).

—According to a recent report by the American Enterprise Institute, 57 percent of black Americans now belong to the upper or middle class, compared to 38 percent in 1960, and the share of black men in poverty fell from 41 percent in 1960 to 18 percent in 2016. But if we look at education, African-Americans are beginning to outperform whites. Black women, for instance, have higher college-attendance rates than white men and, according to the New York Times, out-earn their white counterparts when they graduate.

—Black Lives Matter activists point to the recent spate of shootings of unarmed black men as evidence of “white privilege,” such as the fatal shooting of Trayvon Martin in 2012 (although the shooter was a dual heritage Hispanic man). But according to the African-American Harvard Economist Roland Fryer, blacks and Hispanics are no more likely to be shot by police officers than whites (although they are more likely to experience the non-lethal use of force, even taking contextual factors into account). In fact, the odds of an unarmed black man being shot dead by a police officer are about the same as being struck by lightning.

—The idea that whites as a race participated in the slave trade or benefitted from slavery is ridiculous. In 1860, less than five percent of whites in the American South owned slaves and, according to the black historian John Hope Franklin, three-quarters of white Southerners had no economic interest in the maintenance of slavery.

—Between the 16th Century and the middle of the 18th Century, over a million Europeans were bought and sold in the slave markets of the Barbary Coast of North Africa, encompassing Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco. According to the African-American economist Thomas Sowell: “More whites were brought as slaves to North Africa than blacks brought as slaves to the United States or the 13 colonies from which it was formed [between 1525 to 1866, 388,000 slaves were brought to North America, including Canada, from Africa].”

Georgi Boorman, a Senior Contributor at The Federalist published a June 26, 2018 article titled, “How the Theory of White Privilege Leads to Socialism.” She stated, “White privilege theory seeks equality of outcome, not merely the equal dispensation of individual justice. That goal can only be reached by redistribution policies that violate the principle of local governance, treat people as ethnic “units,” limit individuals’ opportunities based on race, suppress freedom of speech, and restrict the freedom to keep and control one’s own money.”

Today, “white privilege” and “critical race” doctrines in America divide our society between oppressor and oppressed. It identifies the systems by which the oppression takes place. It outlines the methods or tactics (i.e., Black Lives Matter, today’s Antifa, “systemic racism,” “structural racism,” “mental racism,” and “institutional racism”) for how “white privilege” and “critical race” doctrines will change our socio-economic system, moral values, and traditional beliefs.

For “white privilege” and “critical race” activists, a complete destruction of capitalism, in order to establish a socialist authoritarian regime, is the only way to end so-called racial oppression and social injustice. 

The “white privilege” and “critical race” mission is a very troubling, divisive, racist and alarming perspective for our country. This mission is based on the Marxist–Leninist ideology, mainly, “…from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs,” in order to advocate for the radical socialist agenda.

There are two the most important missions in life—where to go and with whom. And here is the ideology that should guide these missions: Believe in the Judeo-Christian moral values, advocate good vs. evil, and stand for freedom, liberty, and factual truth.

Alexander B. Dolitsky was born and raised in Kiev in the former Soviet Union. He received an M.A. in history from Kiev Pedagogical Institute, Ukraine, in 1976; an M.A. in anthropology and archaeology from Brown University in 1983; and was enroled in the Ph.D. program in Anthropology at Bryn Mawr College from 1983 to 1985, where he was also a lecturer in the Russian Center. In the U.S.S.R., he was a social studies teacher for three years, and an archaeologist for five years for the Ukranian Academy of Sciences. In 1978, he settled in the United States. Dolitsky visited Alaska for the first time in 1981, while conducting field research for graduate school at Brown. He lived first in Sitka in 1985 and then settled in Juneau in 1986. From 1985 to 1987, he was a U.S. Forest Service archaeologist and social scientist. He was an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Russian Studies at the University of Alaska Southeast from 1985 to 1999; Social Studies Instructor at the Alyeska Central School, Alaska Department of Education from 1988 to 2006; and has been the Director of the Alaska-Siberia Research Center (see www.aksrc.homestead.com) from 1990 to present. He has conducted about 30 field studies in various areas of the former Soviet Union (including Siberia), Central Asia, South America, Eastern Europe and the United States (including Alaska). Dolitsky has been a lecturer on the World Discoverer, Spirit of Oceanus, andClipper Odyssey vessels in the Arctic and sub-Arctic regions. He was the Project Manager for the WWII Alaska-Siberia Lend Lease Memorial, which was erected in Fairbanks in 2006. He has published extensively in the fields of anthropology, history, archaeology, and ethnography. His more recent publications include Fairy Tales and Myths of the Bering Strait Chukchi, Ancient Tales of Kamchatka; Tales and Legends of the Yupik Eskimos of Siberia; Old Russia in Modern America: Russian Old Believers in Alaska; Allies in Wartime: The Alaska-Siberia Airway During WWII; Spirit of the Siberian Tiger: Folktales of the Russian Far East; Living Wisdom of the Far North: Tales and Legends from Chukotka and Alaska; Pipeline to Russia; The Alaska-Siberia Air Route in WWII; and Old Russia in Modern America: Living Traditions of the Russian Old Believers; Ancient Tales of Chukotka, and Ancient Tales of Kamchatka.

Read: Neo-Marxism and utopian Socialism in America

Read: Old believers preserving faith in the New World

Read: Duke Ellington and the effects of Cold War in Soviet Union on intellectual curiosity

Read: United we stand, divided we fall with race, ethnicity in America

Read: For American schools to succeed, they need this ingredient

Read: Nationalism in America, Alaska, around the world

Read: The case of the ‘delicious salad’

Donations Welcome

Share

Latest comments

  • I can 100% say without a doubt that you don’t need to look any farther than the insurrection on the Capital Building to see white privilege. You know that if that were Muslims or BLM protesters, many people would have been shot and killed by the authorities. But, since they were angry whites, they were allowed to run around like idiots. There are two justice systems in this country, and that is just the truth!

    • “You know that if that were Muslims or BLM protesters, many people would have been shot and killed by the authorities.”
      .
      No, I do not know that. Nor is there any evidence that your statement is realistic in any way.
      .
      In fact, given the way BLM has been treated with kid gloves in DC, as well as across the nation, I would hazard a guess you are wrong in your assertion.

    • I can “… 100% say without a doubt…” that you are a mind-numbed, brainwashed creature of government schools and the idiocy of popular culture. Were you not watching as the communist rioters, excuse me, the peaceful protesters from BLM and ANTIFA, burned down most of the Democrat-run urban sh*tholes in the Country and not only did nobody shoot the lefty punks, they didn’t get arrested or charged.

      There was no “insurrection” at the Capitol; there was an FBI orchestrated gaslighting operation orchestrated with the Democrats and the media to influence fools like you.

      But you are right about one thing; there are two justice systems in this Country. The law applies to conservatives/Republicans, and it doesn’t apply to stupid lefty punks.

    • There are definitely two justice systems in America. The people arrested during the violent BLM riots are already back on the streets, and the people arrested during the remarkably peaceful Jan 6th protest are still in jail.

      Please explain that.

  • Real White Privilege resides on the Anchorage Assembly. Their talk is cheap about race from those “good whites” who virtue signal ad nauseum all day about race which they know little about. The real agenda there is “straight” privilege, that eventually will replace white privilege as a vile propaganda tool.

    • Which is why everyone in Anchorage should encourage Forrest Dunbar to put aside his white privilege, and not run for re-election against a black woman.

  • What is your evidence for your sweeping claim that:

    “For white privilege and critical race activists, a complete destruction of capitalism, in order to establish a socialist authoritarian regime, is the only way to end so-called racial oppression and social injustice.”

    Who advocated that?

    • The BLM folks.
      “We are trained marxists.” Patrisse Cullors, BLM Co-founder.

      • Critical race theory is an academic doctrine.

        Black Lives Matter is not an academic doctrine.

        It is false that critical race theory, as an academic doctrine, claims that “a complete destruction of capitalism, in order to establish a socialist authoritarian regime, is the only way to end so-called racial oppression and social injustice.”

        That is simply not an accurate description of that academic doctrine.

        Someone from Black Lives Matter, who says that Black Lives Matter is Marxist, does not equate to critical race theory being Marxist. That would be, well, a logical fallacy.

        Also, the notion that Black Lives Matter can be defined by one person’s description of Black Lives matter, is absurd.

        • The operative word in Critical Race Theory is Critical.
          .
          Marx created/perfected the idea of teaching people to criticize any system, to strictly look at the imperfections of that system without acknowledging any benefits. Any “theory” that starts off with Critical is Marxist.
          .
          Critical Economic Theory: “In a capitalism system some people earn more than others. Therefore, the system is a failure.”
          Critical Sports Theory: “Tom Brady is a much better quarterback than the rest of the NFL, therefore, the NFL is a failure>”
          Critical Race Theory: “A black person does not get promoted, therefore, racism is rampant.”
          .
          Notice what the overall effect is? Perfection, otherwise the system is a failure. I cannot think of a better way to sell socialism to children, than to get them obsessed strictly on the negatives, while ignoring the plethora of positives.
          .
          Neither could Marx.

          • Children need to learn that life is not about positives and negatives but rather just reality. The expression, “All Men are Created Equal.” is a total fallacy. The reality is that no two people are equal in any sense…. except for their value as children of God.

        • “Also, the notion that Black Lives Matter can be defined by one person’s description of Black Lives matter, is absurd.”
          .
          Sorry, had to touch on this one as well.
          .
          Curiously, doing exactly that is called… human nature. When there is a mass shooting, the knee jerk reaction is to blame all gun owners. When a radicalized muslim commits an act of terrorism, the immediate reaction is to blame islam.
          .
          And, when a liberal tells you what they are, and what their organization is (it was not “I am a trained marxist.” it was “we…”), believe them.

  • Facts are inconvenient things to the left. Always have been.

    White privilege, critical race, whatever you want to call it is nothing more than an old Soviet trick to disrupt communities.

    It obviously works.

  • Want to skip to the end and see how this turns out? Easy

    For a quick version, reference the break up of Yugoslavia and the following near genocide in Bosnia.

    For the more complete version, read The Gulag Archipelago by Solzhenitsyn.

    We deliberately made our kids too stupid to read history. This is where it leads

  • A very well written and timely story. Excellent Mr. Dolitsky!

  • Using facts to counter the Leftist narrative. Admirable, but sadly futile.

  • The most dangerous people in the world are atheists. They believe that if you kill someone there is no supernatural punishment. At last count they are up to 150,000,000 murdered in the last century. What happens when the world is run by atheists?

    • Is this a joke? The result would be that a net improvement would be ushered in. Anyone could argue that believers have had the absolute worst track record of any in history and that extends through to today. Crusades, Spanish Inquisition, even the pope had a militaristic approach toward God’s leadership and interests throughout Europe and anywhere else in the world he could exert influence.

      What’s the difference between these people?:
      – a science based individual
      – a christian nutbar that believes in hell
      – a taliban freak that wants your daughter in a hajib and the hand of petty thieves

      The answer is that the primary difference is religious perspective which is and always has been the absolute worst influence all throughout history.

    • I’m an atheist and I’ve never killed anyone, never even thought about it. And I don’t give a dang about your supernatural punishment, that’s your goblin.

  • One of my close friends made an interesting observation: “”White privilege” and “critical race” doctrines are leading us to the socialist authoritarian regime—just like an ant colony. Every ant works unselfishly for the colony, not just itself, and presumably there isn’t even any necessity for individual spying and reporting on one another, either. In fact, the head of state is the queen, who unselfishly spends her whole life producing and pumping out eggs! If that’s the high point of social evolution, then ants have already been there since before humans even became humans. But, personally, I could never aspire to being an ant, nor could I ever see ant life as a utopia. Certainly, it seems to be the direction that human society, including in the US, is headed, except for the role of the head of state, who’s job will be just to get fatter and fatter, like Kim Jon-un.”

    • Your close friend is correct.
      .
      The operative word in Critical Race Theory is not race. It is critical. Take any system, and focus solely on the negatives. Ignore the multitude of blacks in the US that are doing quite well, and strictly focus on the George Floyds. And, you will end up with the idea that the US is a racist country. Do the same thing with economics, and because everyone is not as rich as Bezos/Musk/Gates, the system is a failure.
      .
      This is what Karl Marx pushed to sell socialism. It is easy to decide capitalism is a failure if you don’t acknowledge any of the benefits.

%d bloggers like this: