Thursday, June 18, 2026
Home Blog Page 506

Sullivan: President needs to order lethal response to killing of soldiers in Jordan

Alaska U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said a red line has been crossed with the killing of three members of the U.S. military, in an attack by Iranian-backed proxies that wounded over two dozen more American military members.

It was the first time U.S. troops have been killed since Oct. 7, when Hamas invaded Israel, upsetting the fragile peace in the region. Since then, troops have warded off over 158 attacks on them by drones and missiles since The previous attacks only resulted in minor injuries and damage to American equipment and infrastructure.

An earlier version of this report mistakenly identified the men killed. The names will be updated here when available.

Update II: The fallen are Sgt. William Jerome Rivers, 46 Spc. Kennedy Ladon Sanders, 24 Spc. Breonna Alexsondria Moffett, 23.

“Our hearts today are with the family members of the three courageous service members who made the ultimate sacrifice in defense of our country and our allies. We also continue to pray as a nation for the heroes who are recovering from their injuries,” Sullivan told Must Read Alaska.

“Iranian terrorist proxies have crossed a red line with the reported killing of 3 brave U.S. service members and wounding of dozens more,” Sullivan said. “This strike, and the 150+ attacks our forces have sustained in recent months, shows the dangers of the Biden administration’s appeasement of Iran in the past three years and the administration’s total failure to enact deterrence in the region—something I’ve been pushing to reverse for years. The President needs to order a clear, lethal and overwhelming response that demonstrates to Iran and to the world that whoever targets our men and women in uniform—or supports these attacks—will face the full might of the U.S. military.”

Sullivan said just officially designating the Houthi rebels as terrorists is not nearly enough.

Sen. Roger Wicker, the ranking Republican member of the Armed Services Committee, also released a statement:

“It is time to act with purpose and resolve in response to attacks that have tragically taken the lives of American service members and injured scores more. We must respond to these repeated attacks by Iran and its proxies by striking directly against Iranian targets and its leadership. It is time to act swiftly and decisively for the whole world to see.”

Background, as provided by Sullivan’s office:

On Nov. 2, 2023, Sen. Sullivan led 12 of his Senate Republican colleagues in a letter to Secretary of State Antony Blinken, demanding the Biden administration press for a broader, more permanent framework of sanctions on Iran from the United Nations Security Council. 

On Nov. 14, 2023, Sens. Sullivan and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), and a number of their Senate colleagues, introduced a resolution emphasizing the fact that deterrence is most credible when the President keeps all options on the table, including the use of military force, to deter attacks from Iran and its proxies.

On Dec. 12, 2023, Sen. Sullivan and several of his colleagues again sent a letter to Secretary Blinken, urging him to re-designate the Houthis as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO), as well as Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGT).

On Jan. 12, 2024, Sen. Sullivan expressed his support for the strikes on the Houthi rebels in Yemen, which he said were “long overdue.”

On Jan. 12, 2024, in an interview with NBC’s Kristen Welker, Sen. Sullivan reiterated his call on the Biden administration to reestablish deterrence with regard to Iran, and argued that tougher action against Iran and its proxies will help avoid a wider war, not appeasement.

On Jan. 17, 2024, Sen. Sullivan said the decision to redesignate the Houthi rebels as an SDGT is a “step forward” that “doesn’t go far enough.”

As Anchorage leftists try to remove power-generating Eklutna Dam, Northwest lawmakers move to protect Snake River dams from Biden’s bulldozer

Anchorage Assembly members trying to remove the Eklutna Dam are not seeing much in the way of formal resistance from lawmakers or even the public, at this point.

But in the hydro-rich Northwest states of the Lower 48, Republican members of Congress are proposing legislation to protect the power-generating Lower Snake River dams. They have introduced the “DAMN Act,” which stands for “Defending Against Manipulative Negotiators” Act.

The act was introduced by Republican Reps. Dan Newhouse and Cathy McMorris Rodgers of Eastern Washington, Lori Chavez-DeRemer and Cliff Bentz of Oregon, and Russ Fulcher of Idaho. The legislation seeks to bar any federal funding to stop or significantly change the operations of the dams on the Snake River, and blocks implementation of an EarthJustice-promoted project that was announced by the Biden Administration in December, the Columbia Basin Restorative Initiative.

The White House Council on Environmental Quality and the Biden initiative are calling for restoration of salmon runs on the Snake, which provides renewable energy to a three-state region. According to Modern Electric Water Company of Spokane, the lower Snake River dams produce about as much annual energy (1,000 average megawatts) as a large nuclear power plant.

“But they can produce up to three times that amount during periods of high demand. As many as 750,000 homes rely on the carbon-free power generated by the lower Snake River dams,” the company says. “During times of extreme need, the lower Snake River dams can power up to 2.25 million homes.”

Demand will only continue to grow in the Northwest as the Biden Administration’s electric vehicle and electric appliance mandates kick in, forcing more pressure on to a grid that depends on water and turbines.

“We have yet to see an independent engineering, and cost-benefit and fish-benefit analysis, but recent studies concluded that breaching the four lower Snake River dams would cost taxpayers between $10.3 billion and $77 billion,” the company says.

Similarly, the proposal by by the Eklutna tribe in Anchorage, whose membership is about 70, has not seen engineering studies that show that Anchorage will not be starved of power, as well as water. In 2018, Eklutna produced 177,438 megawatt hours of clean energy, enough energy to power more than 24,600 of the 115,028 housing units that are in Anchorage for an entire year.

Allowing the Eklutna to run free has a possibility of damaging critical water pipes that supply water to Anchorage residents and businesses.

The dismantling of the Eklutna Dam will eventually land on Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s desk.

In the Northwest, the dismantling or massive altering of the dams is supported by regional tribes, Gov. Jay Inslee of Washington, a Democrat, and Gov. Tina Kotek of Oregon, also a Democrat. The State of Idaho opposes the proposal.

While the dams have provided renewable energy that helps the economy of the Northwest, they came at a cost for migrating salmon. Now, the states’ economies hang in the balance, as the White House begins its push to dismantle the dams, something the DAMN Act is trying to stall until another administration is in power.

“The deal President Biden brokered with radical environmentalists behind closed doors will forever change the way our river system operates. It will devastate communities in Eastern Washington and across the Pacific Northwest, and it makes commitments on behalf of Congress without engaging with us,” said Rep. Rogers of Eastern Washington. “The administration understands only Congress has the authority to breach our dams. This legislation is how we use that power to make sure that never happens while protecting our region’s way of life from the consequences of this deeply misguided plan.”

The DAMN Act is supported by 10 stakeholders who represent large constituencies that would be directly affected by the removal and operational breaching of the Lower Snake River dams, including the Tri-City Development Council (TRIDEC), Public Power Council, Inland Power, Pacific Northwest Waterways Association, Northwest River Partners, National Association of Wheat Growers, Washington Association of Wheat Growers, Washington State Potato Commission, Washington State Dairy Federation, and the Columbia Basin Development League.

“The four lower Snake River dams are critically important to the economy of the Tri-Cities and the entire Pacific Northwest region. Their importance was underscored earlier this month when the Bonneville Power Administration reported record high electricity demand, which could not have been met without the power produced by these dams. Congressman Newhouse has always been a champion of the Snake River dams, and we sincerely thank him for his continued support,” said Karl Dye, president and CEO of TRIDEC.

The National Rural Electric Cooperative Association CEO Jim Matheson said the covert agreement between the Biden administration and hydropower plaintiffs threatens hydropower production and would compromise electric reliability and affordability for millions in the western United States .

The draft settlement of the agreement was made public by lawmakers on Nov. 29, a final environmental impact statement released by the federal government on July 31, 2020, said the preferred alternative was that the four Lower Snake River dams – Ice Harbor, Lower Monumental, Little Goose and Lower Granite – remain in place.

Supporting the DAMN Act are grower associations that provide food to the nation, including the National Grain and Feed Association, Washington Association of Wheat Growers, Washington State Potato Commission, and the Washington State Dairy Federation, whose CEO brought up another unintended consequence: “Breaching the Lower Snake River Dams will put tens of thousands of trucks on the highways and also crowd railway traffic. This will negatively impact feed and product transportation and dramatically reverse progress in reducing the carbon footprint of our state and nation.”

Dunleavy continues food security initiative with CROP Act, with loans and crop insurance

Gov. Mike Dunleavy on Friday introduced the “CROP Act,” (Capital access, Revenue protection, and Open Procurement Act” as he continues his work strengthening Alaska’s food security.

According to the American Farmland Trust, there are just 990 farms in Alaska, comprising 849,753 acres of land, less today than the 881,585 acres that were under cultivation in 2007. The market value of the farming products in Alaska annually is $3,531,000 in goods sold directly to retail markets, institutions, and food hubs for local or regionally branded products.

With a generally warming weather pattern, farming is becoming more viable in the north.

“Alaska’s reliance on importing so much of our food creates a vulnerability. While we can’t change the weather, we can change policy to optimize Alaska’s agricultural output,” Dunleavy said. “Farming has always come with risks that are outside of man’s control. However, the CROP Act will reduce financial risks and cultivate an economic environment where Alaska’s food producers can succeed and Alaska can be more self-reliant. Furthermore, the legislation will also keep a greater percentage of money spent on food circulating within Alaska rather than flowing to producers out of state.”

House Bill 296 and Senate Bill 211, will hopefully reduce risks and put some incentives into growing of food. Its main mechanism is simply adjusting existing Alaska statues.

“Governor Dunleavy’s CROP Act addresses financial policies that restrict some farmers from reaching their full potential to put more Alaska Grown food on Alaskans’ tables,” said DNR Commissioner John Boyle in a statement. “This legislation will provide better loan options for the agricultural industry, make critical crop insurance less risky, and ensure that State of Alaska purchasing power is invested back into Alaska.”

Earlier in the Dunleavy Administration, the governor pushed to open up more agricultural land outside of Nenana. The Legislature funded the first phase of the project, which opens up more than 100,000 acres for food farming. The Legislature funded the first phase of the project in its 2022 budget.

There are three major components of the CROP Act: Increasing access to and availability of agricultural loans, revising crop insurance premium subsidies, and stimulating state spending on Alaskan agricultural and fisheries products.

Agricultural Revolving Loan Fund Improvements

The bill amends the Agricultural Revolving Loan Fund by repealing outdated loan limits and allowing the Board of Agriculture and Conservation to set new limits in regulation. It expands the range of loans to include shipping costs and refinancing. The CROP Act would provide a $4 million capital injection into the fund – the first capital injection since 1986.

Crop Insurance Updates

The bill amends existing law requiring the state to provide premium support to farmers for crop insurance policies. The bill provides for a staggered level of support in which the State will pay the full farmers’ shares for revenue protection policies offered in Alaska for four years, and partial support in the following years provided farmers contribute to a minimum level of coverage.

Crop insurance premium support will incentivize increased planting and provide an asset that can be leveraged for farm improvements. With an increased in-state supply of feed grains, Alaska’s livestock producers can grow their herds with less risk, and meat processors will also benefit from increased production.

The bill provides an initial level of $4 million for premium support payments. That amount accounts for current acres in production and potential growth.

Revised Preference for Alaska Grown and Harvested Products

Dunleavy would repeal limits on state agencies’ purchases of Alaska grown or harvested products for five years.

Under current law, any entity receiving state funds, including state agencies, school districts, and municipalities, are required to purchase Alaska grown or harvested products so long as they are no more than 7-15% more expensive than a comparable product from outside of the state. In place of percentages, the bill will require eligible entities to purchase an available Alaskan agricultural or fisheries product if the product is of “like quality” compared to a product harvested out of state.

Alaska’s farmers often struggle to enter retail channels because of corporate requirements for regular and dependable deliveries to secure shelf space. By providing access to market through institutional buying power, Alaskan producers will have the ability to scale up with less risk and to reach a level of production that can meet the requirements of retail customers.

To mitigate potential increased costs due to mandatory purchase of Alaskan products, the bill contains three protective measures: a five-year sunset that reverts the amended provisions back to current law, a requirement that Alaskan producers submit accurate wholesale pricing lists in response to solicitations, and an annual reporting requirement to the Legislature.

Rep. Kevin McCabe: The pervasive sacrifice of truth in favor of an agenda

By REP. KEVIN MCCABE

Recent events in the Alaska Legislature and in Alaska have brought a new, yet pervasive, problem to light: People will do, or say, anything if it pushes their agenda forward.

It apparently does not matter if you are a teacher, an advocate for Right to Life in Alaska, a school district administrator, a reporter, or one of the many people who are taken in by these comments and pass them along without a thought to their veracity.

The first sacrificed truth is from a diatribe from Alaska Right to Life, attacking Speaker of the House Cathy Tilton for not removing some legislators who the group feels are not as “right-to-life” as they should be.

Alaska Right to Life attacking Speaker Cathy Tilton on social media.

Notwithstanding the sanctimonious hypocrisy of the missive they published, the truth is that it is just not possible without some dangerous repercussions.

Consider that the House Majority is not a binding caucus. Because of this, Speaker Tilton cannot remove a person from any committee by herself. She needs the support of at least 21 members of the House Majority Caucus to do so. So, the truth is that the only way to do what the Alaska Right to Life says they want her to accomplish is to disband the House Majority altogether.

Alaska Right to Life knows this, but is that what Alaskans really want? I am sure you don’t and I know I sure don’t. But I am left wondering about the true agenda of Alaska Right to Life: Why have they sacrificed the truth?

Next up we have watched very senior school administrators, district officials, and even some elected officials, sacrificing the truth for what they call “education funding.”

The truth is that a Base Student Allocation increase is not education funding.

The BSA goes to the school districts, not the teachers or classrooms in any appreciable amount. School districts have variable expenses, such as heat and energy, but how well are they being managed? That should be the question every parent who wants the truth should be asking.

The $1,413-per-student that school districts are demanding is derived from merely entering the last Base Student Allocation increase (from 2006) into an online “inflation calculator.” This amount has no basis in reality and the math is pretty nebulous. The truth is that $1,413 is far above what most school districts need (and they don’t want an audit or even to be transparent for some reason) and this amount is far above what we can afford. 

Among other misinformation, the assertion that we haven’t augmented “education funding” since 2006 is quite disheartening. 

You can see that, contrary to this sacrificed truth, the Legislature has allocated nearly $450 million dollars toward “education” since 2002. Additionally, the truth is there were hikes in education funding in 2017 and again last year. 

Also bear in mind the truth that a $1,413 increase in the Base Student Allocation will cost almost $400 million dollars. Where is the money going to come from?

The answer is one truth they do not want you to consider. The money will almost certainly come from your Permanent Fund dividend. There is no other pot of money to accomplish this funding. The truth is that even a $300 increase in the Base Student Allocation surpasses the total of all other increases combined. But that doesn’t fit the agenda, so you won’t be told that truth.

Next truth sacrificed is the idea that teachers do not want bonuses and that bonuses “don’t work.” The truth is that bonuses have consistently proven to be effective in incentivizing retention and hiring throughout the world. This holds true in the military, aviation industry, and virtually every other business or career field at one time or another. Many careers in the state right now, such as bus drivers, CDL and equipment operators, medical professionals, and others receive hiring and retention bonuses.

Why are the alphabet soup groups surrounding education telling everyone that teachers are an exception to this, and would not appreciate or benefit from bonuses?

Oh that’s right – they have an agenda so the truth does not matter.

Why would school districts, teachers’ unions and others sacrificing the truth about charter schools. Is their agenda to protect the neighborhood schools? Do they want to limit parental choice to use a charter school? Is their agenda only to meet enrollment quotas for additional state funding? Parents should ask if school districts are primarily a business, or are they an entity dedicated to delivering high-quality education?

The truth is that a school districts paramount concern should be empowering parents with the option to choose the best educational environment for their children. The truth is that our dialogue should not be about preserving district interests or sustaining neighborhood schools at all costs. It should be about the quality education of our most precious resource. 

Next on the chopping block of truth comes the idea that we are experiencing a huge “outmigration” of students. This is also false. Families are not leaving the state in droves.

Instead, the data shows that parent are making choices to homeschool or charter school their kids; school districts should ask themselves why.

As a closing thought, one should note that the Mat-Su School District, which has long committed to prioritizing students and effective teaching, has the lowest cost per student in the state, and the yet their student outcomes have experienced significant improvement in the last two years.

This truth can be attributed to the school board and district leadership’s unwavering dedication to education and placing emphasis on the students rather than money. Why don’t we hear about that truth?

Rep. Kevin McCabe is the House of Representatives member from Big Lake, House District 30 (formerly District 8.) He is a retired 747 captain and is retired from the U.S. Coast Guard.

Listicle: Candidates for Anchorage election

Anchorage voters have options this spring: The filing period for Anchorage municipal elections closed Friday night, and every school board incumbent who is running for reelection now has a competitor.

In addition, another mayoral candidate has filed: Phil Isley, who ran for school board in 2018 and was defeated by Deena Mitchell. In one race, to finish out the term of Chugiak-Eagle River Assembly member Kevin Cross, there is just one candidate: Mark Littlefield.

To drop from the ballot, candidates must file their intent to withdraw by Tuesday, Jan. 30. Ballots will be mailed out about March 13 and must be postmarked or returned to a drop box by April 2. Here’s the list of who is on the ballot, as of Friday at 5 pm:

Anchorage Mayoral Candidates

​​​Popp, Bill – Filed 1/12/2024

Tuck, Chris – Filed 1/12/2024

Colbry, Darin – Filed 1/12/2024

Craig, Breck – Filed 1/17/2024

Darden, Dustin Thomas House – Filed 1/12/2024, Updated 1/16/2024

Danger, Nick – Filed 1/12/2024

Di Grappa, Jenny – Filed 1/26/2024

LaFrance, Suzanne​ – Filed 1/19/2024

Bronson, Dave​ – Filed 1/23/2024, Corrected 1/25/2024 Incumbent

Isley, Phil – Filed 1/25/2024​

Anchorage Assembly – Seat A – District 2 – Candidates (1-year term)​

Littlefield, Mark H. – Filed 1/18/2024

Anchorage School Board Candidates

School Board – Seat E

Higgins, Pat​ – Filed 1/12/2024, Incumbent

Schuster, Kay – Filed 1/12/2024​

School Board – Seat F

Frank, Angela​ – Filed 1/23/2024

Wilson, Dora – Filed 1/12/2024 Incumbent

School Board – Seat G

​Pohland, Chelsea – Filed 1/26/2024

Jacobs, Carl – Filed 1/12/2024 Incumbent

Service Area Board of Supervisors

The following candidates will only appear on the ballots of those who live in the road service area.

Bear Valley LRSA – Seat C 

​Ennis, William – Filed 1/12/2024

Birch Tree/Elmore LRSA – Seat B

Sherman, Luke – Filed 1/25/2024

Chugiak Fire Service Area – Seat B

Girdwood Valley Service Area – Seat A

​​Wingard, Jennifer​ – Filed 1/24/2024

Girdwood Valley Service Area – Seat B

​​Burnett, Brian – Filed 1/26/2024

Wilbanks, Brett – Filed 1/17/2024

Glen Alps Service Area – Seat E

Connolly, Joseph – Filed 1/23/2024

Homestead LRSA – Seat C

​​Hoffman, Kristy – Filed 1/24/2024

Lakehill LRSA – Seat B
Mt. Park Estates LRSA – Seat A

​​Percy, Heather – Filed 1/26/2024

Mt. Park/Robin Hill RRSA – Seat A

Mt. Park/Robin Hill RRSA – Seat B

​​Bassler, Thomas​ – Filed 1/18/2024

Paradise Valley South LRSA – Seat C
Rabbit Creek View/Heights LRSA – Seat A

Lipps, David – Filed 1/26/2024

Raven Woods/Bubbling Brook LRSA – Seat A 
Rockhill LRSA – Seat A
Section 6/Campbell Airstrip Road LRSA – Seat B

Johnson, Eric​ – Filed 1/17/2024

Section 6/Campbell Airstrip Road LRSA – Seat C 

​Walker, Jack – Filed 1/16/2024

Sequoia Estates LRSA – Seat E
Skyranch Estates LRSA – Seat A

South Goldenview RRSA – Seat B

​​Culhane, Tim – Filed 1/16/2024

South Goldenview RRSA – Seat C

​​Lemon, Marty – Filed 1/16/2024

SRW Homeowners’ LRSA – Seat A

Talus West LRSA – Seat B

​Winsor, Anthony​ – Filed 1/26/2024

Totem LRSA – Seat C

Higgins, Patrice​ – Filed 1/24/2024

Giammalva, Pamela​ – Filed 1/25/2024

Upper Grover LRSA – Seat A

​​Cottrell, Jim​ – Filed 1/16/2024

Upper O’Malley LRSA – Seat B

Upper O’Malley LRSA –Seat E

Valli Vue Estates LRSA – Seat A

​​​Loeffl​er, Drew – Filed 1/26/2024

Valli Vue Estates LRSA – Seat D

​​Sallee, Diane​ – Filed 1/12/2024​

Villages Scenic Parkway LRSA – Seat C

​​

Newt Gingrich: This will be an historic campaign year

By NEWT GINGRICH | REAL CLEAR WIRE

We are now living through the longest general election campaign in history.

With President Donald Trump’s victories in Iowa and New Hampshire – and his massive lead for the Republican presidential nomination in national polls – the Republican nomination was decided on Jan. 23.

No one has ever tried to have a national conversation for 286 days before an election.

The only president to lose re-election and then come back and win was Grover Cleveland, who won in 1884, lost in 1888, and then won again in 1892. However, in that era campaigning was relatively short and episodic. There was no television, radio, or social media.

Now, we have a country with a high capacity for boredom (there is a reason virtually all the top-rated television shows are NFL football games, and that various fake reality shows can be found all over the place).

Furthermore, the news media is desperate to fill the air 24-hours-a-day, seven-days-a-week. The news producers, editors, and reporters were hoping for a long nomination fight to give them lots to cover. They are now in a state of shock – and even more desperate to find some news hook that will draw in viewers and readers.

There will be constant pressure to find something negative with which to attack and undermine the Trump campaign in particular – and Republicans in general.

In the short run, Congress will get more coverage than it normally would during primary season. However, most Americans do not follow congressional activities. While important, most debates on the floor of Congress are not terribly exciting.

A long campaign is also a significant challenge for the Biden administration. Joe Biden’s people would have loved to watch the Republicans tear each other apart for months (and catalogued every candidates’ opposition research on Trump).

In the ideal Biden world, all political coverage for the next six months would be negative – and about Republicans.

Instead, the 2024 political drama will be about President Trump dominating the landscape and leading a political movement unlike anything we have seen in modern times.

A vigorous series of Trump rallies will be an amazing contrast with the passiveness, slow, meager Biden campaign effort. You aren’t going to be seeing 20,000-plus excited Biden supporters relishing a 90-minute speech by their candidate. The rhythm and pattern of the two campaigns is going to be a case study in asymmetry.

The biggest advantage President Trump has is the ability to campaign in states where he can grow the party and strengthen candidates for governor, the U.S. Senate, and the U.S. House.

The second great advantage of being finished with the nomination campaign is Trump and his team will now have time to develop positive issues and themes throughout the country.

The American left and President Biden would like to make this election about the recent past – and especially Jan. 6. They want to create Trump into a fantasy demon who poses an existential threat to the survival of American freedom. (Note, as the left is actively trying to arrest and strike from ballots its political opponent, it is also claiming democracy will die if he wins the election.)

For their leftwing fanatic base, that image is real, powerful, and emotionally fulfilling. For the rest of the country, it is dwarfed by the realities of Biden’s practical failures on virtually every front – and the degree to which most of the country rejects the radical left’s values and actions.

President Trump and the Republicans have a simple model to follow that will create a trap in which to capture the Biden record. Essentially, it’s a sandwich.

For the bottom piece of bread, they can refer back to the achievements from Trump’s first term. As a former president, Trump is in a unique position to describe what he has done and what he will do. His administration grew the economy. It made America energy independent while lowering the price of gasoline, natural gas, and heating oil. The Trump administration kept inflation under control. It controlled the border. It supported law enforcement and fought crime. It stopped terrorism and exercised effective power in the world. It rebuilt and strengthening NATO and negotiated with foreign governments on trade and other issues with great effectiveness.

The middle of the sandwich contrasts Trump’s achievements with Biden’s failures. Virtually, every public opinion poll shows that most Americans think Trump’s past policies worked better for them than Biden’s current policies.

For the top slice of bread, Trump and Republicans can project forward and describe a future of extraordinary opportunities that will strengthen America. They can talk about increasing Americans’ standard of living, and stopping illegal immigration, drugs, and crime. They can describe a dramatically better education system. They can talk about a renewed and reformed military that can protect America, help our allies, and deter our opponents. They can outline breakthroughs in space, health outcomes, and artificial intelligence that will improve Americans’ lives.

Ideally, each layer would get roughly equal time and focus. Biden will be painfully trapped between Trump’s success in the past – and his promise of a better future.

With the nominating race over – and 286 days to campaign – no Republican has ever had the potential to grow such a startling majority. If Trump cheerfully contrasts his past success with Biden’s failure – and focuses on a positive future, he could attract people who have never talked with or joined Republicans.

This is going to be an extraordinary campaign.

For more commentary from Newt Gingrich, visit Gingrich360.com. Also, subscribe to the Newt’s World podcast.

This article was originally published by RealClearPolicy and made available via RealClearWire.

Georgia Senate passes bill to ban ranked-choice voting

By T.A. DeFEO

The Georgia Senate passed a bill Friday to bar ranked-choice voting in the state. The chamber passed Senate Bill 355 by a 31-19 margin.

“We must aggressively fend off any attempts of anyone attempting to hijack our election software while also combating those who attempt to reduce voter turnout or confuse our citizens with overcomplicated processes under the guise of saving money,” state Sen. Randy Robertson, R-Cataula, said during Friday’s debate. “One such idea that has crawled out of the tar pits from yesterday is rank choice voting or RCV.”

Robertson said rank choice voting has been around since the early 1900s. While the approach disappeared, “some politicians who did not like runoffs” reintroduced the process, the lawmaker added.

During Friday’s debate, state Sen. Elena Parent, D-Atlanta, said moving to ranked-choice voting, could help save the cost of runoffs. The 2020 U.S. Senate runoff cost $75 million, Parent said.

“I view SB 355 as the latest part of the disinformation campaign about elections and, therefore, another effort to undermine faith and democratic principles and systems,” Parent said.

“Before we pass any legislation, we should ask ourselves, what is the purpose of the policy under consideration?” Parent asked. “One key question might be, does this policy banning rank-choice voting support good governance? A follow-on to that is, is there an actual problem to be solved by the legislation or an issue to be addressed? Here with SB 355, the answer is a clear ‘no,’ because ranked-choice voting, also known as instant runoff voting, isn’t legal anywhere in Georgia today.”

Parent noted that Georgians serving in the military overseas vote via ranked choice.

The state Senate also passed Senate Bill 358 by a 30-19 margin. It clarifies that the State Election Board can investigate the secretary of state, an office currently occupied by Republican Brad Raffensperger.

“In order to have free and fair elections, Georgians must have the utmost trust in their state’s elections systems,” Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, a Republican, said in a statement. “Senate Bills 355 and 358 strengthen our elections process by dispelling ambiguity and increasing public trust with Georgia’s voters.”

Raffensperger’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

Mark Littlefield: I’d be honored to represent Chugiak-Eagle River on the Assembly

By MARK LITTLEFIELD

I am running for the Anchorage Assembly, District 2 to represent the people of Chugiak-Eagle River. As a 40+ year resident of Eagle River, an Air Force veteran, husband, father, and community oriented conservative, I believe I have the necessary experience and values to represent our community on the Assembly.

This is a unique election for our community. Should I be elected, I would serve a one-year term, to fill out the remainder of Assembly Member Kevin Cross’ current term. Next April, another election will occur in which our community will elect an Assembly Member for a full three-year term.

I have stepped into this race, and out of retirement, because I believe our community needs an honest, hardworking, and community minded conservative, who shares the values of Chugiak-Eagle River residents, on the Assembly. Our voices need to be heard and our values need to be defended.

We are fortunate that Member Cross timed his resignation to allow the people of Chugiak-Eagle River to choose our next representative on the Assembly. We do not need 10 Anchorage Assembly members deciding who is the best fit for our community.

Now for a little bit about me: I grew up in Salt Lake City, Utah and met my wife, of now 44 years, in high school. After high school, I enlisted in the Air Force and was stationed in Alaska in 1982. We’ve been here ever since. We found our dream home in Eagle River. We raised our children here, created lifelong friendships, and enjoyed successful careers. We have deep roots in this community and aren’t going anywhere.

In 1995 I retired from active duty, and spent the last 28 years serving our community through various roles with the Municipality of Anchorage. I retired last May from the Muni, after serving for 13 years as Superintendent of Road Maintenance for the Chugiak, Birchwood, Eagle River Rural Road Service Area. In that role I managed road renovations, oversaw the contract workforce that handles snow plowing, and supported the community during natural disasters such as landslides, the 2018 earthquake, and the 2022 Hiland Valley avalanche. I am no stranger to how our local government works, and would be honored to lend this expertise to our community through the Assembly.

Outside of work, I have given back to our community through time on the Eagle River Parks and Recreation Board of Supervisors, as the alternate to the Eagle River Valley Community Council and was recently appointed the mayor’s seat at that council. I also previously served on the Eagle Crossing HOA Board of Supervisors. My wife and I remain active in our local parish, St. Andrew Catholic Church, and enjoy spending time outdoors with our family.

Thinking about the issues our city faces, there is a clear need for strong leadership, backed by a humble heart for service. It will be my mission to listen first, evaluate second, and then act in the best interest of our families, community, and future.

Elected officials and public employees must be exemplary stewards of the taxes paid by our community. We need accountability, transparency, and fiscal responsibility when it comes to spending the hardworking dollars of our friends and neighbors.

Though Assembly races are technically non-partisan, I am not ashamed to let folks know that I am a conservative and registered Republican. Like many residents in Chugiak-Eagle River, I’m a firm believer that we need to find ways to reduce spending, lower property taxes, and ensure our community receives the level of services commensurate with our population size and amount of taxes we pay.

I am pro-public safety and will fight to ensure our police force and firefighters have the tools and resources they need to keep us safe.

We need a pro-business and limited government approach to growing our economy again. Micromanaging business and stifling innovation with red tape will not help Anchorage thrive.

Over the next few months I look forward to connecting with you and answering your questions about our city’s future. It would be my honor to earn your trust and vote.

You can find out more about me and stay up to date with the campaign by visiting our website at this link.

Mark Littlefield is the only candidate who filed to fill out the remaining portion of Assemblyman Kevin Cross’ term.

Linda Boyle: Should U.S. surrender its sovereignty?

By LINDA BOYLE

The global elitists finished their annual World Economic Forum event in Davos last week. More than 60 heads of state and governments, along with some top political and business leaders, attended. Also at the World Economic Forum, the World Health Organization met to discuss global pandemics.  

Former Vice President Al Gore, author of “An Inconvenient Truth,” discussed the need to get rid of natural gas, coal, and all other fossil fuels to save the planet. He then flew back home to get to work on the reelection campaign for President Joe Biden.

Our U.S. representative to the World Health Organization panel was the only participant wearing a mask. That should give you a clue as to what to expect with the next pandemic. 

Most frightening is what the WHO wants to do to prepare for this new “Disease X”.  Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the World Health Organization, believes we need to plan for the next pandemic. 

And WHO has developed a plan that is scheduled for ratification on May 24. This plan would give incredible powers to the WHO if approved by the U.S. This plan would surrender our sovereignty to a UN organization. The plan, as now envisioned, could:

  • – Shut down our economy with no end in sight.
  • – Mandate lockdowns in America.
  • – Mandate face masks.
  • – Shut down our supply chains to severely impact our economy.

Bear in mind, the WHO officials have no accountability for their actions and all who work there have diplomatic immunity. Basically, there is no one to charge for any crimes the WHO may commit. Add to this, the WHO is the only “sub-agency of the UN with its own constitution.  It’s allowed to make treaties with other countries. 

This plan would require every country to sign away its sovereignty for the good of the world community and of public health.

Remember what our own Centers for Disease Control, National Institutes of Health, White House executive orders, and healthcare community did to us with Covid-19? This could be even more far reaching. 

The following chart shows the approval process for both the International Health Regulation Amendments and the Pandemic Treaty. Note that the IHR is an opt-out process so if no action is taken by a country, that country is automatically opted in. On the other hand, the Pandemic Treaty is an opt-in process; once a nation signs up to the treaty, there is at least a 3-year effort needed to get out.

What does this plan contain? The plan is all inclusive. It dips into taking complete control of global health as its first step. 

Because the plan is not specific to disease, it could be applied to anything else the WHO thinks is important to control, like climate, our food, ecosystems, supply chains, and more.

This overreaching idea would agree with the new “One Health” concept being preached worldwide and approved by our CDC.  

The One Health concept is that humans, animals, and the environment are closely interrelated. They are equal to each other and are intertwined.  

Therefore, if the pandemic treaty and the IHR are ratified, it could become a slippery slope to control agriculture, the environment, and climate in future renditions.  

For now, it is only about health. WHO’s director would have the power to give binding orders to all countries worldwide. He would be able to mandate a vaccine passport, tell you what medicines you can and cannot take. 

So much for U.S. sovereignty. We would lose it to this New World Order.  Dr. Meryl Nass of Children’s Health Defense states the following:  

“Basically, One Health gives public health officials total control and surveillance across AI, the internet, agriculture, climate change, public health, medical systems, ecological sites, urban and rural areas. It can encompass just about anything. It also values animal and plant life as equal to human life.”

Our own Biden White House piled on with its statement on biological threats and other health threats:  

Former President Donald Trump opted the U.S. out of the WHO and quit funding the organization. However, on his first day in office, President Biden used an executive order to reenlist America into the WHO.

There are many threats in the world today. We have military conflicts and illegal immigrants streaming across our southern border.  

But the greatest threat to America’s sovereignty may come from a piece of paper which is legally binding: the IHR and Pandemic Treaty.  

Covid isn’t over. Government control isn’t over. Pay attention.

Linda Boyle, RN, MSN, DM, was formerly the chief nurse for the 3rd Medical Group, JBER, and was the interim director of the Alaska VA. Most recently, she served as Director for Central Alabama VA Healthcare System. She is the director of the Alaska Covid Alliance.