Monday, April 20, 2026
Home Blog Page 1191

Anchorage easing on church gatherings is result of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death

27

MUNI ATTORNEY EXPLAINS: NEW COURT HAS NEW FOCUS ON RIGHTS

By SCOTT LEVESQUE

Anchorage’s acting mayor retained her authority on Tuesday to keep the city’s economy locked down for the rest of the month.

Emergency Order 16 is on the books until at least Dec. 31 after an effort by Assembly members Jamie Allard and Crystal Kennedy failed to wedge open the strict business and personal freedom sanctions from the Administration.

Assembly members directed questions at the Austin Quinn-Davidson Administration about EO 16 and its effectiveness. After all, Assembly member Kennedy pointed out, Quinn-Davidson appears to have followed all of her own mandates and protocols, but she still came down with COVID-19.

When asked by Assembly Member Kameron Perez-Verdia whether the virus can be even controlled, Heather Harris, the director of the Anchorage Health Department, said it can, in fact, be controlled.

“Yes,” she said. “There’s ample research that shows that some of our primary mitigating factors is around wearing a mask, maintaining a distance, and washing your hands.”

“And so, as we evaluated options in these emergency orders it was really important to come back to that, and these measures are all informed by that baseline context around being able to maintain mask usage, keeping our distance, and washing our hands,” Harris said.

Harris’s explanation aligns with the CDC’s recommendations for reducing transmission in densely populated areas: Hand washing, masks, and social distancing are the main preventatives to lowering transmission.

If hand washing, masks, and distancing are the most critical factors in controlling the virus, why is Anchorage locking down its businesses? Assembly member Allard probed that riddle in a number of her questions of the Administration.

Allard, an opponent of the lockdowns, also asked the Administration why churches are allowed to be open (which Allard supports) while many congregations are clearly not following the restrictions outlined in Emergency Order 16. She was pointing out the regulatory dissonance in the order.

Harris summarized the emergency order’s recommendations for churches. Municipal Attorney Kate Vogel interjected during Harris’ response to expound on why the municipality is easing off of churches — it’s because of the U.S. Supreme Court’s shift back to the constitution, she said.

“With the new makeup of the United States Supreme Court, they did change course a little bit from where they’d been in the spring when they had Ruth Bader Ginsburg on the bench,” Vogel said.

“There is a new makeup of the court, and they elevated, as I said, the importance, the constitutional importance, of being able to gather for the purpose of worship.”

Assembly member Kennedy followed up with a comment that controlling the virus is not apparently working, arguing that closing down businesses within the Municipality only drives Anchorage residents to spend their money elsewhere — including the Valley — further damaging Anchorage’s own economy.

Attorney Vogel responded, saying it is Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s fault that people in Anchorage are going to the valley to shop and dine:

“I think, from a legal standpoint, I can only say we have a certain jurisdiction, and we can do what we can to stop spread within our jurisdiction. The governor could be taking stronger action. It [mask mandate] would be statewide, and it would alleviate some of these concerns about people going to the lowest common denominator in terms of finding the place with the least restriction and doing their shopping there.”

With that, the Municipal Attorney of Anchorage had just called the Matanuska-Susitna Borough the lowest common denominator because it doesn’t have a mask mandate or business closures.

Among other edicts, EO16 mandates that everyone in Anchorage limit their outings and physical contact with those outside their households. Gatherings are limited and people are to wear masks when in public.

Most damaging to livelihoods is that restaurant and bars are closed except for curbside pickup and delivery, and all businesses are ruled by EO 16’s reduced occupancy mandates.

The entire Emergency Order is at this link:

Assembly member Meg Zaletel, who is the subject of a recall attempt, said she could not support the amendment to remove a number of restrictions, because it “doesn’t feel strategic in nature.”

Breaking: Election integrity lawsuits filed in District 27

A group of voters in House District 27 has filed a challenge to the recount that was done in the General Election race, where UAA Professor Liz Snyder won over incumbent Rep. Lance Pruitt by 11 votes.

The group also filed a separate lawsuit challenging the decision of the Alaska Supreme Court to order an injunction prohibiting the requirement of a witness signature on absentee ballots for the General Election, due to COVID-19.

In the first case, the group alleges that a voting location in Precinct 915 was suddenly changed from Muldoon Towne Center to Begich Middle School. It was the second change of polling place. There was little notice and many voters were confused about where to vote. This precinct typically has been supportive of Rep. Pruitt over several elections.

The plaintiffs say that state law mandates that the Director of the Division of Elections must publish notices when voting locations are changed, putting the notices in a newspaper of general circulation, and in other places as well, and include the information in the final election pamphlet. That did not happen.

As a result of of the change of voting location, voters were disenfranchised, not given equal protection guaranteed by the 14th Amendment of the Constitution.

The other lawsuit, an election integrity complaint, says at least one voter had returned two ballots, one using his first name and one using his middle name. The lack of a requirement for a witness signature is a case of the courts making election law, something that only the Legislature can do.

Following what the plaintiffs are calling an unconstitutional elimination of the witness signature by the courts, the suit says the Division of Elections failed to develop a procedure for review of the signatures to ensure that the person casting the ballot signed the certificate.

The group is hinting it was unconstitutional given the recent Texas lawsuit against four states — Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin — where similar mid-election changes were made. The group has not sought review or injunction for the witness signature requirement.

The group, represented by elections lawyer Stacey Stone, is asking for a new election to be held in the District.

For the State of Alaska, Margaret Paton-Walsh has been assigned to defend the State.

The election integrity case will be of high interest to conservatives in Alaska, and may find its way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Two more legislators call on Dunleavy to join Texas in election integrity lawsuit

40

Mat-Su Valley Reps. George Rauscher and Colleen Sullivan-Leonard today requested Gov. Mike Dunleavy and Acting Attorney General Clyde Sniffen, Jr. to join in a lawsuit with Texas against the states of Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, due to violations of their own election laws that led to a win for Joe Biden.

That makes five Alaska lawmakers altogether who have put in a request to Gov. Dunleavy to join the lawsuit.

“There are major concerns by the people in the great State of Alaska regarding the recent elections. Irregularities in the election process in other states have … stripped all U.S. citizens of their constitutional, and legal, right to fair and just election for the presidency of the United States of America,” the two wrote.

“As pursuant to our oath of office to defend the Constitution of the United States of America and that of State of Alaska we, the undersigned, ask that you do the same, and support Texas in suing the States of Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for unconstitutional irregulates in the recent election process.

“Amongst other items, the suit asks the Supreme Court of the United States of America to extend the December 14, 2020 deadline for certification of presidential electors so that investigations into the irregularities can be completed by asking the court to ‘enjoin the use of unlawful election results without review and ratification by the defendant states’ legislatures.”’ 

The election statues were disregarded by courtrooms not only before, but also while the election was already in progress, which resulted in opportunities for fraud, the letter stated.

On Tuesday, three lawmakers from the Kenai Peninsula sent a letter to the governor — Reps. Sarah Vance, Ben Carpenter, and Rep.-elect Ron Gillham.

Seventeen states and Donald Trump have joined in the lawsuit, which University of Texas Law Professor Texas Steve Vladeck calls a stunt “relying on an obscure source of the Supreme Court’s power — its ability to hear disputes between states immediately without having them go through lower courts, known as “original jurisdiction.” But the claim at the heart of the suit has nothing to do with interstate relations — like a border dispute or litigation over water rights. Nor does it have anything to do with fraud. Rather, Texas is arguing that coronavirus-related changes to election rules in each state violate the federal Constitution, never mind that most states (including Texas) made such changes this cycle.”

Video: Rivera’s wild meeting as Assembly chair has man cuffed and tossed over shutdown objections

47

“He needs to be removed,” said Assembly member Chris Constant.

“He needs to be 86’d,” said Assembly member Pete Petersen, evidently wanting to get rid of the man for good. The Urban Dictionary says that this means he needs to be killed.

Neither Assembly member realized their mics were still hot.

And so he was removed. Dustin Darden, activist and frequent candidate for office, was ejected from the Loussac Library’s Assembly Chambers.

Darden was not only removed, he was taken away in handcuffs by armed police after an outburst at the public podium, in which he blasted the Anchorage Assembly for not honoring the wishes of the public concerning economic sanctions on businesses.

Darden has been a participant at Assembly meetings for many years. He has never cussed while at the podium. He has never gotten violent. When the mask requirement was enacted in the chambers, he simply wore a cardboard box over his head in protest.

Darden is active as a sponsor of two petitions to recall members of the Assembly.

No one ever remembers him being kicked out, much less in handcuffs. Former Mayor Ethan Berkowitz used to take a time-out and chat with Darden in the back of the room, man-to-man.

But during the dire shutdowns and the new behavior rules the mayor and Assembly have imposed in recent months due to its fear of the COVID virus, Darden has become more strident at times.

On Wednesday night, he was agitated because of the way the Assembly had treated a previous member of the public, who had yielded a portion of her three-minute time to Darden.

Assembly Chair Felix Rivera had lectured the woman about being respectful. Here’s the tape:

Rivera shut the mic off immediately after Darden started yelling from behind the Plexiglas screen that has recently been installed to protect the assembly from the spittle of the public. That triggered Darden.

Darden raised his voice louder. He was shouting, pounding the podium and demanding the Assembly reverse the crushing shutdown orders against the Anchorage business community.

Rivera called security to have Darden removed. And then, as if by magic, the police arrived. They approached Darden, who had taken his seat, and they talked to him. Then Darden rose, put his hands behind his back, and was escorted out the side door.

The government-controlled audio of the meeting was shut off for several minutes while the incident took place. There is no question that Darden was out of order for a public meeting, but did they need to call the police, the members of the audience wondered.

After all, Rivera this summer allowed two men to lie in front of him during an entire meeting. The men were protesting. And Rivera allowed a Black Lives Matter protester to yell profanities at the Assembly in a loud voice this summer, and only thanked the man for his testimony.

But Darden is someone Chair Rivera has no tolerance for.

“Every business owner in Anchorage owes Dustin Darden a thank you. He consistently shows up every single meeting fighting for them when they won’t even show up for themselves,” said Bernadette Wilson, a civic activist who also shows up at meetings and who has organized rallies, and who has also pointed at the Assembly members and yelled at them without being called out of order.

Darden was never booked, and it appears he was not charged either. But the speed that police showed up to haul him out of the Assembly Chambers was impressive to those witnessing the spectacle.

During another section of testimony by the public, Assemblyman Chris Constant also objected to citizen Tim Rooney, who was making fun of the Assembly, as he described the types of themed sandwiches that local restaurants have made in honor of them, such as “Recall Rivera Sandwiches,” and “Curmudgeon Constant Croissants.”

Rep. Stutes goes with Democrats in House

23

Creating a 20-20 split between Democrats and Republicans, Rep. Louise Stutes, a Kodiak Republican, once again chose to go with the Democrats.

She says they are in the majority.

The news was broken first by the Cordova Times, an online newspaper in her district. Must Read Alaska’s newsletter reported it soon after. Then a press release followed from the House Democrat-led majority.

Stutes told the House Republicans during a Zoom call meeting that she was staying with the Democrats. She appeared for a portion of the meeting to evidently make the announcement to the participants, and there was no persuading her, as she had a long list of must-haves for her district, which included fully funding the ferry system, fully funding power-cost-equalization for rural communities, and more.

“If you know me, you know that during my time in Juneau I’ve never lost sight of where I come from. Although a proud Republican for 50 years, I am first and foremost a representative of my district,” she said in her press release.

“Kodiak, Cordova, Yakutat, Seldovia and all District 32 communities in between are reliant on a healthy Alaska Marine Highway System, robust fisheries management, quality K-12 schools, public safety, community revenue sharing, and investment in infrastructure. It’s no secret that services rural Alaskans depend on have been disproportionately targeted for cuts. As a result, I’ve prioritized working with legislators who support those services and my district, regardless of party affiliation,” she wrote.

“It is critical now, more than ever, that we stand our ground to protect and restore our coastal communities.” – Louise Stutes

Notably, she did not mention her desire to protect the Permanent Fund or the dividend Alaskans are statutorily guaranteed each year.

“After giving it careful thought, I’m making it public that I’ll be caucusing with my colleagues in the current House Majority Coalition who share my vision for a vibrant rural, as well as urban Alaska.”

“By working together, I am confident we can build a bright future for all Alaskans,” Stutes wrote, before wishing everyone a merry Christmas.

It’s not a new betrayal. Stutes has caused for the past four years with the Democrats. But during the last two years, she had Reps. Bart LeBon, Tammy Wilson, and Steve Thompson of Fairbanks, Jennifer Johnson, Gabrielle LeDoux, and Chuck Kopp of Anchorage, and the late Gary Knopp of Kenai by her side.

LeDoux, Kopp, and Johnston were voted out of office, Wilson left early for a state job, and Knopp died in a plane crash and his and Wilson’s replacements are staunch Republicans. Which means all eyes are on Reps. Bart LeBon and Steve Thompson of Fairbanks, who have repeatedly promised they would not return to the Democrat fold this year.

And that means the House is still at a 20-20 split with neither group able to claim a majority.

Bill Sheffield to be awarded honorary doctorate by UAA

14

The University of Alaska Anchorage will award Democrat Gov. Bill Sheffield an Honorary Doctor of Humane Letters at the Fall 2020 commencement ceremony on Sunday, Dec. 13.

Born in Silverdale, Washington, Sheffield served in the United States Airforce during World War II, worked as a sales and service representative for Sears Roebuck, and was transferred by Sears to Alaska in 1953. He went into the hospitality business, establishing the Anchorage Inn. Eventually, Sheffield bought out his business partner, expanded his hotel holdings and grew his hotel empire to 19 properties in Alaska and the Yukon territories.

He was elected the fifth governor in 1982, and served one term. During his tenure, he oversaw massive infrastructure projects, including roads and water systems. He pushed through an unpopular bill that consolidated the state’s four time zones into two and is responsible for creating Alaska Standard Time. Sheffield also helped facilitate the purchase of the Alaska Railroad from the federal government and commissioned the construction of Spring Creek Correctional Facility in Seward.

During his tenure, he faced Senate impeachment hearings over an award of a $9.1 million noncompetitive lease to a company that was partly owned by a friend of Sheffield’s, Lenny Arsenault. In 2018, he authored a memoir, Bill Sheffield: a memoir, from the great depression to the Alaska governor’s mansion and beyond.

Sheffield is 90 and lives in Anchorage at a home that has been the location of many a political fundraisers for candidates from both sides of the aisle. He was recently spotted getting exercise at the Midtown Mall.

Read about the other honorees at this UAA link.

Pebble Mine and ANCSA’s intended framework for self-determination

27

 By LISA REIMERS

Many people have speculated that the Alaska Natives Claims Settlement Act, or ANCSA, was an experiment in federal Indian policy.

In 1971, Congress authorized Alaska Natives to select and receive title to 44 million acres of public land and $962 million dollars as a settlement of their aboriginal claim to land in the State of Alaska.

The ANCSA framework was unique because it mandated the creation of for- profit corporations – both at the regional and village level – to be the legal vehicle by which the government would compensate Native people in Alaska as well as return ownership of their land.

There has always been a negative connotation surrounding the idea of corporate ownership. Federal Indian policy prior to ANCSA involved settlements and treaties that created the reservation system– which meant that the land and assets were held in trust by the federal government and were therefore controlled by the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

While ANCSA corporations are for-profit corporations, the mission and guiding principles by which they operate is ultimately influenced by the Alaska Native values of their shareholders.

This means that ANCSA corporations are the ultimate decisionmakers when it comes to deciding if and how their land and natural resources should be managed to achieve economic prosperity for their shareholders. That is why I do not view ANCSA as an experiment. Instead, I view it as the ultimate framework for self- determination.

I say this because of the insight I have received from people who actually took part in the implementation of ANCSA. I am an original shareholder of Iliamna Natives Ltd. (INL), which is a village corporation that formed following the enactment of ANCSA. INL was conveyed 69,000 acres of land in and around the village of Iliamna.

Obviously, we are one of the closest landowners near the Pebble Project. My parents were one of the original founders of INL who decided that INL land should be protected until there is a project that we can use to leverage our land for the good of our shareholders.

A project didn’t come along until 2004 when Northern Dynasty approached us with the plans they were working on and they asked my parents to form a subsidiary of INL that could partner with Pebble to provide jobs to our shareholders in the region. That is when we formed the Iliamna Development Corporation (IDC), a wholly owned subsidiary of INL. I have spent the last 16 years of my life as a sitting board member of both INL and IDC, as well as working as the CEO of IDC.

I am still proud to say that IDC – because of the work we accomplished with Pebble – went on to hire hundreds of employees from the region. At one point, IDC was the single largest employer in the Lake and Peninsula Borough. The pride I felt stems from the fact that I believed this project was the opportunity we needed to fulfill the intentions of ANCSA for our shareholders. That is why INL signed a rights-of-way agreement with Pebble in 2019, allowing them the right to build a transportation corridor on our land.

INL submitted a comment asking the U.S. Army Corps to select an alternative that put the transportation corridor on our land. INL carefully selected the route for the transportation corridor because it avoided three things: culturally sensitive areas, subsistence use areas, and critical salmon spawning habitat. INL did this not only with our shareholders in mind, but also the general public’s interest. When the Army Corps announced their record-of-decision (ROD) for the Pebble Project, INL shareholders were shockedto read that the Corps denied the permit because “the proposed project is contrary to the public interest.”

I believe this statement is contrary to the core principles of ANCSA, which transferred decision the making authority regarding resource and land development to the corporations and their shareholders. Who is to say that the Army Corps won’t use public interest to deny a project on ANCSA land in the future?

Lisa Riemers is CEO of Iliamna Development Corporation.

Kenai lawmakers ask governor to join election lawsuit with Texas

49

Three Kenai Republicans have asked Gov. Mike Dunleavy to join in a lawsuit filed by the attorney general of Texas against four states — Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin — over elections.

“Trustworthy elections are a cornerstone of our constitutional republic,” they wrote. “Recent action by our judicial branch, with the effect of allowing absentee ballots to be accepted without a witness signature, is contrary to state law. The judicial branch has no constitutional authority to change state law in this matter.”

Signed by Reps. Ben Carpenter, Sarah Vance, and Rep.-elect Ron Gillham, the letter asked the governor to direct Acting Attorney General Ed Sniffen to join in the Texas lawsuit.

Texas AG sues swing states for changing election rules at last minute, same thing Alaska courts did in October

51

Texas has sued Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin over “unconstitutional irregularities” in the election process.

In a case filed with the U.S. Supreme Court, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton says that the four states used the coronavirus pandemic to ignore state laws that govern absentee and mail-in voting.

At issue is that judges in the four states did away with security measures, among them signature verification and absentee ballot witness requirements. They also reduced election security by eliminating poll watchers.

The four states are the battlegrounds that President Trump won in 2016, but lost this year. Each modified their voting procedures in violation of their own state laws, the suit alleges.

Because those states are the key electoral votes that will determine the presidency, the lawsuit is throwing another wrench into the electoral vote calendar. The Electoral College is set to meet on Dec. 14 to cast their votes.

Alaska’s election procedures were also changed via a ruling by the Alaska Supreme Court. In October, after ballots had already started to be cast in the General Election, the high court ruled that the witness requirement for absentee ballots is unconstitutional during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The decision went in favor of the lawsuit brought by the ACLU-Alaska on behalf of the Native American Rights Fund, American Civil Liberties Union, and Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.

The ACLU-Alaska said that the witness signature “serves no legitimate purpose,” an indication that the lawsuit group may try to make this a permanent injunction against the witness requirement for mail-in ballots.

The Alaska Supreme Court’s ruling was not challenged by the Texas Attorney General because there are only three electoral votes for Alaska, not enough to swing the election this year.

Georgia is worth 16 electoral votes, Pennsylvania has 20, and Michigan and Wisconsin have 16 and 10 — enough to tip the scale for Biden.

Also on Tuesday, the U.S. Supreme Court has turned down an emergency request from Rep. Mike Kelly, Republican of Pennsylvania, and other Republicans who sought to decertify the Pennsylvania election results, which member of Congress and other GOP activists to overturn President-elect Joe Biden’s win in Pennsylvania.