Saturday, June 13, 2026
Home Blog Page 783

President vows to keep his Covid emergency powers

President Joe Biden says he will veto Senate Joint Resolution 63, which if passed by the U.S. House, would terminate the president’s emergency powers enacted on March 13, 2020. Biden has had emergency powers during his entire presidency.

SJR 63, sponsored by Kansas Republican Sen. Roger “Doc” Marshall, was passed in the Senate on Tuesday with 13 Democrat senators joining the Republicans. It now goes to the House. SJR 63 would end the Covid-19 national state of emergency currently in effect under the National Emergencies Act.

Marshall’s resolution, filed in September, followed President Biden’s comments on Sept. 19 that the coronavirus pandemic is over.

Immediately after the resolution passed the Senate on Tuesday, the White House threatened to veto the measure.

“Continuing to protect against COVID-19 and ensuring that our response remains nimble are top priorities of this Administration. Therefore, the Administration strongly opposes Senate Joint Resolution 63, which would terminate the national emergency declared on March 13, 2020, and unnecessarily and abruptly curtail the ability of the Administration to respond to COVID-19,” the White House wrote.

“COVID-19 has posed an unprecedented public health challenge for the United States. While COVID-19 is no longer the disruptive threat that it once was and we have made tremendous progress in combating the virus, the virus continues to pose a risk to the American people and our health care system.

“The national emergency enables the Administration to more effectively respond to COVID-19, including ensuring that necessary supplies are promptly available to respond to the virus and facilitating the delivery of health care at a time when our health system has been under tremendous and prolonged stress. These authorities are critical to continue responding not only to the Omicron variant, but also to emerging subvariants already spreading in the United States and future variants that may arise. Additionally, easing further strain on our health care workforce and health care system and the ability to deliver care to COVID-19 patients will also enable treatment of people suffering from other illnesses who are also put at risk when hospital systems are overwhelmed. Preserving our ability to respond is more important than ever as we head into the winter, when respiratory illnesses such as COVID-19 typically spread more easily. Strengthened by the ongoing declaration of national emergency, the federal response to COVID- 19 continues to save lives, improve health outcomes, and support the American economy.”

The president’s team wrote: “Action by Congress to end these authorities abruptly and prematurely would be a reckless and costly mistake. If Congress passes this resolution, the President will veto it.”

The House is now controlled by Republicans, who may seek to end the president’s emergency authorities and force the veto.

The president will likely keep his emergency powers until the 2024 election cycle. A national emergency declaration stays in effect unless terminated by the president, or through a joint resolution of Congress. Declaring an emergency allows the White House to use the National Emergencies Act, which comes with vast powers.

San Francisco has new guaranteed income program for transgender people in poverty

Transgenders in the Bay Area have until Dec. 15 to file for the new San Francisco guaranteed income program made especially for them. San Francisco city officials announced the program, called the Guaranteed Income for Trans People, or GIFT, this week. It will give 55 low-income transgender residents $1,200 per month for up to 18 months, and is a pilot program that may be the second in the nation, after Palm Springs launched a similar one last year.

The program was launched because, per to the Mayor’s Office, trans people experience poverty and homelessness at higher rates than other people.

The GIFT program will provide “temporary income and a range of wrap-around direct services, such as gender affirming medical and mental health care, as well as financial coaching. Our Guaranteed Income Programs allow us to help our residents when they need it most as part of our City’s economic recovery and our commitment to creating a more just city for all,” Mayor London Breed said in a statement. “We know that our trans communities experience much higher rates of poverty and discrimination, so this program will target support to lift individuals in this community up. We will keep building on programs like this to provide those in the greatest need with the financial resources and services to help them thrive.”

Pau Crego, executive director of the San Francisco Office of Transgender Initiatives, said, “Even with our rich history of trans advocacy, we see that trans San Franciscans experience poverty at exponentially higher rates compared to the general population.”

The program will cost residents of San Francisco $1 million a year for two years and comes through the city’s Office of Housing and Community Development budget. San Francisco has 873,965 residents in the city limits. According to a federal study, there are about 807 “trans men” in the San Francisco city limits.

San Francisco already has a legally recognized Transgender District, with special rules, incentives, and set asides for transgenders.

This program is the third demographic-specific program of its sort in the San Francisco budget. In 2020, the city starting giving $1,000 monthly payments to “qualifying pregnant people” who are Black or Pacific Islander. The payments continue until two years after the child is born. In 2021, a $1,000 payment was approved for San Francisco artists impacted by the Covid pandemic.

Conservatives celebrate: Republicans take control of U.S. House

By TOM GANTERT | THE CENTER SQUARE

California saved the day for Republicans, who took a majority of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives after media outlets projected California Republican Mike Garcia would win the 27th Congressional District.

CNN, Fox News, the New York Times and the Washington Post all reported the GOP took the House majority as of Wednesday night. With a handful of races still left to call, Republicans are projected to hold at least 218 seats, enough to secure majority control. Democrats had 210 seats as of Wednesday.

Alaska will be left out in the cold, with Congresswoman Mary Peltola, a freshman, in the minority. She is on track to win the two-year seat for Alaska’s only congressional position after more than 116,000 voters chose her in the Nov. 8 election, which is a ranked-choice system that won’t be decided until Nov. 23.

The New York Times tweeted, “Republicans seized a slender majority in the House of Representatives on Wednesday. It will reorder the balance of power in Washington and is expected to effectively give the party a veto on President [Joe] Biden’s agenda for the next two years.”

Conservatives celebrated.

“SO LONG, NANCY!” Fox News commentator Sean Hannity posted on Twitter.

Democrat Nancy Pelosi is the outgoing Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives. The Speaker of the House has broad authority including the power to select who is appointed to which committees.

U.S. Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., the current minority leader, is expected to lead the House but is facing some pushback from within his own party.

“Republicans just won back control of the House. This is a big deal,” Joe Walsh, a former GOP U.S. Congressman who ran for president in 2020, posted on Twitter. “The majority party in the House controls & dictates EVERYTHING. So the GOP will investigate EVERYTHING. They’ll disband the Jan 6th Committee on day 1 & launch an investigation of the Jan 6th Committee on day 2.”

Some supporters of Democrats said the GOP won control by gerrymandering.

Jon Cooper, a New York Democratic activist who was the Long Island chairman for Barack Obama’s presidential campaign, tweeted Nov. 15: “If Republicans do end up winning the House by a RAZOR-THIN margin, that will ONLY have been due to extreme, partisan gerrymandering by the GOP – in TX, FL, OH and elsewhere. The GOP couldn’t win a fair fight.” 

Democrats in Blue states such as Illinois also have been accused of gerrymandering their way to big election wins.

Tom Gantert worked at many daily newspapers including the Ann Arbor News, Lansing State Journal and USA Today. Gantert was the managing editor of Michigan Capitol Confidential for five years before joining The Center Square.

Tim Barto: In the matter of Peter Edward Rose

By TIM BARTO

This past weekend, Pete Rose wrote a letter to the Commissioner of Baseball, asking for a dispensation that would end his suspension and allow him to be considered for election to the Hall of Fame. The letter was apologetic and contrite, characteristics for which Charlie Hustle is not known.

Pete Rose loves baseball, and he played the game the right way, with enthusiasm and gusto. He sprinted to first base after drawing a walk. He slid headfirst. He rattled off statistics like an accountant. He punched Bud Harrelson in the face. He loved baseball more than anything in the world, and he may very likely have been the first unanimous election to the Hall of Fame . . . if he hadn’t gambled on games in which his team was playing.

Posted on the wall in every Major League clubhouse is a sign that reads, in part, “Any player, umpire, or Club or League official or employee, who shall bet any sum whatsoever upon any baseball game in connection with which the bettor has a duty to perform, shall be declared permanently ineligible.:

It is Rule 21, section D, subsection two, known simply as Rule 21. It was written after “Shoeless” Joe Jackson and seven of his Chicago White Sox teammates colluded with gamblers to throw the 1919 World Series, and it is the reason Shoeless Joe is not in the Hall of Fame despite a lifetime batting average of .356, third highest in the history of the game. And it is the reason why Pete Rose, who amassed 4,256 hits – the highest total of any player ever – has been banned from baseball, and the Hall of Fame, since August of 1989, when he struck a deal with then Commissioner Bart Giamatti.

Before proceeding, allow me, please, to let you know why this whole matter matters to me.

I became a Cincinnati Reds fan in 1970 when I was seven years old. It was a great year to become a Reds fan. They hired a new manager in 35-year-old rookie skipper Sparky Anderson, who led the team to 102 wins, a division title, a National League pennant, and a trip to the World Series. Reds’ catcher Johnny Bench won his first Most Valuable Player while leading the league in home runs and RBIs. A new stadium opened in Cincinnati, just in time to host the All-Star Game in July, when hometown hero Pete Rose bowled over Ray Fosse to win the game in extra innings. 

As a kid, my favorite player was Reds’ catcher Johnny Bench, but Pete Rose was a close second. Pete hit from both sides of the plate, crouching low and intensely following into the catcher’s mitt any balls he didn’t swing at. His uniform was usually covered in dirt, and he seemed to be enjoying himself every second of every game. 

Like thousands of boys who grew up in the 1970s, I imitated Pete by sliding headfirst, despite Mom’s objections that I’d break a finger or crack my head open. I also crouched in my batting stance like Pete. It didn’t help me hit any better; in fact, it probably made things worse, but I still did it.

In that glorious year of 1970, I attended my very first Reds game in person when they came to town to play the San Francisco Giants. My Dad, my older brother Rick, and I arrived at Candlestick Park two hours early to watch batting practice, and as Rick and I were walking around the nearly empty stadium, we spotted a Reds player near the stands, just behind home plate. I had a brand new baseball and a pen with me in the hopes that I could get a Reds’ player’s autograph, so I ran down the steps to hopefully get my first signature. Upon approach, I realized that Reds player was none other than team captain Pete Rose. He saw me barreling full speed at him with a crazed look in my eyes, and probably thought I was going to sprint myself right over the rail and on top of him. I was able to slam on the brakes and skid to a stop, then stuck out my baseball and pen. Pete grabbed it, signed it, and for a split second there I thought he might have actually made eye contact with me.

I was so starstruck I lost my ability to speak, unable to even get the words “Thank you” out of my mouth. 

(Side note: a week or so later, my best friend, Gertch, and I wanted to play catch, but we couldn’t find a ball, so I retrieved that Pete Rose-signed pearl and, figuring it wouldn’t get too smudged just from playing catch, tossed it around with Gertch. It didn’t get smudged, but it did get dirty and worn, so I traced over Pete’s signature with a pen to make it look good again. It didn’t look good, but I still have it 52 years later.)

In late 1978, after a season that saw him hit in forty-four straight games to tie for second place all time in that category, Pete Rose, incomprehensibly left the Reds and signed an $800,000-a-year contract with the Philadelphia Phillies, making him the highest paid player in the game. (The minimum salary in the big leagues for the 2022 season was $700,000. Think about that for a minute or two.) 

Pete’s defection not only betrayed my inner sense of loyalty but, to add insult to injury, the Phillies were favorite team of my other best friend, Andy. This whole situation was intolerable to me, and Andy knew it. Without saying a word, and without any warning, he would crouch down into a Pete-Rose-like batting stance just to irk me. And irk me it did. I’d had enough.

“The name Pete Rose,” I declared to my family, “shall henceforth be disallowed in the Barto household. He will be referred to as Benedict Arnold.”

That’s how serious I took this stuff.

Fast forward to 1984, and Pete Rose returned to Cincinnati to be the Reds’ player-manager. I tried not to care. One night, I was having dinner at my parents’ house when my Dad, reading the newspaper (a compilation of large pieces paper with news stories, advertisements, and baseball scores printed on them in ink), said, “Tim, the Reds are playing the Giants tonight at Candlestick. Pete’s back. Let’s go see ‘em.”

“His name is still Benedict Arnold, and I don’t want to see that traitor,” I replied.

“Come on. He’s a Red again. Let’s go. My treat.”

It’s hard to say no to a ballgame with my Dad, so off we went.

In those days, the Reds were awful, but the Giants were slightly awfuller, and, in true Bay Area spirit, the fair-weather fans stayed away in droves. We walked up to the ticket booth about a half hour before the game began and were able to get tickets (I kid you not) in section one, box one, the very first row between home plate and the first base dugout. To this day, the best seats I have ever had at a professional baseball game.

The public address announcer introduced Pete Rose, playing first base and wearing number 14, and I sat on my hands. “Oh, come on, clap for Charlie Hustle,” my Dad egged on.

“Nope. He betrayed his hometown and his fans,” I said as I refused to cheer such treachery. I didn’t boo; I just didn’t clap.

Until a few innings later. 

Pete came to bat, hitting from the left side, he slapped a pitch to the opposite field and bolted towards first base. And that’s when the clouds lifted, the heavens opened, and the angels sang in unison. Pete took a wide turn at first and it became apparent he was going for two bases. Muscle memory kicked in and I subconsciously stood because I had seen this dozens of times before and it was a thing of beauty. Pete Rose was churning like a freight train towards second base and diving headfirst into the bag for a double. It was classic Pete Rose – and I was jumping onto the screen, chills running up and down my body, screaming, “You’re the greatest! Welcome back, Pete! Welcome back!” It was delicious, and I was delirious.

Dad smiled, and in less than ten seconds I had forgiven Pete Rose. He was back home with the Reds, where he belonged. He would bring the club back to the glory days of the Big Red Machine, and one day he would be enshrined in the Hall of Fame.

Five years later, when the stories of Pete’s gambling were coming to light, many of us were in disbelief. When Pete agreed to his suspension, we were absolutely bewildered.

I agreed that Pete Rose should not be permitted into the Hall. He broke the fundamental rule of professional baseball by laying money on games in which his team was playing. He was a manager when he did it, and he bet on his team to win but, still, he broke Rule 21, and he would have to suffer a lifetime suspension. Those who know how much I loved the Cincinnati Reds and the way Pete Rose played the game, have been startled at the hard line I took on the matter. 

At first, Pete was adamant that he did not bet on baseball. Former teammates shunned him. Advertisers avoided him. Friends told him to come clean. Lawyers gave him bad advice.  

Eventually, Rose admitted he bet on games . . . but not on Reds’ games. Then, in 2003, after 15 years of denial and partial admissions, Pete Rose admitted his guilt: he did, in fact, bet on Reds’ games in which he was managing the team. He finally came clean, and he tried his best to embrace this newfound honest. His most often-requested autograph since then is one in which he writes, “I’m sorry I bet on baseball” next to his signature. He even signed copies of the Dowd Report, the investigative results that led to his banishment by Commissioner Giamatti. 

But baseball has taken some unusual turns of late: 

  • The Houston Astros were found to be brazenly and collectively cheating during their 2017 world championship season, and none of their players received any punishment. 
  • The Hall of Fame voted in the first admitted steroid user (David Ortiz), and the more notorious steroid users – some of whom have admitted their use and some who have yet to do so – are receiving increasing vote totals from the Hall of Fame voters each year.
  • Most unusual of all, Major League Baseball now allows gambling businesses to advertise at the ballparks with billboards and even their logos on pitcher’s mound. 
  • The MLB Network posts the odds for each game.
  • And, in the most remarkable – and for Pete Rose, the cruelest – turn of all, next season the Cincinnati Reds will allow a betting operation, run by BetMGM, to take bets inside their own ballpark. 

If admitted cheaters are allowed to continue playing the game without punishment, steroid users can be enshrined into the Hall of Fame, and Major League Baseball openly allows gambling advertisement and actual betting at their ballparks, then it is only fair that the matter of Peter Edward Rose be revisited, and the all-time hit king be reinstated.

Pete is now 81 years old, and the math is against him. He is, perhaps, coming to terms with his mortality. To me, though, his recent letter to the Commissioner is reminiscent of that base hit down the left field line that resulted in me jumping on the backstop fence. Pete Rose is running hard, rounding first base . . . 

Tim Barto is Vice President at Alaska Policy Forum, the immediate past President of the Chugiak-Eagle River Chinooks Booster Club, and is feeling an unexpected sense of peace advocating for Pete Rose to be inducted into the Baseball Hall of Fame.

Read: Knik’s field of broken dreams

Tim Barto: Knik’s field of broken dreams

Murkowski, Sullivan vote to advance bill that equates same-sex marriage with interracial marriage, with same protections

Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and 11 other Senate Republicans have committed to voting for a same-sex marriage bill in the Senate, guaranteeing its passage this week or next. Sen. Dan Sullivan was among those voting in favor of the bill. Both Murkowski and Sullivan are Catholics; the Catholic Church explicitly denies its blessing for marriages between two people of the same sex.

Sens. Mitt Romney of Utah and Roy Blunt of Missouri also said they would vote for the bill that moved forward 62-37, with 12 Republicans joining all the Democrats in the Senate. The bill only needed 10 Republicans to move.

The Respect for Marriage Act, with lead sponsors Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wisc., and Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, went through negotiations that purport to protect religious liberties, and a final vote is expected on the Senate floor on the amended version.

“We can ease the fear that millions of same-sex and interracial couples have that their freedoms and their rights could be stripped away,” Baldwin said, equating same-sex marriage with interracial marriage. “We are guaranteeing same-sex and and interracial couples, regardless of where they live, that their marriage is legal.”

The bill was introduced and passed the House in lightning speed in July on a vote of 267 to 157, with 47 Republicans and all Democrats supporting it. There was no vote from Alaska, as the state’s congressman, Don Young, had died and the state was without representation. Based on past history, Young would have likely voted against then bill; Congresswoman Mary Peltola, who has since taken the spot, would likely have voted for it. There were no public hearings on the bill.

The passage of the Respect for Marriage Act concerns those for whom adoption and fostering of children is a stumbling block. It also affords weak-to-no protections for faith-based non-profits, religious schools, religious business owners, and civil servants.

“The so-called Respect for Marriage Act is a misnamed bill designed to enshrine same-sex marriage in federal law,” wrote Greg Baylor, chief legal counsel at Alliance Defending Freedom.

“As soon as the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in June, activists went to work mischaracterizing the ruling. Many used the decision—and particularly Justice Clarence Thomas’s concurrence—to claim that the Court could revisit other rulings, including the one in Obergefell v. Hodges, which created a constitutional ‘right’ to same-sex marriage. Using this feigned outrage as a cover, these activists pushed for a federal law called the Respect for Marriage Act,” wrote the attorney.

“Let’s be clear: the Respect for Marriage Act is unnecessary and could have a disastrous effect on religious freedom,” Baylor said.

Read more about Alliance Defending Freedom’s position here.

Sen. Dan Sullivan’s office issued a statement:

“This vote was unnecessary. The Supreme Court has already ruled on this issue—under Obergefell v. Hodges same-sex marriage is already the law of the land in each state—and our time and energies should be focused on addressing the very real and immediate concerns of the vast majority of Americans, including runaway inflation and looming energy shortages,” he said.

“However, given that the Majority Leader insisted on bringing this vote to the floor, I listened to Alaskans and used the opportunity to work relentlessly to include in the bill considerable advances in much stronger religious liberty protections for millions of Americans that previously were not in federal law and were not in the Obergefell decision,” Sullivan said.

The protections include:

•          Directing courts that nothing in the bill diminishes current statutory religious liberties or conscience protections, including the important protections in the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.

•          Protecting the rights of a broad array of religious organizations, including educational institutions, and their employees from being required to host, accommodate, or in any way participate in same-sex wedding ceremonies; 

•     Protecting these same religious organizations from being sued for not participating in same-sex wedding ceremonies; and

•     Preventing the federal government from discriminating or retaliating against religious organizations that hold a traditional view of marriage by taking away any benefit, right, or status—including tax-exempt status, grants, loans, or educational accreditation, among others.

“While I’ve long held that marriage should be an issue left up to the states, the Supreme Court nationalized the issue in Obergefell. I said then that I would respect the Court’s decision, but would also continue to fight for and respect and defend the religious liberty of all Americans. This bill makes important advances in doing that. Finally, in the very unlikely event that Obergefell is overturned in the future, this bill would still respect state laws, like Alaska’s constitutional provision on traditional marriage, and it would only require states to provide full faith and credit recognition to all lawful marriages from other states,” Sullivan said.

The bill does not protect people like Colorado cake baker Jack Phillips, who has been sued repeatedly for conscientiously refusing to decorate a cake for a same-sex wedding celebration.

The Respect for Marriage Act is also opposed by the Religious Freedom Institute, which issued a statement that the bill would, “deal a devastating blow to religious freedom in America, even if it included proposed amendments [which the current bill now does] that purport to protect religious freedom, but in fact do not. It represents a dangerous authoritarian turn by Congress and the administration that would extend the power of government well beyond its constitutional role and harm the fundamental freedoms of all Americans.”

The Institute said that the bill attempts to dismantle and remake an institution that existed long before the state, that is, marriage and the family produced by marriage. Even in its amended form, it does not protect religious liberty of dissenters.”

The premise of the Respect for Marriage Act, is that any “opposition to same-sex ‘marriage’ is akin to racism. That claim is not only false but profoundly disingenuous. The vast majority of Americans, including those who are religious, do not oppose interracial marriage. There is no real or perceived threat to marriage based on race in any state in America.”

The Respect for Marriage Act would repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, signed into law by President Bill Clinton in 1996. DOMA, as that law is known, affirmed, for federal purposes, that marriage is the union of one man and one woman, and allowed states to refuse to recognize “same-sex marriages” granted under the laws of other states, the institute said. The Supreme Court overturned it in 2013 in United States v. Windsor. Later, in Obergefell v. Hodges, the Supreme Court required all states to license and recognize same-sex marriage.

Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas) sent a letter to his Republican senators on Wednesday, urging a no vote. He wrote:

Dear Senate Republican Colleagues,

Under the guise of compromise, and the cultural winds of today, you are slated to soon vote on the so-called “Respect for Marriage Act.” Supporting this bill would be a mistake, as passing this bill would codify, in federal law, a false belief on marriage and villainize millions of Americans for their religious beliefs. This, all because Democrats felt political pressure mounting, and Justice Clarence Thomas lives rent free in their heads.

The Baldwin-Collins-Tillis Amendment will threaten the charity status of faith-based adoption and foster-care agencies — while painting a target on them for future frivolous litigation — and fan the flames of attacks on religious liberty. As drafted, this amendment does not provide sufficient protections for faith-based non-profits, religious schools, religious business owners, and civil servants or close the polygamy loophole.

In July, the House Freedom Caucus took an official position urging you, our Senate colleagues, to oppose this unnecessary and harmful legislation.1 Not only should this bill be opposed on its merits, but Speaker Pelosi rushed this legislation through the House without hearings, markups, and the proper time to review before Members were asked to vote on the floor. Indeed, this bill passed the Democrat led House of Representatives with 157 “Nay” votes and should not become law.

The law cannot be neutral on marriage. It can either affirm truth or portray distortions. The foundational truth will always remain, and no act of Congress can change that. Those who see and know the truth have a moral duty to stand firm in its defense and to defend the crucial institution of marriage.

Doing so against the grain of cultural and political forces to cower and compromise takes courage; the question is how many Republicans will display it this week.

Many Republicans believe it is unnecessary to vote on something already decided in favor of same-sex marriage by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Culture wars continue as Colorado cake artist being sued in court for not celebrating gender transition with a special cake

Verdict: McConnell repeats as Senate GOP minority leader

Having spent money foolishly to fight a Republican battle in Alaska and after losing Senate seats in Arizona and elsewhere in the country, Sen. Mitch McConnell has nonetheless won the needed votes from his Republican members to continue as Senate Minority Leader. You read that right: He could have been Majority Leader, but his use of the Senate Leadership Fund political action committee funds may have sealed the fate for Republicans to stay in the Senate minority.

 Senate Republicans voted Wednesday in a secret ballot to keep McConnell of Kentucky as their leader. This continues his role as the lawmaker who is at the highest office of any Republican in the country and allows him to continue directing the Senate Leadership Fund, which spent millions of dollars to defeat Alaska Republican Kelly Tshibaka in an effort to prop up the campaign of Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who had been censured by the Alaska Republican Party.

Republican grassroots leaders in Alaska were furious with McConnell this fall for meddling in their election, after McConnell directed $7 million of donated funds to vicious ads against Tshibaka, who is the Alaska Republican Party’s endorsed nominee. It’s unclear how Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Sen. Dan Sullivan voted on McConnell continuing as Senate Majority Leader, but almost certain that Murkowski returned the favor.

But there were dissenters:

“We have a contested leadership election in the Senate GOP,” Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., wrote on Twitter. “My view is we should let @HerschelWalker vote! Don’t disenfranchise him. Tomorrow at the election meeting I will ask for a vote on a delay to allow Herschel, if elected, to participate.”

Herschel Walker, a Republican, faces a runoff with Sen. Raphael Warnock of Georgia on Dec. 6.

Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas criticized McConnell on Cruz’ “Verdict” podcast on Monday.

“Mitch would rather be leader than have a Republican majority,” Cruz said. “If there’s a Republican who can win who’s not going to support Mitch, the truth of the matter is he’d rather the Democrat win.”

The vote proceeded despite an attempt to delay it, launched by Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla, and despite a letter from Scott, who launched a bid to take the spot. Scott wrote to his fellow Republicans on Wednesday, “I’m writing to you today because I believe it’s time for the Senate Republican Conference to be far more bold and resolute than we have been in the past. We must start saying what we are for, not just what we are against. I do not believe we can simply continue to say the Democrats are radical, which they are. Republican voters expect and deserve to know our plan to promote and advance conservative values. We need to listen to their calls for action and start governing in Washington like we campaign back at home. There is a Republican Party that is alive and well in communities across America. It is time there is one in Washington, D.C., too. That is why I am running to be Republican Leader.”

Open letter to Mitch McConnell: Stay out of Alaska election

“For those who want to get serious about ending reckless government spending and the devastating inflation it has caused, finally take action to protect Social Security and Medicare and preserve the promise of these programs for our children and grandchildren, hold government accountable from the FBI to the IRS, truly combat the extreme danger posed by Communist China and refocus our military on lethal defense instead of woke nonsense, I ask for your support in changing the direction of the Senate and rescuing America from the dangerous path Democrats have set it on,” Scott wrote.

Downing: McConnell’s proxy war with Trump in Alaska is stuck on stupid

Breaking: Alaska Republican Party votes overwhelmingly to censure Sen. Mitch McConnell for attacking Republican Kelly Tshibaka

Breaking: Alaska Republican Party votes overwhelmingly to censure Sen. Mitch McConnell for attacking Republican Kelly Tshibaka

Tidal wave from Alaska Republicans: Three more committees resolve censures against Mitch McConnell attacks on candidate Kelly Tshibaka

Tidal wave from Alaska Republicans: Three more committees resolve censures against Mitch McConnell attacks on candidate Kelly Tshibaka

Stampede: Growing referendum on Sen. Mitch McConnell by Alaska Republican committees furious over attack ads against Republican candidate Kelly Tshibaka

Alaska named by Lonely Planet among top 30 destinations for 2023

Alaska made the list. The annual “Best in Travel Destinations” includes Alaska in the top 30 places to go in 2023. Alaska was in one of the five categories listed by the publication, which called Alaska an “epic” travel experience.

“Bears larger than bison, national parks the size of nations, and glaciers bigger than other US states. The word ‘epic’ barely does Alaska justice.”

In 2022, Alaska saw about one million visitors by cruise ship, but had the capacity for more. The ships were about three-quarters full, having started from zero due to two years of Covid cancellations. The last cruise ship of the season, Norwegian Encore, returned to Seattle on Oct. 23. The next cruise ship is April 22, 2023.

Getting back to pre-pandemic levels, the cruise industry has the capacity to go beyond the 2019 level and get to 1.6 million visitors, industry sources told Must Read Alaska. Demand is high, sources said, and the market is strong. While earlier there was a high degree of uncertainty with Canada’s border being closed and with unknown variants of the Covid virus, but those uncertainties don’t seem to exist for 2023.

It’s the 18th year for the Lonely Planet’s Top 30 list, which starts with nominations from the company’s extensive community of staff, writers, bloggers, publishing partners, and others. The nominations are whittled down by its panel of travel experts to just 30 destinations.  Each is chosen for its topicality, unique experiences, ‘wow’ factor and its ongoing commitment to sustainability, community and diversity.

“Pure, raw, unforgiving and humongous in scale, Alaska is a place that arouses basic instincts and ignites what Jack London termed the ‘call of the wild.’ Yet, unlike London and his gutsy, gold-rush companions, visitors today will have a far easier time penetrating the region’s vast, feral wilderness. Indeed, one of the beauties of the 49th state is its accessibility. Few other places in the US allow you to scale an unclimbed mountain, walk where – quite possibly – no human foot has trodden before, or sally forth into a national park that gets fewer annual visitors than the International Space Station,” Lonely Planet said.

“For savvy repeat visitors, the real joys of Alaska are the ones you least expect: ginormous vegetables, epic bus rides, half-forgotten Russian cemeteries, friendly, hassle-free airports, and dive bars where no one’s rethought their hairstyle since 1984. Welcome to a state with as many offbeat attractions as off-the-beaten-track locations. Imagine a land where locals still go subsistence hunting, campers plan gold-panning expeditions in the wilderness and wi-fi is just a rumor. Pitch in with a quirky medley of contrarians, rat-race escapees, wanderers, dreamers, back-to-the-landers and Alaska Natives and discover what makes America’s biggest state tick,” the publication wrote.

Photo credit: OceanRaftAlaska.com

Alaska Permanent Fund exposure to FTX crypto meltdown was minor, but not so much for Tom Brady, Shaquille O’Neal, and other stars

23

FTX, a cryptocurrency exchange scam that was run by Sam Bankman-Fried, sucked in thousands of investors into its sub-funds. The Alaska Permanent Fund was one of them, investing in Sequoia Capital’s Global Growth Fund III, which invested a sliver of funds into FTX. The APFC investment of $200 million, however, doesn’t represent the actual exposure to FTX, which has a value now of $0.

According to sources at the Alaska Permanent Fund, the fund has an indirect exposure of just about $4 million to FTX through APFC’s private equity program. The FTX exposure represents 0.03% of the fund’s $15 billion private equity portfolio, which is a portion of the fund’s $75 billion portfolio. APFC is not a direct investor in the cryptocurrency markets, but there may be minimal indirect exposure to the FTX meltdown through other private equity external managers that the fund invests with.

In related news, a new lawsuit has been filed in Florida against FTX’s former CEO Bankman-Fried. The lawsuit names numerous celebrities who lent their names to the enterprise that now appears to have been criminal in nature. The lawsuit names comedian Larry David, Japanese tennis star Naomi Osaka, the married couple Gisele Bundchen and NFL quarterback Tom Brady, NFL star Trevor Lawrence, basketball players Shaquille O’Neal, Steph Curry, Udonis Haslem, and the Golden State Warriors, baseball players Shohei Ohtani, and David Ortiz, and celebrity investor Kevin O’Leary. The celebrities are included due to their promotion of FTX across the media.

Promotion from the FTX website.

“The Deceptive FTX Platform maintained by the FTX Entities was truly a house of cards, a Ponzi scheme where the FTX Entities shuffled customer funds between their opaque affiliated entities, using new investor funds obtained through investments in the YBAs and loans to pay interest to the old ones and to attempt to maintain the appearance of liquidity,” the lawsuit reads.

“Part of the scheme employed by the FTX Entities involved utilising some of the biggest names in sports and entertainment – like these Defendants – to raise funds and drive American consumers to invest in the [yield-bearing accounts], which were offered and sold largely from the FTX Entities’ domestic base of operations here in Miami, Florida, pouring billions of dollars into the Deceptive FTX Platform to keep the whole scheme afloat.”

It’s now believed that the cryptocurrency exchange created various pass-through funds to Democratic candidates and causes, and was also allegedly helping Ukraine finance its defense against Russia’s invasion.

Among the crypto tokens sold by the exchange was one called TRUMPLOSE, another indication of what kind of political operation FTX was engaged in at the expense of investors.

“Published by the Financial Times, the balance sheet triggered disbelief and amazement in financial circles, especially after Bloomberg’s Matt Levine highlighted its many bizarre attributes. These include assets in the form of illiquid shitcoins that FTX had conjured out of thin air, including $2.2 billion of “Serum” tokens and over $600 million of “Maps” tokens, as well as $7.3 million of a mysterious illiquid asset called TRUMPLOSE. And then there is a line for $8 billion of liabilities that is described on the spreadsheet as “Hidden, poorly internally labeled ‘fiat@’ account.” Huh? I can’t begin to describe how outlandish this is in terms of standard accounting, so I will leave it to the inimitable Levine,” writes Jeff John Roberts in Fortune Crypto.

“If you try to calculate the equity of a balance sheet with an entry for HIDDEN POORLY INTERNALLY LABELED ACCOUNT, Microsoft Clippy will appear before you in the flesh, bloodshot and staggering, with a knife in his little paper-clip hand, saying, ‘Just what do you think you’re doing, Dave?’ You cannot apply ordinary arithmetic to numbers in a cell labeled ‘HIDDEN POORLY INTERNALLY LABELED ACCOUNT.’ The result of adding or subtracting those numbers with ordinary numbers is not a number; it is prison,” Levine said.

Roberts wrote that it’s not an exaggeration to say prison may be ahead for Bankman-Fried, “as I explained earlier, these sorts of accounting shenanigans combined with knowing deception translates into federal wire fraud, which can carry a term of 20 years.”

In addition to the criminal side, “there’s the question of how the company produced such a dog’s breakfast of a balance sheet in the first place. One reason is that U.S. regulators have long refused to produce any helpful guidance for crypto accounting, which has meant professional bean counters have failed to come up with a system for integrating crypto assets into financial statements,” Roberts wrote.

Restraining order requested against co-founder of Lincoln Project, who brought Sarah Palin to national scene in 2008 and attacked Sen. Dan Sullivan in 2020

The former wife of Lincoln Project co-founder Steve Schmidt has filed for a temporary restraining order against the famous political operative who has ties to Alaska elections, court records obtained by the Daily Caller show.

Schmidt denies the report and has demanded a retraction from the news group, which reports from the conservative side.

Schmidt is furious and has several times threatened on Twitter to sue the news group over the story. The Daily Caller, in response, stands by its story in this editorial.

“In our view, ‘litigation by Twitter’ is little more than public relations. Mr. Schmidt complained that we referred to The Lincoln Project as “his” organization. While he might like everyone to forget that he was in fact a cofounder, we again as a courtesy, corrected the story to clarify that he left the organization after it was embroiled in a scandal involving homosexual harassment,” the editorial says.

Angela Schmidt, Steve Schmidt’s ex-wife requested the temporary restraining order in mid-October in a Utah state court, according to a legal history of the Schmidts’ divorce. A hearing on her filing was held on Nov. 4, according to the records obtained by the Daily Caller. The partial divorce history is at this link.

In the years before and since the restraining order was requested, Schmidt has been a regular on social media accusing Republican candidates of inappropriate gestures or behaviors. He’s now facing accusations of being a perpetrator. Schmidt is a “never-Trumper” and a “never-Sarah Palin,” although during the 2008 presidential race, he took credit for bringing Palin to the ticket with presidential hopeful Sen. John McCain.

In 2020, one of the Lincoln Project top goals was flipping the Alaska Senate seat blue and propping up candidate Al Gross, a Democrat disguised as an unaligned candidate, to beat Sen. Dan Sullivan. The main attack on Sullivan was that he wasn’t Alaskan enough, unlike the “Bear Doctor” who has once killed a bear.

The Lincoln Project spent well over $1 million that year on ads romanticizing Gross, who ran with the Alaska Democratic Party’s endorsement.

In 2022, the Lincoln Project attacked Sarah Palin in her bid for Congress. But by then, Schmidt was out of the by-then scandal-ridden Lincoln Project and was attacking Palin on his own time.

In 2018, 10 years after running McCain’s campaign into the ground, Schmidt left the Republican Party, which he called corrupt and immoral: “29 years and nine months ago I registered to vote and became a member of The Republican Party which was founded in 1854 to oppose slavery and stand for the dignity of human life. Today I renounce my membership in the Republican Party. It is fully the party of Trump.” He became a Democrat in 2020.

Schmidt resigned from the board of the Lincoln Project in 2021 after another co-founder, John Weaver, was accused of sexually harassing young men for years.

Now, he is threatening the Daily Caller with a lawsuit for reporting on the restraining order, which appears to be in the court record in Utah and would be considered newsworthy, based on the fame and past habits Schmidt has had of attacking others for their behavior.

The Lincoln Project is a Super PAC developed by Schmidt and other former Republican political operatives, who are dedicated to opposing Donald Trump and any Republican candidate who is vulnerable. It nearly collapsed in 2021, but has been back in action during the 2022 cycle.