Monday, May 11, 2026
Home Blog Page 879

Did Biden just say that 9mm should be banned?

On Memorial Day, President Biden said there is “no rational basis” for Americans owning a 9mm weapon.

In recounting the details of a visit with a trauma doctor in New York, Biden described learning about the different wounds that can be caused by different caliber firearms.

“They said a .22-caliber bullet will lodge in the lung, and we can probably get it out — may be able to get it and save the life,” Biden said on Monday to a swarm of reporters. “A 9mm bullet blows the lung out of the body.”

Biden added, “there’s simply no rational basis for [high-caliber weapons] in terms of thinking about self-protection, hunting.”

From his remarks, it appears the president is looking to not only limit the legal access to more than higher powered rifles, but wants to include the 9mm, which is the most popular caliber ammunition in America. In fact, he may as well have said he wants to disarm women, since it is the firearm of choice for those who carry.

He later clarified that he understands he doesn’t have broad power to ban these guns, saying: “I can’t dictate this stuff. I can do the things I’ve done and any executive action I can take, I’ll continue to take. But I can’t outlaw a weapon. I can’t, you know, change the background checks. I can’t do that.”

Critics point out that this is the same thing he said in 2019 when he was on the campaign trail, when at a campaign stop in Seattle, Biden asked, “Why should we allow people to have military-style weapons including pistols with 9mm bullets that can hold 10 or more rounds?”

New Biden rule ties LGBT to education funding: Boys can use girls’ bathrooms, or schools will suffer federal cuts

By CASEY HARPER | THE CENTER SQUARE

An upcoming Biden administration rule change will tie billions of dollars in federal education funding to an array of LGBT policies, forcing school districts and universities to implement controversial rules on issues like transgender athletes in order to receive federal funding.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture said this month it will change how it interprets Title IX prohibitions on discrimination based on sex “to include discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.”

That change means that schools that accept any kind of funding, including students receiving FAFSA or Pell grants or students who receive federally subsidized school lunch funding, will be subject to the new Title IX LGBT interpretation.

“As a result, state and local agencies, program operators and sponsors that receive funds from FNS must investigate allegations of discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation,” USDA said in a statement. “Those organizations must also update their non-discrimination policies and signage to include prohibitions against discrimination based on gender identity and sexual orientation.”

This means that schools around the country will be forced to comply with a range of pro-transgender policies in things like sports, housing, locker rooms and bathrooms if they want to continue receiving federal funds. The effort began when President Joe Biden issued an executive order almost immediately upon taking office.

Since then, the administration has been publicly advocating for these policies, but the expected formally published rule change later this year would codify that policy.

“Children should be able to learn without worrying about whether they will be denied access to the restroom, the locker room, or school sports,” the White House said when that order was issued in January of last year.

Sarah Perry, a legal expert at the Heritage Foundation, said the rule change would also remove recently added due process protections for students accused of sexual harassment and sexual assault, which could be particularly important if misgendering individuals is redefined to be included in the harassment category.

Not using the preferred pronoun of an individual could also land schools and universities in legal trouble under the Title IX changes.

“A third [change] that is unspoken and won’t appear in the new rule but will have implications, it will be essentially a muzzling of free speech for individuals who for example don’t toe the party line on gender identity and will be forced … to use an individual’s preferred pronouns or be faced potentially with Title IX sex discrimination charges,” Perry said. “So it will not only require the adherence to these beliefs. It will force speech. It will compel speech in violation of the First Amendment, and we have yet to even examine fully the parameters of how that is going to play out in the court room…”

Some schools are allowed to use a religious exemption to some rules like the kind laid out by the administration, but experts say it remains unclear whether the Biden administration will honor those exemptions or challenge them, which would likely lead to a legal battle.

The Biden administration said in its announcement this is a push toward “equity and fairness.”

“USDA is committed to administering all its programs with equity and fairness, and serving those in need with the highest dignity,” Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack said. “A key step in advancing these principles is rooting out discrimination in any form – including discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.”

Other critics, though, argue that girls will be victims of this policy change when schools are required to allow trans girls to use facilities designated for women, such as bathrooms, locker rooms and dorm rooms, saying it violates their privacy and opens them up to sexual assault.

They also argue it will hurt female athletes and take away their athletic opportunities. Several trans women have quickly risen to dominance in their respective sports after not having the same success when competing against men.

“This will not only have a significant impact on privacy, safety and security of women and girls but also on the equity and fairness of women to be able to participate in scholastic athletics whether at the K-12 or at the collegiate level,” Perry said, adding that these rule interpretation changes would “change the face of American education if it is approved and published, and that is not an overstatement.”

The athletics issue came to a head earlier this year when trans athlete Lia Thomas, who was born a male, easily beat Olympic silver medalists Emma Weyant and Erica Sullivan in the NCAA 500-yard freestyle championship in March.

Opponents to the upcoming rule change point out these kinds of losses as examples of unfairness and say they take scholarship opportunities away from women and give them to recently transitioned athletes.

“Lia has clear male athletic advantages – advantages that testosterone suppression cannot erase and that female athletes can’t possibly attain, no matter how hard they train,” said Jennifer Braceras, director of Independent Women’s Law Center. “This isn’t fair, and the National Collegiate Athletic Association knows it.”

Super PAC backing Sweeney for Congress files financial report with oil, Native Corps, and LGBTQ cash throughout

The signs are everywhere — the Sweeney for Congress signs, that is. They’re coming from a Super PAC that has spent handsomely to improve the name recognition for what many view as a dark horse candidate.

In fact, most of the money in the Sweeney race is being spent not by her campaign but by the Super PAC. (Full disclosure: Must Read Alaska has an ad from the group..)

A look through the financial disclosure shows that the group has major funds from Alaska Native Corporations, a generous oil services company owner (Kari and John Ellsworth, Northern Energy Services) and $50,000 from the American Unity PAC, a political action committee that supports Republicans it views as friendly to pro-gay policies.

The LGBTQ funding answers a question some have had: During a Republican forum last week, when asked to define “What is a woman,” Sweeney stood out among the four candidates on stage by only saying “I’m a woman,” before pushing the microphone toward opposing candidate Nick Begich, who talked about genetics, genetic expression, chromosomes, and protecting women’s sports. Sweeney also answered the question about whether she has a problem with transgenders competing in women’s sports: “No,” was her answer.

The Alaskans for T.A.R.A. Super PAC reported $400,000 in receipts and has spent all but $79,000.

That is the biggest but not the only Super PAC working in this race. Nick Begich has the support of Americans for Prosperity Action, a libertarian-grounded group that reported $74,597 in receipts and has spent $55,000 on canvassing and literature supporting the campaign of Nick Begich.

A group called Late Breakers PAC has spent a fraction to oppose Sarah Palin for Congress. Just $4,500 was reported by this group that comes in late in races to support Democrat candidates and oppose Republican ones.

Political action committees were required to file reports by Friday with the Federal Elections Commission.

In-person voting now available throughout state for special primary election

Beginning May 27 through June 10, Alaska voters can vote in person in the special congressional primary election. In a few places, they can even vote on the last day of the primary, June 11. In a few locations it is possible to vote in-person on June 11.

The designated voting locations are listed on the State Division of Elections website at this link.

Note, the polling places will all be closed on Memorial Day.

For those who are voting by mail, ballots must be postmarked by June 11.

All registered voters in Alaska were mailed ballots on April 27 for the special primary election to serve the remainder of the term of the late Congressman Don Young, who died March 18. There are 48 names on the ballot. The top four vote-getters will appear on the ballot on Aug. 16, when voters will rank them in the order of their preference. The winner of that election will be named the new congressional representative to serve until January.

Meanwhile, another election will take place to determine who will serve in that seat for the next two years.

Notes from the trail: Two weeks from today is the deadline for getting your ballot postmarked for special primary

Photographed above: Kelly Tshibaka and friends in Kodiak.

The special primary election for the U.S. House race deadline for getting your ballot postmarked is June 11, just two weeks from today.

How many have voted so far? 89,065 as of Friday’s report (up through Thursday).

The turnout levels within each major registration status: Republicans – 22.9%; Democrats – 19.8%; Nonpartisans – 21.9%; Undeclared – 12.6%.

Accounting for undeliverable ballots being returned, the turnout is now at about 17.5%, but in terms of what is actually expected as a turnout (in the 130,000 range of ballots), the turnout is likely over 65%.

Filing season: The Division of Elections has been a busy place over the past couple of days, as the filing deadline of June 1 approaches for the regular primary election (Aug. 16). It’s going to be very fluid until the end the filing period, as all seats in the Alaska Legislature are up for grabs except Sen. Donny Olson’s seat out in Golovin-Nome area, because his boundaries didn’t change substantially.

David Nelson files for reelection.

Spotted at the Elections counter was David Nelson (Anchorage), filing for House District 18. A Republican, he has served as representative since ousting Gabrielle LeDoux. Already in that race are Cliff Groh, Democrat, and Lynn Franks, Democrat. The district has moved slightly to the left on the political spectrum.

Rep. James Kaufman files for Senate Seat F, Anchorage.

Rep. James Kaufman was at the Division filing for South Anchorage Senate Seat F, (retiring Sen. Josh Revak), where there is already a Democrat filed, Janice Parks. Revak appears to be retiring from politics.

Jamie Allard has finished the paperwork for Alaska House.

Eagle River Assemblywoman Jamie Allard was coming out of the Division of Elections in Anchorage in the late afternoon on Friday, after officially filing for House District 23.

Maxine Dibert filed for House.

In Fairbanks at the Division of Elections, Maxine Dibert came into the building with former borough Assemblywoman Marna Sanford by her side and filled out the paperwork to run against Rep. Bart LeBon. Dibert is a Democrat, longtime teacher, and LeBon is the Republican incumbent in what is now numbered District 31.

But wait! There’s another Republican in that race — conservative activist Kelly Nash, who filed last week. She’ll be running to the right of moderate LeBon, while Dibert will peel votes from the left. This will be a spicy race!

Genevieve Mina, Democrat, filed to run for open seat for State House District 19 in Anchorage. Also in that race is Democrat Russell Wyatt.

Republican Julie Coulombe filed to run for the South Anchorage House District 11. It’s now open because Rep. James Kaufman is running for the open Senate Seat F in that neck of the woods. Also in that race for House are Ross Beiling, a Republican, and Jennifer Sonne, who is a hardline leftist running as a nonpartisan. More on her below.

Drew Cason, former legislative staff member, filed to run for the Senate seat in East Anchorage, where Democrat Rep. Geran Tarr and Democrat Assemblyman Forrest Dunbar are already candidates, but Cason’s filing was denied because he doesn’t have a required financial disclosure form on file with the Alaska Public Offices Commission. If he gets that done, there will be three Democrats in the race for the seat designed for Democrats, and no Republican candidate.

Liz Vazquez, Republican and former House member, has filed for House to run against Matt Claman for House. She recently ran for Assembly against incumbent Assemblyman Kameron Perez-Verdia.

Sonne the tire slasher: Jennifer Sonne, running for State House in Anchorage District 11, expressed her secret wish to slash the tires of a truck paving a driveway near her house. McKenna Brothers supported Dave Bronson for mayor and Sonne is as hardline leftist as they come, but this is almost Antifa-level death-wish stuff.

Kodiak crab days: Spotted in the boarding area for the plane heading to Kodiak for the crab festival was Nick Begich, Tara Sweeney, and Sen. Lisa Murkowski. Sweeney and Murkowski were huddled in conversation. Also spotted was Al Gross, running for Congress, but he doesn’t seem to be with anyone and was not wearing an Al Gross button. He was kind of incognito.

Also in Kodiak, Kelly Tshibaka for Senate and a big group of supporters in the parade, photographed above.

Nick Begich, candidate for U.S. House, is at the Kodiak Crab Festival talking to Alaskans.
Americans for Prosperity Action, an arm of AFP, has dozens of volunteers working on behalf of their “Pick Nick” campaign. They are not allowed to coordinate with the campaign itself.

Nick volunteers getting their steps in in Anchorage: Meanwhile, in Anchorage, all kinds of volunteers are combing the neighborhoods to get out the vote for Nick Begich for Congress. There are said to be over 10 canvassers going through lists and reaching out to individual voters this week in Anchorage, and next week as well on behalf of the Nick Begich for Congress effort. Anyone who wants to get involved can contact Americans for Prosperity Action: [email protected].

Spotted in Cooper Landing: Tuckerman Babcock, running for Senate for the Kenai Peninsula, was spotted at 49th Street Brewing Co. in Anchorage on Friday, and then the next day having breakfast at the Sunrise Cafe with Kristie, his wife.

Spotted in Eagle River: Jamie Allard, running for House, was seen dropping yard signs all over District 23 on Saturday. She is working hard, even though there is no one who seems to be willing to run against her. Allard will attend the Byers Lake Memorial Day remembrance on Sunday afternoon.

Sustainable Energy Conference got Alaska talking about potential of geothermal, wind, solar, and ‘all of the above’

Anchorage’s downtown looked again like the civic hub of the state this week, with the Den’aina Center hosting a large-scale energy conference, the first in many, many years. Only rather than focusing on oil and gas, this conferenced looked ahead toward some of the next opportunities for the state.

Hosted by Gov. Mike Dunleavy, the inaugural Alaska Sustainable Energy Conference drew national heavyweights to the state to discuss nothing less than the future of the civilized world. 

Dunleavy kicked off the proceedings on Tuesday in the main ballroom filled with over 500 attendees. The governor’s opening remarks harkened back to Alaska’s past and present, and projected a picture of the immense potential of Alaska’s future. 

“Alaska is an oil giant, but it has every resource to be an energy giant,” said Dunleavy. Flanked by Bill Ritter, the former Democratic governor of Colorado, Alaska’s governor was in his element, with a vision of Alaska pioneering energy independence from the global instability that is now on full display in Ukraine, Russia, and China. 

Notable individuals in the audience included executives of the state’s largest companies and industries. It also included Bill Walker, Dunleavy’s predecessor as governor who is running for the fourth time in a row. Sitting dead center in the ballroom, Walker was treated to a full experience of Dunleavy’s Rolodex as one A-list speaker succeeded another. 

Former U.S. Secretary of Energy and Texas Gov. Rick Perry provided a path for Alaska to be an “all of the above” energy state (Dunleavy earlier pointed out that Texas, the epitome of oil gusher states, has three times the renewable energy generation as crunchy liberal California).

Former U.S. Secretary of State and Congressman Mike Pompeo touched on the national security of sustainable energy sources. Democratic Governor of Louisiana John Bel Edwards participated via video in a panel with Dunleavy and Ritter on how governors can use the laboratories of democracy to pioneer energy solutions for their people ahead of federal bureaucracy. 

Outside the main hall, vendors ranging from Alaska utilities to nuclear power firms displayed information and wares. On the ground level, electric-powered sports cars from Mercedes, BMW, Tesla, and other brands caught the eyes of passersby checking out innovations hitting streets today across the world. 

What was notably absent from the conference, apart from passing remarks, was overt partisan politics or pushing a green agenda. It was clear to many observers that Alaska, and the world, is at an inflection point, and the state stands to benefit from harnessing its many sources of potential.

This was punctuated in the afternoon of the first day. Flanked by Ritter and Soldotna Rep. Ron Gilham, Dunleavy signed into law a bill he introduced to streamline the permitting system for microreactors in Alaska. It was the first nuclear energy bill in a generation signed in state, and the first time a governor of another state was present for a bill signing. Former Gov. Walker was not seen after the first day. 

The succeeding days broke into various panel discussions on investment opportunities in Alaska. It is clear America is at a disadvantage, with three-quarters of critical minerals needed for everything from solar panels to electric cars to iphones being located in China. Alaska has immense critical mineral deposits, but it will need a lot of help from Washington to, literally, clear a path from the red tape to get out from under the Beijing government’s thumb. 

What was also made apparent was Alaska’s strategic location to manufacture essential goods. That is only possible with affordable, stable energy. This was on the minds of many attendees when Dunleavy, flanked by the heads of every utility on the railbelt, announced the largest investment in power transmission in a generation. Upgrading the power lines from the Bradley Lake dam, currently the cheapest power in southcentral, allows for other sources of power to come online, protect Alaskans’ utility bills, and keep power from falling off when it is needed most. 

The day concluded with a panel by the oil and gas industry on its role in energy transition. Representatives from Hilcorp were at the stage, as was Janet Weiss, the Grande Dame of oil in Alaska. Weiss, the former head of BP Alaska and current member of the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation, brought perspective into the value of harnessing the state’s massive natural gas reserves and exporting it to coal-producing countries. 

From members of an industry that displaced the whaling oil industry and the horse-drawn means of transport, it was a piercing moment of introspection as the next ten to twenty years show great acceleration. There is a desire not to let America lose out to China and other unfree governments in the next stage of energy. 

The third and final day continued that outward look at the future, including some mind-bending contributors. Tony Seba, a venture capitalist, had a vibrant give-and-take with Dunleavy about everything from when natural gas will be displaced (Seba says mostly within 10 years) to the future of industrial agriculture (Seba says within 15 years maximum, steaks will be history, while Dunleavy, a known fan of ribeyes, disagreed). 

As Thursday ended and the hundreds of attendees walked out into the still-sunny Anchorage weather, the city seemed like it was waking up from the two years of Covid-induced paralysis. Few masks were seen in the crowd of what were, almost certainly, a more left-of-center demographic. Reactions to the conference included surprise that a Republican governor cares about alternative energy (ignoring the role President Donald Trump played in accelerating the movement without much media notice) to urgency on getting Alaska’s house in order before another global movement creates additional supply shocks. 

What was evident as the conference closed is that Alaska remains a deep reservoir of potential for generational energy production, if only it can create the right business-friendly climate that invites the necessary investment for these large-scale projects.

In a state notorious for its almost third-world hostility to business, that will be a tough sell. But if Gov. Dunleavy’s conference showed anything, it is that one opportunity did not have to come at the expense of another. 

Tom Boutin: Join me in voting for John Coghill

By TOM BOUTIN

A number of people have called to ask me how in the world Alaskans can choose from among the 48 candidates running to fill the late Congressman Don Young’s shoes. Everyone seems to know someone in the race but in almost every case that candidate seems to be completely unknown beyond one town or village. For that one reason a small group of apparent front-runners has emerged.

From my perspective it’s easy to eliminate the candidate with the greatest name recognition. When I was 4 years old, my parents, just emerging from their teens, moved from the French-speaking pulp mill town of 13,000 to the adjacent town of 3,000 where Protestants and pulp mill managers lived. At first we lived in a rental  A 6-year-old girl from the next rental told me there is no Santa Claus, and even at that time I was an avid reader, so likely required very little convincing.   

By the time I was 12, both families had moved to owned homes and that girl had become unarguably attractive. So I told her she might owe me another rite of passage because of that Santa Claus experience. Feigning, I think, some shock, she informed her father, a huge Irishman with hands as large as my head. Fortunately he had a great sense of humor and applauded my imagination without commenting on my apparent (and unrealized) intentions. 

There still is no Santa Claus. Reading the background and positions offered by candidate Claus, I can see that his candidacy is an attention-grabbing publicity stunt, and a joke; far too much and far too little all at one time.

I first met Sarah Palin when she was Wasilla Mayor. When she ran, unsuccessfully as it turned out, for lieutenant governor, I saw that she had some surprising kind of star quality foretelling expanded horizons. There was one campaign photo that had her wearing a shooting vest and holding a break-open trap gun on her shoulder. I sent that photo to friends and gun rights people around the country, and over 100 people wrote back to say they envied Alaska for having candidates like that. 

After she easily won the her gubernatorial primary I helped her, at her request, gain fluency in one particular issue in that race – public employee retiree actuarial arithmetic – and was happy she bested the two challengers who had tag-teamed their assault. I sat with her then husband at one of the gubernatorial debates. 

She is no dummy, and she has remarkable instincts for publicity. She handily won her debate against the man who is now our President.

I do not support her run at our one US House seat. We would dread the national drama of whom she’s dating now, what she said on this or that talk show, and whether Alaska was moved ahead or backwards by the latest appearance on a talent show. Congress is not merely a stage for one-liners. Oratory zingers that make the nightly news, clever though they may sometimes be, don’t do all that much for Alaska voters. I strongly believe that years in the spotlight have robbed Sarah Palin of any ability to come up with new ideas or to be more than a characterization of her former self.   

Yes, Congressman Don Young could sometimes succumb to temptations to shock The Beltway with the odd exclamation, and most Alaskans were happy to abide, but we are not ready to replace Don Young with Sarah Palin. Indeed, she could not replace him. 

I don’t believe we would be well served with Tara Sweeney. I watched her Must Read Alaska interview on Facebook and was surprised that she didn’t feel the need to speak one word to Alaska Republicans. Moreover, she lacks energy and ideas. I think that everyone we send to Congress must and will look out for Native corporations, and I have no doubt that every Congress and every White House will pay special attention to the needs and desires of Alaska Natives, whether they reside in Alaska or not, but it’s clear to me that Tara Sweeney may see little need to look out for the broader values and concerns that Alaskans generally have about what Washington will next do to us.  

Juneau Empire coverage of a recent debate open only to Alaska Native candidates from within the 48 says that Tara Sweeney named sovereignty as the top challenge facing the U.S. Congress. Congressman Young was without peer in finding balance, and everything I have read from Tara Sweeney or heard her say indicates she does not understand how he did that.

I have been a supporter of Sen. Josh Revak in his short public career — until this one race.  I attended Anchorage fundraisers for his Alaska Senate efforts, and I have had high hopes for his continued progress.  However, in this field of 48 he has become a man in search of a headline, and he seemingly wants to be Sara Palin, Version II. Congressman Young was great at reassuring Big Labor without kowtowing to them, but it’s not clear to me that Josh Revak can learn how to do that. After all, he worked for Congressman Young, so if he hasn’t learned it by now… 

And finally, if Josh Revak picks fights with Alaska conservatives in order to gain votes in this crowded Congressional race, then I worry that he would forget all about Alaskans if we elected to send him to Washington.

I remain skeptical that we should give our one seat in the US House to someone never elected to public office, and that is my main concern regarding Nick Begich. I see him posing with a shotgun in a campaign ad and worry that he is a box-checker.  We need authenticity.  I think his transition from a Don Young campaign co-chair to a Don Young opponent smacks of self-interest, and I don’t believe that plays well in Alaska. We value steadfast loyalty. We were loyal to Don Young through thick and thin, and his passing should not serve as a windfall to anyone. Nick Begich is untried and untested, and his decisions as a candidate are anything but reassuring.

Of the candidates that have emerged from the pack the one with the best as well as the most extensive record is John Coghill, of Nenana and Fairbanks.    Alaska values are not boxes to check for John but instead have always been a way of life.    He has ever been anything but a publicity hound, and he has never tried to be on both sides of an issue in order to please opposing constituencies.   We always know where John Coghill stands, and we always know where we stand with him.   When we send someone to Washington we need to have the best possible understanding of what is important to them.  We would never see Congressman Coghill saying something embarrassing or stupid on the national news.  We get to send only three people to Washington, and no one else among the 48 could do as well for the Alaska team.

The problems facing America have been completely reshuffled and re-prioritized over the past two or three years, and Alaska has a large role in most or all of the eventual outcomes. John Coghill doesn’t require on-the-job training, and we won’t see him on a reality television show, nor will we see him doing anything but working hard in the U.S/ Congress representing all Alaskans. Please join me in voting for John Coghill.

Tom Boutin spent more than 17 years in state government, but also had a career spanning 30 years in the private sector, much of it in timber. He retired as president of the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority.

Poll: 62% of Americans support LNG exports to Europe to help countries reduce dependence on Russian energy

European countries, which are heavily dependent on Russian oil and gas, could benefit by diversifying its energy sources. Some 61% of Americans surveyed by the Pew Research Center say they favor the United States expanding production to export large amounts of natural gas to European countries to meet that need. A smaller share (37%) say they would oppose expanding natural gas production to export to countries in Europe.

Seven-in-ten Republicans and Republican-leaning independents favor exporting large amounts of natural gas to European countries, as do a somewhat smaller majority of Democrats and Democratic leaners (55%), the Pew Research Center survey finds. The Democrats surveyed were more concerned about climate change and the impact that more natural gas usage may have on it.

In response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, European countries, including Germany and Italy, announced plans to phase out oil and gas imports from Russia – the largest supplier of energy to Europe.

The Biden administration has pledged to increase natural gas exports to the European Union, though a large increase in natural gas exports could face challenges, including production timelines and existing pipeline and export terminal capabilities.

While the survey finds broad support for exporting natural gas to Europe, the findings also underscore how potential impacts on domestic prices are front-of-mind for large shares of Americans.

Two-thirds (67%) say the impact on natural gas prices in the U.S. should be a major consideration when it comes to whether the U.S. should export large amounts of natural gas to European countries. Both those in favor of and opposed to exporting U.S. natural gas to Europe agree that the impact on domestic prices should be a major consideration.

Prices rank ahead of other considerations, including the impact on climate change and the Russian economy. About half (51%) say the impact on climate change should be a major consideration when it comes to whether the U.S. should export large amounts of natural gas to Europe. Those who oppose increasing natural gas exports to Europe are more likely than those who favor this to say that climate impacts should be a major consideration (64% vs. 44%). Climate experts have raised concerns about the effects that President Joe Biden’s plan to increase natural gas exports might have on the administration’s climate goals.

Read this story at Pew Research Center.

Texas Public Safety director: Uvalde chief of police was ‘wrong’ not to confront school shooter sooner

By DAN MCCALEB | THE CENTER SQUARE

The commander in charge of the police response to Tuesday’s mass shooting at an Uvalde elementary school made the “wrong decision” to not send officers into the classroom to confront the gunman who shot and killed 19 children and two fourth grade teachers, Texas Department of Public Safety Director Steve McCraw said Friday.

The chief of the Uvalde Consolidated School District Police Department, who was in charge of the initial response at Robb Elementary School, thought the shooter, 18-year-old Uvalde resident Salvador Ramos, was barricaded inside that classroom and that no other children were at risk, McCraw said.

“Obviously, based on the information we have, there were children in that classroom that were still at risk,” McCraw said. “From the benefit of hindsight where I’m sitting now, of course, it was not the right decision. It was the wrong decision. Period.”

Nearly 20 officers stood in a hallway outside of the classroom for more than 45 minutes before federal Border Patrol agents arrived and used a master key to open the door and kill the gunman, he said.

Outside the school, parents, neighbors and others said law enforcement waited close to an hour before confronting Ramos and killing him. Videos posted online showed a chaotic scene of parents pleading with officers who remained outside to enter the school as the active shooting incident was ongoing.

Victor Escalon, South Texas regional director in the Department of Public Safety, said at a Thursday news conference that the first officers on the scene did enter the school once they arrived but were shot at and began evacuating students and school personnel.

“Four minutes [after Ramos entered the school and began shooting students], local police departments, the Uvalde Police Department, the Independent School District Police Department are inside, making entry,” Escalon said. “They hear gunfire, they take rounds, they move back, get cover. And during that time, they approach where the suspect is at.”

After two officers were shot, Escalon said, law enforcement decided to start evacuating as many students and school personnel as they could.

About an hour after the shooting started, a tactical team from U.S. Border Patrol arrived, entered the building and killed the suspect, authorities said.

​Dan McCaleb is the executive editor of The Center Square. Contact him at [email protected].