Jim Crawford: Sorting the good guys out from the bad guys and getting it right on the PFD this election

14
237


By JIM CRAWFORD

Let’s get it right this time in dealing with the Alaska Permanent Fund and its Dividend.

First, the calculation that worked for over 30 years was earnings-based. In other words, how much did the Fund earn over the last five years, less the inflation adjustment, divided by the number of qualified Alaskans? That amount was calculated in October of each year and paid shortly thereafter. Earnings-based dividends and averaging is the only calculation that is sustainable. You and I don’t get a dividend if we don’t have the earnings in the Fund. That’s good policy since we need to apply good investment decisions by our vendors. If the vendors don’t produce the earnings, we’ll get new vendors. Right?

Legislators began to tinker with the fund’s dividend almost immediately. They redefined the statutory income of the fund and said the dividend was not sustainable. Their solution was to create a new approach to calculating the dividend without the safeguards of earnings.  They called this, the “percentage of market value” and put in a 5% cap on the total value of fund that would be split between governmental expenses and the dividend.  

All this talk about overdrawing the Permanent Fund balance is garbage. If the Legislative Majorities set 5% of the Fund as the amount of transfer, then decide to use more than 50% of that amount for government services, they are cheating you and your family of your dividend. The Legislature, which created the problem, won’t solve it. Will voters trust those Legislators who stole from them previously?

As a banker for nearly 50 years in Alaska, I read financial statements. Let me quote you what the Legislative Auditor, Kris Curtis, had to say about how the Bill Walker Administration and the Legislative majorities dealt with responsibilities.  

Legislative Auditor Kris Curtis:

“State of Alaska’s General Fund rents and royalties are not reported in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and management declined to correct the misstatements. Misstatements include an unreported General Fund prior period adjustment of $199.0 million for overstated General Fund royalty revenues of $99.8 million in (fiscal year 2018) and $99.2 million in (fiscal year 2019), and an understatement of $199.0 million due to other funds,” Curtis wrote in her Independent Auditor’s Report to committee members dated Feb. 22.

The root cause was the decision by Walker officials to transfer mineral royalty revenues owed to the Permanent Fund Corporation and the Constitutional Budget Reserve to the General Fund instead, according to the audit report.  Then they swiped the $1.4 billion from the Constitutional Budget Reserve.  Auditor Curtis advised investors not to trust the financial statements of the State of Alaska. 

Read: Audit: state books off by at least $1.6B

If we can take the audit language and translate it into English:

Former Gov. Bill Walker and his legislative cronies stole nearly $200 million from the Alaska Permanent Fund Corp and you, because they wanted to spend the money on government instead of paying the dividend. Then they did it again for $1.4 billion to the Constitutional Reserve’s funds.  

Since its silly season for campaigns, we have former and current bureaucrats on the radio attempting to guilt trip us into giving up a reasonable 50/50 dividend, one that’s based upon a five-year average of earnings of the fund. 

They tell you that a normal dividend is overdrawing the Alaska Permanent Fund.  Not true.

They tell you that a normal dividend is unsustainable.  Not true.

They tell you that a normal dividend is unaffordable.  Not true.

And who are these liars? In the Legislature, they are led by former senator Cathy Giessel. When I was president of Permanent Fund Defenders, I met with Giessel, and she told a powerful story of conversion. She acknowledged that she voted against the dividend and related that her door-to-door canvassing had resulted in her conversion to an 100% advocate of the full dividend. She said we could count on her.  

She was reelected with the support of permanent fund advocates.  

Then she flipped again and now is an advocate of the percent of market value, which dissolved the connection between the performance of the Fund and the people’s 50/50 dividend.

To make matters worse, she’s again running for the Senate as a Republican. She co-Chairs Bill Walker’s campaign for governor and just got a $25,000 donation from the Alaska AFL-CIO, the Democrats’ surrogate campaign operation.  

In the House, Rep. Andy Josephson, is an attorney, teacher and was the most vocal defender of former Permanent Fund President and CEO, Angela Rodell in the most recent meeting of the Legislative Budget and Audit Committee.  

Although twin reports were published that Rodell lost the confidence of the Board of Trustees and was terminated, Rep. Josephson defended her advocacy of the Percent of Market Value and policy of the House to reduce dividends rather than reconnect them to earnings.

In the last campaigns (2020) nine incumbents were removed by the voters. We’re not done yet. Those incumbents did not agree with the Constitution’s Section 2, that “All government originates with the people, is founded upon their will only, and is instituted solely for the good of the people as a whole.”  

Some incumbents have danced on the question of dividends saying they are preserving the Alaska Permanent Fund. Don’t be tricked as I was to support folks that tell us their story of conversion, while voting for the special interests. Can you decide how to spend your dividend or will Legislators?  

Let’s not forget that the Alaska Permanent Fund only receives 25% of the revenue. The Legislature already gets 75% but that’s not enough.  The only thing stopping the greedy blood suckers are the people who call their legislators and demand an answer to the simple question, “Have you voted for the full dividend or not?” If you have an open seat, call each legislator and ask them “Will you vote for a full dividend or not?”  

Once you’ve discovered the good guys from the bad guys, help the good guys in their campaigns and punish the bad guys by voting against them. The will of the people is scoffed at by the tricksters who tell you one thing then do another. They can’t get away with it if you pay attention.    

 Jim Crawford is the former President of Permanent Fund Defenders, pfdak.com, an Alaska-based educational nonprofit corporation.  Jim is a third generation, lifelong Alaskan who co-chaired the Alaskans Just Say No campaign to stop the raid on the Permanent Fund in 1999.  He also served Gov. Jay Hammond as a member of the Investment Advisory Committee, which formed the investment and corporate strategy of the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation in 1975.   

14 COMMENTS

  1. Since you bring up Cathy Giessel, what does Roger Holland, her opponent, say about annual PFD disbursements moving forward?

  2. Stealing PFD’s from poor Alaskans is roughly equivalent to being a horse thief. It’s stealing transportation, housing, and food from the table. There used to be trials and punishment for people who did such things. I move we bring back the good old days.

  3. I’m hard pressed to see any “good guys” here.

    My hope is instead of a Constitutional Convention which enshrines the statutory payout, we go with the Mackie Plan and end this farce once and for all.

  4. I guess it’s too much to ask for Alaska to get a fair price for the oil in the first place. We are left fighting over the scraps because the oil companies are allowed to have their employees in the legislature give them just about everything.

  5. When we do not pay attention — we are losing large chunks of our culture and wellbeing and $$$
    Please PAY ATTENTION RATHER THAN SPEAKING. LISTEN, PAY ATTENTION

  6. Great article, Jim. Moving money around into various state accounts before it’s calculated into the Permanent Fund earnings account is nothing more than theft against Alaskans. Bill Walker and his side kick Cathy Giessel will do it again if elected. Both Walker and Giessel need to have their a$$es kicked hard in November so they will never run for office again. Both are losers and enemies of Alaska.

    • Knowing Cathy Giessel all too well, I concur. Walker is trying to round up the losers from the past (2014-2018) and bring them back for another haunting in Juneau. A better bet is for them to have a little seance’ somewhere private, where they can summons Byron Mallott, Gary Sapp and other losers who went down thinking they were on top. Losers need to stick together, where they can enjoy each other’s company.

  7. “Then they swiped the $1.4 billion from the Constitutional Budget Reserve.” Where is that money?
    Lazy Mt. Jim who called into radio stations said by 2011, there was more than $27 Billion missing.

Comments are closed.