Saturday, August 2, 2025
Home Blog Page 1130

Please don’t send in the counselors and the hot cocoa

CONSERVATIVES ARE DOING JUST FINE

By SUZANNE DOWNING

Four years ago, public schools and universities offered counseling for students traumatized by the Trump win.

Parents dropping their students off at urban schools around the country from San Francisco to Boston reported that teachers were weeping uncontrollably, and students were having anxiety attacks. Counselors were advising non-white students that they should fear the new Trump Administration.

Cornell University hosted a “cry-in,” with hot cocoa and tissues on hand. 

Yale University held a “primal scream” event to allow traumatized students to vent, and the University of Pennsylvania featured a puppy and kitten therapy session, so students could snuggle their grief away.

University of Michigan Law School scheduled a “Post-Election Self-Care With Food and Play” with crayons, Play-Doh, and bubbles. The event was cancelled after publicity led to public ridicule of the school, led by conservatives on Twitter.

University of Michigan-Flint created “safe spaces” for students to receive counseling. Many schools and nonprofits just called it a day off for mourning.

And the riots. Oh, so many riots. At universities across the country, the protesters chanted: “F‑‑‑ Donald Trump!” with fists pumping in the air. Many were “peaceful but fiery.”

It seems like just yesterday, but it was Nov. 9, 2016 when large riots broke out in various parts of the country, and protests followed in Canada, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Philippines, Australia, and even Israel. The riots continued for four years, radicalizing a generation as the Democratic Party became more informed by its radical wing. Pussy hats, “believe all women,” Black Lives Matter, Antifa, and Wall of Moms capped off the collective tantrum by rioting every night in the summer and fall of 2020, a curiosity that has been all-but ignored by the media.

Even on Election Night, protesters swarmed through Washington, D.C., which was, by then, largely boarded up against the expected violence. Urban America looks like a war zone even today.

Across America, there are 70 million Trump voters who are not rioting, even though many of them feel the election was not only stolen, but that free and fair elections may be gone forever, due to the anything-goes voting procedures now being accepted across the states. Most Trump voters think ballots appeared as needed in several states.

But the Trump voters are going to work, taking care of their families, and hoping for the best for their nation. They understand that their candidate was flawed and yet, was a fighter for them and all Americans who believe in the Constitution.

Trump voters also see this as an opportunity to retake the House of Representatives in two years, as Joe Biden and Kamala Harris inevitably bow and curtsey to the radical Left, which doesn’t represent mainstream values of most Americans.

The results of the 2020 election are still inconclusive at this writing, and the chain of events that is leading to a probable Biden presidency is deeply unsatisfying.

But what we’re not likely to see are Republicans rocking in the corner with a coloring book and a cup of hot cocoa, a pack of tissues at the ready for the next uncontrollable ugly cry. 

They’re busy keeping America great, with or without their chosen president. They’re busy reloading for 2022.

Educator is person being charged with destroying Don Young signs

15

Charges are pending against Helen Desinger, 68, of Anchorage, who is believed to be behind the destruction of Congressman Don Young campaign signs that were on private property at the corner of Tudor Road and Old Seward Highway.

The incident, which occurred on Oct. 28, is classified as a misdemeanor. Desinger is believed to be the one caught because a security camera recorded the license plate of a vehicle registered to her.

The Alaska Court system has now entered the matter into the court system records online, with a court date of Dec. 29, but the specific charges are not yet noted. Criminal mischief may be the ultimate charge; the value of the signs is probably under $500, depending on the level of destruction and whether the wood was salvageable.

Desinger, who lives in District 28, South Anchorage – Rabbit Creek, has a clean criminal record with not much more than a speeding ticket before this incident. She is a (edited here) retired educator who worked for the nonprofit, South East Regional Resource Center.

Art Chance: You say you want a revolution

52

By ART CHANCE

You say you want a revolution. You’re watching one. Our forefathers would have been shooting already, but for the most part we’ve just lined up like sheep for the slaughterhouse.

A friend of mine jokingly asked, “can we use Alaska Airlines miles to get an upgrade to a better re-education camp?”

The Democrat Party and the bureaucratic state, both arms of the same entity, have used the COVID-19 scam-demic to deprive us of our lives, livelihood, liberty, and property.  

In those parts of the country under Democrat control, the citizenry has essentially been incarcerated. The whole purpose was to force uncontrolled mail ballot voting in the General Election.

The Democrat-controlled media has constantly conflated mail ballots with absentee ballots. Some states, Alaska among  them, are too liberal with absentee voting; you really should have a legitimate reason for not being able to be at your polling place in order to vote absentee. 

Disability and military service are obvious reasons. I don’t mind an early “in person” early vote for someone who will not be in the district on Election Day, but it should require an appearance before an election official, ID, and a sworn statement that you won’t be in the district.

The mail balloting being used in the Democrat states is just the uncontrolled mailing of ballots to everyone on the voter rolls to the address at which they are registered.   

In all states “motor voter” requirements cause anyone who has any contact with government to become a registered voter; Alaska has thousands of registered voters whose only contact with the State is showing up in the spring, signing up for unemployment insurance and welfare, and along the way becoming registered to vote.

 They leave when their Alaska adventure doesn’t materialize or at the end of the summer, but they remain on the voter rolls for a decade or more.

The geniuses who supported Permanent Fund dividend registration only made it worse. Everybody and his dog applies for a PFD and is automatically registered to vote. 

Flash: the Permanent Fund Division of the Department of Revenue, the people who administer the dividend program, have almost no verification or fraud detection capability.   

Instead, the division relies on fraudsters doing or saying something stupid and getting ratted out. Then, the division and the Department of Law make a lot of smoke and noise prosecuting the stupid ones that get caught and try to scare others off. That is the fraud prevention program of the PFD folks, and also the voter registration folks.

I learned about Get Out the Vote operations from a master, the late Matt Reese, the man who stole the presidency for John F. Kennedy. It is only one small step from Get Out The Vote to voter fraud. If you’re doing legitimate GOTV, you use your phone bank to make sure all of your voters have actually voted and to motivate them to vote by offering incentives from just a ride to “walking around money,” which isn’t legal but is very common.   

The next step is once you have identified the voters on your list who haven’t voted, or who don’t exist in the district anymore,  you can vote for them. In the old days, this was almost entirely a blue city phenomenon, because you had to have the cooperation or at least acquiescence of law enforcement. 

Once you had a list of your voters who didn’t exist anymore or who had resisted your attempts to get them to vote, you just saddled up the van at the union hall or the Black church, gave your voters a name, and dropped them off at the polling place to vote.   

This is why the Democrats have always so strenuously resisted voter ID.   Those were the “good old days” when you had to be pretty organized and good at what you did to commit voter fraud.

Fast forward to today’s world of computers, high quality, cheap printers, and mail ballots. In liberal or stupid jurisdictions, the government has allowed early voting and gives anyone who asks for the list of all those who’ve voted. Your campaign can mass mail ballots to every registered voter. You put a crew out to harvest any undelivered or undeliverable ballots. 

In some places you can get a lot of cooperation from unionized Postal Service workers in securing these ballots. Before long, you have a stack of ballots that no voter has used.

 If you have a decent computer guy, you can make all the fake ballots you need as well. I think the current internet rumors of watermarked “canary” ballots is just a PsyOps operation; the Department of Homeland Security isn’t really capable of doing that.

In my working days I used canary documents to run down leaks, but I was looking at groups of at most 15 or 20, and it was tough then. To do it on a national scale takes more resources, skill, and security than the federal government has these days.

Next, you put the phone bank back to work, just like in the old days, to see who is real and who has already voted. Once you have a list of those who aren’t real voters and those who haven’t or aren’t likely to vote, you just cast mail-in ballots for them or in the states that allow third-party delivery of ballots, just send the paid college punk to go deliver the ballots to the election office.

So, that is enough of Voter Fraud 101. I’m not a pro, but a bit above a rank amateur.  

Here is a way forward. The Republicans should have been in court months ago stopping governors and judges from changing election laws. One day, Republicans will learn that there is no legal requirement to be nice.

The only move left on the board is to force the question to the Supreme Court. The Democrats have been committing fraud for generations, and they’re generally quite good at it. Now and then, they get too arrogant and do something stupid, so the Republicans should be mindful of those.  

The recounts will be meaningless; the Democrats will have separated the mailing envelopes from the ballots so there will be no verifiable chain of custody and no way to attach any particular ballot to a name or address; they’re evil but not stupid. There will be no way to put the toothpaste back in the tube in the contested states.

The United States Supreme Court has never ordered a state to re-run an election and isn’t likely to today. So in the face of overwhelming evidence of voter fraud, what does the Court do?   

Well, they could just refuse the case, which means probably the Trump appointee and even Bush appointees on the Court face impeachment, a packed court, or both.

More likely, smart minds prevail. The Court concludes that there is not reasonable remedy in the states where fraud has been demonstrated.   Consequently, those states will not be allowed to cast votes in the Electoral College, the result of which is that neither Trump nor Biden have an EC majority. Absent an Electoral College majority, the election goes to the House of Representatives.

If the election goes to the House of Representatives, each state has one vote.   The Republicans currently have a majority in 27 states, but the math isn’t that simple. There is nothing that binds any Representative to his party or his/her state’s choice. There are many states that have Republican delegations but which have Democrat legislatures, governors, or Attorneys General and Secretaries of State.  

If you think faithless electors in the Electoral College are an issue, wait until the electors are members of the House.

We are destined to live in interesting times.

Art Chance is a retired Director of Labor Relations for the State of Alaska, formerly of Juneau and now living in Anchorage. He is the author of the book, “Red on Blue, Establishing a Republican Governance,” available at Amazon.

Mingle and Market

0

The Christmas Mingle and Market kicks off the holidays at the Palmer Train Depot Friday and Saturday, with vendors who are encouraging people to shake off the election season, embrace the holidays, and shop local this year. Details here.

How could the ‘bellwether counties’ get it so wrong?

27

Several counties in America are considered the “bellwethers,” the ones that nearly always vote for the eventual winner of the presidential race. And by “nearly always,” we mean it’s remarkable how accurate they are throughout history.

This year, the bellwether counties voted heavily for Donald Trump, and for many of them, it appears they have broken their near-perfect records of predicting the winner, if the current trends hold and Biden is elected president.

Valencia County, New Mexico – perfect record with the electoral college winner since 1952 (longest current perfect streak). 2020: Trump 54%, Biden 44.%

Vigo County, Indiana (county seat: Terre Haute) – has had 2 misses (1908, 1952) from 1888 on, and a perfect record since 1956. From 1960 to 2004, Vigo County has been within 3 percent of the national presidential vote every election. 2020: Trump – 56.20%, Biden – 41.45%

Westmoreland County, Virginia (county seat: Montross) – two misses since 1928 (in 1948 and 1960), perfect since 1964. 2020: Not posted.

Ottawa County, Ohio (county seat: Port Clinton) – one miss since 1948 (in 1960), perfect since 1964. 2020: Trump – 60.8%, Biden – 37.7%.

Wood County, Ohio (county seat: Bowling Green) – one miss since 1964 (in 1976), perfect since 1980. 2020: Trump – 52.86%, Biden – 45.24%

Kent County, Delaware – two misses since 1928 (in 1948 and in 1992). 2020: Not posted.

Coös County, New Hampshire (county seat: Lancaster) – two misses since 1892 (in 1968 and 2004) 2020: Trump – 52.2, Biden – 46.2%.

Essex County, Vermont – one miss since 1964 (in 1976), perfect since 1980. 2020: Trump – 57.10%, Biden – 37.91%.

Juneau County, Wisconsin – one miss since 1952 (in 1960), perfect since 1964. 2020: Trump – 8,749, Biden – 4,747.

Sawyer County, Wisconsin – one miss since 1952 (in 1960), perfect since 1964. 2020: Trump – 5,883, Biden – 4,494.

Sargent County, North Dakota (county seat: Forman) – one miss since 1948 (in 1988). 2020: Trump – 59.96%, Biden – 35.05%

Blaine County, Montana (county seat: Chinook) – one miss since 1916 (in 1988). 2020: Biden – 51%, Trump – 47%

Clallam County, Washington – two misses (1968, 1976) since 1920. 2020: Biden – 51.87%, Trump – 45.78%.

Stanislaus County, California (county seat Modesto) – one miss since 1972 (in 2016). 2020: Biden – 52.81%, Trump – 45.21%.

Ventura County, California – two misses since 1920 (in 1976 and 2016). 2020: Biden – 60.32%, Trump – 37.78%.

Merced County, California (county seat Merced) – one miss since 1972 (in 2016). 2020: Biden – 55.20%, Trump – 42.30%.

Hidalgo County, New Mexico (county seat: Lordsburg) – one miss since 1928 (in 1968), perfect since 1972. 2020: Trump – 56.7%, Biden – 41.7%.

Bexar County, Texas (county seat: San Antonio) – two misses since 1932 (in 1968 and 2016). 2020: Biden – 127,507, Trump – 89,991.

Val Verde County, Texas – two misses since 1924 (in 1968 and 2016). 2020: Trump – 7839, Biden – 6401

Hillsborough County, Florida (county seat: Tampa) – two misses since 1928 (in 1992 and 2016). 2020: Biden – 52.69%, Trump – 45.87%

Calhoun County, South Carolina – one miss since 1972 (in 1980), perfect since 1984. 2020: Trump – 4,302, Biden – 3903.

Colleton County, South Carolina – one miss since 1968 (in 1980), perfect since 1984. 2020: Trump – 54.12%, Biden – 45.20%.

Washington County, Maine – one miss since 1972 (in 1976), perfect since 1980. 2020: Trump – 59.1%, Biden – 38.5.

While these are the top bellwether counties, there are many more that are considered to be predictive. The entire list is found at Wikipedia.

No special election for acting mayor of Anchorage

12

Acting Mayor Austin Quinn-Davidson will remain Anchorage’s chief executive for eight months.

With just three votes in favor of a special election to serve out the term of the shortened term of Mayor Ethan Berkowitz, the Assembly chose to skip the special election and just move on, and allow Quinn-Davidson to serve over 20 percent of Berkowitz’ elected term. Berkowitz resigned after revelations came to light over his relationship with a reporter.

A regular election for mayor will be held April 6, but the successful candidate will not take office until July 1.

Assembly members Jamie Allard, Crystal Kennedy and John Weddleton voted in favor of a special election. The six others on the Assembly voted it down: Suzanne LaFrance, Chris Constant, Meg Zalatel, Kameron Perez-Verdia, Forrest Dunbar and Pete Peterson. Quinn-Davidson, who represents West Anchorage on the Assembly, did not vote, as she is acting mayor.

The municipal charter is clear that a special election must be held, and Assembly member Jamie Allard read aloud the relevant section of the charter that illustrates that point. She contends it is a violation of the charter to not hold a special election.

“I don’t believe that the charter actually gives the Assembly an option,” said Assembly member Kennedy during the Wednesday meeting. “But it’s actually much more specific than it’s made out to be.”

The subjectivity being used by the Assembly to decide to not hold an election isn’t supported anywhere in the charter, Kennedy said.

“There is nothing in the charter says it depends on the mood of the voter or the cost, she said. “Actually we’ve made the process of elections so simple, we practically hand carry the ballot to the voter. That’s one advantage of this mail in ballot. The right to vote is so fundamental and the role of mayor is the highest office in our local government, so we need to respect it as such, we shouldn’t be taking this so lightly.”

Lawyered up: Trump, Biden raising money for legal fight

4

By SCOTT LEVESQUE

Joe Biden is raising money for a likely legal fight from President Donald Trump over election results in several states.

The website entitled Biden Fight Fund allocates the donations: $142,000/$60,000 to the Democratic National Committee, $2,800/$5,000 to the Biden for President Recount Account, and any additional contributions go to the DNC.

There are actually two Biden Fight Funds – one run by ActBlue, the Democrats’ monster fundraising machine, and the other by NPG Van, a big data service company that interfaces with the Democratic National Committee.

Potential donors are greeted with the following message:

“Your donation right now is absolutely critical to electing Joe, Kamala, and Democrats across the country, and we’re counting on a surge of donations to fund all that we need to accomplish.”

But the fine print says funds go to various accounts besides the legal fund.

In the past 48 hours, Biden’s official Twitter account has tweeted out a link to the ActBlue Biden Fight Fund four times.

At the same time, President Trump’s team has been pushing legal fight donations through the Republican portal: WinRed.com, as legal challenges over vote counting have been mounted by the Trump campaign in five states.

His fund allocates donations, matched 1,000-to-1, to retire campaign debt and for the legal battle now underway, all spelled out in the fine print.

Fraud alert: Election system needs greater protection against corruption

30

By CRAIG E CAMPBELL

Do you think the election process in America is corrupt?  The process unfolding in Nevada, Michigan, Pennsylvania and other states is confirming, on a minute by minute basis, that voter integrity is not being protected and voter manipulation is happening.  

How can you trust an election outcome if you doubt the legitimacy of the process?  

  • A box of mail, which included three trays of absentee ballots, was dumped into a ditch in Wisconsin.    
  • Military ballots from Luzerne County, Pennsylvania were found discarded.
  • Poll watchers in Philadelphia, who had validated Watcher Certificates from the Philadelphia County Board of Election, were denied entry into a polling place.
  • People illegally handed out campaign brochures to voters while waiting in line to vote at the Olney Recreation Center in Philadelphia.
  • Mail-in ballots received after election day with no postage date are counted. No way to verify that the ballot was completed on or before the election. Is the United States Postal Service complicate in voter fraud?  Is the Division of Elections allowing post-election ballots to be counted to skew the results a certain way?

Voter integrity is a cornerstone of democracy. Without it, our election process is subject to fraud and abuse, resulting in a lack of confidence that those elected were, in fact, the choice of the people. Voter integrity requires five fundamental absolutes. 

The first and foremost is to ensure that every American has the right to vote. 

The second is validation that the voter voting is the registered voter and not someone else.

The third is a requirement that every voter be allowed to vote without any undue interference or external influence.

The forth is that each vote is actually counted, as was cast by the voter.  Not changed, discarded, or disallowed.

The fifth is transparency, to ensure that every vote is counted as was marked by the voter.  

As President Ronald Reagan once said about working with the Soviets, “Trust but verify.”  So it is with politics. Observing the ballot counting process protects the integrity of the system.  It has been a traditional method of voter verification for decades.  

I am appalled by the actions taken by some election officials in this election to potentially manipulate the outcome. Allowing a vote counting process to be conducted by denying poll watchers their legal ability to observe the vote counting process creates the perception that unlawful activities are permissible.   

I am equally offended by election officials that have permitted ballots counted that were not signed, could not be verified that the vote cast was actually completed by the registered voter, counted people who no longer lived in that district or state, had died, or it could not be confirmed that the ballot was cast on or prior to election day.

It should not be this way. Voter registrations can be verified and purged of individuals no longer eligible to vote in a specific location.  Elections can be conducted with full transparency and accountability, where all participants can agree on the end result, win or loss.  I speak with scar tissues from past elections.  

While serving as Alaska’s lieutenant governor, I had the honor (or rather the responsibility) to oversee our states election process during a very contentious election cycle. As you may recall, that year Joe Miller ran against Senator Lisa Murkowski in the Republican primary. Joe Miller won the primary. Senator Murkowski subsequently filed to run in the general election as a write-in candidate.  

In the 2010 General Election, Miller garnered 35% of the vote; however, 40% of the total votes were write-ins that were not counted until after election day.  To finalize the general election vote count, a hand count was conducted in Juneau. Both Miller and Murkowski were allowed to have poll watchers at the site during the count. 

In fact, poll watchers from both sides were able to look directly over the shoulder of any person counting votes to verify the vote. They were able to challenge the marking or spelling of each and every ballot cast. At the end, I affirmed that Murkowski prevailed.  Miller sued the State and lost in court. He conceded in December.

Compare that to today, where in Philadelphia poll watchers were restricted from being in close proximity of the people actually counting the vote. How can you verify the marking if restricted from being close? How can you verify the legitimacy of the ballot? This restriction on an open process only leads one to conclude there must be some nefarious actions being taken to manipulate the voting outcome. 

Maybe I’m wrong, but their actions certainly don’t convince me I am.

Objective voter verification is an absolute requirement if we want to convince the public that elections are fair. I would submit that verification by government officials alone is not convincing. Verification needs to be done by all affected parties, which means candidate representatives that have been identified as certified poll watchers. This does not create an unfair election process.  Rather, it confirms the fairness of the system, process, and outcome.

I have some recommendations for changes in Alaska:

  1. The Legislature should enact a law mandating that all ballots must be received by midnight on Election Day to be counted. None of this one week later stuff to count absentee and mail-in votes.  
  2. We must reinstate the requirement for witness signing of all mail-in and absentee ballots. To hell with a stupid court ruling. They are wrong when it comes to maintaining voting system with integrity. When you vote in person, verification that the person voting is the same person registered to vote is required. 
  3. Prohibit ballot harvesting from any third party. This idea that someone can go around and collect ballots is ludicrous. It allows for gross voter manipulation by opening the door that the person collecting the ballots could also be influencing the voter or worse, marking the ballot for them.
  4. Increase penalties for campaigning at polling places. 
  5. The State Division of Elections must pursue an aggressive voter registration verification process to remove from the voter registration list prior to every election those who have moved out of state; those who have moved between districts; those who have died; and those who are no longer eligible to vote.

Fair elections are crucial to the survival of a healthy democracy.  Our democratic republic is based on the principle of “one person, one vote.”  That means a legal and legitimate vote by each of us eligible to vote, not multiple votes by individuals; not votes cast by someone other than the actual voter; not votes cast based upon undue influence to a voter at the time the vote is cast; and it certainly means having all votes counted, not lost in ditches, misplaced, or discarded. 

If this election has taught us one thing, it is that our election system needs a major overhaul. Without it, we will only see more corrupt voting shenanigans by corrupt people, organizations, and governments who have contempt for the American people, and intend to continue manipulating elections to deprive us all of our constitutional rights for fair and honest elections.  

Why?  Because to them the ends justify the means.

Craig E. Campbell served on the Anchorage Assembly between 1986 and 1995 and later as Alaska’s Tenth Lieutenant Governor.  He was the previous Chief Executive Officer and President for Alaska Aerospace Corporation.  He retired from the Alaska National Guard as Lieutenant General (AKNG) and holds the concurrent retired Federal rank of Major General (USAF).

Dirty tricks: Municipality neuters recall application, says petition sponsors can’t hire signature gatherers?

BUT MUNI ATTORNEY THROWS OUT RECALL AGAINST ZALATEL

The applications for recall petitions for two sitting Assembly members have been answered by the municipal attorney and clerk of Anchorage, and the answer is mystifying to the petitioners.

Municipal Attorney Kate Vogel rewrote the application for the petition to recall Assembly Chair Felix Rivera. She removed language relating to misconduct in office and only allowed the petition application to say that Rivera had failed to perform his duties when he violated the mayor’s emergency orders against the number of people allowed inside the Assembly Chambers.

Vogel simply threw out the application for a petition to recall Assembly member Meg Zalatel.

Then the Municipal Clerk went further. She told the sponsors of the application that they may not hire a signature gatherer to collect the signatures needed to put Rivera on a ballot for recall. Instead, the Clerk stated that the petitioners would have to gather the signatures themselves.

Municipal Attorney Vogel’s response to the petitioners was to neuter the language of their complaint against Rivera, deny them the right to recall Zalatel.

“Recall Application 2020-04 only partially satisfies the statutory requirements for legal sufficiency. We recommend that Application 2020-04 be granted in part and denied in part, and a petition prepared only as to the allegation regarding “failure to perform prescribed duties,” Vogel wrote.

The original language of the petition was:

“Assembly chair Felix Rivera committed misconduct in office on August 11, 2020 by violating EO-15, an emergency order intended to protect the health and safety of Anchorage citizens, issued by the Mayor of Anchorage pursuant to AMC 3.80.060(H) by: 1) knowingly participating in an indoor gathering of more than 15 people (a meeting of the Anchorage Assembly) and 2) continuing to participate in an indoor gathering of more than 15 people at a meeting of the Anchorage Assembly after being specifically informed of the violation. Assembly chair Rivera failed to perform prescribed duties as chair of the Assembly by allowing the August 11 meeting he was presiding over to continue in violation of EO- 15 after the violation was brought to his attention by a point of order. Of all citizens in Anchorage the chair of the Anchorage Assembly should have been scrupulous in obeying the gathering limitation established by paragraph 4 of EO-15. His failure to do so needlessly endangered the lives of Anchorage citizens, encouraged the spread of COVID-19 throughout the community, and merits recall from office.”

She further noted that “…assembly meetings during [Emergency Order 15] EO-15 were closed to the public and had far fewer people in attendance than normal. The allegations do not explain why the applicants believe that participating in a too-large gathering and violating the emergency order constitutes ‘misconduct in office.'”

Vogel added, “Even ‘liberally construing’ the statutory language as the Alaska Supreme Court instructs, we do not see that the alleged conduct of merely ‘participating’ in a meeting with a number of persons exceeding what is allowed by law, constitutes ‘misconduct in office’ for the purposes of legal sufficiency of a recall application. We conclude that participating in a public meeting that allegedly violated the gathering restrictions of Emergency Order 15, without more, does not constitute the type of corrupt or abusive behavior that the Legislature encapsulated under ‘misconduct in office.'”

She continued, “For these reasons, we recommend denying as legally insufficient the portion of Application 2020-04 that seeks to recall Chair Rivera for misconduct in office.”

Instead, Vogel rewrote the application for a petition:

“Assembly chair Felix Rivera [COMMITTED MISCONDUCT IN OFFICE] on August 11, 2020 [BY VIOLATING] violated EO-15, an emergency order intended to protect the health and safety of Anchorage citizens, issued by the Mayor of Anchorage pursuant to AMC 3.80.060(H) by: 1) knowingly participating in an indoor gathering of more than 15 people (a meeting of the Anchorage Assembly) and 2) continuing to participate in an indoor gathering of more than 15 people at a meeting of the Anchorage Assembly after being specifically informed of the violation. Assembly chair Rivera failed to perform prescribed duties as chair of the Assembly by allowing the August 11 meeting he was presiding over to continue in violation of EO-15 after the violation was brought to his attention by a point of order. Of all citizens in Anchorage the chair of the Anchorage Assembly should have been scrupulous in obeying the gathering limitation established by paragraph 4 of EO-15. His failure to do so needlessly endangered the lives of Anchorage citizens, encouraged the spread of COVID-19 throughout the community, and merits recall from office.”

The Alaska Supreme Court has ruled that petitioners can allege anything, whether or not the grounds seem sufficient. That’s what the court decided on the petition to recall Gov. Mike Dunleavy last year.

In a memo to the lead sponsor of the petition, Municipal Clerk Barbara Jones wrote “Signatures may only be collected by petition sponsors. Current petition sponsors are yourself, Ms. Brophy, and 11 of the 12 people who signed the petition application. Signer Paula Ferguson’s signature could not be verified, so Paula Ferguson is not authorized to be a sponsor and collect signatures. Additional sponsors may be added at any time before the petition is filed by submitting the name of the sponsor to the clerk.”

Sponsor Russell Biggs says because of his work, he cannot gather signatures himself and he and his cosponsors had intended to hire a professional to finish the job.

 The petition must have signatures from enough voters to equal 25 percent of the number that voted in the last election for that office. The group is looking for signature gatherers to volunteer.

Biggs has asked the Clerk to clarify the terms she laid out for gathering signatures.

The last election for Rivera was in 2020. Some 11,000 voted in the Assembly election that Rivera recently won, which means the group will need 2,750 good signatures of voters to force a special recall election.