Saturday, August 8, 2026
Home Blog Page 814

Notes from the trail: ‘Woke’ Mary Peltola tells voters of her preferred pronouns

Pronouns for Peltola: Mary Peltola, a Democrat serving in Congress for Alaska, posted her pronouns on the screen during Tuesday’s debate in Healy, Alaska, where she attended via Zoom. Her pronouns are she/her.

The debate featured, in person, Chris Bye, Nick Begich, and Sarah Palin, pictured above with Peltola and her pronouns on a video screen at the student-led candidate forum at Tri-Valley High School. There was a separate forum for Senate candidates on Oct. 24, with candidates Kelly Tshibaka and Pat Chesbro, and Sen. Lisa Murkowski was not able to attend.

Fact-checking Peltola: Congresswoman Mary Peltola says in her ad that she puts pressure on Biden (and links herself to Sen. Dan Sullivan and Sen. Lisa Murkowski), and yet she voted with Biden 100% in her short time in Congress and has a 100% Biden score, according to fivethirtyeight.com.

David Pruhs: David Pruhs was sworn as mayor of Fairbanks on Monday. His brother Dana, the chairman of AIDEA, and Dana’s daughter, Danner (also David’s niece) was there, all of which are graduates of Cal Poly.

Debate watch party ahead: The Debate for the State on KTUU is the biggest debate of the year and will feature congressional candidates Nick Begich, Chris Bye, Sarah Palin, and Mary Peltola. Americans for Prosperity Alaska will host a debate watching party at 49th Street Brewery, with analysts Ivan Moore, Matt Larkin, and moderator Sarah Erkmann Ward. It’s a free event with drink tickets provided.

More events this week:

Anchorage Assembly admits its Golden Lion Hotel plans would have been illegal, now wants it run as a flophouse

The Anchorage Assembly is attempting a more legal method of getting homeless people into the Golden Lion hotel property at the corner of New Seward Highway and 36th Avenue.

The Assembly majority, which had illegally designated the property for homeless emergency shelter, has conceded it can’t legally be used for that.

The hotel was put under city ownership by former Mayor Ethan Berkowitz, who was going to put drug addicts in it. That caused a neighborhood uproar, including objections from operators of a nearby Jewish preschool.

Now, it appears destined to become an old-fashioned flophouse until the Assembly can figure out how to use it for a drug treatment center. The Guest House is being run as workforce housing, under the negotiated agreement between the Mayor’s Office and the Assembly, but is not property owned by the municipality; it has been transferred to ownership by First Presbyterian LLC. The Rasmuson Foundation has money from the Assembly to purchase of old Barrett Inn in Spenard, for a similar use, under the negotiated agreement. With the Golden Lion, however, the fact that the city owns it causes different complications.

The Assembly majority put its new plans on Tuesday’s agenda as a surprise “laid on the table” item. Those items are supposed to be for emergencies, but the Assembly uses them to spring actions on an unsuspecting public that may have checked the Assembly’s agenda and didn’t find anything controversial. Without sitting through the meeting, the public would never know. “Laid on the table” items are now used a way to subvert the public process.

The Assembly now says that the municipality can get a third-party contractor and then charge rent for the tenants, for some nominal portion, on a month-to-month basis. The contractor would execute rental agreements with individual tenants for most of the units that formerly served as hotel rooms. “Rental agreements can be month-to-month or for 1 year, whichever maximizes access to availably types of rental assistance and is feasible during the duration the property is leased to the contract operator,” the Assembly wrote in its resolution.

“It is anticipated that rental costs will largely covered by rents made up from federal emergency rental assistance funds and other available types of rental assistance. Persons renting a single housing unit will be required to certify that one or more prospective tenants within the household has qualified for unemployment benefits or experienced a reduction in household income, incurred significant costs, or experienced other financial hardship during or due, directly or indirectly, to the coronavirus pandemic; one or more individuals within the household can demonstrate a risk of experiencing homelessness or housing instability; and the household is a low-income family,” is qualified as such under federal guidelines, the Assembly majority wrote.

Under the Assembly majority’s latest idea, the contract operator would not offer services that would qualify the facility as a transitional living facility or drug rehabilitation care facility, as defined by the federal government. None of the units has cooking facilities, nor would those be added to the hotel rooms, but the contract operator could provide dining services. There used to be a cafe in the building.

Further, according to the Assembly’s newest idea, no retail or wholesale sales would be able to be on site, nor any storage or display of merchandise, such as snack or candy machines.

Tenants would have to pay with an emergency housing voucher or other housing voucher that would cover the rental amount, or have the ability to pay the fee for the room without such assistance.

Regardless of payment type, the tenants could not have incomes exceeding 30% of the area median income.

The Assembly on Tuesday directed the mayor to provide details by Nov. 1 about how the Golden Lion will be used as housing, and to provide a written report to the Assembly by Nov. 4, which would outline any code-imposed impediments to putting the hotel into service as housing.

During the same meeting, the Assembly, on a vote of 9-3, chose to end its agreement with the mayor on the navigation center that has been under construction on Tudor Road. That center was part of the negotiated plan that the Assembly approved and partially funded last April.

Open letter to Mitch McConnell: Stay out of Alaska election

By CRAIG CAMPBELL | ALASKA REPUBLICAN PARTY NATIONAL COMMITTEEMAN

An open letter to Senator Mitch McConnell, Minority Leader, U.S. Senate

October 25, 2022

Dear Senator Mitch McConnell:

Stop involving yourself in the affairs of the Alaska Republican Party.

As our party’s state national committeeman, and as a former lieutenant governor of our great state, allow me to explain how we do things up here. As Republicans, we tend to our own business, and we expect others to leave us to it.

Nineteen months ago, our state party censured Sen. Lisa Murkowski “for her votes and actions contrary to the Alaska Republican Party platform and best interests of the State of Alaska.” Our state Party then enthusiastically endorsed Kelly Tshibaka as our official Republican candidate in the 2022 general election for United States Senate.

Senator McConnell, the primary mission of the Republican Party, for which you are a senior leader, is to elect Republicans. As leader of the Senate Leadership Fund, an independent super PAC, your organizations stated objective is to “build a Republican Senate majority.” I submit, sir, that your current vicious negative campaign against our Alaska Republican Party endorsed candidate for United States Senate, Kelly Tshibaka, is not only misguided, but a violation of your organizations stated goal and destructive to the principles and values of the Republican Party.

At a time when you should be laser focused on gaining a large Republican senate majority in next month’s election, you have spent about $9.0 Million dollars in Alaska on negative ads trashing our endorsed Republican candidate. The ads are filled with lies, for which Tshibaka has produced documented proof. They have caused unprecedented anger among state Republicans. So far five local district committees have passed resolutions condemning your actions – including one which pleaded with your Kentucky GOP to intervene – and three influential Republican Women’s Clubs have also called on you to cease and desist.

This weekend the Alaska Republican Party State Central Committee approved a resolution “condemning the egregious, misleading, and divisive behavior of Senator Mitch McConnell and the Senate Leadership Fund.” The resolution further requested the Senate Leadership Fund immediately stop the attack ads against Kelly Tshibaka and discontinue all support of Senator Murkowski. It also requested the Republican Party of Kentucky leadership act against you for your inappropriate behavior against Alaska Republicans and our Republican endorsed candidate, Kelly Tshibaka.

Instead of wasting precious millions attacking an Alaskan Republican, you should be investing every dime you can collect towards supporting Republican senatorial candidates across our great land who are in close races against DEMOCRATS. If Ron Johnson loses his reelection in Wisconsin; or Dr. Oz loses in Pennsylvania; or Mike Lee loses in Utah; or Laxalt loses Nevada; or Blake Masters loses in Arizona, you will be partly responsible for diverting needed campaign funding away from these races to attack a Republican in Alaska who is running against another Republican.

Your job is to elect Republicans to gain a Republican senate majority. On election day, Alaska will again choose a Republican senator. Whether Alaskans elect Lisa Murkowski or Kelly Tshibaka, we are going to send a Republican to the United States Senate, that’s a fact. Stop your vicious smear attacks on Kelly Tshibaka and focus on the races we need to win for America to have a solid Republican senate majority next year.

As an Alaskan, and as our national committeeman, I implore you to stop it, and leave Alaska elections to Alaskans.

Craig Campbell is the Republican National Committeeman from Alaska and served as Alaska’s tenth lieutenant governor.

Downing: McConnell’s proxy war with Trump in Alaska is stuck on stupid

Mike Shower: Keeping Alaska on the right path

By SEN. MIKE SHOWER

Alaska is one of the most amazing places on the planet. I’ve traveled all over the globe and no place has ever quite matched up.  The same can be said of Alaskans; varied backgrounds, hardworking, tough and independent. It’s hard to find a place with more “Don’t Tread on Me” flags & bumper stickers. 

I’ve had the privilege to represent one of the largest, most conservative and yet diverse districts in the state.  From ports and coastal towns to the interior, bush to urban, it included rail lines, pipelines including TAPS, military bases, multiple Alaska Native tribes, mining, oil & gas, logging, fishing, and even up to Denali National Park.  

This presents unique challenges like maintaining roads and infrastructure for such a vast area. Providing emergency response like fire and police, medical services, educational opportunities, cheap energy, clean water, and jobs are tougher challenges in many areas of our district compared to urban settings.  

I think many of you feel like I do, our state is at a crossroads for the path it will follow into the future. This election may be the most important in our lifetime due to a confluence of events.  Ranked choice voting, the constitutional convention question, unaffordable long term government spending, the PFD and a changing demographic have many of us asking, “where do we go from here”?  Who we send to Juneau is just as important when combined with these other issues.  

Unfortunately, mudslinging seems to happen towards the end of campaign season. It’s still disappointing. Recently a district chair sent an email out which had significant information about my opponent. I’ve not engaged in that nor do I wish to. I didn’t ask for anything to be written and want to stay focused on what matters – policy, positions, support or opposition of legislation and other matters of governance.  

For my part, I have the highest conservative lifetime rating in the Alaska Senate by CPAC and American Conservative Union Foundation.  Not from campaign promises, but from an actual record — how I voted, bills & issues I supported or opposed, legislation I introduced and moved, speeches made on the floor and in committee. All is open for inspection.

I would, however, like to provide one clarification. My opponent dragged my name into this exchange with a gross accusation. According to Mr. Massie, “Mike Shower was absent for 25% of the votes taken during his time in office. This is not an accusation; this is a verifiable, factual statement.”

It took me about 30 minutes to go to the Alaska Legislative website, pull up my voting record and add it all up. It wasn’t difficult. Simple math. I didn’t even miss half the votes he contends, and of the legislators who missed more, not a single one even came close to missing 25% of the votes during their service, ever.

Every legislator misses votes, as life happens and it isn’t scheduled around four or more months of sessions — regular or special sessions. I don’t think anyone would fault me for missing votes for a funeral, my wife’s emergency back surgery, or a family wedding. All happened.

For my opponent’s part, either he’s getting bad advice, didn’t actually go to the website and do the math, or is being dishonest about the “verifiable facts.”  

In any case, it’s troubling to see a claim being made which is easy to disprove and appears itself to be a smear which he, ironically, claims to dislike. I have a different proposal – let’s discuss the issues that plague us:A comprehensive fiscal policy solving the Permanent Fund dividend, constitutional spending cap and a balanced budget. A comprehensive energy policy for Alaska including building a gas line, a new refinery, alternative energy including micro nuclear, hydro and upgrading our electrical grid. Cheap energy has always equaled economic prosperity but we need a plan. We must focus on how we’ll add value to our own natural resources vs. just selling raw materials.

Alaska has some of the greatest reserves on the planet, we must be in full afterburner towards developing Alaska’s resources for our state and nation. Education? Election reform? Judicial reform? Criminal justice and rehabilitation reform? Medical reform? I discuss these tirelessly on the campaign trail; I’d love to see my opponent do so. It’s what you deserve to hear from your candidates, not vague generalities.

There is much to do, and many problems and tasks before us.  We must be resolute in solving them for our children and grandchildren. We can ill afford to waste time on anything less.

For Michelle and I it has been an honor to serve our nation for over two decades in uniform. Even as we’ve worked for 12 years in the private sector and concurrently for the last 5 years in the state Senate as a citizen legislator, we’re honored to continue that service.  We consider this a sacred duty; one we take with the utmost sense of obligation and respect.

For almost 30 years, Alaska has been our home, and if the Alaskans of District O choose to send us back for another four years, we will do our best to live up to your expectations and do all in our power to set Alaska on the right path to a bright and sustainable future.  

Sen. Mike Shower is the incumbent senator for Seat O, stretching from Wasilla and Valdez to Healy and Anderson.

Randy Ruedrich: What it means to ‘rank the red’ for conservatives in November

By RANDY RUEDRICH

The 2020 Ballot Measure 2 eliminated Alaska’s Republican primary. The 2022 General Election with ranked choice voting requires:

  • Conservatives must rank the red (vote Republican) in races with a Democrat.    
  • Conservatives should never rank a Democrat in any race.
  • In Republican vs. Republican challenges, conservatives have what can be considered a delayed primary election, which is decided on Nov. 8.  

First, let’s look at the races on the November ballot that have no active Democrat campaigns. Conservatives must select their candidate and vote. Rather than review all of them here, let’s elect a representative or senator who will work with other conservatives to enact worthwhile legislation. 

Endless debates do not advance our agenda. Arguing and grandstanding don’t get results. Don’t let the ranked-choice jargon prevent us from sending our best candidates to Juneau to advance our agenda.

One campaign requires special attention. Sen. Mike Shower was appointed the Alaska Senate in 2017 by Gov. Bill Walker and elected in 2018. In five years, Sen. Shower has not succeeded in passing a single piece of legislation he originated.    

Whilst Senator Shower talks about election reform, he delivered none. As chair of the State Affairs Committee, Sen. Shower failed to pass a single piece of election reform legislation in four years. Of particular note, his 2022 attempt at election reform legislation did not address any change to the problematic automatic Permanent Fund dividend voter registration initiative language. 

Sen. Shower’s committee work product sent to Senate Finance resembled a left-wing end-run. It provided for same day voter registration; four-year absentee ballot requests to maximize loose ballots on campuses, military installations, and retirement facilities; and prohibited organizations like the Republican Party from partially completing absentee ballot applications for distribution to voters. These Democrat election reform jewels were passed out of Sen. Shower’s State Affairs committee.    

For the first time in my 37 years as an Alaska Republican, I testified against a bill from a committee chaired by a Republican. ARP Chair Ann Brown also testified against this Shower committee bill in the Senate Finance hearing. Shower’s Democrat Election Reform bill was not adopted by the 2022 Legislature.

Let’s elect effective Senators and House Representatives in 2022.

Randy Ruedrich served as Alaska Republican Party chairman from 2000 to 2013, served on the Republican National Committee for 13 years, and as an Alaska member of the Electoral College in 2020.

David Ignell: Support justice and vote yes for a constitutional convention to restore justice in Alaska

By DAVID IGNELL

In 1956, Alaska’s founders expected that subsequent constitutional conventions would be necessary. Fairbanks delegate Warren Taylor said, “I think the next Constitutional Convention will possibly have a little better idea than we have now.” Homer delegate Yule Kilcher agreed with Taylor and remarked our constitution wasn’t as spectacular as some thought, and even minor matters should be taken up at the next convention.

When billions in oil money started flowing into our government, the legal system our founders set up got hijacked. The Alaska Supreme Court began defying our Alaska Constitution. Their disdain for the peoples’ rights trickled down into the ranks of prosecutors and law enforcement.

Since judges and lawyers are self-regulating, the lawlessness spread like wildfire. A cartel like structure developed and ethical lawyers became silenced in fear. Today, their Rules of Professional Conduct and Code of Judicial Conduct gather dust.

At risk are the unwealthy, particularly Alaska Natives, who account for 40% of our prison population. Many of them have been denied unbiased investigations, fair trials, and juries of their peers. They’re helpless against prosecutors who coerce unfair plea bargains to pad career stats.

Also at risk are grand juries, which have an unlimited right to investigate all government entities and make recommendations concerning the public welfare. In 1988 three Supreme Court judges proved their disdain for the Constitution by forcing through Court Rule 6.1 that illegally curtailed grand jury reports. They overruled their two colleagues who were adamant Rule 6.1 was unconstitutional. It’s unsound government policy when we have no safeguard against outlaw judges.

Illegal Court Rule 6.1 remains in effect today, hindering transparency in government affairs.

For instance, many Anchorage readers may recall the sexual abuse scandal that exploded at Bartlett High School in 1989. Those same three Supreme Court judges, unaccountable to voters, prevented the public from reading the grand jury’s investigative report and learning the truth. Those judges even defied the Anchorage Daily News, whose editors once stood for the people but now protect successive waves of our outlaw judges. Truth has taken a back seat to politics.

While writing my recent book on the Alaska Grand Jury, I gained tremendous respect for our original delegates. Yule Kilcher, Mildred Hermann, Ed Davis, and Marvin “Muktuk” Marston gave compelling speeches at the convention promoting justice and equality for all Alaskans. They would be horrified today at our legal system.

Marston would be particularly dismayed with our embarrassing prison statistics. He spoke of an “Arctic friend” of his who had been wrongfully imprisoned without the money to defend himself. Marston supported the grand jury because without it, his friend would have “lost his job and been a derelict on the shores of white man’s civilization.” Marston wouldn’t stand for a judicial system that has enabled Wasilla’s Goose Creek and Juneau’s Lemon Creek to become new sites of our largest villages.

Before statehood, Alaska judges were appointed by the federal government. Our founders hoped the Alaska Judicial Council appointment system would be an improvement. The Alaska Judicial Council consists of four lawyers from the Alaska Bar Association and three non-lawyers who decide what two candidates will pass through to the governor. Our founders were familiar with a different Alaska Bar Association in 1956; it wasn’t dominated by politics and took its ethical obligations seriously.

The model behind our Alaska Judicial Council system was an unproven experiment known as the “Missouri Plan.” Introduced during World War II, Missouri’s appellate judges were determined by a panel of lawyers. For trial judges however, voters in each county were given the option to either elect them or let the lawyers decide. Over the last 75 years, only 5 of Missouri’s 115 counties have opted for the lawyers. It speaks volumes that 96% of Missouri counties have preserved their right to vote for trial judges.

Delegate Robert McNealy, a Fairbanks lawyer, predicted “this appointment method will bring judges into politics more so than an election by the people.” Time has proven him right. Several years ago, the Wall Street Journal observed, “Missouri’s courts are every bit as hung up in politics as they are in other states. The difference is that in Missouri the process happens behind closed doors.”

We’re worse off. Alaska Judicial Council deliberations aren’t open to the public either, but we can’t even vote for our trial judges.

The Alaska Bar Association has transitioned into an elite trade group for the wealthy, increasingly influenced by its growing ranks of highly paid government lawyers who thirst for even more unchecked power. Forbes estimates a law school degree costs about $200,000 – most Alaskans can’t afford that. Political influences on the Alaska Bar Association and the four Alaska Judicial Council lawyers end up determining how the law will be applied to you and 730,000 other Alaskans.

We must seal up the back door into our government this unelected oligarchy has tunneled.

Alaskans can best hold our judges accountable to the Constitution by giving voters the power to choose them. That’s how our closest neighbors to the south do it — Washington, Oregon, Idaho, and Montana. They elect all judges in non-partisan elections.

The clear intent of our founders is found at the beginning of our Constitution, “All political power is inherent in the people.” We currently have no power to hold outlaw judges and government lawyers accountable and will need a new constitutional convention to correct their bold abuse of our Founders’ trust.

Don’t let the well-funded fear mongers compromise your independent Alaskan mind. They speak for special interest groups that have exploited the weaknesses in our Constitution and infested our government. Their opposition to giving the people the final say over our Constitution says it all.

Vote “YES” to restore democracy and justice in Alaska.

David Ignell is a forensic journalist at www.poweredbyjustice.com – Public Advocacy And Justice For All Alaskans.

page2image66027936

Breaking: Grunwald withdraws from Charlie Pierce ticket, endorses Gov. Mike Dunleavy

Edie Grunwald, the lieutenant governor candidate on the Charlie Pierce ticket, has decided she’s out. She is endorsing Gov. Mike Dunleavy and his running mate Nancy Dahlstrom and encouraging others to join her.

Pierce has been sued by one of his former employees at the Kenai Borough, where he was mayor until Sept. 30.

Grunwald made the statement sent to supporters Tuesday. Her name will remain on the ballot, as voting has already begun and the legal window has long past. 7,000 absentee ballots have already been cast. Should Pierce win election to the governorship, she would have to resign.

Pierce has not yet released a statement, but has denied the claims made by his former employee, who evidently didn’t accept a settlement negotiated by her lawyers with the borough and is now suing Pierce and the borough for a list of salacious allegations. Many political observers have noted the timing of the lawsuit, which appears to be intended to damage Pierce.

Meeting Tuesday: Second double-cross expected by Assembly majority on homeless navigation center

The Anchorage Assembly will meet Tuesday evening at the Loussac Library’s Assembly Chambers. Based on the hostility the Assembly has shown to Mayor Dave Bronson since he took office in 2021, the liberal majority is expected to deny the funds needed for the homeless navigation center, which began construction last month after initial approvals were received by the Mayor’s Office. 

The Assembly had once appropriated $6.2 million for the project, and then approved $800,000 for design work. Assemblyman Felix Rivera directed the Alaska Community Foundation, a partner in the homeless project, to cut a check to buy the structure, made out to Roger Hickel Contracting, and the Assembly had made every indication that it would go through with it.

Must Read Alaska predicted the Assembly was engaged in a bad-faith negotiation in this news report in May, 2022:

As predicted in May, it appears the Assembly majority was only faking cooperation so they could get the Mayor’s Office to approve the purchase of the Sockeye Inn, to house medically fragile homeless people. Once that purchase was complete, the Assembly leadership pulled its support for the navigation center, which is a “housing first” low-barrier service-enriched shelter to help chronically homeless people get back on their feet.

At today’s meeting, the Assembly, after stalling the project for 18 months, is going to likely deny the funds to pay the bill, which will trigger a lawsuit from Roger Hickel Contracting to get paid for the work that has been done on the foundation.

Assembly hardliners who oppose the mayor may want to postpone the work so there can be no navigation center this winter, and to embarrass the mayor and use it as a weapon against him in the event he decides to run for reelection in 2023. Since the Assembly has delayed the work, the mayor has been forced to reopen the Sullivan Arena for housing of the homeless population during the winter months.

The Assembly meeting starts at 5 pm; the agenda is at this link.

Court: Eastman back in Anchorage Superior Court for more hearings on his membership in Oath Keepers

Another day in court for Rep. David Eastman of Wasilla, who is defending himself against a “lawfare” (legal political warfare) attack by the Left, which is challenging whether he can serve as a legislator due to his membership in an organization that became associated with the Jan. 6, 2021 incident at the U.S. Capitol.

Eastman’s hearing in front of Judge Jack McKenna on Tuesday at 2 pm is not the trial itself, but will involve witnesses and the question of whether the trial can be moved to Palmer Superior Court, closest to where Eastman lives. Eastman has requested a change of venue. It’s speculated by some that McKenna will rule the trial must be in Anchorage, in order to have a more Democrat-voting jury, and the Northern Justice Project, which represents Kowalke, will fight to keep it in Anchorage. The case is 3AN-22-07404CI at this link.

McKenna has ordered the Division of Elections to delay certification of House District 27 election results pending the result of the trial that he has already granted. But he also decided that Eastman could remain on the November ballot. The trial itself is currently scheduled for Dec. 12, although court dates often change.

Before today’s hearing, a crowd may gather in front of the Nesbett Courthouse in the hour preceding the hearing, as civil libertarians from the right side of the political spectrum have put out the word to rally in support of Eastman’s rights under the U.S. Constitution to have his free speech and freedom of association honored.

The case against Eastman is an attempt to get the State Division of Elections to rule that Eastman is not eligible to serve as a lawmaker, since the Oath Keepers, of which he has a lifetime membership, is deemed by some people who call themselves experts to be a group that attempted to overthrow the U.S. government. The complainants say that his membership in that group violates the “disloyalty” clause of the Alaska Constitution.

Although Eastman was in Washington, D.C. on Jan. 6, 2021, he did not go inside the Capitol, but remained at a distance with a group of Alaskans who support Donald Trump. It’s not clear he was in D.C. in his role as a member of Oath Keepers, or simply as a supporter of the former president.