Tuesday, April 28, 2026
Home Blog Page 1118

Fight night: Bronson debates Dunbar (and moderator Palsha) in lively ‘conversation’

Dave Bronson, running for Anchorage mayor, found he was debating both his opponent Forrest Dunbar and moderator Rebecca Palsha, as the KTUU-Alaska’s News Source “conversation” devolved into an argument between a “wise dad” and an “angry teen” Wednesday.

The debate contrasted the styles and perspectives of two who would lead Anchorage over the next three years. Bronson described himself as a blue-collar worker, commercial pilot, military guy, and a leader who would set Anchorage on a better path. The runoff election is underway, with ballots in mailboxes and a deadline of May 11 to get them into drop boxes.

[Read: Many don’t know there’s a runoff election for mayor]

Dunbar badgered Bronson for having campaign get-togethers without masks, and promoted his own accomplishments as an Assemblyman for the city. Dunbar became increasingly agitated, and the longer the debate went, the faster he spoke and the more frustrated he appeared.

Asked how he would have handled the pandemic differently, Bronson said he would have stuck with the original plan of social distancing to not allow the case rates to exceed the medical community’s ability to deal with it, pointing to the number of ICU beds as a barometer.

Bronson explained that at first the policy goal of the mayor had been to “flatten the curve. But over the summer, the rules changed.”

The municipal policy shifted to, “No one was supposed to get this virus. This would be the first virus in the history of the world that no one was supposed to get, I guess, by government edict,” Bronson said.

Of the handling of the epidemic in Anchorage, Bronson continued: “We have shut down businesses, we’ve destroyed lives. We’ve shut down our churches and our schools,” Bronson said. “I’ve never seen a community in worse shape than this community.”

Dunbar, however, defended the municipality’s policy, saying the pandemic was a first in history.

“This was a once in a lifetime event, a pandemic unlike anything we had ever seen before. It was a deadly and dangerous virus and it still is. The good news is that the people of Anchorage, for the most part, came together to do the right thing. People social distanced. People wore masks. People worked together to try to prevent the spread of this infection and because of that Anchorage had some of the lowest levels of hospitalizations and deaths for a city our size in the country.”

Dunbar admitted that the municipality had made mistakes that prevented the reopening of schools in the fall. He did not elaborate on those mistakes but said “then we worked very hard, particularly in December to get schools open, to get churches open, to get businesses open.”

That was not true. He fought opening the city in December. Must Read Alaska has the video.

Dunbar said that “Anchorage is now basically down to a mask mandate only.” That happened this week during an Assembly meeting, when his campaign ally Assemblyman Chris Constant moved to remove nearly all edicts governing businesses in Anchorage. It was seen by critics as a gesture to save Dunbar’s campaign.

[Read: Desperate Dunbar: Assembly throws his campaign a Hail Mary]

Bronson, throwing a punch of his own, said, “You’ve used your experience to destroy the city.”

As for Dunbar’s 10-point plan to rebuild the city, Bronson replied that the real 10-point plan needed is to get 10 new leaders at the city — 9 on the Assembly and a new mayor.

Moderator Rebecca Palsha threw softball questions at Dunbar and saved her hardballs for Bronson, and she and co-moderator Mike Ross remained mute while Dunbar interrupted Bronson repeatedly and then would not yield the mic.

Throughout the evening, Dunbar became more and more agitated. When asked why he wasn’t endorsed by the police union, Dunbar was visibly angry. He called Bronson a liar several times, and Palsha and Ross allowed it. But at once point Bronson said, “You don’t have the sense God gave an anvil.”

Dunbar finally lost his composure at the end of the debate, when Bronson explained that Dunbar’s statements about the U.S. Constitution were what finally drove Bronson to file for mayor.

Dunbar interrupted him, “I did not say that. I didn’t say that.” Dave replied, “We have the video.” Must Read Alaska‘s YouTube channel, in fact, captured that video from a meeting last summer, when Dunbar was describing the racist origins of America and how our constitutional law is based on racist policy. Roll tape:

Redistricting board members decide to gerrymander Judicial Council process to block governor’s nominee Kristie Babcock

11

Two members of the Alaska Redistricting Board testified today against Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s nominee to the Alaska Judicial Council. Nicole Borromeo and Melanie Bahnke testified in House Judiciary Committee that nominee Kristie Babcock should be disqualified because she does not live in Fairbanks.

Babcock, a long-time business leader and political activist, is from Soldotna, although she has lived in Juneau and was raised in the Mat-Su Valley. There’s never been a woman from the Kenai Peninsula who has served on the Judicial Council.

In fact, the Alaska Bar Association, which controls three of the seats on the Council for the past 60 years has never appointed anyone except lawyers from Anchorage, Southeast, and Fairbanks.

Yet all of a sudden, the two members of the Redistricting Board feel there needs to be geographic diversity on the council.

If it looks political, it’s no wonder. Last year, Speaker Bryce Edgmon appointed Borromeo to the redistricting board, which is in charge of political boundaries after the completion of the 2020 U.S. Census. She is a lawyer and one of the most radical members to ever serve on the redistricting board. Borromeo signed the Recall Dunleavy petition in 2019.

Also last year, Chief Justice Joel Bolger appointed Melanie Bahnke to the redistricting board. It’s Bolger’s position that the Judicial Council is replacing, as he retires this spring, raising a question about whether Bahnke has been pressured to oppose Babcock. Bahnke has also signed the Recall Dunleavy petition. Bolger has been a foe of Dunleavy.

Both women represent what’s known as “rural” interests, although Borromeo actually lives in Anchorage, while Bahnke lives in Nome.

The two women were savvy enough to know they could not go after Babcock simply because she is married to Tuckerman Babcock, the former chairman of the Alaska Republican Party and a former chief of staff to Dunleavy. Instead, the women said that there needs to be regional diversity on the board.

Kristie Babcock penned an open letter to the Alaska Legislature, which Must Read Alaska obtained today:

In her letter, Babcock said that she had observed the Alaska Judicial Council appointment process since 1990, when she was the director of Boards and Commissions under Governors Walter Hickel and Frank Murkowski. In that role, she had been responsible for reviewing dozens of applications to the council.

“Never in these 32 years has there been the level of attention given geographic representation discussed now. I find this curious,” Babcock wrote to the Legislature on Wednesday.

The council has but three public seats of the seven seats. Three are controlled by the Alaska Bar Association. The Chief Justice has the seventh seat, and runs the council.

“There have been numerous times in history where certain regions don’t have a representative. There has never been any problem identified with that,” Babcock wrote, giving four examples:

“During the council’s 62-year history there have been only 18 of  62 years that someone from rural western Alaska or rural northwest Alaska served. There have been 14 total years, including a 10-year period and a 4-year period, in which there was no public member from the greater Anchorage municipality. There was a total of 17 years in which there was no public member from Fairbanks or the Interior, including a 7-year stretch and a 10-year stretch.  There has never been a woman from the Kenai Peninsula appointed. Where was the outage then? Where was the outrage over this ‘lack of geographical representation’ over the past 62 years?  There wasn’t any. Is the outrage being voiced now by a small but vocal number of attorneys and retired judges really about geography?” Babcock wrote.

“I’m really not sure why any lawyers or former judges feel they should weigh in on this public seat when the private Bar Association already control three seats directly, which are not even subject to legislative confirmation. Maybe there is some merit to pressing the Bar Association to have at least one of their three members come from rural Alaska, because since statehood they have never done so.  In fact, the Bar has never selected members from anywhere other than Fairbanks Anchorage, and Southeast,” she said.

“Frankly, as a private citizen willing to volunteer and asked to do this job, I find these new arguments from a small but loud group of lawyers undignified and inappropriate. Doesn’t the Bar Association already appoint 3 attorneys to the council, not subject to legislative confirmation.  Do they really need to choose the public members too?” she asked.

“I would ask that my qualifications be judged on their own merit. I ask that my competence and character be judged, I ask that the respectful consideration I give to my customers, my neighbors, my colleagues and friends be shown to me.  I ask that the care I have for all of Alaska be judged for itself — that we not pit region against region, rural against urban, Alaskan against Alaskan. I have lived in Anchorage, Juneau, Wasilla, Kenai, Soldotna and the town of Ninilchik (pop. 836).  I love the small coastal community I call home (Soldotna pop. 4649, Kenai pop. 7742).  My children and immediate family members have gone to school at UA Southeast, Fairbanks and Anchorage. Alaska has my heart, all of Alaska has my heart,” Babcock wrote, asking that she be judged on her merits, not on her address.

Double dipping: Reps. Liz Snyder, Geran Tarr dabbling in state employment on the side

22

Alaska lawmakers cannot hold two taxpayer-funded positions at the same time. It says so in the Alaska Constitution. That means if you work for government entities, you can’t at the same time serve in elected office.

Sen. Roger Holland had to quit his job at Department of Transportation before he filed for office last year for Senate Seat N. So did Sen. Josh Revak, when he filed for the House of Representatives District 25 back in 2018.

But Rep. Liz Snyder, District 27, is serving in the Alaska House of Representatives and is advertising for enrollment for a class she will teach in the fall at University of Alaska Anchorage. Her class is advertised with her aka name, Elizabeth Hodges.

Snyder’s public official financial disclosure shows she was paid up to $100,000 last year by the University of Aalska.

Rep. Geran Tarr, District 19, who lists herself as adjunct faculty at UAA. Tarr’s public financial disclosure shows she made between $2,000 and $5,000 last year for classes she taught, while she also served as a legislator. She’s been teaching classes at UAA since 1999, and has been a legislator since 2013.

In 2018, Snyder was quoted in a news article saying she knew that she could not hold both an elected position and another state position. That’s why she wanted clarity about a sabbatical position she had taken with the university while running for office.

“You cannot hold two taxpayer-funded positions at the same time,” Snyder said at the time. But this year, she’s teaching an upper-level class between August and December.

Must Read Alaska has asked the University of Alaska Anchorage to clarify whether Snyder and Tarr are indeed still employed at UAA, as they appear to be on various official rosters.

The Alaska Constitution lays out the sideboards:

SECTION 5. No legislator may hold any other office or position of profit under the United States or the state. During the term for which elected and for one year thereafter, no legislator may be nominated, elected, or appointed to any other office or position of profit which has been created, or the salary or emoluments of which have been increased, while he was a member. This section shall not prevent any person from seeking or holding the office of Governor, Lieutenant Governor, or member of Congress. This section shall not apply to employment by or election to a constitutional convention.

Fact-checking Dunbar: Has Anchorage been safer since 2016, when he joined Assembly?

9

Real property crimes are on the decline, claims the new ad for Forrest Dunbar, who wants Anchorage residents to vote for him for mayor in order to have a safe Anchorage. Dunbar has been on the Anchorage Assembly since 2016, and his current term ends in 2022. He is running in the May 11 runoff against Dave Bronson, and his ad appears to be giving him credit for a drop in crime.

Dunbar’s claim isn’t born out by the data, unless he is cherry-pick the numbers of 2020, when Anchorage residents were ordered to stay in their homes. City-Data says that Anchorage is safer than just 3 percent of all cities in America.

  • 2018 – the Anchorage crime rate was 1,309 per 100,000, an 8.84 percent increase over 2017.
  • 2017 – the Anchorage crime rate was 1,203 per 100, a 5.17 percent increase from 2016.
  • 2016 – the Anchorage crime rate was 1,144 per 100,000, a 6.84 percent increase from 2015.
  • All years that Dunbar has been in office, crime has increased year over year, according to MacroTrends.net.

CityScout says Anchorage is one of the least safe cities in America:

Then there’s the “lockdown effect” of 2020: The crime rate for 2020 was an anomaly because the mayor of Anchorage ordered people to stay in their homes due to the Covid-19 pandemic. He closed businesses, especially bars and restaurants, and ordered those who could to work from home. That led to a drop in property crime and just 18 homicides, which was half of the number of homicides committed in 2019.

It’s a phenomenon seen nationwide.

According to CNBC, “Chicago’s crime declined 10% after the pandemic struck, a trend playing out globally as cities report stunning crime drops in the weeks since measures were put into place to slow the spread of the virus. Even among regions that have the highest levels of violence outside a war zone, fewer people are being killed and fewer robberies are taking place.” In other words, if you lock people in their homes, they won’t go commit robberies.

“The U.S. virus epicenter in New York saw major crimes — murder, rape, robbery, burglary, assault, grand larceny and car theft — decrease by 12% from February to March. In Los Angeles, 2020 key crimes statistics were consistent with last year’s figures until the week of March 15, when they dropped by 30%, CNBC reported.

“There’s a lot fewer opportunities for criminals to take advantage of,” said Joe Giacalone, a former New York Police Department sergeant and instructor at John Jay College of Criminal Justice. “Most burglars, they wait for you to leave the house.”

Dunleavy bill would get more land into the hands of Alaskans

14

 Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy introduced legislation on Wednesday creating another approach that offers Alaskans the ability to purchase or lease state land for recreational cabin sites, advancing his priority to “put Alaska land into Alaska hands.”

“The ability to own land is a core American value, which this plan supports by helping fulfil so many Alaskans’ dreams of owning a piece of the Last Frontier,” Dunleavy said. “Alaska has vast amounts of land, but only three percent it is in private hands, less than in any other state. This bill is an important tool for removing burdensome obstacles and putting Alaska land into Alaska hands.”

The governor’s legislation House Bill 195 and Senate Bill 133 allow eligible Alaskans to nominate up to 10 acres from the millions of acres of vacant, unappropriated, or unreserved state lands for the Department of Natural Resources to offer for sale or lease as a remote recreational site.

Applicants would be required to make a 5 percent down payment, cover survey and appraisal costs, and pay fair market value for the land. Land leases could be extended or converted to sales contracts using long-term state-managed financing.

“We support the governor’s efforts to broaden the base of private land ownership, and are excited to help him continue unlocking Alaska,” said DNR Commissioner Corri Feige. “While the state’s economy benefits from commercial resource development, this new legislation benefits individual Alaskans by expanding their opportunities to better enjoy our great outdoors by owning private recreational parcels.”

The legislation supplements existing state land sales programs, which include twice-annual land auctions, over-the-counter sales, subdivision sales, and sale of agricultural land. It expedites recreational site sales by removing the burdensome requirement for formal best-interest findings, while protecting the state’s right to repossess land and make it available to others should the applicant not meet lease or sale terms.

SB 133 has been scheduled for its first hearing, in Senate Resources Committee on April 28.

Masked for your safety. Really?

By CRAIG E. CAMPBELL

They congratulated themselves at the Centers for Disease Control when they announced vaccinated people may attend small outdoor gathering without wearing masks. 

Claiming science has shown the vaccine is effective most of the time, the masters of science and disease control proclaimed this was a significant step towards returning to normal.  Everyone of us should drop to our knees, face towards Atlanta, and praise our most gifted servants at the CDC for granting us this newfound freedom.

Without the vigilant management of this horrendous coronavirus by these gods of government, the human race would have faced extinction. After all, Covid-19 is one of the most deadly diseases to ever infect humanity, they would lead you to believe, so without the government clamp-down to destroy businesses, taking away our constitutional rights to assembly, and ensuring we did not make irresponsible individual decisions that may harm others, or even kill us, humanity would have faced termination.  

It sounds like a truly honorable and noble pursuit by our government elitists:  Save humanity from the deadly coronavirus pandemic.  Bravo…Bravo.

But was the coronavirus really such a deadly disease that our government leaders needed to violate our constitutional protections of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? Was it such a deadly disease that we had to implement draconian restrictions on society that caused increased suicides and depression; increased violence and civil unrest; increased unemployment with a disproportionate impact on minorities, and has nearly made the United States a bankrupt nation through numerous trillion dollar relief bailouts?

Let’s look at the CDC data on global pandemic deaths, as of March 2021 from the following chart:

Let me break down the numbers:

  • Black Plague – 200 million deaths out of a world population of 0.39 billion.
  • Smallpox – 56 million deaths out of a world population of .46 billion.
  • Spanish Flu – 45 million deaths out of a world population of 1.82 billion
  • HIV/AIDS – 30 million deaths out of a world population of 4.46 billion
  • Covid-19  – 2.7 million deaths out of a world population of 7.9 billion

So, Covid-19 has not been nearly as deadly a pandemic as all previous global pandemics, yet our freedoms as Americans have been systematically hand-cuffed for over a year in the “interest of public health.”  COVID-19 primarily attacks the elderly and those with underlying conditions, especially conditions like heart or lung diseases, or diabetes.  

The fact is, over 90 percent of those who died from Covid-19 in the United States were over the age of 55, most with other medical conditions. Did we really need to bring the United States to the brink of collapse over Covid-19? 

The CDC has constantly moved the goalposts on wearing masks. Why would this be?  Forgive me for being pessimistic of government, but maybe this past year has been a test to determine how much compliance government can achieve by placing a fear into society and exaggerating the impact of a disease to determine the level of compliance control government can gain over our lives.  

As to the mask themselves, how effective have they really been?  Here is a comparison of state Covid death rates which documents the uselessness of strict mask mandates:

  • New York (Strict Mask Mandates) – Death rate of 0.0027 – 51,386 deaths out of a population of 19.3 million
  • New Jersey (Strict Mask Mandates) – Death rate of 0.0027 – 25,301 deaths out of a population of 8.9 million.
  • Michigan (Strict Mask Mandates) – Death rate of 0.0019 – 18,449 deaths out of a population of 9.9 million
  • Texas (Relaxed Mask Mandates) – Death rate of 0.0017 – 48,966 deaths out of a population of 29.0 million
  • Florida (Relaxed Mask Mandates) – Death rate of 0.0016 – 34,848 deaths out of a population of 21.6 million
  • California (Strict Mask Mandates) – Death rate of 0.0015 – 61,399 deaths out of a population of 39.6 million, and 
  • Idaho (Relaxed Mask Mandates) – Death rate of 0.0011 –  2,031 deaths out of a population of 1.9 million.
  • Alaska (Relaxed Mask Mandates) – Death rate of 0.0005 – 341 deaths out of a population of 733,391.

It has never been about the masks.  Sure they probably provide some level of protection from spreading the disease, but this is about ascertaining the level of compliance government can squeeze out of their subjects.

Last week I traveled out of state.  While walking through an unnamed airport I heard the obligatory public address announcement that we should all be wearing masks in the airport.  

What caught my attention was the announcement went something like this: “Federal law requires all passengers to wear masks while inside the passenger terminal.  Wearing masks helps prevent the spread of disease. Your compliance with this requirement is appreciated.”   

Get what the announcer said: “…helps prevent the spread of disease.”  That made my skin crawl, as I could see our future. Once government has socialized us into wearing masks for Covid, because they said so, couldn’t they also mandate masks for the seasonal flu; the next global disease like SARS, Eboli, tuberculosis; or maybe just to protect against the common cold?  Of course they will think they can.  

Fact is, as I am writing this piece, the COVID infectious rate is lower than the annual average seasonal flu infectious rate, yet the CDC still pushes us to mask-up.  They have established the bar that, we the people, will comply with useless mandates presented as protecting the health of our nation because the wizards of Washington said so.  

How about mandating protection for the potential spread of HIV/AIDS?  That was over twice as deadly as Covid.  I would never support that type of insane government intrusion into my life any more than I can tolerate the lunatics mandating masks in communities that have no demonstrable outbreak of Covid among the general population, like Anchorage.  Even with Tuesday’s assembly action to repeal the emergency orders, they left the mask mandate in place.

Don’t be sucked into the lie that the mask mandates were to protect the population from Covid-19.  It was never about that at all.  It has always been about government elitists, who know they are smarter and wiser than you and me, taking control of our lives to increase their power over us.  

Our constitutional rights have been flushed down the toilet with this past year of pandemic paranoia and with this new-found power you can bet we will see more “government mandates” in the future to protect us from ourselves.  Our rights under the United States Constitution are but a shadow of what that wonderful document gave us in 1789.  How much more are we willing to concede?

Craig E. Campbell served on the Anchorage Assembly between 1986 and 1995 and later as Alaska’s Tenth Lieutenant Governor.  He was the previous Chief Executive Officer and President for Alaska Aerospace Corporation.  He retired from the Alaska National Guard as Lieutenant General (AKNG) and holds the concurrent retired Federal rank of Major General (USAF).

Look who made cover of Vogue Mexico

Quannah Chasinghorse, an teenage eco-warrior from Fairbanks, Alaska, graces the cover of Vogue Mexico this month. She is the daughter of Native activist Jody Potts, who famously took down former Lt. Gov. Byron Mallott.

Vogue Mexico adds “fashion industry” to the list of qualifications that Chasinghorse has, besides her well-known environmental activism.

In the lavish photo shoot, Chasinghorse is posed in various attire, including the cultural Mexican horsewoman look, complete with gaucho pants and poncho, cultural appropriation that might not be acceptable in other settings or with other models. Just this week, fashionistas critiqued Justin Bieber for being a white man sporting dreadlocks, calling it cultural appropriation.

See the story at this link.

Last year, Chasinghorse was in Teen Vogue.

Dunbar’s dark money: What could go wrong?

By ANCHORAGE DAILY PLANET

When you take a look at the staggering list of Forrest Dunbar’s union support for his mayoral bid, and realize an attack ad aimed at his opponent Dave Bronson is financed almost entirely by an Outside group, you have to wonder:

If Dunbar were to win the mayoral runoff election that ends May 11, who is Dunbar really going to represent?

The group behind the ad, “Building a Stronger Anchorage,” is actually The Sixteen Thirty Fund. It is based in Washington, D.C., and gave Building a Stronger Anchorage nearly its entire $35,000 campaign war chest, Alaska Public Offices Commission records show.

Who or what is The Sixteen Thirty Fund? Hayden Ludwig, writing in Politico, says:

“The Sixteen Thirty Fund is essentially a subsidiary of Arabella Advisors, a Washington, D.C.-based firm and a veritable Geppetto, the fictional woodcarver and puppeteer whose creation, Pinocchio, involves him in all sorts of mischief.

“Besides offering consulting services to wealthy left-leaning clients, Arabella provides a unique service to the professional Left through four major nonprofits.

“Of these four nonprofits, the Arabella-run advocacy group—the Sixteen Thirty Fund—might be called the darkest of ‘dark money’ nonprofits.”

Good grief. With friends like that….

Golly, if unions, The Sixteen Thirty Fund, and anonymous purveyors of dark money are in love with Dunbar, what possibly could go wrong for Anchorage if he were to be elected?

It’s official: Congressman Don Young files for reelection

Congressman Don Young and Anne Young stopped by the Division of Elections in Anchorage on Tuesday and filed for the 2022 election. Young has been Alaska’s member of the U.S. House of Representatives since 1973 and is the longest continuously serving member of the House.

In 2017, Young became Dean of the House, the longest-serving representative and the first Republican dean in more than 80 years. In 2019, Congressman Young made history after becoming the longest-serving Republican in American history to serve in Congress.

In the 117th Congress, Young is Republican leader of the Subcommittee for Indigenous Peoples of the United States, in addition to his roles as the most senior member of both the Transportation and Natural Resources Committees.

“There is no doubt that this has been a difficult time for our state. The pandemic has devastated our tourism economy, the new Administration has forced new resource exploration to grind to a halt, and extremists from the Lower 48 have only grown emboldened in their goal of locking up Alaska,” Young said. “With attacks coming at our state on all fronts, Alaska needs a proven leader to stand up and fight for the people of our great state. This is not the time to take risks on someone untested and unproven. That is why I have officially filed for reelection to serve as Congressman for All Alaska in the 118th Congress.”

He continued, “I always say that this has never been about Don Young. This is about Alaska and the people who call our great state home. My constituents need and deserve representation that listens to them and brings the Alaskan perspective to DC; that has always been my mission as your Congressman. Together, we have secured many wins for Alaska. Whether it is constructing the Trans-Alaska Pipeline, strengthening the fishing industry, obtaining funding for Alaska’s infrastructure, or working together to protect Alaska Native subsistence rights and culture, I have proven how to get big things done.”

Young was elected in a special election following the presumed death of Rep. Nick Begich, whose flight disappeared en route from Anchorage to Juneau. A teacher and riverboat captain, Young served in the U.S. Army, and later as mayor of Fort Yukon. He was elected to the Alaska House of Representatives in 1966 and served from 1967-1971 and in the Alaska Senate from 1971-1973.

In December, Young filed for reelection with the Federal Elections Commission, but candidates for federal office must also file with the State Division of Elections, and by doing so on Tuesday, Young answered the question on the minds of many politicos: Will he run again?

Although he has served for 47 years, this will be the first time he’ll face a jungle primary ballot, which means candidates of all parties and nonparties appear on the same ballot. The general election ballot will also be new in 2022, as it will require voters to rank their preferences from 1 to 4 of the four top vote getters from the primary. The new voting scheme comes from Ballot Measure 2, passed by voters in 2020 after a dark-money campaign by Outside liberal forces targeted Alaska.