By DAVID BOYLE
Even though the Anchorage School Board doesn’t do a good job running its own schools, it seems to want to tell the MatSu School Board how to structure and run its meetings.
At the Anchorage School Board’s most recent meeting, student representative Joshua Pak said the MatSu School Board was reducing the visibility of its student representative by changing its policy.
Joshua stated that the MatSu School Board wants to reduce its student representative to provide only a short report. He found it “shocking” that the MatSu Board did this.
The only change to the MatSu Board Policy 9110 is to remove the student representative from the board dais, not to remove the student representative’s voice. The vote was 5-2 in favor of the change.
As a result, Joshua is planning to write a resolution to “condemn” the actions of the MatSu Board. He is rounding up all the state’s school board student representatives to work on the resolution condemning the MatSu Board.
Maybe he should stay in his own lane and “condemn” the actions of the Anchorage School Board and Superintendent Jharrett Bryantt for removing the charter of the Family Partnership Charter School earlier this year, which drove many students out of the district altogether.
Board member Andy Holleman also voiced his disagreement with the MatSu Board saying that it was a “gift” or “accommodation” to have a student representative on the board.
It’s interesting that Holleman pays so much attention to the MatSu Board’s meetings and seems to have coordinated beforehand with Joshua in the condemnation of the MatSu Board.
Holleman also seems very concerned that students should have a voice greater than the parents or other Anchorage taxpayers. He said, “There are not a lot of venues for students to speak except for the three minutes to speak at a board meeting.”
Holleman should know that parents also only get three minutes of democracy to voice their concerns to the board. Why should a student get more time than parents to speak?
While Margo Bellamy was board president, the Anchorage School Board put students first in line to testify, even before parents, in the public testimony period.
Because there is only one hour allotted for early public testimony parents are pushed to the back of the line for their testimony — maybe even to the end of the meeting, which can come several hours later.
Holleman believes that it is very important the student representative has the opportunity to ask questions.
“Having a place where you can ask questions as things are presented to us…makes this a better board,” he said.
Parents can ask questions at board meetings but the board is directed to not respond to those questions. Holleman believes students should be heard but parents should not be able to question the board and get answers.
Holleman said he was very disappointed in how the MatSu Board treated its student representative.
“It was terrible how they treated the student representative,” he said.
Holleman further stated that students were the clientele of the district and should have a seat at the table. It appears hearing the students is more important to the board. Holleman believes unless a student representative is sitting at the dais with the board, that voice is not heard.
The fact that the student representative on another school board isn’t at the dais seems to be the major issue for him.
Maybe member Holleman should concentrate more on student attendance, graduation rates and other metrics showing student progress in Anchorage, which are historically low.
Attendance in grades 9-12 in May of 2023 was just 51.6%.
Students in grades 9-12 on track for graduation in June 2023 was a dismal 70.4%
The four-year graduation rate in Spring 2023 was an unimpressive 81%.
Here is the chart presented to the board at the Sept. 5 meeting:

Board member Holleman and Student Representative Pak should stay in their own lane and improve education outcomes for all Anchorage students.
