Home Blog Page 799

MRAK podcast: ‘Kill Zone’ Pastor Ben McBride asks, ‘What are people standing for at the end of the day?’

By JOHN QUICK | MUST READ ALASKA

Inspirational CEO and pastor Ben McBride appeared on the Must Read Alaska Show this month to discuss his ongoing community-building efforts and projects, from podcasting to being a part of a Sundance Film Festival Award winning documentary.

I met McBride 10 years ago at a pastors conference, during which a group of faith leaders discussed the need to have more members be physically present and available in the struggling communities of the inner cities around America.

Some pastors spoke in theory, but McBride was one of the few who had taken it upon himself to make a difference.

Oakland is one of those cities, a place ravaged by violence. McBride, a native of San Francisco, sought to do something beyond just praying. He moved his family from the San Francisco suburbs to East Oakland, where gun violence accounted for 60% of the city’s crime rate, earning it the name “Kill Zone.”

McBride recounted his first night there: While his wife was shopping for essentials for their new home, McBride heard gunshots. He dropped down and started praying. However, the shots continued and became more intense, in spite of his prayers. Eventually, he went outside to see what was going on, only to find out that the shots he heard were actually fireworks celebrating an event at the Oakland Colosseum.

Reflecting on the experience, McBride realized that he assumed he would be subjected to violence he’d heard about, but he could see that there were ways to bring happiness to the community, much as the fireworks did. 

Soon after moving to East Oakland, McBride got involved in the PICO organization, a faith-based non-profit devoted to helping struggling communities.

I asked him about his interest in working with this particular organization, and he answered that he wants to reduce the gun-related homicides that were gripping the community. He referred to the gun victims as “loved ones” due to their exposure to extreme violence at a very young age.

This work led him to create “Bring The Heat,” which focuses on bridging gaps in the community and the police to help build a better understanding from both sides. McBride was vocal about his experiences with law enforcement, from his brother being beaten on a college campus to being racially profiled himself in San Francisco. He did not let those experiences define him and he began working with the police station, even through moments of animosity. He told me how together they reduced the gun-related homicide rate by 50% and restructured how police approach these situations throughout the neighborhood. 

McBride said he supported defunding the police in mid-2020 at the height of the fallout from the death of George Floyd. But then he saw that just giving up on the institutions because no one wanted to do the work was counterproductive. It helped him realize that he needed to work with the police, not against them. Thus, he created Empower Initiatives.

His organization’s goal is to bridge differences among people of various backgrounds to find belonging wherever it may be, from private companies to public institutions. He separates himself from the usual concepts of diversity, equity, and inclusion as well as anti-racism. Instead, he uses questions, such as “What are people standing for at the end of the day?”

McBride believes people don’t need to try to change each other, but need to create a new social contract where they can respect each other’s values. Fostering environments of belonging is the crucial aspect of his mission with his company.

I asked him how his faith had influenced his work as a fellow man of God. He said he believes he is doing the job he is meant to do, fueled by love and the Holy Spirit.

“Everybody is redeemable. Nobody deserves to be thrown away, and there is a place at the table for every person, particularly the one with whom you disagree the most. So for me, the ethics around enemy love, the ethics around non-violence, the ethics around what does it mean to take off your cloak and split your resources with the ones who do not have. For me, fuels a lot of the work we do around belonging,” he said.

We concluded with a discussion about his feature at the award-winning Sundance Film Festival with “The Force,” which explored the police department of Oakland as it went through a scandal. The movie initially focused on the success of his efforts to help make the community a more harmonious society until the film’s production times aligned with the death of Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri. Brown was shot to death by police, which led to major rioting.

This incident caused a shift in the movie from him training the police department to leading a protest against the department after discovering that a young Latina woman was sex trafficked.

The film ends with Ben at odds with the Oakland police chief as he leads a large protest at the height of the “defund the police” protests that were happening all over the country.

However, as Ben stated, he seeks to now bridge the gap and work with these departments. Ben has since befriended the police chief and now works with him and others all over the country to help law enforcement departments. It’s easy to say “defund the police,” It’s easy to yell and riot. It’s hard to move into a community called the Kill Zone and work with law enforcement to help create a better solution.

Hear the Must Read Alaska interview with Ben Mcbride at this link.

http://www.benmcbride.com

Supreme Court leaves Title 42 border control policy from Trump era in place until it hears case in February

The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday said that a Trump-era border policy will remain in place until the court at least has a chance to hear the case in February. Title 42 is an emergency public health policy put into effect by President Donald Trump in 2020, suspending the entry of immigrants from certain countries in order to slow or prevent the spread of Covid-19.

In spite of the policy, millions of illegal immigrants have poured across the border during the nearly two years that Joe Biden has been president. More than three million illegal immigrants attempted entry into the country in 2022, the highest ever recorded.

Biden was set to rescind the policy this month and critics feared that the border with Mexico would become even more chaotic.

It was a split decision of 5-4 by the court and it overturned a District of Columbia court ruling that said Title 42 was arbitrary and capricious and therefore invalid. Eighteen states joined Arizona in appealing the lower court decision, and the conservative-leaning court ruled in their favor, allowing Border Patrol to expedite the expulsion of illegal immigrants. t

“Our office has been proud to lead the charge on this important issue,” Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich said in a statement. “It’s disappointing the Biden administration is willing to sacrifice the safety of American families for political purposes.”

Conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch joined the court’s left-wing minority of Justices Sonya Sotomayor, Elena Fagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson in their dissent from the majority decision.

Report: 3 in 10 adults now say parents, not schools, should have choice whether kids get usual childhood vaccinations

43

The decreasing trust in agencies and institutions in America has a new twist: With the growing wariness of public health authorities and the various disputes over the benefits of the Covid-19 vaccines, the public is now more hesitant about childhood vaccination schedules in general: More than four in 10 Republicans and Republican-leaning voters now say that they oppose school districts requiring that children get some historically given childhood vaccines, such as for measles, mumps, and rubella.

The study by Kaiser Family Foundation shows that nearly 3 in 10 parents now oppose the general vaccination requirements.

The report comes after over 80 children in Ohio have been diagnosed with measles. In 2021, only 49 cases of measles were reported across five jurisdictions in America; so far this year, the number has reached 117, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“Overall, nearly three in ten adults (28%) nationally now say that parents should be able to decide not to vaccinate their children for measles, mumps, and rubella rather than those vaccinations being required to attend public schools, up from 16% in a 2019 Pew Research Center poll conducted before the COVID-19 pandemic. Among parents, opposition to requiring those childhood vaccines now stands at 35%, up from 23% in 2019,” Kaiser Family Foundation says.

The KFF COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor survey reveals that parents’ opposition to requiring those childhood vaccines stands at 35%, up from 23% in 2019.

Most of the public is still on board with vaccinations for these dangerous childhood diseases, but the number supporting mandatory vaccinations for children is down to 71%, from 82% in 2019, before the Covid pandemic and the vaccines that came on its heels.

“The growing opposition stems largely from shifts among people who identify as Republican or lean Republican, with 44% now saying parents should be able to opt out of those childhood vaccines, up from 20% in 2019.  In contrast, the vast majority of Democrats and those who lean Democratic support requiring the vaccines for public school students (88%), little changed from 2019 (86%,” Kaiser said.

Also from the KFF report:

“Currently, all states and the District of Columbia require children to be vaccinated against certain diseases, including measles and rubella, in order to attend public schools, though exemptions are allowed in certain circumstances.

“Despite growing opposition to requiring childhood vaccines, the new survey captures modest shifts in the public’s view of their value. Today 85% of the public and 80% of parents say the benefits of the measles, mumps and rubella vaccines outweigh their risks, little changed from 2019, when 88% of the public and 83% of parents felt that way.

“Even among people who have not gotten a Covid-19 vaccine, a large majority (70%) say the benefits of these childhood vaccines outweigh the risks, though one in four (26%) say the risks outweigh the benefits.

“The new survey also finds that about four in ten adults report that they either have already gotten the recommended bivalent booster shot (22%) or say they will get it as soon as they can (16%). The bivalent booster targets both the original and omicron Covid-19 strains and has been available since September.

“Among adults ages 65 and older, who face higher risks from COVID-19, about four in ten (39%) say they have already gotten the bivalent booster, and another 16% say they intend to do so as soon as possible. Still, this currently leaves more than half of older adults without the protection of the bivalent booster.

“Democrats (38%) are much more likely than independents (18%) or Republicans (12%) to say that they’ve gotten the new booster.

Vaccinated adults who have not gotten a bivalent booster are largely skeptical about its value. Among this group, more than four in ten (44%) say they don’t think they need the new booster, and more than a third (37%) say that they don’t think its benefits are worth it. A similar share (36%) say they are too busy and haven’t had time to get it.

“Fewer cite other reasons such as bad side effects from earlier Covid-19 vaccines (23%), waiting to see if cases increase in their area (17%), or waiting until they travel or see vulnerable family and friends (12%).

“Among those ages 65 and older who are vaccinated but have not gotten the updated booster, about a third say that they don’t think they need it (36%) and that they don’t think the benefit of the updated booster is worth it (36%). About one in four (23%) say they have been too busy or have not had time to get the new booster yet.

“Most vaccinated Republicans or Republican-leaning independents who haven’t gotten the new booster say that they don’t think they need it (64%) or that its benefits are not worth it (61%).  Among vaccinated Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents who have not gotten the updated booster, the top reason is being too busy (51%).”

Parents of children ages 12-17 said just 16% of their children had received a Covid booster shot. Only 14% of children ages 5-11 have been boosted. Over half of the parents surveyed said they would not get their children vaccinated or boosted for Covid.

This survey showed that parents are now more worried their children will get sick from RSV (56%) or the flu (51%). About 47% of parents were worried about their children getting Covid.

Designed and analyzed by public opinion researchers at KFF, the Vaccine Monitor survey was conducted from Nov. 29 – Dec. 8, 2022, online and by telephone among a nationally representative sample of 1,259 adults, in English and in Spanish., the foundation reported. The margin of sampling error is plus or minus 4 percentage points for the full sample. For results based on other subgroups, the margin of sampling error may be higher.

Read more at the KFF Covid-19 Vaccine Monitor website at this link.

Do Americans trust their federal government? It depends on their political affiliation

31

Do you trust the federal government? If so, you’re in an increasingly rare, and decidedly Democrat-voting category. According to the State Policy Network’s latest poll, just 15% of Americans greatly trust the federal government. And 33% of voters somewhat trust the federal government.

That leaves the majority of Americans who say the country is heading in the wrong direction, with satisfaction with the country’s direction falling significantly since July, according to the poll of about 2,000 voters, conducted by Morning Consult through online interviews.

Democrats are 27 points more likely to trust the government than Republican voters. Sixty-one percent of Democrats trust the government, compared to 34% of Republicans.

Some other differences:

  • Trust in Congress: Democrats – 52%, Republicans – 36%
  • Trust in Supreme Court: Democrats – 42%, Republicans – 63%
  • Trust in Electoral Process: Democrats – 64%, Republicans – 42%
  • Trust in Own State’s Government: Democrats – 59%, Republicans – 54%
  • Trust in Own Local Government: Democrats – 62%, Republicans – 60%

Baby Boomers are the most likely to trust the federal government, at 49%, while the youngest voters polled, the Gen Z, trust it the least, at 38%.

In the Morning Consult poll, only half of Americans trust the Electoral process for the United States.

To see all the charts and data from the poll, visit Morning Consult at this link.

Twitter files: The real story is mainstream media ignoring how government, Twitter crafted the Covid doctrine

30

The latest stunning release of information from Twitter, the social media company now under the management of Elon Musk, is the biggest who-done-it of the year, and arguably more profound a news story than the Watergate break-in during the 1972 presidential election. You would not know it by the news coverage.

The Twitter Files now show that Twitter, at the request of the federal government, censored information that was true, helpful, and scientifically sound, but that was inconvenient to the U.S. government’s Covid-19 policies.

Twitter, which is one of the most influential forces in shaping news coverage, discredited doctors and other experts who disagreed with the government Covid’s doctrine. Pressured by the government, Twitter suppressed and eliminated the platform’s doubting Thomases, even those who were simply sharing the CDC’s own official data, or those posting out inconsistencies.

Major news agencies could not be bothered with the story back then, or even now, as under-new-management Twitter is spilling its guts about what happened.

The Twitter Files have come in waves this month. The New York Times gave a smearing of coverage to how Twitter, after being requested to do so by the Pentagon, kept online a network of secret accounts that the U.S. military used. News organizations reported, lightly and dismissively, how Twitter biased the election coverage for Joe Biden during the 2020 election, and suppressed — rather, censored — the Hunter Biden laptop story and possible criminal links to Ukrainian corruption.

A glossing of mainstream media coverage has described Twitter’s secret blacklists and how the company was functioning as a type of subsidiary of the FBI.

But when it comes to the files that show how Twitter censored Covid information the government didn’t agree with, it’s been crickets across many of the mainstream news outlets.

The latest tranche of information that shows just what a propaganda machine Twitter is was released by the online-only The Free Press, in the story “How Twitter rigged the Covid debate,” by David Zweig, (or at @thefp, on Twitter.)

“Internal files at Twitter that I viewed while on assignment for @thefp showed that both the Trump and Biden administrations directly pressed Twitter executives to moderate the platform’s pandemic content according to their wishes,” Zweig reported.

“At the onset of the pandemic, according to meeting notes, the Trump admin was especially concerned about panic buying. They came looking for ‘help from the tech companies to combat misinformation’ about ‘runs on grocery stores.’ But . . . there were runs on grocery stores.”

As it turns out, the Trump White House was also meeting with Google, Facebook, Microsoft, and others, Zweig wrote. This story is beyond the usual partisan divide — both White Houses were steering the behemoths of the Internet to sway public opinion and change public behavior.

The Biden White House was not only concerned about suppressing “anti-vaxxers” on Twitter, the administration singled out certain well-known people like Alex Berenson, a former reporter for the New York Times. Twitter killed his account in the summer of 2021, at the behest of the Biden Administration.

By that point, Twitter had become a state actor, a subsidiary of the federal government.

But it gets worse. Lauren Culbertson, Twitter’s Head of U.S. Public Policy, “wrote that the Biden team was ‘very angry’ that Twitter had not been more aggressive in deplatforming multiple accounts. They wanted Twitter to do more.”

After meetings with the White House, Twitter became more aggressive in moderating speech relating to Covid, suppressing views even from medical doctors and scientific experts who disagreed with the federal government’s official position.

“As a result, legitimate findings and questions that would have expanded the public debate went missing,” Zweig wrote.

The new Twitter, under Elon Musk and his quest for transparency, discovered that the prior management even had people in the Philippines moderating content relating to Covid.

“They were given decision trees to aid in the process, but tasking non experts to adjudicate tweets on complex topics like myocarditis and mask efficacy data was destined for a significant error rate,” Zweig wrote. “With Covid, this bias bent heavily toward establishment dogmas.”

“Inevitably, dissident yet legitimate content was labeled as misinformation, and the accounts of doctors and others were suspended both for tweeting opinions and demonstrably true information,” he continued, and used Dr. Dr. Martin Kulldorff, an epidemiologist at Harvard Medical School, as an example. Kulldorff tweeted views at odds with US public health authorities and the American left, the political affiliation of nearly the entire staff at Twitter. But Kulldorff’s tweet violated the Twitter policy on Covid-19 misinformation.

Kulldorff’s statements were an expert’s opinion, and in line with vaccine policies of numerous countries, but his opinions were deemed “false information,” by Twitter moderators because it was different from what the CDC was saying.

Kulldorff’s tweet was slapped with a “Misleading” label and all replies and likes were shut off, throttling the tweet’s ability to be seen and shared by many people, the ostensible core function of the platform, Zweig wrote.

Since Musk took over and his engineers started digging through the communication files from the last few years, the Twitter account of Stanford University professor of medicine Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, who was blacklisted for his thoughts on Covid-19 lockdowns and policies, was restored.

Also restored was the account of Dr. Robert Malone, an mRNA vaccine researcher, who the Twitter-government censors removed from the platform, even though he was part of the research team that invented the mRNA vaccine.

Dr. Peter McCullough, another Covid expert, cardiologist, and former vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and a professor at Texas A&M, has also had his account restored, as have a dozen other credible experts and journalists and researchers who simply questioned government lockdowns, vaccination policies, mask mandates, and official data, or who offered alternative treatment regimens.

Government got what it wanted in this anti-First Amendment activity — it got control. Media got what it wanted — attention. Businesses were paid off or threatened to shut up. Anyone who questioned too loudly was silenced, then fired, then cancelled. Trump doesn’t want to discuss this because much of it happened on his watch.

The entire scandal doesn’t fit neatly into the left/right paradigm, but it does fit into another paradigm: Controller vs. controlled, powerful vs. powerless, and the media vs. the truth.

People on the move

11

Crystal Koeneman: After serving for 18 legislative sessions as a legislative aide, Crystal Koeneman is now the legislative liaison for the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. She worked for lawmakers such as Senators Lyman Hoffman, Donny Olson, Bert Stedman, and Gary Stevens. She also worked for Representatives Nancy Dahlstrom, Mary Peltola, Sara Rasmussen, and Steve Thompson, among others. Her new boss is the commissioner of DEC, Jason Brune.

Gretchen Guess: Former State Rep. and Sen. Gretchen Guess is returning to Alaska to head up the Rasmuson Foundation, upon the retirement of longtime CEO Diane Kaplan. Guess is a born-and-raised Alaskan. Her father (Rep. Gene Guess) was a Speaker of the Alaska State House, and her mother was on the Regulatory Commission of Alaska. Guess worked in the Knowles administration, for Alaska Communications, and for Providence Alaska. She served on the Anchorage School Board before moving out of Alaska in 2013 to join St. Vincent’s HealthCare in Jacksonville, Fla. She starts at the foundation on Feb. 28.

Laura Bess Stidolph: Longtime legislative aide Laura Bess Stidolph is the new legislative director for Gov. Mike Dunleavy. She started her legislative career as front desk for Rep. Kurt Olson, serving the Kenai Peninsula. She also worked as a Transportation Committee Aide and bill runner for Representative Adam Wool of Fairbanks, Rep. Colleen Sullivan-Leonard of Wasilla, and House Speaker Bryce Edgmon of Dillingham. She then moved to the Governor’s Office as deputy legislative director, and then over to GCI.

Anna Dieterich: After seven years with Sen. Lisa Murkowski, Anna Dieterich has left the building, joining Covenant House International as the associate vice president of advocacy and policy. Covenant House is dedicated to ending child trafficking.

Lauren Noland: Another departure from Sen. Lisa Murkowski’s office is Lauren Noland. She worked for Murkowski for five months, and for Congressman Don Young for nine months and is a U.S. Army veteran.

Jim Matherly: Gov. Mike Dunleavy has appointed Jim Matherly to be his regional director in Fairbanks-Interior Alaska for the Office of the Governor. He was mayor of Fairbanks since 2016 and ran for Senate in 2022, but that seat went to a Democrat in a split-ticket situation. Matherly began working for the governor on Dec. 12.

Shareen Crosby: McKinley Management has a new chief of staff — Shareen Crosby, who worked as chief of staff to state Sen. Natasha von Imhof for the past seven years. She is working with McKinley’s executive team to develop Alaska business opportunities and provide project management, research, and writing support.

Jill McLeod: The new general counsel to McKinley Capital is Jill McLeod, who was previously a partner with Dorsey & Whitney, where she managed the law partnership’s Anchorage office. McLeod was in-house counsel for ConocoPhillips in Anchorage. She has over 25 years of international legal experience with expertise in finance, risk and compliance, and general corporate law in portfolios that include oil and gas, mining, telecommunications, and numerous other business concerns.

Ian Walser: Formerly with Alaska Growth Capital, Ian Walser is now the chief financial officer. He was Vice President of Alaska Growth Capital, as well as controller and compliance director. That company was bought from Arctic Slope Regional Corporation in September and is now one of McKinley’s business units.

Photo: Reywas92, Wikimedia

Christmas awaits!

29

Here we are at Christmas, 2022. We’re giving politics take a pause, and hope the defenders of liberty can take some time to celebrate the Savior and revisit the wonders of the world, as we share this rock spinning through space and time.

Thank you, all readers, commenters, critics, and friends, and financial supporters for making Must Read Alaska the lively, pithy, and force for good that it is. I appreciate all of you who participate in the great debates of the day — will tyranny be our destiny or will freedom ring? What does freedom look like? Will the Republic survive the madness of modern life?

The debate will continue. For a few days, I’ll be dialing it all back as best I can to spend time with family. I’m hoping that you can, too. After all, it’s Christmas! Let’s find that time for joy, time for peace, and time for kids, cookies, and cocoa after a good spell of shoveling snow. The worries of the world will still be there when we get back.

I hope you’re somewhere warm, but not too warm, and that you are as happy as a kid on Christmas morning, and with people who mean the world to you.

Merry Christmas to all!

— Suzanne Downing, Publisher

A rise in deadly Strep this winter may be linked to 2021 Covid lockdowns

59

 The science publication Nature is among others that are exploring the theory that Streptococcus A, a severe bacterial infection that can lead to death, is spiking in children due to the extended government lockdowns during the Covid pandemic that may have weakened their immune systems.

It’s a theory that a molecular microbiologist at the University of Sheffield, in the United Kingdom, says may have credence, since children who were locked down didn’t build up an immunity to Strep. Thirteen children in England under the age of 15 have died of Strep since September.

Strep usually starts as a sore throat and can end up as Scarlet Fever. It’s treated with antibiotics, but if not caught in time can cause meningitis, toxic shock syndrome, and flesh eating bacteria.

“There are a lot of things that seem to be a bit strange happening after the lockdowns,” Turner said. “But it’s hard to say whether that’s causing the surge right now, especially given that we have had surges prior to the pandemic.”

“To my knowledge, we’ve never seen a peak like this at this time of year, at least not for decades,” microbiologist Shiranee Sriskandan at Imperial College London told the publication.

It’s not just happening in England. A rise in Strep has been found in other countries, such as the Netherlands and the United States. Two young children in Denver have died from the illness, the CDC said in a Dec. 22 health alert.

The CDC warned in its health advisory “these severe and invasive diseases are associated with high mortality rates and require immediate treatment, including appropriate antibiotic therapy.”

Unfortunately, according to the CDC, there is a national shortage of the liquid antibiotic known as amoxicillin suspension, the drug most often prescribed to young children to treat group A strep infections. The shortage is anticipated to last several months.

An unusual rise in other diseases is also being seen, with exceptional surges in influenza, chicken pox, and respiratory syncytial virus, also known as RSV.

Alaskan of the Year: Kelly Tshibaka

58

Must Read Alaska readers have spoken, and say Kelly Tshibaka, who ran for U.S. Senate in 2022, is Alaska of the Year. Overwhelmingly.

Thirty-five percent of respondents to our poll, running for the past three weeks on Facebook, said Tshibaka is the most admirable Alaskan. She was followed by Mat-Su Borough Mayor Edna DeVries, Rep.-elect Jamie Allard, Rep. David Eastman, and Rep. Mike Cronk. Other Alaskans were mentioned, including Dr. Anne Zink, Dr. Ilona Farr, Gov. Mike Dunleavy, Anchorage Mayor Dave Bronson and even Rep. Mary Peltola and Sen. Lisa Murkowski.

Tshibaka announced her campaign to run for U.S. Senate against Murkowski in March of 2021. She fought tirelessly working each and every day on the campaign trail, coming from a relatively unknown candidate to a major threat to the Murkowski dynasty.

Due to the new voting system that made it an open primary, Tshibaka was not able to become the Republican Party’s sole nominee on the November ballot, even though she had the Republican Party’s endorsement, and Murkowski was censured by the party. In the end, Murkowski won, and Tshibaka came in second — 117, 299 votes to Murkowski’s 135,972 — after Murkowski picked up nearly all of Democrat candidate Pat Chesbro’s second votes in ranked choice voting.

Tshibaka, born and raised in Alaska, left for college in Texas and then graduated from Harvard Law School. She went to work for the federal government as an inspector general, fighting fraud in government, and married and started a family before moving back to Alaska to join the administration of Gov. Mike Dunleavy. Two years later, she was running against Murkowski for the Senate.

The 2021 Alaskan of the Year was Jamie Allard, then an Anchorage Assemblyman and now heading to the Alaska Legislature as a representative for Eagle River.