Wednesday, May 13, 2026
Home Blog Page 391

Cherry pick: White House adds controversial Interior communication director to its comms team

Just last year Tyler Cherry was named communication director for the Department of Interior. But he has just been promoted to associate communications director for the Biden-Harris White House.

Cherry has the usual resume for a Democrat communications director: He was director of rapid response (Twitter warrior) for the Biden-Harris Arizona coordinated campaign in 2020. Before joining the Biden campaign, Cherry was director of public affairs at a Democrat political consulting firm, where he executed strategic communications plans for political campaigns.

He previously worked at the ultra-left Media Matters for America as a campaign associate and researcher. He graduated from UCLA with degree in political science and minors in civic engagement and gender studies.

Cherry lives in Washington, D.C. “with his partner and two exuberant cats,” his biographical description reads at the Department of Interior.

But beyond that, he brings a lot more to the White House in the way of extremist views:

He identifies as nonbinary, while most records at the government refer to him as male.

He has called for defunding police.

“Praying for #Baltimore, but praying even harder for an end to a capitalistic police state motivated by explicit and implicit racial biases,” Cherry wrote in 2015 during race riots.

He compared police to slave patrols.

“Apt time to recall that the modern day police system is a direct evolution of slave patrols and lynch mobs,” he wrote later.

He supports the radical and lawless Black Lives Matter organization.

He opposes Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE.)

He refers to Hamas extremists as “resistance.”

He opposes Israel.

Cherry is part of a “queer DJ collective” that pushes LGBTQ politics in DC nightclubs.

The pick of Cherry is curious due to the high profile of the White House and its activities during an election year, particularly one in which President Biden is losing in the polls, and is exhibiting signs of senility.

Rep. Mary Peltola has disputed that characterization of senility, saying Biden is one of the sharpest people she has met in D.C.

Read the story about his radical history at FoxNews.com

Dave Bronson: Sales tax – relief or burden for Anchorage?

By MAYOR DAVE BRONSON

For decades, Anchorage residents and local government have discussed the idea of a sales tax to alleviate property taxes. As the cost of living has escalated and property taxes have continued to rise, I have publicly supported a sales tax—but only if it provided dollar-for-dollar relief of property taxes. The most recent sales tax proposal, Project Anchorage, does not aim to do that. Instead, two-thirds of the sales tax revenue would alleviate the property tax burden, while one-third would fund special projects. 

At a high level, Project Anchorage seems like a reasonable compromise. The tax is designed to partially relieve property owners and fund new projects. However, this could easily turn into another tax pipeline that increases municipal government spending, much like the alcohol tax has.

During the budget process in 2023, the Anchorage Assembly moved the funding for the Mobile Intervention Team and Mobile Crisis Team from the alcohol tax to the general operations budget. They then used the freed-up alcohol tax funds to finance new programs. This ultimately increased the city budget, placing a greater burden on property taxpayers.

While lowering property taxes would certainly benefit homeowners and potentially make Anchorage more attractive for new residents and businesses, the regressive nature of sales taxes means they disproportionately impact lower-income families. This raises concerns about fairness and equity. Moreover, there is the question of how effectively the additional funds for community projects will be managed. Will these projects truly enhance our quality of life, or will they become yet another way to inflate municipal budgets?

I have seen firsthand the challenges our community faces with high property taxes that make first time homeownership a challenge. While a sales tax is not ideal, its potential benefits in terms of housing affordability and community enhancement make it a worthy consideration. However, the Project Anchorage approach does not relieve property taxes, so I remain skeptical. 

Ultimately, Project Anchorage presents a vision for our city that requires careful scrutiny. I encourage everyone to look closely at the details, weigh the pros and cons, and participate in the upcoming discussions. Our collective voice and decision will shape the future of Anchorage.

Dave Bronson is mayor of Anchorage.

Scientific American calls for federal regulation of homeschool families

A leading magazine devoted to science journalism says American homeschoolers are being left behind and that their parents should be investigated and have to pass a background check in order to educate their own children at home.

Scientific American, in its May issue, says “With few states tracking who is being homeschooled and what they are learning, an untold number of U.S. children are at risk of a poor education or even abuse.”

The magazine shows alarm that parents are pulling their children out of government schools at an increasing rate. It says that in 2019, nearly 3% of U.S. children — 1.5 million — were being homeschooled.

“No one knows by how much, and that is part of the problem. Home­school­ing is barely tracked or regulated in the U.S. But children deserve a safe and robust education, whether they attend a traditional school or are educated at home,” the magazine argues.

“This number, calculated from a nationwide survey, is surely an undercount because the home­schooling population is notoriously hard to survey, and more children have been home­schooled since the COVID pandemic began. Eleven states do not require parents to inform anyone that they are home­schooling a child, and in most of the country, once a child has exited the traditional schoolroom environment, no one checks to ensure they are receiving an education at all,” Scientific American says.

Alaska has the highest percentage of homeschool students in the nation, with over 15.4% of families homeschooling their children. Alaska is followed by Idaho at 8.9%, Tennessee at 8.5%, and Oklahoma at 8.3%.

The magazine wants government oversight on homeschool families, just in case children are being abused. However, the magazine offers no evidence to support such an overreach by the federal government into families’ lives. Nor does the magazine address the constitutionality of such an action; the Department of Education is a relatively new federal agency, created during the Carter Administration and a growing number of conservatives believe the department should be dismantled due to the quality of public education having declined ever since the department was created and because it is skimming money that could be used for schools.

Scientific American argues that homeschool students aren’t required to take assessments that students who attend government schools take.

“This makes sense, since the individualized learning environment afforded to homeschool students lends itself to more flexible and diverse assessment modalities. While standardized tests might be the most efficient way for teachers to measure the content knowledge of a class of 25 students, a written analysis based on a recent visit to a museum might be a more meaningful demonstration of knowledge for a homeschool student,” says the Mackinac Center for Public Policy.

View Alaska’s homeschool subject proficiency data here.

“What doesn’t make sense, however, is the editors’ argument that the practice of exempting homeschool students from taking the same types of assessments as their peers in a classroom setting ‘enables educational neglect that can have long-lasting consequences for a child’s development.’ This is an unscientific logical fallacy with harmful consequences, including misleading the public about the reality of homeschooling. While neglecting a child’s education is certain to have a negative impact on his or her development, exempting a homeschool child from taking standardized assessments is not a form of educational neglect,” the policy group writes, in a pointed critique of the magazine.

Scientific American also smeared Christians in its opinion column, saying that “some Christian home­school­ing curricula teach Young Earth Creationism instead of evolution. Other curricula describe slavery as ‘Black immigration’ or extol the virtues of Nazism.”

While it’s true that homeschool learning can be tailored and individualized to reflect a family’s deeply held values, one main reason that more families are choosing it as an option for their children is because during the Covid pandemic, while students were learning at home, parents became concerned about the concepts their children were being taught, especially when those things were in conflict with family values, such as non-scientific gender identity ideology and anti-Christian dogma.

The science magazine, which has been published for 178 years, prescribes federal intervention and monitoring of homeschool families:

“It is clear that home­school­ing will continue to lack accountability for outcomes or even basic safety in most states. But federal mandates for reporting and assessment to protect children don’t need to be onerous. For example, home­school parents could be required to pass an initial background check, as every state requires for all K–12 teachers. Home­school instructors could be required to submit documents every year to their local school district or to a state agency to show that their children are learning.”

Take this survey from an Anchorage Assembly that can’t take a message from public on Portland Loos

The Anchorage Assembly has launched an online survey, open until July 12, to find out what the public thinks about the need for more public restrooms in Anchorage.

In April, the public soundly defeated the Assembly’s bond proposal to install a series of Portland Loo public restrooms around Anchorage.

Prop. 8, for $5 million in taxpayer funds, would have put up to 10 modular toilet facilities around town. The voters said $500,000 toilets were too much. Voters appear to be concerned that the toilets will be taken over by vagrants and drug abusers, as so many other public facilities have been.

But this is an Assembly that won’t take “no” for an answer.

“We want to learn more why the bond did not pass. Did the bond ask for too much money, did it not provide enough information, or are restrooms simply not a desired amenity in public spaces?” the Assembly asks on its survey website at this link.

The website set up to push the survey gives all kinds of reasons that more public restrooms are needed, including “mental well-being.”

The survey website says people benefit from clean restrooms, stating “Parents of young children can leave home knowing they’ll be able to find a clean bathroom before a request becomes an emergency.”

On the same page, however, the survey website admits that businesses endure costs for “repairing damage from misuse” of their toilets, without acknowledging the same problem will plague unattended public toilets at even greater frequency.

Among the questions on the survey is this: What is your gender identity?

The choices provided by the survey are:

  • – Woman
  • – Man
  • – Gender queer or non-binary
  • – Agender
  • – Not specified above, please specify

In a study conducted in 2019 with cities that installed Portland Loos, some of serious problems with these facilities were described. These problems, including needle use, prostitution, and general illegal activity, are not included as information the public might want as it visits the Anchorage Assembly’s public survey. The problems include these Portland Loo stories from other cities:

In 2014 the Salt Lake City government, at the behest of members of the Salt Lake City community concerned about health conditions and lack of services in a dilapidated industrial area of the city, installed two Portland Loos. The Loos are close to a homeless shelter, a soup kitchen, and a health clinic for people experiencing homelessness. While there are plans to build multi-use facilities, there are at present no residential areas nearby and very few businesses. No sooner were the Loos installed than drug dealers took them over, prohibiting entry to anyone not willing to buy drugs. The Loos also began to be used for prostitution. Toilets were constantly clogged with inappropriate items being flushed down. People were sleeping in the Loos. In 2018 the Utah Highway Patrol ordered that the Portland Loos be shut at night. There is now a full time monitor during the day assigned to clean the Loos as needed and limit use to one person at a time. Since then conditions have improved.

In 2017 Olympia Washington, responding to a call from the community for a restroom for the public, especially people experiencing homelessness, installed a Portland Loo open 24/7 along a sidewalk downtown with heavy foot traffic, and taverns and restaurants, specialty stores, and City Hall nearby. Concurrent with its being installed an adjacent parking lot was converted into a park which was eventually closed down. Before being closed down, the Loo became a congregating area for people using the park (homeless individuals, drug users) to the detriment of the use of the Loo. Since the park was closed down, the situation has improved significantly. There are reports of occasional use for shooting up and people sleeping in them at night.

Peninsula Clarion cuts print to one day per week

The final Wednesday edition of Kenai’s Peninsula Clarion will be printed and delivered on Wednesday, June 26, after the parent company, Alabama-based Carpenter Media, decided to trim from two days a week to just one. The newspaper, as so many are, is slowly become an online publication.

“We will publish our last Saturday paper July 6 and deliver readers a weekly paper every Friday following,” the newspaper announced Friday.

One year ago, the Peninsula Clarion and Juneau Empire went from five days week down to two days for their print editions, and, along with Homer News, took the printing work to a firm outside the state.

At the same time, Carpenter Media Group, which acquired Sound Publishing earlier this year, announced it is laying off 62 people in the Northwest, including half of the unionized employees at the Everett Herald. Carpenter owns more than 40 newspapers in Washington and about 200 publications altogether.

Neither the Homer News nor the Juneau Empire have announced similar moves to reducing the print edition. The Empire prints twice a week and Homer prints once.

Passing: Susan Stone, longtime teacher, civic volunteer in Ketchikan, active in Republican circles

A well-known Republican and civic activist in Ketchikan has passed.

Susan Stone, who was for a several years the president of the Ketchikan District Republicans, died on Saturday after a long battle with cancer.

She will not be forgotten: The first order of business at the Republican State Central Committee quarterly meeting in the Mat-Su Valley on Saturday was a solemn resolution honoring her service.

Stone was a longtime and well-regarded teacher in Ketchikan. Just this week, the Ketchikan Chamber of Commerce named her the Grand Marshal for this year’s Fourth of July parade. The chamber wrote about her in its announcement:

“Susan Stone will lead the procession, symbolizing unity, celebration, and the vibrant spirit of Ketchikan,” the chamber wrote, although the group was certainly aware that Stone was on her deathbed and would not likely make it to July 4, much less to the parade.

“We are delighted to have Susan Stone as our Grand Marshal for this year’s Fourth of July Parade,” wrote Trevor Shaw, president of the Greater Ketchikan Chamber of Commerce and a close friend of Stone’s. “Her dedication to the community aligns perfectly with the theme of our event. After decades of influencing our youth and community, we are proud to salute her.”

Stone recently retired after teaching in the Ketchikan school district for 27 years, primarily teaching U.S. history, civics, and American government. She was the commencement speaker for the Class of 2024.

“Through her teaching she has worked to instill pride and love for this great country in all her students. She has strived to not only teach them key facts, dates, and milestones, but also to help history come to life and help them become good citizens as they come of age. She has done this by not just teaching them the Bill of Rights and significant Supreme Court cases, but by bringing their government to them,” the Chamber wrote.

“She developed a mock trial program that included a field trip to the courthouse for every senior class for over a decade. She spearheaded the police ride-along program for American Government students. She connected the students to their legislators, including Rep. Don Young, U.S. Senators Stevens, Murkowski, and Sullivan, Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell, and many other local officials. When her senior students turn 18 she assists them in getting registered to vote. She works to help them see that the government is accessible and that each of them can make a difference. For nearly three decades she has brought our history and government to life for her students in real and practical ways,” the Chamber continued.

Stone even built a World War I-style trench through the middle of her classroom.

Stone took time off from teaching to raise a family, and during that time was a Girl Scout leader, and Girl Scout Council president. Through her work with the Girl Scouts, she empowered young women to be active, engaged citizens from a very young age. She volunteered in many other youth activities, church activities, and community activities of all sorts.

“If you ask her why she did all these things she would say that it was to keep our community going and make it a better place for her daughters and all of the kids in it. Her energy has always been focused on modeling behavior for the generations to come, to help mold active, engaged citizens,” the Chamber said.

Stone’s students have gone on to serve in local elected office; to be doctors, attorneys, businesspeople, teachers, caregivers. Look around this community, and beyond, “and you will find Mrs. Stone’s former students active and engaged in making their communities better, just as she has worked to do for so many decades. She has poured her heart and soul into her teaching each and every day of her career, including many late nights, weekends, and summers. And for the past few years she has done all of that while fighting a mighty battle against cancer. On top of teaching them to be good citizens, she has taught her students something about what it means to be a warrior, too.”

“Literally thousands of Ketchikan’s graduates know what it means to salute and respect our country because of what they learned in Mrs. Stone’s classroom. What better way to recognize this year’s theme of ‘Ketchikan, We Salute You’ than to honor a member of our community who has fostered a love and honor for our community and our country in generations of young people,” the Chamber wrote.

She was born Susan Bullock and lived in Kodiak as a nine-year-old girl with her parents Evelyn and the Rev. Don Bullock when the 1964 earthquake hit. Stone is the mother of Stacey Stone, who has served as legal counsel for the Alaska Republican Party for many years, and two other grown children.

Judge upholds historic fines against signature-gathering group opposing ranked choice voting

Anchorage Superior Court Judge Laura Hartz, appointed by Gov. Mike Dunleavy, has allowed to stand the campaign violation fines levied in January by the Alaska Public Offices Commission against the group challenging Alaska’s ranked choice voting system.

The repeal of ranked choice voting will be on November’s general election ballot.

The Alaskans for Honest Elections was successful in getting enough signatures to get the question on the ballot in November, giving Alaska voters another chance to consider whether they want to use ranked choice voting and nonpartisan primaries as their method to elect people to state and federal offices. But their handling of their campaign finances was lacking and exposed them to a complaint with Alaska Public Offices Commission.

The dark-money group Alaskans for Better Elections, which created the final-four primary and ranked choice voting general, had originally filed that complaint, saying that Alaskans for Honest Elections, Phil Izon, Art Mathias, and Wellsprings Fellowship violated campaign finance laws by not accurately reporting the pathway of a major donation to the group’s signature-gathering effort.

After the complaint was filed, APOC reviewed the facts and issued one of the largest penalties in APOC memory: $94,610.20.

The fine can be compared to a 2021 fine that APOC levied against the campaign of Mayor Dave Bronson, who was fined $38,500 by the regulatory agency.

In 2020, APOC fined Rep. Lance Pruitt over $1 million, but then reduced it by 99% and ultimately fined him $10,222.

In 2014, Rep. Chris Tuck was fined $14,000 for campaign reporting errors.

But for Alaskans for Honest Elections, which wants to repeal 2020’s Ballot Measure 2, APOC determined that the full court press was appropriate. Mathias contributed $90,000 to the Ranked Choice Education Association, which then gave the money to Alaskans for Honest Elections. The source of the original funds was not clear to the public.

Judge Hartz wrote, “There is no constitutional right to make anonymous contributions for the purpose of influencing the outcome of an election. There is likewise no right to contribute through an intermediary or in the name of another, and the court declines to create such a right.”

Hartz also wrote that the Alaskans for Honest Elections claim that “true source reporting does not apply to ballot initiatives misreads the admittedly confusing but ultimately plain language of .065(c) and ignores the broader statutory framework referenced in the statute. Appellants’ reading of the statute renders meaningless multiple subsections of AS 15.13.040 and 2 AAC 50.352 in full. Courts ‘generally disfavor statutory constructions that reach absurd results.'”

The judged concluded that Alaska’s true source reporting statute and related provisions are narrowly tailored to the government’s “substantial interest” in having an informed electorate by making publicly available to voters the true source of election funds.

“Courts have recognized that knowing the sources of election spending ultimately informs voters’ decisions, prevents groups from ‘hiding behind dubious and misleading names’ and likewise prevents individuals from hiding in anonymity. The Alaska Supreme Court has likewise held that ‘[w]hen citizens vote on the basis of misinformation, or a lack of relevant information, the decision-making process on which our government ultimately rests suffers.'”

Alaskans for Better Elections asked the judge to impose triple damages on Alaskans for Honest Elections, but was denied.

The full judgment can be read here:


Now there are three: Kenai Republican women endorse Nick Begich for Congress

Three clubs in three days. The Kenai Peninsula Republican Women have passed a resolution similar to one passed by the Republican Women of Fairbanks and the Valley Republican Women of Alaska, giving their full endorsement to both Donald Trump for president and Nick Begich for Congress. The group held a fundraiser for Nick Begich in the fall, and their support hasn’t wavered.

The resolutions from the women’s clubs are a direct response to the endorsement made by Trump for Nancy Dahlstrom, who filled to run for Congress in November, a half a year after Begich was already in the race. Both are Republicans.

The Kenai resolution is as follows:

WHEREAS, the trust and confidence of the citizens in their elected representatives are paramount to a functioning and healthy republic; and

WHEREAS, every congressional candidate has a duty to maintain the highest standards of integrity, transparency, and accountability in all pursuits; and

WHEREAS, responsiveness, accessibility and concerns of the citizens are actively engaged and heeded through representation of their voices at the grass roots level ensuring actions reflect the values and best interest of the constituents they serve; and

WHEREAS, Kenai Peninsula Republican Women (KPRW) completely recognizes and supports President Donald J. Trump for the 2024 Presidential election. We are a party rooted in grassroots activism, deriving support from the dedicated Republican base, the very heart of our party, and

WHEREAS, considering the party’s commitment to unity as a cornerstone of our success, we strongly believe in leading by example, for the benefit of our members.

WHEREAS, candidate Nick Begich has passionately campaigned, reaching out to all areas and demographics of Alaskan voters since July 2023, lead by prayer and support by many grassroots republicans exhibiting and placing America First Values and Make America Great Again solutions for Alaska’s future; and

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: In pursuit of respect and dignity, Nick Begich has run a positive, solutions-oriented campaign focused on the future of our State, advancing a cohesive and thriving Alaska.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: Kenai Peninsula Republican Women, established in 2001, stands with Nick Begich for Alaska in his bid for U.S. Congress. We wholeheartedly endorse and support Nick, while praying for our nation’s unity, which we advocate. Nick Begich is the ideal choice for Alaska at this critical juncture.

Sen. Joni Ernst takes on Eco Health Alliance — again

By LINDA BOYLE

Readers may remember Rep. Dr. Rich McCormick, the Georgia Republican who served on the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, when he stated “EcoHealth [Alliance] violated the terms of its NIH grant when it failed to produce laboratory notebooks with data about the WIV’s gain-of-function research.”  

And who was the person behind all that gain-of-function research?  That was Dr. Peter Daszak through National Institute of Health funding that was authorized by none other than Dr. Anthony Fauci, the former director of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and one of the core creators of Covid-19 policies in the Trump and Biden Administrations.

Here were the key takeaways from the hearing with Dr. Fauci, according to the House Oversight Committee’s own summary:

  • Dr. Fauci showed no remorse for the millions of lives affected by his divisive rhetoric and his unscientific policies. He did not apologize to the thousands of Americans who lost their jobs because they refused the novel vaccine, nor did he apologize to children experiencing severe leaning loss as a result of actions he promoted.
  • Dr. Fauci confirmed that his Senior Advisor — Dr. David Morens — violated official NIH policies and potentially broke federal law. Evidence obtained by the Select Subcommittee suggests that Dr. Morens deliberately obstructed the Select Subcommittee’s investigation into the origins of COVID-19, unlawfully deleted federal COVID-19 records, and shared nonpublic information about National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant processes with his “best-friend” EcoHealth Alliance, Inc. (EcoHealth) President Dr. Peter Daszak.
  • Dr. Fauci maintained his misleading claim that the NIH never funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. In 2021, he told Sen. Rand Paul that “the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” During yesterday’s hearing, Dr. Fauci doubled down on his previous claim by stating “the NIH did not fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” Notably, former Acting NIH Director Dr. Lawrence Tabak told the Select Subcommittee recently that the NIH did, in fact, fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan.
  • Dr. Fauci agreed with the Select Subcommittee that EcoHealth and its president, Dr. Peter Daszak, should never again receive a single cent from the U.S. taxpayer. Two weeks after the Select Subcommittee released evidence of EcoHealth’s contempt for the American people, its flagrant disregard for the risks associated with gain-of-function research, and its willful violation of the terms of its NIH grant, the Department of Health and Human Services commenced formal debarment proceedings against the organization and its president.
  • Dr. Fauci corrected his previous testimony that his staff did not possess conflicts of interest. During his transcribed interview he claimed, “the only people that I am involved with is my own staff, who we’ve mentioned many times in this discussion, who don’t have a conflict of interest.” During yesterday’s hearing, he changed his tune testifying that Dr. Morens “definitely had a conflict of interest.”
  • Dr. Fauci publicly acknowledged that the lab leak hypothesis was possible and not a conspiracy theory. Yesterday, he told Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) that he falsely claimed that he has kept an “open mind” about the origins of the pandemic. This comes nearly four years after prompting the publication of the now infamous “Proximal Origin” paper that attempted to vilify and disprove the lab leak hypothesis.

Somebody in Congress was evidently listening when the testimony to the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic occurred.   

Sen. Joni Ernst, a Republican from Iowa, was listening. The Senate Armed Services Committee has unanimously passed her amendment to the 2025 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) “to close all potential pathways for EcoHealth Alliance to receive further federal defense funding.”  

Ernst added this to the National Defense Authorization Act after National Institutes of Health Principal Deputy Director Lawrence Tabak half-admitted that EcoHealth Alliance did indeed conduct gain-of-function research with our money, but it was “generic.”  

Dr. Bryce Nickels, a professor of genetics at Rutgers University and co-founder of the pandemic oversight group “Biosafety Now,” told the Washington Post, “Tabak was engaging in the usual obfuscation and semantic manipulation that is so frustrating and pointless.”

These experiments at Wuhan Virology Institute produced much more infectious variants than what could occur naturally if bats had transmitted the Covid-19 virus, some virologists say. 

The Senate Armed Services Committee unanimously passed Sen. Ernst’s amendment. That speaks volumes.  

While the Department of Health and Human Services in May suspended federal funding to EcoHealth Alliance and started debarment proceedings that would ban this group and Dr. Daszak from receiving funding for three years, Ernst’s amendment takes the ban a step further: If passed, it will not only ban EcoHealth Alliance but any subsidiary of the disgraced group from future defense funding.

“Defense dollars should be spent protecting our country, not paying for more of EcoHealth’s batty experiments,” Ernst told the Washington Free Beacon. “This shady organization has managed to avoid accountability time and time again. My amendment slams the door shut on any possibility for deep state bureaucrats to find another roundabout way to restore funding for the group’s risky research.”

If this Senate NDAA ban is successful, EcoHealth Alliance’s bottom line could be severely affected. EcoHealth Alliance heavily depends on federal funds, receiving more than $94 million in taxpayer dollars since 2008. This same group gave $600,000 of that funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for experiments on viruses that looked a lot like the ones that caused Covid-19. 

Before I get too excited and do a victory lap, I am aware of EcoHealth Alliance’s ability to weasel out of federal funding bans.  President Donald Trump suspended the group’s research funds in 2020. President Joe Biden reversed that funding ban in 2023, but suddenly banned them again in May. EcoHealth Alliance is working its K Street magic to get off the ‘banned” list. 

Senator Ernst tried a similar resolution in an 2024 version of the NDAA bill that made it through both the House and the Senate. But it didn’t make it into the final version—it was a last minute decision behind closed doors to remove it. 

It’s unknown if this 2025 amendment will meet the same demise. Yet I am hopeful.After Tabak testified, Congress and President Biden seem unified in their opposition.   

We are one step closer to solving the issues surrounding Covid and how it came to be a disease created that killed over 6 million people worldwide, including one million Americans. But there is much more work that needs to be done. There are bureaucrats who need to be held accountable for the harm done.  

And time will tell if America has the political will to hold all accountable for this horrible travesty.

Linda Boyle, RN, MSN, DM, was formerly the chief nurse for the 3rd Medical Group, JBER, and was the interim director of the Alaska VA. Most recently, she served as Director for Central Alabama VA Healthcare System. She is the director of the Alaska Covid Alliance.