Monday, April 27, 2026
Home Blog Page 1128

For Andrew Halcro, a crowning achievement is the boarding up of downtown Anchorage

By SUZANNE DOWNING

“Hasty endings always leave things unsaid,” according to Andrew Halcro, who went on in his guest column in the Anchorage Daily News to express his appreciation for his former boss, Mayor Ethan Berkowitz.

Berkowitz himself had a hasty and embarrassing ending in city government, far weirder than the abrupt departure of Halcro, the former head of the Anchorage Community Development Authority, whose goal was to turn downtown into a residential area, and forsake it as a business center.

“Hard work goes unrecognized. Credit goes unclaimed. Thanks and appreciation are not expressed. This is my opportunity to pay that marker,” Halcro wrote, as he launched into an explanation of his crowning achievement – the boarding up of the downtown  Anchorage transit center.

Like so much of downtown Anchorage, the transit center was a hazard to those who dared.

Halcro wrote about how it was such a wonderful project when it opened as a welcoming gathering place in the 1980s. But over the past few years, “society changed, the building did not.” 

Society changed, all right. In the last six years, under the wandering eye of Mayor Ethan Berkowitz, Anchorage had deteriorated, and is now hardly recognizable to those who return after years away. Gone are the flower beds, gone are hipster and gift shops downtown. Stores are boarded up, and Halcro viewed the transit center “downtown’s biggest threat to public health and safety.”

During Berkowitz’ five and a half years as mayor, the transit center, which is right next to City Hall, became so unsafe that he simply closed it. Consider that for a moment: A building right next to City Hall could not be made safe.

Just what in society changed? Under Berkowitz-Halcro, downtown was a nightmare: Nordstrom left, the streets were roamed by thugs, and by the time the pandemic hit, there wasn’t enough resiliency to hope for a turnaround anytime soon.

“However, one the biggest untold success stories of my past five years hasn’t been what we’ve added, but what we’ve subtracted — while proper credit has never been given,” Halcro wrote in the Anchorage Daily News.

“So, after years reading the horror stories about drug dealing, sex trafficking and violence in the center and my own experience of crossing the street to avoid this building, I spent the first 75 days on the job stationed in the transit center. My team and I would spend hours every day trying to understand the flow of the building, interviewing the people, trying to study the demographics and the tenants. When we weren’t inside the facility, we were studying security footage to identify bad actors and patterns of behavior. After 75 days, neither increased security nor reduced hours made a bit of difference.,” Halcro wrote. 

Berkowitz-Halcro gave up, and shuttered the building.  

“The center was the only warm public place, so it attracted people with no intent of taking the bus, some of whom were there with ill intent. At any given time, only one-third of the people in the building were there for legitimate purposes; the rest were a mixture of loiterers, public inebriates, drug dealers and sex traffickers. In one picture I took, there were 15 people in the frame, and only two were there to actually catch a bus — the rest were drunk and loitering. The tenants were barely surviving, and I was positive at least one of our tenants was a front for drugs. Many days, I would find there would be more first-responder vehicles at the center than buses. My cost of security and janitorial were approaching $1 million per year. The only solution was to shut and gut the building. Without hesitation, Mayor Berkowitz agreed.”

Halcro stated that he owes that crowning achievement to Mayor Berkowitz. 

Readers of this news site will recall that Berkowitz, entangled in a bizarre text-sex relationship with a news anchor, was in charge during the worst crime wave in Anchorage history, and the general decline and fall of downtown, while the Mat-Su Valley flourished.

It’s remarkable that Halcro would dare to document this, his proudest moment.

In hindsight, Anchorage owes former news anchor Maria Athens a debt of gratitude for exposing and then ridding the city of the Berkowitz era by publishing a smidgen of the backside of Berkowitz, causing him to quickly resign in disgrace. At least give the gal a key to the city.

“I would like to personally recognize Ethan for the trust and confidence he placed in me over the past five years by giving me a long leash and always keeping his word. He deserves as much credit as anyone — not just for the transformation of the transit center, but for his role in supporting ACDA in all of our historic accomplishments over the last five years, and for that I say thank you,” Halcro wrote. 

The transformation, in layman’s terms, means papered-over windows.

In fairness, the low-income housing development Elizabeth Place was another achievement for Halcro in his efforts to rebuild a downtown economy. And he installed a prison-yard basketball court on top of the Fifth Avenue Mall parking garage, which is forlorn most of the time. The food truck park he envisioned for downtown is unfulfilled. The closure of Nordstrom, of course, is an achievement that is unparalleled in the Berkowitz-Halcro tenure, and as of Sunday, the colorful panels boarding up the entry to the once-proud building were starting to come off in large sections; one was resting on the ground, unattended.

Overall, with so much to talk about, it’s a odd that Halcro would choose shutting down the transit center as his proudest moment. And to thank the mayor for helping him put mass transit riders out in the cold? With friends like that, Mayor Berkowitz, who needs frenemies?

Suzanne Downing is publisher of Must Read Alaska and Must Read America.

Anchorage police decline to endorse Dunbar for mayor

32

After severals days of internal debate, the Anchorage Police Department Employee Association walked away from endorsing Forrest Dunbar for mayor.

In the end, the membership forced the leaders of the union to endorse no one. In doing so, they robbed Dunbar of an expected endorsement, finding him unfit to support at this time. That means the big union political action money from other unions, such as the AFL-CIO, will not be able to boast of a police endorsement.

The APDEA endorsement almost always goes to the Democrat candidate for mayor, because of the negotiated contracts that they expect to be more favorable under a liberal mayor. The union’s main role is to protect the contracts.

But even contracts were not enough to convince the membership, which came out solidly against Dunbar, who is known for his support of anti-police rioters. During the Portland riots last year, Dunbar opined that he knew that his own mother would be joining in the riots with the Wall of Moms if she could. He never mentioned his support for the Portland police who were being overwhelmed and attacked nightly by Antifa and Black Lives Matter rioters.

Wall of Moms is a group that identifies as mothers and who protects rioters from police by standing between officers and rioters, daring the officers to pepper spray them.

As for Bronson, he wrote a letter to Anchorage police officers on Saturday, saying that he believes ANTIFA is “a domestic terrorist group and should be treated accordingly,” and that “some divisions of Black Lives Matter are violent and anti-American.” Bronson said that the “defund the police” movement is an organized effort to “damage our police departments, harm our citizens, and make our streets less safe.”

Bronson wrote that “as all lives matter, blue lives matter.” He said he would negotiate contracts on behalf of all citizens, including police, and seek contract terms that balance all the needs of the community.

He said he would end any effort to defund, in any way, the Anchorage Police Department and would not introduce, support, or advance any effort that resembles the former AO 37, a measure that put more conditions on what could be negotiated in union contracts, such as no contracts could be over three years long.

Art Chance: 50 years, an oil boom, and how we broke the Alaska economy

By ART CHANCE

My biological daughter will turn 50 in a few weeks. Her very pregnant mother and I were living in her childhood bedroom in her parents’ house in Atlanta. We’d had our run at being rebels without a clue; we’d run off to the Pacific Northwest, where she had some friends and I was something of a curiosity with my redneck Georgia ways.   

I had something of an ongoing controversy with Redneck Georgia law that remained unresolved.  We hadn’t had an “accident” and having a child together was a conscious choice. I had a decent job and we were able to provide for ourselves, but we both agreed that we needed the security of hearth and home to bring a child into the World, so we returned to Georgia.   

Drive a 1962 Chevy Corvair with no reverse gear across America and then talk to me about adventures; we had the time of our lives with the two of us and a half-Airedale mutt. That “Me and You and a Dog Named Boo” could have been written about us, but our dog was named Owsley; only some of you will know what that means. Her parents didn’t like me because I was Georgia white trash, and my parents didn’t like her because she was a Yankee. This was a marriage based on stupid, but she had a child in her belly.

We walked into the world of corporate Atlanta in 1971. Few married women worked in 1971,  so  I quickly secured a job as a management trainee for a major retailer; I’d learned to walk in a retail store, so it came naturally. I was “salaried,” so we didn’t count hours, but I was making $4 or $5 an hour, a princely sum in those days, in the South anyway. It was enough for a gated apartment complex with a pool and clubhouse, an Italian sporty car, and pretty good entertainment. We could send the kid to Montessori school, and my lady worked part-time because she wanted to. 

Banks and credit card companies weren’t generous in those days. My employer gave me a credit card with a $300 limit and somewhere along the way I got an American Express Green Card.  American Express once had that credit card thing down; you paid the bill at the end of the month, or you didn’t have any credit.  In those days, a Green Card was a status symbol. If you had a Gold Card, you were golden. Even though houses were only $20-$30K for nice three-bedrooms in the suburbs in those days, only those with good-in-laws could come up with the down payment when they were only a year or two out on their own.

We of that generation walked into paying the bills for President Lyndon B. Johnson’s “guns and butter” policy in the Vietnam Era. LBJ and a Democrat Congress determined to pay for the “Great Society” social welfare programs and the war in Vietnam with borrowed money.   

We of my time (born in 1949) walked into the world of paying LBJ’s debts. President Richard Nixon tried to keep it under control with what had once been regarded as wartime measures like wage and price controls. To add insult to injury, we had the Arab oil embargo in 1974, which crushed what was left of the U.S. economy.  

I had moved on to private enterprise and was a partner in a shop in Atlanta’s entertainment district.  We were living pretty high on the pig, basically a life out of “Good Fella’s,” until it all died as the oil embargo ended tourism.   

I bailed and bought a bunch of outdoor gear and a Land Cruiser and struck out “North to Alaska;” I’d read that they had that “Pipeline thing” going on there.

Just like Weimar Germany, Alaska’s heavily unionized economy allowed the economy to keep up with inflation; as the prices went up, the wages went up.  Alaska weathered the 1970s by inflating its economy, and while there were some tough times in the late Seventies, after completion of the pipeline but before significant oil revenue began to flow into the State treasury, Alaska prospered as never before.   

The early ‘80s were Alaska’s “Blue-eyed Arab” days; we had more money than we knew what to do with. And then it all went to Hell; the price of oil went from $30 and change to less than $10 a barrel.  Dreams of domed Capital cities and huge hydroelectric dams died painful deaths.

Fast forward to 2021: We have a broken Alaska economy. We have a faltering US economy as the result of the Chinese attack on the U.S. – yeah there is the hook for all you lefty trolls.   

Now we have to pay the bill for the last few years. President Trump’s spending on the China Virus was scary, but it was cheaper than a war that really wouldn’t have resolved anything.  We could have turned China into a sheet of glass, but it would have cost us some major U.S. cities, including Anchorage; you can print more money.

Now the communists, excuse me — Democrats, are being their natural selves and reaching as far into the cookie jar as they can.  Their so-called infrastructure and COVID relief bills are nothing more than “walking around money” bills for Democrat constituencies with a minor amount — 10 percent or so — that actually goes to COVID or infrastructure; typical Democrat sham.   

Between the Trump and Biden Administrations, we’ve added around $10 trillion to the national debt in the last year or so. That bill is coming due, and soon.  

The notion that the U.S. can just endlessly print money is today’s version of “voodoo economics,” fundamentally you can only print money so long as somebody will take your money. Recall that it wasn’t Christian ideas of sin and degeneracy that caused the decline and fall of the Western Roman Empire; it was the debasement of their silver currency to the point where nobody would any longer take their currency.   

The Chinese would be happy to have the Yuan rather than the U.S. dollar become the world’s reserve currency, and the Biden Administration seems intent on helping its Chinese friends do that.

The last several U.S. Administrations have rendered the Consumer Price Index meaningless; they’ve taken the economically volatile products that really give an indication of inflation out of the index, so the index doesn’t indicate much anymore, and they can claim that there isn’t much inflation, and they can control that with their “quantitative easing” and other central bank sorcery; go take a look at your grocery bill or buy some 2 X 4s if you’d like a reality check.

Just as the explosive rise of fuel prices in the run-up to the 2006 election and the crash of the housing market in 2006 “snuck up” on us, we will face 1970’s “stagflation within the next year or so; the U.S. economy is going to hell. 

My grandkids are older than my new-born daughter was in the early 1970s, but their world is just as daunting, maybe more so. 

Frankly, Alaska was our salvation; we could make ourselves worth more as the costs of everything went up; you couldn’t do that in most of the Lower 48 and many families went bust in the Seventies and early Eighties. Reagan and Volker’s steps to control inflation in the Eighties were dramatically painful; I knew families who had been free-holders since the late 1700’s who didn’t survive the Eighties as free-holders.   Most of us here in Alaska made it because we could ride the inflationary wave – until it broke in 1985.   All good things must end.

Our children and grand-children have lost a year and more of their lives; time they’re unlikely to get back. The economy is certain to crash in the next couple of years. We’ll see if there remain any people in the US who can rise to leadership rather than just to demagoguery; my money is on media-driven demagoguery.



Boutin: Snow machines on side roads work fine in New Hampshire, so why not here?

By TOMAS BOUTIN

The Governor Dunleavy Administration has a proposal to allow people to use off-road and utility vehicles on specific highways.  

Just over three years ago I was visiting family in northern New Hampshire, the state with its motto Live Free or Die on all license plates, and it was the first time I had been there since ORVs became legal on almost all highways except the Interstate Highway System.  

It was startling to meet a group of thirty or more ORVs traveling from motels to access trails and logging roads. But I have to say it worked very well. The people were having fun, and while I cannot recall being inconvenienced by this recreational use of the highway, it would have been OK with me had I somehow been inconvenienced.  

During the visit I ran into a forester I have long known, and a trapper I know, and both told me that they often use snowmobiles now without having to first transport them by pickup.  

Motel and restaurant owners there say that side-by-side ORVs and the then still relatively new law has already become very important to the NH tourism industry.  

I saw and heard of absolutely no problems with this NH law nor in its practice. However it seems that whenever people are having fun there is some who are angry about it – exactly the way they react to the cruise ship tourism industry here in Juneau. There may be people who find fault, but I didn’t encounter any in NH.  After all, it’s a state where people shaking hands often recite the state motto.  

No doubt there are accidents and conflicts; the Live Free or Die state has 1.7 million people in the same area as the Chugach National Forest. Millions of people live just a few hours to the south and come to New Hampshire to hunt, ski, and now ride their snowmobiles and off-road vehicles.  But I cannot imagine there will be many problems in Alaska, and if people are going to drive impaired it’s better to have them on a snowmobile than in a pickup. 

Here in Alaska, the local city government encourages me to plow out nearby fire hydrants, and I am glad to do that with my new skid steer when plowing snow, but I have been led to believe I am breaking the law by running on the highway to do so. 

Let’s face it, Alaska laws have serious inconsistencies and allowing me to legally run my backhoe, skid steer and ORV on the highway will resolve one of them.  

Throughout much of Alaska, everyone can run just about any vehicle on the state maintained and the municipally maintained roads but I am prohibited here in Juneau, somewhat like I pay $16 a day in residential property tax toward schools, law enforcement, etc. while people in many surrounding towns pay nothing.   

This proposed rule may erase one inequity. If the new rule is adopted, and if my local government doesn’t throw a wrench in it, I will buy a snowmobile, if I can find room to store one.

Tomas Boutin is a forester who lives in Juneau.

Who is David Chipman?

By THE ANCHORAGE DAILY PLANET

President Joe Biden’s nominee to lead the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is David Chipman, a longtime BATF special agent and fierce advocate for gun control, the perfect guy to head an agency that enforces gun laws and regulations for an anti-gun administration.

He is a senior policy adviser at the organization led by former Congresswoman Gabby Giffords, who became a gun control advocate after being shot in 2011.

For his part, Chipman says on his LinkedIn profile that he is a “Violent Crime Reduction Strategist,” “Certified Explosives Specialist” and “Interagency Liaison Specialist.” His expertise, he says, includes ghost guns, the gun industry, law enforcement and assault weapons.

Biden has directed his administration to attack so-called ghost guns, which are handmade or self-assembled guns without serial numbers, and pistol braces.

Chapman left the BATF in 2012, and became a senior adviser at Everytown for Gun Safety, then he became senior vice president of Public Safety Solutions before joining Giffords as a senior policy adviser in 2016.

“As a former ATF special agent with more than 24 years of experience at the bureau, I know all too well how serious our gun violence problem is and how desperately the agency lacks for the law enforcement tools that are necessary to help curb this national epidemic,” Chipman wrote in a 2013 Politico op-ed.

The country’s gun safety laws, he wrote at the time, “make it all too easy for guns to fall into the wrong hands – and since Congress has failed to address these gaps legislatively, ATF must chart a new course to combat the scourge of gun violence. This requires strong leadership.”

In a 2019 interview with PBS NewsHour, Chipman also supported limiting high-capacity magazine.

“Talking to any gun owner, a 100-round magazine is just not traditional. It’s not normal. And I can’t think of a purpose, beyond killing a lot of people, for having it,” he said. “So if the debate is, should it be 10 or what have you, it can’t be 100. And so I think there’s room where we can have progress, although we will not have perfection.”

It seems to us Chipman is just another leftist bureaucrat who is quite sure that what he believes is what is best for law-abiding Americans; that the Second Amendment really is just advisory despite the “shall not be infringed” language.

The ATF, an embattled agency constantly under fire because of its war on gun owners and the firearms industry, has been without a permanent director since 2015. With any luck at all, that will continue and Chipman will not be confirmed.

Read more at Anchorage Daily Planet.

MRAK poll: Police should back Bronson; Mike Robbins endorses Bronson

12

Mike Robbins wasted no time after last week’s election in throwing his support to Dave Bronson for Anchorage mayor in the May 11 runoff. To his supporters on Saturday night, Robbins wrote a letter of endorsement, thanking them for their support and encouraging them to vote for Bronson.

Meanwhile, a Facebook poll by Must Read Alaska asked the public if the Anchorage Police Department Employee Association should endorse Bronson or the Democrat who trails him, Forrest Dunbar.

The 18-hour result of the poll is 480-4 in favor of Bronson. The Must Read Alaska poll, while unscientific, may represent a more pro-law-enforcement audience of conservatives. Take the poll at this link:

Robbins was gracious in his support of Bronson.

“As the election dust settles, and it’s clear we didn’t reach the municipal run-off, Tetyana and I convey our deepest appreciation, humility, and respect for your time, resources, and support of the mayoral campaign. Every one of you meaningfully contributed to our momentum and it’s endearing to our family. The journey of the last eight months has been amazing, especially because of people like you. Tetyana and I could never have guessed we would meet and form relationships with so many new friends and reconnect with so many old friends. We feel much richer for the experience,” Robbins said, adding that he was inspired by all the people he has met during the campaign season.

Robbins and Bronson met on Friday, and Robbins pledged his support, he said.

“Dave Bronson is the last man standing of the conservative candidates. He is the candidate voters chose to defeat Forrest Dunbar, and he must win – to ensure we don’t plummet into further socialism and the anti-business, anti-American-values abyss we’ve suffered the last 5+ years. To do this we need to come together,” Robbins wrote.

“I encourage you to connect with Dave and his campaign, dialogue on his plan, and your priorities. If you deem his mission for our city, and his management team, to be in concert with your vision and desired outcome as I have, please donate to the cause and support him. A Dunbar Administration will be a disaster for the GOP, conservatives, faith-based, education system, businesses, entrepreneurial growth, housing and urban development, and the needed efficiencies to help reduce our tax burden,” Robbins wrote. 

Bronson said, “Mike and Tetyana Robbins’ endorsement means the world to me. As I’ve gotten to know Mike through the campaign, he has won my admiration and respect, and I’m honored to know we are on the same page for a better Anchorage.”

Tight mayor’s race: ‘Good government Bronson’ widens gap again, margin tight

Mayoral candidate Dave Bronson widened the gap between him and Assemblyman Forrest Dunbar in the latest vote tally from the Anchorage Division of Elections.

For Saturday’s count, Bronson now has 522 more votes than Dunbar. Bronson has 19,334 votes, and Dunbar has 18,812, as of the end of the Saturday counting session. That’s 32.56% for Bronson, and 31.68 for Dunbar.

Bronson gained a little over 100 votes, or 5 percent more than Dunbar gained, in the batch that was counted on Saturday.

“We’re happy with the direction that these late ballots are trending. It shows that the majority of Anchorage residents are ready to take our city in a new direction,” Bronson said Saturday.

Bill Falsey made a good third-place showing with 7,826 votes so far.

A total of 59,374 votes have been counted, and another possible 5,000 to 10,000 votes remain to be counted, and some of those may not have yet arrived. The mailed ballot deadline is April 16.

The runoff is set for May 11.

Clerk to voters: Register by April 11 for potential mayoral runoff

5

The Municipal Clerk’s Office is wanting voters to register or update their voter registration before the Sunday, April 11, 2021 deadline to vote in the potential May 11, 2021 mayoral runoff election.  

Although not official, it’s all but certain that retired pilot Dave Bronson will face off against Assemblyman Forrest Dunbar, as voters decide whether they need a new direction, or are content with how things are going in Anchorage.

To be clear, if you are already registered to vote in Anchorage, and if you have not moved, you don’t have to do anything. But if you haven’t registered to vote, you’ll need to do so online at: https://voterregistration.alaska.gov/

If you will be traveling and want to receive your ballot package at a temporary address rather than your regular mailing address, complete the temporary address application on the municipal elections website www.muni.org/2021application and submit it as soon as possible.

The May 11, 2021 mayoral runoff election is a vote at home/vote by mail election. Voters will be mailed their ballots shortly after the April 20 certification of the April 6 election. Vote can be cast through secure drop boxes, an Anchorage Vote Center, or by mail. Specific hours and locations for drop boxes and voting centers can be found at muni.org/elections/AVC

Climate change: Stop punishing the Arctic

15

By PAUL FUHS

It’s become very fashionable lately for politicians and ‘environmental’ groups to advocate against resource development in the Arctic, supposedly in the name of climate change.

This includes cancelling oil and gas leases, discrimination by banks against Arctic oil and gas projects, calls for huge wilderness designations and boycotts against shipping on the Northern Sea Route.

Do these measures make sense and do they do anything to respond to climate change?  The answer is no.  A well-intentioned effort can still be completely misguided.

Think about it:  Shutting down oil and gas production in the Arctic will not result in even one drop less oil being burned. None. It will just be produced somewhere else, like the Alberta tar sands or Venezuelan heavy oil. Is that what we want?

The current estimate of available oil from world proven reserves is 53 years. This does not include unproven reserves or new production technologies. The US International Energy Agency predicts that by 2050, the world will still be 70 percent dependent on fossil fuels. Arctic oil and gas development can help meet this obvious need.

Although the anti Arctic development campaigns claim they are “saving the people of the Arctic,” stopping oil and gas development will only add to the impacts we are already experiencing from climate change by destroying our economies.

Arctic economies, and certainly Alaska’s economy, are highly dependent on resource development. This fact is lost upon the vast urban populations of the U.S. that don’t have any idea where their resources come from. Gasoline just comes out of the pump. Electricity just comes out of the plug in the wall as you turn on your air conditioning.  Products based on mining and timber just magically appear on the shelves of the vast big box stores.

This disconnect is exploited by politicians and by groups pleading for funding from these resource-alienated urban masses. The same goes with the major banks discriminating against the Arctic in their public relations efforts to greenwash themselves. And this while they continue to finance coal and heavy oil production elsewhere.

Likewise, we have the politicians with their virtue signaling decisions like cancelling Arctic oil and gas leases and pipelines across the US.  

The Keystone Pipeline is an excellent case in misguided, but politically expedient, policy. Besides eliminating thousands of working class jobs, cancelling the pipeline will just mean that the oil will be transported by truck or rail, much riskier than a pipeline.  Saving the planet?  Or trading substance for symbols?

In the meantime, the politicians are supporting biomass energy as “green energy.”  This involves cutting down the forests and burning wood pellets which produces more CO2 than coal.

I wonder if our new President Joe Biden and his eager staff have thought about this? If the president really wanted to do something to reduce consumption of oil and gas, he would shut down all the electrical generating plants in his own state of Delaware, which are 70% fossil fuel. (the rest being nuclear).  That would actually do something to reduce CO2 emissions.  

It’s also not going to happen for practical and political reasons. No, it’s much easier to attack the Arctic with our small population.

Climate change is a global consumption problem, not an Arctic production problem.  It’s not the four million people producing oil in the Arctic, it’s the seven billion people in the rest of the world and growing demand, especially in developing nations who strive for the American standard of living. It’s not right to blame them either. These people have rights as well, and we identify with them.

We are not blind to climate issues and deal with them daily as the Arctic warms up.  We support renewable energy when it is practical and that’s not just talk.  We have used our oil money in Alaska to invest heavily in renewable energy sources such as hydroelectric, wind and solar.  We wouldn’t have been able to do that without producing our oil and gas.  We are not sitting on our hands with regard to reducing our own consumption.  Among the states, Alaska is one of the lowest emitters of CO2.

It’s wrong to blame the Arctic and discriminate against us for a problem that is your own. We have the right to continue providing critical resources to our country and the world, while supporting our working class people and our economy.  If you want to look for a solution to climate change, you might want to look into your own backyard.  Or a mirror.

Paul Fuhs is a former mayor of Dutch Harbor, home of The Deadliest Catch, and former commissioner of Commerce and Economic Development for Alaska.