Tuesday, May 6, 2025
Home Blog Page 941

Norton Sound Health Corp mandates Covid vaccines, and it appears is losing dozens of employees over the requirement

62

Norton Sound Health Corporation has mandated that all of its workers, board members, and volunteers must be vaccinated for Covid-19 by Monday, June 14, or they will be placed on unpaid leave. If they still don’t comply, they will be fired.

In a letter to employees in May, CEO Angie Gorn outlined the new rules, which are to prevent the spread of the virus to patients and coworkers in the NSHC region, which includes Nome.

The policy applies to all board members, employees, contractors, students, and volunteers, Gorn said.

Also, any booster vaccines that the CDC recommends will be mandatory and there are no religious exemptions, only medical exemptions that must be approved by the corporation’s medical director.

“If you have not yet taken the Covid-19 vaccine, you will have until Monday, June 14, 2021, to show proof of your first dose. Any employee who remains unvaccinated by Monday, June 14, 2021, will be placed on unpaid admin leave for a period of 30 days. During this wait period, NSHC will not pay for any housing, bonuses, reimbursements, or incidentals on behalf of the employee. Failure to comply with the mandatory COVID-19 vaccine policy after 30 days, will result in termination of employment (unless a medical exemption is granted),” Gorn wrote.

Must Read Alaska has learned that there are several people working for the corporation who have chosen to leave, due to the new policy. By several, our sources say, there may be over 20 employees leaving or forcing the corporation to fire them.

But those who would be hired to replace them must be vaccinated, according to Gorn’s letter.

“Any ‘new hire’ offers of employment will be contingent on the applicant’s current COVID-19 vaccination status or willingness to receive the COVID-19 vaccine two days after new hire orientation.  Any new or existing contractor, volunteer, and/or student must also comply with this policy,” she wrote.

Getting qualified health care workers to move to Nome is not an easy task. Health care workers are in high demand all over the country, so NSHC will be competing for those specialized workers — nurses, technicians, and therapists, for example, and may not have the ability to compete due to the remote nature of the communities the corporation serves.

On the NSHC vacancy list, for example, there are eight openings for lab workers, five nursing positions open, and 11 vacancies in behavioral health, just a few on the list that the company seeks to fill.

Adding another 20-25 vacancies to that list of more than 50 specialists needed could imperil the health of Alaskans from Shishmaref to Stebbins, and from Gambell to Diomede.

Jim Crawford: Concerning the PFD, just say no to special interests this year and next

17

By JIM CRAWFORD

Eddie Burke and I co-chaired the statewide “Just say No” campaign in 1999 to save the Alaska Permanent Fund. The people understood that earnings were vital to the success of their 1976 Amendment to protect the Alaska Permanent Fund. 

Simply, the earnings from the fund would make dividends sustainable. They also understood that the Permanent Fund was established for all Alaskans, each and every one of us. All the talk we heard then and now was and is only meant to let the special interests spend the Fund.  We said NO then and we must reinforce that NO again this year.

We must reestablish Permanent Fund dividends at 50% of net income after inflation proofing. We then are assured of two things:  1. The dividend is sustainable and 2. Fund managers will maximize the earnings and growth of the Fund.  This is the capitalist philosophy that built America.

The sustainable approach to the PFD limits spending from the Fund to 50% of earnings less inflation. The experiment called the Percent of Market Value failed and resulted at year end FY 2020 in reducing the Fund balance by nearly $1 billion after the POMV draw was made. The balance of the Fund went down by $998 million under POMV while our dividends crashed after the Legislators got done carving up the POMV draw.  

Eighty percent for government and 20 percent for the Alaska owners of the fund is not fair. The people’s dividend was their last priority.  

In the last election, voters removed nine senior incumbents in the Legislature who opposed the people’s plan. Have we elected a majority that supports our majority? The people’s plan was supported by 83% of the voters in 1999.  I’ll bet that majority hasn’t gone down 5 points, even with the constant pounding of the news media and the big spenders.

Past Legislatures have proven they cannot enact a long-term fiscal plan. The people, therefore, must do it for them through constitutional amendments just as Gov. Mike Dunleavy has urged. If we can’t get the votes in the Legislature to pass constitutional protection, let’s have a constitutional convention and approve them that way.  We must bring back accountability in Alaska’s budgetary battles.

If the Legislature again blocks protection of our dividend and the Fund itself, there is a provision in the state constitution that allows the public’s voice to be both heard and obeyed. The people, not the Legislature or the courts, have the power to overrule and enforce any provision that is passed by a simple majority vote in a properly called Constitutional Convention. You could call it the people’s final trump card.

Let’s prepare for a constitutional convention. The last time, voters were asked if they wanted to convene a constitutional convention was in 2012. This plebiscite is required every 10 years.  The 10 years is up next year, in 2022. The plebiscite question must be on the ballot every 10 years, according to Article XIII our Alaska Constitution.

Section 3, Article XIII of the Alaska Constitution says, “Constitutional conventions shall have plenary power to amend or revise the constitution, subject only to ratification by the people. No call for a constitutional convention shall limit these powers of the convention.”

This is the ultimate take back of government by the people.  If voters want to protect their dividends and the corpus of the Fund, we can do so.  If a majority votes to hold a Constitutional Convention, we will have one.  That convention can solve a number of Alaska’s problems. Together, we can build a grand coalition of people who understand that in Alaska, the People control government, not the other way around. 

Those in the Legislature who align with the people’s interest will enjoy huge support. Those who are satisfied with the short shrift given to dividend supporters to sustain “Jabba the Hutt” government will be accountable to the People.

Here’s the deal:

1. Set the dividend at 50% of Fund earnings less inflation proofing.

2. Cap draws and never exceed the earnings of the Fund less inflation.

3.  Constitutionally protect the whole Fund.

4.  Cancel the POMV and adopt a strict actual earnings discipline.

5.  Provide an effective spending cap that limits the expansion of Alaskan government.

6.  Require a majority vote of Alaskans to raise taxes or reinstate the Alaska income tax.

If you read the financial statements of the state and our agencies, you quickly understand that we have billions tucked away and yet spenders demand more. I still don’t know what our state and local governments did to spend an additional, federal covid gift of $6.5 billion in the last fiscal year.

The only ones getting stiffed are those Alaskans who get their earnings in the form of dividends.  Alaskans are smart.  We decided and voted decades ago to save and invest our earnings in resource development through the Alaska Permanent Fund.  Our savings are growing. Thanks to all who took part in making the fiscal plan to turn barrels of oil into barrels of renewable cash.  It worked.

Let us convince our friends in the Legislature to make the best deal for Alaskans.  And thank them for investing our savings.  Our little fund now has $81 billion and earned $16 billion so far this year.  

Jim Crawford is a third-generation Alaskan entrepreneur who resides in Anchorage with his bride of 37 years, Terri.  Capital Alaska LLC is a capital funder which studies and reports on and may sponsor projects of sustained economic growth for the Alaskan economy.   Mr. Crawford known as the Permanent Fund Defender was a member of the Investment Advisory Committee, appointed by Governor Hammond to plan and execute the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation.

Don Young releases infrastructure framework he hopes gets bipartisan support

12

Alaska Congressman Don Young released an infrastructure framework on Thursday that he hopes will earn bipartisan support and bolster America’s infrastructure for years to come.

“This week, talks between the White House and my Senate colleagues have broken down. This impasse appears not only to be over the definition and price tag of an infrastructure package, but also over how to pay for it. I understand that this is a sensitive topic, but I am prepared to have this conversation. The Congress should not move forward via the budget reconciliation process, and it is my hope that President Biden will not give up on negotiations,” Young said.

Young’s plan would spend $1.25 trillion on these components:

Surface Transportation Reauthorization Legislation (Roads, Bridges, Safety, Transit, and Rail) – $500 billion

  • The current authorization expires at the end of this fiscal year. Congress should negotiate and pass a bipartisan 5-year surface transportation reauthorization through regular order that provides long term solvency for the Highway Trust Fund.
  • The bill should include a onetime increase to the federal motor fuel excise tax for gasoline and diesel to account for post-1993 inflation, and index it to the CPI thereafter.
    • Part of the controversy over how much to invest and where to invest in our nation’s transportation system will be alleviated by putting the Highway Trust Fund on a trajectory for long term solvency.
    • According to the Congressional Budget Office, beginning in FY 2008, and in each subsequent fiscal year to date, Highway Trust Fund outlays have exceeded revenues received. As a result, Congress has transferred approximately $157 billion to the fund from the general fund of the Treasury and other sources.
  • The bill should address the issue of electric vehicles by requiring that the Department of Transportation study and implement the phasing in of a user fee for passenger and commercial electric vehicles over a period of five years. 
  • Additionally, the bill should require that DOT study and implement a plan for how gas, diesel, and alternative fuel vehicles should be transitioned away from the fuel excise tax to a user fee over a period of no more than 10 years. 
  • The bill should also include project financing along with delivery and permitting reforms to ensure that additional federal investments are not mired in bureaucracy and litigation.
  • Addressing the solvency of the Highway Trust Fund will give users and states long-term certainty to finance projects and plan investments.

Supplemental Appropriations for Infrastructure Investments (Airports, Ports & Waterways, Water Infrastructure, Electrical Generation & Grid Modernization, Broadband, and  Congressionally Directed Project Spending) – $750 billion

  • Both the Republican Roadmap and the American Jobs Plan have not met a middle ground on the amount of new federal spending and how to pay for it. Young says his framework seeks to find this middle ground.
  • The bill should include an increase in the corporate tax rate, excluding small and family owned businesses, to offset some of the cost of this additional spending. The rate increase would be limited to no more than a 4% increase to a rate of 25%.
    • Small and family owned businesses will be exempted from this increase.
    • Congress should recognize that there is wisdom in the “user pays user benefits” principle. Corporations benefit from and are users of America’s infrastructure. The benefits of a modernized national transportation system over the long term will outweigh the costs of a rate increase.
  • Congress should allocate a portion of the $750 billion for congressionally directed spending on projects in their states and home districts.
    • Members of Congress are closest to their constituencies and understand their needs better than the federal government agencies that currently award federal infrastructure monies through existing formulas or competitive grant programs.
    • The return of Community Project Funding in the FY22 Appropriations Process and Member Designated Projects for the Surface Transportation Reauthorization bill have drawn significant interest from members and when paired with strong disclosure and ethics requirements these are a valuable and way to demonstrate the value of federal investment in member’s districts.  

Meanwhile, on the Senate side, a group of 10 senators will begin negotiating with President Joe Biden, who wants infrastructure money to pay for day care and elder care, which have never before been considered infrastructure.

Read Murkowski and 9 senators take infrastructure plan to White House

Murkowski and bipartisan Senate group say $1.2 trillion infrastructure plan would work

13

After talks between the White House and Republicans broke down on Monday, a bipartisan group of senators has agreed to offer President Joe Biden a $1.2 trillion, eight-year infrastructure package. It’s their first offer in what is expected to be a negotiated deal that will satisfy both sides of the aisle.

The group includes five Republicans and five Democrats: Republican Alaska U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, Mitt Romney of Utah, Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, Rob Portman of Ohio, Susan Collins of Maine and Democrats Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona, Jon Tester of Montana, Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, and Mark Warner of Virginia.

Their offer is far less than the $1.7 trillion plan from the Biden White House, which fell apart when Sen. Shelley Capito of West Virginia, who led the Republicans, got the call from Biden that talks were done.

Biden has sought to redefine “infrastructure” as including social programs such as day care and elder care, but the 10 senators who he will negotiate with have limited their offer to just regular infrastructure programs like roads and bridges, sources said.

“We are discussing our approach with our respective colleagues, and the White House, and remain optimistic that this can lay the groundwork to garner broad support from both parties and meet America’s infrastructure needs,” the 10 senators said in a joint statement on Thursday.

Win Gruening: Cruise ship tourism, moving forward or looking back?

By WIN GRUENING

The unsuccessful effort to gather sufficient signatures for three proposed initiatives limiting cruise visitors to Juneau was a welcome relief to many.  

Cruise Control, the group seeking these changes to the Juneau City Charter, claimed they gathered a “substantial number of signatures” but declined to reveal how many.  The group blamed their failure on the pandemic, the weather, and what they termed “an intense suppression campaign” by Protect Juneau’s Future, a group supported by a wide range of individuals and organizations opposing the measures, including local businesses, a number of Juneau Assembly members, Native corporations, unions, and civic leaders. 

The excuses offered overlook the initiatives’ harmful economic consequences that weighed heavily on voters’ minds and surely influenced their decision not to sign the petitions.

Most Juneau residents understand that a healthy economy requires trade-offs, and solutions won’t be found by going backwards as it appears Cruise Control prefers to do.

Now Cruise Control wants the Assembly “do the right thing” by adopting ordinances restricting hours for cruise ships and not allowing ships on Saturdays and in evenings, the very same ideas that were summarily rejected by the community.  Cruise Control also continues to refuse to acknowledge the work done by the Assembly-appointed Visitor Industry Task Force or by the Tourism Best Management Practices program.

Indeed, the Visitor Industry Task Force report recommendations, including whether a fifth cruise ship dock should be built in Juneau, would address concerns expressed by Cruise Control.  Several recommendations, in particular, are worth noting.  

It may seem counterintuitive, but the Norwegian Cruise Line dock proposal, endorsed with a variety of caveats, will help reduce congestion downtown.  If properly permitted with a Memorandum of Understanding, a fifth dock would divert passengers from the downtown core and reduce bus traffic through the center of town.

The new dock will accommodate a single cruise vessel on one side of the pier with the Coast Guard and NOAA utilizing the other side.  The dock will be built perpendicular to shore so as not to obstruct the view plane and would be equipped with electric shore power.  As envisioned, it will be a world class venue, incorporating the long-planned Alaska Ocean Center, a connecting seawalk, and local retail and cultural activities.  Below grade parking for buses will provide for public green space and waterfront access.

As important,  associated recommendations signal that “hot berthing” of large cruise vessels would no longer be allowed and capacity in Juneau’s harbor will be limited to 5 large cruise ships per day – with the requirement that an additional ship at anchor be limited to a small ship – the currently proposed definition of which are those carrying fewer than 500 passengers. 

Effectively, this means, even with an additional dock, there would be no net increase in large cruise ship capacity.

Other recommendations, including prohibition of cruise ships docking in Auke Bay’s Statter Harbor and the potential permitting of tourism activities to avoid over-crowded venues, will serve to moderate growth during peak periods.

All the recommendations in the Visitor Industry Task Force report deserve consideration and the Assembly should waste no time evaluating and acting on them.  Cruise ship itineraries for 2023 are being finalized now so 2024 may be the earliest schedule that can realistically be influenced.  Even before deciding on a detailed plan to address cruise ship capacity, the Juneau Assembly can, at a minimum, pass broad resolutions that state their intentions, so businesses and the cruise industry have time to adjust.

While action on these recommendations is important, the public should recognize that, ultimately, long term solutions include creating additional experiences and activities for visitors to enjoy.  This will require the Assembly to continue improving and expanding infrastructure to allow Juneau’s entrepreneurial spirit to flourish elsewhere in the borough.  

As an example, enhancing summer activities at Eaglecrest, building the second channel crossing and completing the West Douglas Road would all serve as catalysts for new recreational and cultural opportunities for the benefit of both residents and visitors.

The best solutions will always be attained by moving forward, in a positive, not punitive way  That’s how Juneau will not only remain a great place to visit, but more importantly, a great place to live.

After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening began writing op-eds for local and statewide media. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations and currently serves on the board of the Alaska Policy Forum.

Rep. Jim Jordan to FBI director Wray: ‘Why did you take the Homer couple’s copy of the Constitution?’

31

Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio grilled FBI Director Christopher Wray about why, during a raid of a Homer, Alaska home belonging to a pair of Trump supporters, the agency took the couple’s pocket copy of the U.S. Constitution.

Jordan’s questions about the FBI raid took place during a House Judiciary Oversight Committee meeting concerning events of Jan. 6, when election protesters surged into the U.S. Capitol.

Paul and Marilyn Hueper were held at gunpoint and handcuffed for four hours on April 28, 2021, while the FBI and other law enforcement agencies searched their home, looking for House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s laptop computer, as well as any evidence, such as clothing, that would show Marilyn Hueper was actually inside the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6.

It was a case of mistaken identity gone quite wrong.

According to Rep. Jordan, the Hueper’s door has now been repaired, after having been broken down by the agency raiders. The Huepers say the door has a plywood patch on it, but has not been repaired and still has a visible hole.

Wray had no answers about that raid. He said he would not discuss any investigation, he said.

The FBI has returned the couple’s cell phone and laptop, but Rep. Jordan wanted to know if the FBI had retained the data from their electronic equipment. Wray would not answer that either, nor discuss why the Constitution was taken into evidence.

Read: FBI breaks into Homer couple’s home, looking for Nancy Pelosi laptop

Marilyn Hueper said the pocket Constitution was the kind a person could find for a dollar. It hadn’t been read and the binding had not been broken, but was something she had pulled out of a box in a closet with the thought that she should read it and refresh her constitutional knowledge. There were no markings in it, “but they confiscated it and put it in as part of the evidence against us.”

The copy has been returned to the Huepers, unblemished.

The computers that were returned to them, however, are now damaged with “screwed up security settings,” Paul Hueper said, so the Huepers have not been able to actually use them.

“This has hurt our spa business,” he said, because the computers are an integral part of their business at the inn they keep in Homer, which has a lot of seasonal trade.

The Huepers have now filed a written rebuttal to the application for a warrant made to the U.S. District Court. They say the assertions made in the warrant application show no probable cause, and the warrant was granted based on flimsy information.

Twelve agents, FBI, Capitol Police, and other agents, broke down the door to their home and told Marilyn and Paul Hueper to put their hands up on April 28, 2021. Paul counted seven guns trained on him when he came out of the bedroom. The agents cuffed the couple and their guests and held them, interrogated them, and searched the home.

Finally, they showed Marilyn a photo of someone they said was her.

“They showed me a different view, where it could have been me,” Marilyn said. The photo was a side shot where only the hair and coat were visible. “They purposely withheld the picture where I could have easily seen it was not me.” Eventually they showed her the photo above on the right — at the end of their search — where the person-of-interest’s face was clearly shown.

“I said oh no, that is not me, I would have never worn that sweater,” she said. “She is wearing this hideous sweater that I would never be caught in. She has detached earlobes, and mine are attached. She has arched eyebrows, and I don’t.”

Marilyn Hueper said the agents told her she had been positively ID’d. Marilyn said that Wendy Terry, special agent in Anchorage, went to Matthew Scobel, the federal magistrate judge in Anchorage, for a warrant based on the positive ID.

“At this point, they said it was a trespassing misdemeanor but if we did not cooperate, they said they would charge me with obstructing justice,” she said.

When Marilyn said, “That’s not me,” she said the agent told her “so you want to go there,” as if she was lying and obstructing justice.

The couple is inviting others who have been harassed by law enforcement over their innocent activities on Jan. 6 to consider joining a lawsuit with them to challenge the FBI over the constitutional violations committed by the agency. People can get more information and contact the Huepers through WethePeopleStand.org.

Breaking: Grand jury indicts former Rep. Gabrielle LeDoux for voter fraud

46

A grand jury indictment against former Rep. Gabrielle LeDoux was announced today by the Alaska Department of Law.

Earlier this year, two misdemeanor election-tampering charges against LeDoux were dropped, but eight charges remained, and a hearing was set for later this month.

LeDoux, an Anchorage Republican who represented District 15 (JBER-Muldoon), along with Lisa Vaught Simpson and Caden Vaught all face various charges relating to LeDoux’s 2014 and 2018 House races. Simpson had been LeDoux’s chief of staff in the Legislature and sometimes roommate in Juneau. Caden Vaught is her son.

“On June 2, 2021, an Anchorage grand jury indicted Gabrielle LeDoux, Lisa (Vaught) Simpson, and Caden Vaught on multiple counts of voter misconduct in the first degree. These charges stem from the investigation that started in 2018 after the Division of Elections identified some irregularities in some of the absentee ballot applications and absentee ballots returned for the primary election for House District 15.  The Alaska State Troopers, in conjunction with the Federal Bureau of Investigations, conducted the investigation,” the Department of Law wrote.

Among the suspicious voting patterns in District 15, ballots were requested by seven people who were dead, and several other people say they never cast a ballot, although ballots were received by the Division of Election in their name.

An investigation was started by the State Troopers, and the case was also referred to the FBI. Previous charges included allegations that the three were principles and accomplices who knowingly provided false information on voter registration forms to show a residence address in House District 15, when there is evidence that Simpson and Vaught were not living, and had no intent to live, at the addresses provided at the time of the election. 

The previous charging documents also alleged that LeDoux solicited a similar action by other individuals in 2014 in order to ensure they could vote in the House District 15 election. But the grand jury is focused on the 2018 election, when the Division of Elections found numerous ballots linked to a single address.

“The charges involve alleged conduct that took place in both the 2018 primary and general elections. Ms. LeDoux and Ms. Simpson were each indicted on five counts of voter misconduct in the first degree and Mr. Vaught was indicted on four counts of voter misconduct in the first degree.  On June 10, 2021, all three defendants appeared, either in person or by phone, in court at a Superior Court arraignment and entered pleas of not guilty to the charges.  The date of their next court appearance has yet to be set.”

If convicted, the defendants could face a maximum of 5 years in prison.

Read: Rep. LeDoux says charges against her are FAKE NEWS

Read: LeDoux faces charges for District 15 voter fraud

Read: Charlie Chang now dead, LeDoux says

LeDoux ran for reelection in 2020, but lost in the primary to David Nelson, a young, clean-cut Republican new to election politics. She has maintained her innocence throughout, but the Hmong community in District 15 lost faith in her, and withdrew their important endorsement.

This story will be updated. Check back.

Unanimous: Anchorage Republican Women resolve to support Tshibaka for Senate

17

At the annual salad lunch of the Anchorage Republican Women’s Club, a powerhouse subset of the Alaska Republican Party, a unanimously supported resolution was announced saying the club is requesting the party’s State Central Committee endorse Kelly Tshibaka for U.S. Senate.

Tshibaka was the keynote speaker at the luncheon, which included attendees Mayor-elect Dave Bronson former Lt. Gov. Loren Leman, former Rep. Alyce Hanley, former State Senate President Drue Pearce, Rep. David Nelson, Rep. Tom McKay, former Rep. Sharon Jackson, and Eagle River Assemblywoman Jamie Allard.

Club President Judy Eledge read the resolution, which stated that the Alaska Republican Party had censured Sen. Murkowski, had vowed to find someone else to run as a Republican, and had asked Murkowski to not run as a Republican. The resolution also said that the club had fully vetted Tshibaka in accordance with party rules.

“We endorsed her,” said Eledge, explaining the resolution.

This is the second Republican women’s club in the state to endorse Tshibaka. The Republican Women of the Kenai passed a similar resolution several weeks ago.

The State Central Committee meets on July 10 in Fairbanks, where the matter is likely to be on the agenda. At the last meeting in March, 70 percent of the party voted against Murkowski and in favor of finding a new Republican candidate for Senate. Two weeks later, Tshibaka threw her name in the ring.

Read: New poll shows Tshibaka beating Murkowski and Gross on ranked-choice ballot

Legislative update: A tax is on the table, and a new ‘dividend fund’ plan is heard, conference committee stagnates

35

House Judiciary Committee on Wednesday heard alternative plans to the governor’s proposal to put the Permanent Fund dividend matter before voters.

Sen. Natasha von Imhof presented her plan, which is a competing concept to Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s, and would take $6.7 billion from the Alaska Permanent Fund, create a new fund, and pay dividends to the public that would start at about $500. According to her analysis, it would not require a broad-based tax.

When she got pushback on the fact that the smaller dividend is, in fact a tax on the people, she explained that it’s not a tax, it’s just “less free money.”

The dividend from the new fund would be up to 5 percent of the new fund’s market value, the same as used through the SB 26 formula to establish the maximum allowable draw from the Permanent Fund. It would operate as a mini-fund dedicated to dividends only, leaving the corpus of the Permanent Fund untouched and the spendable portion of the Permanent Fund just for government.

Von Imhof sits on Senate Finance, which has so far ignored Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s plan to essentially return to the 50-50 dividend calculation from the available portion of the Permanent Fund, which is a statute that has been ignored since 2016, by putting the formula in the Alaska Constitution; this would require a vote of the people. His plan, Senate Joint Resolution 6, was part of his call for the special session. Critics say it would also require a tax and they want him to propose a full fiscal plan to make the numbers work.

House Judiciary also heard Rep. Adam Wool’s proposal for a 2.5% income tax and a dividend of about $1,000. That plan, along with von Imhof’s, appears to have little broad-based support in the Legislature.

Meanwhile, the first Senate Finance hearing on the governor’s plan, SJR 6, is scheduled for Friday at 1:30 pm.

Read: Way-back machine: What voters advised lawmakers to do in 1999 when asked about using the Permanent Fund for government

Special session ends on June 18 and with one week to go, there is no operating budget, no capital budget, no mental health budget, and no Permanent Fund dividend. “Pink slips” indicating a possible government shutdown, would go out one week from today, on June 17.

House Bill 69, the operating budget, had $4.43 billion in state unrestricted funds when it was passed by the Senate for Fiscal Year 2022. The capital budget has $274.6 million, leveraging $1.9 billion in federal funds for roads, bridges, and other infrastructure.

The Permanent Fund’s Earning Reserve Account — the fund’s spendable portion — has more than $11 billion that is unencumbered, and the Legislature could transfer some of that into the constitutionally protected corpus of the Fund, to put it off-limits for spending, thus allowing the fund to grow faster. SB 26 limits the amount that can be used from the earnings reserve fund for government and the dividend.

The Legislature faces a challenge with the public because the Permanent Fund corpus balance is nearly $82 billion, just $18 billion short of what many legislators have said would be needed to never have to talk about broad-based taxes again.

To further the public perception challenge, at the beginning of the year, when the Permanent Fund was at $73 billion, the corporation’s own forecast said it would not reach $80 billion until 2030. Yet six months later it has blown past $80 billion.

Sources say that while the committee hearings have lightly dotted the special session calendar, the full House and full Senate are expected to meet on Monday, but conference committee work is the hold-up.