Saturday, August 8, 2026
Home Blog Page 430

Win Gruening: Ignoring the consequences of ship-free Saturdays?

By WIN GRUENING

Backers of a cruise initiative to block large cruise ships from docking in Juneau on Saturdays and the 4th of July say they have sufficient signatures to place the question on the ballot.

Now voters need to decide whether or not to vote for it on Oct. 1.

The “Ship-Free” social media campaign pages suggest that Juneau’s skies are choked with smoke, its waters fouled by pollution, hiking trails are overcrowded, and its downtown core is unlivable.

That isn’t the truth and most Juneauites know it.

Initiative boosters have accused opponents of the measure of ignoring quality of life issues and only caring about the economic benefits of the visitor industry.

But who is actually ignoring the consequences?

The economic benefits of the visitor industry directly enhance Juneau’s annual budget as well as its quality of life. To dismiss those benefits as less important is dishonest. 

Recognizing those contributions requires more than lip service. Can we start from an initial common set of facts and engage in honest communication?

Cruise supporters have, from the outset, acknowledged industry impacts, and have been willing to work to alleviate them. The Ship-Free folks are more interested in sabotaging the public process instead of working toward mutually achievable goals. 

Regrettably, this type of initiative campaign often devolves into an overwrought, fact-free litany of misconceptions and half-truths about the industry.

The initiative declares that “excess human presence… sullies the sentient, sacred, divine, and living ancestral natural environment necessary for cultural and spiritual health and growth.”

It says the city “failed to balance the economic benefits to some against the economic and other harms of the many.”

“Harm” is a very strong word that usually conveys deliberately inflicted physical injury. This emotional narrative discounts a long-standing cooperative relationship that has successfully mitigated many visitor impacts. The Ship-Free petition seeks to undermine years of successful, good-faith collaboration engaged in by the city and the industry.

Visitor industry businesses and their employees are actively engaged members of the community who contribute generously to a myriad of civic and non-profit endeavors. The cruise industry has agreed to liberal uses of passenger fees (over $20 million annually) allowing them to be allocated for a variety of projects benefiting all of Juneau, not just cruise passengers.

An Alaska DEC science panel concluded that cruise ship water treatment systems, “are the most advanced, effective, and proven treatment systems available and…are significantly more effective than most municipal systems.” Cruise ship smoke emissions are abated by state-of-the-art technology. Juneau, in concert with the industry, was the first port in the world to offer environmentally-friendly (hydroelectric) shore power for ships.

Under industry-backed Tourism Best Management Practices, many voluntary policies have been implemented including avoiding certain streets, local parks and trails, reducing flightseeing noise, staging traffic to minimize congestion, enacting stricter whale-watching rules, and staffing a Tourism Hot-Line for potential complaints.

Initiative sponsors are also short-circuiting the work of Juneau’s citizen-backed Visitor Industry Task Force. The initiative imposes a vote on a question neither the public nor the CBJ Assembly had a voice in formulating, despite the fact the city and industry just successfully concluded negotiations limiting daily passenger visitation.

Eighty-five large cruise ships are scheduled to visit Juneau in 2025 on Saturday and July 4, representing about 12% of all port calls. It will be almost impossible to accommodate them on other days due to scheduling conflicts, and the VITF-recommended 5-ship limit and proposed ban on “hot berthing”.

While estimates vary, when including purchases by passengers, crewmembers, and cruise lines, as well as passenger fees, the loss of direct spending could approach $40 million per year. City revenues could be reduced by $4 million annually. 

Can the Ship-Free boosters point to city programs and services that should be slashed to offset the revenue reduction? With city leaders loath to cut expenditures, Juneau property owners can expect their property taxes to increase commensurately. 

Juneau’s success in resolving tourism impacts argues for promoting cooperation, allowing voluntary limits to work, and negotiating changes if necessary.

Furthermore, the legality of blocking ships from visiting Juneau is questionable and most likely will be tested in court.

Juneau voters can decide which they prefer: expensive litigation or continuing collaboration.

After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening became a regular opinion page columnist for the Juneau Empire. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations.

Five days into Pride Month and who’s playing? NPS

For the past few years, Alaska Airlines took the lead in Pride Month antics, with videos, special fights to San Francisco, and extensive features on LGBTQAI+ workforce. This year, the airline has dialed it back a bit, keeping its pride videos off of X/Twitter and instead putting them on Instagram, where the crowd is decidedly more liberal and where Meta exerts its authority. Other airlines have also mellowed out on the Pride capers.

To note how much more liberal the Instagram crowd is, the drag queen post above by the Kenai Fjords division of the National Park Service received over 5,700 of “likes” in just one day, while a Kenai Fjords NPS post honoring Military Appreciation Month received only 183 “likes” in five days.

Pride Month, as designated by executive proclamation by the president, most urban mayors and Democrat-run states, fathers parades and social media celebrations by the FBI, the NSA, and every other alphabet agency of the federal government, including the National Park Service, whose Instagram account for Kenai Fjords National Park took the lead in Alaska.

Among those not acknowledging the sexual celebration month, so far, are at least teams of the National Football League, including Pittsburgh Steelers, Cleveland Browns, Cincinnati Bengals, Tennessee Titans, Kansas City Chiefs, Denver Broncos, Dallas Cowboys, Green Bay Packers, New Orleans Saints, Atlanta Falcons and even the Seattle Seahawks have balked at putting the rainbow on everything, sticking to a re-post from Lumen Field, the team’s home arena.

Bud Light has chosen to focus its social media on a “fight night” theme on Instagram and X this month, whistling past the graveyard it dug for itself during the Dylan Mulvaney marketing fiasco of 2023. It launched Pride Month with a push for Ultimate Fighting Championship bouts, altogether the opposite of Mulvaney’s prepubescent girly come-on campaign from last year.

Dustin Poirier – The Diamond UFC fighter – promoting Bud Light during Pride Month.

Lawfare: One person filed 5,590 civil rights complaints with Department of Education in 2023

By BRENDAN CLAREY | CHALKBOARD NEWS

Over two-thirds of all Title IX complaints came from one individual to the Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights, as the agency seeks to increase its staff for the next fiscal year. 

The branch of the education agency that enforces federal funding statutes tied to civil rights legislation said 5,590 out of 8,151 complaints related to alleged sex discrimination came from one person, continuing a consistent trend where an individual has filed thousands of cases every year. 

According to the annual report to the president and secretary of education, the OCR said that it had seen the largest number of complaints ever during the 2023 fiscal year (FY).

“In FY 2023, OCR confronted the highest volume of complaints in our history, receiving 19,201 complaints,” the report reads. “That number represented a 2% increase over our previous record high in FY 2022 of 18,804 complaints.”

“Nonetheless, we kept pace with the high volume, resolving 16,448 cases compared to the previous fiscal year’s 16,515 cases, and achieving the third highest number of complaint resolutions in OCR history,” the report reads. 

The report later highlights that the vast majority, nearly 69% of complaints related to allegations of sex-based discrimination were filed by one individual, which moved the majority of complaints away from disability allegations.

“In FY 2023, however, a single individual filed 5,590 complaints raising sex discrimination allegations,” the report reads. “This high volume altered the ratio of complaint filings for this fiscal year.”

Put another way, the individual would have had to file an average of over 15 complaints every day, including weekends and holidays. 

As The 74 reported last year, there were 18,804 civil rights complaints filed last year, but nearly 7,400 Title IX-related ones were filled by one individual. That person was reportedly the same one who filed over 6,000 claims in 2016. 

Under former Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, the OCR changed its case processing manual to allow staff to dismiss complaints filed by the same individual, as was reported by The New York Times in 2018. 

Catherine E. Lhamon, the current and former assistant secretary for civil rights during the Obama administration, criticized the decision at the time, saying the OCR should never filter cases and that the OCR should function more like the Justice Department. 

“The thing that scares me is when they get to say ‘we won’t open some cases because it’s too much for us,’ or ‘we don’t like the complainant,’ or ‘it’s not our week to work on that,’ you start to change the character of the office,” Lhamon told The New York Times in 2018.

In a request to Congress asking for more federal taxpayer funds to operate the OCR, the Department of Education cited its increasing caseload, which includes those filed by the individual complainant.

The OCR is asking for nearly $20 million more in fiscal year 2025 to hire 86 more full-time enforcement employees, according to a congressional justification document. That document said that the agency’s funding for employees “have not kept pace with case demand” with funding for three fewer employees since 2013. 

“At the same time, the number of complaints received increased by 93%, from 9,950 complaints in fiscal year 2013 to 19,201 in fiscal year 2023, which is the highest total complaints received on record,” the justification document reads.

EaglExit: Summary of local government options, citizenship, and American Republicanism

By FORREST A. NABORS, PhD

Part I of a four-part series

A borough charter is a form of a constitution, or, an organic law of a people by which a government is framed and maintained. 

The purpose or end of a constitution is the kind of government and way of life that the framers of the constitution wish to have.

The general character of a people – their convictions, habits, customs – and the form of their government shape each other and depend upon each other.

Therefore, the framers of new constitutions of all types must consider what kind of government and way of life they wish to have and what kind of government the existing character of their people can support. 

That is, existing conditions – the existing character of a people – constrain what framers of constitutions can immediately do. The saying, “Rome cannot be built in a day,” captures this point. The constitution of a people and the character of a people must fit each other.

However, Rome was built and can be built, albeit over many days. A wisely constructed constitution can cement the pathway of a political society’s future development towards loftier achievements.

Let us assume that aim of the founding generation of the new borough is that the government will be frugal, fair and effective in securing the safety of the people. These are simpler, attainable ends, which can be achieved by drawing from common sense and experience. Prudent institutional devices can be framed that limit future opportunities for corruption, profligacy, injustice and inefficiency.

It is also within the range of local government to do more in securing the happiness of the people consistent with liberty. This is a harder task than say, inexpensive and sanitary garbage disposal, but today, is a necessary task, because liberty in our country is fading. As this paper will contend, one of the few, powerful resources left to renew liberty in America is local political societies.

A wisely-constituted and administered local government can re-animate those virtues from which American government in its original form sprang, and upon which all of our governments – local, state and federal – always depended: intelligence, honesty, industry, frugality, self-reliance, self-respect, courage, good will, modesty, charity, etc. 

At its origin, American republicanism was, in fact, the simple government and way of life of one local community. A tiny group of English settlers, far fewer than the population of Eagle River today, formed the nucleus of the colony of Massachusetts Bay beginning in 1620. Led by their faith, those settlers developed a way of life and a style of local government that grew, matured and then spread. Their small political society became a model, replicated by other townships and other colonies. The character of the New England people was such that when tyranny violently confronted them in 1775, they could not submit. It was easier for them to die than to surrender their liberty.

Admiring them, the other colonies joined them in rebellion. When the battle was won, the other colonies, now states, adopted New England’s system of government. New England republicanism became American republicanism, broadcast across the North American continent, superadding new states, also modeled on the image of the New England, and finally including Alaska in 1959. 

Is that character achievable today? Americans look around themselves in 2024 and are mortified. A sense of loss, as if a beloved member of the family had died, cuts into the souls of millions of us. We hear the “mystic chords of memory” within us, but when we look around, the song we hear is a sad dirge for the death of American principles and our old virtues. Many who understand and love what we once were, confess that they can barely recognize our country today.

Yet in reviewing the case of the first shipload of settlers on the Mayflower, we must admit that from little things, great things are born, and from fragile beginnings, strength and greatness. Hounded by relentless religious persecution, they crossed the dangerous North Atlantic, formed a political compact – a constitution – cut an embryonic republic out of the howling wilderness and entrusted their fate to God. Their only care was to build a “City on a Hill,” a model of Christian charity. Their “City on a Hill” became many such cities, and their systems of government and way of life became the basis for a great nation. 

The new borough may be but a small community, but great character is great achievement enough. The regeneration of liberty, even in a small area, is worth the striving. Perhaps a successful founding might one day produce sons and daughters who will spread out into Alaska and America as new apostles of freedom’s restoration. Perhaps a successful founding will inspire others in America to copy this one.

We cannot know. But we, like millions of fellow Americans, do know that something must be done, and since the people of Eagle River require a new constitution of government, they can do more. In any event, if we honor the character and deeds of our forebears, it is our duty to take substantial steps towards rebuilding a true home for freedom in our locality that rejects encroaching tyranny in our country and our world today, and to entrust the results to God. 

If we want to make the best effort we can to establish freedom anew in our small corner of the country, we must understand, especially in these times, so hostile to liberty, how freedom grew from a tender plant and thrived.

The Eaglexit Board would like to thank Forrest Nabors for his support and efforts. This is the first of a four-part series. Check back for Part II of this series this weekend. Please consider joining the cause and keeping up on our progress at Eaglexit.com. Our next public meeting is June 20 at 7pm at the Elks Lodge.

Jared Goecker: What I’ve learned by listening to voters in Chugiak-Eagle River

By JARED GOECKER

Having knocked on over 3,000 doors in Chugiak-Eagle River, I have some observations about the status of this race and why I believe I will win.

When I first announced my campaign to challenge Kelly Merrick for her seat, I wasn’t sure what to expect as far as response from the district. I’ve been involved in Republican campaigns and causes for all of my adult life, so I’m no stranger to fighting in the trenches, but it certainly felt different being the candidate myself.

Running for office is the ultimate job interview and I believe firmly that how I campaign is a direct reflection on how hard I will work once elected. I immediately started knocking on doors in February and experienced my first subzero door day canvassing — it’s not for the faint of heart! I’m wrapping up the entire district for the first time and am going to immediately start over and do it again. Here is what I learned from you, the voter. 

First, people are genuinely alarmed with how things are going in Alaska. I have been told by countless people that it feels like we’re in decline and instead of trying to reverse this trend, the Juneau elite seem content with selling out our state. Jobs and opportunities are shrinking, and with it go our kids and grandkids. One man teared up as he told me about his children all leaving Alaska for jobs in the Lower 48 and being torn between wanting to be closer to his kids or staying in a state he has lived in for over 40 years. 

Secondly, people are hurting financially. This is due in part to the devastating effects of Bidenomics and the crushing inflation spurred on by federal spending. Compounding the problem, however, is rising property taxes, a 75% tax on the PFD (thanks Kelly Merrick), and the threat of an income and sales tax to support even more government spending. Everyday Alaskans share the same sentiment, “Why can’t politicians live within a budget?” 

They don’t accept the lie from Juneau that there is nothing left to cut in government and therefore it’s impossible to keep its growth in check. And they certainly don’t support blowing up the size of government with a multi-billion-dollar public pension plan that Merrick is trying to push through the Legislature that only benefits her special interests and leaves Alaska workers out high and dry (to the tune of $9 billion over 10 years). 

Thirdly, people are scared about the rise in crime. This is something that I know all too well personally, having experienced losing my brother last year to senseless and avoidable violence. I hear heartbreaking stories about criminals who post reduced bail and skip town to never face justice while the victims are left to try and make sense of it all. Law enforcement officers tell me they arrest the same people over and over and yet nothing happens. This is unfortunately the norm thanks to our soft on crime politicians who are more focused on the criminal’s wellness than the victim’s. It’s unacceptable. 

There is so much more I could share, but the reception from the district has been overwhelmingly positive towards my message of being tough on crime, implementing a real spending cap, fiscal responsibility, economic innovation, and bringing accountability to politicians. Kelly Merrick is just another elitist politician who uses the voter for her personal gain, and it’s time someone held her accountable.  

People are furious that she ran as a Republican and then immediately joined the Democrat-dominated majority in Juneau. People are in disbelief that while we struggle to keep food on the table, she looks for multi-billion-dollar boondoggles to benefit special interests that will require an income tax to pay for and whatever is left of the PFD. She threw sand in the Governor’s face when he tried to bring about actual reform to improve student learning outcomes, preferring instead to keep doing the same old tired NEA sponsored method of throwing more money at a failing system. She blocked key conservative appointments to important boards and commissions.

The Merricks supported leftwing radical Suzanne LaFrance who will be ushering in increased property taxes and leftwing nonsense to our community. These are the grievances I have heard from you, and these are the same grievances that propelled me to get involved.

I am honored to have earned the endorsements and support from local leaders like former Lt. Gov. Craig Campbell, Rep. Jamie Allard, Assemblymen Scott Myers and Mark Littlefield, former Assemblywoman Amy Demboski, and numerous other conservative groups and organizations. I have the know-how to run a winning campaign. I have an organization that is built to sustain the inevitable barrage of special interests’ money and attacks that are coming for me. And most importantly, I have the passion and energy to fight back just as fiercely.  

We cannot keep sending people to Juneau who are untrustworthy, who betray our values, who empower radical leftists, and who are beholden to special interests. Professing Republican talking points while hiding behind the Democrat machine isn’t going to work anymore. It is time to send a real conservative to Juneau who will actually fight for our values. It’s time to send someone to Juneau who will fight the swamp – not become it. Go to jaredforalaska.com to chip in today to help me fight this battle. 

Jared Goecker is a Republican candidate for Senate Seat L, Chugiak-Eagle River.

Linda Boyle: Follow the money on the next ‘vaccine’

By LINDA BOYLE

“It is the love of money that has the potential to exterminate – to render extinct – the entire human race.” ~ Michael Rupert

Dr. Anthony Fauci, at a Feb 1, 2021 White House Covid briefing, said: “The best way to fight the new variants that are spreading is to get people vaccinated as quickly and expeditiously as possible throughout the country.” 

He concluded by saying that by vaccinating the entire population as soon as possible would “prevent the emergence of variants here in our country.”

Five or six more boosters since then and Covid-19 continues to mutate. Now there is a push for a yearly shot, much like the flu shot mentality.  

It seems, however, most Americans aren’t buying this “you must get this jab or you will die” propaganda anymore. Drug companies such as Moderna aren’t making big bucks any longer. In fact, the total revenue for Moderna in fourth quarter 2023 was $2.8 Billion—a decrease of $5.1 Billion from the same time frame in 2022.  This is a dramatic 43% decline.  

But have no fear — the government is gearing up to stop other diseases and preparing for the new diseases that are just around the corner. The government is also working on older diseases that need a makeover with modern vaccine technology. It plans to use your tax dollars to fund Big Pharma so the income stream can flow again. 

Moderna is ecstatic to report the first mRNA “vaccine” for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for folks over 60. 

It was approved even though it is only 78% effective against two of the RSV symptoms—cough and fever.  

This newly developed RSV vaccine still needs to get approved by a panel of “experts.” Moderna’s CEO has announced this approval will give the company a much-needed shot for new revenue. It’s revenue that will make up for the losses due to people not taking all those Covid-19 boosters.  

The new mRNA drug for RSV has the brand name of mRESVIA. The company says because it is made by an mRNA process, it has the potential to be more effective than any conventional shots. 

What does this approval mean financially for Moderna?  “Analysts on average forecast sales for Moderna’s RSV vaccine of $340 million in 2024, growing to $830.5 million the following year, according to LSEG data.” 

Moderna is also going to receive some more good news. The U.S. government is ready to make an agreement with the company that will fund a “late-stage trial” of Moderna’s mRNA bird flu vaccine.  

There is concern that the bird flu has been contracted by a grand total of three Americans, none of whom died.

This bird flu vaccine funding would be through the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) with an expectation of tens of millions of dollars to be funneled to Moderna for these trials. This deal may include a commitment by the government to buy these vaccines for the H5N1 Bird flu if the taxpayer-funded trials are successful.  

Not wanting to leave Pfizer out of this lucrative deal, the government is also in talks with Pfizer to develop mRNA vaccines to target the H5 family of bird flu viruses. The Financial Times stated the ability of these two companies to add to the U.S. pandemic stockpile would be a big boon for them; both companies’ shares fell as the demand waned for Covid-19 jabs.  

Pfizer announced it is ready to “deploy the company’s capabilities to develop a vaccine for strategic stockpiles.”

Despite the very low threat of bird flu, the World Health Organization is sounding the alarm, as is FDA Commissioner Robert Califf.  Califf has warned this potential bird flu pandemic could have a “mortality rate of up to 25%.”  The CDC, however, says it is still a low risk and if contracted by a person it can be easily treated. 

Other public health experts stated this prediction is a bit over the top and even “farcical.”  

 Still others ponder if this potential “fear-mongering” is related to profit possibilities.

It seems as if Big Pharma is gearing up and their eyes light up over the profits that could be made. 

The National Institutes of Heath is also interested.  Afterall, NIH scientists made $71 million in royalties from the last go-around.  About $690 million went to the subagency called the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases — the one Dr. Fauci used to run. Add to this the  $400 million of Covid royalties NIH got from Pfizer and Moderna. It is unclear if the $71 million is in addition or part of this $400 million settlement. NIH isn’t saying.  

Follow the money. Follow the greed. Sadly, many people in power are more concerned with that than they are with your wellbeing. 

Will we fall for this again? It’s hard to say. There are still those among us wearing the face mask—N-95 no less, and over their beards, or with their noses hanging out, virtue signaling to the rest of us.    

Linda Boyle, RN, MSN, DM, was formerly the chief nurse for the 3rd Medical Group, JBER, and was the interim director of the Alaska VA. Most recently, she served as Director for Central Alabama VA Healthcare System. She is the director of the Alaska Covid Alliance.

Sen. Forrest Dunbar said FDA approval of ecstasy drug was ‘imminent,’ but agency experts studying it voted overwhelmingly against approval

Sen. Forrest Dunbar may be convinced that psychedelics like MDMA (“Molly” or “ecstasy”) should be mainstreamed for psychiatric uses in Alaska, but a panel of experts advising the Food and Drug Administration is not so sure.

The FDA’s Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory Committee voted against approving the drug for the treatment of post traumatic stress disorder.

The vote, 10-1, showed that the experts feel that the drug made by Lykos Therapeutics is not safe, and its possible benefits don’t outweigh its risks. On a vote of 9-2, the committee also said that MDMA is not effective for treating PTSD, according to the research.

The committee’s recommendation means that the FDA probably won’t approve the use of the drug, which was to be used in combination with “talk therapy.” A decision on the Lykos Therapeutics application is expected this summer.

“I’m not convinced at all that this drug is effective based on the data I saw,” commented Rajesh Narendran, a psychiatry professor at the University of Pittsburgh who is the committee’s chairman.

Democrat Dunbar, of Anchorage, and Democrat Rep. Jennie Armstrong, also of Anchorage, filed legislation this year to set up a psychedelic medicine task force in anticipation of the drug being approved.

Dunbar told the Legislature in his sponsor statement that approval of MDMA was imminent and that research shows it is effective:

“The FDA is currently reviewing MDMA for treatment of PTSD, with approval expected by the end of this year. Additionally, advanced trials show that psilocybin and ibogaine are effective at treating PTSD, depression, anxiety, and TBI symptoms. Passing SB 166 is vital for Alaska to leverage these treatments in addressing mental health challenges. The task force represents a step towards pioneering mental health solutions. I urge your support for SB 166 to ensure that Alaska will be ready for the FDA’s imminent approval of psychedelic medicine,” Dunbar said in his sponsor statement.

Rep. Jamie Allard wrote on her Facebook page: “I voted NO on HB 228, Representative Armstrong and Senator Dunbars Psychedelic Drug Task Force Bill. I believe there are better ways to help our service men and women instead of us continuing to push for drug addiction or be used as guinea pigs. I will be requesting the Governor Mike Dunleavy VETO HB 228 setting up a task force, that’s clearly a waste of funds. We can and must do better in helping and supporting our fellow veterans. Seeing all the research prove that more drugs isn’t always the answer. I believe this bill was to use military members as a platform to legalize psychedelic drugs, in the state of Alaska and said so in my floor speech.”

The rise of the Fairbanks false-flag Republican

Voters in Fairbanks may not be aware that House candidate Joy Beth Cottle changed her voter registration just days before she officially filed to challenge Republican Rep. Frank Tomaszewski, who represents House District 34.

While she was registered as “undeclared,” she was suddenly a Republican as of the third week of May. But her record is hard-left Democrat.

Cottle submitted testimony to the Legislature begging lawmakers to restore the costly pension program for public employees — the same program that was eliminated due to it bankrupting Alaska back in 2006, when the Legislature switched employees over to a defined contribution program, a classic 401(k) retirement system like much of the rest of the workforce has. Restoring pensions would cost the rest of Alaskans’ Permanent Fund dividends, and then some. In fact, the state is still in debt for the now-retired pension plan, and will be for years to come.

Cottle’s main issue is wanting the pension plan restored. She is a union activist and enjoys a Tier III defined benefits pension member. In a letter to the Alaska Legislature in 2021, she said she divorced “a fantastic man” and blamed the stresses of her job as a firefighter and the fact that she and her ex-husband both worked too hard to take care of their marriage.

An employee of the Fairbanks Fire Department, Cottle also signed the petition for higher minimum wages in 2014, but surprisingly has not voted in a single primary election since 2015.

On her Facebook page, she wrote, “the Daily News Miner ran a story incorrectly identifying me as running (D). I filed as a Republican and I’m requesting a correction to the article. I’ll assume best intent unless proven otherwise.” But, in fact, it was the Fairbanks Daily News-Miner that pegged her correctly on its first draft, saying the quiet part out loud:

Screenshot

To avert Southcentral shortages, Alaska Gasline Development signs initial agreement with Pantheon

Enough gas for all of Alaska by 2029 and for decades to come? It may be on the way.

As Cook Inlet faces a reduction of natural gas to supply the Railbelt, an agreement has been signed that could get a gasline built from the North Slope to Southcentral Alaska, which would complete one of three major aspects of the Alaska LNG project.

Pantheon Resources, owner of 100% working interest in the Kodiak and Ahpun oil and gas fields on the North Slope, and the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation announced on Tuesday that Pantheon subsidiary Great Bear Pantheon LLC has signed a gas sales precedent agreement with 8 Star Alaska LLC, a subsidiary of AGDC.

The agreement prioritizes the pipeline to Southcentral, and it de-risks the entire project, which involves both a gas treatment plant on the North Slope, and a liquefaction facility at tidewater in Nikiski. The agreement that was signed may de-risk the entire project by getting the pipeline in place first, making the other investments less risky for investors.

Alaska LNG is a federally authorized natural gas and LNG export project under development for years to deliver natural gas within Alaska and export up to 20 million tons per year of liquified natural. But right now the biggest need is for Alaskan homes businesses, and institutions.

AGDC wants the in-state 42-inch pipeline from the North Slope to Southcentral Alaska to avert a looming energy crisis facing the region.

Phase 1 of Alaska LNG does not involve construction of an LNG plant, and as a result has a much lower capital requirement and construction timeframe, allowing gas transportation as early as 2029, said AGDC, which is also in talks with a pipeline developer.

AGDC aims to undertake front-end engineering and design ahead of a final investment decision planned for the middle of 2025.

“This agreement solidifies the commercial foundation needed for the Phase 1 portion of Alaska LNG and provides enough pipeline-ready natural gas, at beneficial consumer rates, to resolve Southcentral Alaska’s looming energy shortage as soon as 2029,” said Frank Richards, AGDC President.

“Phasing Alaska LNG by leading with the construction of the pipeline will make Alaska LNG’s export components more attractive to LNG developers and investors, and this agreement will help unlock the project’s substantial economic, environmental, and energy security benefits for international markets as well as for Alaska. Today’s announcement represents the culmination of the committed work of Pantheon and AGDC leaders and enhances the prospects of Alaska LNG in a way that benefits both the State of Alaska and Pantheon,” he said.

“We are delighted to have the opportunity to create a win-win for the State of Alaska and for Pantheon as we turn the fantastic exploration & appraisal success of the past five years into the development of two giant oil and gas fields on Alaska’s North Slope.  We are building a mutually beneficial long-term relationship with Alaska LNG and with the State which seeks to supply much needed gas required for Southcentral Alaska’s energy needs, while at the same time realising the value from our contingent resources exceeding 1.5 billion barrels of ANS blend and 6 Tcf of natural gas,” said David Hobbs, Pantheon Executive chairman.

“When we set out our strategy to achieve early production and cashflow on the path to financial self-sufficiency, we considered gas monetisation as a path to non-dilutive funding only one of several possibilities,” Hobbs said in a prepared statement. “However, the availability of our pipeline-quality associated gas created the opportunity to bolster the Alaska LNG project, including the pipeline, LNG export facilities and gas conditioning facilities. We are happy to be able to share the benefit, thereby enhancing both Pantheon’s and AGDC’s project economics and funding profiles. Our goal of demonstrating sustainable market recognition of $5-$10 per barrel of 1C/1P marketable liquids by end 2028 remains unchanged.” 

Under the agreement, both parties agree to negotiate in good faith based on the agreed commercial terms. The final agreement will be conditioned on: AGDC and Pantheon making affirmative investment decisions for their respective projects; and required permits and regulatory approvals obtained for receiving gas from Pantheon’s fields into the Alaska LNG Project.