Wednesday, November 5, 2025
Home Blog Page 606

Nordstrom closes two stores in downtown San Francisco

It’s tough being a retailer in San Francisco, what with all the druggies and homeless wandering around and defecating in your entry.

Nordstrom, based in Seattle, has thrown in the towel and joined the ranks of companies that are leaving or have left downtown in the city by the bay. Both of the store’s locations will close; Nordstrom is politely saying it’s because of “the dynamics of the downtown San Francisco market have changed dramatically over the past several years, impacting customer foot traffic to our stores and our ability to operate successfully.”

Nordstrom closed its Anchorage store in the fall of 2019, as the economy declined under the leadership of former Mayor Ethan Berkowitz and his community development appointee Andrew Halcro.

Nordstrom and its sister brand Nordstrom Rack will close 15 stores across the U.S. and Canada this year, with 13 closing in Canada. The only two stores in the USA that are closing are in San Francisco.

The Canadian stores closing are in Calgary, Edmonton, Langley, Ottawa (2 stores), Toronto (5 stores) and Vancouver.

Also leaving downtown San Francisco is T-Mobile and Saks, both leaving Union Square. Whole Foods announced in April it will be closing its San Francisco location just a year after it opened, due to employee safety concerns. Walgreens, CVS, and Amazon are also leaving.

Downing: Golden Fleece Award for a $395K electric school bus in Wrangell

By SUZANNE DOWNING

Washington, D.C. could use another fiscal hawk like the late Sen. William Proxmire of Wisconsin.

During his Senate career from 1957 to 1988, Proxmire instituted a regular Golden Fleece Award, with which he mocked “the biggest, most ridiculous or most ironic example of government spending.”

Among his infamous recipients was the Department of Justice, receiving the award for conducting a study on why prisoners desire to escape. 

Another honoree was the U.S. Postal Service, spending $4 million on an ad campaign urging Americans to write more letters.

In today’s government borrow-and-spend climate, Proxmire would find an embarrassment of riches for his satirical accolades. Here’s one that would surely join the ranks:

In the hardy Southeast fishing, timber, and tourism town of Wrangell, the school district had the idea to apply for a federal grant for a new electric school bus. With the Environmental Protection Agency distributing nearly $1 billion in these electric school bus grants last year, it was raining money, so why not one for a hamlet in the rain forest?

In October, the Biden Administration awarded $395,000 to Wrangell for the purchase of the electric bus, intended to expedite the transition to zero-emission vehicles and foster “cleaner air in schools and neighboring communities.” 

Don’t get me wrong — I love Wrangell. It’s a great town and I love the people. But most students in this Alaska town can walk to school or catch a ride with an older sibling or parent who works at the school.

Wrangell, with its 2,100 souls and only about 25 miles of road, has a school system serving 263 students — at most — and two school buses. The number of students is falling so fast that the district is seriously considering combining two of the three schools into one. And there are no neighboring communities in Wrangell, unless you get on a ferry or a plane.

As for the clean air aspect, Wrangell boasts some of the cleanest air in America. It’s situated in the middle of the nation’s largest national forest, the Tongass, which is the size of Virginia yet has a population of only 70,000 across its numerous islands and archipelagos. Between the millions of carbon-capturing trees and millions of acres of carbon-absorbing ocean, Wrangell is in a rainforest that is already on hydro power. It’s not belching much of anything into the air, which is swept clean by ocean breezes.

But somehow Wrangell, in spite of its voters’ overwhelming preference for President Donald Trump in 2016 and 2020, won a grant from the Biden Administration. 

Its success was due to the fact that more northern communities in Alaska can’t use electric buses, as their batteries just don’t last in the cold winters, and the last thing communities need is to have a bus full of children break down in sub-zero blizzards. For most of Alaska, electric vehicles don’t make sense.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski was euphoric. After all, Wrangell is where her father, former Sen. Frank Murkowski, and his wife, Nancy, live. Lisa brought home the bacon.

“Congratulations to the Wrangell School District for being a recipient of the EPA’s Clean School Bus Program, established by the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. Wrangell’s new electric school bus will enhance the district’s ability to operate efficient and safe bus routes. I am thrilled to witness Alaskan communities reaping the benefits of my bipartisan infrastructure law,” she said in a statement.

The projected cost of the new electric bus itself is $375,000, with an additional $20,000 designated for a charging station. 

Thus, the nearly $400,000 to transport even half of those 263 students pencils out to $1,500 per student. That $400,000 amounts to 8% of the district’s annual school district’s $5 million operating budget for a bus that may run 10 hours a week.

This alone would qualify it for Proximire’s Golden Fleece Award, although “Golden Fleet” might also be appropriate.

But then, an unexpected hurdle arose: The EPA grant stipulates that the bus company must dispose of one of its diesel-fueled buses. Not a mere sale or decommissioning of the bus, but complete destruction was required.

Taylor Transportation, the company that has the bus contract in Wrangell, questioned the wisdom of destroying a perfectly functional school bus from its fleet.

With the clock ticking, the district approached the EPA with a proposal: Could Wrangell purchase a bus in another jurisdiction, destroy it, present evidence of its destruction to the federal agency, and subsequently qualify for the grant for the new electric bus?

The EPA saw no apparent obstacles to this unconventional workaround.

For the past few weeks, Wrangell scoured other states for a bus that fit EPA’s criteria, which includes that the bus must have served as a functional student transporter for the last two years. 

In other words, the bus Wrangell buys and destroys cannot be the dilapidated remnants of a Burning Man excursion.

In addition, not just any method of destruction will suffice. The EPA has regulations governing the disabling of a diesel school bus—no cliffs can be involved, for instance.

Sen. Proxmire would revel in the circus that is this wasteful endeavor.

Within the Infrastructure Bill, bizarre trinkets like this abound for every community across America, enough to keep Golden Fleece Awards going for years.

Regardless of party, we need more fiscal hawks like Proxmires and fewer spendthrift Murkowskis in the Senate. 

We need senators who will put their foot down on wasteful spending, not put their foot on the pedal for borrowing against the futures of our children.

Suzanne Downing is publisher of Must Read Alaska. Credit for original reporting on this grant to KTSK.

Sackett vs EPA: Supreme Court sides with property owners on water rights

The U.S. Supreme Court handed down a landmark ruling on Thursday that significantly curtails the ability of the Environmental Protection Agency to expand its authority over private property under the Clean Water Act.

The case, Sackett v. EPA, centered around property owners Mike and Chantell Sackett’s battle against the agency’s claim that their land near Priest Lake in Idaho fell under the jurisdiction of “Waters of the United States,” effectively designating the federal government as the de facto owner.

The Sacketts’ legal ordeal began 15 years ago when they started construction on their home site, only to be met with a stop-work order from the EPA. The agency argued that their property is classified as wetland and fed into a non-navigable creek, which eventually flowed into Priest Lake. That made it a “Waters of the United States” jurisdiction.

The lot that the Sackett own is surrounded by others that have been developed into a residential neighborhood. Only theirs was singled out by the EPA.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit had previously ruled in favor of the EPA, but after months of deliberation, the Supreme Court reversed the decision, narrowing the EPA’s authority.

Writing for the majority, Justice Sam Alito emphasized the need for a clear rule regarding what constitutes wetlands and waters covered by the federal government under the “interstate commerce” clause.

The court clarified that “waters” is understood by the public to mean to permanent bodies of water, excluding temporary ponds, ditches, or puddles. Wetlands separate from traditional bodies of water are deemed non-covered, while those connected to permanent waters may still be considered “waters of the United States.” For example, marshes adjacent to lakes or flowing waters, with a continuous surface connection, may fall under federal jurisdiction.

The ruling carries significant implications for property owners nationwide, as it protects them from potential “severe criminal sanctions for even negligent violations” of the Clean Water Act.

Justice Clarence Thomas, in a concurring opinion joined by Justice Neil Gorsuch, argued that the :curbs a serious expansion of federal authority that has simultaneously degraded States’ authority and diverted the Federal Government from its important role as guarantor of the Nation’s great commercial highways into something resembling ‘a local zoning board.’”

Four justices — Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh, and Ketanji Brown Jackson — agreed the Sacketts’ property is not covered by the Clean Water Act but disagreed with the majority’s reasoning.

Justice Kavanaugh, who wrote the dissenting opinion for the four, said the narrower test established by the majority may leave some previously regulated adjacent wetlands unprotected, which could impact water quality and flood control efforts.

Damien Schiff of the Pacific Legal Foundation, who represented the Sacketts, called the ruling a victory for property owners, the rule of law, and the constitutional separation of powers.

Schiff said the decision restores the Clean Water Act to its original limits, providing clearer guidelines for federal regulators and ensuring fairness and consistency.

“The Court made the right call in limiting federal jurisdiction over wetlands and placing decision-making power back in the hands of States,” said Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy. “This ruling stands to promote the kind of responsible development my Administration is working to bring to Alaska.”

“The State of Alaska has long advocated for limiting the expansion of the definition of WOTUS. Alaska argued to the Supreme Court in a friend-of-the-court brief that an expansive WOTUS definition exceeded the authority granted to the federal agencies under the Clean Water Act. In addition, the State recently urged exemptions for unique types of wetlands such as permafrost in comments it submitted last year as part of EPA’s WOTUS rulemaking. Earlier this year, Alaska and 23 other States won a preliminary injunction of the EPA’s revised WOTUS definition,” the Office of the Governor of Alaska wrote.

Earthjustice, which filed an amicus brief to support the federal government’s position, was displeased:

“The Sackett decision undoes a half-century of progress generated by the Clean Water Act. More than 118 million acres of formerly protected wetlands now face an existential threat from polluters and developers,” said Sam Sankar, senior vice president of Programs at Earthjustice.

“This decision is the culmination of industry’s decades-long push to get conservative courts to do what Congress refused to do. The Court’s decision to deregulate wetlands will hurt everyone living in the United States. Earthjustice will continue to fight to protect our waters to ensure the health of communities and ecosystems for decades to come,” Sanker said.

Peltola demands Alaska power associations pay reparations to Village of Eklutna for water

A letter from Rep. Mary Peltola to the boards of Matanuska Electric Association and Chugach Electric Association makes demands on behalf of the Village of Eklutna.

The demands are for an unstated amount of money and demands that the Eklutna dam be torn down and/or that the Village of Eklutna be paid for the water that she claims belongs to the village.

Peltola is demanding “favored status,” or “equal party status” for the village. The letter references a 1991 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Agreement, which can be seen here.

The letter was referenced in open session in the first board meeting after the board election for Chugach Electric Association, which ended May 19. Peltola’s letter was not included in the board meeting packet, however, but all members had a copy of the letter.

The board took the matter into executive session because it plans to have a joint response with Matanuska Electric Association that it wanted to discuss. (The letter is embedded below, but may not be visible on a smart phone.)

The letter, received May 18, was sent to CEA just as the board election was ending. The electric association board majority was taken over by the environmental industry, led by the Alaska Center for the Environment, and this week immediately elected a new board chair, Sam Cason. Former chairwoman Bettina Chastain was rolled as chair by the new environmental group that has seized control of the association, which is now the only power company in Anchorage, after buying Municipal Light and Power from the city of Anchorage of $972.8 million in 2019, after voters approved the sale in 2018. It is now a monopoly.

The Anchorage Assembly has established government-to-government relations with the Village of Eklutka which sits on the outskirts of Anchorage. The village estimates its population as 70.

Target, Bud Light, now North Face? Transgender and drag queen marketing leading to stocks slipping

North Face, the Denver clothing company founded in 1966 to supply hardcore mountain climbers, has joined the hardcore transgender marketing trend.

In advance of Pride Month, the company rolled out a video ad featuring a grotesquely styled man in women’s apparel, makeup, and hair — something that was off-brand for the rugged look for which the company was once known.

In the commercial, drag queen ‘Pattie Gonia’ [a reference to competitor Patagonia] tells the viewers, “come out… in nature with us!” and says he is a “real life homosexual.”

He doesn’t look ready for nature.

Shares of North Face’s parent company, VF Corp, dropped sharply on Wednesday, the day after the “come out” pride ad was rolled out.

The company has an entire line of rainbow clothing in its online catalog.

Similarly taking stock hits are retailer giant Target, which has an in-your-face entryway display marketing gay and transgender apparel, accessories, confectionaries, and toys for all ages. Target stock dropped 2.84% on Thursday, and slid over 10% in the past five days.

Target has changed its displays in some southern states after the heavy gay-trans marketing at front entryways drew strong objections from customers, but in Anchorage, the displays are still the first thing people see when they come in the door.

Anheuser-Busch stock continues to suffer, even as the beer-drinking months approach. After the company identified Bud Light as a transgender favorite, it’s having a hard time giving away the product, and although the company stock is holding steady for the year, it’s taken a huge hit since it rolled out its Dylan Mulvaney transgender campaign in April.

According to MarketBeat, shares of Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV have been given a consensus rating of “hold” by the 14 brokerages covering the company. Two investment analysts rated the stock with a sell, four have assigned a hold, and six have given a buy recommendation to the company. The average 12-month target price among brokers that have issued ratings on the stock in the last year is $64.60. Currently, the price on Thursday midday was $56.81.

Tim Barto: The passion of the transgender movement

By TIM BARTO

Transgenderism is now at the forefront of the nation’s consciousness, or at least it’s in the forefront of the nation’s news cycle.

Perhaps more appropriately, it’s at the forefront of a movement by the radical left to overthrow the foundational mores of our country and western civilization as a whole.

Many of us have quit using phrases such as “How much worse can it get?” or “Now I’ve heard it all,” because the responses we keep getting back are, respectively, “Much worse,” and “No you haven’t.”

Like the old baseball adage that you should not speak out loud about a pitcher throwing a no-hitter, expressing thoughts that we’ve reached the limits of bizarreness may bring about the automatic jinx of the next opposing batter getting a base hit. In the case of our changing mores, it’s the next heretofore unbelievable action by the transgender movement. 

Consider the recent story of the Los Angeles Dodgers baseball organization inviting, uninviting, then re-inviting the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence to the team’s LGBTQ+ Pride event.

Setting aside the very valid argument that Major League Baseball should be about promoting the game of baseball instead of alienating their historical fanbase and making it uncomfortable for most parents to take their children to see a ballgame, the Dodgers’ front office felt such immense pressure from the rainbow mob that they not only re-invited but apologized to a group that mocks not just Catholic nuns but all of Christianity.

At first glance, it may seem that the Dodgers did not learn from the horrendous public relations mistakes made by Anheuser-Busch when its Bud Light marketing team openly endorsed biological-male-turned-teenage-girl-impersonator Dylan Mulvaney.

However, maybe the Dodgers did learn something. The Anheuser-Busch/Bud Light (AB/BL) folks realized they insulted their consumer base – essentially, sports-watching men from middle America, whom they could justifiably expect would soon abandon their boycott, just as they did with Nike and the National Football League.

An acknowledgment by AB/BL of the mistake would likely have satiated a crowd that essentially just wants an inexpensive light beer without any attached social statements or alternative lifestyles messaging.

But the AB/BL team also realized that such an apology would generate an alternate firestorm from the transgender crowd, and that would be an even greater fiasco. 

Why? Because the alphabet appropriator base is unashamed and unabashed. They are convinced their side is correct, and any deviation from their point of view amounts to intolerable intolerance. It’s an angry, misguided bunch, but they are extraordinarily passionate about their positions: transwomen are women; gender is a social construct; young children can determine if they are a boy or girl; sex transition surgery is a right that should be paid for by the collective taxpayers; drag queen story hour is harmless fun.

Just a few short years ago, these positions would have been deemed so outrageous they would not have received any serious dialogue or debate, but times have changed, and done so at an incredibly fast pace.

President Bill Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996. Hillary Clinton spoke out against gay marriage, as did President Obama, although they’ve both changed their positions (“evolved,” they called them) in the 2012-2014 time period.

Feminists argued for and staunchly defended Title IX, the federal law that insured equal opportunity for girls and women to compete in sports, but today many feminists are supporting the inclusion of biological males in female sports competitions. 

On a more local level, during the recently ended 2023 legislative session, the testimonials against Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s parental rights legislation (SB96) and for Senator Gray-Jackson’s sex education bill (SB43) included far more people from the alternative lifestyle crowd than the traditional majority. 

The fanaticism of the LGBT+ movement, and the transgender part of that in particular, is fueled by support from the teachers’ unions, public school systems, government institutions, major media outlets, and the entertainment industry:

  • Sports network ESPN honored biological male swimmer Lia Thomas during Women’s History Month for Thomas’ participation as a female college swimmer
  • President Biden appointed biological male Rachel Levine to the rank of four-star Admiral in the Public Health Service. USA Today went on to honor Levine as one of their Women of the Year
  • Sam Brinton, a dress-stealing-and-wearing biological male, was appointed by President Biden as a Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Department of Energy
  • The state of Michigan honored transgender male Owen Bondono as its Teacher of the Year in 2020
  • Time magazine selected transgender actor Michaela Jae Rodriguez as one of its Women of the Year in 2022
  • Sports Illustrated magazine selected transgender singer Kim Petras, a biological male, as one of their cover models for their 2023 swimsuit edition. 

So, is the transgender movement a phase that will go the way of Occupy Wall Street and BLM? Does it have legs enough that 20 years from now we will look upon it as just another transition that changed society forever, or will the pendulum begin to swing in the other direction? 

Tim Barto is a biological male who has been married to the same woman for 33 years. Together they have five children. He’s also vice president of Alaska Family Council, and he is unable to answer the two questions that ended this column.

Win Gruening: How to make Juneau less affordable

By WIN GRUENING

As concern mounted among Juneau citizenry over the community’s rising cost of living, City Manager Rorie Watt initially recommended a lower property tax millage rate of 10.28 for next year’s budget that “generates only enough property tax to pay CBJ general governmental costs after consideration of a $1 million lapse.”

This statement ignores two relevant realities: The City and Borough of Juneau Assembly has earmarked or spent nearly $46 million in public funds to date for the planned construction of two government buildings, rejected by voters, which are estimated to cost around $120 million.

Secondly, property tax assessments this year are rising an average of 16% (though some residents report increases of up to 40%), which negates any purported “reduction” in property taxes by the Assembly.

It is disingenuous to suggest that Juneau’s property taxes cannot be reduced further because “general governmental costs” must be covered after tax revenues have been diverted to discretionary projects. Particularly, when those projects have failed to garner widespread community support and have been turned down by voters. 

 After discussion, the Juneau Assembly approved setting the city’s property tax rate at 10.16. This is, at best, an unconvincing effort to divert attention from an Assembly spending spree that denies taxpayers the relief they need.

The proposed rate reduction is a paltry 3.8% decrease from 2022 when Juneau’s median tax assessed home value had already risen to $527,000 — a 23% increase since 2020. The increase in assessed values without a corresponding reduction in the millage rate translates directly into a higher tax bill for property owners. If viewed honestly, escalating property values over the last two years will cost the average homeowner over $1,000 more in tax annually while the Assembly’s proposed millage rate “reduction” only pares it back a measly $200.

While Juneau’s cost of living continues to outpace larger urban areas in Alaska, city leaders seem determined to drive it even higher with their tax-and-spend appetites. 

Prioritizing the wants of city leaders over the needs of Juneau taxpayers will not expand the community’s tax base which would reduce Juneauites’ individual tax burden by spreading it among more homeowners and businesses.  Indeed, Juneau’s demographics suggest the opposite occurring. The city population is stagnant and school enrollment continues to plummet, placing even more pressure on the municipal budget.

Higher commercial property vacancies in Juneau signal that property owners will be burdened even further. One only needs to roam through the State Office Building to see the empty offices to realize that this will eventually translate to even more vacancies in commercial real estate.

Property owners will also be unavoidably saddled with higher tax bills as a growing number of buildings in Juneau have been purchased by tax-exempt entities and these properties, wholly, or in part, will be removed from the tax rolls, shrinking the tax base even further.

It’s irresponsible to erect new government buildings in this environment and force property taxes even higher to pay for them, without approval by voters of their full cost including any past unapproved appropriations. 

The precipitous rise in property taxes added to other unwarranted Assembly expenditures, is contributing to next year’s record-setting budget, the largest in Juneau’s history.

For example, the Assembly recently made vote-by-mail city elections permanent though the cost to conduct them is significantly higher than conventional in-person elections.  Passed without voter approval, vote-by-mail fails to increase voter turnout, prolongs final election results, and makes fraud and ballot harvesting practices more likely.

While the Assembly continues to promote their “#1 goal of affordable housing,” their actions taken recently directly work against accomplishing that goal.  An unnecessarily high millage rate drives up property taxes and thereby the cost of housing for current and potential homeowners as well as renters. Significantly higher housing costs intensified by budget-busting property tax increases is the single greatest contributor to Juneau’s ever-increasing cost of living.

If the Juneau Assembly is truly interested in more affordable housing and reducing the community’s cost of living, the surest way to accomplish that is through significant spending reductions and a corresponding reduction in property tax.

Is it too much to ask for our Assembly to respect the voters and explore other less expensive alternatives?

After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening became a regular opinion page columnist for the Juneau Empire. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations.

Ford does U-turn, will keep AM radios in 2024 models

Ford Motor Company made a U-turn Tuesday, as CEO Jim Farley announced on LinkedIn that the automaker will keep AM radios in its vehicles, after all, a change from the company’s announced plan to remove the widely used broadcast system from its 2024 models.

The decision applies to both gasoline-powered and electric vehicles in Ford’s lineup, Farley said, acknowledging the role AM radios have in the emergency alert system ecosystem.

“After speaking with policy leaders about the importance of AM broadcast radio as a part of the emergency alert system, we’ve decided to include it on all 2024 Ford & Lincoln vehicles,” Farley wrote.

Farley also said the company would come up with a solution for owners of electric Ford vehicles that don’t have AM radios, by providing software updates to these electric vehicles owners so they can install them.

“Customers can currently listen to AM radio content in a variety of ways in our vehicles — including via streaming — and we will continue to innovate to deliver even better in-vehicle entertainment and emergency notification options in the future,” he said.

Other carmakers that earlier said they will eliminate AM radios in upcoming models — ostensibly because they interfere with the car electronics — have not yet made a similar announcement. That list includes Tesla, BMS, Mazda, and Volkswagen.

Assemblywoman taking ‘medical leave’ is actually going to Europe

Assemblywoman Meg Zaletel announced last week that she would be taking sick leave from the Assembly from May 24 until July 11, as she needs time to heal from the turbulent times in the city; she also announced she would not return to her day job running Anchorage Coalition to End Homelessness until Aug. 1, for the same reason.

“I’ll be using this time to heal and connect with my family and loved ones,” said Zaletel in the statement. “I believe it’s important to acknowledge when it’s time for a break, especially after the turbulent times our community has seen over these last couple of years.” 

Zaletel requested privacy: “Zaletel and her family request privacy during these weeks. Community members in Midtown who need immediate assistance can contact her counterpart, Felix Rivera,” the press release read.

But at Tuesday night’s Assembly meeting it slipped out that she is actually going out of town. A couple of her colleagues wished her well on her “trip.” And it’s not just any trip — it’s an extended stay in Europe.

Also, Must Read Alaska received a confidential report from someone associated with Anchorage Coalition to End Homelessness, which said that the mass exodus from the leadership of the organization was due to Zaletel’s behavior. Four of the five people who have left the organization in the past five months have taken their concerns to the organization’s board about Zaletel’s “yelling,” “demeaning of staff,” and engaging in “unethical behaviors.”

The Anchorage Coalition to End Homelessness has used millions of dollars of public money but has had no measurable impact on the homelessness problem in Anchorage, and many feel the organization is purely a political entity masked as a social service coalition.

Senior managers who left the organization in the past five months include Celia MacLeod, Julie Frizzell, Tahanee Conte-Seccareccia, Helen Renfrew, and one other person who MRAK has not been able to positively identify.

Do you have a tip about Meg Zaletel’s behavior? Send it confidentially to suzanne @ mustreadalaska . com.