Sunday, July 27, 2025
Home Blog Page 562

Tim Barto: The passion of the transgender movement

By TIM BARTO

Transgenderism is now at the forefront of the nation’s consciousness, or at least it’s in the forefront of the nation’s news cycle.

Perhaps more appropriately, it’s at the forefront of a movement by the radical left to overthrow the foundational mores of our country and western civilization as a whole.

Many of us have quit using phrases such as “How much worse can it get?” or “Now I’ve heard it all,” because the responses we keep getting back are, respectively, “Much worse,” and “No you haven’t.”

Like the old baseball adage that you should not speak out loud about a pitcher throwing a no-hitter, expressing thoughts that we’ve reached the limits of bizarreness may bring about the automatic jinx of the next opposing batter getting a base hit. In the case of our changing mores, it’s the next heretofore unbelievable action by the transgender movement. 

Consider the recent story of the Los Angeles Dodgers baseball organization inviting, uninviting, then re-inviting the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence to the team’s LGBTQ+ Pride event.

Setting aside the very valid argument that Major League Baseball should be about promoting the game of baseball instead of alienating their historical fanbase and making it uncomfortable for most parents to take their children to see a ballgame, the Dodgers’ front office felt such immense pressure from the rainbow mob that they not only re-invited but apologized to a group that mocks not just Catholic nuns but all of Christianity.

At first glance, it may seem that the Dodgers did not learn from the horrendous public relations mistakes made by Anheuser-Busch when its Bud Light marketing team openly endorsed biological-male-turned-teenage-girl-impersonator Dylan Mulvaney.

However, maybe the Dodgers did learn something. The Anheuser-Busch/Bud Light (AB/BL) folks realized they insulted their consumer base – essentially, sports-watching men from middle America, whom they could justifiably expect would soon abandon their boycott, just as they did with Nike and the National Football League.

An acknowledgment by AB/BL of the mistake would likely have satiated a crowd that essentially just wants an inexpensive light beer without any attached social statements or alternative lifestyles messaging.

But the AB/BL team also realized that such an apology would generate an alternate firestorm from the transgender crowd, and that would be an even greater fiasco. 

Why? Because the alphabet appropriator base is unashamed and unabashed. They are convinced their side is correct, and any deviation from their point of view amounts to intolerable intolerance. It’s an angry, misguided bunch, but they are extraordinarily passionate about their positions: transwomen are women; gender is a social construct; young children can determine if they are a boy or girl; sex transition surgery is a right that should be paid for by the collective taxpayers; drag queen story hour is harmless fun.

Just a few short years ago, these positions would have been deemed so outrageous they would not have received any serious dialogue or debate, but times have changed, and done so at an incredibly fast pace.

President Bill Clinton signed the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996. Hillary Clinton spoke out against gay marriage, as did President Obama, although they’ve both changed their positions (“evolved,” they called them) in the 2012-2014 time period.

Feminists argued for and staunchly defended Title IX, the federal law that insured equal opportunity for girls and women to compete in sports, but today many feminists are supporting the inclusion of biological males in female sports competitions. 

On a more local level, during the recently ended 2023 legislative session, the testimonials against Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s parental rights legislation (SB96) and for Senator Gray-Jackson’s sex education bill (SB43) included far more people from the alternative lifestyle crowd than the traditional majority. 

The fanaticism of the LGBT+ movement, and the transgender part of that in particular, is fueled by support from the teachers’ unions, public school systems, government institutions, major media outlets, and the entertainment industry:

  • Sports network ESPN honored biological male swimmer Lia Thomas during Women’s History Month for Thomas’ participation as a female college swimmer
  • President Biden appointed biological male Rachel Levine to the rank of four-star Admiral in the Public Health Service. USA Today went on to honor Levine as one of their Women of the Year
  • Sam Brinton, a dress-stealing-and-wearing biological male, was appointed by President Biden as a Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Department of Energy
  • The state of Michigan honored transgender male Owen Bondono as its Teacher of the Year in 2020
  • Time magazine selected transgender actor Michaela Jae Rodriguez as one of its Women of the Year in 2022
  • Sports Illustrated magazine selected transgender singer Kim Petras, a biological male, as one of their cover models for their 2023 swimsuit edition. 

So, is the transgender movement a phase that will go the way of Occupy Wall Street and BLM? Does it have legs enough that 20 years from now we will look upon it as just another transition that changed society forever, or will the pendulum begin to swing in the other direction? 

Tim Barto is a biological male who has been married to the same woman for 33 years. Together they have five children. He’s also vice president of Alaska Family Council, and he is unable to answer the two questions that ended this column.

Win Gruening: How to make Juneau less affordable

By WIN GRUENING

As concern mounted among Juneau citizenry over the community’s rising cost of living, City Manager Rorie Watt initially recommended a lower property tax millage rate of 10.28 for next year’s budget that “generates only enough property tax to pay CBJ general governmental costs after consideration of a $1 million lapse.”

This statement ignores two relevant realities: The City and Borough of Juneau Assembly has earmarked or spent nearly $46 million in public funds to date for the planned construction of two government buildings, rejected by voters, which are estimated to cost around $120 million.

Secondly, property tax assessments this year are rising an average of 16% (though some residents report increases of up to 40%), which negates any purported “reduction” in property taxes by the Assembly.

It is disingenuous to suggest that Juneau’s property taxes cannot be reduced further because “general governmental costs” must be covered after tax revenues have been diverted to discretionary projects. Particularly, when those projects have failed to garner widespread community support and have been turned down by voters. 

 After discussion, the Juneau Assembly approved setting the city’s property tax rate at 10.16. This is, at best, an unconvincing effort to divert attention from an Assembly spending spree that denies taxpayers the relief they need.

The proposed rate reduction is a paltry 3.8% decrease from 2022 when Juneau’s median tax assessed home value had already risen to $527,000 — a 23% increase since 2020. The increase in assessed values without a corresponding reduction in the millage rate translates directly into a higher tax bill for property owners. If viewed honestly, escalating property values over the last two years will cost the average homeowner over $1,000 more in tax annually while the Assembly’s proposed millage rate “reduction” only pares it back a measly $200.

While Juneau’s cost of living continues to outpace larger urban areas in Alaska, city leaders seem determined to drive it even higher with their tax-and-spend appetites. 

Prioritizing the wants of city leaders over the needs of Juneau taxpayers will not expand the community’s tax base which would reduce Juneauites’ individual tax burden by spreading it among more homeowners and businesses.  Indeed, Juneau’s demographics suggest the opposite occurring. The city population is stagnant and school enrollment continues to plummet, placing even more pressure on the municipal budget.

Higher commercial property vacancies in Juneau signal that property owners will be burdened even further. One only needs to roam through the State Office Building to see the empty offices to realize that this will eventually translate to even more vacancies in commercial real estate.

Property owners will also be unavoidably saddled with higher tax bills as a growing number of buildings in Juneau have been purchased by tax-exempt entities and these properties, wholly, or in part, will be removed from the tax rolls, shrinking the tax base even further.

It’s irresponsible to erect new government buildings in this environment and force property taxes even higher to pay for them, without approval by voters of their full cost including any past unapproved appropriations. 

The precipitous rise in property taxes added to other unwarranted Assembly expenditures, is contributing to next year’s record-setting budget, the largest in Juneau’s history.

For example, the Assembly recently made vote-by-mail city elections permanent though the cost to conduct them is significantly higher than conventional in-person elections.  Passed without voter approval, vote-by-mail fails to increase voter turnout, prolongs final election results, and makes fraud and ballot harvesting practices more likely.

While the Assembly continues to promote their “#1 goal of affordable housing,” their actions taken recently directly work against accomplishing that goal.  An unnecessarily high millage rate drives up property taxes and thereby the cost of housing for current and potential homeowners as well as renters. Significantly higher housing costs intensified by budget-busting property tax increases is the single greatest contributor to Juneau’s ever-increasing cost of living.

If the Juneau Assembly is truly interested in more affordable housing and reducing the community’s cost of living, the surest way to accomplish that is through significant spending reductions and a corresponding reduction in property tax.

Is it too much to ask for our Assembly to respect the voters and explore other less expensive alternatives?

After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening became a regular opinion page columnist for the Juneau Empire. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations.

Ford does U-turn, will keep AM radios in 2024 models

Ford Motor Company made a U-turn Tuesday, as CEO Jim Farley announced on LinkedIn that the automaker will keep AM radios in its vehicles, after all, a change from the company’s announced plan to remove the widely used broadcast system from its 2024 models.

The decision applies to both gasoline-powered and electric vehicles in Ford’s lineup, Farley said, acknowledging the role AM radios have in the emergency alert system ecosystem.

“After speaking with policy leaders about the importance of AM broadcast radio as a part of the emergency alert system, we’ve decided to include it on all 2024 Ford & Lincoln vehicles,” Farley wrote.

Farley also said the company would come up with a solution for owners of electric Ford vehicles that don’t have AM radios, by providing software updates to these electric vehicles owners so they can install them.

“Customers can currently listen to AM radio content in a variety of ways in our vehicles — including via streaming — and we will continue to innovate to deliver even better in-vehicle entertainment and emergency notification options in the future,” he said.

Other carmakers that earlier said they will eliminate AM radios in upcoming models — ostensibly because they interfere with the car electronics — have not yet made a similar announcement. That list includes Tesla, BMS, Mazda, and Volkswagen.

Assemblywoman taking ‘medical leave’ is actually going to Europe

Assemblywoman Meg Zaletel announced last week that she would be taking sick leave from the Assembly from May 24 until July 11, as she needs time to heal from the turbulent times in the city; she also announced she would not return to her day job running Anchorage Coalition to End Homelessness until Aug. 1, for the same reason.

“I’ll be using this time to heal and connect with my family and loved ones,” said Zaletel in the statement. “I believe it’s important to acknowledge when it’s time for a break, especially after the turbulent times our community has seen over these last couple of years.” 

Zaletel requested privacy: “Zaletel and her family request privacy during these weeks. Community members in Midtown who need immediate assistance can contact her counterpart, Felix Rivera,” the press release read.

But at Tuesday night’s Assembly meeting it slipped out that she is actually going out of town. A couple of her colleagues wished her well on her “trip.” And it’s not just any trip — it’s an extended stay in Europe.

Also, Must Read Alaska received a confidential report from someone associated with Anchorage Coalition to End Homelessness, which said that the mass exodus from the leadership of the organization was due to Zaletel’s behavior. Four of the five people who have left the organization in the past five months have taken their concerns to the organization’s board about Zaletel’s “yelling,” “demeaning of staff,” and engaging in “unethical behaviors.”

The Anchorage Coalition to End Homelessness has used millions of dollars of public money but has had no measurable impact on the homelessness problem in Anchorage, and many feel the organization is purely a political entity masked as a social service coalition.

Senior managers who left the organization in the past five months include Celia MacLeod, Julie Frizzell, Tahanee Conte-Seccareccia, Helen Renfrew, and one other person who MRAK has not been able to positively identify.

Do you have a tip about Meg Zaletel’s behavior? Send it confidentially to suzanne @ mustreadalaska . com.

Tim Barto: Bible study lesson from a gay rights pioneer

By TIM BARTO

Thirty-six years ago I attended a young adult Bible study group at my former church in San Jose, Calif. Arriving 15 minutes late was Doug (a pseudonym used to protect the innocent as much as cover for my terrible memory for names).

Doug was a good 10 to 15 years older than the rest of us, but we didn’t mind, as he was a bit different and it was unspoken, yet apparent to the rest of us that he needed some socialization, even if it was with a bunch of twenty-somethings whose primary goal of young adult Bible study was to meet a Bible-believing member of the opposite sex. 

On this particular evening in particular, Doug was not only late — a particularly heinous sin in a gathering of staid Lutherans — but he was visibly upset.

Usually, Doug just stared at his surroundings through Coke bottle-thick glasses with a look somewhere between “Where’s the nearest exit?” and “Who’s hiding the coffee and Danish?” But now he was visibly angry, enough that the rest of us were scanning the room for the nearest exit.

“You okay, Doug?” asked our group leader, who also happened to be a rather young assistant pastor and a heckuva centerfielder on our softball team that finished runners-up in the church league that year. (Truth is we should’ve won the championship, but being Lutheran and unencumbered by restrictions on alcohol consumption, still went out after the game and had a few beers with our second place trophies.) 

“Not really,” replied Doug, which was, in actuality, quite an expansive use of vocabulary for him.

“Oh, you just returned from that meeting, huh?” asked the centerfielder. 

Doug turned. “Yes!” he said rather emphatically. We didn’t know what the meeting was that the pastor referred to, but this gathering was already more intriguing than any such previous. But Doug didn’t expand upon his one word answer, so we waited anxiously for him to spill the tea.

“What meeting?” someone finally asked. I admit to being that someone. There were no single, eligible, Bible-believing Bettys there that night and the lesson plan was, to be blunt, uninteresting. Getting Doug to talk about why he was angry, let alone just talk, was far more interesting.

Doug looked at the centerfielder/pastor with a questioning look. “Yeah, it’s okay, Doug. Would you like to let the group know where you were?”

“If it’s okay with you all,” Doug asked the circle of suddenly interested attendees.

“Absolutely. Sure. Tell us, Doug.” The encouragements poured in as we shifted to the edge of our chairs, and I became aware that I wasn’t the only one disappointed with the lesson plan or the lack of potential marriage material.

“Okay, then,” Doug said, following it up with a long pause that almost caused me to fall forward onto the carpet. “I was at a synod meeting where they were discussing the three homosexuals who were being allowed to enter seminary.” This statement was followed by an even longer silence. 

“Pardon?” someone asked, breaking the silence of incredulity that hung over the room. Doug again looked quizzically at the pastor of the golden glove and quick bat.

“If you feel comfortable, Doug. Go ahead,” said the cleric.

“Okay, well, I was asked to attend the meeting because I used to be gay.”

I swear you coulda’ heard a crumb of Danish drop on the carpet. “I lived a homosexual lifestyle from my teens until my yearly 30s,” Doug confessed, “until I was saved.” 

I’m pretty sure no one even blinked because the sound of shutting eyelids would have been audible. Doug proceeded to tell us that he not only lived his early adult life as a gay man, but he was entrenched in the movement. 

“Movement? There’s a gay movement?” Yep, and our very own Douglas, whose persona was increasing in stature by the second, was part of it. He’d been living in San Francisco, which was about an hour north of our location, during the 1970s and early 1980s.

“And I was one of the leaders,” Doug answered.

“The gay movement has leaders?” This question appeared to offend the newly-knighted Sir Douglas, but then he looked around the room, not searching for exit signs or pastries this time, but realizing he had us Silicon Valley yuppies-to-be in unchartered waters. 

Feeling confident now, His Dougness went on to describe how we were going to see big changes in the next 10 to 30 years. Homosexual rights groups were, at that time, protesting to not get beat up while tied to fence posts, but there was a bigger agenda. They would seek admission to the clergy and freedom from employment discrimination. Then they would fight for permission to get married and adopt children. There were timelines and strategies involved. 

I have to believe ol’ Dougie was telling the truth. Everything he said was going to happen has indeed happened, and his timeline was pretty spot on; if anything, it was somewhat pessimistic.

The gay rights movement that Doug was a part of, and then separated himself from, seems tame in today’s world. While in college in the 1980s, there were GALA groups on campus, with GALA standing for “Gay and Lesbian Alliance.”

Now we have half the Roman alphabet committed to a combination of sexual proclivities; a string so long that even its supporters have said “Enough is enough” and inserted a plus sign after so many letters, i.e., LGBTQI+. 

I don’t know if all the other groups in that string of letters have leadership committees like the homosexual movement had, but it would not be surprising. There is certainly an agenda, and a well-organized and funded one at that.

The movement to prop up non-traditional sexual lifestyles — and degrade traditional lifestyles — is fervent. Their supporters are passionate and bold, and they have obviously seen from the gay rights movement how social mores and even religious beliefs can be broken.

Tim Barto left California for Alaska 31 years ago. He is vice president of Alaska Family Council. 

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis launches presidential bid as new-generation GOP leader, post-Trump

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis officially filed his candidacy for the presidency on Wednesday, making his intentions clear as he looks to secure the Republican nomination for the 2024 election.

He plans to make his official announcement on Twitter on Wednesday evening, as Twitter majority owner Elon Musk continues to build the platform’s live video capabilities. His advance video was previewed on Twitter on Tuesday evening.

The filing comes after months of speculation and hints from the governor, who has been touted as a potential frontrunner for the GOP ticket.

DeSantis, a staunch conservative, has been a prominent figure in Florida politics, serving as the state’s governor for a second term and previously as a U.S. congressional representative. He has built a reputation as a strong advocate for conservative governance, implementing policies that have garnered support from Republicans nationwide, and infuriated the Left. DeSantis has galvanized Florida into a Republican stronghold.

Presenting himself as an alternative to former President Donald Trump, DeSantis aims to appeal to those within the party who are looking for a new generation of leadership. With his candidacy, he hopes to energize voters who believe it is time to move on from the Trump era and embrace a fresh direction for the Republican Party.

In anticipation of his official announcement, a super PAC called “Never Back Down” was formed several weeks ago to support DeSantis’s anticipated bid.

To test the waters for his, DeSantis embarked on a nationwide book tour, strategically visiting key states to establish connections with potential voters and gain recognition on a broader scale. He was talking about points from his book, “The Courage to be Free: Florida’s Blueprint for America’s Revival.”

Former President Donald Trump, who remains a significant force within the Republican Party, has been relentless in his attacks on DeSantis.

Despite the constant jabs, DeSantis has refrained from engaging in a war of words with Trump, choosing instead to focus on his own message and vision for the party. The governor’s decision not to respond directly to Trump’s criticisms reflects a deliberate effort to differentiate himself from the former president and present a more measured and independent image.

While early polling indicates that Trump currently holds a substantial lead over DeSantis, the official entry of the Florida governor into the race may bring about a shift in the dynamics of the Republican primary. As the campaign unfolds, DeSantis will have the opportunity to articulate his policy positions and gain momentum among voters who seek a new direction for the GOP.

With his proven track record in Florida and his appeal to conservative voters, DeSantis is poised to challenge the dominance of Trump.

Other Republicans who have announced include former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott, former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson, conservative commentator Larry Elder, tech entrepreneur and finance executive Vivek Ramaswamy. Also, long-shot Dallas businessman and pastor Ryan Binkley, not the same as the Ryan Binkley who is publisher of the Anchorage Daily News.

 

Odd Man: ‘Veterans’ group to organize in support of Alaska’s open primaries, ranked choice voting system

A new group, calling itself Veterans for Political Innovation, is set to launch its Alaska chapter in Eagle River, with an agenda that has raised concerns among the local conservatives in the community.

With a significant population of active military personnel and veterans residing in the area, the group’s choice of location has drawn attention to its potential motives.

The launch meeting is scheduled to take place at Odd Man Brewing Company in Eagle River on Thursday, starting at 4:30 pm. The event is promoted as a happy hour.

A look into the hidden agenda behind Veterans for Political Innovation reveals a connection to a larger cause and Democrat groups. Veterans for Political Innovation acts as a protection racket for the open primaries and ranked choice voting. The group’s main financial backing comes from the Institute for Political Innovation, founded by Katherine Gehl, a far-left businesswoman known for her donations exclusively to Democratic candidates, as documented by OpenSecrets.org.

Among the principals of the Institute for Political Innovation is Scott Kendall, a well-known Alaska lawyer and political activist who serves as a senior advisor to the group. Kendall was instrumental in bringing Alaska’s open primaries and ranked choice voting to the state through his involvement with Alaskans for Better Elections and the successful push to get Ballot Measure 2 approved in 2020.

Surprisingly, the sole representative listed for Veterans for Political Innovation in Alaska is Michael Flint, an LGBTQ activist who identifies as a veteran. He is an employee of the State of Alaska.

Flint, who is the president of “Pride at Work Alaska,” was recently seen lobbying for the passage of an LGBTQ bill in the Capitol in Juneau. Reports indicate that Flint refused to engage with lawmakers who are not gay, raising questions about impartiality and the motives behind his involvement with Veterans for Political Innovation.

Critics argue that that the open primary and ranked choice voting general election system in Alaska guaranteed a Democrat victory in the Alaska U.S. House seat, as it pitted Republicans against each other and left the field open for Rep. Mary Peltola to win.

Leading the staff of Veterans for Political Innovation are notable figures, including Eric Bronner, the chief operating officer, and an heir to the Dr. Bronner soap company. The Bronner Family Foundation is one of the main funders of Veterans for Political Innovation. CEO and co-founder Todd Connor, along with Dan Biga, chief of staff, and Jamison Aweau, director of brand, complete the top leadership team of this group that is a surrogate for the mother ship, Institute for Political Innovation.

The group’s tax filings do not yet appear at the IRS database; the group was formed in 2021, and the IRS is far behind in updating its public-facing database.

Connor and Bronner say they present at the launch event in Eagle River, and most certainly will be coordinating with Alaskans for Better Elections staff while in the state. Alaskans for Better Elections is funded by Outside dark money from far-left groups such as Unite America.

Texas becomes ninth state to withdraw from ERIC voter roll organization

On Tuesday, the Texas House of Representatives voted to withdraw the state from the Electronic Registration Information Center (ERIC), a nonprofit organization aimed at identifying duplicate voter registrations and facilitating the cleansing of voter rolls.

The decision comes amid growing concerns among conservatives about ERIC’s perceived liberal ties and the lack of transparency surrounding its operations.

Senate Bill 1070, which proposed Texas’ withdrawal from ERIC, passed the House with a vote of 85-61. However, before becoming law, the bill must return to the Texas Senate for concurrence on an amendment that adds requirements to adhere to federal and state privacy guidelines in case an alternative system is contracted by the state. It must also be signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott.

Texas joins eight other states that have already withdrawn from ERIC: Ohio, Iowa, Virginia, Florida, West Virginia, Missouri, Louisiana, and Alabama. The withdrawals highlight a growing trend of conservative-leaning states expressing skepticism and distrust toward the organization.

One concern voiced by conservatives is ERIC’s perceived liberal roots and alleged lack of neutrality. The organization’s initial funding was provided by the nonpartisan Pew Charitable Trusts, which receives funding from philanthropist George Soros. Although ERIC asserts that the funds from Soros were separate from its financing and were not directed toward the organization, conservatives remain skeptical, because funding is fungible — funds for one project allow other funds to be used for another project. The fact that ERIC allows non-voting board members, who appear to be affiliated with left-leaning entities, has raised concerns about potential partisanship within the organization.

ERIC has also faced criticism over its handling of sensitive voter information. Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose, during the process of withdrawing his state from ERIC, expressed concerns about the organization’s lack of accountability and misinformation campaigns.

“I cannot justify the use of Ohio’s tax dollars for an organization that seems intent on rejecting meaningful accountability, publicly maligning my motives, and waging a relentless campaign of misinformation about this effort,” LaRose wrote in March.

Florida Secretary of State Cord Byrd cited the need to protect citizens’ personal information as the reason behind Florida’s loss of confidence in ERIC.

“As Secretary of State, I have an obligation to protect the personal information of Florida’s citizens, which the ERIC agreement requires us to share,” Byrd said in March. “Florida has tried to back reforms to increase protections, but these protections were refused. Therefore, we have lost confidence in ERIC.”

Another issue that has added to ERIC’s declining membership is the lack of trust among conservatives regarding the organization’s objectives.

ERIC’s main function involves comparing voter registration data from member states and cross-referencing it with other information to identify outdated registrations due to factors such as death, relocation, or duplicate registrations.

However, the loss of 25% of its membership within a year raises questions about the future viability of ERIC, and its actual effectiveness. Losing Texas and Florida and their tens of millions of voter data, is a significant blow to the organization.

Assembly won’t settle wrongful claims made by former municipal manager

The Anchorage Assembly debated whether to settle wrongful discharge claims made by former Municipal Manager Amy Demboski. Several of them took turns bashing Mayor Dave Bronson, calling his administration toxic, and some of them said that the $550,000 was just a lot of money.

In the end, on a vote of 8-4, the Assembly decided to let the matter go to court. They were not able to resist the political temptation to have the mayor in court with Demboski during what will be an election year, because due to the slow nature of justice, this case will not be settle before 2024. Such election year drama will likely hurt all conservatives on the ballot, and may doom the mayor’s chances for a second term.

Demboski does not have an actual lawsuit filed yet, because the Bronson Administration asked for the matter to go to mediation, and she agreed.

But now that the Assembly has turned down the amount agreed to by both parties, all of the details that led to her firing will be revealed in court. Demboski will claim a protected status of whistleblower, and the Assembly will use possibly millions of dollars to allow the court case to become a campaign against Bronson’s reelection. It’s lawfare — legal warfare, and during a campaign cycle.

Going to court could cost the city triple damages if Demboski wins, if the court agrees with her that she was fired for being a whistleblower.

In a separate matter, the Assembly approved a $277,000 legal case brought by a member of the Ombudsman’s Office. Heather McAlpine worked in the Office of Equal Opportunity, but now works for the Assembly, and her claim was settled without much debate. In fact, several Assembly members praised her for suing the Bronson Administration.