Wednesday, August 19, 2026
Home Blog Page 611

The Duck Stamp, that old-fashioned collector’s item, is being modernized for the sake of hunters

5

Duck Stamps are carried in pockets by hunters during duck hunting season, but they are also preserved under glass by collectors who value them for their uniqueness and artistry.

In a rare show of unanimous support, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Duck Stamp Modernization Act (H.R. 2872) by a voice vote Wednesday. The bill preserves the collectible Duck Stamps but also adapts to the needs of hunters who prefer to carry an electronic Duck Stamp.

The Duck Stamp Modernization Act will ensure that an electronic Federal Duck Stamp remains valid throughout the entire hunting season. Presently, when hunters purchase an e-stamp, it remains valid for just 45 days, allowing time for the physical stamp to be delivered by mail. On receiving the stamp, the hunter is required to sign it and have it on his or her person while hunting.

The new legislation allows for a smoother hunting experience by letting hunters show their e-stamp via their smartphones without needing the signed physical stamp in their possession. The physical stamps will still be mailed to e-stamp purchasers once the country’s latest waterfowl season concludes. The option to buy the physical stamp from the U.S. Postal Service or other outlets remains unchanged.

The initiative was supported and pushed forward by Congressional Sportsmen’s Caucus Vice-Chair Rep. Garret Graves of Louisiana and caucus member Democrat Rep. Mike Thompson of California. Texas Republican Rep. Monica De La Cruz, Monica, and California Republican Rep. John Duarte signed on as cosponsors. The Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation played a pivotal role in collaborating with bill sponsors to get the legislation on the House floor.

Jeff Crane, President and CEO of the Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundation, expressed gratitude toward Reps. Graves and Thompson, emphasizing the importance of adapting to digital advancements. “We must find ways to improve easier accessibility and opportunity for our sportsmen’s community,” Crane said.

The Federal Duck Stamp, initiated in 1934, has been instrumental in wetlands conservation. It has garnered over $1.1 billion, resulting in the conservation of over six million acres within the National Wildlife Refuge System.

The popularity of the stamp has surged over the years, from 635,000 in 1934 to over 1.5 million today, translating to $37.5 million for wetlands conservation. Some 98% of the stamp’s purchase price directly fuels the management and enhancement of wetlands. Subsistence hunters are exempt from the purchase requirement.

Alaska also has a state Duck Stamp that is sold separately by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game.

The Senate had unanimously passed its companion bill in July, sponsored by Sens. John Boozman, Joe Manchin, Angus King, and Roger Marshall. A reconciliation of the House and Senate bills must occur before it goes to the president for a signature.

Assembly to create citizen panel that will name places in Anchorage

55

The Anchorage Assembly majority has decided it’s time to pick some better names for places in Anchorage. In today’s politically correct parlance, that typically means assigning indigenous names from languages that are essentially dead.

“The map of Anchorage is characterized by the place names we’ve chosen over the years. Streets, parks, rivers, lakes and buildings are named in reflection of our community’s values,” the Assembly said, indicating in its press release that the Assembly members are unhappy that places are named after individuals and not indigenous place names.

Thus, a naming commission is being created by ordinance to select new names for public places. Perhaps Cuddy Park could get a dual name from a Dena’ina word that describes it.

The renaming of Anchorage has been part of the Anchorage Park Foundation’s mission for several years with its Indigenous Place Names Project.

The park foundation has placed sculptures in various places in Anchorage with indigenous names. Two are along Chester Creek, denoting the name Chanshtnu, the Dena’ina place name meaning Grassy Creek.  Hkaditali, meaning driftwood, is the name for Potter Marsh, referring to the driftwood that was accumulated along the tidal flats. Nuch’ishtunt means a place protected from the wind, and is how the park foundation sees Point Woronzof.

The ordinance seating the naming commission want the members to “select names for public places that impart a sense of historical, cultural or geographical significance considering location, function, Indigenous place names or natural features.” 

The naming commission will consist of nine voting members, including: 

  • A member with a background in history, anthropology, or archaeology
  • An Alaska Native culture advisor with knowledge of local Indigenous history and culture
  • A person recommended by the Native Village of Eklutna
  • A member with expertise in historic preservation
  • A member with experience in diversity, equity and inclusion work
  • Four community-at-large members from different neighborhoods

“While an amendment was made to clarify that the process does not apply to any pending naming proposals, the commission will be charged with future proposals,” the Assembly notes. Those interested in serving on the naming commission can reach out to the Assembly at [email protected] to get instructions on how to apply. 

Do you have suggestions for names of places in Anchorage? Drop them in the comment section below:

Downing: Sullivan fought uphill battle, and won on behalf of sickened Marines at Camp LeJeune

By SUZANNE DOWNING

Democrats and their unscrupulous trial lawyer donors are going to have to find some other sick and injured Americans’ bones to pick clean, now that Sen. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, made sure they can’t use veteran Marines from Camp LeJeune.

Sullivan and other Republican colleagues, such as California Rep. Darrell Issa, fought hard to put a cap on the extortionist fees of trial lawyers taking advantage of Camp LeJeune veterans. 

However, there was no getting through the Democrat Senate with Sullivan’s legislation. Instead, Sullivan persuaded the Justice Department to do what Sen. Jon Tester, the Montana Democrat who chairs the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, refused to do – be fair to sick veterans.

The numbers are staggering: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs believes up to 900,000 retired Marines and their families could be eligible for compensation due to illnesses and injuries resulting from contaminated drinking water at Camp LeJeune in North Carolina over decades. At least 250,000 are expected to file claims.

The total compensation could amount to $6.7 billion, according to the Congressional Budget Office. These veterans and their families have a two-year window to file their claims with the U.S. Navy, and we are halfway through that window.

Whenever significant injury settlements arise, trial lawyers are ready to step in. Billions of dollars in compensation means hundreds of millions in lawyer fees, especially since some of these cases will go to trial, while others are easy money, requiring only paperwork.

Indeed, a simple internet search for “Camp LeJeune” yields dozens of advertisements from legal groups eager for a piece of the settlement pie. Every one of these legal firms has an internet portal for veterans to enter their information and apply for compensation for the long list of illnesses associated with the toxic drinking water at Camp LeJeune. 

With the passing of the PACT Act in 2022, the validity of these settlements is nearly undeniable. If you can prove you were there, and you have a listed illness, the burden of proof has been substantially lowered by the PACT Act.

For example, those who have come down with what is called a “Tier 1” disease, like kidney, bladder, or liver cancer, leukemia, or other cancers, there is a $150,000 settlement if they spent less than one year at Camp LeJeune, or $300,000 if they were at the base for one to five years, and $450,000 for longer.

All the prior bills that were like the PACT Act had caps on trial lawyer fees, but when President Joe Biden signed off on the PACT Act in 2022, Democrats had purposefully stripped the legal fee caps.

Even with the removal of the fee caps specific to Camp LeJeune victims, the bill passed with a resounding majority, due to the many other provisions in the bill that made it nearly impossible for Republicans to vote against. 

Sen. Sullivan, a Marine Reservist and an attorney, bristled at this crafty maneuver by Democrats and the trial lawyers who feed them. 

With the Marine motto of “improvise, adapt, overcome,” Sullivan advocated for the reinstatement of the caps. Precedents, such as the 10% fee cap for lawyers representing 9/11 victims under the Zadroga Act’s Victim Compensation Fund, bolstered his argument. Why then, he questioned, did Democrats permit these lawyers to extract obscene amounts from the ailing Marines?  Alaskans were telling Sullivan’s staff that the fees they were being quoted by lawyers were as high as 75%.

Sullivan pushed to get his Protect Camp Lejeune Victims Ensnared by Trial-lawyers’ Scams (VETS) Act through unanimous consent on the floor, but it was blocked by Democrat Sen. Dick Durbin of Illinois.

Sullivan then tried to get it through the Veterans Affairs Committee by asking that the VETS bill be inserted into another bill, but Democrat Committee Chair Jon Tester of Montana refused, saying “It’s my bill or the highway.”

The Democrats went hard against U.S. Marines but they were coming up against Semper Fidelis Sullivan.

“In my eight years in the U.S. Senate, there are few issues I’ve been involved with that more desperately cry out for a just resolution. My Democratic colleagues fought hard to keep attorney’s fees caps out of the Camp Lejeune Justice Act, with the predictable result of unscrupulous trial lawyers trying to grab sixty to seventy percent of the compensation owed to sick Marines and their families, and spending hundreds of millions of dollars to lure Marines into these ultra-high contingency fee arrangements,” Sullivan said.

The workaround was to go directly to the Department of Justice and Attorney General Merrick Garland, who quickly conceded that the situation was unfair and who instituted legal fee caps through the existing Tort Claims Act, which is considered the standard for other lawsuits against the federal government. Since the Senate was opaque in the PACT Act and didn’t specifically prohibit the Tort Claims Act, Garland was able to use it and he set the cap at 20% for filing paperwork and 25% for going to trial.

“While this is excellent news for the thousands of Americans who suffered after serving at Camp Lejeune, I am still concerned that the new caps are too high, given the fact that Congress reduced the burden of proof for these cases, making them significantly easier to win. I’ll continue working with my colleagues to advance my Protect Camp Lejeune VETS Act to set these caps at a just and reasonable level and maximize the compensation for the individuals who actually deserve it,” Sullivan said.

Those we send to Washington, D.C. to represent us usually have to settle for less than they fight for. It’s a negotiation. It took a leatherneck like Sen. Dan Sullivan to fight on and make it right for the men and women who run into the firefight on behalf of the country.

Suzanne Downing is publisher of Must Read Alaska.

David Ignell: Juneau city officials usher in new era of voter misinformation

By DAVID IGNELL

I want to thank the League of Women Voters for co-sponsoring last week’s election forum with KTOO, KINY and the Juneau Empire. Their mission to educate voters and ensure fair elections is to be applauded and promoted, especially when our democracy is hanging by a thread.

It was an honor to be asked to debate City Manager Rorie Watt at the forum and to represent the “No” vote side on Proposition One, regarding the proposed new city hall.

I care deeply about Juneau and its future. My family has been part of this community for over 70 years and helped establish the Glory Hall and Haven House.

The day after our debate, Juneau voters began to receive a voter information booklet mailed by city officials to “educate” us. Many of us were disturbed to read the biased, one-sided propaganda in favor of Proposition One that dominates the official guide. Key “facts” are grossly misleading. No opposing viewpoint is offered.

The booklet states with certainty the construction cost of the new city hall is $43.3 million. It‘s silent about a city staff memo dated May 3 acknowledging bids on other projects were 1.5 to 1.8 times the estimated cost.

City officials have known for months construction costs of the proposed city hall could easily be $65 to $80 million, yet their official guide avoids any mention of that probability.

During our debate, Rorie Watt acknowledged this “big inflation” is real. He admitted they might need to “value engineer” the project and a downsized structure was possible. He claimed not to be selling “blue sky,” yet by omitting critical material disclosures in the official guide he’s done exactly that.

Not surprisingly, the booklet’s FAQs are silent about the $2 million estimated annual debt service for a $27 million bond. If the construction cost balloons to $70 million, that annual expense will double to $4 million.

Architectural drawing of the latest proposed Juneau City Hall.

The booklet asserts the city pays $820,000 in rent, which is highly misleading. Back on June 2, Watt admitted to me the $820,000 includes utilities, janitorial services, maintenance, etc. These items are operating expenses the City and Borough of Juneau would still have to pay if they owned the buildings they occupy.

Those operating expenses are estimated to total $550,000, meaning the true rental cost is only $270,000, a third of what City officials claim.

Truth and transparency by our local government have sunk to new lows. Prop One is fiscally absurd, considering these numbers. City officials want to spend $4 million in construction and financing costs each year to save us just $270,000 in rent.

The ballot proposition for the proposed new city hall was first rejected by voters a year ago without any organized opposition. The City retaliated by significantly increasing our property taxes and earmarking $10 million toward their coveted luxury office building.

When Watt recommended the issue re-appear on the ballot, public testimony was nearly unanimously opposed. Yet the Assembly rejected us and then gave Watt $50,000 to drown out our voices before the election.

Last year the Assembly voted against using public funds to solicit votes for the new city hall on ethical grounds. This year, however, they crossed the Rubicon. What’s next? Using city funds to solicit votes for political candidates they think are in the best public interest?

Perhaps Wyoming lawyer Gerry Spence said it best: “Although we give lip service to the notion of freedom, we know the government is no longer the servant of the people but, at last, has become the people’s master.”

A variety of state laws are likely being broken by City officials acting as our master, but who will stop them after the fact? Even if State officials get involved, how will these actions be unwound?

Our best bet to stop this government tyranny is to first vote NO on Proposition One and choose Assembly candidates who have taken a sensible stand against it.

Afterward, have a special grand jury investigate this entire affair and report their findings and recommendations to the public. They can best determine whether our City officials are under the influence of any special interests.

Under our Constitution, the public is entitled to know the truth through a panel of 15 randomly selected Juneau citizens with subpoena power.

By next year’s election, we’ll be more informed. Like the League of Women Voters, that is also the fundamental objective of an investigative grand jury.

David Ignell was born and raised in Juneau. He is a forensic journalist and author of a recent book on the Alaska Grand Jury.

‘Free’ Covid tests from federal government to cost taxpayers billions

The Biden Administration is spending billions of dollars to make free Covid-19 test kits available to Americans starting Sept. 25.

Although some taxpayer somewhere is paying for the kits, the cost to the consumer is nothing. You can request four free test per household through covidtests.gov.

The CDC said the test kits are able to detect the latest Covid variants and can be used through the end of December.

The exact costs of the program are unclear, but in 2022, three companies that provided about 380 million free over-the-counter test kits were awarded $2 billion to do so. That is likely the baseline for the current round of free test kits.

The free testing program comes almost exactly one year after President Joe Biden said that the Covid pandemic was over.

The pandemic is over,” Biden told 60 Minutes on Sept. 19, 2022. “We still have a problem with COVID. We’re still doing a lot of work on it. But the pandemic is over. If you notice, no one’s wearing masks. Everybody seems to be in pretty good shape, and so I think it’s changing, and I think [the Detroit auto show resuming after three years] is a perfect example of it.”

Free test kits were once being handed out like candy in pharmacies and retail outlets, but they are no longer as widely available and insurance companies are no longer reimbursing the cost, after Biden announced the end of the public health emergency on May 11.

Also today, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services announced $600 million in grants to 12 commercial Covid-19 test manufacturers.

The grant is meant to produce about 200 million new over-the-counter Covid tests for future federal government use.

The awardees are almost all in liberal states:

  • $88.7 million for Access Bio in New Jersey.
  • $4.5 million for Advin in California.
  • $61.2 million for Azure in Texas.
  • $86.4 million for CorDx in California.
  • $167 million for iHealth in California.
  • $20.7 million for InBios in Washington.
  • $31.4 million for Kwell Laboratories in California.
  • $49.5 million for Maxim Bio in Maryland.
  • $5.7 million for OraSure Technologies in Pennsylvania.
  • $28.7 million for Princeton BioMeditech in New Jersey.
  • $28.6 million for Quidel in California.
  • $20.5 million for Sekisui in Delaware.

California judge: Schools must tell parents when their children are trying to change genders, names, pronouns

A U.S. District Court judge in San Diego struck down a policy that prevents schools from letting parents know that their children want to change genders.

“A parent’s right to make decisions concerning the care, custody, control and medical care of their children is one of the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests that Americans enjoy,” U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez wrote in his Sept. 14 ruling.

He said that when a school learns that a student has questioned his or her birth gender, or identified as transgender, school officials must notify the parents, even if the student objects. He sees the notification duty the same as when the school would be required to notify parents or guardians if a student had a concussion during soccer practice or was the victim of sexual assault, or has suicidal thoughts.

The ruling comes as Gov. Gavin Newsom has begun taking actions against school districts that pass pro-family parental notification policies. The governor and the state’s attorney general sued the Chino Valley Unified School District last month for a similar parental notification policy.

In July, a U.S. District Court judge in Sacramento threw out a lawsuit against the Chico Unified School District for a similar policy that prevented parents from knowing if their children were going through gender transition. That judge said the venue of the federal court was improper, and the matter should be taken to the state legislature.

The case this month in San Diego involved an Escondido Unified School District policy that says a teacher may not disclose to a parent the fact that a student identifies as a new gender, or wants to be addressed by a new name or new pronouns during the school day – names, genders, or pronouns that are different from the birth name and birth gender of the student. Under the policy at issue, accurate communication with parents is permitted only if the child first gives its consent to the school. A teacher who knowingly fails to comply is considered to have engaged in discriminatory harassment and is subject to adverse employment actions, according to the policy.

That Escondido policy is similar to the one that exists in the Anchorage School District, which limits what parents may know about their children, once those children are under the control of the public school system.

Clothing found in former Energy official Sam Brinton’s closet returned to designer who owns them

20

Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority police have returned articles of clothing belonging to a Tanzanian fashion designer — clothing that was found in the home of ex-Energy Department official Sam Brinton’s home, according to Fox News.

Brinton, a Biden appointee who has a checkered past, including promotion of sado-masochism, being a member of the hate group Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, and being the founder of the child grooming Trevor Project, wore the clothing after allegedly stealing luggage at Ronald Reagan National Airport. A search of Brinton’s Maryland home in May revealed the garments, which the designer, Asya Khamsin, had sued Brinton over.

“The MWAA Police Department can confirm we returned the victim’s property and police retained photos of the evidence for prosecution,” MWAA spokesperson Crystal Nosal told Fox News Digital on Tuesday. “The case is still under adjudication and we cannot release more detailed information.”

Brinton, a transgender advocate who says he is “nonbinary,” was in charge of spent nuclear waste for the Department of Energy.

On the side, he gave presentations on the finer points of kinky sex, such as role-play sex with men dressed as dogs. He founded the Trevor Project, which influenced the Anchorage Assembly to pass an ordinance that makes it a crime for therapists to dissuade children from changing their gender identity or adopting a gay or alternate sexual lifestyle.

Brinton is also facing charges for luggage theft from the airport in Las Vegas after being caught on security camera walking away with someone else’s suitcase. He is facing charges in Minneapolis for a similar theft.

Manhole missing cover in downtown Anchorage after it mysteriously blew

33

The U.S. military may have lost track of an F-35 Stealth fighter jet in South Carolina earlier this week, but today in Anchorage Alaska, a manhole cover blew off its hole in front of City Hall and city workers began searching for it. As of this writing, it had not been found.

Firefighters and other city workers searched the roof of City Hall from the Clerk’s office, but the manhole cover was not spotted. The search continues. Update: The cover was finally found inside the hole.

The missing manhole cover may be related to a power outage reported around City Hall and at the Atwood State Office Building on 7th. Chugach Electric reports that 230 customers in downtown Anchorage are without power at this hour.

Sullivan says legal fees for warriors sickened by water contamination at Camp Lejeune will be capped

15

After over a year of effort, U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan welcomed news that the Department of Justice has instituted caps on the fees trial lawyers can charge in cases representing sick Marines and other individuals impacted by water contamination at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in North Carolina.

The fee limits, which will be applied to existing contracts regardless of the legal pathway a veteran or their family chooses, come after Sen. Sullivan pressed U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland about the issue during two phone conversations in the past two weeks.

Sen. Sullivan, , a member of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, has been fighting to cap lawyers’ fees in Camp Lejeune cases since introducing the Protect Camp Lejeune Victims Ensnared by Trial-lawyers’ Scams (VETS) Act.

Sullivan had pressed for caps of 12 percent for filing paperwork and 17 percent for going to trial. DOJ settled on caps that align with the Federal Tort Claims Act, which are 20 percent and 25 percent, respectively.

“In my eight years in the U.S. Senate, there are few issues I’ve been involved with that more desperately cry out for a just resolution. My Democratic colleagues fought hard to keep attorney’s fees caps out of the Camp Lejeune Justice Act, with the predictable result of unscrupulous trial lawyers trying to grab sixty to seventy percent of the compensation owed to sick Marines and their families, and spending hundreds of millions of dollars to lure Marines into these ultra-high contingency fee arrangements,” said Sen. Sullivan. “I’ve been fighting this injustice tooth and nail for over a year with legislation, unanimous consent requests on the Senate floor, and repeated engagement with the administration. I’m pleased to say, after several productive phone calls, the Attorney General agreed with me. I want to thank Attorney General Garland for doing the right thing, and the countless Marines and Veterans Service Organizations (VSOs) who courageously spoke out and demanded Congress and the administration fix this. While this is excellent news for the thousands of Americans who suffered after serving at Camp Lejeune, I am still concerned that the new caps are too high, given the fact that Congress reduced the burden of proof for these cases, making them significantly easier to win. I’ll continue working with my colleagues to advance my Protect Camp Lejeune VETS Actto set these caps at a just and reasonable level and maximize the compensation for the individuals who actually deserve it.”

Marines and impacted individuals can seek compensation as a result of the Camp Lejeune Justice Act, which became law in August 2022 in the larger Honoring our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act. In May 2022, the Biden Justice Department provided technical guidance on the PACT Act, recommending the legislation cap attorney’s fees. During consideration of the PACT Act, Senate Democrats blocked votes on any amendments, including an amendment to cap legal fees. Since passage of the law, trial lawyers across the country have unleashed over a billion dollars in television ads and social media campaigns, seeking out Marines and other victims for Camp Lejeune-related cases and charging contingency fees reportedly as high as 60 percent. 

Timeline 

  • On March 26, 2021, the Camp Lejeune Justice Act was introduced in the House with attorney’s fees capped at the Federal Tort Claims Act level.
  • On November 4, 2021, companion legislation to the Camp Lejeune Justice Act was introduced in the Senate, but without attorney’s fees capped.
  • On January 25, 2022, a new version of the Camp Lejeune Justice Act was introduced in the House without attorney’s fees capped, aligning with the Senate version.
  • On May 2, 2022, the Justice Department published technical assistance on the PACT Act that recommended including caps on attorney’s fees, “ensuring that the bulk of recovery in each case will go to the veterans themselves and not to their lawyers.”
  • On August 10, 2022, President Biden signed the PACT Act into law, without caps on Camp Lejeune attorney’s fees.
  • In October 2022, the American Legion passed a resolution asking Congress to pass legislation capping the Camp Lejeune attorneys’ fees.
  • On November 11, 2022, Sen. Sullivan criticized some of his committee colleagues in an SVAC hearing for enabling predatory trial lawyers to take advantage of sick Marines and called on the committee to institute caps through legislation immediately.
  • On November 30, 2022, Sens. Sullivan, Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), Joni Ernst (R-Iowa), Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), and Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.) attempted to passSullivan’s Protect Camp Lejeune VETS Act by unanimous consent, but the motion was blocked by Senate Democrats.
  • On December 15, 2022, Sen. Sullivan spoke on the Senate floor about the Camp Lejeune issue.
  • On February 10, 2023, Sens. Sullivan, Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), and nine other senators were joined by Representatives Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) and Mike Bost (R-Ill.) in re-introducing the Protect Camp Lejeune VETS Act in both the Senate and the House.
  • On March 1, 2023, in a joint hearing of SVAC and the House Veterans Affairs Committee, Sen. Sullivan again called on his SVAC colleagues to institute caps.
  • On March 6, 2023, the Wall Street Journal published an editorial on the topic titled, “The Camp Lejeune Lawsuit Racket.”
  • On May 17, 2023, in an SVAC hearing, Sen. Sullivan again urged his committee colleagues to institute caps.
  • On July 13, 2023, Sen. Sullivan filed his Protect Camp Lejeune VETS Act as an amendment to the FY 2024 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), but it was blocked by Senate Democrats.
  • In September 5, 2023, Sen. Sullivan and Rep. Issa sent a letter to the Navy requesting that they create an expedited and optional pathway for veterans and their families in order to settle Camp Lejeune cases faster.
  • On September 6, 2023, Sen. Sullivan spoke with Attorney General Garland about the issue, reminding the attorney general that DOJ had strongly supported the inclusion of caps in its guidance on the PACT Act before it passed.
  • On September 7, 2023, the Navy announced an optional pathway to expedite claims for veterans, following all of the requests included in Sen. Sullivan’s letter, but without attorney’s fees capped.
  • On September 15, 2023, Attorney General Garland called Sen. Sullivan to inform him that DOJ would be instituting attorney’s fees caps in Camp Lejeune cases.
  • On September 18, 2023, Sen. Sullivan spoke with Veterans Affairs Secretary McDonough and Navy Secretary Del Toro about coordinating an effort to communicate these new fee caps to Camp Lejeune victims and attorneys.