Sunday, May 10, 2026
Home Blog Page 333

Alaska Democrats unleash their fury, as they blame Nick Begich for their back-to-back losses in court

32

The Alaska Democratic Party is red-faced over having lost in Alaska Superior Court and then at the Alaska Supreme Court.

The Democrats are anguished there is a second Democrat running for Congress due to a situation created by the open primary system they defend.

It’s the “play stupid games and win stupid prizes” scenario they made, and they are now embarrassed and angry at the result. It’s someone else’s fault, they say. It’s Nick Begich’s fault.

Alaska’s hardline Democrats will now be able to choose between Democrat Rep. Mary Peltola and Democrat Eric Hafner, who is in federal prison. Voters may also choose Republican Nick Begich or Alaskan Independence Party John Waye Howe. All four will be on the congressional section of the Nov. 5 ballot.

The Democrats sued to get Hafner off the ballot. As an Antifa-style Democrat, he presents a real threat to Peltola, even though he is serving time in prison. Hafner pulls votes from Peltola’s left, and in ranked-choice voting, some Democrats may pick Hafner first to send a message.

Alaska Democrats say on their t-shirts and hoodies that they’re “NOT like Lower 48 Dems.” Indeed, Alaska Democrats are more in the Sen. Bernie Sanders camp, with a socialistic flair. In 2016, they voted for Bernie Sanders for president over Hillary Clinton. They tend to go further to the left than most Democrats in America.

Hafner may appeal to the Alaska Democrat base, as he is more of a Bernie Sanders type. What’s more, Hafner has a platform that calls for Native sovereignty and return of all land to indigenous people; it’s a platform that helped him do well in Hawaii, when he ran for office there. Peltola, on the other hand, is so timid that she won’t even endorse Kamala Harris for president, and she doesn’t show up for work.

The Democratic Party say this is all Nick Begich’s doing that their Antifa Democrat is on the ballot. In a news press release, the Democrats call Begich a long shot who has a “snowball’s chance in hell of winning.”

Then, the Democrats accuse Begich of using dirty tricks, as if he was the one who had signed up Hafner. In fact, Hafner has run in other states — it’s kind of a hobby of his to run for Congress. He ran in Oregon as a Democrat in 2018. In Hawaii, he got 44% of the vote in the primary in 2016.

But evidently Begich is not such a long shot, because the Democrats are spilling a lot of ink being mad at him. They are not attacking their second Democrat candidate who filed for office against the incumbent. It’s all Nick Begich’s fault, they say in their news release that foreshadows what their message is going to be from here until Nov. 5.

“The Alaska Democratic Party is disappointed with the Alaska Supreme Court ruling that a convicted felon who is incarcerated in New York until 2036 will remain on the ballot as a candidate for Congress despite the fact that he cannot possibly be an inhabitant of Alaska when elected or serve out a term in Washington D.C.,” the Democrats wrote, before unleashing their full fury on “longshot” Nick Begich by calling him a “loser.”

“Eric Hafner. a non-Alaskan in prison in New York for making bomb threats against elected officials, was certified by the Division of Elections on September 2nd after finishing sixth in the August primary with less than 0.5% of the votes cast. The certification came on the heels of fifth-place finisher Republican Matthew Salisbury withdrawing from the race at the last possible moment after an orchestrated effort by two—time loser Republican candidate Nick Begich.”

Polling shows Peltola and Nick Begich are now tied, 45-45. The Democrats have their own polling that shows them the same thing, which is why they are turning their venom on him.

“Begich came in a distant second to U.S. Rep. Mary Peltola in the August primary and clearly knows he has a snowball’s chance in hell of winning.” said Executive Director Lindsay Kavanaugh, expressing the party’s deepening anxiety. “His dirty tactics don’t change the fact he’s a longshot.”

In fact, it was the Alaska Republican Party, not Nick Begich, that filed a brief to intervene in the case as an interested party. But it was the State of Alaska’s Division of Elections that was the defendant.

“Unsurprisingly, the Alaska Republican Party publicly supports the decision that a convicted felon who is running his campaign from a prison cell in New York should appear on Alaska’s ballot as a candidate for federal office.” said Mike Wenstrup, chairman of the party that has 73,000 registered voters in Alaska. “This ruling sets a dangerous precedent and is embarrassing for our state.”

Embarrassing to the state? The open primary and ranked-choice general election is proving to be that. But it’s mostly embarrassing for the Democrats, whose logic is that all that political parties need to do is have opponents arrested, and get them convicted by partisan juries to disqualify them from running for office.

It’s a playbook they have already used to injure presidential candidate Donald Trump. The fact that a Manhattan jury convicted Trump for 34 felonies for improper business documentation did not prevent Trump from continuing on as a candidate for president. The Constitution does not prohibit felons from running for office.

But the Democrats didn’t consider Hafner a real threat in June. In fact, the Democrats, through Democrat operative Jim Lottsfeldt, were spending tens of thousands of dollars on ads to get Republican Gerald Heikes more votes in the primary so he would appear on the November ballot and take votes from Nick Begich. They ignored the peril that Hafner posed to them if he moved into contention, so they never challenged his candidacy until the primary election was certified on Sept. 1.

The Alaska Supreme Court is known as a liberal body, due to the way judges are picked in the 49th state; the Alaska Bar Association has an oversized role in the process, and the lawyers who make up the bar are largely Democrat.

But even the Alaska Supreme Court did not think the Democrats had a case in their efforts to disenfranchise Hafner.

Democrats are in the “finding out” part of the “F— around and find out” scenario they created.

Notably, the Alaska Democratic Party did not publish its ‘loser, longshot, dirty tactics” statement on its own website, but rather just on social media. On the party’s own website, it fully supports the open primary system that put their own felon on the ballot.

“Ranked Choice Voting is easier than you think (and the Republicans would like you to believe),” the Democrats state on their website.

So easy, even a felon can game it from prison.

The question Kamala Harris would not answer: Are you better off now than you were four years ago?

54

At the first and possibly last debate between former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris, hosted by ABC on Sept. 10, moderators started with a question for Harris that was short and to the point:

When it comes to the economy, do you believe Americans are better off than they were four years ago?

Here is how Harris pivoted and did not answer the question from moderator David Muir:

“So, I was raised as a middle-class kid. And I am actually the only person on this stage who has a plan that is about lifting up the middle class and working people of America. I believe in the ambition, the aspirations, the dreams of the American people. And that is why I imagine and have actually a plan to build what I call an opportunity economy. Because here’s the thing. We know that we have a shortage of homes and housing, and the cost of housing is too expensive for far too many people. We know that young families need support to raise their children. And I intend on extending a tax cut for those families of $6,000, which is the largest child tax credit that we have given in a long time. So that those young families can afford to buy a crib, buy a car seat, buy clothes for their children. My passion, one of them, is small businesses. I was actually — my mother raised my sister and me but there was a woman who helped raise us. We call her our second mother. She was a small business owner. I love our small businesses. My plan is to give a $50,000 tax deduction to start-up small businesses, knowing they are part of the backbone of America’s economy. My opponent, on the other hand, his plan is to do what he has done before, which is to provide a tax cut for billionaires and big corporations, which will result in $5 trillion to America’s deficit. My opponent has a plan that I call the Trump sales tax, which would be a 20% tax on everyday goods that you rely on to get through the month. Economists have said that Trump’s sales tax would actually result for middle-class families in about $4,000 more a year because of his policies and his ideas about what should be the backs of middle-class people paying for tax cuts for billionaires.”

The facts:

Do you think most Americans are better off now than four years ago? Add your comments below.

Fear factor: Murkowski and Peltola refuse to say if they’re voting for Harris, but they say they won’t vote for Trump

47

Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski was impressed with Kamala Harris’ debate performance against Donald Trump earlier this week, according to a new interview with her in the publication Semafor. Murkowski is warming up to Vice President Harris, it appears, saying Harris has “leadership presence,” but stopping short of endorsing her.

Murkowski told the reporter she “saw a side of Kamala Harris that I’ve not seen before, which was a firm and clear kind of leadership presence. Maybe that was just practiced and rehearsed for one time only. But I think it came across … that was news to me. I’d never seen her in gatherings where she’s kind of talking leader-to-leader.”

It may be shocking for Alaskans who saw the debate between Trump and Harris, because Harris did not answer the questions but instead pivoted to her pre-planned answers. But for Murkowski, it was a good performance.

In fact, Murkowski may have a memory block. She has, indeed, been with Harris in leadership situations. She attended a luncheon of women leaders in Washington, D.C. in 2021, hosted by Vice President Harris, and the vice president seated Murkowski right next to her.

But newly discovered leadership presence and stunning debate skills aside, “I’m still really struggling with the policy perspectives that she brings to the table that for a state like mine are really hard. Really, really hard. So, I’m still ‘none of the above,’” Murkowski told Semafor’s reporter. Murkowski was one of just seven Republicans who voted in favor of convicting Trump during his second impeachment trial; her distaste for Trump is poorly disguised and he has no warmth toward her, either.

Will Murkowski throw her vote away and write someone’s name in? Why won’t she just tell Alaskans who she thinks is best for the state in terms of policy? She says she is worried about Harris’ policies, so what does she think about Trump’s policies? Or is this simply fear that if Trump is elected, she will be sidelined?

Murkowski is joined by Sen. Mitt Romney of Utah, Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, and Sen. Todd Young of Indiana, none of whom are supporting Trump, but all of whom are in the “none of the above” category.

Sen. Murkowski is also joined by Alaska Rep. Mary Peltola, who is refusing to say if she will vote for Harris, but it’s clear from her words she will not be voting for Trump.

“I’m not voting for Trump & I’m not endorsing anyone else either. The media won’t allow us to engage in nuanced conversation because it doesn’t sell clicks. I won’t vote for a candidate who’s not pro-choice. I can’t ask Alaskans to vote for a candidate who’s not pro-energy,” Peltola said on X/Twitter in July.

As she is in the heat of her reelection bid and is considered vulnerable, she is not saying who she supports. Her statements in the past have been that she wants to stay away from controversy. She often skips votes in the House when she thinks they are too controversial. Or she is known to just vote “present,” as she did on the Alaska’s Right to Produce Act, after telling her Democrat colleagues to oppose it.

Rather than be on record voting for Harris at the National Democratic Convention in August, Peltola just skipped going, even though she was a delegate with voting responsibilities.

This refusal to go public on a matter of the greatest consequence for Alaska is unheard of, and that makes it historic for Alaska: Two of the three sitting representatives in Washington, D.C. are simply not going to tell Alaskans who they are going to vote for in the presidential race.

Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan has already endorsed Trump. In February he said that the policies of the Trump Administration were vastly better for Alaska than the over 65 executive orders Biden has signed that have targeted Alaska’s economy. Sullivan served for two years parallel to the Obama Administration, four years while Trump was president, and through Biden’s three and a half years, and he’s seen the difference.

Sullivan said in Ketchikan that “the two leading Presidential candidates both have detailed records on Alaska: Biden gets a “D-“ and Trump gets a “strong A.” In fact, working with me and our Republican Senate majority, the Trump Administration’s record to advance the interests of Alaskans is unmatched: ANWR, access to NPR-A, the King Cove Road, the Ambler Road, allotments for our heroic Alaska Native Vietnam Veterans, the Tongass Roadless rule exemption, reestablishing our state’s right to manage fish and game, Operation Lady Justice to address the missing and murdered indigenous women crisis, historic investments in public safety for rural Alaska villages, defending our Second Amendment rights, appointing conservative judges to the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, and putting prominent Alaskans in Senate confirmed assistant secretary positions at the Department of the Interior.

“From Day 1, President Biden has focused on reversing this historic record of achievement to the significant detriment of Alaskans. If re-elected, President Biden will continue his aggressive, illegal push to turn Alaska into a giant national park. For all these reasons, I am again supporting former President Trump for President and working with my colleagues to regain a Republican majority in the U.S. Senate,” Sullivan said.

“Alaskans deserve to know who their elected leaders support,” said Randy Ruedrich, former chairman of the Alaska Republican Party. “It’s one of the things you do in representing us. If you’re afraid to represent us, maybe you should not be there.”

One politico at a Republican fundraiser in Anchorage on Friday night said, “We all know Mary and Lisa are both voting for Harris but they’re chickening out and won’t admit it publicly. This is just showing weakness and fear.”

Joke’s on you: Peltola’s ally Rep. Jamie Raskin files bill to force ranked-choice voting onto all the states

29

Democrat Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, a mentor and ally of Rep. Mary Peltola of Alaska, is a sponsor of legislation to force ranked-choice voting onto U.S. congressional elections for both the House and Senate — across all the states.

Raskin and Democrat Rep. Don Beyer of Virginia reintroduced their Ranked Choice Voting Act. Sen. Peter Welch, a Vermont Democrat, introduced mirror legislation in the Senate.

Rep. Peltola got to Congress due to the curiosities and quirks of ranked-choice voting in Alaska’s 2022 election, brought on by a dark-money ballot initiative that passed in 2020 in Alaska.

This year, voters in Alaska are being given the opportunity to unwind that legislation, which has been shown to be damaging to the state, particularly to the confidence voters have in election integrity. The system is so bad in Alaska that it even put an out-of-state Democrat felon on the ballot, which resulted in the Alaska Democrats suing over the system that they created with the intention of fooling voters.

Peltola is a close ally of Rep. Raskin. She joined Raskin’s “Democracy Summer” to train young people to be Democrat revolutionaries prepared to do battle should Donald Trump become president.

Raskin is on record saying he would stop Trump from becoming president by blocking his confirmation, and he’s been building the army of young Democrats to help him create “civil war conditions” if Trump wins in November.

The Raskin ranked-choice voting requirement would force ranked choice voting on all congressional primary and general elections starting in 2028. His legislation is being pushed by FairVote, the same dark-money group that convinced Alaskans to adopt the system.

With RCV, voters rank candidates, rather than pick one or another. If a candidate receives more than half of the first choices, that candidate wins. If not, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and voters who picked that candidate as ‘number 1’ have their votes redistributed and counted for their next favored choice. This process continues until a candidate wins with more than half the votes. It encourages people to soften their moral and political convictions and accept a less-than-ideal candidate because they “voted” for that people at some point in the ranking method.

In this method, people who rank may have their ballots counted more than once, while people who do not rank may have their ballots “exhausted,” punishing them for not ranking after the first round of counting if they did not choose the winning candidate.

Rep. Peltola supports ranked-choice voting. It was a major factor in her win as a Democrat in a conservative state.

Republican Nick Begich, who is challenging Peltola for her seat in Congress, opposes the scheme that was developed by liberals to divide and conquer the Republican-leaning slate of candidates.

“Ranked choice voting focuses American elections and campaigns on coalition-building,” said Rep. Raskin. “Our legislation incentivizes candidates to reach a broader range of the voting public, making our electoral process more democratic, more positive, more efficient and more representative—and our Congress too.” 

In fact, Peltola has voted 80% of the time with Rep. Nancy Pelosi, and when Peltola finds voting uncomfortable due to her conservative district, she just doesn’t show up for work or votes “present.” She has not been bipartisan in the way people remember Congressman Don Young being bipartisan.

But Sen. Welch says ranked-choice voting is more “equitable.”

“This pro-democracy bill will make our elections more equitable, more civil, and more representative,” Welch said, promoting the mythology around ranked-choice voting, not mentioning that Alaska Democrats have sued because the system they created has now worked against them.

“Ranked choice voting is the fastest-growing election reform in the nation because it works,” said Meredith Sumpter, President and CEO of FairVote, the group that is one of the leading funders of ranked-choice voting initiatives like Alaska’s.

She, Welch, and Raskin don’t talk about the tens of thousands of Alaskans signed petitions supporting a repeal.

Sumpter’s FairVote group doesn’t just want ranked-choice voting in all states. It also promotes abolishing the Electoral College, a move that would favor states with more population and more socialist governments and penalize states like Alaska, where there are fewer people but who are more libertarian in political leanings. Funding for FairVote comes from various George Soros-allied foundations, according to InfluenceWatch.org:

Laura and John Arnold Foundation,  Omidyar Network Fund,  Open Society Foundations (George Soros),  Jennifer and Jonathan Allan Soros Foundation,  Democracy Fund,  Tides FoundationWilliam and Flora Hewlett FoundationJoyce FoundationJohn D. and Catherine T. MacArthur FoundationPublic Welfare FoundationSoros Fund Charitable FoundationCarnegie Corporation of  New YorkRockefeller Brothers Fund, and the Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation.

Some of these groups, such as Laura and John Arnold Foundation, were also top funders for the ballot initiative that changed Alaska’s voting to the open primary and ranked-choice general election that has been so problematic. During the past week, Democrats in Alaska have been suing to force a Democrat off of the November ballot.

Although Raskin and Peltola are in the minority in the House and this legislation is not likely to advance if the Republicans maintain control of the House of Representatives, it comes at a time when Alaskans are having serious doubts about open primaries and ranked-choice general elections.

Their doubts are increased because this November, a Democrat who is a felon serving time in an out-of-state federal penitentiary, will appear on the ranked-choice ballot for Alaska’s congressional seat — all because of the open primary system that doesn’t allow parties to vet their candidates.

Read the full text of the RCV Act here

Thanks, but no: Anchorage Daily News owners politely decline recognizing journalists’ new union

19

The owners of the Anchorage Daily News were invited by unionizing reporters to recognize the Anchorage News Guild as the legal labor negotiating entity representing the newsroom at the daily paper, which now only publishes in newsprint twice a week.

ADN owner Ryan Binkley said “no.”

That means the election at the new union will go forward for the 16 or so employees of the newsroom who signed union authorization cards for the newly forming Anchorage News Guild. Those who wish to support the journalists in organizing a union can sign the petition here.

“As the representation petition Anchorage News Guild filed with the National Labor Relations Board requests, we believe the employees should have an opportunity to decide whether they wish to be represented by the Anchorage News Guild in a free and fair secret ballot election conducted by the NLRB,” Binkley wrote in a letter to staff on Thursday, according to the letter that the union organizers publicized.

The reporters want higher pay and believe that unionizing will bring that to them.

“The decision by ADN management not to grant voluntary recognition of the Anchorage News Guild delays the beginning of contract negotiations that newsroom employees have said are critical to guarantee equitable, sustainable wages moving forward,” the guild said in a statement. “Their decision fails to honor the voices of the hard-working staff of the ADN newsroom.”

The guild members believe they will succeed and will organize under a national union, NewsGuild-CWA, which represents 25,000 media professionals at over 40 publications.

The local guild reports that the newspaper has hired a Seattle law firm that represents Starbucks and other companies that face unionizing.

“ADN management has also hired an attorney from Littler Mendelson, a notoriously anti-union law firm,” the union said, adding that the money would be “better spent investing in our newsroom and our community.”

Peltola missing from House hearing on Biden declaring all Arctic areas to be EPA wetlands

34

The Biden-Harris Administration has done the unthinkable, seizing authority over nearly all of Alaska’s Arctic, but Rep. Mary Peltola has remained a no-show in Washington, not defending Alaska’s economy or sovereignty.

In a critical House Transportation Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment hearing on Sept. 11, Peltola was notably absent, while testimony was given by a state official concerning the Biden-Harris Administration’s declaration of nearly all of Alaska’s Arctic to be wetlands protected under the Clean Water Act. Peltola is a member of the House Transportation Committee.

Biden’s action contradicts the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 rulings on wetlands, known as Sackett v. EPA. Peltola not only was absent, but provided no written testimony to the committee on the Biden-Harris actions that will wreak havoc on Alaska’s economy.

The Biden-Harris Administration claims that nearly all of Alaska’s Arctic Coastal Plain is a wetland protected under the Clean Water Act, in defiance of the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2023 wetlands ruling, an Alaska state official told a House subcommittee on Wednesday.

It’s an example of the Biden administration’s regulatory overreach, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Commissioner Emma Pokon told the House subcommittee hearing, and the overreach extends to permafrost on the North Slope.

“We have roughly 900,000 miles of navigable rivers and streams; 22,000 square miles of lakes; 27,000 miles of coastline; and, at about 130 million acres, more wetlands than every other state in the union combined. And all of that is before considering glaciers and groundwater. Anyone looking to build a home, a road, or a mine in the state will likely
impact a water of some sort,” Commissioner Pokon said in her testimony.

Federal agencies continue to grope for complete authority over all waters, Pokon said. More than a year after Sackett was decided and the agencies published a revised rule, EPA and the Corps have not developed any standard that can be understood and implemented by the regulated community and state partners. The federal government appears intent on “leveraging uncertainty and the risk of civil and criminal liability to effectively maintain sweeping authority in their own hands,” Pokon said.

Peltola announced earlier this week that she is taking the entire week off to mark the one-year anniversary of her husband’s fatal plane crash. It is a cultural tradition, she said. She also took all of July off to cut and smoke salmon, also saying it was in honor of a cultural tradition. She has spent no meaningful time in Washington D.C. this summer but may be back at work in mid-September, barring any other cultural events that she must mark.

Her participation could have been crucial, given that Alaska’s waterways are essential not only for its environment but for fishing, energy, and infrastructure development.

Critics of the administration’s approach, including Republican subcommittee members, argued that the current regulatory environment hampers economic development. They cited delays in project approvals, especially for key industries like energy and construction, and referenced projects across the nation being stalled due to bureaucratic delays. One example discussed was Novo Nordisk’s $4 billion expansion project in North Carolina, which has been hampered by permitting delays under WOTUS rules.

The absence of Rep. Peltola was seen as a missed opportunity for Alaska to voice its concerns directly to the panel. Alaska, with its vast wetlands and waterways, faces unique environmental and economic challenges that require careful balancing of federal oversight and state-level autonomy.

Watch the hearing here:

Witness list and written testimony can be seen at these links:
Ms. Emma Pokon, Commissioner, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation | Witness Testimony
Ms. Nicole Rowan, Director, Water Quality Control Division, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment | Witness Testimony
Ms. Courtney Briggs, Chairman, Waters Advocacy Coalition, on behalf of the American Farm Bureau Federation | Witness Testimony
Mr. Vincent E. Messerly, P.E., President, Stream and Wetlands Foundation, on behalf of the National Association of Home Builders | Witness Testimony

Breaking: Democracy wins, Democrats lose as Alaska Supreme Court allows convict to remain on ballot

60

The Alaska Supreme Court on Thursday heard the appeal of the Alaska Democratic Party, which was trying to kick a Democrat off of the ballot in the Alaska congressional race so Rep. Mary Peltola, the party’s favored Democrat, could have a better chance at winning reelection.

In the end, the Democrats were denied their attempt to game the ranked-choice voting system. All the justices but one voted to uphold the judgment of Superior Court Judge Ian Wheeles, who had said the Democrats were essentially trying to change the rules and were too little, too late to challenge the candidacy of Eric Hafner.

Currently, Hafner, Peltola, and Republican Nick Begich and Alaskan Independence Party John Wayne Howe are on the November ballot, which is now being printed for the Nov. 5 election.

The Democrats raise several points about Democrat Eric Hafner, and why he should be kicked off the ballot so voters would not be confused by having two Democrats to choose from.

Democrats complained that Hafner is serving time in federal prison and therefore would not be able to serve in Congress. Yet the Constitution makes no law against felons running for federal office. That’s possibly because such a law would encourage opposing parties to arrest candidates — as the Democrats have done with Donald Trump — in order to make them unqualified to serve.

Superior Court Judge Wheeles’ decision said the Democrats had made up all kinds of imaginary possibilities for the future that they have no way of knowing or proving, and that Eric Hafner is within his rights to file as a candidate. The Division of Elections made no error of judgment in allowing him to take the fourth slot on the ballot, since two previous candidates had dropped out after the primary.

Wheeles said that “one’s failure to plan does not constitute another’s emergency,” of the Democrats and their challenge of Eric Hafner’s name on the ballot. It’s their own fault they didn’t challenge Hafner’s qualifications in the legal time allowed, which is 10 days after the closure of the candidate filing period.

Only Supreme Court Justice Susan Carney dissented from the decision of the Supreme Court, saying she would have reversed Judge Wheeles’ decision which can be read here:

The printing and testing for accuracy of the November ballot is already underway at the Division of Elections. The ballots for overseas military voters must be put in the mail this month.

The Supreme Court has only announced its decision and is expected to explain its reasoning at a later time.

The Alaska Republican Party statement came out at about 9 p.m. on Thursday. Carmela Warfield, chairwoman of the Alaska Republican Party, called it a great day for Alaska and the rule of law.

“The courts agreed with the Alaska Republican Party and did not allow the Alaska Democratic Party to game the election to their benefit,” Warfield said.

“But what the current law allows is that we have an incarcerated, out-of-state Democrat on the General Election ballot in Alaska because of the confusing, ill-conceived ranked choice voting scheme that is currently the law in our state, whether we like it or not. And the Alaska Democratic Party sure seemed to like ranked choice voting util they decided they didn’t like it. Our traditional, straight-forward voting process would have addressed this second Democrat on the ballot and he would have been removed through his party’s primary,” Warfield said.

“We Alaskans have the opportunity in November to make sure this does not happen again in our great state, to turn away from outside influences and do what’s best for Alaska, by returning to a system of fair elections that all Alaskans — regardless of party affiliation — can be proud of,” she said.

This story will be updated.

Michael Dukes asks: Why is Bobby Burgess playing victim card over ‘Butt Gate’ photo?

16

On Thursday’s Michael Dukes Show, radio host of the same name spent a good part of the first hour discussing the bare bottom of Fairbanks North Star School Board member Bobby Burgess.

A while ago, Burgess’ wife, who is a major donor to Senate candidate and Assembly Presiding Officer Savannah Fletcher, published a photo on social media of her husband standing at the stove in a kitchen while wearing nothing but an apron to prevent a nasty burn on his privates.

Dukes played excerpts from KTFV’s report about the incident, including Burgess saying that people who have reposted the photo on social media have invaded his privacy.

That’s the thing about the internet. It’s a tough lesson that Hunter Biden had to learn as lascivious photos emerged of him during his drug-and-thug days, and it’s a lesson that Fairbanks School Board member Burgess is now learning.

Rep. Marjorie Green Taylor in committee shows a photo of Hunter Biden that supposedly was found on his laptop, as Democrat Rep. Jamie Raskin, in a do-rag, looks on.

“You put it on the internet, it’s on the internet,” Dukes said. “You don’t put naked pics of your husband on social media.”

In Anchorage in 2020, Mayor Ethan Berkowitz resigned after a photo taken of his naked backside was posted in Facebook by a local news anchor. In that photo, his bottom was not as clearly visible as in the Burgess photo.

The photo published by news anchor Maria Athens that led to his resignation in 2020.

The talk of Fairbanks continues as the jokes about Burgess’ now-famous butt just continue to crack themselves.

But Dukes had a serious message, too. Burgess’ wife gave a non-apology for her role, and both she and her husband played the victim card, saying they were the subject of misinformation by a small group of people who disagree with their politics.

The photo of Bobby Burgess, posted on social media, has an emoji placed on it by citizen Keith Fons of North Pole to add some needed coverage.

Burgess’ wife Schupp was the one who recently led the charge to have Assemblywoman Barbara Haney removed from the Assembly because a letter she wrote to the editor did not include proper disclaimer that it was her own opinion, not that of the Assembly.

According to the Schupp complaint, the column written by Haney in the Fairbanks Daily News Miner failed to use the specific phrase “in my opinion as a private citizen,” in an opinion column.

Presiding Officer Fletcher, now running for Alaska Senate, allowed the complaint to move forward, even though others on the Assembly have written letters to the editor before that did not contain that exact phrase. Ultimately, Haney was not removed but was censured and fined $1 as a way to humiliate the conservative. That story is here:

Burgess himself recently posted on social media that there was a lack of decorum at public meetings. But while his wife has been protesting for Hamas terrorists at various events, he was removed from a private meeting that he crashed and disrupted. That story is here:

Listen to Michael Dukes and his Thursday monologue about Butt Gate:

Facebook video link here.

Available on Podcast here:

https://open.spotify.com/episode/28l3vPjlFnDxeV2V5heKQg?si=35a6dc60294c481a

Michael Dukes’ website: www.michaeldukesshow.com

Mexico-based air cargo company gets OK to come to Anchorage International Airport

25

Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport is known as a cargo flight hub, one of the busiest in the world. This week, a new start-up air cargo based in Mexico received approval to begin serving in the U.S. and will be seen by plane-spotters coming and going from Anchorage.

Awesome Cargo joins about 47 air carriers — 27 domestic and 18 international — that come through Anchorage, with about 44 cargo destinations served.

Anchorage ranks third in the world for cargo transit through its airport and in 2023 Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport surpassed Shanghai Pudong Airport. About 3.461 million tons of cargo flies in and out of Anchorage annually.

Photo above shows an Awesome Cargo Airbus 330 landing on its first visit to Anchorage in July.