Thursday, May 7, 2026
Home Blog Page 971

Alexander Dolitsky: What is greed? Listen in on an intergenerational conversation

6

By ALEXANDER DOLITSKY

I recently had a conversation with an American in her late 20s about current events in our country—let’s give her the pseudonym “Rebecca,” in order to protect her anonymity.

In the course of our communication, it did not take long for me to recognize Rebeca’s leftist ideology: Christopher Columbus exploited native people during his four voyages to the Caribbean Islands in the late 15th century; the American Constitution was written solely to benefit privileged white people; women in America have been discriminated and suppressed throughout its entire history to the present; America is the mother of  capitalism, exploiting underprivileged people in the entire world; and, finally, the history of America must be rewritten in accordance with a far–left “truth.”  

I patiently listened to her progressive rhetoric and then attempted to explain the subjective and objective causes of historic events in America in their actual contexts, but with little success. Her radical progressive beliefs (brain washing) were already deeply rooted in a woke culture and far-left ideology.

Finally, she asked me, “What is greed and why are wealthy people are so greedy—for example, Jeff Bezos of Amazon?”

“Okay, first, let’s define this concept—greed,” I  proposed to Rebecca. We searched online for a definition and discovered that “…greed is an intense and selfish desire for something, especially wealth, power, or food.” 

“You see, all rich people are greedy—they are selfish, powerful, and unwilling to share their wealth with those who are in need,” Rebecca stated emotionally, with confidence.

“Certainly, this is a very general definition of greed,” I said. “Greed comes in many shapes and colors,” I suggested. “And who said that being rich is a crime. There have been many wealthy American entrepreneurs who shared almost their entire wealth with others: Andrew Carnegie, Henry Ford, John Davison Rockefeller, John Pierpont Morgan—just to name a few. In fact, they were engines of American prosperity,” I continued. 

“Yes, I am familiar with these names, but never learned about them in school, not in great detail,” Rebecca admitted sheepishly.

“Let me share with you my personal experience related to greed in America,” I offered; she was attentive and looked at me with interest.

“Soon after my arrival to the United States in 1978, Jewish Family Service of Philadelphia found employment for me at the Philadelphia Embroidery Inc.—a small embroidery and silk-screening business then located at the 12th and Race Street, in the vicinity of downtown Philadelphia. Fred Tischler and his wife owned this business of about 10 to 12 employees—Fred, his wife and two young designers, Robin and John, worked in the front office, four to six embroiderers and two silk-screeners, including myself and Dave, worked in the back. In short, it was a small mom-and-pop business, resembling America’s utilitarian businesses of the 1930s through 1950s.

“My starting salary was $3.50 per hour. I had no health benefits, no sick leave, and no paid vacation. In 1978, the minimum wage in America was $2.65 per hour. During the 11 months of my employment in the Philadelphia Embroidery, I asked for a raise three times. Each time Mr. Tischler honored my request with a raise of 25 cents per hour.

“I commuted about one hour each way to and from my work place via bus, subway, and a short 10-minute walk. One winter morning I was 15 minutes late for work due to heavy snowfall that caused severe traffic congestion in the city. Fred Tischler and his wife were on vacation in the Bahamas and their daughter, a student of the medical school at the University of Pennsylvania, was substituting for them. On payday, a week later, she issued me a check, deducting $1 for being 15 minutes late on the day of the heavy snowfall.

“Well, how would you describe this treatment of the employee—work discipline or petty greed?” I questioned Rebecca. She only smiled in silent response.

Indeed, Rebecca and like-minded Americans are a product of the neo–Marxist education system and intense indoctrination by far-left activists found in many of our educational institutions today. Unfortunately, so many young people in America are so confused and disoriented that any parent is truly lucky if their child manages to come through the system as an old–fashioned “normal,” preserving strong Judeo–Christian moral values. 

I use the term “old–fashioned” because today’s “normal” is certainly not a desirable outcome.

Alexander B. Dolitsky was born and raised in Kiev in the former Soviet Union. He received an M.A. in history from Kiev Pedagogical Institute, Ukraine, in 1976; an M.A. in anthropology and archaeology from Brown University in 1983; and was enroled in the Ph.D. program in Anthropology at Bryn Mawr College from 1983 to 1985, where he was also a lecturer in the Russian Center. In the U.S.S.R., he was a social studies teacher for three years, and an archaeologist for five years for the Ukranian Academy of Sciences. In 1978, he settled in the United States. Dolitsky visited Alaska for the first time in 1981, while conducting field research for graduate school at Brown. He lived first in Sitka in 1985 and then settled in Juneau in 1986. From 1985 to 1987, he was a U.S. Forest Service archaeologist and social scientist. He was an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Russian Studies at the University of Alaska Southeast from 1985 to 1999; Social Studies Instructor at the Alyeska Central School, Alaska Department of Education from 1988 to 2006; and has been the Director of the Alaska-Siberia Research Center (see www.aksrc.homestead.com) from 1990 to present. He has conducted about 30 field studies in various areas of the former Soviet Union (including Siberia), Central Asia, South America, Eastern Europe and the United States (including Alaska). Dolitsky has been a lecturer on the World Discoverer, Spirit of Oceanus, andClipper Odyssey vessels in the Arctic and sub-Arctic regions. He was the Project Manager for the WWII Alaska-Siberia Lend Lease Memorial, which was erected in Fairbanks in 2006. He has published extensively in the fields of anthropology, history, archaeology, and ethnography. His more recent publications include Fairy Tales and Myths of the Bering Strait Chukchi, Ancient Tales of Kamchatka; Tales and Legends of the Yupik Eskimos of Siberia; Old Russia in Modern America: Russian Old Believers in Alaska; Allies in Wartime: The Alaska-Siberia Airway During WWII; Spirit of the Siberian Tiger: Folktales of the Russian Far East; Living Wisdom of the Far North: Tales and Legends from Chukotka and Alaska; Pipeline to Russia; The Alaska-Siberia Air Route in WWII; and Old Russia in Modern America: Living Traditions of the Russian Old Believers; Ancient Tales of Chukotka, and Ancient Tales of Kamchatka.

A few of Dolitsky’s past MRAK columns:

Read: Neo-Marxism and utopian Socialism in America

Read: Old believers preserving faith in the New World

Read: Duke Ellington and the effects of Cold War in Soviet Union on intellectual curiosity

Read: United we stand, divided we fall with race, ethnicity in America

Read: For American schools to succeed, they need this ingredient

Read: Nationalism in America, Alaska, around the world

Read: The case of the ‘delicious salad’

Read: White privilege is a troubling perspective

Read: Beware of activists who manipulate history for their own agenda

Read: Alaska Day remembrance of Russian transfer

Read: American leftism is true picture of true hypocrisy

Read: History does not repeat itself

Read: The only Ford Mustang in Kiev

Dan Smith: School board majority gets ‘F’

On Dec. 16, 2021, Anchorage School Superintendent Deena Bishop announced, “I am confident that ASD is able to transition to parent-informed masking when we return to school on January 3. It means parents will consider the risk levels in their family and decide for themselves if they want their child attending school wearing a mask.” 

Read Bishop’s letter to parents here.

In other words, masks would now be optional upon return to school after the holiday break.

To those of us under the impression the superintendent has this authority, we politely thanked her and made happy announcements to our children. Perhaps common sense was still alive, as a faint heartbeat was detectable.

But this was not to be the case. The majority of the ASD Board had other plans.

Apparently, the ASD superintendent is only authorized to act in a totalitarian and tyrannical way on this issue. If at any time the superintendent acts in a freedom-minded or liberty-loving manner or attempts to return medical decisions to their rightful parental prerogative, that authority can be rescinded by the board.

At Monday’s School board meeting there was orchestrated public upheaval. This time, it was in favor of keeping our kids mandatorily muzzled. Almost without exception, those testifying to the board in favor of retaining the face diapers for kids projected their own fears and insecurities onto a defenseless youthful population.

There was one articulate counter-argument by board member Dave Donley, who spoke against continuation of the harmful face farce that is mandatory masking. Donley noted that Anchorage is the last vestige of mandatory school masking in Alaska. Everywhere else, people have come to their senses on this issue. It was clear that the only ASD Board member that did his homework was Donley

The other scared and shivering six have no intention of lifting their boot from the mouths and noses of the children in Anchorage. After return from Christmas break, they want at least two more weeks to flatten an already declining Covid case curve.

The paranoia of the six quivering ASD board members is in regards to a problem we do not have. The new Covid variant is a problem to very few indeed. In South Africa, where it was first discovered a month ago, the Omicron variant has already peaked and is on the decline.

Six of seven Anchorage School District board members receive a failing grade. They were asked to show their work but instead showed only their emotions. They do not possess the necessary qualifications to preside over the health and well-being of our children. This is the role of the parent.

Read: Superintendent Deena Bishop’s Dec. 21 message to parents

As a gesture of solidarity with our students and teachers, I suggest the six board members who voted for this policy extension, wear a mask for 6 to 8 hours a day without removing it. For Board member Donley, masking is optional.

Even the progressive, left-leaning Anchorage Assembly brought an end to their misguided mask mandate on Dec. 7. That was not enough for six.

Congratulations to Superintendent Bishop for exposing the root of the problem. The problem we have is fear and six ASD board members who do not want to give up their grasp of tyranny around the throats of Anchorage children. They are paralyzed by fear and unable to think rationally.

There is a growing realization by many that the Anchorage School Board is too big for its britches (with the exception of Donley) and in a practical sense, just too big to respond appropriately to anything that matters and in a timely manner. ASD is the fully loaded tanker ship that takes five miles and 25 minutes to come to a stop.

The Bligh Reef of declining enrollment, ever decreasing test scores and the resulting degradation of our Anchorage school system lies straight ahead.

It is time to consider breaking up the ASD monopoly and creating several smaller school districts in its place. It is also time to consider another option of creating school board seats based on specific districts and doing away with “at large” elections. Either one or both would be fine.

It takes a change of the municipal charter. That will not be easy, but nothing worth doing is easy. The current situation is intolerable.

Dan Smith is a lifelong Alaskan and Anchorage resident.

Jim Crawford: Who owns Alaska? Alaskans, and that’s why we need a Constitutional Convention

By JIM CRAWFORD

Every 10 years, Alaskan voters are presented with a simple but critical question.  Article 13, Sections 3 and 4 of the Alaska Constitution requires that a question to be asked of voters: 

§ 3. Call by Referendum

If during any ten-year period a constitutional convention has not been held, the lieutenant governor shall place on the ballot for the next general election the question: “Shall there be a Constitutional Convention?” If a majority of the votes cast on the question are in the negative, the question need not be placed on the ballot until the end of the next ten-year period. If a majority of the votes cast on the question are in the affirmative, delegates to the convention shall be chosen at the next regular statewide election, unless the legislature provides for the election of the delegates at a special election. The lieutenant governor shall issue the call for the convention. Unless other provisions have been made by law, the call shall conform as nearly as possible to the act calling the Alaska Constitutional Convention of 1955, including, but not limited to, number of members, districts, election and certification of delegates, and submission and ratification of revisions and ordinances. The appropriation provisions of the call shall be self-executing and shall constitute a first claim on the state treasury. [Amended 1970]

§ 4. Powers

Constitutional conventions shall have plenary power to amend or revise the constitution, subject only to ratification by the people. No call for a constitutional convention shall limit these powers of the convention.

Alaska has been governed by special interests for decades. These special interests fund the election of legislators and the subsequent organization of the State Senate and State House. Then they control you.

The people of Alaska should have the last word in Alaska law. 

If you believe, as I do, that the people of Alaska should be the ultimate decider of Alaska law, you might consider joining a growing coalition of voters who see the Constitutional Convention as the only remaining means of returning power to the people to curb the special interests.  

Let’s deal with three issues that the public supports but the court or a majority of a respective legislative house has blocked: 1.  the right to a corruption free government, 2.  the right to determine the amount of your Alaska Permanent Fund dividend and 3. the right to life.

The most important issue that Alaskan’s must change is the corruption of our judicial appointees through the Alaska Judicial Council. The Alaska Judicial Council is governed by seven members, four attorneys and three non-attorney members. The four attorney members dictate whom the governor can appoint to their list of “qualified nominees”.  A member of the Judicial Council should not be practicing law in front a judge they appointed. The Judicial Council should exclude those with a conflict of interest. For instance, excluding attorneys who could try a case after appointing their candidate.

The voters can correct this only through a Constitutional Convention.   

The right to determine the dividend of the Alaska Permanent Fund must be resolved by a vote of the people. The Legislature has proved through Special Session after Special Session that it cannot come up with a dividend policy that is fair, consistent and sustainable.   Convention delegates can and will.   

The right to life can be on the ballot in Alaska in 2024. The U. S. Supreme Court could shortly rule that Alaskans, instead of the federal government or courts, can determine the length of a baby’s in utero life. Will Alaskans continue to be bound by an elusive mandate that the right to privacy and reproductive rights authorizes the taking of innocent life? The only way for the people to overrule that precedent is through a Constitutional Convention.  Exempting babies with a beating heart could be passed by a majority of Alaskans.    

Each of these examples could be added or excluded by elected members of the upcoming Constitutional Convention as outlined in the Alaska Constitution. The original authors provided the path to restrain out-of-control, special interests that practice conflicts of interests by controlling Alaska law.  

Does Alaska have the Constitution it deserves?  Are there glaring conflicts in need of correction?  Are there issues that have been blocked by special interests who choose their own law above the public good?  

The National Education Association opposes your right to a Constitution Convention.  And we know why, the budget they hold hostage each year.  

I’ve been a registered voter in Alaska since I turned 18 in 1966. I’ve opposed a Constitutional Convention each time since then. But I will vote for the Convention in 2022. Why? Because there is no other path that gives the control of government back to Alaskan citizens. The voters of Alaska are smart and can be trusted to study the issues prior to a vote. Each Alaskan will have the opportunity to weigh in on issues they feel are important. The power will be back where it belongs, with the people.

Those who oppose the Constitution Convention appoint judges to put their thumb on the scales of justice, scoff at the public’s right to set the dividend of the Alaska Permanent Fund and campaign with fear to advocate taking a baby’s innocent human life.      

A Constitutional Convention is an opportunity to take back our government, to reclaim for the people good public policy in Alaska. We have a bright future if we do not forfeit our rights to a clean government, our right to healthy babies and our right to determine our earnings through our dividends. 

Each of those three rights share a common ancestry. Each has been controlled for decades by special interests. A majority of Alaskans can change that.     

Jim Crawford is a third-generation Alaskan entrepreneur who resides in Anchorage with his editor and bride of 38 years, Terri. Capital Alaska LLC is a statewide commercial lender which analyses and may sponsor projects of sustained economic growth for the Alaskan economy. Mr. Crawford, known as the Permanent Fund Defender, was a member of the Investment Advisory Committee, appointed by Governor Hammond to plan and execute the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation

Covid math: Pandemic policy led to decline in algebra completion in Anchorage schools

By DAVID BOYLE

The Anchorage School District has been wrestling with the math program for decades. Under former School Superintendent Carol Comeau, the district implemented the highly conceptual “Every Day Math” (EDM) program, which focused on high-level math concepts as opposed to foundational math such as Saxon Math. 

Read: Is Every Day Math the worst math program ever?

This EDM program was not a good fit for most of the students, as it was meant for those who would go on to college.

Additionally, the majority of teachers didn’t like the program, according to a 2011 audit by the Council of Great City Schools. The customers — parents and students — were not even asked their opinions.

At its Dec. 20 school board meeting, the board was presented with the status of algebra II as part of the new College, Career and Life Ready standards. Algebra II is said to be the best indicator to ensure college success.  The ASD is focusing on improving the successful completion of algebra II to reduce the math remediation of freshmen at the university system, which is more than 60 percent. 

The most recent PEAKS standards show only 37 percent of all Anchorage students are proficient at math and 37 percent of ninth graders are proficient at math.  It appears as if some foundational math is lacking.  

The below chart shows a downward trend of students successfully completing Algebra II:

This group of students represents the percentage of all grade 9-12 students, not just those taking algebra II. There is a significant drop in completion rates between the years 2018-19 and 2019-20. A 4.3 percentage drop is nearly 10 percent. 

The low point in 2020-2021 shows the impact of distance learning due to the pandemic and school closures. 

The interesting part is that there is a trend in the decline in the number of students taking algebra II. From 2018-19 to 2020-21 there is a drop of 715 students.  

This may be attributed to the pandemic or the fact that students may be ill-prepared with earlier math and fear they will fail at algebra II.  It’s also possible students believe they don’t need this math to succeed in life.

This chart shows a breakout of students according to race/ethnic group, English language learners, special education, economic status, and type of school attended:

The most important column here is the “% Students Enrolled,” because that determines the excellent “Completion Rate of students Enrolled in Algebra II” column.  The overall 90.21% of students completing algebra II only considers those who are enrolled in the course. If they enroll in the class, they typically complete it.  

This chart also shows that the Alternative schools far outpace the neighborhood (Comprehensive) and charter schools. These alternative schools are Alaska Middle College, King Tech High School, Polaris, and Steller Secondary School. Most of the students in these schools are college-bound. 

The school board didn’t ask any questions regarding the downward trend in completion rates.

Instead, the left-dominated board focused on “equity “in math programs regarding minority students, those students who are in the 63% “not proficient” in math as shown in the state’s PEAKS assessment. 

Jamie Allard: My Christmas wish is that we defend our freedoms and treasure our humanity

By JAMIE ALLARD

With this Christmas season upon us, let us pause and reflect on our moments of joy and growth from the past year: Moments of victory, and moments challenging our beliefs.

Let us remember those who are grieving, those who are lonely or suffering, and those who are far from home serving our country.

As we gather around our dinner tables with precious loved ones, let us take a moment to appreciate our freedoms.  When we gather and celebrate holidays let us give thanks for all we cherish. 

The past two years have shown us our freedom is fragile. Across the country and around the world, we’ve seen liberty sacrificed for perceived safety, and rights stripped by governments with no regard to cost or consequence. Our country must face reality;  in the hands of a tyrannical government, our freedom to celebrate Christmas, Hanukkah, or Kwanzaa can be taken away.

Our prosperity rests on our freedom to work, worship, gather, create, and pursue happiness. We thrive as a nation because we are free. You do not need permission to hug your mom, or invite a friend over to dinner. Those are choices we make for ourselves.

We never know what tomorrow holds, but we do know precious moments lost cannot be recovered with all the money in print. And these holiday moments we spend together with our families are often the most precious of all. Therefore, let us treasure our humanity and stay vigilant in our watch. 

So yes, celebrate and embrace the holiday cheer! Embrace each other and lend a neighbor a hand. Thank a service member or a first responder for their service. Pass along some random kindness and savor the warmth of Christmas feasts.

Cherish the generosity and faith that makes this season bright. And above all, remember it is love that makes us truly free. 

I wish you peace and joy this season and a very Merry Christmas!

Jamie Allard is Anchorage Assemblywoman for Chugiak/Eagle River and is a candidate for state House.

What a mess! Bethel has rain, rain, rain, with delayed flights, stranded passengers

4

Bethel was -15 degrees at the beginning of December, and the ground and Kuskokwim River is frozen solid. Now, with a quarter inch of rain having fallen over the past day, the rain has nowhere to go except on top of the snow and ice, making conditions in Western Alaska a mess. Planes from Anchorage are on delay, with 800-foot ceilings and an waterlogged, icy Bethel runway.

It looks like a sloppy Christmas is ahead.

“Christmas travel, medical travel, mail, medicines, groceries — everything comes in by air,” said Steve Strait, of KEDI radio, which broadcasts in Western Alaska. Dillingham is facing similar conditions.

“Forget about Christmas shopping. Christmas Eve forecast is for a half inch of rain, which can’t go into the frozen soil and is just running all over the ice. It’s back to snow machines. And this afternoon they’re looking at 35 mile per hour winds and right now an 800-foot ceiling,” he said.

According to KYUK radio, the inclement weather in recent days has stranded travelers in Bethel. In response, the Yukon-Kuskokwim Health Corporation created a temporary shelter to house some of them over the weekend. As of Dec. 21, patients who had not been able to fly home remained in at YKHC.

YKHC Public Information Officer Mary Horgan said that dozens of people were in Bethel for medical appointments when the stormy weather struck. Other people became stuck in Bethel who were traveling back to villages from appointments in Anchorage, according to KYUK.

Alaska Airlines Fight 43 from Anchorage to Bethel was delayed by several hours today.

Christmas miracle? Court orders Anchorage to not enforce radical ordinance forcing women’s shelters to take in men

In a win for faith-based organizations, a federal judge issued an order Monday saying the Municipality of Anchorage cannot enforce a city ordinance that would force a faith-based women’s shelter to admit males and let them sleep alongside women who have suffered physical and sexual abuse.

Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys represent the Downtown Hope Center in Downtown Hope Center v. Municipality of Anchorage II.

U.S. District Court Judge Sharon Gleason found that Downtown Hope Center does not constitute a place of “public accommodation” and therefore is not subject to a city ordinance that threatened the shelter with fines and penalties for following its religious beliefs and serving women in need.

“Vulnerable women deserve a safe place to stay overnight, and we’re pleased that they can sleep soundly, at least for the time being, due to the court’s order,” said ADF Senior Counsel Kate Anderson. “Downtown Hope Center serves everyone, but its overnight women’s shelter exists to provide a safe place for women, many of whom have survived sex trafficking, rape, or domestic violence at the hands of men. This is the second time Anchorage officials have targeted the center for operating according to its religious beliefs and serving the city’s homeless population. We hope the court’s order puts an end to this.”

In 2018, Downtown Hope Center filed a federal lawsuit against the city after the shelter referred an inebriated and injured man to a hospital to get the care he needed and paid for his taxi ride there. The man later filed a complaint with the Anchorage Equal Rights Commission alleging the center didn’t let him stay at the shelter, where he would have been sleeping right next to homeless women—many of whom were victims of physical and sexual abuse. The city then chose to pursue the complaint against the center, prompting ADF attorneys to file suit on the center’s behalf.

The city eventually dropped the complaint, and both the city and the center agreed to make the court’s temporary order against the city permanent.

But since the city’s first loss in federal court, the radicalized Anchorage Assembly amended the city ordinance in an attempt to find a way around the court’s ruling, once again targeting Downtown Hope Center and trying to force it to let males sleep next to homeless women.

“Faith-based nonprofits should be free to serve consistently with their faith without fear of unjust government punishment. This is especially true for ministries that help homeless women who have suffered sexual abuse or domestic violence,” said ADF Senior Counsel Ryan Tucker, director of ADF’s Center for Christian Ministries. “Because no woman should be forced to sleep or disrobe next to a man, we are pleased the court has allowed Downtown Hope Center to continue protecting women and operating according to its religious beliefs.”

Sonja Redmond, one of nearly 3,500 attorneys allied with ADF, is serving as local counsel for Downtown Hope Center.

Learn more about ADF at this link.

Recall: Tanana Chiefs board votes to remove PJ Simon from chair of Native nonprofit

10

Many recalls have failed in Alaska over the past two years. The governor and two sitting Anchorage Assembly members have survived attempts on their leadership.

But the Tanana Chiefs Conference board of directors voted last week to recall PJ Simon from his position as chief and chairman at the Native nonprofit organization. This one worked.

He had served for a little more than a year for the organization that has a mission of advancing Tribal self-determination and enhancing regional Native unity through health care and social services. Other services include tribal development services, management of natural resources, public safety, community planning, and transportation. No reason was made public for the recall.

The full board of Tanana Chiefs Conference met at the Westmark Hotel on Dec. 14. The motion passed with 22 of 33 members voting in favor of the recall. Chief Financial Officer Brian Ridley will service as acting chief and chairman until the March meeting when the tribes will hold a special election.

In October, tribal members began openly questioning the operation of the organization. Over the following weeks, other complaints and grievances were aired in private meetings with the board; none has been made public.

Simon was born in Tanana and was raised in the Village of Allakaket by parents Pollack Sr. and Julia Simon. He finished high school in Fairbanks, moved to Galena, and became a hunting guide. Later her returned to Allakaket to care for his parents, and he became chief of the village. He served on the board of Doyon from 2014 through 2020.

Tanana Chiefs Conference includes 41 tribal entities and 20,000 tribal members.

Sen. Ted Cruz and 46 other lawmakers join vax lawsuit with Navy SEALs v. Joe Biden

Nine U.S. senators, including Ted Cruz (R-Texas), Rick Scott (R-Fla.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), James Lankford (R-Okla.), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), Mike Braun (R-Ind.), and Roger Marshall (R-Kan.), along with 38 members of the House of Representatives, filed an amicus brief in U.S. Navy Seals v. Biden.

The 38 House Republicans were led by Mike Johnson of Louisiana, the House Republican Conference chair.

The lawsuit originated from 26 Navy SEALs and other Navy service members with sincere religious objections to receiving the Covid-19 vaccine are challenging the president’s vaccine mandate for the Navy.

The service members argue that both the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the First Amendment require the federal government to allow exemptions for their sincerely held religious beliefs, especially since they are willing to take other precautionary measures to prevent the spread of Covid-19 in lieu of vaccination and the Navy is already allowing medical exemptions.

Rep. Laddie Shaw, a member of the Alaska House of Representatives is a retired Navy SEAL, the only one in elected office in Alaska. He supports the lawsuit.

Rep. Laddie Shaw speaks to military members in November.

“I’m absolutely on board with that,” Shaw said. “I’m so against mandates. It costs a quarter million to put a Navy SEAL through a year of training. To go through all that hell, then get told they have to get a jab for something that has a 99 plus percent survival rate?”

The SEALs are some of the most fit people on the planet, with high cardiovascular capacity and low body mass index. They would not typically be in the “comorbidity” group.

“My class started with 112 and ended up with 18 because not enough people can do push-ups all day,” Shaw said.

In the amicus brief, the lawmakers wrote:

“Plaintiffs’ religious liberty and the government’s asserted interest in protecting our service members from COVID-19 need not be in conflict, especially where, as here, the individuals seeking an exemption are willing to adopt non-vaccination measures to protect themselves and others from the spread of COVID-19. They are only in conflict here because Defendants refuse to accommodate Plaintiffs’ religious objections even as they accommodate those who will not receive the vaccine for non-religious reasons. This violates RFRA by substantially burdening Plaintiffs’ religious beliefs without a compelling reason, and violates the First Amendment’s guarantee that government not discriminate against religion.”

“Defendants’ policies mandating that Plaintiffs be vaccinated in violation of their sincerely held religious beliefs does not come close to satisfying the strictest scrutiny Congress demands in RFRA. Defendants’ vaccine mandate forces Plaintiffs—individuals who have devoted their lives to the protection of the country—to choose between following their sincerely held religious convictions and effectively being discharged, losing their calling, and destroying their financial well-being.”

“Religious freedom is fundamental to every American’s liberty, but we have seen in recent years increasing hostility among elected and appointed government officials towards those who seek to exercise that freedom. . . . That same hostility to religion is on display with Defendants’ mandate. Defendants could easily accommodate Plaintiffs and similarly situated religious individuals given that Defendants are already accommodating individuals with medical issues or who received placebos in clinical trials. They have simply chosen not to do so.”

“[T]he impact on the military and our national security strongly counsels in favor of granting a preliminary injunction. The mandate is sidelining the deployment of soldiers on whose service our country relies. If this mandate (as currently being applied or threatened) is not enjoined, these Plaintiffs cannot fulfill their pledge to serve and defend our country, even though, based upon their training and experience, these Plaintiffs, as well as others similarly situated, are some of our most qualified, equipped, and fearless soldiers. Our men and women in uniform have fought to protect the freedoms that every American, regardless of belief, enjoys. Now they ask this Court to protect their religious freedom from encroachment by the very government they have sworn to protect with their lives.”

Established by President John F. Kennedy in 1962, the Navy SEALs are a nimble, elite maritime military force suited for all aspects of unconventional warfare. They:

  • Conduct insertions and extractions by sea, air or land to accomplish covert, Special Warfare/Special Operations missions
  • Capture high-value enemy personnel and terrorists around the world
  • Collect information and intelligence through special reconnaissance missions
  • Carry out small-unit, direct-action missions against military targets
  • Perform underwater reconnaissance and the demolition of natural or man-made obstacles prior to amphibious landings