Saturday, October 17, 2026
Home Blog Page 1131

God Bless America: Don’t let them cancel the flag or the men on the mountain

By SUZANNE DOWNING

The New York Times suggested on Saturday that if you see a flag flying from the back of a pickup truck, you might be right to think that the driver is a Republican, and that person might be a threat.

“Today, flying the American flag from the back of a pickup truck or over a lawn is increasingly seen as a clue, albeit an imperfect one, to a person’s political affiliation in a deeply divided nation,” the Times tweeted, and linked to a column, “A Fourth of July Symbol of Unity That May No Longer Unite.”

“What was once a unifying symbol — there is a star on it for each state, after all — is now alienating to some, its stripes now fault lines between people who kneel while ‘The Star-Spangled Banner’ plays and those for whom not pledging allegiance is an affront,” the writer said.

There’s some truth to that. In my observations over the past year, I’ve noticed that homes with “Black Lives Matter” signs or “In this home we believe” signs on them never have an American flag flying anywhere. It’s as if they are allergic to the Red, White, and Blue.

Some political party, and some political movement is making the American Flag into a symbol of hate, and it’s not the Republican Party. It’s not patriots who are weaponizing the flag, and it’s not veterans or military personnel. It’s not the families across the heartland.

Those who hate America because it is not perfect have taught generations to also condemn the country’s foundations; the lesson has been embedded well in a growing segment of the population, and especially the media.

The New York Times may be leading the charge against the American Flag, suggesting it is no longer an acceptable symbol of our country, but it’s been an infection festering for years, ever since the election of Donald Trump as president.

The cancel culture movement against the flag started softly on the fringes, such as when Mother Jones wrote in 2019 that the flag “represents a country deeply divided along partisan lines, led by a man who disguises bigoted populism as patriotism. It’s also a symbol for a resurgent movement of white nationalists who cloak their hate in the stars and stripes, even as they defend Confederate monuments.”

In Time magazine in 2020, a columnist wrote: “The election of Donald Trump calcified my ambivalence into an ambiguous wariness stemming from an unambiguous truth. The sort of (white) people who clamber to distinguish themselves as the True Americans have weaponized the flag, manipulating it to antagonize those they believe to be less American. Trump didn’t create this dynamic, sure. Prominent American flags are hard to ignore when scanning footage of lynchings and Klan rallies from the ‘40s, ‘50s and ‘60s. But the bedrock of Trump’s political career is the ceaseless exacerbation of this feeling.”

Now, the New York Times mainstreams the concept that the flag represents what they call “white nationalism.”

Of course, the flag is not all they are trying to cancel. Earlier this year, President Joe Biden’s Administration prohibited a fireworks display on the Fourth of July at Mount Rushmore, one of our nation’s great monuments to freedom and democracy.

The fireworks display at Mount Rushmore on Independence Day is a tradition almost all Americans love. Sometimes it has been canceled due to wildfire danger, but the state of South Dakota cherishes the celebration of the Declaration of Independence.

This year, the Biden Administration said no for purely political reasons. National Park Service Regional Director Herbert Frost wrote in March that his agency is “unable to grant a request to have fireworks at the Memorial. Potential risks to the park itself and to the health and safety of employees and visitors associated with the fireworks demonstration continue to be a concern and are still being evaluated as a result of the 2020 event. In addition, the park’s many tribal partners expressly oppose fireworks at the Memorial.”

Ah, there you have it. Radicalized tribal members objected, and the Biden Administration will take a knee. How much longer will it be until the Democrats come after the Washington Monument because the father of our country was not perfect.

“These factors, compiled with the COVID-19 pandemic, do not allow a safe and responsible fireworks display to be held at this site,” the NPS wrote, blaming Covid.

If not at Mount Rushmore, then where on public land would fireworks be appropriate?

They — the mainstream media and the Democrats — are coming for Mount Rushmore and they are weaponizing our American Flag.

If there was ever a time to fly the Stars and Stripes, it is now, as we patiently wait for the infection of hatred that festers in our country to subside. Let your American Flag be the vaccine against this virus of hate that threatens our republic.

Suzanne Downing publishes and writes for Must Read Alaska and Must Read America.

Woman says she was removed from Alaska Airlines jet for wearing a ‘Trump’ mask

Sara Gamache is an avid bowhunter and archery competitor living in Seattle. She has flown Alaska Airlines all of her life. But no more.

On June 24, Gamache was removed from a flight bound from Seattle to Denver because she boarded the jet wearing a mask with the word “Trump 2020” and “F*ck your feelings” on it in smaller letters.

Flight attendants told Gamache to remove the mask and wear a plain mask, an order that she complied with since she had a black mask in her purse.

But then, without explanation, the attendants returned to her row, told her she would have to get off the plane, and so would her husband.

Sara Gamache said she was bullied by Alaska Airlines over her Trump mask.

Must Read Alaska spoke with Gamache to confirm her story and we reached out to Alaska Airlines, but have received no response.

Gamache said what she experienced that day was bullying by the flight attendants. In her post on Instagram about the event, and confirmed in an interview with her, she said she was asked to remove her Trump mask because it was against the company “policy” concerning profanity.

“To avoid any conflict or delaying the flight any further, I immediately complied and changed the Trump mask to a solid black one (which you see in the video). However, they came back to my seat 5 minutes later saying I was getting kicked off anyways because the mask I was originally wearing made people feel uncomfortable,” Gamache wrote.

She said she has worn the mask on at least six previous Alaska Airlines flights. Gamache, who was on her way to an archery competition in Colorado, asked to see the policy, but the flight attendants refused to provide it, and said the plane needed to take off, so she needed to leave.

As she exited the jet, a number of people in the back of the plane screamed profanities at her, called her names, and a flight attendant mocked her: “How does it feel to be humiliated? … the fact that the back of the plane is clapping that you’re getting kicked off.”

“The worst part is they kicked my husband off. He is active duty military so he couldn’t say anything and didn’t say one word the entire time. He had ZERO involvement, yet was unfairly removed as well,” Gamache wrote. Her husband is Army Special Forces, and cannot wear any political messages; he had not said a word during the entire episode. Gamache said no matter how the flight attendants felt about her mask, they had no call to remove her husband.

“The good news is I document everything and have photos of me wearing this EXACT same mask on other Alaska Airlines flights and there was no issue, proving that on this flight I was kicked off strictly because of the beliefs of the flight attendants,” she said on her Instagram post.

Sara Gamache’s Instagram account of the incident is at this link

Gamache is not done. Through her attorney, she has asked for an apology from Alaska Airlines, but has received no response. She is launching a website next week, saying it will be a place where other people can share their stories about Alaska Airlines’ treatment of passengers. She has also received a permit to protest outside their headquarters, and plans to do so.

As for her trip to the archery competition, Gamache decided not to board an Alaska Airlines jet. She took Southwest instead.

LinkedIn censors MRAK story about Hope Center’s lawsuit against Anchorage

The social media platform LinkedIn has censored a Must Read Alaska story about the Downtown Hope Center’s lawsuit against the Municipality of Anchorage. The lawsuit, filed Wednesday, seeks to protect abused women in the shelter from having to sleep on the floor alongside biological males, and the report about the lawsuit was a factual telling of the situation.

Read: Hope Center sues again to keep transgendered men out of sleeping area

The pattern of Big Tech deleting stories that its censors is occurring across many of the now-traditional platforms — LinkedIn, Facebook, and even Twitter. Earlier this year, YouTube took down content from the Must Read Alaska page on that site. The removed content was footage of public testimony at the Anchorage Assembly meeting when people testified on the record in the Assembly Chambers about the unwelcome Covid-19 policies’ effects on their lives.

News sites such as Must Read Alaska have branched out; our stories also are posted on MeWe.com and other sites that value free speech.

LinkedIn said the story about the lawsuit goes against its community standards, which include: Be Safe, Be Trustworthy, Be Professional.

This is the first known case of MRAK content being actually censored.

Earlier this week, Facebook warned users about extremist content, in reference to Anchorage Mayor Dave Bronson’s Event post for the inaugural block party on the Delaney Park Strip.

Read: Facebook warns of extremist content on mayor’s invitation to block party

Among the rules posted by LinkedIn for its content are:

“Do not share false or misleading content: Do not share content in a way that you know is, or think may be, misleading or inaccurate, including misinformation or disinformation. Do not share content to interfere with or improperly influence an election or another civic process. We may prevent you from posting content from sites that are known to produce or contain misinformation. Do not share content that directly contradicts guidance from leading global health organizations and public health authorities. Do not post content that denies a well-documented historical event such as the Holocaust or slavery. Do not share false content or information, including news stories, that present untrue facts or events as though they are true or likely true. Do not post “deepfake” images or videos of others or otherwise post content that has been manipulated to deceive. Do not share content or endorse someone or something in exchange for personal benefit (including personal or family relationships, monetary payment, free products or services, or other value), unless you have included a clear and conspicuous notice of the personal benefit you receive and have otherwise complied with our Advertising Policies.”

Hope Center sues city again to keep transgendered men out of sleeping area

A faith-based women’s shelter in downtown Anchorage filed a lawsuit in federal court this week to once again stop Anchorage officials from using a new ordinance to force the Hope Center shelter to admit males and let them sleep alongside women who have suffered physical and sexual abuse.

The controversial ordinance, passed last month, also shuts down the Downtown Hope Center’s ability to communicate about its religious beliefs on its website and on other signs posted around the center.

“Downtown Hope Center serves everyone, and its overnight women’s shelter exists to provide a safe place for women, many of whom have suffered due to sex trafficking, rape, or domestic violence at the hands of men,” said Alliance Defending Freedom’s Senior Counsel Kate Anderson.

“Women deserve a place to sleep where they can feel secure. City officials have no business trying to force the center to violate its beliefs by demanding that the shelter allow biological men to sleep mere feet from vulnerable women. This is the second attempt by the city to force Downtown Hope Center to violate its religious beliefs to the detriment of the women it serves,” she said.

Read: Targeting women and faith, Anchorage women’s shelter is made illegal by Anchorage ordinance

This is the second time the center has had to defend its practice of allowing only biological women to spend the night. In 2018, the faith-based group filed a federal lawsuit against the city after the shelter referred an inebriated and injured man to a hospital to get the care he needed and paid for his taxi ride there.

Read: Transgender files lawsuit against faith-based women’s shelter

The man later filed a complaint with the Anchorage Equal Rights Commission alleging the center didn’t let him stay at the shelter, where he would have been sleeping next to abused and homeless women. The city then chose to pursue the complaint against the center, prompting ADF attorneys to file suit on the center’s behalf.

The city eventually dropped the complaint, and both the city and the center agreed to make the court’s temporary order against the city permanent. But since the city’s first loss in federal court, the Anchorage Assembly has amended the city ordinance in an attempt to find a new way to target Downtown Hope Center and force it to let males sleep next to women who have been abused.

Related: LinkedIn has censored this story

“All Americans should be free to live out their faith and serve their neighbors—especially homeless women who have suffered sexual abuse or domestic violence—without being targeted or harassed by the government,” said ADF Senior Counsel Ryan Tucker, director of the ADF Center for Christian Ministries. “Downtown Hope Center is once again in court standing up for its religious beliefs. No woman—particularly not an abuse survivor—should be forced to sleep or disrobe next to a man.”

Sonja Redmond, one of nearly 3,500 attorneys allied with ADF, is local counsel for Downtown Hope Center in the case, The Downtown Soup Kitchen d/b/a Downtown Hope Center v. Municipality of Anchorage, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska.

Social engineering: Facebook puts ‘extremist content’ warning on Anchorage Mayor Bronson’s inaugural invitation

At least one Facebook user was shocked to see that on an official invitation from Anchorage Mayor Dave Bronson to the inaugural block party on Thursday, Facebook had inserted a caution: “Are you concerned that someone you know is becoming an extremist? We care about preventing extremism on Facebook. Others in your situation have received confidential support.”

Facebook admits it is rolling out an initiative to combat extremism on its platform. Other users are being notified that they may have been exposed to “extremist content,” and are redirected to a page to help them.

Evidently something about the mayor’s inaugural block party was deemed extremist by Facebook. Was it the Polynesian dancers? The Native drummers? The Anchorage Police Department booth or the children’s bouncy house? Perhaps it was the live country band Sixwire, or the fact that Democrat Forrest Dunbar didn’t win, or the protest transvestites parading the perimeter of the event in women’s lingerie.

Who knows what is triggering the social media giant these days to flag the users of its platform?

One man brought an American flag to the Bronson Block Party to celebrate the inauguration of the new mayor.

According to Fox, CNN, and other mainstream media sources, such notifications just started showing up Thursday as part of a Facebook test to identify people on the platform who have engaged with or were exposed to what Facebook considers extremist content. The company is partnering with unknown nonprofits and academics to further what it calls the “Redirect Initiative.”

Have you seen the warning on your Facebook feed? Leave a description in the comments below.

Jamie Allard: Ready for independence! Taking back our city means keeping our focus, staying courageous, and true to our course

11

By JAMIE ALLARD

The founders of our nation fought hard for freedom. They risked, they bled, and they died for freedom.

“We Mutually Pledge To Each Other Our Lives, Our Fortunes And Our Sacred Honor,” words written in the Declaration of Independence, show they were under no illusion about how tough the fight would be to establish a new nation based on liberty and law.

One thing they did not do is lose their nerve and they didn’t give up when it got tough. When they decided to break away from England on July 4, 1776, they faced horrific setbacks and terrible times. But they kept marching forward, against an oppressive government.

In Anchorage, we’ve had a small taste of that oppression over the past year, which ought to be a warning to us all. Conservatives stayed quiet and uninvolved in local politics for a few years, and when the Covid threat came, liberty after liberty was stripped. People didn’t see it coming. They never thought their fellow Americans would cave so quickly.

That’s the thing about conservatives — we are often focused on our families, our faith homes, and our jobs. We volunteer and we love to get out and enjoy the world. While we were focused on our lives and paying attention to other things, our city was taken by hardliners, and then our freedoms were quickly stripped from us.

How quickly we forget that just last November, there were actual executive orders from the acting mayor that limited the number of people who could gather for Thanksgiving in private homes. Worship services were canceled by order. Funerals were canceled. Memorial Day, the Fourth of July, and Veterans Day suffered the same fate.

Traditions and families were kept apart and Anchorage became an oppressive city, ruled by fear and misinformation.

No more. We celebrate Independence Day this year not only for the founding of our country, but for the taking back of our city.

On Thursday afternoon, you could see how ready people were to celebrate freedom at the block party for Mayor Dave Bronson’s inauguration. People were dancing, singing, and smiles were seen everywhere. There were a thousand or more people at the Delaney Park Strip, many who wore red, white, and blue. Nobody even minded the transgender men who walked around the perimeter in women’s lingerie.

I go into this Independence Day weekend bursting with pride for my city, and her people who voted their values, and especially for those many campaign and grassroots volunteers who worked hard to turn Anchorage back to what we can be again — a community of possibility and opportunity. They sacrificed many hours, weeks, and months.

I also believe that a momentary victory can lull us into thinking we’re out of danger. We are not, Anchorage. We must keep our focus at the local level — on local Assembly and School Board races, or all we have fought for can be quickly undone by the radical Left.

Anchorage, be proud and move forward. But do not forget what happened in 2020. Another election is just ahead, and we cannot take our eyes off the road if we truly want our city to shine again.

God bless everyone, and may God bless America.

Jamie Allard is your assemblywoman for Chugiak/Eagle River and was chosen by Must Read Alaska readers as Alaskan of the Year.

Another one: District 29 Republicans endorse Tshibaka for U.S. Senate

District 29 Republicans, deep in the red heart of the Kenai Peninsula, have endorsed Kelly Tshibaka for U.S. Senate. Tshibaka is challenging Sen. Lisa Murkowski for the seat that has been held by the Murkowskis for over 40 years. The bonus vote on the District 29 committee, Barb Blakeley, announced the endorsement at the Kenai Peninsula Republican Women’s Club meeting on Thursday.

This makes 10 Republican groups that have endorsed Tshibaka so far: District 21, 12, 14, 15, and 29, both Kenai Republican women’s clubs, both Mat-Su Valley Republican women’s clubs, and the Anchorage Republican Women’s Club. Also, Bikers for Trump, and former President Donald Trump himself.

District 29 is another conservative part of the state, centered in the Nikiski, Sterling, and Seward.

Tshibaka was recently spotted in Kodiak, after a trip to Utqiagvik last week.

Attorney General Merrick Garland places moratorium on federal executions

U.S. Attorney General Merrick B. Garland issued a moratorium on federal executions, while a review of the Justice Department’s policies and procedures is pending.

“The Department of Justice must ensure that everyone in the federal criminal justice system is not only afforded the rights guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of the United States, but is also treated fairly and humanely,” Garland said. “That obligation has special force in capital cases.”

In the last two years, the Justice Department made changes to capital case policies and procedures, and it carried out the first federal executions in nearly two decades between July 2020 and January 2021.

Justice adopted a new protocol for administering lethal injections at the federal Bureau of Prisons, using the drug pentobarbital.

Attorney General Garland’s directive orders his department to do a multi-pronged review of these recent policy changes, including:

  • Assessing, among other things, the risk of pain and suffering associated with the use of pentobarbital.
  • A review coordinated by the Office of Legal Policy to consider changes to Justice Department regulations made in November 2020 that expanded the permissible methods of execution beyond lethal injection, and authorized the use of state facilities and personnel in federal executions.
  • A review of the Justice Manual’s capital case provisions, including the December 2020 and January 2021 changes to expedite execution of capital sentences.

No federal executions will be scheduled while the reviews are pending, he said, and there is no definite date for when they will begin again.

Garland could have been appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court, as he was nominated in 2016 by President Barack Obanma. His nomination was blocked by conservative senators in 2016. This year, he was nominated by President Joe Biden to be U.S. Attorney General, and Alaska’s delegation was split: Lisa Murkowski voted yes while Dan Sullivan voted no. The Senate confirmed Garland, 70-30.