Friday, August 1, 2025
Home Blog Page 312

Passing: Donna Gilbert, Fairbanks tax cap advocate

Donna Gilbert, who was elected to the Fairbanks North Star Borough Assembly and later to the Fairbanks City Council, has died. She was one of the most well-known Fairbanks advocates for the tax cap, and was honored on Monday evening at the Borough Assembly.

Raised in Fairbanks, Gilbert was known for ending her tax cap advocacy voicemails with, “Meet you at the borough building.” She served on borough Assembly from 1989-1992 and then on the city council from 2001-2004.

She formed Interior Taxpayers Association and advocated or passage of the borough tax cap. The group she built is still active today and recently activated to defeat a ballot effort in Fairbanks to blow through the tax cap. She also managed the Ranch Motel until it closed in 2013 and she moved to Leesburg, Florida.

Her sister relayed that Donna died in her sleep; she was 80 years old.

Watch as she advocates for a tax cap in this video from a candidate forum in 2007:

Texas, Montana sue Biden over rule requiring states to pay for ‘gender transition’

By BETHANY BLANKLEY | THE CENTER SQUARE

Texas and Montana have sued the Biden administration over another federal rule change it implemented, this time over one that requires states to pay for “gender transition” procedures through their Medicaid programs.

It also requires health-care providers to perform such procedures in states where the practice has been banned, including in Montana and Texas. Their state legislatures passed bills their governors signed into law prohibiting “gender transition” procedures from being performed on minors in their states, among other restrictions.

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court Eastern District of Texas Tyler Division. It names U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra and Melanie Fontes Rainer, the director of the Office of Civil Rights within the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, as well as CMMS and HHS, as defendants.

At issue are changes to the HHS’ CMMS rule, “Nondiscrimination in Health Programs and Activities,” promulgated last month under Section 1557 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA). It requires health-care providers to perform “gender-transition” medical procedures, including on children, or risk losing federal funding.

It also includes multiple definitions and amendments to regulations related to sexual orientation and gender identity. It is slated to become effective 60 days from May 6, when it was published in the Federal Register.

The lawsuit argues, “Section 1557 does not authorize – and has never authorized – the federal government to compel anyone to perform or pay for ‘gender-transition’ procedures.” It also argues the rule change is unlawful, violates the Constitution, and asks the court to “set it aside and issue injunctive relief.”

“The Biden Administration is attempting to exact radical social change by defunding States and healthcare providers across the country who refuse to provide or pay for dangerous and experimental ‘gender-transition’ medical activities,” the complaint states. “Through a sweeping new rule promulgated under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), those who do not conform to the Biden Administration’s gender-ideology regime stand to lose all federal healthcare funds, including Medicaid and Medicare dollars.”

The rule “purports to override and preempt all State laws to the contrary, ensuring that the Biden Administration’s assumption of control over the States’ regulation of health and safety is complete,” the complaint continues. It also notes that the rule “relies on a misapplication of the Affordable Care Act which never authorized HHS or any government agency to compel institutions to perform or pay for these procedures.”

“This is yet another example of Joe Biden trying to sidestep the Constitution and use agency rulemaking to advance unpopular, unlawful, and destructive policies,” Texas Attorney General Paxton said. “We are suing to stop the Biden Administration from withholding federal healthcare funds to force medical professionals to perform these experimental and dangerous procedures.”

Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen made similar arguments, adding that “Healthcare providers should not be forced to perform dangerous and life-altering experimental procedures under the threat of losing the federal funding they rely on to keep their doors open. And the states should not be compelled to foot the bill for treatments that are leaving people, even children, with irreversible damage.”

Knudsen, who has led the charge to protect female athletes and students protected under Title IX, also notes that Section 1157 originally banned any federally funded health program from discriminating on grounds prohibited under Title IX.

Title IX, which is part of the Education Amendments Act of 1972, prohibits discrimination “on the basis of sex.” It states, “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.”

Over two years ago, Knudsen led a coalition of 15 AGs calling on the U.S. Department of Education to cancel its plan to revise Title IX, The Center Square reported. The administration ignored their request and published its controversial rule change roughly two years later. Montana, Texas and multiple states sued, arguing the rule change was illegal.

Both the DOE and HHS CMMS rule changes equate “sex” discrimination with discrimination based on “gender identity,” a wrong interpretation of federal law, the lawsuits argue.

The HHS CMMS rule “will wreak financial havoc” on states’ medical systems, the AGs argue. States receive billions of dollars in federal health-care aid to administer several welfare programs. The rule imposes “unlawful strings on that aid,” penalizing states that prohibit “gender transition” procedures and health plans from insuring them.

Sen. Sullivan blasts Navy for failing in shipbuilding, and focusing on climate change while China surges

The U.S. Navy is in the midst of a shipbuilding crisis that will leave the United States outmatched in an increasingly dangerous world if it is not addressed soon, says Alaska’s U.S. Sen. Dan Sullivan.

“This week, the Senate Armed Services Committee is negotiating the details of the National Defense Authorization Act, legislation that has passed every year since its inception. It is critical that the committee, of which I am a member, address the shipbuilding crisis in this legislation. My colleagues on both sides of the aisle and I have a number of amendments to the NDAA addressing this crisis. Congress must intervene because it has been abundantly clear that President Joe Biden and his secretary of the Navy will not,” Sullivan wrote in the Washington Examiner on Tuesday.

Recently, Sullivan led a Senate delegation to the Indo-Pacific, a place where the U.S. Navy is key to America’s security as well as the security of her allies in Asia, including Taiwan. Freshly back from the trip, Sullivan articulated some key concerns in his column that focused on Navy preparedness.

“The concern over declining American shipbuilding power was front and center. As I spoke with the newly elected Taiwanese president, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s ships were encircling the island democracy,” Sullivan said.

China’s navy is expanding rapidly, Sullivan said, and is on pace to have more than 400 warships by 2027 — just three years from now. That’s the same year that China’s President Xi Jinping has directed his forces to be ready to invade Taiwan.

“Meanwhile, under Biden, the U.S. Navy has shrunk to just 293 ships and is on pace to shrink to 280 in 2027 — what could amount to a dangerous 120-ship deficit compared to the Chinese navy,” he said.

“After years of pressure from Congress, Biden’s Navy Secretary Carlos Del Toro recently completed a review of the devastating state of the Navy’s shipbuilding programs. The results of that review were abysmal: five of the Navy’s major shipbuilding programs — the Columbia-class submarine, the Constellation-class frigate, the Ford-class aircraft carriers, and the Block IV and Block V Virginia-class submarines — are all delayed between one and three years,” Sullivan said.

Instead of doing his job, the Navy secretary has focused on climate change and the so-called “climate crisis,” and his report to Congress did not mention shipbuilding, lethality, or warfighting.

“Likewise, in his strategic guidance that he issued to the Navy and Marine Corps, an important document that lays out the secretary’s vision for our naval force, he mentioned climate change nine times but didn’t once address increasing the size of the U.S. fleet during these dangerous times,” Sullivan said.

“In my 30 years of public service, I’ve never seen U.S. Navy readiness at such a low point. And it’s not just me. This is a widespread, bipartisan concern. Numerous experts have also warned how ill-prepared our Navy is to meet global challenges and to keep us safe, particularly in the vital Indo-Pacific region, which includes my home state, Alaska. Recently, experts from the Congressional Research Service told me that ‘the U.S. Navy is in its worst state for designing, building, maintaining, and crewing ships in over 40 years,'” Sullivan wrote.

Sullivan has made amendments to the National Defense Authorization Act to address this crisis by requiring the Navy to be more predictable with procurement profiles so industry can respond with capital investments and workforce development, increasing the tenure of the admiral in charge of ship design and procurement, and working toward increasing our country’s shipbuilding capacity by identifying viable locations for two additional shipyards west of the Panama Canal. He also has called upon the Navy to turn its attention to fighting readiness, rather than climate change.

Because the Navy secretary is failing in his responsibilities, Congress must step in to fulfill its Article I constitutional responsibility “to provide and maintain a Navy,” wrote Sullivan, who serves on the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Jury doesn’t buy Hunter Biden’s lies, finds him guilty

President Joe Biden’s son Hunter was found guilty by a Delaware jury of making false statements while purchasing a firearm, unlawful possession of a firearm, and making other false statements regarding information kept by federally licensed firearms dealers.

The charges stem from his use of and alleged addiction to illegal drugs at the time he was buying a Colt Cobra .38-caliber on Oct. 12, 2018, and lying about his drug use on purchasing forms. Federal law bans users of illegal drugs from possessing firearms.

Hunter Biden, now 54, wrote about his drug addiction to crack cocaine in his memoir, but said during his trial that he wasn’t using drugs at the time of the purchase. But evidence presented by the prosecutor in Delaware showed an April 2018 photograph of Hunter with drugs, and text messages from him about using drugs in the days following his firearms purchase.

The jury deliberated for about three hours over two days before the verdict was read on Tuesday. Hunter Biden now faces sentencing and a maximum of 25 years in prison.

The New York Times wrote sympathetically, “The verdict brought an end to an extraordinary trial that made painfully public Mr. Biden’s drug addiction. President Biden has said he would not pardon his son.”

During the trial, FBI agent Erika Jensen testified about the authenticity of Hunter Biden’s laptop, which is had evidence of Hunter Biden’s drug and gun purchase.

The laptop had been discredited by Biden supporters prior to the 2020 election and its existence was suppressed by the mainstream media after the New York Post published a bombshell article about it. Twitter, under its former owners, banned the New York Post‘s Twitter account and shadow-banned all information relating to the laptop in the weeks prior to the presidential elections. Fifty-one former U.S. intelligence officers signed a letter calling the Hunter Biden laptop “Russian disinformation.”

During the trial, things got testy when Hunter Biden’s wife Melissa Cohen-Biden shouted at former Trump White House aide Garrett Ziegler and called him a “Nazi piece of s—.” Ziegler was part of the Trump team that tried to make public the contents of the laptop as a way derail Joe Biden in the final days leading up to the 2020 election.

Appeals court rules against student wearing ‘There are only two genders’ shirt to school

By BRENDAN CLAREY | CHALKBOARD NEWS

A federal appeals court has affirmed the decision of a lower court ruling on a Massachusetts school which told a student he could not wear a shirt saying “There are only two genders” and a similar one that censored the phrase to protest the school’s decision. 

The First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of a lower court this week that administrators at John T. Nichols Middle School in Middleborough, Massachusetts were able to tell student Liam Morrison to take his shirt off because it was offensive to gender-expansive youth.

At issue in the case, which was previously covered by Chalkboard, was the tension between Morrison’s free speech rights and those of other students at Middleborough Public School to be exposed to messages they would find hateful or harmful because of their gender identity.

The opinion explained that some LGBTQ+ Nichols Middle School (NMS) students said they had attempted to commit suicide and that about 10-20 students attended the school’s Gay Straight Alliance Club. 

Despite this, seventh-grade student Liam Morrison wore a shirt to school in March of 2023 that said, “There Are Only Two Genders.” 

“[Morrison] wore the Shirt both to express his own views, which he understood to be contrary to those NMS espouses on the subject, and to convey his belief that his views are not ‘inherently hateful,’” the opinion reads. 

School administrators told him to take off the shirt and said in subsequent emails that it targeted “students of a protected class; namely in the area of gender identity.” 

After Morrison’s family filed a lawsuit on his behalf, a district court ruled that school staff were “well within their discretion to conclude” that the shirt’s message would invalidate or erase students who identified as neither male nor female and that students “have a right to attend school without being confronted by messages attacking their identities.”

The appellate court agreed. The opinion filed Sunday said the shirt was demeaning to transgender and gender nonconforming students at NMS and that part of the issue was the age of the students to whom the shirt’s message was directed. The court ruled administrators reasonably predicted the effect the shirt would have on students. 

“We agree with the District Court and so cannot say the message, on its face, shows Middleborough acted unreasonably in concluding that the Shirt would be understood — in this middle school setting in which the children range from ten-to-fourteen years old — to demean the identity of transgender and gender nonconforming NMS students,” the court ruled. 

The 70-page opinion examined the legal precedence of free speech in school settings, often relying on the 1969 case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, which found that students could wear armbands to protest the Vietnam War.

Part of the appellate court’s consideration were the “special characteristics of the school environment” raised in Tinker. Case law after Tinker also considers how to weigh the free speech rights of students against the rights of other students who are targeted by that speech. 

The court said that, ultimately, educators are charged with deciding whether a message on a T-shirt would disrupt class and hurt the learning environment.

“We conclude the record supports as reasonable an assessment that the message in this school context would so negatively affect the psychology of young students with the demeaned gender identities that it would ‘poison the educational atmosphere’ and so result in declines in those students’ academic performance and increases in their absences from school,” the opinion reads. 

The question of who determines when something crosses the line is one Chief Judge David J. Barron asked during oral arguments in February.

“The question here is not whether the T-shirts should have been barred. The question is who should decide whether to bar them — educators or federal judges,” the court’s opinion reads. “Based on Tinker, the cases applying it, and the specific record here, we cannot say that in this instance the Constitution assigns the sensitive (and potentially consequential) judgment about what would make ‘an environment conducive to learning’ at NMS to us rather than to the educators closest to the scene.”

Women in charge: Anchorage mayor-elect names top staff

Anchorage Mayor-elect Suzanne LaFrance has chosen her campaign manager, Katie Scovic, as chief of staff for her administration, which begins July 1.

Scovic, originally from Chicago, lives in downtown Anchorage and is a registered Democrat. Scovic previously worked for Agnew Beck, an Anchorage consulting firm that gets many city contracts. She was briefly communication director for interim Mayor Austin Quinn-Davidson, and worked at Cook Inlet Housing Authority as well as for organizations in Chicago.

As municipal manager, LaFrance has chosen Rebecca Windt-Pearson, who is senior vice president and general counsel, and chief administrative officer at GCI General Communication, Inc. She was appointed Anchorage municipal attorney by Mayor Ethan Berkowitz and was law clerk to Alaska Supreme Court Justice Morgan Christen, who was appointed by President Barack Obama to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Windt-Pearson has said in a GCI blog post that the highlight of her career was  the sale of Municipal Light and Power to Chugach Electric, a project that she led at the municipality. She believes the sale has had a positive effect on the city.

Both Scovic and Windt-Pearson signed the petition to recall Gov. Mike Dunleavy in 2019 — but so did Mayor-elect LaFrance, who is technically a nonpartisan. Windt-Pearson should have no trouble being confirmed by the Anchorage Assembly, while Scovic does not need confirmation.

Cruise ship foes in Juneau come up short on signatures to get Saturday ship ban on ballot

A signature-gathering drive to ban cruise ships from Alaska’s capital city on Saturdays has fallen short of the needed signatures to get the question on the Oct. 1 Juneau municipal ballot.

Karla Hart, a well-known cruise ship critic, is leading the effort to get the issue before Juneau voters. She and her group are proposing “ship free Saturdays,” with no cruise ships that have more than 250 passengers allowed to stop in Juneau on Saturdays or on July 4.

The petition needed 2,359 signatures to be validated by the city clerk. Only 2,069 were certified as valid, with 290 more needed to get the question in front of voters. The group pushing the petition have 10 days to remediate the shortage by gathering the 290 signatures.

“Out of the 60 books we received from the petitioners committee, the only complete book that was rejected outright was book #60 due to lack of notarization,” City Clerk Elizabeth “Beth” McEwen wrote to the petitioners.

Read McEwen’s letter at this link.

The Juneau city government has already crafted an agreement with cruise ship companies to cap the number of cruise visitors starting in 2026. The agreement has the cruise lines agreeing to coordinate their schedules to limit passengers arriving in Juneau at 16,000 per day Sunday through Friday and 12,000 on Saturdays. But the petitioners want to go further and stop all large cruise ship activity on Saturdays during the 22-week cruise season.

A second petition is circulating in Juneau that would place a recall question on the ballot to boot School Board President Deedie Sorensen and Vice President Emil Mackey. Petitioners are upset that the school board is preparing to consolidate campuses to meet the needs of a shrinking student population.

That group was authorized on April 10 to begin collecting signatures and had 60 days in which to obtain the signatures of 2,359 qualified Juneau voters.

National debt closes in on $35 trillion

The federal government has spent $855 billion more than it has collected in fiscal year 2024, which began Oct. 1, resulting in a national deficit. The government has collected $2.96 trillion in revenue, according to the U.S. Department of Treasury.

In fiscal year 2023, the federal government collected $4.44 trillion in revenue, with primary source of revenue being individual income taxes.

In 2023 the federal government spent $6.13 trillion in government programs, with the majority spent on Social Security.

In this fiscal year, however, the majority of expenditures is on Medicaid/Medicare (socialized medicine), at over $1.7 trillion; Social Security at over $1.4 trillion; Defense at $900 billion; and interest on national debt at over $865 billion a year.

As far as what the U.S. government owes its lenders, it’s now more than $34.8 trillion. Four months ago, it was $34.2 trillion.

View the U.S. Debt Clock at this link.

The national debt obligation for each citizen — taxpaying and non-taxpaying alike — is now over $78,000 per citizen. Debt-to-GDP ratio, a measurement of fiscal soundness, exceeds 121%. Back in 1960, the debt-to-GDP ratio was less than 53%.

The debt-to-GDP ratio indicates the country’s ability to pay back its debts.

“A country with a high debt-to-GDP ratio typically has trouble paying off external debts (also called public debts), which are any balances owed to outside lenders. In such scenarios, creditors are apt to seek higher interest rates when lending,” Investopedia explains. “A study by the World Bank found that countries whose debt-to-GDP ratios exceed 77% for prolonged periods experience significant slowdowns in economic growth.” Every percentage point of debt above 77% costs countries 0.017 percentage points in economic growth.

The U.S. debt-to-GDP for Q4 2023 was almost double 2008 levels, the investor information website says.

The U.S. government finances deficit spending by issuing U.S. Treasuries, which are historically considered to be the safest bonds with the least amount of risk in the world.

The 10 largest holders of U.S. Treasuries (as of March 2024) are:

  1. Japan: $1.2 trillion
  2. China, Mainland: $767.4 billion
  3. United Kingdom: $728.1 billion
  4. Luxembourg: $399.3 billion
  5. Canada: $359.1 billion
  6. Ireland: $317.8 billion
  7. Belgium: $317.1 billion
  8. Cayman Islands: $302.9 billion
  9. France $283.1 billion
  10. Switzerland $262.9 billion

Trump says he will announce running mate at GOP convention, four days after scheduled sentencing

Former President Donald Trump, the Republican nominee for president, said he will reveal his choice for his vice president running mate during the Republican National Convention, which is set for July 15-18 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Trump, in an interview with Dr. Phil McGraw, disclosed his plan, saying, “I can’t yet, but we have some very good people,” he said in response to Dr. Phil’s question about whether he would tell him the name of his running mate. “I’m going to do it in the convention,” which occurs four days after a New York judge is planning to sentence him for his guilty verdicts regrind 34 felony counts. A New York law, passed specifically to ensnare Trump retroactively, makes falsifying business records in the first degree (with intent) a Class E felony with a maximum sentence of four years in prison for each count. Although unlikely, the judge could sentence him to prison immediately, and by doing so, force him to miss convention.