Thursday, July 24, 2025
Home Blog Page 569

House passes governor’s bill to increase penalties on drug dealers

Suzanne Downing
-
20
House passes governor’s bill to increase penalties on drug dealers

The Alaska House of Representatives has passed the governor’s bill, HB 66, which establishes harsher penalties for those who have distributed drugs that directly lead to a user’s death, including fentanyl. It’s now in the Senate for consideration, but the legislative session ends next Tuesday, and it may be a bill that is held until next year.

HB 66 was crafted to combat the State’s drug problem at the distribution point. By putting drug dealers on notice with harsher penalties and less leniency for first-time offenders, the Alaska House Majority and governor hope for fewer fentanyl deaths.

“Alaska has been hit hard by fentanyl. It’s imperative that we take action to address it,” said Speaker Cathy Tilton. “House Bill 66 is an important step in that direction. We are sending a clear message that those who engage in these dangerous activities will be held accountable for their actions. This is about justice for the victims and their families and ensuring that our communities are safe.”

The Department of Health’s 2021 Drug Overdose Mortality Update shows that Alaska experienced the largest percent increase of drug overdose deaths compared to all other states. While fentanyl is not the sole perpetrator, it remains one of the leading causes of overdose deaths, and the numbers continue to climb.

“This drug has caused countless deaths in our state, and we must do everything in our power to prevent more Alaskans from falling victim to its devastating effects,” said Rep. Craig Johnson, chair of the Rules Committee. “I am thankful to the governor for submitting the bill to us, grateful for our members working diligently toward its passage, and optimistic that the Senate will take swift action so we can show our cities and towns that their elected officials care about their health and safety.”

The House majority said it’s a critical moment for Alaska’s defense against drugs and those who distribute them.

“The Alaska House Majority anticipates swift passage through the Senate. While we recognize there is more that must be done to protect our communities and homes across the state, we are proud of this vital step forward,” the caucus stated.

Win Gruening: Connecting the dots on Alaska’s higher cost of living

SENIOR CONTRIBUTOR
-
11
Win Gruening: Connecting the dots on Alaska’s higher cost of living

By WIN GRUENING

It’s no secret that Alaska continues to be among the most expensive states in the country in which to live.  

Our state legislature, nearing adjournment, will likely fail to reach a long-term solution that balances changes to the Permanent Fund and taxes to help address the rising cost of living.

According to a recent survey by the Alaska Department of Labor, housing became less affordable in all parts of Alaska in 2022. Alaska’s three largest cities usually rank 30% higher than the national average in the overall cost-of-living index which covers 56 other items in addition to housing.  Groceries, utilities, and healthcare, in particular, are among the highest. 

Meanwhile, Alaskans’ per capita income has shrunk in relation to the rest of the U. S.

It seems likely that a tax revenue measure may emerge from the Legislature this year, propelling Alaska’s cost of living even higher.

This will be further aggravated by statewide demographic changes that are not in dispute.  Outmigration patterns and lower birthrates signal a trend that will be hard to reverse.  As Alaska’s population ages and the number of our working-age Alaskans decline, we will see even more “labor shortages, slow or stag­nant economic growth, less consumer demand, increased dependency ratios, and difficulty funding social programs.”

Without any major state-wide economic projects or an increase in oil prices on the short-term horizon, local municipalities will be tasked with tempering these impacts through proactive initiatives and tax and regulation policies. If locally elected officials fail to recognize these connections, it will exacerbate the problem.

Examples continue to occur around the state where city leaders squander opportunities to expand their local economy, spend unwisely, and rely too heavily on increasing taxes. 

This is the exact opposite of what local governments should be doing to lower the long-term cost of living in their communities.

One of most important levers available to local governments is their ability to foster economic growth. When bureaucracy, over-regulation, NIMBY-ism, and resistance to change rule the day, companies and entrepreneurs look elsewhere to do business. The promotion of foundational economic growth is necessary to stabilize the working-age population, increase the tax base and thereby lower the overall cost of living.

In Juneau, anti-cruise and anti-mine activists fail to appreciate the contributions core industries make to Juneau’s economy.  The visitor/cruise industry is responsible for nearly half of Juneau’s collected sales taxes.  Juneau’s two mines are collectively one of Juneau’s largest employers and its largest property taxpayer.

In light of this, a reasonable question might be, what efforts have our elected officials taken recently to  encourage and support these industries?

Since 2020, Greens Creek Mine has been seeking a routine expansion of its operation on Admiralty Island 18 miles outside of Juneau.  Mine operations could shut down by 2025 unless this expansion is approved. Predictably, by claiming their study shows the mine has caused environmental damage, opposition by a local environmental group may stall the expansion. Both the Forest Service and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation have disputed this questionable study. Thus far, the City and Borough of Juneau (CBJ) Assembly has written one letter of support.

CBJ is currently reviewing a request by Huna Totem Corporation to build Aak’w Landing, a new cruise ship dock in downtown Juneau.  Potentially, this development could attract an estimated $150 million in private investment when all phases are complete. The city began the process by allocating $300,000 for a duplicative study intended to facilitate CBJ planners in micro-managing the project. It remains to be seen if city bureaucracy eventually kills the development.

The CBJ Assembly recently reversed its initial position and denied a permit request for a locally established company, iRide, to operate limited e-bike tours on a remote city-owned gravel road. The new tour would have supported new jobs and mitigated downtown cruise impacts.

Meanwhile, food banks in Juneau (and across the state) are dealing with a long-standing hunger crisis worsened by the pandemic and inflation. Businesses and homeowners are struggling with a precipitous increase in Juneau’s real property taxes. The Assembly’s response has been to propose $120 million in new government buildings.

Furthering the economy, lowering the property tax millage rate, and more prudent government spending will lower the cost of living.

When will city leaders connect the dots?

After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening became a regular opinion page columnist for the Juneau Empire. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations.

Win Gruening: Juneau spending up, taxes up, population flat

Win Gruening: Legislature dives into perilous waters with state workforce, retirement issues

Alex Gimarc: On gerrymandering, the North Carolina decision changes everything

SENIOR CONTRIBUTOR
-
11
Alex Gimarc: On gerrymandering, the North Carolina decision changes everything

By ALEX GIMARC

The Alaska Supreme Court has been mucking around in the redistricting wars for over 40 years.  This year was no exception, as the justices issued a ruling striking down the Redistricting Board map that favored Republicans and replaced it with their own map that favored democrats.  

Suzanne Downing a few weeks ago captured the game nicely, pointing out that apparently gerrymandering is bad unless done to favor Democrats, which automatically is a good thing to the Alaska Supremes.  

Fritz Pettyjohn: 40 years of judicial activism on the Alaska Supreme Court, but Dunleavy can just say ‘no’

The case has been remanded to Superior Court where the Redistricting Board has 90 days to argue in favor of their final map and against the judicial takeover of the redistricting process. 

It would seem a lost cause, as the Alaska Supremes just anointed themselves the redistricting board in the future, and that the only allowable gerrymandering is that which favors democrats in the future.  

What has changed since they disgorged their 144-page list of legal excuses installing themselves as an extraconstitutional Redistricting Board?

North Carolina changed. And with it, maybe the entire shape of redistricting wars at the state level nationwide.

North Carolina is nominally a purple state, not unlike what Virginia has become over the last several decades, with a Democrat governor, the occasional Republican legislature, and an elected Supreme Court that swings from side to side. 

Breitbart: North Carolina Supreme Court strikes down redistricting maps

They are not so different from Alaska, with a very liberal judiciary, a closely split legislature, and the occasional Democrat governor (Gov. Bill Walker was our last one).

The last time Democrats were in charge of the whole mess, the Democrat majority on their Supreme Court struck down a Republican-drawn redistricting map by a 4-3 vote. 

This effort was led by Mark Elias, the legal point man for all Democrat attempts to rewrite state election laws and redistricting maps over the last couple decades.  Elias has his grubby little fingerprints all over the successful challenge and the NC Supreme Court opinion throwing it out.

But elections have consequences, and today there is a solid Republican majority on the NC Supreme Court and in the legislature. That court issued a couple opinions over the last few weeks. One reinstated the original redistricting map; the other reinstating a photo ID for voting.  You can find the 218 page redistricting opinion here.

It is an interesting read, as the majority noted that the state courts are not the place to decide policy fights, an opinion that echoes the Supreme Court “Dodd Opinion” on abortion last year, moving it from the high court back to the state legislatures to figure out.

If you take a look at the 144-page exercise in legalistic excuse making issued by the Alaska Supremes, you’ll be quickly struck by the incredibly twisted logic of the majority, noting that discrimination is bad unless they are the ones that get to do the discriminating; gerrymandering is bad unless they are the ones that get to do it; and the actions and interests of every single participant in the process ultimately meaningless unless their (the Alaska Supremes’) chosen side (Democrats in this case), get what they want.  

Basically, their action in adopting the democrat map completely undermines their excuse for throwing out the Redistricting Board’s original map.  

This is not impartial.  This is the majority installing themselves as a super legislature.  

If it were me, I’d march into court with the North Carolina opinion and point out that the courts are installing themselves as a political body in this, something unconstitutional under both the US and Alaska Constitutions, neither of which allow courts at any level to determine the apportionment for voting.  I’d also point out the mutually exclusive rationale and action by the Alaska Supreme Court.  

When the trial court and the Alaska Supremes issue their final ruling, installing the democrat map as state law, I’d appeal the entire mess to federal court with the argument that the Alaska courts are acting extra constitutionally, something they’ve been doing with elections for years.

I get it that redistricting is fundamentally a political process, and like all political processes here in the US, it is noisy, ugly, and chaotic. But that is our system of governance. 

When the courts install themselves as the ultimate arbiters of policy, they usurp the political power of everyone else in the state. 

When they actively exercise that usurped power in favor of one side of the political divide, they have ceased being judges and moved smartly into the realm of authoritarians and dictators, which I suppose is a cleaner form of governance, though it is hardly American.  

Alex Gimarc lives in Anchorage since retiring from the military in 1997. His interests include science and technology, environment, energy, economics, military affairs, fishing and disabilities policies. His weekly column “Interesting Items” is a summary of news stories with substantive Alaska-themed topics. He was a small business owner and Information Technology professional.

Brace for impact: Title 42 expiration means illegal immigration will triple, Sen. Sullivan warns

Suzanne Downing
-
44
Brace for impact: Title 42 expiration means illegal immigration will triple, Sen. Sullivan warns

The Trump-era Title 42 policy for the U.S-Mexico border, expires Thursday.

A border that is largely being controlled by Mexico-based drug cartels and human traffickers has seen millions of illegal immigrants streaming across it over the past two years, and it’s about to get a lot worse, as the Biden Administration gives up the sovereignty of the country and the security of her borders by allowing Title 42 to expire.

U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan on Thursday called the situation an unprecedented catastrophe.

“The biggest falsehood being peddled in Washington, D.C. right now and to the American people is that our border is secure,” he said in a press conference today.

“There have been more than six million illegal crossings since President Biden assumed office. Now that Title 42 is expiring, daily illegal crossings are expected to triple. Alaskans and Americans in all 50 states are experiencing the toll of this avoidable tragedy,” Sullivan said in a written statement.

Border Patrol agents have been instructed to release illegal immigrants into the country without any requirement for a court hearing. Over 40,000 have amassed at the border in anticipation of the flood gates opening. In Mexican towns along the Rio Grande, stores have not been able to keep up with inventory of pool floats and life jackets for migrants preparing to swim across the Rio Grande River into Brownsville Texas. In Tijuana, thousands have been camping along the border fence waiting for Thursday.

Border Patrol Chief Raul Ortiz sent the instructions Wednesday, asking senior officials in the agency to begin the mass parole of illegal migrants ahead of the end of Title 42, according to The Daily Caller, which received exclusive documentation of the new parole policy. The illegal immigrants will be “parole[d] with conditions,” that require them to schedule a court date with Immigration and Customs Enforcement or request service of a Notice to Appear according to the instructions. But they’re being paroled into America with no tracking technology, and will be completely unsupervised.

“It is a humanitarian crisis. It is a national security crisis. It is a health crisis. Hundreds of thousands of children have been trafficked and exploited. Based on the numbers of those apprehended, it is obvious that thousands of criminals, including individuals on the terrorist watch-list, are illegally entering our country. Drug overdoses – largely driven by fentanyl – are now the leading cause of death for Americans ages 18 to 45. In 2021, drug overdose deaths in Alaska increased by the largest percentage of any state,” Sullivan’s statement said.

“Even the most rural parts of Alaska are feeling the impact of Biden’s open southern border. And believe me, it is wide open. Anyone in the Biden administration or media who continues to peddle the falsehood that the border is secure should just go there and watch illegal immigrants cross the Rio Grande in the middle of the night by the hundreds.

“As I’ve said before, this is a dereliction of duty by the President. President Biden has created a tragedy of immense proportions. In his first 100 days, Joe Biden stopped construction of the border wall, halted deportations and suspended the successful ‘remain in Mexico’ policy. He continues to threaten to veto legislation that would mandate many proven solutions and also continues to advocate for real cuts to the Border Patrol. The President needs to do his job, enforce the law, and end the incentives feeding this crisis immediately.”

Sullivan is a co-sponsor of the Border Security Act which would redirect $15 billion from IRS enforcement funds that were included in the Inflation Reduction Act to instead be spent on border security. The legislation is endorsed by the National Border Patrol Council, the exclusive representative of approximately 18,000 Border Patrol agents and support personnel assigned to the U.S. Border Patrol.

In March 2021, Sullivan visited the southern border on a congressional delegation trip with U.S. Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), John Thune (R-S.D.), John Barrasso (R-Wyo.), Susan Collins (R-Maine), John Hoeven (R-N.D.), Mike Lee (R-Utah), Steve Daines (R-Mont.), Cindy Hyde-Smith (R-Miss.), and Mike Braun (R-Ind.).

In August 2022, all 50 Senate Democrats blocked Senator Sullivan’s amendment to the Inflation Reduction Act that would have directed $500 million to be allocated to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection to secure the southern border. The funds were instead earmarked for sustainability and environmental programs at the Department of Homeland Security.

David Williams: Devastating Alaska’s oil industry won’t help taxpayers

Suzanne Downing
-
9
David Williams: Devastating Alaska’s oil industry won’t help taxpayers

By DAVID WILLIAMS | TAXPAYER PROTECTION ALLIANCE

Alaska is at a crossroads. The state is facing a challenging budget situation that has been exacerbated by inflation, Covid, and the Biden Administration’s failed economic policies. Which road it chooses now will determine its economic future. One road leads to renewed prosperity. The other leads to more economic pain for consumers and taxpayers.

The Taxpayers Protection Alliance has seen successful models for how to grow a state economy out of fiscal challenges. TPA has also seen how bad ideas can make a difficult situation much worse. 

A state like Alaska doesn’t always want the advice of groups from the Lower 48 states.  However, the currently proposed 40% tax on oil and gas production in Alaska is one of the most extreme examples of a disastrous idea for any state’s economy.

On paper, this tax hike might raise substantial revenue, but in the real world it would backfire and create economic and fiscal devastation. At a time when the oil and gas industry is under daily assault from the Biden administration and green activists, Alaska’s energy industry would be driven to other states and countries. The jobs, businesses, and revenue it generates – including threatening the future of critical oil drilling projects like Willow and Pikka on the North Slope – would go along with it.

Worse, the proposed tax hikes unfairly target small and medium-sized businesses that are the backbone of Alaska’s economy. These companies have been particularly important to Alaska’s economy in recent years because they are less susceptible to pressure from outside environmental groups.

As larger corporations have pulled back from Alaska to avoid attacks from activists, these small and medium-sized businesses have increasingly picked up the slack and powered Alaska’s economy.

It makes no sense why Alaska would consider this act of self-sabotage. Extreme environmental activists are working to capitalize on Alaska’s budget problems and deal a major blow against energy producers in the state, eliminating critical Alaska jobs in the process. With the Biden Administration already doing their bidding at the federal level, states like Alaska are the last refuge for responsible energy production.  

Gov. Mike Dunleavy is building a legacy as a real conservative and a more than capable governor. Rejecting these tax hikes would be in keeping with this legacy. One reason why Gov. Dunleavy became the first Alaska Governor in 25 years to win re-election is because he kept his word not to raise taxes on Alaskans without a statewide referendum. Voters typically reward politicians who keep their promises. Energy independence, especially with geopolitical threats from adversaries like China and Russia looming, is as important as it has ever been. Gov. Dunleavy has championed these efforts. Now is not the time to abandon those principles.

Many political leaders – including conservative and moderate Democrats – are standing up to reject these reckless tax hikes. They should be applauded for their willingness to put Alaska first despite the overwhelming outside pressure being exerted on the state.

Alaska’s energy industry has been a critical part of its economy for decades, and it will continue to be so for years to come. The state has abundant natural resources that provide good-paying jobs, support local businesses, and contribute significantly to the state’s revenue. A tax hike on oil and gas production will only serve to weaken Alaska’s economy, harm its citizens, and hinder America’s energy security.

Alaska’s leaders must reject these reckless tax hikes on energy production and focus instead on strengthening Alaska’s energy economy, encouraging the creation of good paying jobs, and protecting America’s national security. This approach will ensure that Alaska’s energy industry continues to thrive, even in the face of challenging economic times.

With the war on energy harming Americans every single day, the last thing needed is more states piling on, too – especially energy producing states like Alaska. 

David Williams is the President of the Taxpayers Protection Alliance. This column first appeared at Real Clear Energy. Top photo copyright by Rob Bussell.

Town hall: CNN pulls plug early after Trump fields an hour of ‘gotcha’ questions

Suzanne Downing
-
125
Town hall: CNN pulls plug early after Trump fields an hour of ‘gotcha’ questions

Depending on which media you are with, former President Donald Trump either destroyed CNN, or started telling lies the minute he went onstage in his much-anticipated town hall, hosted by a news organization that has been his nemesis.

For days before the event, leftists had flooded CNN with requests to not give Trump a microphone on the network.

Trump supporters were jubilant at his performance on Wednesday night.

“Former President Donald Trump steamrolled CNN’s Kaitlan Collins during Wednesday’s Townhall event in New Hampshire, dismissing her politically biased and outdated questions, effectively reducing her role as the moderator by speaking directly to the audience about the “gotcha” topics a visibly irritated Collins continually posed throughout the night,” Breitbart wrote about the event, in which Trump outperformed Collins on every topic, including his recent conviction in the E. Jean Carroll sexual assault trial in Manhattan.

Slate, a leftist publication, thought it went so badly for the network that it wrote, “Donald Trump’s CNN Town Hall Was a Disaster. If this is how the network plans to cover 2024, its CEO might as well resign now.” The writer went on to call Trump a liar and sociopath.

The New York Times wrote, “Trump’s Falsehoods and Bluster Overtake CNN Town Hall. Facing questions from the audience and the moderator, Donald Trump insisted, falsely, that the 2020 election was rigged. He also dodged questions on abortion, praised Jan. 6 rioters and mocked E. Jean Carroll.”

Although CNN pulled the plug on the event as much as 25 minutes earlier than expected, Trump got a standing ovation from the live audience when he took to the stage, and received a rousing response throughout the nearly 70 minutes

“Do you have any regrets about your actions on Jan. 6 [2021]?” Collins asked Trump, who responded by going through the day’s events, moment by moment.

“I said, walk peacefully and patriotically, you know, many different things. In fact, I brought a list of things. I don’t want to bore the audience, but we can go sentence after sentence after sentence of things,” he said. He reminded Collins that he had offered security, including the military, at the Capitol, an offer that was turned away by Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

He also criticized the officer who shot and killed protester Ashli Babbitt, labeling him a thug and calling Babbitt a patriot. He said he would pardon most Jan. 6 participants who had been convicted, which brought an outburst of cheering from the audience.

The topic turned to the recent sexual assault accusations against him by E. Jean Carroll.

Trump said that Carroll’s version of the story was ridiculous, that they met at the door of a department store, one that he has rarely listed, “And this is when I met her and I was immediately attracted to her and she was immediately attracted to me. And we had this crowded department store. We had this great chemistry,” he continued, weaving Carroll’s side of the story. He noted that Carroll had a cat named “Vagina,” but that the judge would not allow that on the record, while allowing all kinds of unrelated material from Carroll.

The grilling by Collins turned toward classification and declassification of presidential documents — those found in Trump’s home and those found in then-Vice President Joe Biden’s home.

“I have every right to under the Presidential Records Act,” keep documents of his presidency, he said pointing out the boxes and boxes the Biden had in his possession and then saying, “The vice president cannot declassify. He didn’t have the right to declassify.”

Collins pressed: “That’s the question that investigators have, I think is why you held on to those documents when you knew the federal government was seeking them and then had given you a subpoena to return.”

Trump, who was being interrupted by Collins repeatedly, said, “Can I talk?”

“Yeah, what’s the answer,” Collins replied.

“Do you mind?” Trump asked.

“I would like for you to answer. That’s why I asked it,” she snarked.

“It’s very simple. You are nasty person, OK?” Trump said, which caused members of the audience to break into cheering.

The president responded to questions about the war in Ukraine, and said he would end the war in Ukraine in just one day, if he’s elected.

“I don’t think in terms of winning and losing. I think in terms of getting it settled so we stop killing all these people,” he said. When Collins asked him to choose a side, he would not take the bait, saying instead, “I want everyone to stop dying.”

But CNN cut the town hall short. It was just not going as the network had planned.

Rep. Matt Gaetz called it the equivalent of a “mercy rule,” because Trump had vanquished his opponent, Collins, who wore a white suit in the style of liberal women who are making a “suffragette” statement regarding women’s rights. Her body language as she moderated the debate she was having with Trump showed that she was on her guard, with her legs turned away from him, and her arms folded across her midriff.

Jake Tapper had a different reaction than Gaetz: “It was an interesting night. Mr. Trump’s first lie was told just seconds into the night … and the falsehoods kept coming fast and furious.”

12 state attorney generals call for crackdowns on gas cooking stoves

Suzanne Downing
-
38
12 state attorney generals call for crackdowns on gas cooking stoves

It’s not just New York State that is banning gas stoves. Twelve Democrat state attorneys general signed a letter to federal regulators this week calling for strict regulations on gas cooking stoves, arguing that they are unhealthy, and looking to the federal government to begin educating the public against the cooking tools.

The move started late last year, when U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commissioner Richard Trumka Jr. said publicly the agency will in 2023 take action against household gas stoves, which he says are linked to asthma and other respiratory issues.

Trumka was put on the commission by President Joe Biden in 2021. Biden has stated he is not in favor of banning gas stoves. With a public uproar and pushback against Trumka and Biden, the job of getting the public to turn against gas stoves was sent to the Democrat-run states. The political ramifications for Biden were becoming too hot.

The May 8 letter to the Consumer Product Safety Commission beseeches the federal commission to do something to “reduce the harms associated with gas stoves due to their disproportionate impact on underserved communities.”

“Underserved communities” is the Democrat euphemism for poor communities.

Multistate-Comments-to-CPSC-Chronic-Hazards-Associated-with-Gas-StovesDownload

“Not only should gas stoves be made safer for consumers, but consumers should be provided with sufficient information about potential health hazards and risks in advance of any purchase so they can make informed decisions about whether or not to install a gas stove in their home,” the attorneys general wrote. “Proper labeling on gas stoves would represent an important step in helping to educate consumers about the health risks associated with gas stoves. Providing this information upfront is essential to enabling consumers to make a fully informed decision.”

Signing the letter were the AGs of District of Columbia, Delaware, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New York, Rhode Island, Oregon, Vermont, Washington, and the City of New York.

New York State recently banned new gas appliances in new construction and Berkeley, Calif. has done the same.

Downing: Biden Administration plays with fire
War on gas stoves heats up as fad-following regulators take fresh aim at banning them everywhere in America

Hold my beer: Bud Light tanks Anheuser-Busch stock to ‘hold’

Suzanne Downing
-
19
Hold my beer: Bud Light tanks Anheuser-Busch stock to ‘hold’

HSBC has downgraded the stock of Anheuser-Busch to a “hold” status after the company continues to suffer from a consumer boycott over the Bud Light partnership with a cringy TikTok celebrity, Dylan Mulvaney.

Mulvaney, a man who has appeared on social media sites as a pubescent girl, was highlighted with his face on the cans of Bud Light in April, in celebration of his “one year of being a girl.” Ads featuring Mulvaney in bubble bath surrounded by cans of beer that had his face on it infuriated the Bud Light consumers, who wanted nothing to do with the pretend-a-gender wars.

HSBC’s rating advises not to buy or sell shares of AB InBev until the company recovers from its sales having cratered in recent weeks. According to Carlos Laboy, managing director for the global beverage sector of HSBC, AB InBev has done a poor job of responding to the crisis in confidence in its brand.

HSBC Holdings is a British multinational bank and financial services holding company. It is the largest bank in Europe by total assets, and serves 39 million customers through its global wealth, personal banking, commercial banking and global banking.

Sales of Bud Light were down 23.4% year over year for the week of April 29, according to data from NielsenIQ, a consumer analytics firm, and Bump Williams Consulting. That meant Bud Light sales dropped to $71.6 million that week.

Other A-B brands are being affected: Michelob Ultra was off 4.4%, to $60.2 million.

At the same time, competitor beer brands saw growth in sales: Coors Light was up 20.3%, to $56.7 million, while Miller Lite was up 20.6%, to $49.2 million.

“It’s not just a Bud Light issue,” Bump Consulting CEO Bump Williams told the New York Post. “It’s an Anheuser-Busch portfolio problem now.”

While some bars have pulled the Bud Light products from their offerings, the company has attempted to walk back its mistake. So far, consumers have not been in a forgiving mood — according to the data.

The AB InBev stock price was $66.57 at the beginning of April, as the Dylan Mulvaney partnership was revealed. Today’s closing price was $61.81.

Downing: Hey Bud, real marketers of genius don’t hate their customers
Bud Light marketing veep gets replaced after transgender ad flop

Bronson’s chief fiscal officer resigns

Suzanne Downing
-
22
Bronson’s chief fiscal officer resigns

Mayor Dave Bronson announced that Chief Fiscal Officer Grant Yutrzenka submitted his resignation. Yutrzenka’s last day with the Municipality will be May 19th.

Yutrzenka served in an acting and official CFO capacity since September 2022 when Bronson appointed him to the role. Yutrzenka previously served the Municipality as the Assistant General Manager and Chief Financial Officer for the Anchorage Water and Wastewater Utility.

Mayor Bronson appoints new chief fiscal officer

“I have enjoyed my time as CFO and thank Mayor Bronson for his confidence in me,” said Mr. Yutrzenka. “I look forward to spending more time with my family and enjoying the great outdoors this summer.”

“Grant’s leadership skills and strong financial mind will be sorely missed in City Hall. I wish him nothing but the best going forward,” Bronson said.  

The search for a replacement CFO has begun. Yutrzenka has committed to helping find a replacement and will work with the new CFO through the transition phase.

Adam Trombley steps up to be mayor’s chief of staff
Mayor Bronson names Mario Bird acting chief of staff; Trombley quits
1...568569570...1,689Page 569 of 1,689

About us

Must Read Alaska is news of people, politics, policy, culture, and happenings in Alaska.

Contact
4021 West Hill Road,
Homer, AK 99603
[email protected]

The latest

Dramatic video: Alaska Airlines jet hits deer on runway in Kodiak

The 907 0
An Alaska Airlines Boeing 737 struck at least two...

Breaking: Sen. Shelley Hughes making ‘major’ announcement at public event in Palmer

Politics 3
Alaska State Sen. Shelley Hughes is set to make...

Win Gruening: Nick Begich III is hitting it out of the ballpark in Congress

Columns 4
By WIN GRUENING Since winning Alaska’s lone US House seat...

© Must Read Alaska