Sunday, June 14, 2026
Home Blog Page 465

Linda Boyle: Court says FDA must take down its ‘You are not a horse’ ad campaign against Ivermectin

By LINDA BOYLE

Do you remember in 2021 how crazy and hostile the FDA and CDC were over Americans turning to Ivermectin to treat Covid?  People who could not get “human” Ivermectin resorted to “horse paste” Ivermectin, they were so desperate to treat Covid-19.  

The federal government discredited the use of any Ivermectin to treat Covid-19. Why? Possibly because it would have been difficult to get Emergency Use Authorization for Moderna and Pfizer “vaccines” if there had been a safe, effective, and cheap treatment available.

Finally, the FDA has settled the lawsuit over its misinformation campaign. Of course, the FDA has not admitted to any wrongdoing, nor does it agree with the ruling.   

Read this study on Ivermectin treatments for early Covid.

Many of us found a way to get Ivermectin pills and used them to treat Covid. We also had a few brave doctors who were willing to risk their licenses to practice medicine.  

Even today, doctors are losing their licenses to practice, or having their licenses restricted, including Dr. Ryan Cole whose license in Washington state was restricted last month by the Washington Medical Board.  

Dr. Meryl Nass of Maine has had her license suspended for two years by the Maine Medical Board.

Their crime?  Misinformation and using Ivermectin to treat Covid.  

Back in September of 2023, the Fifth Circuit Court determined the FDA did not have the authority to say one shouldn’t take Ivermectin as the FDA is not a physician.  

The court said the FDA “overstepped its authority with a campaign warning people not to take the drug.” 

Drs. Robert Apter and Mary Talley Bowden who brought the lawsuit stated between them they had treated about 9,000 Covid patients with a survival rate of 99% with the use of Ivermectin. 

Dr. Paul Marik was also a plaintiff in the lawsuit. He resigned from Eastern Virginia Medical School in 2021 after being attacked over his used of Ivermectin and other Covid-19 treatments. Marik said drugs like Ivermectin, originally an anti-parasite medicine whose creators won the Nobel Prize for formulating, is a safe and effective way to treat patients in the early stages of Covid, and was a low-cost and low-risk alternative to other treatments.

When the FDA began a public relations campaign in the spring of 2021 it mentioned people using large doses of the drug intended for livestock.  

The FDA sent letters to state medical boards and pharmacy boards warning against the use of Ivermectin to treat Covid, saying the use of high doses was dangerous. This warning prevented these doctors from using appropriate amounts of Ivermectin to treat patients. It also led to disciplinary actions being taken against them. 

“The FDA’s campaign, coupled with their advocacy of ivermectin, caused them problems: A major Houston hospital system forced Talley Bowden to resign her privileges; Apter was referred to physician regulatory boards of Arizona and Washington state for discipline; Marik was forced to resign from his post at Eastern Virginia Medical School, where he was a medical professor and chief of pulmonary and critical care,” a report from Courthouse News says.

Because of the FDA’s campaign, numerous mainstream media outlets ran with the story about using Ivermectin as horse medicine without ever mentioning that Ivermectin also came in a human-appropriate dosage, as a pill, rather than a paste.  More importantly, doctors have the right to use off-label drugs for treatment of other illnesses if they believe them to be effective.  

The FDA has been ordered to take down the consumer social media warning, “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19.” 

And the FDA must also delete all social media posts and not repost the posts they placed on various social media pages that read, “You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y’all. Stop it.” 

The agency is also required to delete and not repost the Instagram post saying, “You are not a horse. Stop it with the #ivermectin. It’s not authorized for treating #COVID,” 

And the FDA must also remove its Twitter post that reads, “Hold your horses, y’all. Ivermectin may be trending, but it isn’t authorized or approved to treat Covid.  

Those doctors who filed this lawsuit and paid a pretty hefty price concerning their licensure said this campaign led to “attempts by the FDA to influence or intervene in the doctor-patient relationship.”  That’s exactly what our Alaska health care providers who believed in early treatment of Covid-19 said.  

For the doctors who filed and won this lawsuit, it finally vindicates those who are doing what doctors should do—preserve their doctor-patient relationship and reiterates “that the FDA overstepped its regulatory authority by trying to dictate appropriate medical care.”

Let’s not forget the role that the mainstream media played in disparaging those who wanted to try to treat Covid with Ivermectin. In a “fact-checking” article in 2021, the Anchorage Daily News wrote:

“Ivermectin meant for livestock was in high demand at some Alaska feed stores after it gained traction on social media as a purported treatment for COVID-19. The FDA has approved ivermectin in both people and animals for some parasitic worms and for head lice and skin conditions — but the FDA hasn’t approved its use in treating or preventing COVID-19 in humans. The agency has strongly urged people not to use it to treat COVID-19, especially since many were turning to formulations meant for animals, not humans.”

The newspaper continued, attacking Kenai then-Mayor Charlie Pierce and Anchorage Mayor Dave Bronson, “Kenai Peninsula Borough Mayor Charlie Pierce, who has no background in health or medicine, publicly backed the use of the treatment. Speaking at an Anchorage Rotary Club meeting last week, Bronson claimed the treatment worked very well.

“It’s an approved drug and it’s very effective,” Bronson said. “It’s not a horse pill,” the newspaper reported. Across America journalists with no medical training criticized those who supported Ivermectin as a possible treatment. They pushed the government’s propaganda and have never been held accountable.

The legal settlement to this was a long time coming. Or is this an effort by the federal government to simply sweep away evidence of its wrongdoing when it comes to social media misinformation to make it easier for their next go around for, say, Disease X?

Just remember, you are not a horse … and the FDA is not your doctor. 

Linda Boyle, RN, MSN, DM, was formerly the chief nurse for the 3rd Medical Group, JBER, and was the interim director of the Alaska VA. Most recently, she served as Director for Central Alabama VA Healthcare System. She is the director of the Alaska Covid Alliance.

Michael Tavoliero: Must Read Alaska story from 2022 shows what’s really going on in Alaska schools

By MICHAEL TAVOLIERO

As a staunch advocate for constitutional rights and individual freedoms, I hold a libertarian perspective when it comes to our government’s role in protecting our fundamental liberties. Both the Preamble to the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the State of Alaska outline the core principles upon which our government is built, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding the rights and welfare of our citizens.

The Preamble to the United States Constitution begins with the iconic phrase, “We the People,” highlighting that the government derives its authority from the citizens it serves. It outlines key objectives, including establishing justice, ensuring domestic tranquility, providing for the common defense, promoting the general welfare, and securing the blessings of liberty. Similarly, the Alaska Constitution underscores principles such as promoting the common welfare, responsible development and conservation of resources, encouragement of education and morality, and protection of individual rights.

With that said, please read the story at this link.

It is a story of how top-down government is removing the parent/child relationship and replacing it with an artificial outcome paid for by our tax dollars in Alaska.

It is one of the saddest stories I’ve ever read. In fall of 2021, the parents learned their daughter was being transitioned by her public school with a new made up name on her school ID. All of this was behind the backs of these parents. 

Here is an excerpt:

“They (school employees) proceeded to tell me I have no say over anything my daughter wants to go by or what’s in her record or anything,” Susie said. “The only thing I had a say over was what her name was on her transcript. And the only way that changes is with a court-documented name change. But otherwise, their wording to me was that it was illegal for me to insist on a certain name or anything in the yearbook or on her ID.”

What is incredible is that there are untold numbers of parents who are going through this same event. The tragedy behind all of this is the outcome to each child’s life when the light bulb goes off in their maturing brains 5, 10, even 20 years later to realize that the gender transformation is irreversible and Alaska’s public is further decimated by the use of public funds for a completely fraudulent and evil “public purpose”.

The concerns raised in the article shed light on the significant impact of transgender-related policies and practices on families and communities in Alaska. It underscores the pivotal role of state institutions, such as the Alaska Department of Education and Early Development and the Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, in shaping policies that directly affect our children’s well-being. Beyond immediate impacts, these policies prompt reflection on the broader notion of public purpose within our constitutional republic.

In a constitutional republic like Alaska, the government’s purpose extends beyond mere governance; it encompasses safeguarding inherent rights and liberties, including the freedom to live according to one’s conscience and beliefs. When policies are enacted using public funds, they must align with the overarching public purpose of upholding fundamental values and ensuring the welfare of all citizens. 

The allocation of public resources, particularly through programs like Medicaid, necessitates careful consideration of their compatibility with the state’s constitutional principles and values. More potently ascribed to our Article VII, Section 1, and Article IX, Section 6, constitutional guarantees is the primordial concept of “public purpose.” 

Alaska’s youth is the foundation of the very definition of “public purpose.” This includes safeguarding the rights and well-being of this vulnerable population, who are disproportionately affected by certain medical interventions. As such, state leaders, including Gov. Mike Dunleavy and Attorney General Treg Taylor, bear a solemn duty to uphold these principles and address concerns that arise when public resources are utilized in ways that may conflict with them.

Given these considerations, urgent legal action may be necessary to halt practices perceived as harmful or contrary to the public interest. Measures such as obtaining a temporary restraining order followed by a permanent injunction may be crucial to protect the rights and futures of Alaska’s children.

It falls upon state leaders to prioritize the well-being and future of our youth, ensuring that policies and practices align with the values and principles upon which our constitutional republic is built.

Michael Tavoliero is a senior contributor to Must Read Alaska.

Riley Gaines shares her journey on the Must Read Alaska Show

By JOHN QUICK

In this new episode of the Must Read Alaska Show, host John Quick welcomes Riley Gaines, a 12-time All-American swimmer and now a nationally known advocate for women’s sports, who shares her journey from the University of Kentucky to becoming a voice for female athletes.

Riley discusses her pivotal experience at the 2022 NCAA Division 1 Women’s Swimming & Diving Championships, when a transgender male with male genitalia tied her win and was awarded the trophy, and her efforts to protect women’s sports through the Riley Gaines Center, and the challenges she has faced in advocating for common-sense values across America.

She announces on the show that she and other female NCAA swimmers are suing the organization for violating Title IX by allowing transgender Lia Thomas to compete as a woman at the NCAA championships in 2022.

From her appearance on Joe Rogan’s podcast to offering advice to female athletes and finding the confidence to speak out, Riley’s story is a beacon of courage and determination in the face of adversity.

Recently, Riley provided testimony to the House Education Committee on behalf of House Bill 183, which seeks to protect girl athletes from having their trophies and scholarships robbed by transgenders.

Join us as we dive into a conversation about the intersection of sports, gender, and free speech, exploring how Riley’s fight extends beyond the pool to touch the lives of women and athletes nationwide. Watch the interview on Facebook or look for our show wherever you listen to podcasts.

For more about Riley’s mission and how you can support or get involved, visit Riley Gaines Center.

Alex Gimarc: Mike Robbins for Alaska GOP chair

By ALEX GIMARC

Must Read Alaska reported Mike Robbins’ candidacy for Republican Party chairman. 

Robbins is a long-time party activist and local businessman, currently the Executive Director for Anchorage Community Development Authority under Mayor Dave Bronson. He is currently vice chairman of the Alaska Republican Party.

He is a long-term local businessman and entrepreneur, mostly in the media world. His skill stack includes things like advertising, public relations, logistics, marketing, management, radio and television.  These are all valuable skills when dealing with the gaggle of cats we refer to as the Alaska Republican Party.  Note that herding cats is my cynical description of the task at hand. Appears the candidate’s view is more nuanced, referring to it as leading cats, which may be a far smarter approach.  

One example to consider would be his leadership of the Anchorage Community Development Authority (ACDA), the former Anchorage Parking Authority.  Previous head of the Authority was one Andrew Halcro, who served five years. 

Halcro, a left-friendly Republican, enjoyed complete support from the Mayor Ethan Berkowitz and Austin Quinn-Davidson administration and veto-proof democrat majorities on the Anchorage Assembly. It didn’t go well, ending with his fiery resignation letter Mar 2021.  Issues identified by Halcro included financial difficulties, disputes with Muni staff, bad faith dealings, unexplained delays, and failure to keep promises made. In short, everyone else’s fault.

Robbins was nominated to replace Halcro by Bronson and confirmed in 2021. Since that time, stories about dysfunction at the Authority have all but disappeared, which in government is usually a Good Thing. Better yet, the job seems to be getting done. Competence? What a concept.  

Contrast the two situations. Both Halcro and Robbins are local businessmen. Halcro had support from all levels of the Muni government. Robbins has the support of the mayor who appointed him but has to deal with an actively hostile (to all things Bronson) Assembly.  Robbins figured out how to build a working relationship with the Assembly majority not to simply benefit either side of the political divide, but rather to promote and improve Anchorage as a community as a whole.  In other words, doing what the Authority he is leading is chartered to do.      

Bottom line is that the Authority has managed to stay out of the news and get something positive done in a tough environment.  To me, not only does this clearly demonstrate the ability to herd (or lead) cats, but to do so successfully.  Imagine what that skill stack could do with an eager, frustrated, underperforming Republican Party.

There is a web page for Mike Robbins candidacy with both phone and e-mail contacts listed.  He does respond.  

If we are to get back into the business of defeating democrats and removing them from the levers of political power, Mike Robbins would be a good place to start. 

The election for Party Chair takes place at the State Convention here in Anchorage, April 19-21. The choice is yours.  Refusing to make one is also a choice, though a less constructive one. This is going to be a difficult election cycle.  Be prepared. Selecting the right party chair is one way to be properly prepared.

Alex Gimarc lives in Anchorage since retiring from the military in 1997. His interests include science and technology, environment, energy, economics, military affairs, fishing and disabilities policies. His weekly column “Interesting Items” is a summary of news stories with substantive Alaska-themed topics. He was a small business owner and Information Technology professional.

Cover up? Planet Fitness pushes back, says photo of male in Fairbanks women’s locker room is fake

A few short years ago, it was “Believe All Women.” Today, not so much. Now, it’s “believe men who think they are women.”

Planet Fitness is on the record saying that the photo circulating online of a man in the women’s locker room at the Planet Fitness franchise in Fairbanks is fake.

A person from the Libs of TikTok account on X/Twitter called Planet Fitness and asked if the photo was real. The Planet Fitness person, identified as JuJu, responded that it is not real.

“People can take anything online and turn it,” said JuJu. “So we had to, of course, they did a full investigation and that’s why I say based on our nondiscrimination policy, we don’t discriminate against anybody — alien, monster, nobody.”

Watch the Libs of TikTok interview:

When asked to elaborate, JuJu said, “There was a big meeting about it .. and it’s just crazy how much social media can really fool you.”

“Was that a real photo of someone in a Planet Fitness bathroom,” the interviewer said, drilling down further.

“No,” JuJu replied. “No that was not. No. Nope … We were shocked too. And yeah, they had to pull apart the picture and that’s not in the Planet Fitness restroom at all.”

Must Read Alaska spoke with longtime Fairbanks resident Patricia Silva, who took the first photo and posted it online. Not only is the photo real, she said, there’s another photo that a separate client of Planet Fitness has taken of the same man on a subsequent day.

And now there is an account from a third woman, who says that Fairbanks’ Planet Fitness has assigned a staff member to accompany the man into the women’s restroom. When confronted, the staff member told the woman if she was uncomfortable, she should dress in a toilet stall.

Silva said that the attempt to discredit her is a form of retaliation.

“We fought hard for women’s right. Women [suffragettes] in 1848 were jailed and beaten. We’re going backward allowing this new cult to take from us, remove our rights,” Silva said. “It’s like they are the chosen ones to be given preference and favor.

“I truly feel across the board you are a God-birthed child, born male or female, and you have options. This group — we’ll call them transgender or nonbinary — are just as important as me and you,” she said.

“My message to Planet Fitness is if they want to create a safe space, they should create a third space for trans and non-binary They’re telling us that we are not as important, that we have to find a place to hide in if we want our privacy, that this man has all the rights and you, as a woman, are not as important, so you need to remove yourself.”

“Planet Fitness is now slandering and defaming me, my experience, and silencing women’s concerns for their safety in order to protect the current loss of their assets. I have not once slandered or defamed Planet Fitness or this male individual in any video or interview,” Silva said. “I am an advocate for safe spaces for all people. Male, female, transgender and non-binary. They cannot coexist in the same space in order to create a safe space.”

Silva’s membership was cancelled by Planet Fitness after she posted the photo of the man who was shaving at a sink in the women’s locker room, with a young girl nearby. Since then, she has heard from many people who state they have cancelled their gym memberships at the franchise.

FBI contacts passengers of Flight 1282, says they may be victims of a crime in door plug incident

Passengers who were aboard the Alaska Airlines flight in which the door plug blew out mid-flight have received letters from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, telling them they may be a “possible victim of a crime.”

The FBI said an investigation has been opened and due to the “large number of potential victims in this case,” they may not receive another notice by mail. “A criminal investigation can be a lengthy undertaking, and for several reasons, we cannot tell you about its progress at this time.” The letter, dated March 19, informed the passengers about services available to them in the FBI Victim Assistance Program.

Mark Lindquist, the attorney representing 22 of the passengers in a lawsuit against the airlines and Boeing, who made the 737-9 MAX jet with the faulty door plug, released the letter to members of the media this week.

A new Boeing 737-9 MAX, nearly fresh off of the manufacturing line at Boeing, was flying from Portland, Ore. to Ontario, Calif. on Jan. 5 when, as it climbed out of Portland and was at 16,000 feet, a door plug at Row 26 port side blew from the plane, which depressurized quickly. Pilots were able to land safely back in Portland.

Peltola votes against Confidence in Clean Water Act

Alaska Rep. Mary Peltola has voted against a bill that would ensure greater confidence in clean water and put the Environmental Protection Agency back in its original regulatory container.

Since the Obama presidency, the EPA been expanding its authority beyond what was envisioned at its creation under President Richard M. Nixon in 1970.

H.R. 7023, the Creating Confidence in Clean Water Permitting Act was passed by the House of Representatives this week without the support of Democrat Peltola, Alaska’s only member of Congress. The original sponsor of the bill is Rep. David Rouzer of North Carolina.

Rep. Bruce Westerman, a Republican from Arkansas, is the chair of the House Natural Resources Committee who moved the bill forward.

“For far too long, the federal government has abused the Clean Water Act to stall critical infrastructure and energy projects. H.R. 7023 will end the weaponization of the Clean Water Act by making commonsense reforms to cut red tape and streamline the permitting process,” Rep. Westerman said.

Two Democrats voted in favor of the bill, which had the support of all but one Republican in the House. The final vote was 213-205, sending the measure to the Senate.

H.R. 7023 would amend Section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to codify some regulatory provisions that relate to nationwide permits for dredged or fill material.

Section 404 covers a wide range of activities, and even prohibits Alaska coastal communities from dumping snow plowed from city streets into the ocean, even though that snow will be in the ocean within weeks on its own schedule of melting.

The bill is package of commonsense tweaks to Clean Water Act permitting processes that support clean water at the same time reducing regulatory burdens for the approval of energy and infrastructure projects.

For example, H.R. 7023 protects permit holders acting in good faith from unnecessary delays and frivolous lawsuits, and the bill adds transparency and stakeholder participation in the development of water quality standards. It would block the Environmental Protection Agency from vetoing a Clean Water Act Section 404 dredge and fill permit before a permit application is filed or after a permit has already been issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

In Alaska, the EPA has issued preemptive denials of permits, not even allowing a project to make a case for its plan to protect waters. This most famously occurred with the Pebble Project, a gold and copper mine on state mining land in western Alaska.

The EPA power grab started with the Obama Administration EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson’s retroactive veto of a mine in West Virginia two years after the permit was approved and the mine was in operation. The EPA then sought same expanded authority to preemptively veto a project before the proposal can go into permitting in the Pebble case.

H.R. 7023 also sets more reasonable judicial review timelines for Clean Water Act Section 404 dredge and fill permits, so that environmental groups can’t block a project though court delays.

“For far too long, environmental activist groups have used litigation to stall crucial projects,” said Rep. Eric Burlison of Missouri, who added that amendment to the bill. “The Judicial Review Timeline Clarity Act, as included in H.R. 7023, will provide certainty to agencies and communities in order to facilitate speedy authorizations, spur infrastructure development, and safeguard against endless lawsuits which stall crucial projects. Common sense needs to make it into our legal system. When we allow environmentalists to file frivolous lawsuits, it wastes time and resources for projects that the people of our nation depend on. Courts shouldn’t be used as vehicles to impose an environmentalist agenda.”

The Creating Confidence in Clean Water Permitting Act combines five separate bills that had been introduced in the House earlier this year. Among them was the Water Quality Criteria Development and Transparency Act, which seeks to ensure that every stakeholder across the nation has a voice in determining the EPA’s water quality criteria development for permits, said its sponsor, Rep. Burgess Owens.

Nick Begich III, a Republican running against Peltola for Congress, said, “The Clean Water Act has been hijacked by special interests, the EPA, and the federal bureaucracy as a way to end development, both in Alaska and across the United States. Responsible development requires predictability, transparency, and confidence in a reasonable process. Once again, Mary Peltola votes against the interests of Alaska’s working families.”

House passes bill making vandalism against churches a felony

With bipartisan support, the Alaska House passed a bill that would make vandalism on churches and religious property a felony. House Bill 238 is sponsored by Democrat Rep. Andy Josephson of Anchorage, who said in his floor remarks that vandalism against religious property affects an entire congregation, whereas vandalism against a building affects fewer people.

Attacks on churches increased dramatically beginning in May of 2020, following the death of George Floyd, a violent felon and drug addict who died while being restrained by police in Minneapolis. According to the Catholic Vote, 300 attacks against Catholic Churches in America occurred since the Floyd death, which also fed widespread rioting in cities as unrest led up to the 2020 presidential election.

“The attacks include decapitation of statues, arson, satanic graffiti and broken windows. Around 118 incidents of attack have been recorded since the Supreme Court decision which overturned Roe v. Wade in May 2022,” the group said.

The overturn of federal abortion protection in Dobbs v. Jackson was leaked to the media by someone in the U.S. Supreme Court, creating a fresh wave of church vandalism in 2022.

Churches in Alaska were not spared. A church in Eagle River was vandalized three times in an 18-month period after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. A swastika was burned onto the lawn at Mountain City Church. Religious icons in the Emmonak Catholic Church were smashed.

The bill was supported by all but five members, and those opposing it came from the Democrat and Republican camps: Reps. David Eastman, of Wasilla and Will Stapp of Fairbanks were the no votes from the Republican caucus. Ashley Carrick of Fairbanks; Sara Hannan of Juneau and CJ McCormick of Bethel were the Democrats who voted no.

The bill now is in the Senate for consideration.

House passes Kelsey Smith Act so law enforcement agencies can locate victims in grave danger

The Alaska House Majority passed House Bill 316, also known as the Kelsey Smith Act, a measure requiring telecommunications companies to immediately respond to law enforcement requests for location information of victims who are in an ongoing emergency that involves risk of death or serious physical harm. 

Similar measures have passed in 30 states, and are currently pending in three others.

On June 2, 2007, Kelsey Smith was abducted in broad daylight from a Target store in Overland, Kansas. She was raped and murdered. The abduction was captured on the store’s security camera, which made it clear there was a dire emergency of a life-and-death nature. Four days after she disappeared, authorities were able to locate Kelsey’s body after her wireless provider finally, under pressure, released call information from her cell phone. The story was featured on America’s Most Wanted.

“The abduction and murder of Kelsey Smith is heartbreaking and should never happen again. In life-or-death situations it is paramount that our law enforcement agencies have access to life-saving resources; and the fear of legal liability should never stand in the way of rescuing a victim from a life-threatening situation,” said the sponsor of the bill, Rep. Craig Johnson.

The Kelsey Smith Act would make it clear that law enforcement officials, not a phone company, are able to determine if a person is in an actual emergency situation.

While privacy is important, this legislation attempts to balance the ability of law enforcement to help people in grave danger, while ensuring checks are in place to guard against government overreach, Johnson said.

The bill was voted on with 38 yeas, one nay (Rep. David Eastman), and one absent (Rep. Bryce Edgmon). The bill is now in the Senate for consideration.