Wednesday, May 13, 2026
Home Blog Page 387

Biden Interior Dept. locking up 28 million acres in Alaska — more than all of ANWR. But there’s a catch.

In a move that will thrill Democrats and the environmental lobby, the Department of Interior’s final environmental impact statement on the Ambler Access road has gone against the mining project, a project that was actually guaranteed during the passage and signing of the Alaska National Interest Land Claims Act (ANILCA).

The Ambler Access Project is planned as a 211-mile, industrial-access road to reach the state’s Ambler Mining District.

ANILCA, while it established 10 new federal parks, preserves, and monuments throughout Alaska, had in it what President Jimmy Carter called the “Great Compromise,” which guaranteed access to and from the Ambler Mining District for resource development. That guarantee is found in Section 201(4) of ANILCA.

mblerThe Biden Administration, however, locked up 28 million acres of the land from oil and gas, mining, or activities that it says would threaten Alaska Natives, wildlife or any ecosystem that the Administration finds untouchable.

The decision, which is regulation-making by the Bureau of Land Management, came on the same day that the U.S. Supreme Court reversed what’s known as the “Chevron deference.” That decision said the regulatory agencies and their bureaucrats are not allowed to interpret the areas of law that are unclear. How the Chevron reversal will impact the Biden decision to lock up Ambler Mine and more than one and a half times the area of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge remains to be seen.

“Today’s double-whammy attack on Alaska’s resource development opportunities makes 65 times the Biden administration has targeted our state’s energy and economic future,” said Rick Whitbeck, Alaska state director for Power the Future. “This administration has completely kowtowed to radical environmentalists in an effort to gain favor at the ballot box.  Dismissing the fact that Congress mandated access to the Ambler Mining District is a brazen overreach of executive authority.  Placing 28 million acres – an area larger than the entire state of Tennessee – off-limits to responsible development is foolhardy, and only empowers China, Russia and other enemies of our Republic.”

The entire Alaska D.C. delegation expressed disapproval of the decision by the Interior Department.

“Nine years in federal permitting. Access to critical and strategic minerals that are essential for everything from clean energy to national security. A rare opportunity for development in rural Alaska under the highest standards, so we don’t have to import from unstable nations that have no protections for people or the environment,” said Sen. Lisa Murkowski. “Somehow, none of that mattered to the Biden administration on the Ambler project. They have ignored federal law, our national vulnerabilities, and Alaska’s strong record of responsible development, all in the name of election year politics.” 

Sen. Dan Sullivan said, “There he goes again: President Biden’s announcement on the Ambler Road is lawless, hurts Alaska’s future and jobs for our state, undermines America’s national security, and only makes our country more dependent on adversaries like Communist China for critical minerals. These minerals are critically important for our national defense, economy, and renewable energy sector. ANILCA mandates the right-of-way for this road. Career professional staff from the Obama and Trump administrations studied and then approved it after several years. Consultations with Alaskan stakeholder groups were extensive and far-reaching. But no matter, Lower 48 eco-colonialists told Joe Biden to kill the road, and he obeyed. Sanctioning Alaska more than terrorist states, like Iran and Venezuela, and adversaries, like China, is now commonplace policy for the Biden administration. But I’m fighting back. I was able to get strong bipartisan support for my amendment in this year’s NDAA [Defense Authorization Act] that mandates this road and ensures the destiny of this project is controlled by Alaskans.”

Even Democrat Rep. Mary Peltola issues a few words, although she was wishy-washy: “All too often, promises made to Alaska Natives by Congress haven’t been kept; this decision is in contradiction to ANILCA,” Peltola said. “There’s a path forward where local buy-in for this project is real and sustainable. As we continue to work through NDAA, we will seek to affirm permanent private road access that will make these resources available in a way that works for stakeholders in the area.”

The minerals and metals within the Ambler District are crucial to economic and national security, said Murkowski and Sullivan.

  • Imports of copper have risen sharply in recent years. Numerous forecasts indicate there will be a substantial supply gap for copper in the years ahead. The Biden administration has stalled or rejected numerous copper projects across the nation, adding to future supply woes, they pointed out.
  • The dominant supplier of cobalt is the Democratic Republic of the Congo, with which the Biden Administration has signed an agreement to allow the continued use of children as labor, and where horrific worker and environmental conditions exist. The Chinese government controls or owns most of the mines in the DRC and has in the past weaponized the mines by cutting off the exports of rare earth minerals to the United States.

But Biden issued a statement doubling down on his decision to harm Alaska: “Today, my Administration is stopping a 211-mile road from carving up a pristine area that Alaska Native communities rely on, in addition to steps we are taking to maintain protections on 28 million acres in Alaska from mining and drilling,” Biden said in a statement on the social media platform X. “These natural wonders demand our protection.”

Supreme Court rules in favor of local homeless encampment laws and overturns the vast regulatory authority of feds in ‘Chevron doctrine’ decision

Two major Supreme Court decisions were issued on Friday morning that impact Alaska.

In the first, the court ruled that the city of Grant Pass, Oregon (and others) can enforce a ban on public squatting on city properties, and that such bans do not constitute “cruel and unusual punishment.”

The court majority opinion, written by Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, said that the enforcement of laws regulating camping on public property is “commonplace” and not barred by the Eighth Amendment.

Gorsuch wrote that while homelessness is a complex issue, the city’s limited fines for first-time offenders, the ability to trespass repeat offenders from public parks, and a maximum of 30 days in jail for violators are punishments that don’t bring “terror, pain or disgrace.”

As is often the case, the three liberal women on the court dissented.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor called sleeping a “biological necessity, not a crime,” and wrote that for people with no homes, the city’s laws punish them for the status of being homeless. “That is unconscionable and unconstitutional,” she wrote. She was joined in her dissent by Justices Elena Kana and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

But the conservatives on the court cited an amicus brief from liberal California Gov. Gavin Newsom, and said that “policymakers need access to the full panoply of tools in the policy toolbox,” and need latitude to work through the complicated issues of homelessness.

The high court said that previous rulings by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in a Boise, Idaho case and in the Grants Pass case, which had limited what municipalities could do in terms of banning public encampments on streets, parks, and sidewalks, may have actually increased the homelessness problem by taking away one important tool for cities that are responding to the growing crises in homelessness.

“In Portland, for example, residents report some unsheltered persons ‘often return within days’ of an encampment’s clearing,” Gorsuch wrote. And there wasn’t anything Portland could do about it, due to the Ninth Circuit ruling.

Anchorage had signed onto the lawsuit with several other cities in support of Grants Pass. That brief is at this link.

In a second case that impacts Alaska, the Supreme Court overturned what is known as the “Chevron doctrine.”

In a 1984 decision, Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, the Supreme Court had said that courts should defer to an agency’s “reasonable interpretation of an ambiguous statute.” That gave license to bureaucrats to interpret laws their own way.

Now, in Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, the Supreme Court has held that courts may not grant those vast powers of interpretation to agencies, simply because a law is ambiguous.

Critics of that Chevron ruling say it gives unelected federal bureaucrats too much power in writing regulations. Regulatory overreach has stopped or slowed down projects in Alaska such as Willow and this ruling may even impact EPA decisions on Pebble Project and the Ambler Road to the proposed mining areas.

The case that ended up overturning Chevron Deference Doctrine involved a 2020 federal regulation that requires owners of fishing vessels in the Atlantic herring fishery to pay for federal onboard monitors while they’re at sea, which can cost more than $700 a day per vessel.

The National Marine Fisheries Service had created the rule under a 1976 law to force the cost of monitoring back on the fishing vessels. But the Alantic ishing fleet challenged the regulation, saying the fisheries service lacked the authority to mandate the industry to pay for the monitoring the NMFS was requiring.

“Chevron is overruled. Courts must exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority, as the [Administrative Procedure Act] requires,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote for the majority opinion, adding that the Chevron decision was a “judicial invention that required judges to disregard their statutory duties” to be the ones who interpret the laws passed by Congress or other jurisdictions.

The three liberal women justices — Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson — dissented in this ruling as well, siding with the Biden Administration, which asked the Supreme Court to leave Chevron deference intact. The Justice Department argued that the Chevron doctrine framework allows “experts” at federal agencies, who are more knowledgeable than judges, to interpret statutes.

Headline writers who are Trump haters are now in ‘Replace Biden’ mode after disastrous debate

There was simply no spinning it for the mainstream media after Thursday night. President Joe Biden was an old, old man muttering nonsense, and even CNN and the New York Times could see it.

How bad was it for the president with the reporter-and-editor class that usually protects him? Here are some of the brutal headlines from Friday morning:

New York Times

  • Biden’s Struggles in Debate Alarm Democrats
  • Shaky Performance Against Trump Reinforces Doubts
  • President Biden sought to reassure Democrats after the debate.
  • Former President Trump’s attacks were frequently false, lacked context or were vague enough to be misleading.
  • For U.S. allies, the debate renewed concerns about America’s stability.
  • The debate has left Democratic donors wondering about a Plan B.
  • ‘God Help Us’: 12 Writers Rate Biden’s Performance at the First Presidential Debate
  • THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN: Joe Biden Is a Good Man and a Good President. He Must Bow Out of the Race.
  • PAUL KRUGMAN: The Best President of My Adult Life Needs to Withdraw
  • MICHELLE COTTLE, ROSS DOUTHAT AND EZRA KLEIN: Is Biden Too Old? America Got Its Answer.

Washington Post

  • Democrats panic over Biden, doubting his future
  • ‘There was a slow start’: Harris reacts to Biden’s debate performance
  • Could Biden be replaced as the Democratic nominee?
  • Shares of Trump media company spike nearly 11 percent in premarket trading
  • Can Biden recover from his damaging performance?
  • Perspective: It’s time for Jill Biden to have a hard talk with her husband

Drudge Report

  • OPERATION: REPLACE BIDEN DEMS SCRAMBLE WITH 130 DAYS TO GO! DEBATE CATASTROPHE
  • WHITE HOUSE SPINS WORST PERFORMANCE IN HISTORY: JOE HAS A COLD…
  • U.S. Allies Watch With Shaking Heads and a Question: What Now?
  • China Mocks: ‘Very Entertaining’…
  • Axelrod Tells Republicans, If Biden’s Replaced, ‘You Guys Are in Trouble’…
  • Drudge Poll: Who Should Replace Biden? (Hillary Clinton, Kamala Harris, Gavin Newsom, Gretchen Whitmer, Other)

CNN

  • Biden disappoints, Trump lies and deflects
  • Biden’s age problem got worse, Trump ducks on deportations and other key moments to know
  • Live Updates ‘It’s hard to debate a liar,’ Biden says
  • Reaction Biden’s debate performance sets off alarm bells for Democrats
  • CNN Flash Poll Majority of debate watchers say Trump outperformed Biden

Anchorage Daily News

  • A halting Biden tries to confront an untruthful Trump in debate but sparks Democratic anxiety about his candidacy

How bad was it for Biden? Best pundit comments of the night …

The first debate of the presidential election cycle had barely started when the pundits of X/Twitter were at it on the keyboard. They had plenty of material to work with, as President Joe Biden fumbled, mumbled, and was mostly incoherent.

The debate was hosted by CNN in Atlanta and there was no studio audience. Pollsters reported that 70% or more of the audience for the debate were Trump supporters, while Biden voters generally chose not to watch.

Here were some of the best lines from the X pundits as the spectacle unfurled on CNN:

Jesse Kelly: We all thought Joe Biden was a Camp David resting but clearly he spent the last week in Vegas with Charlie Sheen.

Rick Whitbeck: Our Commander in Chief. They totally screwed up his meds tonight…

Jeremy Boreing: So… It’s Michelle, right?

Bill Ackman: I have to say this is embarrassing not just for @POTUS Biden but also for our country.

Ann Coulter: Even CNN can’t save Biden from this performance.

Charlie Kirk: Gavin Newsom is skyrocketing on PredictIt right now.

Greg Gutfeld: Holy sh*t.

Tim Murtaugh: Any media want to take a stab at calling Biden’s performance a “cheap fake” this time?

Jesse Kelly: This might be it for Joe. Man. This is brutal.

Matt Maćkowiak: Senior Dem lobbyist to me just now: “There are going to be multiple members of congress that come out tomorrow and say Biden needs to step aside. For the good of the country.”

Scott Adams: I’ve never see Biden worse. Bad time to find his bottom.

Charles C Cook: Robert Hur deserves an apology.

Russell Brand: We’re 17 minutes in, and Joe Biden is discussing the problem of people being raped by their brothers and sisters, which is quite an extraordinary yet niche topic to discuss.

Sarah Isgur: Forget the election, this is heading into 25th amendment territory.

Kayleigh McEnany: How in the world did 16 people sit at Camp David with Biden for a week and think this was a good idea? Political malpractice.

Ann Coulter: CNN moderators are surprisingly great. Not wildly unfair, as I expected. Good questions. LOVE the mic cut, LOVE no audience.

Michael Steele: This is painful. Trump full of sh!t and Biden can’t find his.

Tim Murtaugh: This is as bad a blowout as any debate I’ve ever seen. The first 30 minutes are key for catching the most viewers and Biden has just been a muttering ghost of his former self. It’s really, really bad. Trump is calm, firm, and in command. The contrast is undeniable.

BIDEN: *rambles incoherently about his failure to secure the border*

TRUMP: “I really don’t know what he said at the end of that sentence. I don’t think he knows what he said either.”

Amy Walter: Odds of a September 10 debate are close to zero about now.

Matt Walsh: That was it. The debate is over. Biden can’t even finish his sentence. Trails off into nonsense. Never seen a presidential candidate freeze like that. A moment that will be remembered forever. And it’s only going to get worse for Biden from here.

Your comments here:

Fifth Republican women’s club endorses Nick Begich

Five out of seven Republican women’s clubs in Alaska have endorsed Nick Begich for Congress, as the Alaska-born Republican tries to unseat Democrat Rep. Mary Peltola. The most recent club is the Matsu Republican Women’s Club, a legacy club of activists established in 1947.

“During the past 4 years Nick has campaigned passionately, traveling to all corners of Alaska, and meeting Alaskans where they live. By listening to Alaskans, he has learned about their concerns, and has been sharing ideas for moving Alaska and the country forward to a brighter future,” the club wrote. “Nick’s drive and passion for Alaska and the important role of Congressman for all Alaskans is evident as he consistently shows up at many functions all over the state, welcoming questions
on every subject. He is well-informed, well-spoken, and his stances on the issues reflect his conservative values.”

The other clubs that have endorsed Begich are Valley Republican Women, the two Kenai clubs and the Fairbanks club.

“In addition to his strong knowledge base, and because of his passion for Alaska, Nick Begich understands the importance of unity as we move toward the General election. He has vowed to withdraw if he places behind other Republican candidates in the Primary Election on August 20, 2024, to not split the vote in the General Election on November 5, 2024. No other candidate has made this vow,” the club wrote. “Nick Begich has proven he is an America-First candidate and is ready for the monumental task of representing Alaska and getting our country on a better track; the Matsu Republican Women’s Club Est 1947 shares with him in support for Donald Trump for President of the United States.”

While over 70% of the Republican women’s political groups that are voting members of the Alaska Republican Party State Central Committee have endorsed Nick Begich, Nancy Dahlstrom, who filed to run against him in November, has gotten the support of a large international police union.

Dahlstrom has a history of support from Big Labor unions. Through her connection to Gov. Mike Dunleavy, she has won the endorsement of former President Donald Trump.

But neither Trump nor Dunleavy have convinced the women activists in the Alaska Republican Party to support Dahlstrom, who has not pledged to drop from contention if she comes in third in the Alaska open primary. Begich has repeatedly made that pledge.

NTSB warning letter puts Boeing on notice over release of information not disclosed to investigators

The National Transportation Safety Board issued a stern letter sanctioning the Boeing Co. for sharing information with the media about the Jan. 5 door plug blowout on a Boeing 737-9 MAX — information it had evidently never disclosed to the NTSB.

The National Transportation Safety Board letter said Boeing “blatantly violated” the agency’s investigative procedures and regulations, and had violated a signed agreement to not provide information to the public without the NTSB being in the loop.

“Notwithstanding these requirements, we learned that on June 25, 2024, Ms. Elizabeth Lund, Senior Vice President, Quality, Boeing Commercial Airplanes, gave a long-planned media briefing without the knowledge or consent ofthe NTSB at which she released non-public investigative information and made unsubstantiated speculations about possible causes of the Jan. 5 door—plug blowout, which is directly at issue in the ongoing investigation. We have verified that part of the released information was either inaccurate or unknown to the NTSB while other parts were not previously disclosed to the public. Such a release or withholding of critical information from our investigators are blatant violations of NTSB’s regulations and the party agreement. This disregard of the federal regulations and rules governing NTSB investigations cannot be tolerated,” the NTSB said.

During the incident, an Alaska Airlines jet departing Portland International Airport lost its door plug while over Hillsborough, Ore. and had to return to make an emergency landing in Portland. There were no injuries but many passengers have sued over the trauma.

The agency also scolded Boeing for an additional breach of regulations:

“We are also aware of statements that Boeing Chief Engineer, Howard McKenzie, made on June 18, 2024, concerning the Dutch roll that a Southwest Airlines 737 Max 8 recently experienced. Specifically, Mr. McKenizie stated that the event ‘has nothing to do with design or manufacturing.’ The NTSB is currently investigating that accident and therefore, parties are prohibited from making any comments regarding the cause ofthe event or otherwise conveying investigative information. The NTSB has not made any such determination, and our investigators have not yet ruled out design or manufacturing issues as contributing to this event,” the NTSB wrote.

This is the second warning the NTSB has issued to Boeing this year “regarding its flagrant violation of the NTSB rules. It is crucial that the investigation speaks with one voice — that of the NTSB — to prevent the release of inaccurate, misleading, unconfirmed, and out—of—context investigative information to the media, public, and lawmakers, which is exactly what occurred during Boeing’s media briefing,” the agency said. “In the briefing, Boeing also portrayed the NTSB investigation as a search to locate the individual responsible for the door plug work. This is false and misleads the public regarding the purpose and scope of the NTSB’s purposes. The NTSB is instead focused on the probable cause of the accident, not placing blame on any individual or assessing liability. When incorrect information is released, we must correct the record, leading to confusion among our stakeholders.”

The NTSB says it will be subpoenaing Lund and other witnesses during scheduled August hearings. NTSB has also notified the Justice Department regarding the release of unauthorized investigation information.

The letter was signed by the director of the Office of Aviation Safety.

NYT: Biden Administration pressured world transgender health association to eliminate age restrictions for kids on sex-change surgeries

The New York Times reported it has emails showing the Biden Administration’s Department of Health and Human Services pressured the World Professional Association for Transgender Health to eliminate age restrictions on surgeries that mutilate the sexual characteristics of teens.

WPATH in 2021 released guidelines on transgender surgical procedures that had age limits for patients, including “14 for hormonal treatments, 15 for mastectomies, 16 for breast augmentation or facial surgeries, and 17 for genital surgeries or hysterectomies.”

“Email excerpts from members of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health recount how staff for Adm. Rachel Levine, assistant secretary for health at the Department of Health and Human Services and herself a transgender woman, urged them to drop the proposed limits from the group’s guidelines and apparently succeeded,” the newspaper wrote.

Levine is the highest-level transgender in the United States government. His job at DHHS appears to be focused on LGBTQAI+ health matters almost exclusively. At 65, Levine was born male and went through most of his life as a male, before taking hormones and undergoing surgical procedures to appear as a woman, changing his name to Rachel and his legal identity to female. He holds a distinctive position in U.S. politics, using his bully pulpit at the nation’s highest level to champion the mutilation of minors and he frequently argues that such treatments can be life-saving.

The emails in question came to light in court filings submitted by Dr. James Cantor, a Toronto-based psychologist and frequent critic of transgender surgery on children. Cantor’s filings supported a 2022 law signed by Alabama Republican Gov. Kay Ivey that bans transgender treatment for minors, a law that has been challenged in court on behalf of sex-surgery-performing doctors by groups such as the Southern Poverty Law Center and GLAD; the lawsuit can be read at this link.

Nate Silver predicts: Trump favored over Biden

By BRETT ROWLAND | THE CENTER SQUARE

Statistician Nate Silver said Wednesday that the 2024 presidential election wasn’t a toss up, but rather the contest favored former President Donald Trump over incumbent Joe Biden. 

Silver, who made his name at the New York Times and later poll aggregator FiveThirtyEight, said the model he built suggests Trump has an edge over Biden, even though Silver said he doesn’t want Trump to be president and doesn’t plan to vote for Trump. 

“I think it’s important to be up front, because I’ve been rather lucky in one sense in my election forecasting career,” he wrote in a Silver Bulletin post. “I began making election forecasts in 2008, and in literally every presidential year since then, I haven’t really had to deal with a conflict between what I personally wanted to see happen and what my forecast said. This year, I do have that conflict. The candidate who I honest-to-God think has a better chance (Trump) isn’t the candidate I’d rather have win (Biden).”

Silver’s model came the day before the first presidential debate. Jake Tapper and Dana Bash of CNN will host the debate, which is expected to last 90 minutes. There will be no live audience, the first time in decades.

Big Labor, Big D: Dahlstrom donated to AFL-CIO President Vince Beltrami, Democrat Sen. Johnny Ellis

The records at the Alaska Public Offices Commission and the Federal Election Commission show that congressional candidate Nancy Dahlstrom, a Republican, made a campaign donation to then-president of the Alaska AFL-CIO Vince Beltrami, when he was challenging a Republican for Alaska Senate.

Beltrami, now retired as a Big Labor leader, had vigorously opposed nearly every Republican who ever filed for office in Alaska, and even opposed Sen. Cathy Giessel when he ran against her, before the two became solid political allies.

The Beltrami donation occurred in 2016. It came three years after another donation Dahlstrom made to an Anchorage Democrat, when she cut a check to then-Sen. Johnny Ellis.

In 2012, Dahlstrom made 30 contributions to the presidential race of Mitt Romney, who is considered by many conservatives to be Utah’s version of Sen. Lisa Murkowski.

Romney is the only presidential candidate that Dahlstrom has ever supported. Her Republican opponent Nick Begich has donated $1,500 to the Trump campaign.

Dahlstrom doesn’t have a long record of political donations, and most of the candidates she has supported have been Republican — with some interesting exceptions, including Big Labor leader Don Etheridge.

At the same time, Dahlstrom has enjoyed tremendous support from Big Labor during her various campaigns for elected office.

Thirty percent of Dahlstrom’s support for her House campaign in 2018 came from Big Labor groups. A handful of them are shown here: