Sunday, May 3, 2026
Home Blog Page 1044

Rep. David Eastman: I was chief-of-police of the American military base in downtown Kabul. This is what I saw

26

By DAVID EASTMAN

On my first flight to Afghanistan I came by way of Kyrgyzstan. By chance, we were on site the day the Government of Kyrgyzstan fell during the Tulip Revolution. Fortunately, the revolution was largely peaceful. My first visit to Kabul itself was on April 10, 2005. The American and NATO military presence in Afghanistan was high, and it was a relatively peaceful time to be in and around Kabul. It was the best of times.

Yes, there were bombings. One morning a vegetable cart blew up in front of a local high school. Another morning a bomb-laden bicycle blew up a taxicab. There were suicide attacks. There were IEDโ€™s. My brother would later survive four of them. Shortly after arriving in country, we experienced our first of many rocket attacks. One of the soldiers in my unit lost his leg responding to that first attack.

Five months into the deployment one of my classmates from West Point was killed. Less than two weeks later, my second classmate was killed. This was Afghanistan in the good times.

On one mission, my soldiers were directed to a firefight only to discover that it was a family, rather than a military, battle. An uncle, and his men, had come up against his nephew, and his men. The uncle prevailed. The nephew and all of his men were slaughtered.

We hear stories of the wild, wild west. The stories Iโ€™ve heard donโ€™t hold a candle to Afghanistan.

In Afghanistan, we were shown what appeared to be desert, and told how it had once been a fertile valleyโ€ฆuntil Genghis Khan had sacked it in the 13th century. No joke.

Police in Afghanistan were as much a problem as they were a solution. Stories were frequent about local police setting up unofficial checkpoints to shake down anyone passing by.

Police checkpoints were setup on the highway into Kabul. Officially, the purpose was to stop illegal drug shipments into Kabul. American soldiers were tasked with providing security for the policemen manning the checkpoints. But the checkpoints werenโ€™t setup to stop drug shipments. How do I know? Because after completing one such mission, I received a complaint from the Afghan government in Kabul. On that particular night, someone in the government had failed to inform the local drug cartel about the checkpoint. The checkpoint had caused the convoy with the drugs to have to turn around, and the cartel had reached out to the Afghan government very upset about it! The Afghan government immediately called us to complain that โ€œwe were in the wrong placeโ€. We werenโ€™t.

On one occasion, a group of Kabul police officers grabbed a teen off the street in full view of one of my soldiers on base, and began to gang rape the teen. American soldiers rescued the teen from the attack and took those responsible into custody. The supervisor of the police officers contacted Washington, D.C. to file a complaint against me.ย Kabul is that kind of place.

Read: New York Times: U.S. Soldiers told to ignore sexual abuse of boys by Afghan allies

Afghanistan is todayโ€™s wild, wild west. Those who live there are allowed to have an AK-47 at home for personal protection. Maybe the events above can help explain why. Afghanistan is that kind of place.

That is, they were permitted an AK-47 until today. Today is August 31st. The deadline for U.S. troops to withdraw has now arrived. All firearms and ammunitionย are now outlawed, and those in Afghanistan have less than a week to turn over any ammunition or firearms they have to the Taliban. Only the Taliban may have weapons. According to the Taliban, citizensย no longer need such protection.

As the provost marshal and senior law enforcement official for Camp Eggers, this is what I saw.

There were two places on base for soldiers to spend money; the coffee shop and the one-room department store (PX). In my first few months on the job, the manager of the coffee shop was fired and sent back to the states for embezzlement. So was the manager of the one-room department store.

This was the Afghanistan that we saw.

We have now added tens of billions of dollars of weapons and equipment to this war-torn land.

We have abandoned hundreds, if not thousands, of American citizens to the mercy of our avowed enemies.

Today, our allies in Afghanistan are being hunted down using weapons and technology provided by the American military and American taxpayers. In the future, it will become clear how many terrorists were brought to our shores on military flights out of Afghanistan. We do know that American lives were lost on Thursday. We know that American lives will be lost in the future as a consequence of what was permitted to take place over the past 18 days. What we do not yet know is how many lives.

From where I sit, John Harrington was certainly onto something four centuries ago:

โ€œTreason doth never prosper, whatโ€™s the reason? For if it prosper, none dare call it Treason.โ€ โ€“ John Harrington

David Eastman is the representative for District 10, Wasilla/Talkeetna. His website is www.davideastman.org.

Assembly overrides mayor’s first veto

As expected, the Anchorage Assembly on Tuesday voted to override Mayor Dave Bronson’s first veto of his term in office. The veto and subsequent override came as Bronson reached the end of his first 60 days in office as the city’s chief executive.

The Assembly’s liberal majority had voted to establish a homelessness board made up of homeless people or those who had been homeless. The mayor reasoned that boards require staff, and staff is expensive; there are already many groups doing work to alleviate homelessness in Anchorage. He didn’t see how another board would help.

The Assembly set up a special meeting in order to override the veto, which they did 9-1, with Chugiak/Eagle River Assemblywoman Jamie Allard casting the vote against the override. Crystal Kennedy, the other conservative on the Assembly, was not at the meeting.

The mayor has the authority to appoint members to the advisory board. It’s also clear that he has the ability to simply ignore the appointments to the board. It might take some time to find qualified people, according to one source close to the matter.

House narrowly defeats Rep. Eastman’s effort to end vaccine discrimination in employment in Alaska

The House voted down an amendment to House Bill 3003 offered by Rep. David Eastman that would have inserted intent language that would prohibit agencies receiving state funds from requiring its employees to show proof of having a Covid-19 vaccine as a condition of employment.

Opponents of the measure said that hospitals and clinics need to be able to ask their employees to be vaccinated. Proponents argued for the right to privacy and confidentiality.

The measure was voted down almost along party lines, with Republicans Sara Rasmussen and Kelly Merrick joining the Democrat caucus to vote against it, making it fail by 21-19.

The Alaska State Hospital and Nursing Home Association weighed in, causing a second vote on the amendment, which had initially passed. ASHNA begged lawmakers to oppose it.

Similar measures are passing in other states. In May, Montana Gov. Greg Gianforte signed Montana House Bill 702, which made the state the first to recognize an individual’s vaccination status as a protected category. The law prevents employers from requiring employees to disclose their immunization status and bars employers from requiring employees to receive certain types of vaccines or to possess an immunity passport. The law is part of the Montana Human Rights Act in Title 49, chapter 2, part 3 of the Montana Code Annotated. It is explained more fully by the Montana Department of Labor and Industry.

In Colorado, a House bill that would have banned discrimination against clients, patrons, or customers based on their Covid-19 vaccination status,ย failed to pass.

In Alaska, Gov. Mike Dunleavy issued issued anย administrative orderย that specifies the state’s “Executive Branch does not, and will not, require any person to produce their personal vaccine history, also referred to as a ‘vaccine Passport,’ in order to travel to, or around,ย Alaska.” The order, however, said the state would not “infringe on the rights of private businesses” and that the Alaska Marine Highway ferry system is still “allowed to inform passengers on long haul trips of the voluntary choice the passenger can make to provide proof of vaccination and avoid the need for a negative test before boarding.”

Sullivan demands answers from Biden on why 200 Americans are ‘forsaken’ by him

Sen. Dan Sullivan, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, sent aย letterย to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and National Security Advisor Jake Sullivanย demanding answers on why the Biden administrationย chose the seemingly arbitrary date of Aug. 31ย toย withdrawย all U.S. military forces from Afghanistan, even though American citizens remainย trappedย in the Taliban-controlled country.

The full text ofย the letter:

Dear Secretary Austin, Secretary Blinken, and Mr. Sullivan,

During a televised press conference on August 20, 2021, President Biden looked the American people in the eye and told them: โ€œLet me be clear. Any American who wants to come home, we will get you home.โ€ Almost immediately, senior Administration officials, including Secretary Blinken, tried to walk back President Bidenโ€™s pledge, both in public comments and in private briefs with members of Congress. Today, as the last U.S. military aircraft departed Kabul, Secretary Blinken estimated there were possibly 200 American citizens on the ground in Afghanistan who wanted to leave. These Americans, forsaken by President Biden, are now trapped behind enemy lines, dependent on the Talibanโ€™s good graces to get out of Afghanistan. 

For weeks, I have questioned senior White House and Department of Defense officials about who selected the August 31, 2021 deadline, if any military considerations required maintaining that deadline, and why the deadline could not be moved to ensure every American was evacuated from Afghanistan when we had the military assets on the ground to safely do the job. I am still waiting for answers to these and other related questions.

My Alaska constituents and their fellow Americans are also demanding answers to these basic questions, and accountability and responsibility for the hasty, chaotic, and botched withdrawal from Afghanistan, which has left hundreds of Americans stranded behind Taliban lines and our country more vulnerable to international terrorism than at any time since the attacks of September 11, 2001.

Sincerely,

Dan Sullivan

United States Senator

Association of Alaska School Boards: ‘No Covid vax, no attending events’

The Association of Alaska School Boards has a new vaccine passport policy for its upcoming events, academics, and conferences: If school board members don’t have a vaccine, they cannot attend the event.

“AASB is committed to making our in-person events safe, as your health, well-being, and safety are our topย priority. To that end, a COVID mitigation plan has been developed for all upcoming academies and conferences,” the policy states.ย 

“Therefore, allย attendees are required to submit proof of vaccination to register and attend the event. For those with a medical exemption, we will workย with each individual independently, which may include requiring a negative COVID test.

“In addition, we will also be requiring everyoneย to wear a mask while indoors at the event except for those times when you are eating or drinking,” AASB states on its web page. There is no stated end date for this policy, nor explanation of whether a booster shot will be required at some point.

The group’s annual meeting will be held next on Nov. 8 at the Anchorage Hilton.

Mayor Bronson rescinds two workplace policies that were 11th-hour moves from last administration

Anchorage Mayor Dave Bronson today rescinded two workplace policies hastily established by the previous administration of temporary Mayor Austin Quinn-Davidson: Paid Parental Leave and the Infant at Work Program.

The Paid Parental Leave Policy was announced by former Acting Mayor Austin Quinn-Davidson on June 30, 2021. The policy would award up to 160 hours of non-cashable leave for eligible employees upon either the birth of an employeeโ€™s child or a placement of a child with the employee for adoption or foster care.

The policy would significantly expand theย existing Municipalityย leave policy under the Family Medical Leave Act and Alaska Family Leave Act. Since its enactment, no Municipal employee has requested use of the Paid Parental Leave Policy.

โ€œThis Paid Parental Leave Policy was announced hastily only hours before the previous administration left office. It came with virtually no data, information, or even a basic understanding for how it would impact the Municipalityโ€™s budget or financial outlook,โ€ย said Mayor Bronson. โ€œUnfortunately, this change in policy which favored MOA executives and non-represented employees would have led to a massive financial liability that the Municipality could simply not afford.โ€


Anyone can identify as a fisherman. Order your shirt today!

The Infants at Work Program was implemented on June 15, 2020 by former Mayor Ethan Berkowitz. The program, which has faced significant criticism since its implementation, would allow municipal employees to bring their infants (up to six-months of age) to municipal premises while at work. A small number of people utilized the program.

โ€œPerhaps well intended, the application of this policy led to all sorts of unforeseen circumstances. After numerous complaints across the Municipality from employees, labor unions, and even janitorial staff, the policy was thoroughly reviewed and ultimately rescinded. As applied, this policy created massive issues while favoring only a few executive level employees,โ€ย said Mayor Bronson.ย โ€œWe recognize the need for adequate childcare, but this policy, which was implemented at the height of the previous administrationโ€™s stay at home orders, is not the right approach.โ€

Read more:

Calls, texts flood veterans’ crisis line

The primary crisis hotline for veterans experienced a 98 percent increase in the number of texts that it received during the last two weeks of August compared to the same two weeks last year, according to Stars and Stripes.

Calls to the Veterans Crisis Line increased 7 percent and online chats increased by nearly 40% during the same time period, from Aug. 13 to 29. Department of Veterans Affairs officials attribute the increase to multiple factors, includingย the withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistanย and the upcoming 20th anniversary of the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

The Veterans Administration said thereโ€™s an increased awareness of the hotline since last year and thereโ€™s not as much stigma about utilizing the resource. Read more at Stars and Stripes.

The check will bounce: Alaska House passes $1,100 dividend with money that isn’t there

The bill to fund the Permanent Fund dividend may have the governor’s name on it, but it’s not his bill anymore. HB3003 pays Alaskans less than one third of the legal amount for their annual dividend, as set by Alaska Statute.

The $1,100 PFD is also not the compromise suggested by the governor — the 50-50 plan, which would come with a constitutional amendment that voters would decide on: Should the formula for the PFD be placed in the Alaska Constitution – yes or no?

There’s a problem with it, and it all comes down to color of money. The Legislature has deviated from past law that said the Permanent Fund dividend source was the Permanent Fund Earnings Reserve Account that was transferred into dividend fund.

This year, the House majority is re-upping what passed two months ago, when the dividend is paid from different monies. One is general fund, not the ERA, and the other is the Statutory Budget Reserve.

Here’s where it gets tough: The money the House is trying to use to pay the dividend — the SBR– is not there. Money available in the SBR in June was vetoed by the governor. On June 30, any money not vetoed in the SBR was swept in to the Constitutional Budget Reserve. So the money the House is using for the dividend is not in one of the funds it’s using.

Barring anything else, such as a judge’s order, the check will bounce.

The money available for the dividend in the General Fund is only about $600 per dividend recipient, a fact pointed out by Rep. David Eastman. The vote was a gaslighting operation, to try to make this the governor’s fault if the PFD is only $600.

This is coming at time when the Permanent Fund is just shy of $83 billion.

On Monday, a proper solution for the permanent fund dividend — paying a full PFD as established by Statute — failed narrowly.

Read: House votes down statutory PFD

As for the Fiscal Plan Working Group, which was supposed to come up with a plan going forward, it saw its suggestions to allow the people of Alaska to vote on a new PFD formula ignored.

The 50-50 plan, as it is called, was accepted by many “full PFD’ legislators as their compromise.

“I thought it was our first step toward compromise. It was our step for those who might not be a full PFD person. It was a huge compromise,” said Rep. Kevin McCabe of Big Lake.

“There’s no impetus to put the PFD into a constitutional amendment. Leadership has said it will not happen,” he said. “Many of us thought it might be good. Many of us thought it might be bad. There was a path forward. The path has to start with putting it out to the voters. We have seen none of that. In fact, we have heard, ‘Don’t even try.'”

“The bill doesn’t contain a PFD. It’s not a Permanent Fund dividend. It’s just a check from the SBR and the General Fund. It’s not what we were sent down here to do. I’ll be voting no,” said Rep. Chris Kurka of Wasilla.

Rep. Adam Wool, a Democrat representing Fairbanks argued that the money is there. “I guess another court case might be happening, I don’t know,” he said. “This Permanent Fund needs to last infinitely, oil will not last infinitely,” he said, and mentioned global warming as a problem for oil in Alaska.

Rep. Liz Snyder was in favor of statutory PFD, until she wasn’t, and voted against it

Rep. Liz Snyder, who ran for office and spent $750,000 to win House District 27 away from former Rep. Lance Pruitt, ran on a full statutory Permanent Fund dividend. Now that she is the representative for East Anchorage, everything is different.

On Aug. 30, she voted against the formula, which is the law.

Here’s what Snyder told the Anchorage Daily News before the 2020 election:

“I share the same view as our incumbent, based on past public comments. I support full pfd payments based on the original formula, but recognize that we need to have a collective conversation about the sustainability of this approach and agree to any necessary changes. And in light of our current budgetary shortfall, I do not support back pay of previously reduced pfds. I would prefer to see us grow the Permanent Fund — some have targeted $100 million — so that we then have an incredible, sustainable resource to support current and future generations of Alaskans. With such a resource, we would be the envy of the rest of the US.”

The House of Representatives on Monday night voted down the legally established dividend, but has offered no legal substitute for what would be about a $3,800 payment to qualified Alaskans this year.

Her Democrat colleague, Rep. Geran Tarr, was the only Democrat who voted in favor of the full PFD.