Tuesday, April 28, 2026
Home Blog Page 1117

Bob Bird: FBI raid on innocent couple shows lawlessness at Department of Justice

By BOB BIRD

Wednesday’s rogue FBI raid on an innocent couple in Homer is an example of what happens when a lawless and completely illegitimate political party and administration come to power.

The Democrats are utilizing the proven techniques of communism and fascism, and weaponizing federal law enforcement for political purposes. They are now reaping the fruits of the November’s fake election. Its aftermath spells the end of freedom in America. It is no longer a threat. It is here, and none of us are safe.

Paul and Marilyn Hueper went to DC on Jan. 6 to listen to Donald Trump’s speech. Like other Alaskans, they were at the very foot of the stage and in front of a million people in the Washington Mall, but when they were dismissed by Trump to “Peacefully and patriotically protest”, they suddenly found themselves at the back of a very long line. They got lost, they bought a hot dog, they started up the steps, but they never got within a hundred yards of entering the capitol building.

Nevertheless, the FBI had security footage of a woman that they suspect stole Nancy Pelosi’s laptop. Because even minimal social media postings are not private, the FBI got hold of a photo of Marilyn Hueper’s face and clothing that day. Hair-style, a neck warmer and coat colors somewhat matched.

Because they knew the fact that the Huepers were in DC, they bashed in the door of their living quarters at their posh Homer Inn and Spa boutique hotel with guns drawn. They placed them and two other hotel guests in handcuffs, separated them, and began questioning … all without showing their badges or any search warrant. 

When requested to do so, they were told, “In due time.” They were never even read their Miranda rights. And when they finally showed them the warrant fully two and a half hours later, the Huepers did not even have sufficient time to read it or their briefly flashed badges completely.

Any grade-school child would be able to see that the woman in the security image was not Marilyn Hueper, based on simple front-face and profile images which the FBI unquestionably possessed and which Marilyn helpfully pointed out to them. Nevertheless, their home was literally ransacked, the gun safe opened and their cell phones and personal laptops were seized. They have not been returned.

Thoughtfully, the Hueper’s were promised a new door by the FBI.

What conclusions can be drawn by all this?

For starters, our cell phones and computers have become tools by which the government spies on us. Most of us already knew that, but they are not necessarily any longer our helpful friends.

Next, as Marilyn Hueper said, “We never thought we needed to know our rights. That was for other people to know.” In a case where the federal constitution is actually the operative document to consult, the 4th Amendment, already egregiously abused by the TSA, states: “And no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, or the persons or things to be seized.”

All the agents needed to do was allow them to study the warrant. Whether or not it fulfilled all the requirements would be something for lawyers to parse through later. This sort of amateurish and fresh-from-the-academy behavior will someday lead to bloodshed.

Lastly, perhaps the real purpose of the raid was to intimidate citizens to not even protest. Going to the wrong rally in the wrong place at the wrong time might get you an FBI courtesy call.

Alaska’s lawmakers ought to consider discarding the mysteriously concocted system of boroughs and do what 48 other states have done: create counties. In the Anglo-Saxon common law heritage, a county’s top authority is the sheriff, elected by the people and responsible to them alone. No renegade and politically-motivated federal agents can operate without a sheriff’s permission. In many examples, federal agents from the IRS, FBI, BATFE and other agencies have been ordered out by local sheriffs.

There is never any argument. They quickly pack up and go back to their DC Swamp.

Bob Bird is chair of the Alaskan Independence Party and the host of a talk show, the Bird’s Eye View on KSRM radio, Kenai.

Southeast fiber break causes internet outage

4

Early Thursday afternoon, a subsea fiber optic cable was damaged and Alaska Communications voice, data, and internet service to Southeast Alaska was interrupted. The outage prevented internet users from accessing state websites, including access to the Legislature’s akleg.gov suite of information. Much of Juneau is without phone and internet service.

The company has started to rerouted traffic to other fiber optic cables and is performing repairs on the damaged cable. “We expect internet service in Southeast Alaska to be restored before midnight tonight,” ACS reported late Thursday evening. “We have crews mobilized and will work around the clock until service is restored.”

Special Assembly meeting Monday to fix mistakes in CARES Act funding

20

The Anchorage Assembly made mistakes in how it handled the CARES Act money when it played a shell game last year in order to buy a hotel or two for drug addicts.

Now, it has discovered that its mistakes impact property tax payers from Girdwood to Chugiak — drastically.

A special meeting of the Anchorage Assembly has been called for Monday at 6 pm to try to resolve the matter as a critical deadline approaches.

The matter came to light when Girdwood Board of Supervisors Co-Chair Mike Edgington caught the mistake and brought it to the attention of the Administration after the Assembly voted on the rate of tax levy on Tuesday.

At issue is legal usage of CARES Act funds, which former Mayor Ethan Berkowitz and the liberal members of the Assembly wanted to use to pay for a massive homelessness industrial complex in Anchorage, with shelters and wrap-around services next to neighborhoods full of children.

When that CARES Act money was discovered to be improperly used for the hotels, the Municipality moved it over to cover police and fire response, and shifted police and fire money over to pay for the hotels.

That caused an unintended imbalance in the tax levy, pushing a drastically increased tax levy for Girdwood, Chugiak, and other tax districts outside of the APD and/or AFD service areas.

The mill rate notices must be in the mail by May 15, and the municipality’s property appraisal office needs 10 days between finalizing the mill rate and preparing and printing the tax notices. Therefore, the Monday meeting of the Assembly is somewhat of an emergency meeting.

Craig Campbell: A sinister game of Covid politics is afoot in Anchorage election

7

By CRAIG E. CAMPBELL

In what can only be described as a transparent attempt to salvage a crumbling campaign to elect the most liberal mayor in Anchorage‘s history, just two weeks out from the run-off election the Assembly voted to repeal most restrictions in Emergency Order 20 that have had Anchorage locked down for over a year.

On May 11, Anchorage voters will decide if the city is to continue down the road to self-destruction or turn back the west coast advancement of urban ruin.  

The choice could not be more stark. Forrest Dunbar is the most liberal candidate to ever be on the final ballot for mayor. He is opposed by a fresh new face in politics, Dave Bronson, a more conservative candidate who has a clear plan for the economic recovery of Anchorage and establishing budget discipline for the local government.

The Anchorage mayor’s race has been contentious. Dunbar is the sweetheart of the unions and progressive organizations. He is heavily funded by out-of-state organizations that see Anchorage ripe for becoming the new progressive metro area, in the image of such failed cities as Portland and Seattle.  

Bronson, on the other hand, stands for rebuilding the private sector, empowering individuals to make responsible decisions in their lives, confronting the rising violent crime in Anchorage, and making Anchorage a vibrant center of economic activity for the state. Bronson’s message is resonating with a community tired of the year-long lockdown, questionable mask mandates, and constant government intrusion.

Knowing that Anchorage voters are sick and tired of the unnecessary Covid mandates, the liberal Anchorage Assembly unashamedly executed a political bait-and-switch maneuver on Tuesday designed to mislead voters into thinking Forrest Dunbar was opposed to the emergency mandates that he has consistently championed and voted for this past year.  

It was such a childish and transparent trick. The Assembly has had ample opportunity — every other week, in fact — to roll back the draconian mandates, but instead they waited until the last minute, designed to make it a political “win” for Dunbar.  

So here’s how they may intend the game to play out:

On April 27, 2021 the Anchorage Assembly voted to repeal most requirements of EO-20, except for the wearing of masks. Restaurants and bars can go back to full capacity.  Public gathering with food and beverage have no limits.  All restrictions on organized sports and fitness are repealed. Basically, it’s back to normal, but wearing masks.  

After voting to support every emergency order this past year, including the extension vote just a few weeks ago, Dunbar suddenly supported repealing EO-20. The repeal is effective Monday, May 3.  

Everybody celebrates and Dunbar makes a big deal in his campaign that he has voted to repeal the extremely unpopular EO-20.

This is nothing but political theater. Two weeks before the mayoral run-off, when it became clear Dunbar was falling behind Bronson, Dunbar supports repealing EO-20?   

But will that vote actually result in the repeal?  Five members of the Anchorage Assembly voted not to repeal EO-20 and Acting Mayor Austin Quinn-Davidson signed the latest version just two weeks ago, proclaiming that Anchorage was not yet near the herd immunity threshold necessary to remove the restrictions.  

At that time Dunbar publicly agreed with Quinn-Davidson. He wanted 70 percent vaccination rate before things could be normalized.

This charade will play out in one of two ways. Quinn-Davidson has seven days from passage in which she may veto the repeal action.  Her veto would keep EO-20 in place. It would then go back to the Assembly for over-ride consideration. The Assembly has up to 21 days to consider a veto over-ride from the time they receive a mayor’s veto. 

 In that case, the Assembly doesn’t have to take any action until after the mayoral run-off, at which time the Assembly simply will not over-ride the veto, thereby causing EO-20 to remain in effect. That may be exactly what Dunbar is banking on happening. 

If Quinn-Davidson does not veto the resolution by May 3, it goes into effect. But, the Assembly can take action on May 12 to reinstate EO-20 by a simple majority vote.  

Whether Dunbar or Bronson wins, you can bet this scenario is actively being considered by the Assembly. Make no mistake about it, the Anchorage Assembly does not want to relinquish control over our lives which they created with EO-20.

So, voters must not be fooled by the bogus vote to repeal EO-20. That vote was a set-up, orchestrated by progressives to make Dunbar appear to be supporting the repeal of the repressive emergency order that he has always supported. All done in the 11th hour in order to sway uniformed voters.   

When a magician performs a sleight-of-hand trick, we are easily fooled because we are concentrating on the distraction while the real trick is being played out of view.  So it is with the crafty game being played by the Assembly to make it appear Forrest Dunbar supports the re-opening of Anchorage, while never really intending to re-open Anchorage.  

The mystical illusion being puffed by the liberals should never convince anybody Forrest Dunbar is ready to relinquish control over our lives.  It’s all been a sham, which shows just how low progressive politics has been played to mislead voters into supporting Dunbar and installing the most liberal government in the history of this great municipality.  

Craig E. Campbell served on the Anchorage Assembly between 1986 and 1995 and later as Alaska’s Tenth Lieutenant Governor.  He was the previous Chief Executive Officer and President for Alaska Aerospace Corporation.  He retired from the Alaska National Guard as Lieutenant General (AKNG) and holds the concurrent retired Federal rank of Major General (USAF).

Breaking: FBI breaks into Homer, Alaska house, looking for Nancy Pelosi’s laptop

A couple in Homer, Alaska reports the FBI raided their home on Wednesday morning looking for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s laptop.

Twelve agents, FBI, Capitol Police, and other apparent police agents, broke down the door to their home and told Marilyn and Paul Hueper to put their hands up. Paul counted seven guns trained on him when he came out of the bedroom. The agents cuffed the couple and held them for hours.

It was a case of mistaken identity, but the FBI now has possession of Marilyn’s HP Probook laptop. The photo above is on the FBI website as a person of interest in the January 6 surge into the U.S. Capitol, during which Pelosi’s laptop was stolen. The photo above is of the woman the FBI is looking for. Marilyn has no real social media presence or photos online.

“They showed me a different view, where it could have been me,” Marilyn said. The photo they showed was a side shot where the hair and coat were only visible. “They purposely withheld the picture where I could have easily seen it was not me.” Eventually they showed her the photo above — at the end of their search — where the person-of-interest’s face was clearly shown.

“I said oh no, that is not me, I would have never worn that sweater,” she said. “She is wearing this hideous sweater that I would never be caught in. She has detached earlobes, and mine are attached. She has arched eyebrows, and I don’t.”

But Marilyn said the agents told her she had been positively ID’d. Marilyn said that Wendy Terry, special agent in Anchorage, went to Matthew Scobel, the federal magistrate judge in Anchorage, and said was 100 percent positive Marilyn was the woman in the Capitol, Marilyn reported to Must Read Alaska.

“At this point, they said it was a trespassing misdemeanor but if we did not cooperate, they said they would charge me with obstructing justice,” she said.

When Marilyn said, “That’s not me,” she said the agent told her “so you want to go there,” as if she was lying and obstructing justice.

“Paul and I laughed during it. They wouldn’t let us be with each other. He was in the other room. They would not let us go to the bathroom or have a glass of water. The agents did not show the search warrant for two hours,” Marilyn said. Finally, a warrant was flashed at her, but it was quickly taken away.

Marilyn said the FBI now has her laptop, phone and she gave them all codes so they could get into her electronics, because she hopes it will hasten the time it takes to get them back.

Marilyn said, “So I guess that answers one question [about Pelosi’s laptop]. It really did get stolen and is still at large. Not conspiracy theory… if they were telling the truth.”

The couple has been active with Alaskans for Constitutional Rights, a group of civil rights activists across Alaska.

Win Gruening: The $162 million consequences of cruise ship petitions

By WIN GRUENING

Like all communities in Alaska, Juneau is looking forward to emerging from the pandemic stronger and healthier than before.  After a year of hunkering down it’s time to start gearing up to rebuild our relationships, schools, and businesses and get our lives back to normal.  

Why would anyone support actions that would accomplish just the opposite?

I’m referring to the three proposed initiatives amending Juneau’s City Charter to limit cruise ship tourism.  These initiatives would permanently extend the crushing economic consequences wrought by the pandemic that, up to now, have been partially mitigated by temporary federal funding.

  • The first would ban cruise ships with over 250 passengers between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m.
  • The second would ban cruise ships over 250 passengers on Saturdays.
  • The third would ban cruise ships over 100,000 gross tons beginning in 2026. 

The initiative language appears simple but obscures the harmful ramifications for local businesses and residents.  

Initiative backers assert that these “modest” proposals only seek industry “balance and restraint”.  They also contend cruise impacts have been ignored by local leaders. 

Neither of these claims hold water.

Besides, it won’t be the cruise lines that suffer the most should these initiatives pass.  It will be Juneau tourism businesses, restaurants, and retailers and hundreds of their employees who take the hit.  

Here’s why.

Ship arrivals and departures are staggered for navigational safety. Cutting ship hours will delay arrivals and require ships to begin boarding crew and passengers for departure as early as 4:30 pm. Who loses?  Our shore excursion workers, downtown cooks, wait staff, dishwashers, bartenders, and shopkeepers who will have fewer customers to serve. Local longshoremen, cab and shuttle drivers and food truck entrepreneurs will lose wages and fewer Juneau students will be able to find summer jobs.

Restricting Saturday port calls will force some ships to bypass Juneau entirely because minimal dock space is available on other weekdays.

But the large ship ban will have the most serious effect.  While these ships comprise only 1/3 of the fleet, they carry 2/3 of all arriving passengers.  

If these initiatives pass, the industry estimates cruise visitation could plunge by over one million passengers by 2026, to around 350,000, the number we hosted nearly 30 years ago.  Based on historical passenger spending patterns, that translates to an annual loss of $162 million to Juneau businesses.

The CBJ budget will be decimated, and current levels of community services and amenities reduced.  The city receives around 20% of its sales tax revenue from cruise passenger spending, plus $16 million in passenger fees, and another $1 million in various taxes, fees and permits. Add local property taxes from visitor-related businesses and these initiatives will mean smaller city budgets, less support for our hospital, schools, police, and firefighters, and possible city layoffs.

Restaurants and retail outlets now able to stay open year-round because of summer tourism will be forced to close part of the year – some will go bankrupt.

Most Juneau residents and elected officials understand that a healthy economy requires trade-offs which is why city leaders have been responsive to citizen concerns.  Mayor Weldon’s Visitor Industry Task Force recently concluded an exhaustive and inclusive process that solicited public testimony over a period of six months.  The Assembly is now reviewing the VITF draft report and plans to begin implementing recommendations addressing industry impacts. 

Furthermore, the proposed initiatives undermine years of collaboration the city and the industry have engaged in since 1997 with the Tourism Best Management Practices (TBMP) program – seen as a model by other Southeast communities that host visitors.

The eleven initiative sponsors justify short-circuiting the work of the citizen-backed task force by saying voters are entitled to decide three questions that neither the public nor the Assembly had a voice in formulating.  

Opinion pieces published by initiative sponsors already contain misrepresentations and distortions of fact. Undoubtedly, the campaign to collect the 3,000 signatures necessary to get these initiatives on the ballot will continue to devolve into an emotional, fact-free litany of misconceptions and half-truths about the industry.

The current deliberative process is working and should be respected. Why scuttle it with a divisive and expensive community battle?

Much is at stake.  As a Juneau voter, before you sign a petition, please get the facts and consider the consequences.

After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening began writing op-eds for local and statewide media. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations and currently serves on the board of the Alaska Policy Forum.

Sullivan to Biden: Kerry must be investigated over leaks to Iran

10

A letter signed by U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan and 17 other senators asks President Joe Biden to investigate whether John Kerry, Biden’s special climate envoy, leaked classified information to Iran during the Trump Administration.

Kerry serves on Biden’s National Security Council and has a history of transacting with U.S. adversaries to the detriment of our nation, the letter states. In addition to Sullivan, it is signed by Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Mike Braun (R-Ind.), Rick Scott (R-Fla.), Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), and James Lankford (R-Okla.).

The letter, in its entirety:

Dear Mr. President,

We write to convey our grave concerns over U.S. Special Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry’s position as a member of your administration’s National Security Council and his record – both past and present – of potentially working with America’s adversaries against our national security interests and those of our allies. We ask you to investigate recent allegations that Secretary Kerry revealed sensitive information to the Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, and if true, call for his removal from your national security team.

Secretary Kerry has a long history of employing transactional diplomacy against the best interests of the United States or our allies – often trading long-term national security for a flawed short-term political agenda – which has ultimately endangered our allies and emboldened our adversaries. The most recent egregious allegation, is the purported claim in a leaked recording by Foreign Minister Zarif, that Secretary Kerry relayed covert Israeli actions against Iranian interests in Syria. Revealing sensitive information, whether deliberately or not, about one of our most important and enduring allies in the region, the state of Israel, to an avowed enemy – the largest state sponsor of terrorism, responsible for the killing, wounding and maiming of thousands of American service men and women – is reason alone to remove Secretary Kerry from your administration. If proven false, this narrative is yet further proof that Iranian officials are dishonest brokers and we ask that your administration be mindful of this as you continue discussions on the future of U.S. posture towards Iran.

Given the gravity of these allegations, in addition to investigating these claims, we call on you to suspend Secretary Kerry’s access to sensitive information until this investigation is faithfully resolved.

69 percent in Juneau say community is in economic crisis

12

More than two in three Juneauites (69%) believe the community is in an economic crisis. Also, 87 percent said the Assembly should focus on community needs – education, public safety, streets, water, and transportation when spending money.

First Things First Alaska Foundation conducted a survey in partnership with KINY Radio, asking about the Juneau economy and CBJ spending priority. The results are in, and Juneau said stay focused on community needs (87%) without raising taxes.  

“These are stressful economic times, and the CBJ must remain focused on spending for needs and not wants,” said Joe Kahklen, President of First Things First Alaska Foundation. “Many of our neighbors are staring at a non-existent tourism season, and now is not the time to add to Juneau’s cost of living through tax increases,” he said.

Eighty-six percent of those taking the survey said that property taxes should go down or stay the same.  Only twenty-six percent of respondents thought it was okay to spend money on projects such as a new $26 million Centennial/JACC project.

The survey was open to the public from March 15 through April 19, 2021, and accessed through the KINY Radio website. First Things First Alaska Foundation invited Juneau to give us their opinion through a radio spot that ran concurrently. 311 responses were received.  

Two questions on the municipal tax cap

2

By BOB MAIER

L = (T – d – e) x (1 + C + P)

And that, dear mathematicians, is the formula for the annual Anchorage Tax Cap calculation as codified in AMC 12.25.

[Read the tax cap calculation at this Municipal link.]

As the 2021 election for Anchorage Mayor enters the run-off phase two questions need to be asked of each candidate.  First … do you understand this calculation?  And second … in order to provide transparency to the electorate, would you support having the calculation of the Anchorage Tax Cap verified as part of the independently audited Certified Annual Financial Report – (CAFR).

Since the enactment of the Tax Cap in 1984 Anchorage Taxpayers have relied on the Municipal Administration seated at the time to do the calculation correctly.  But has that been the case?

The math itself is not so complex.  The problem is, how were the individual components of the formula determined? 

On December 02, 2003, 156 days after taking office, Mayor Mark Begich and the Anchorage Assembly passed AO-2003-160 … the largest single property tax increase in the history of the Municipality of Anchorage.  2003-160 removed the Municipal Utility Service Assessments and Municipal Enterprise Service Assessments – (MUSA and MESA) – from the tax cap calculation.  In the April 2009 election Proposition 9 …  the “Repair Our Tax Cap” initiative … passed with a 60% majority reversing the provisions implemented in 2003 by re-introducing the MUSA’S and MESA’S back into the Tax Cap calculation.

In 2016 the Administration of Ethan Berkowitz mounted their own assault on the Anchorage Tax Cap.  In the April 2016 election Proposition 8 was passed by a 61% majority which reversed former Mayor Berkowitz’s effort to alter the Tax Cap.  

What we can take from both of these efforts is that some Administrations, when they hold elected office, will seek to alter the historic Anchorage Tax Cap calculation in order to increase tax revenue to city government.  

A third-party audit of the Anchorage Tax Cap calculation as part of the Certified Annual Financial Report is long overdue.

Now if my math is correct … two questions for two candidates equals a total of four answers.

Bob Maier is a Resident of Anchorage who has been paying property taxes to the Municipality every year since 1978.