Friday, August 15, 2025
Home Blog Page 618

Track and field’s global governing body bans transgenders from women’s athletic competitions

The international governing body for track and field sport says that biological males will not be allowed to compete against female athletes in the women’s division. World Athletics announced on Thursday that it will bar any competitor who had already gone through male puberty from the female competition categories.

The organization is breaking with high schools and colleges around the United States that are increasingly allowing boys and men to compete in the girls’ and women’s divisions.

The new ban against biological males in female competitions applies to all running distances and throwing events (javelin, discus), as a way to protect women’s sports. No such bans on women competing in men’s categories seem to be of concern at this time.

World Athletics president Sebastian Coe said, “the World Athletics Council has today taken the decisive action to protect the female category in our sport, and to do so by restricting the participation of transgender and DSD athletes.” DSD stands for differences of sex development, an extremely rare condition. Those DSD athletes will have to show a testosterone level below a certain threshold for a specified period of time.

In regard to transgender athletes, the governing body has agreed to exclude male-to-female transgender athletes who have been through male puberty from female World Rankings competition starting on March 31.

“World Athletics conducted a consultation period with various stakeholders in the first two months of this year, including Member Federations, the Global Athletics Coaches Academy and Athletes’ Commission, the IOC as well as representative transgender and human rights groups,” the statement from the group said.

“It became apparent that there was little support within the sport for the option that was first presented to stakeholders, which required transgender athletes to maintain their testosterone levels below 2.5nmol/L for 24 months to be eligible to compete internationally in the female category,” the organization said.

Last year, the international swimming governing body voted to restrict the participation of transgender athletes in women’s events.

FINA members voted 71.5% in favor of a policy that requires transgender swimmers to have completed their transition by age 12 to be able to compete. The vote was taken after collegiate swimmer Lia Thomas won an NCAA championship in the women’s division.

In Alaska, boys who are identifying as females have been allowed to compete in track and field competitions in the girls’ category. In Haines, a boy in 2016 placed third in the small schools’ girls’ 200-meter sprint, and fifth in the girls’ 100-meter race.

In 2022, a biological male student who identifies as a female enrolled in the girls track and field competition at a local Anchorage middle school.

In Washington State, boys who simply state that they are transgender now can compete against girls. In 2022, a sophomore runner who competed as a male in 2021 won first place in 2022 at a Puget Sound-area school cross country meet in the girls’ division.

Reporter Dori Monson reached out to the school district: “They say they are simply following the rules set forth by the Washington Interscholastic Athletic Association (WIAA) – the governing body for high school athletics and activities in this state. Boys can complete as girls if boys say they are girls. It’s that simple.”

But there has been a significant amount of resistance among high school parents to allowing the trend to continue.

Even former Alaska Rep. Adam Wool, a hardline Democrat and progressive on almost every issue, says admits just science that boys run faster than girls: “My daughter is the fastest runner on her girls high school XC track team. If she were on the boys team she’d be in the middle of the pack. Boys run faster than girls, that’s a scientific fact,” the progressive Fairbanksan wrote on Twitter.

He also pointed out, “The sprinter Allyson Felix won the most world championship medals in history. Her lifetime best in the 400 meters was 49.26 seconds; in 2018, 275 high school boys ran faster.”

Senate Bill 140, the Even Playing Field Act, was sponsored by Sen. Shelley Hughes and co-sponsored by Sen. Mike Shower and Lora Reinbold, to protect the girls’ division from the boys’ unfair advantage. The bill died in committee in the Alaska Senate in the Education Committee, chaired by now-former Sen. Roger Holland.

The Alaska State Board of Education this year passed a resolution to protect girls in sports but the resolution does not have the force of law. It simply asks school districts to pass rules prohibiting the discrimination of girls in sports.

Peltola votes against parents in ‘Parents Bill of Rights’

House Republicans on Friday passed House Resolution 5, the “Parents Bill of Rights,” on a vote of 213-208.

Alaska Rep. Mary Peltola voted against the measure at every opportunity, along with the rest of House Democrats. She stated on the record that children need privacy from their parents and that schools should keep information from parents so that children are “safe at school.”

The bill was written “to ensure the rights of parents are honored and protected in the Nation’s public schools,” according to House Resolution 5. It arose after numerous reports from every state of the union about gender ideology being taught and soft porn being made available to young children in school.

The bill requires schools to publish what the curriculum is, so that parents can see if topics such as critical race theory (racial bias is inherent in western society because the society was primarily designed for and implemented by white people), critical gender theory (people are not born with gender but learn it and transsexuals should undergo hormonal treatment and sex reassignment surgery in order to make his/her body conform with his/her perceived gender identity), or other controversial topics are being taught.

The bill also requires schools to get permission from parents before referring to their children by an alternative, secret gender pronoun, such as he/him, ze/zir, xe/xer, she/her, they/them, sie/hir, or any of the other pronouns that that gender ideologues are promoting to younger and younger children. Schools would not be allowed to re-gender a child or refer to a child by a different name than the one given to the child by the parent.

The bill also says that children must use the locker room or bathroom of the gender with which they were conceived and born. In other words, schools that receive federal funding would not be able to allow boys who are identifying as girls to use these facilities.

Schools would also be required to give parents the reading lists that are being given to the students and be transparent about what books are being offered in classrooms and school libraries. The legislation, which now goes to the Senate, would boost parents’ right to speak out at school board meetings.

In recent months, the Anchorage School Board has prevented a parent from reading material into the record that is from books that are available to elementary school through high school students. When parent Jay MacDonald tried to read from the children’s training-porn book “Let’s Talk About It,” he was shut down by the school board, even though it is a title that was, at one point, available to children.

According to the bill, “Parents have a First Amendment right to express their opinions on decisions made by State and local education leaders.” This is already inherent in the U.S. Constitution, but the bill sponsors felt it was important to specify, since so many parents re being prevented from protesting actions of their school leaders.

In Anchorage and other communities, some students are re-identifying as an alternative gender at school and are being referred to by secret names that parents are not told. This practice would be illegal under the bill.

Democrats have raged over the bill, which will need to pass the Senate and be signed into law by the president, an unlikely occurrence.

“Our children need urgent and aggressive educational solutions,” said U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, in a floor speech. “When we talk about progressive values, I can say what my progressive value is, and that is freedom over fascism.”

Hundreds at town hall say no to Felix Rivera’s homeless shelter at Arctic Recreation Center

Over 350 Anchorage residents came out to take a stand against Assemblyman Felix Rivera’s proposed homeless shelter in a midtown Anchorage neighborhood. Only one person spoke in favor of it.

The public spent their Friday night at the Arctic Recreation Center, attending a town hall meeting called by Mayor Dave Bronson, and said that their neighborhoods and children living there were not ready to take on the assault of a homeless industrial complex envisioned by Rivera.

Rivera has called the pushback against his homeless plan “reactionary.”

Rivera, who is running for reelection for the Anchorage Assembly’s midtown seat, is the chair of the Assembly’s homelessness committee and has advanced the idea of buying the Arctic Recreation Center from a church. The gymnasium is south of Tudor Road and West of C Street.

Rivera’s idea has been to permanently shelter up to 200 people there, while also purchasing nine adjacent acres and building low-income housing. The shelter itself would be “low barrier,” which means it would have the least amount of standards of any shelter in town, to take the most aggressively difficult vagrants who won’t adhere to shelter rules elsewhere.

Currently those individuals have shelter at the Sullivan Arena, where they sleep on cots in an area that once was a venue for sports and concerts.

The initial cost of purchasing the Arctic Recreation Center would hit taxpayers with a $13 million bill, but that would just be the beginning of the costs. Anchorage is spending tens of millions on homelessness issues each year.

Both Rivera, who delivers for Door Dash to augment his salary on the Assembly, and Assemblywoman Meg Zaletel, who has a lavishly paid day job of running the Anchorage Coalition to End Homelessness, attended the town hall.

Rivera and Zaletel have been leading the opposition to the mayor’s solution, which had included a “navigation center” at Elmore and Tudor Roads, where people could start their journey back to sobriety, work, and stable housing.

Rivera and Zaletel blocked the mayor’s navigation center effort, even after approving it initially. Now, they and their comrades on the Assembly will not authorize the pay for the site work done for the navigation center, stiffing the contractor who did the dirt work, while attempting to spend $13 million to buy a building near a residential neighborhood that apparently opposes their efforts.

Felix Rivera, promoter of the Arctic Rec. Center, sits and listens to the public who is opposed to it.

Rivera, who started his political life working for former Mayor Ethan Berkowitz, has said he wants to relaunch the homeless plans with a clean slate. He has begun to realize the extent of the opposition to his plans for the Arctic Recreation Center, as he has seen the pushback at the same time he is up for reelection. Travis Szanto has challenged him for the midtown seat.

Already, the radical Assembly has purchased the Golden Lion hotel at 36th Avenue and Seward Highway for $9 million for a drug rehab homeless center, but it sits vacant because the neighborhood, a nearby Jewish preschool, and Mayor Dave Bronson don’t think it is a good site to treat drug addicts.

Last week, Rivera called the pushback against the Arctic Recreation Center a “reactionary response.”

“This division and reactionary response are impeding my laser-focused work to stand up a shelter by November, before winter arrives,” Rivera said in a statement.

Rivera and the Assembly majority, which opposes nearly everything proposed by the mayor, blocked the mayor’s efforts to get a navigation center stood up before winter hit. That disagreement is still ongoing, as the Assembly is now refusing to pay the contractor who did the site preparation work for the navigation center.

Rivera says now he wants to start over. He will present a new “clean slate” proposal to the Assembly for consideration at a work session on March 31, 2023. The meeting is titled, “Discussion on Permanent Year-Round Low-Barrier Shelter” and will be held from 11 am to 12:30 pm at the Assembly Chambers in the Loussac Library, at 36th Avenue and Denali Street.

Senate legislation also targets Willow for taxes

Before ConocoPhillips has even had a chance to get out from under the latest environmental lawsuit over the Willow Project, the Alaska Senate has a plan to tax it at a new level.

SB 114 changes oil production tax calculations, reduces the per-barrel tax credit, closes a loophole that now benefits Hilcorp, and ring fences the Willow Project, limiting the developer’s ability to deduct its capital expenditures against its production tax from other fields.

That’s a big deal, according to those in the business. In addition, there may be other “Easter eggs” in the bill, which also is going to be a big shift for Hilcorp.

It was drafted by oil company foe Sen. Bill Wielechowski, and it has no fiscal note. It was also not sent to Senate Resources, which would have put Sen. Cathy Giessel in an untenable position for her next reelection campaign. Giessel, in the past, has not favored unreasonable oil taxes.

The bill may also be more about pushing the House to not go for a full Permanent Fund dividend. There is also a possibility that Wielechowski did not draft the bill in the manner his colleagues had requested.

ConocoPhillips has not made its investment decision yet on Willow. It first has to get through what it hopes will be the final environmental lawsuit.

Taylor, Yundt: Anchorage bond rating was downgraded in November, but more bonds are on the ballot

By JODI TAYLOR AND ROB YUNDT

Recently, regional banks in the United States and one major international bank have either collapsed or, in crisis, been rescued by larger banks, due to liquidity issues. 

Given these financial headwinds, it is a great time to assess the financial viability of the Municipality of Anchorage as voters decide how to vote on the many bonding propositions on the ballot.

In November 2022, Anchorage had its bond rating (credit score) downgraded by Fitch, citing the Municipality’s depleted cash reserve levels, which were not adequate to cover 10% of the Muni’s current year expenditures in its general fund.

That means the Muni was required to have about one month’s annual expenses in cash in order to maintain its rating. It did not.

Later, Fitch updated its rating notes after finding the Muni could borrow up to $640 million in cash. Basically it found that the Muni’s liquidity issues were solved because the Muni had a “credit card” with a $640 million limit. 

This is not the place of financial strength one would hope for and not how we the voters run our personal finances.  Financial advisors suggest families have three to six months of cash on hand, yet the Municipality of Anchorage has less than a month.  

Contrast that with the MatSu Borough. In 2022, Fitch maintained the Borough’s bond rating, although the Borough was not seeking to borrow any money, and cited the strong cash reserve position for the rating. The MatSu Borough has roughly two month’s annual operating expenses and one year of its annual debt service on hand.  

The Muni and the MatSu Borough also differ what type of capital projects they take on and how they pay for them. For example, the Muni is seeking in this current election cycle to bond to repair roofs, replace worn out equipment, or rehabilitate a trail, essentially bonding for maintenance, a dubious financial position to be in. 

Contrast this with MatSu Borough paying $25 million for a new school this year — with cash. Two years ago, MatSu voters approved a roads package — adding roads, not repairing them — again the Borough paid cash. MatSu has increased its school enrollment by 64% in the last 10 years, yet is paying for schools with cash, rather than borrowing. 

In addition, the cost of borrowing has increased.  The average loan in 2020 was 3.7%, versus the current 7%. The Fed just bumped rates a quarter point this week. Any new bonds (debt) added to the Muni would cost about 1.5 times what that same liability would have cost per month in 2020. Similarly, short-term lending to cover monthly expenses, or the $640 million in borrowable cash, also will increase the Muni’s monthly expenses.

Given the problem the Muni has with low cash reserves and the substantially increased costs of bonding, it’s not the time to add more debt.  Let’s learn lessons from the bank failures and the MatSu’s example of being financially prudent in regards to taking on additional debt.  It’s not the right time to add more debt to the Muni monthly expenses, rather, we should wait until the Muni replenishes its cash reserves before taking on any more debt in the short term.  

Rob Yundt, MatSu Borough Assemblyman, and Jodi Taylor, Anchorage resident, are each life-long Alaskans, business owners, and (by happy coincidence) they both have six kids.

Jim Crawford: Dedicated funds, Alaska style

By JIM CRAWFORD

The Alaska constitution states “§ 7. Dedicated Funds. The proceeds of any state tax or license shall not be dedicated to any special purpose, except as provided in section 15 of this article or when required by the federal government for state participation in federal programs. This provision shall not prohibit the continuance of any dedication for special purposes existing upon the date of ratification of this section by the people of Alaska. [Amended 1976]”

Translating that: The Alaska Constitution forbids dedicated funds except if that dedication was in existence prior to statehood or is passed by the majority of the voters. This reference does not allow the judiciary to grant judgment in opposition to the Alaska Constitution. 

The Constitution is being ignored. The agencies have taken the lead in establishing unconstitutional dedicated funds.

Here’s a partial list of Agencies and funds that hold on to money in excess of appropriations and therefore create their own Dedicated Fund:  

  • Unrestricted and restricted net worth $1,310 Billion Alaska Industrial and Development Authority, AIDEA
  • Unrestricted and restricted net worth $1,374 Billion Alaska Energy Administration, AEA
  • Unrestricted General and minor funds (GeFonsi) $3,950 billion
  • Unrestricted and restricted net worth Constitutional Budget Reserve $1.07 Billion
  • Unrestricted and unrestricted net worth $1,575 billion, Alaska Housing Finance Corp, AHFC
  • Unrestricted balance of Earnings Reserve Account  of the Alaska Permanent Fund $3.8 Billion

TOTAL: $12,097 BILLION

Some of the funds, notably AEA, cover long held and politically powerful sponsors. Think of the Power Cost Equalization Fund. Amazingly, the Alaska Supreme Court declared it a dedicated fund without the constitutional requirements. When our own Alaska Supreme Court violates the law in a finding for their version of the common good, rather than finding for the express will of the people, our constitution no longer serves as the protector of the people’s will.  

If you want further proof of the problem, just look at the Alaska Legislature’s money grab called the “Percentage of Market Value.” It’s quite simply a raid on the Alaska Permanent Fund. It’s not a partisan issue with Democrats and Independents versus Republicans fighting each other. Instead, it is the issue of the next decade since it dictates spending of the principle of the Alaska Permanent Fund when earnings are insufficient to handle the appropriation. If you are feeling constitutionally insecure, you have that right.  

Keep in mind that the Legislature has $12 billion in the bank, enough to solve each and every Alaska problem. Even with the $12 billion, some members of the Senate and the House are proposing an income tax as part of their fiscal plan for Alaska. Their idea of a fiscal plan is to swipe your Permanent Fund Dividend and impose an income tax. Raising taxes on Alaskans or stealing our Permanent Fund dividend should not be the foundation of anyone’s fiscal plan. Permanent Fund earnings do not justify increases in operation expenses nor additional public funding for education, land management and Medicaid and other budgetary purposes.

No new taxes should be passed while the unconstitutional funds exist.  The solution is simple, as Gov. Mike Dunleavy has demonstrated.  Sweep excess money from agencies into the General Fund and then observe the constitution on dedicated funds. 

In 2023, Legislators have a choice: Bring to the people at the next election a ballot proposition that establishes dedicated funds for housing, economic development, Permanent Fund earnings or stop treating them as dedicated funds. If those unconstitutional funds go down at the public vote, enforce sweeping of the funds and appropriating them as the needs arise. Do not, however, spread the obvious untruth that we’re broke. We’re not. Do not impose new taxes on Alaskans when we have $12 billion in the bank.     

Jim Crawford is the former President of Permanent Fund Defenders, pfdak.com, an Alaska based educational nonprofit corporation. Jim is a third generation, lifelong Alaskan who co-chaired the Alaskans Just Say No campaign to stop the raid on the Permanent Fund in 1999.  He also served Gov. Jay Hammond as a member of the Investment Advisory which formed the investment and corporate strategy of the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation in 1975.   

Power the future: Alaska’s next energy battlefield is renewable portfolio standards

By RICK WHITBECK | POWER THE FUTURE

With the Biden Administration now having gone nearly two weeks without an administrative or executive order hurting one of Alaska’s resource development opportunities, it gives everyone a chance to take a deep breath and re-focus.

For renewable energy zealots – you know, the misguided souls who believe ‘green’ energy solutions can be made cost-effectively, and somehow, will work all the time instead of intermittently – 2023 is the year to throw down their gauntlet, make demands and force their desired outcomes on the state.

They’ve found willing legislators in the Alaska House and Senate to be their patsies and introduce “renewable portfolio standard” (RPS) bills this session. Renewable portfolio standards would mandate a certain percentage of a utility’s power come from ‘green’ energy sources by a certain date.  With this legislation, it is 80% power by 2040.

Organizations like REAP (Renewable Energy Alaska Project) and the Alaska Center (for the Environment and every other liberal cause-de-jour) have touted renewable portfolio standards as “must-pass” legislation this session. Those groups, along with the legislation’s supporters, have refused to acknowledge the three biggest problems with RPS:

  • Nothing about renewable portfolio standards is free-market. Mandating a certain outcome by a certain date drives an artificial market adjustment; overriding consumer choice and the ability of the  market to choose winners and losers.
  • Nothing about renewable portfolio standards is ready to be implemented today. Wind, solar and other “green” solutions aren’t ready to scale, there isn’t a storage solution for their energy that is practical, and the utilities themselves would need transmission upgrades that would bankrupt their co-op budgets (hence, the need for subsidies and state aid, which goes back to artificial market adjustments in the previous point).
  • Nothing about renewable portfolio standards makes sense, unless you’re concerned with a made-up “climate crisis” and willing to take drastic steps to support the narrative. With well over 200 trillion cubic feet of natural gas available on Alaska’s North Slope, the better use of state and utility funds would be to work with the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation and build the pipeline that would feed not only the population centers of the state, but an terminal for LNG exports.  

Ultimately, the 60 members of the Legislature will decide the fate of renewable portfolio standards. Let’s hope – for Alaska’s sake – they listen to reason and not REAP and friends.

Rick Whitbeck is state director for Power the Future.

Call it a ‘Hilcorp tax’: Senate bill revises oil taxes

A 40+ page bill filed in the Alaska Senate is designed to close a loophole that Hilcorp has been able to take advantage of due to its corporate structure was filed today by Senate Rules.

SB 0114 is an act “establishing an income tax on certain entities producing or transporting oil or gas in the state; relating to the oil and gas production tax,” and has been referred only to the Senate Finance Committee, which means it is on the fast track.

The Alaska State budget is suffering from a shortfall in revenues due to the price of Alaska crude oil being lower than was anticipated by last year’s forecast.

The bill says that any entity that has a qualified taxable income of over $4 million in a tax year shall pay a tax of 9.4% of the qualified taxable income over that $4 million amount. There area number of other provisions in the lengthy bill, but it’s clear from the bill that it is targeting Hilcorp, which is an LLC corporation and thus is not covered by some of Alaska’s oil tax structure.

Hilcorp took over the running of Alaska’s major oil fields as BP Alaska exited the state. This story will be updated.

Alex Gimarc: Putting Alaskans First wants to keep the clown car running the Assembly

By ALEX GIMARC

What does it say about the state of Big Labor in Anchorage when one of the most well-funded political committees, Putting Alaskans First, is running attack ads in a local Assembly race? Worse, the committee is relying on Outside money for most of its campaign donations.  

The race in question is for West Anchorage, an attempt to replace Austin Quinn-Davidson with someone more rational, in this case Brian Flynn running against Anna Brawley.  Perennial candidate Dustin Darden also on the ballot. Quinn-Davidson decided not to run again.

Over the last couple weeks, the Putting Alaskans First Committee singled out Flynn in an attack ad running on local radio stations. The ad takes Flynn to task for not being sufficiently virulent in his opposition to Mayor Bronson, specifically going after Bronson for issuing sole source contracts.  That charge is laughable, as unions have demanded for decades things called project labor agreements, which bind contractors to union-supplied labor.  Apparently, Bronson is not giving the AFL/CIO exclusive contracts like the previous Democrat administrations (Quinn-Davidson and Berkowitz) did. And the union leadership doesn’t like that a lot.

This was the only substantive criticism of Flynn, and it is entirely mind reading, based on what they believe he will do if elected.  

A closer look at Putting Alaskans First is instructive, starting with its location at 3333 Denali here in Anchorage.  That is the same address as the AFL/CIO and IBEW are located.  We saw with our discussion of Scott Kendall’s proximity to Lisa Murkowski’s Anchorage Office that location is just as important in the political wars as it is in real estate.

APOC carries both Kim Hayes and Joelle Hall on their documents.  Both women are listed with AFL/CIO e-mail addresses.  Note that Hall is listed as the contact for the Putting Alaskans First Committee while Hays is listed as the contact for the PAC.

The committee looks to be the centerpiece of AFL/CIO political spending here in Alaska over the last couple years, reporting nearly 40 contributions with $646,500 in 2022 alone. They reported three checks for $40,000 for 2023. Note that reporting to APOC is always behind what the actual money flow is doing.  

The radio ad ends with the following disclaimer:

Paid for by the Putting Alaskans First Committee, 3333 Denali St. Ste. 125 Anchorage, AK 99503. I, Kim Hays, Chair approved this message. Top three contributors are UNITE AMERICA PAC of Denver, CO, LIUNA Political Fund of Washington, DC and NEA-Alaska PACE of Juneau, AK. This NOTICE TO VOTERS is required by Alaska law. I certify that this advertisement is not authorized, paid for, or approved by the candidate. A majority of contributions to Putting Alaskans First Committee came from outside the State of Alaska.

I highlighted the most important part of the disclaimer, their claim that the majority of funding for this campaign are from out of state. Why is Denver and Washington DC getting themselves involved in our local Assembly race?

Why, indeed? Two possibilities occur to me. The first is that Putting Alaskans First has money left over from the 2022 campaign season, and like a hammer looking for a nail to drive, protecting the Insane Clown Posse they helped install as the majority in the Anchorage Assembly is important, as they want to keep the good times rolling along. A second reason would be that the Insane Clown Posse routine played by the current majority no longer inspires the union membership to donate to elect people who consistently war against them, their jobs, property, schools and checkbooks, while funding the local Homeless Industrial Complex. If the second is true, even in part, we have a significant disconnect between union membership and its leadership.   

Make no mistake, it was the unions that converted the Anchorage Assembly into the clown car we have all come to know and love.  Like all good ringmasters, the leadership wants to keep the show going.  Union leadership is very good at telling us what they don’t like, what scares them. 

Apparently, Brian Flynn does, which is all we need to know to support him.  

Alex Gimarc lives in Anchorage since retiring from the military in 1997. His interests include science and technology, environment, energy, economics, military affairs, fishing and disabilities policies. His weekly column “Interesting Items” is a summary of news stories with substantive Alaska-themed topics. He was a small business owner and Information Technology professional.