A group of bipartisan senators introduced an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act last week, aiming to force government disclosure of unidentified anomalous phenomena records, which includes alien life forms and unidentified flying objects.
The proposed legislation, titled the “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act of 2023,” seeks to preserve and centralize all federal government records related to unidentified anomalous phenomena, ultimately enabling public access to comprehensive information on the subject.
Led by Sen. Chuck Schumer, the amendment has support from Sen. Mike Rounds (R-S.D.), Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, (D-N.Y.), Sen. Todd Young (R-Ind.), and Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.).
The amendment is a step toward increasing transparency and accountability surrounding unidentified anomalous phenomena, also commonly referred to as unidentified flying objects (UFOs) or unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs).
Sen. Rubio has made this a priority for years. In 2021, when he was vice chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, he spearheaded a similar measure with Sen. Gillibrand and Rep. Ruben Gallego, (D-Ariz.)
“UAPs pose a significant challenge to our national security, appearing in sensitive U.S. airspace and around military personnel. The amendment would establish an office that would replace the current Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Task Force and would have access to Department of Defense (DoD) and Intelligence Community data related to UAPs,” Rubio’s office said in 2021. “By doing so, the office will have the authority to establish a coordinated effort to report and respond to UAPs, significantly improve data-sharing between agencies on UAP sightings, address national security concerns, and report health effects people may experience in relation to UAP events.
The revived proposed amendment now has Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer as the key sponsor, as Rubio is in the Republican minority. Having the leader in the Senate as the key sponsor bodes well for the amendment.
It begins by emphasizing the importance of preserving and centralizing all federal government records related to unidentified anomalous phenomena. These records should carry a presumption of immediate disclosure and eventually be made available to the public to ensure a comprehensive understanding of the government’s knowledge and involvement in such phenomena.
The amendment highlights the necessity for legislation to create an enforceable, independent, and accountable process for the public disclosure of UAP records.Existing provisions, such as the Freedom of Information Act, have proven inadequate in achieving timely disclosure of records.
The legislation acknowledges the existence of unidentified anomalous phenomena records that have not been declassified or subjected to mandatory declassification review due to exemptions under existing provisions of law. It emphasizes the need to restore proper oversight over these records by elected officials in both the executive and legislative branches of the federal government.
Among the key provisions of the proposed legislation is the establishment of the Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Records Collection at the National Archives and Records Administration. This collection would serve as a centralized repository for all records related to unidentified anomalous phenomena.
The amendment also calls for creation of an Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Records Review Board. This board would be responsible for overseeing the collection, review, and release of the records, working in collaboration with relevant government offices and agencies.
Proponents like Rubio argue that increased transparency surrounding unidentified anomalous phenomena is essential for scientific research, national security, and public interest. Critics may express concerns about potential national security implications and the credibility of unidentified phenomena reports.
The introduction of the “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Disclosure Act of 2023” underscores the growing interest and recognition of unidentified aerial phenomena and the need for a comprehensive approach to studying and disclosing these phenomena, especially after the U.S. military shot down an unidentified flying object over the Arctic Ocean, and has yet to describe what it was or provide the public with any photographic evidence of the object.
The 64-page amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act is at this link.
Is it just Me or are the governments lies becoming increasingly outrageous and unbelievable. I recommend watching the videos by Hugh Ross. He is a Canadian astrophysicist. The government lies where the truth would serve Us better, but they serve satan, not GOD, not Us. They lie, remember Covid and the vaccine? Transsexualism, systemic racism, etc. They lie. Hugh Ross makes much more sense. The government LIES.
Citizen, there is no reason to blame Satan: he’s just the recipient of all the fallen fruits. Everybody is always looking to blame somebody. Sure, Satan advocates for his own interests, but look around yourself, who doesn’t? If anybody ends up in hell, that’s his doing: it’s by personal choice. What are you doing about it, old man Kane–writing a sentence or two every now and then to complain? If you are a man of substance, hit the trail like St. Paul did; otherwise just watch the events unfold!
Satan doesn’t exist. Nor does hell.
I guess you have never been married.
Yes. Happily for 39 years.
Gregory the Glib, now that you’ve firmly established that neither Satan nor hell exist, answer this: Is the translation of the King James Bible divinely inspired?
Are you talking about when the Bible was translated from Latin to English?
The 1611 KJV, Gregory! It’s not as if this is a trick question.
That’s what I thought but you never know. Funny how all the different translations occurred just to build up the church numbers.
Your belief Greg – a religion, or system of beliefs about God – is not capable of determining the veracity of Satan’s or Hell’s existence. I support your freedom to believe that and to even speak it with conviction – but you and I will find out when we pass from this life.
Obviously. I’m not worried about it at all because I’ve lived a good life and I believe in God.
Who was around to answer the question about when Cain slew Abel, Cain and his wife went to live in another society. Who exactly where those people when Adam and Eve and apparently Lilith was probably still around in that time and a few kids? Were they the Giants that were on the earth in those days, you know, The offspring from the fallen Angels who impregnated human women? Who exactly were those people pray tell?
You don’t support squat. Stop acting like you do.
Greg, I do support your freedom to be ignorant. “Lilith” is not in the Bible. Cain married one of his sisters. Angels are not capable of breeding with humans. BTW, the book I mentioned was “Chariots of the Gods”, not “Fire” – my bad – I read that one 50 years ago… Your ignorant complaints and so-called “mistakes” and/or “contradictions” in the Bible come from people like you who never read or only read part of it once the Bible. Get an education man!
I suggest if you want to complain about Christians and the Bible that you first read it and ask for help with understanding it.
Read the gospel of Phillip. Jesus kissed Mary Magdalene, his wife, on the lips and made the others jealous. They asked if he loved her more. Typical.
Telling the public there are Aliens is like talking about millions of Christians Raptured. Hahaha. Which one is more believable? I take the latter cause four historic recorded known people were already raptured. Enoch, Elijah, Jesus, Phillip, God can do anything even raise the dead even raising Himself! I’ll stick to the Bible, the world can have its aliens and chase ufos.
You are a fool then. God doesn’t need a machine to take you up.
Jen said nothing about machines doing the rapturing.
Fool. She talked about folks going up aka rapture. Enoch described what the planet looked like, but you know this. Ezekiel saw a chariot of fire, a wheel within a wheel in a vision. Sounds like a machine to me.
And you know they were raptured, how is exactly? Because the Bible tells you so? Talk about circular logic.
You need to bone up on what circular reasoning is cman. Simply stating an item and referencing her source is not circular, at worst it is begging the question. At least we Christians acknowledge that some of what we believe is not “provable” to those who do not have eyes to see nor hearts and minds capable of understanding it – it is simply belief.
Most is not provable including Jesus.
“Wisdom is proved by its works.” – Jesus
On what day did God create aliens? Was it before or after the dinosaurs?
Have you read His book?
Also Jesus thought God threw him under the bus while on the cross. Forsaken and all.
You can stick to the Bible if you want, but the Bible did not explain what my brothers and I experienced while living in Great Falls, MT 1974-1978. The Bible was the 1st place I looked. I wish Continental Airlines hadn’t lost my original Bible, as it had a lot of notes I’d written.
It’s not like I had to choose between God and aliens. In fact, aliens was definitely not my 1st thought, but as events occurred, I did research, time went on and other research was opened up because others did FOIA requests, and I simply followed the dots. They exist, they’re here, and the gov’t has been covering it up for decades.
True. Natives have known this for eons.
You can believe in God and aliens. It’s just that some on here would lose it if a saucer landed in St. Peters square.
There’s no historical record of any of those individuals outside the surviving fiction of the time. It is a disservice to others to site as fact information you’ve gleaned from a novel with objectively proven fatal flaws.
Not a student of history, are you?
Again, the “bark” is a sad whimper.
The Bible is a history book there’s no doubting that. Lots of names and places are historical fact. When they wrote the New testament three to 400 years after Jesus died, they got that much of it right. Where they lose me is when they left books out of the Bible as a way of controlling the masses. Why keep out that Jesus was married and probably had kids? Why keep out the book of Enoch, was it because aliens took him into space and he’s described what it looked like to see Earth in orbit or what the inside of the spaceship look like? The writers of the Bible needed a tight hand on everyone including their purse strings. This agenda contributes to the question that I have. A lot of it is based on myth and faith. Do I believe Moses was kept out of the land of milk and honey because he disobeyed God and made water come out of a rock for the masses? Do I believe they made manna for 40 years to feed the people in The Exodus and during that time they produced it for six days and on the seventh day they didn’t make any probably because they had to take the machine apart and clean it. When miracles turn into fact and are backed up by mechanisms, that leads someone to ask why? God the Creator doesn’t need a machine to do miracles that much is for sure and for certain. Men creating a story trying to manipulate the people do however.
Your knowledge of the Bible and the false writings is flawed Greg. We have manuscripts of the Bible that date back to the time of the eyewitnesses, who had no incentive to fabricate falsehood – they jeopardized their lives to write it. The false writings date back to about 300 A.D., and were obviously written by those who refused to believe the eyewitnesses. Tell us Greg, how much do you know about Julius Caesar? Where did your information come from? Shakespeare? There are only a handful of manuscripts relating his history, and they disagree with each other… Yet we accept them as truth. Why are you so skeptical of the Bible when thousands of ancient manuscripts that remarkably agree with each other exist?
I wonder if people’s personal bias and focus allow or disallow spiritual advancement. When I was a child I thought as a child. But now I am a man and have put away childish things. We live in a currupt, corrupting society and lust sells. When you become a much older man lusts and kisses on lips become less compelling and are not such an imperative. Females are different. God made us different for different roles. The kiss on lips to some is meaningless. Big deal. To Jen it’s a huge deal. When you have bonded in error) with a (wrong, someone else’s man) you become like a small tantruming child (even though you are a gigantic fraulein) and can’t believe someone else’s teddy bear has been taken from you! Damn them and you’ll show them (tear) . And the secular drama’s in the Bible are especially evocative in an exciting Zane Gray moment. A nice romantic guy thinks it is anti-human to leave out “the marriage” so no Bible interest for you. There are bunches of sects of Christianity. The Biible does say as your faith is so be it to you. My and Jen’s Lutheran Grandfather disliked chatechisms and attendant capture by liturgists.
A book written by flawed men with an agenda. Yeah that’s the one that I’m going to go with.. Jen
The Jewish authorities at the time, who were not only the experts on the law and Jewish scripture, but were also alive at the same time as the alleged Jesus of Nazareth was (and therefore much more reliable witnesses than the authors of the Gospels were), thought he was a fraud and convicted him of blasphemy. When they asked Jesus if he was the messiah, he gave a rather vague answer, but it was enough to make the Sanhedrin rend its garments.
Jesus declared to the Jewish leadership when they asked him to tell them plainly if he was the Messiah: “I and the Father One we Are”. I don’t call that a “vague answer”, and neither did the Jews – that is why they picked up stones. I suggest you do a detailed study of the 118th Psalm and how Jesus used it in the Gospel of John. The authors of the Gospels were the eyewitnesses. I ask the same question of you that Jesus asked the Sanhedrin: “Have you never read, ‘The Stone the Builders rejected has become the Chief Cornerstone, the Lord has done this and it is marvelous in our eyes.'” Tell us cman, what does this mean?
Yes, and even Jesus reportedly thought God had thrown him under the bus.
Do you ever contract with anyone? When you do do you like contract with people you hate? No? God had a contract with his friend. It could have been anyone. But was God’s actual friend Abraham They actually knew and liked each other. Abraham in his day always prayed and God was aware of him and liked his qualities. Scriptures said Abraham was God’s friend. God was looking for a family to bring a son into to the world to bless, redeem, heal, enrich restore all humanity after the garden debacle. It could have been anyone. The ethnic type was midveastern but could have been anyone. So the covenant for a Messiah was made. There were rules and stipulation for this family of mid easterns. It took some time and geneology shows Jesus showed up and is documented by geneology for God’s son. All the way back to the garden.
I find it fascinating how you can manage to push your version of the Bible into any conversation.
I’m beginning to think you actually aren’t Christian at all. More and more you come off as a buffoon. No truly devoted Christian would go to the efforts you do to make us look silly.
I think she looks up key points on the web. I could debate her to death most of us could.
Nah MA, Jen really cares for all of us – if there is a criticism of her writing it is that she doesn’t write as well as Suzanne.
The Bible has aliens in it. Who do you think was flying those chariots of fire? What about Ezekiel’s wheel within a wheel? It was a machine. What about the hybrid giants on the earth from offspring of fallen angels…aka aliens? You’re so blind.
You’ve been reading fiction – perhaps a book from the early 70s called “Chariots of Fire” by Erik von Daniken? Point 1: Ezekiel saw a vision, that included angels, NOT a machine. Point 2: The Nephilim were large, strong, men. They were the progeny of men who were noted for the length of their lives. They were also known for their wickedness – the chiastic structure of the Hebrew in Genesis 6:1-6 and the surrounding context of Genesis point to this as the correct interpretation. “Sons of God” is merely a reference to human males. Rendering the name Nephilim as “Giants” is suspect, but that the human gene pool is capable of producing a man 9 feet tall with 6 fingers on each hand is not unheard of. The Nephilim also appear in Numbers 13:33 post-flood – big scary guys the spies were afraid of, but still descended from Noah. My suggestion Greg is that you read the Bible, not someone else’s lame prevaricating excuse for not believing it.
This proves nothing, as usual. The giants were exactly that. Noah himself was a hybrid. White haired and glowing from birth. His father doubted that he was the sire. Tell me how folks lived for over 900 years pre flood? Beware of false prophets would be my warning to you.
900 years: because 1, the human genome was stronger; and 2, less radiation hitting the earth because of the pre-flood vapor canopy – a lot of the flood water came from the sky. “Lilith” is fiction. Where do you get the idea that Noah was white haired and glowed? Or that Noah’s father doubted his parentage? Get a life man! You don’t lie well.
I’m not familiar.
Answer my questions masabi. What does the bible say about dinosaurs. Was Adams first wife Lilith a mistake? What village did Cain go to after he rocked Able? Why were the deciples jealous because Jesus kissed Mary on the lips,? Why did Noah glow like a firefly since birth? Didn’t look human. Buler???
Dinosaurs were created on day 6 with all the land animals – the Bible mentions them in the Book of Job – I recommend you research materials from the Institute for Creation Research for excellent details. “Lilith” is fiction. Cain moved to a land called “Nod” where he founded a city called Enoch – it was not pre-existent. There is no record of Jesus kissing any Mary on the lips or of the disciples being jealous. There is no record of Noah “glowing”. Your ignorance is astounding and your prejudicial animus reprehensible.