Wednesday, August 13, 2025
Home Blog Page 540

Lisa Murkowski doubles down: She’d vote for Manchin over Trump or Biden

Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski told a PBS interviewer today that given the choice between President Joe Biden or former President Donald Trump, she would vote for West Virginia Democrat Sen. Joe Manchin for president.

“If it’s a match-up between Biden and Trump, I know exactly where I’d go. I would go with Joe Manchin,” Murkowski told Margaret Hoover, host of Firing Line.

“I am one who doesn’t like to use my vote for the lesser of two evils. I want to be proactive in who I think could do the job,” she said. Murkowski endorsed Democrat Mary Peltola for the House of Representatives in 2022.

Manchin, a centrist, has been for Democrats what Murkowski is for Republicans — an unreliable vote for their extreme platform.

Some have speculated that Manchin may run for president as a third-party and that rumor was given oxygen when he was featured at a town hall in New Hampshire, organized by No Labels, a new group pushing independent candidates.

Murkowski said people are hungry want a president who is “offering something in the middle.” She defended Alaska’s new open primary and ranked-choice voting general elections, saying she believes it is a model for other states to deliver results that are less partisan.

Murkowski’s idea of what it means to be less partisan may be at odds with the record of Peltola, who is extremely partisan, if she’s judged by her voting record, which is in line with radical House members of The Squad. Alaskans will be the judge in 2024, during the next congressional election.

Manchin appeared earlier this week at a town hall in New Hampshire that was sponsored by political organization No Labels, sparking conversation of a possible third-party bid for the West Virginia senator.

Manchin and Murkowski are considered allies in the Senate and have a close, collaborative relationship.

Hayden Ludwig: Dark money bought ranked-choice voting in Alaska. Will dark money keep it in 2024?

By HAYDEN LUDWIG | RESTORATION of AMERICA

Alaska may be a red state, but it won’t be for long if leftists get their way. In recent years the state has become one of the Left’s favorite “dark money” dumping grounds in an effort to give Democrats an unlikely edge in the Republican stronghold. 

It’s an old trick: If you can’t win the game, change the rules.

That’s the real story behind Alaskans for Better Elections (ABE), the lobbying group responsible for Ballot Measure 2, the 2020 initiative that enacted the state’s now-infamous ranked-choice voting system and supposedly exposed “dark money.” 

If you don’t understand ranked-choice voting, that’s the point. It’s a confusing, byzantine approach to balloting that unexpectedly gave Alaska its first Democratic congresswoman, Mary Peltola, in nearly 50 years—in a state that broke for Trump 53-43 percent in 2020—something the New York Times happily credits to the novel voting scheme.

Not that even Democrats can agree on the merits of ranked-choice voting. In fact, the D.C. Democratic Party voted against adopting ranked-choice voting in May because they feared it would “undermine the strength of Democrats” in the district. Democrats across the Potomac in Arlington County also gave the measure a shot—the first to do so anywhere in my own state, Virginia—only to quietly drop the scheme just last week. Why? Even the election board responsible for the experiment couldn’t explain how it worked.

But that’s no problem because Democrats already control Arlington and D.C. Ranked-choice voting was always meant to give them inroads into red states otherwise inaccessible to their candidates and ideas—like Alaska.

From Colorado with Cash

Pro-Measure 2 groups outspent conservatives nearly 12–1 in 2020 yet only won by less than 3,800 votes—a narrow triumph of “dark money” over… “dark money.”

How so? According to public disclosures, ABE is overwhelmingly funded by “progressive” mega-donors in New York, California, Colorado, Texas, Wisconsin—just about anywhere except for, you know, Alaska.

And ABE admits this, proudly calling its out-of-state contributors “philanthropists dedicated to addressing the most pressing problems facing the country”—as if Alaskans never held a fair election prior to enacting ranked-choice voting. So who are these donors? 

John Arnold is an Enron alumnus and hedge fund investor who made his billions trading so-called fossil fuels. Now he’s pumped at least $23 million into groups that want to tax people and businesses for using those CO2-emitting fuels. Not surprisingly, pro-carbon tax groups also supported Measure 2. Arnold’s “philanthropy,” the Houston-based Arnold Ventures, has cut checks to ABE since 2019; yet it’s structured as an LLC, not a nonprofit, so it doesn’t file public disclosures, the very definition of “dark money.”

Then there’s FairVote, the far-left group behind ranked-choice voting in Arlington County. FairVote also supports abolishing the Electoral College and automatic voter registration, two of the Left’s favorite election “reforms” du jour.

Kathryn and James (son of Rupert) Murdoch have pumped tens of millions of dollars into even more extreme “green” groups, such as the Environmental Defense Fund, which used $11 million from the pair’s philanthropy in 2019 to lobby against gas and oil production. Kathryn was a top donor to super PACs backing Hillary Clinton in 2016, and even directed the Clinton Foundation’s global warming initiative—whose contributions mysteriously sank after Hillary failed to clinch the presidency.

The New York pair’s money-funnel of choice: Unite America, a Denver-based group that pumped $3.7 million into ABE from 2019–2021. Unite America pretends to be a middle-of-the-road, “country over party” group but its board (which includes Kathryn) leans decidedly left. 

That board also includes Katherine Gehl, an ABE supporter based in Wisconsin. Gehl’s also on the board of New America, a “centrist” think tank led by ex-Obama administration officials and funded by former Google CEO Eric Schmidt. Centrist indeed; New America was behind “creation care,” a faux-biblical scheme to seduce Evangelicals into buying the Left’s global warming and split off from the Republican Party.

Besides Alaska, Unite America is behind ranked-choice voting campaigns in Pennsylvania, Virginia, Nevada, Arizona, Maine, Oklahoma, and dozens of municipalities; it also funds Bill Kristol’s NeverTrump group Defending Democracy Together (delightfully acronymed DDT).

The Left Strikes Back

Now ABE is turning its guns on conservative groups trying to roll back ranked-choice voting with a new ballot measure. This week, ABE filed a complaint against Preserve Democracy alleging campaign finance and lobbying violations. The complaints follow similar efforts to block signature-gathering campaign by a related conservative group, Alaskans for Honest Elections

It’s called lawfare—winning with legal miscellanea what you can’t in a fair fight—and the Left excels at it. 

But the complaints suggest that Alaska conservatives are onto something big in battling ranked-choice voting if they can gather enough signatures to get on the 2024 ballot. Americans across the country are waking up to the Left’s Big Money plots, and it’s got “progressives” running scared.

Of course, this is far from the first time D.C. “progressives” have bankrolled a campaign to fool Alaskans. In September, I reported on how D.C. groups—led by the $1.6 billion “dark money” lobbying machine created by Arabella Advisors—ran the campaign to block Alaska’s proposed constitutional convention

Their spin: Stop “outside special interest groups and dark money” from promoting their own agenda over that of Alaskans. Did they think no one would notice?

That group, Defend Our Constitution, and ABE both share a common board member in ex-attorney general Bruce Botelho (D). Both use the services of Ship Creek Group, the consultancy founded by John-Henry Heckendorn, a political operative whom liberal Politico once gushed over as “reviving progressivism” in Alaska with an article titled “How to Turn a Red State Purple (Democrats Not Required).”

In other words, it’s an out-of-state grift to get red Alaska to fall in line with blue states. Don’t let them buy you.

Hayden Ludwig is the director of research for Restoration of America.

Anchorage School District has secret forms for children’s gender identity that parents will never see due to interpretation of HIPAA laws

It’s back-to-school season and the Anchorage School District has a form for students who want to be treated as a different sex by the district.

The form allows transgender students to provide both their birth name and their preferred name, whether they want to use the boys’ or girls’ locker room, and which bathroom they want to use.

The form clearly says it will not be shared with anyone except those who legitimately “need to know.” Children can go by a different name at school, in other words, and the workaround the district has found is the “nickname” field in school student management plan forms.

The students using this no-parents-allowed system need to fill out the form anew if they transfer schools, and both the student and principal are to sign the contract. No parents are involved and, according to the contract, are not included in the “need to know” group.

“Parents and others (counselor, nurse, teachers who have a need to know) may be included in this meeting depending on what is needed to develop a plan for the individual. ‘Need to know’ staff includes those individuals who provide a direct service, activity or program to the transgender individual,” the school district’s manual says.

“The plan is developed by the principal or administrator, in consultation with the student or employee, and with others as deemed appropriate by the principal or administrator and approved by the student or employee. Note: If the student has an IEP or 504 Plan, or the employee has an accommodation plan, the provisions in these plans should be taken into consideration in developing a plan for addressing transgender issues,” the guideline says.

In greater detail, the school districts takes pains to cut parents out of the process:

While medical documentation is not required, the school may request such documentation if helpful to develop an appropriate plan for the student or employee.

If the parties are uncertain or disagree regarding elements to be included in the plan, the site administrator should consult with the Title IX Coordinator.

Students may also use the Student Grievance Process to address any civil rights issue, including transgender issues at school.

A copy of the final plan should be maintained in the student’s health file or the employee’s unit file and a copy sent to the Title IX Coordinator.

Mandatory permanent student and employee records will include the legal/birth name and legal/birth gender. However, to the extent that the district is not legally required to use a student’s or employee’s legal/birth name and gender on other school records or documents, the school will use the name and gender preferred by the student or employee. For example, student ID cards are not legal documents so could use the student’s preferred name.

A student’s preferred name can be entered in the student information system using the “nickname” field.

Only upon receipt of a court order or other legal documentation will the school/district change a student’s or employee’s official record to reflect a change in legal/birth name or gender. All such changes will be made pursuant to a court order or through amendment of state or federally issued identification.

Read the Anchorage School District transgender policy here.

Win Gruening: Juneau Assembly’s Transparency Deficit Disorder

By WIN GRUENING

Controversies surrounding Juneau Assembly actions regarding property tax assessments and millage rates, efforts to build expensive public buildings rejected by voters, and spending tax money to influence municipal elections, have all left our city leaders unfazed.

Assembly members continue to ignore growing community concerns expressed at the voting booth and in public testimony.  For a group that normally conducts its business by covering all their bases, this seems almost reckless.  They have chosen to pursue their agenda with little, if any, public explanation.

The July 10 Assembly meeting provides another example of the lack of transparency that permeates recent decisions.  During that meeting, the following ordinances were among those up for public hearings:

  • Creating a Short-Term Rental Registration Program
  • Authorizing the Manager to Convey Approximately 11.5 Acres of Property Located at Pederson Hill to Tlingit Haida Regional Housing Authority for Less Than Fair Market Value
  • Authorizing the Issuance of General Obligation Bonds in the Principal Amount of Not to Exceed $27,000,000 to Finance Construction and Equipping of a New City Hall
  • Appropriating $8,100,000 to the Manager for the Purchase of the Juneau Bone and Joint Center Property

While testimony on these ordinances was not extremely heavy, it was passionate, almost uniformly against, and echoed opinions published recently in the Juneau Empire. Six Juneau residents who spoke about the City Hall ordinance opposed it strongly. No one testified in favor of it. Nevertheless, all the ordinances were approved unanimously.

During a break in the meeting, it was revealed that at least one Assembly member, probably more, had received emails from the public supporting approvals of some or all of the above ordinances. Traditionally, it has been standard practice to provide copies of these emails in the Assembly Packet, yet this was not done.

At a minimum, any email, texts, or letters constituting public testimony should be disclosed to the public.  If these communications are persuading Assembly members to vote unanimously in favor of ordinances, despite near-unanimous opposition during public hearings, it makes the necessity for this disclosure obvious. How else can the public openly address arguments being made for and against an issue?

With none of the people sending these emails showing up to testify at the public meeting, it leaves the impression they knew their presence was not necessary because the issue had essentially been decided in advance.

Non-disclosure of written communication to Assembly members, for or against any pending action, robs the public of the right to know who is influencing their elected officials. While it may not violate the Open Meetings Act, it certainly flouts the spirit of it.  

But that wasn’t the only example of the Assembly’s transparency deficit that night.

Toward the end of the meeting, long after most audience members had left, Mayor Beth Weldon made a surprise announcement nominating former Assembly member Loren Jones to fill the position of resigning member Carole Triem.

There was no discussion of the proposed appointment, and it was unanimously approved.

On its face, there is nothing wrong with filling a vacant Assembly seat, but, with only three regular meetings remaining before Juneau’s municipal election and the 10-day filing period for seats occurring just four days later, it seemed unusual, unnecessary, and possibly prejudicial. 

Jones, a 9-year Assembly veteran, who termed-out in 2020, presumably could keep the seat warm for the next occupant, but what if that happens to be him?  Neither Mayor Weldon nor Loren Jones have indicated whether he intends to run again for the seat.  If he does, the appointment will confer the huge advantage of incumbency to his campaign.

More than that, it raises the question of whether Assembly members agreed to the appointment in advance.

Given the Assembly’s record thus far, it’s not out of the question.

Why not some Juneau Empire opinion pieces from the Mayor or other Assembly members responding to published public concerns?  Justify Jones’ appointment, why communications with Assembly members aren’t being disclosed, and why it’s ethical to spend public money on political advocacy.

We hear a lot from the Juneau City Manager, but very little from the actual decision makers.

Transparency starts with communication and it’s best received earlier in the process, not later.

After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening became a regular opinion page columnist for the Juneau Empire. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations.

Downing: Alaskans are represented by Peltola and The Squad today, but can do better in 2024

By SUZANNE DOWNING

Rep. Mary Peltola continues to have support among left-leaning Lower 48 politicos after she emerged victorious in Alaska’s messy open-primary, ranked-choice general voting system in 2022.

Conservative Alaska voters, faced with a contentious field last year, awarded Peltola enough second-place votes to lock in her win.

As a candidate with low name recognition, Peltola committed to bipartisanship, saying she drew inspiration from the late Congressman Don Young. However, her voting record since November has revealed a different story. 

Peltola’s support for Rep. Hakeem Jeffries as House Speaker, casting 15 votes in his favor, was the first big item that raised eyebrows around the 49th state. 

She voted against the Strategic Production Response Act and justified her absence during the final vote by claiming she was unaware voting was about to occur.

Peltola voted against the censure of Rep. Adam Schiff, who was the unethical impeachment manager for Speaker Nancy Pelosi during the now-discredited “Russia collusion” attack on former President Donald Trump.

Recently, she joined most Democrats in opposing the National Defense Authorization Act. The rationale behind her “no” vote lies in her desire for culture-war earmarks to fund military transgender treatments and surgeries, as well as paying military women a month of leave for late-term abortions. Peltola has also supported transgender males’ participation in female athletic competitions.

She voted against H.R. 5, the Parents Bill of Rights, and has been advocating for a national railroad strike, urging Starbucks baristas to unionize, and encouraging pizza workers in Alaska to do the same.

Peltola’s consistent absence is notable: She has missed 16 times more votes than the median Democrat House member. In a House with 435 members, she is Number 12 for most missed votes.

While she participated in the women’s Congressional Softball game against journalists, she failed to show up for work the next day when almost all amendments to the National Defense Appropriations Act were voted on. Her inability to get out of bed deprives Alaskans of a voice in the House.

When she does vote, Peltola votes in line with Rep. Nancy Pelosi 84 percent of the time, Rep. Ilhan Omar 77 percent, and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez 78 percent. Keep in mind that 53 percent of Alaskans voted for Trump.

Nick Begich, a lifelong Republican who ran for Congress in 2022, has seen enough. He decided to run again after witnessing Peltola repeatedly vote against Alaska’s values. 

Although he faces the challenge of overcoming his relatives, who include well-known Democrats, Begich enjoys the continued support of his followers.

But Alaska’s unique method of selecting representatives, introduced with Ballot Measure 2 in 2020, deviates from the rest of the nation. It’s a tangled mess.

The open primary format eliminated the Republican Party of Alaska’s ability to independently choose its candidate for the general election. 

Instead, all candidates, whether clowns or statesmen, participate in the same primary ballot. In 2022, this resulted in a massive ballot with 48 candidates. 

The top four vote getters from the primary advance to the general election, where voters are then asked to rank the candidates in order of preference. If a voter’s preferred candidate loses, their vote is transferred to their next choice, granting them an opportunity to vote again. In this scheme, some voters get to vote more than once, while others’ votes are counted just one time.

Given the array of choices Alaskan voters had in November, which included three conservatives and one liberal candidate selected in the primary, it remains perplexing how a radical like Peltola emerged victorious. 

Supporters of ranked-choice voting had promised that the system would eliminate extremists, but this is not how it worked in real life. Alaskans ended up with a de facto member of The Squad.

Will it happen again?

Begich begins his campaign with a solid base of one quarter of the likely vote this time around. However, with less than a year remaining until the primary ballot is set in Alaska, a lot can happen with campaign hijinks, as we saw in 2022.

Last year, Begich garnered support from major conservative organizations like Americans for Prosperity and Freedom Works for America, as well as the endorsement of the Alaska Republican Party. 

And yet, the National Republican Congressional Committee is not structured to work well with the ranked-choice voting system, which in a state like Alaska all but guarantees the presence of multiple Republicans on a general election ballot.

This time around, the NRCC can and should focus on highlighting Peltola’s extreme positions to ensure that Alaskans can make a more informed decision in the upcoming 2024 primary and general elections.

For now, Alaskans are represented by a bait-and-switcher who holds some of the most mind-boggling positions in the history of the U.S. Congress. Alaska has the distinction of being the most conservative district in the country to be represented by a Democrat. We can do better.

National organizations like the NRCC, Freedom Works, Americans for Prosperity, and Club for Growth will be crucial in helping prevent a recurrence of 2022’s series of unfortunate events.

Suzanne Downing is publisher of Must Read Alaska.

International cycling body bans transgenders from women’s races

The world governing organization for competitive cycling has announced new rules that end the participation of transgender competitors in women’s cycling events under the group’s umbrella.

The Union Cycliste Internationale, formed in 1900 in Paris and now based in Switzerland, said the rule chance went into effect July 17, following a symposium in June to consider the conditions for including of transgender athletes in women’s cycling competitions.

The June meeting brought together transgender and regular gender athletes, experts from scientific, legal, and human rights fields, as well as sporting institutions. Participants were given the opportunity to present their positions on the controversial subject. The final decision was made July 5 by the group’s management committee.

Over the past couple of year, men who take hormones and now present as women have won numerous cycling races around the world, resulting in some women leaving the sport because of the unfairness of allowing competitors with distinct biological advantages.

Under the new rules, transgender athletes who have transitioned after male puberty will no longer be permitted to participate in women’s events across all categories in the various disciplines featured on the UCI international calendar.

However, for international masters events, which include races on the UCI Cycling for All International Calendar and UCI events such as the UCI Gran Fondo World Series, UCI Gran Fondo World Championships, UCI Gravel World Series, UCI Gravel World Championships, and UCI Masters World Championships, the men’s category will be renamed “Men/Open.” Trans athletes who do not meet the criteria for participation in women’s events will be allowed to compete in this category.

In Alaska, a public comment period is now open through July 21 for those who want to weigh in on new rules that are intended to protect girl competitors in Alaska schools. The new rules are being considered by the Alaska State Board of Education and Early Development.

Not all bike races fall under the umbrella of UCI, but it is the highest governing body for bike racing, issuing racing licenses to riders and enforcing disciplinary rules, such as bans against doping and what types of bike wheels can be used in different races. The UCI also manages the classification of races and how points are awarded in road, track, mountain biking, BMX, cyclocross and others, in both the amateur and professional categories. It is the management organization for the World Championships.

The UCI Management Committee said it based its decision on the current state of scientific knowledge, acknowledging that there is no confirmation that two years of gender-affirming hormone therapy, with a target plasma testosterone concentration of 2.5 nmol/L, is sufficient to eliminate the advantages conferred by male puberty’s effects on testosterone.

The committee also said it recognizes that considerable individual variability exists in response to gender hormone therapy, making it difficult to draw definitive conclusions regarding its effects. Other biomechanical factors, such as bone structure and arrangement in the limbs, may potentially provide lasting advantages to men who have undergone transgender treatments.

While recognizing the interests of transgender athletes being able to participate in competitions, the management committee concluded that it was necessary to prioritize the protection of the female category and ensure equal opportunities. The decision aims to maintain a level playing field for all competitors while considering the scientific uncertainties surrounding the effects of hormone treatment.

The FINA international swimming governing body took a different approach earlier this year, by ruling that transgenders who had already gone through male puberty may not compete in the women’s races, but the group left wiggle room for transgenders who block hormones to prevent them from going through male puberty. Doctors are increasingly giving hormones to underage youth to block puberty as the medical field embraces the ability of children to choose their gender through lifelong drugs and genital mutilation.

The UCI also announced it will initiate discussions with other international sporting bodies regarding the co-financing of a research program to study the physical performance changes in highly-trained athletes undergoing transitional hormone treatment. B

“The UCI fully respects and supports the right of individuals to choose the sex that corresponds to their gender identity, whatever sex they were assigned at birth. However, it has a duty to guarantee, above all, equal opportunities for all competitors in cycling competitions,” said UCI President David Lappartient.

MTG brings the receipts on Hunter Biden’s self-made sex tapes; she puts them in Congressional Record

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia brought a photo lineup into the House Oversight Committee’s IRS whistleblower hearing that is one for the ages.

It was a montage of photographs of President Joe Biden’s son, Hunter, naked, having sex with different women. The pictures were carefully blocked out in places to avoid showing the actual private parts of Hunter or the women’s faces.

The hearing was about a criminal case over at the Justice Department pertaining to Hunter Biden and his tax evasion problems.

“Before we begin, I would like to let the committee and everyone watching at home that parental discretion is advised,” Greene said before showing the poster boards. She then talked about Hunter Biden’s various sexual escapades with sex-trafficked women.

“If he was purchasing her a plane ticket for sex and traveling across state lines, do you believe that to be a violation of the Mann Act?” she asked the witness.  

The Mann Act is an anti-trafficking law that prohibits the transportation of “any woman or girl for the purpose of prostitution or debauchery, or for any other immoral purpose.” It has since been amended and expanded.

The description on one of the pictures said “Hunter recorded multiple sex tapes with a prostitute he paid for out of his law firm’s bank account.”

“This is evidence of Hunter Biden making pornography,” Greene said to the committee.

Rep. Jaime Raskin, a Democrat from Maryland, was horrified at the presentation, which has been condemned by Democrats like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and mainstream liberal media.

“Should we be displaying this, Mr. Chairman?” the ranking member Raskin asked.

“Frankly, I don’t care who you are in this country, no one deserves that. It is abuse. It is abusive,” Ocasio-Cortez said.

The photos were from the laptop that belonged to Hunter Biden but that was left abandoned at a Delaware computer shop in 2019. The MacBook Pro is now in the hands of the FBI, which has been investigating whether Hunter Biden reported income from his various and sundry business dealings.

The witnesses in the hearing, Joseph Ziegler and Gary Shapley, said Hunter indeed made inappropriate business deductions related to a sex club membership and escorts.

Sullivan pushes back against liberal media bias, woke Pentagon, and Democrats’ war on military readiness

The House has passed the National Defense Authorization Act last week, stripped of its worse Democrat culture war items. Today, Sen. Dan Sullivan of Alaska said he stands with the House Republicans who voted for the bill, without the bizarre Democrat amendments.

As someone in the military, Sullivan is concerned about the politicization of the military under Joe Biden. Sullivan made a Facebook video to vent about how the media has covered the NDAA and how media outlets have accused Republicans of a culture war, when in fact it is Democrats who are waging that war.

“I’m standing in front of the headquarters of the Veterans of Foreign Wars, the VFW post headquarters here in Washington, D.C., a testament to the men and women in our country, in the military, who’ve kept us free for centuries. Now, some of you may have been reading recently in the mainstream media about how Republicans—particularly now, this time in the House, on the National Defense Authorization Act, which we are working on right now here in the U.S. Senate and in the House—have somehow inserted cultural issues and social issues into this bill,” he said.

Sullivan quoted a PBS story: “House Republicans add culture war issues to the traditionally bipartisan defense bill.”

Then he quoted one from The New York Times: “Hard right Presses Culture Wars on Defense Bill, Imperiling Passage.”

After that, Sullivan read the headline from the The Washington Post: “House Republicans Wage Woke Culture Wars with the Military.”

Sullivan said nothing could be further from the truth than what people are reading in the mainstream liberal media.

“Here’s the truth. Republicans aren’t inserting anything. What we are doing is pushing back against a Pentagon that has inserted these kinds of social issues, cultural issues into the military,” he said.

Sullivan, who has been a Marine Corps infantry officer for almost 30 years said he has never seen a Pentagon led by civilians who focus more on issues, social issues that have absolutely nothing to do with war fighting or lethality.

“Let me give you the mission of the Marine Corps Infantry: It is to locate, find, and destroy the enemies of America through fire and maneuver,” he said.

“The Pentagon right now is doing things that have nothing to do with this kind of war fighting ethos.

He gave examples of how he and other Republicans are pushing back, through their oversight role in Congress:

  • “The Secretary of the Navy is much more interested in climate change—he got his climate action plan out to the Congress about a year and a half ago—than he is in shipbuilding and war fighting and the requirement for him to have amphibious ships that can make sure Marines deploy around the world, none of which he is doing right now.”
  • “The Undersecretary of Defense for policy, the number three guy in the Pentagon, ended his confirmation hearing by saying one of his top priorities was ‘to stamp out systemic racism within the ranks.’ This is a guy who’s never served in the ranks. This is a guy, when I pressed him—do you have any data on besmirching the whole military as systemically racist?—he didn’t have that. The truth is, the U.S. military, while not perfect, is certainly one of the most exemplary civil rights organizations in American history.
  • The Biden administration’s Pentagon is paying active duty troops for transgender surgeries
    “when we don’t have enough money to address suicide prevention, particularly in places like Alaska, where the issue of suicide with our active duty troops is particularly acute. None of these things that the Biden Pentagon is doing have anything to do with war fighting,  have anything to do with lethality, or have anything to do with winning wars.” 

Sullivan defended the oversight role that Republicans are providing in the Armed Services Committee to get the Pentagon back on track, and focused on lethality and winning America’s wars.

Throughout the liberal media, including the Anchorage Daily News, reporters and editors have been accusing Republicans of waging a culture war. It has become the new dog whistle phrase to unite Democrats to the battle for forcing taxpayers to pay for transgender treatments and surgeries, providing them with sex hormones, and sexualizing them before they are old enough to know what is happening.

Shishaldin Volcano starts to quiet down

The recent eruption of Shishaldin Volcano has decreased in intensity, leading to a reduction in the Aviation Color Code and Volcano Alert Level.

According to current observations by the Alaska Volcano Observatory, the volcano is still emitting low-level ash below 10,000 feet above sea level, with ash drifting to the south. The Aviation Color Code has been downgraded to orange, and the Volcano Alert Level has been lowered to watch.

On Tuesday, a significant ash plume was detected, starting at approximately 7 am AKDT (15:00 UTC), reaching an altitude of around 30,000 feet above sea level.

By 9:30 am AKDT (17:30 UTC), satellite data revealed that the primary plume had detached, but residual low-level ash was still emanating. The detached plume remains visible between 60 and 280 miles away from the volcano. In response to this cloud, the National Weather Service has issued a SIGMET (Significant Meteorological Information) advisory.

Explosive eruptive activity can resume rapidly and with little warning. Previous eruptions of Shishaldin have produced minor to significant ash clouds. Consequently, the volcano is closely monitored using local seismic and infrasound sensors, web cameras, and a telemetered geodetic network.

While the local monitoring network is partially impaired, the Alaska Volcano Observatory is employing nearby geophysical networks, satellite data, and regional infrasound and lighting data to detect any signs of activity. AVO will continue to closely monitor the volcanic unrest at Shishaldin.

Hazard analysis reveals that there is a possibility of trace ashfall downwind of the volcano, while mud flows are likely to occur on all flanks, the observatory said.

Shishaldin Volcano is situated near the center of Unimak Island in the eastern Aleutian Islands. A visually striking, symmetric cone, it has a base diameter of approximately 10 miles. Its funnel-shaped summit crater measures 660 feet wide and typically emits a steam plume and occasional small amounts of ash.

Shishaldin is one of the most active volcanoes in the Aleutian volcanic arc, having experienced at least 54 episodes of unrest, including over 26 confirmed eruptions since 1824.

While most eruptions have been relatively small, the April-May 1999 event produced an ash column that reached a height of 45,000 ft above sea level.

As observers monitor the situation, residents and pilots are warned by the FAA to steer clear of the area through Aug. 14. Shishaldin is about 58 miles from the Cold Bay airport, which also serves King Cove and neighboring villages and towns.