Monday, May 4, 2026
Home Blog Page 202

David Boyle: Anchorage School Board uses DEI to disadvantage a top-performing charter school

By DAVID BOYLE

The Anchorage School Board decided to repurpose one of its closed schools — Lake Hood Elementary School — and make it into a Alaska Native Cultural Charter School.  

The board defied the Administration’s recommendation that the Rilke Schule German Immersion Charter School be transferred to the closed Lake Hood campus.

But the board instead pulled the DEI card and pushed the Rilke Schule kids to the back of the proverbial bus.

More than a hundred Rilke Schule parents and students have testified to the excellent learning occurring at the school.  The school has outperformed most of Anchorage’s schools by a significant margin in PEAKS state standardized testing for all grades:

School/DistrictEnglish Language ArtsMath
Anchorage          36%          36%
Rilke Schule          60%          60%
Alaska Native Cultural Charter School          23%          17%

So much for rewarding outstanding performance.

On the other hand, the Alaska Native Cultural Charter School students are vastly underperforming other average Anchorage students.

Rilke Schule is also more cost-effective to operate than the Alaska Native Cultural Charter School.

As background, here is the per student cost comparison between Rilke Schule and Alaska Native Cultural Charter School:

SchoolLocal, State & FederalLocal & State Only
Rilke Schule             $14,047              $10,224
Alaska Native Cultural Charter School             $19,15              $11,545

(The Alaska Native Cultural Charter School receives more than $5,000 in federal dollars per student.)

The Alaska Native Cultural Charter School has been housed in district buildings for several years. It last shared facilities with Bettye Davis East High School, which was not a good fit for the younger students. Two years ago, it moved into the recently closed Abbott Loop Elementary School for at least five years.

Unlike the Rilke Schule Charter German Immersion Charter School, the Alaska Native Cultural Charter School has not had to pay rent for its facilities, which can be a substantial expense for any charter school. Rilke Schule pays $738,000 in rent, which takes up to 20% of its operating budget. The Alaska Native Cultural Charter School has paid zero rent.

The Alaska Native Cultural Charter School finally came to the discussion at the 11th hour on Feb. 6, when its representative testified that the Lake Hood Elementary School campus was a good fit for its school.

An Alaska Native Cultural Charter School representative stated that because her school was a Title 1 school, it should be able to move into Lake Hood, which was also a Title 1 school. That reasoning makes very little sense in determining which school should move into the closed Lake Hood campus.

The Alaska Native Cultural Charter School Academic Policy Committee president stated that, “Awarding this facility to a school that does not require Title 1 funding would deprive our community of critical resources.”

He further stated, “By not choosing ANCCS, you are reinforcing a system in which our voices and needs are marginalized and our history of trauma minimized.  It is one of equity, cultural preservation, and social justice.”

Enter Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion — DEI.

That set off alarm bells for board member Pat Higgins (formerly the board representative from the Marshall Islands) who moved to amend the memo by replacing Rilke Schule with the Alaska Native Cultural Charter School for the move.  

“I am not going to abandon the Alaska Native Cultural Charter School,” Higgins said. But he seems to have no problem abandoning Rilke Schule children.

Higgins also has some conflicts of interest, as was recently the senior director of human resources for Tlingit and Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska.

Board member Margo Bellamy wondered why the Alaska Native Cultural Charter School got so concerned at this last minute.  She noted that the school had another three years it could stay in the closed Abbott Loop School. And voters approved a bond which has more than $2 million to bring Abbott Loop School up to code. That money is still available.

Remember, the administration recommended that Rilke Schule be housed in the closed Lake Hood School because its current lease was expiring this year. On the other hand, Alaska Native Cultural Charter School just moved into the closed Abbott Loop School and has another three years remaining with a fire code exemption.

Here are some more facts to consider. Rilke Schule has 485 students and Alaska Native Cultural Charter School has 342 students. Thus, the large Lake Hood School is a much better fit for Rilke Schule. Clearly, the Rilke Schule with 143 more students has a greater need for more space than does the ANCCS.

Here are the facts from the most recent Capital Improvement Plan that should be considered in this decision to occupy the closed Lake Hood School:

SchoolSquare FootageClassroomsStudent CapacityStudent Count
Lake Hood 61,54929469XXX
Alaska Native Cultural Charter School58,34116**342
Rilke Schule39,50023**485

(** the CIP gives no student capacity for charter schools)

The Alaska Native Cultural Charter School has more than enough current square footage to accommodate its students. On the other hand, Rilke Schule is squeezing its students into a very small building.

The Alaska Native Cultural Charter School only has 16 classrooms while the Lake Hood School has almost double that number.  The Rilke Schule requires almost 50% more classrooms than the Alaska Native Cultural Charter School.

The choice is clear when one considers these facts: Rilke Schule needs much more space than does the Alaska Native Cultural Charter School; Rilke Schule’s lease expires this summer while the Alaska Native Cultural Charter School has three more years in the Abbott Loop facility.

But facts don’t matter when DEI is dominant in the decision-making process.

The rationale for allowing the Alaska Native Cultural Charter School to move into the Abbott Loop School must fall under the Diversity, Equity and Inclusion guardrail the board has established.  

The administration was right in choosing Rilke Schule. The board was wrong in choosing ANCCS.

Financially it makes no sense. Logically it makes no sense.  

But when DEI enters into the equation, logic and finances are cancelled.

David Boyle is the education writer at Must Read Alaska.

Trump’s tariff strategy to correct trade imbalance revives hopes for $44 billion Alaska gas pipeline

14

There’s a new wrinkle that could dramatically improve the likelihood Alaska could see a multi-billion dollar liquefied natural gas pipeline built from the North Slope to tidewater in Nikiski.

State leaders have for decades attempted to kickstart the mega project that could bring an economic boom to Alaska.  

Republican President Donald Trump’s tariff wars could be the catalyst to developing the $44 billion mega project.  

Trump is prioritizing leveling trade deficits with other countries and his weapon of choice is raising tariffs — tariffs that could cripple the economies of other nations that depend on heavy exports to the U.S. 

This week, the president announced both Japan and South Korea have renewed interest in importing natural gas from Alaska. 

“Japan, South Korea and other nations want to be our partner, with investments of trillions of dollars each,” said Trump, during his address to a joint session of Congress.

Currently, the United States has a $68 billion trade deficit with Japan. America has a $70 billion trade deficit with South Korea. Our trade deficit with South Korea grew by a third in 2024. With Japan, it grew by 13% since 2021.

This does not sit well with the president. 

And since Japan’s tariffs on goods imported from  the U.S. are typically double of what our country charges, Trump wants to level the playing field. 

Trump says South Korea’s tariffs on U.S. imports are on average four times of what we charge. 

“Countless other nations charge us tremendously higher tariffs than we charge them. It’s very unfair,” said Trump. 

Analysts say Trump’s laser focus on leveling tariffs has motivated countries like Japan and South Korea to find new ways to lower their trade deficit with the US in hopes the president will reconsider making them a victim of his tariff war.  

This is where the Alaska gas pipeline comes in. 

If South Korea and Japan agree to import natural gas from the Alaska pipeline mega project, it would help lower the two nation’s trade deficits with the US.

Reuters reports Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said on Wednesday expanding American gas imports would meet the national interests of both Japan and the US as it would stabilize Japan’s energy supply while reducing the U.S. trade deficit.

Japan’s trade minister will visit Washington this month seeking exemptions from Trump’s tariffs using the prospect of importing more natural gas from the US as a bargaining tool. 

Trump on Tuesday during his address to the nation made it clear he’s bullish on the prospect of the building of Alaska’s gas pipeline. 

“My administration is working on a gigantic natural gas pipeline in Alaska, among the largest in the world, where Japan, South Korea and other nations want to be our partner with investments of trillions of dollars each,” said Trump. “There’s never been anything like that one. It will be truly spectacular. It’s all set to go. The permitting is gotten.”

Alaska legacy media outlets like the Anchorage Daily News, Alaska’s News Source, and Alaska Public Media have all downplayed the possibility of Trump kickstarting the state’s gas pipeline. 

But Trump has built a consistent record of accomplishing the things he promises, especially during his second term. It’s no secret the default position of Alaska’s legacy media, especially the Anchorage Daily News, is to doubt, demonize, and attack Trump.  

But US Sen. Dan Sullivan and Gov. Mike Dunleavy, both Republicans, hold a different view. Sullivan says it was a big deal the president mentioned the Alaska pipeline during his national address on Tuesday. 

“People have always been naysayers,” said Sullivan. “Gov. Dunleavy and I worked this really hard to encourage the president and his team to put it in the State of the Union. They did. That was a huge win for us.”

If there’s one thing Trump has a talent for it’s making the most of leverage. And the leverage generated from his threat of the use of tariffs could very well be the final piece of the puzzle that brings about the long dreamed of Alaska natural gas pipeline. 

Dan Fagan reports for Must Read Alaska. He’s covered Alaska politics for close to 30 years. He currently hosts a morning drive radio talk show on 1020 am 92.5 and 104.5 fm on KVNT. For news tips, email Dan at [email protected]

Linda Boyle: Biden awarded $28 million to a vaccine company that doesn’t have a web page and operates out of post office box

By LINDA BOYLE

It’s amazing to discover that various companies were awarded taxpayer dollars just as former President Joe Biden was going out the door.  

One that caught my eye was the $28 million awarded to a start-up company that doesn’t even have a web page. And on its grant application, it listed a Maryland post office box.  

The National Institutes of Health provided this grant to a venture-backed company called Vaccine Company Inc. The grant’s purpose was to develop flaviviruses vaccines to combat viruses that include West Nile, dengue, and Zika viruses. 

NIH’s Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health selected Vaccine Company along with three university sites (La Jolla Institute for Immunology, University of Washington, Vanderbilt University) to develop a more robust platform for vaccine development. The goal is to target more than one specific virus at a time—develop vaccines for a family of viruses, such as flaviviruses in the case of Vaccine Company, Inc.  

The selected company was to “focus on predictive modeling and machine learning tools to design proteins that can act as broadly effective antigens.” The goal of this research was to identify the protein structures of viruses so to be able to create “more broadly effective, safe, and accessible vaccines.” So, if a new virus in that family of viruses emerges, it will be easier to create a vaccine for it.  

That certainly is a laudable goal. Research in that area may be good for humanity. It is the kind of research that needs to be done by experts in the field. It is hoped this research could also lead to advancements in the treatment of cancer. 

Enter Vaccine Company. This is a new biomedical firm was established in 2022. Its chief financial officer was one of Biden’s top Covid advisors. In researching its location, it gives one P.O. box address in Bethesda Maryland, one in Chicago, and one in California. 

There is no company web page to explain how these sites are linked together and even if  they are. And there are three different home bases in their business registration filings. 

Further intrigue exists. Nowhere can I find exactly who makes up the board of directors. There is a lot of mystery surrounding this organization. I do know it has already spent $2 million of its grant funds—but I can’t tell you on what.  

All  this information became public when Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst urged Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. to investigate why this startup company with no history of accomplishments but with connections to Biden received this grant. Ernst further suggested RFK Jr. claw back any amount still unspent, if the grant was found to have been given inappropriately. 

Ernst told the Free Beacon“From listing its mailing address as a P.O. box to being run by former Biden staffers, there are alarm bells going off as to how and why Vaccine Company, Inc. was awarded a lucrative government contract. Unfortunately, there are more questions than answers because everything this company does is shrouded in mystery. It should not be this hard to figure out where $28 million in tax dollars are going. The American people deserve to know.” 

Ernst has given HHS until 17 March to finish its investigation. It will be interesting to see what comes out. How was VCI vetted? Where is it located? Who is involved? Was it given as a political favor? Where is the truth?   

It’s well past time to connect the dots to many of our federal grants and contracts.

Linda Boyle, RN, MSN, DM, was formerly the chief nurse for the 3rd Medical Group, JBER, and was the interim director of the Alaska VA. Most recently, she served as Director for Central Alabama VA Healthcare System. She is the director of the Alaska Covid Alliance/Alaskans 4 Personal Freedom.

House Republicans wear out Speaker Edgmon’s nerves, as Democrats call for a short work week

The Alaska House Democrats wanted to have a 3-1/2 day week. They planned on being on the midday flight back to Anchorage on Thursday and the Republicans of the House were getting in their way.

Speaker Bryce Edgmon was clearly having trouble holding together the Democrat-led majority because Rep. Maxine Dibert of Fairbanks was out for an extended period as she recovered from a serious illness. She was present on Thursday, sitting in the back and on an oxygen tank.

Meanwhile, House Republicans went long in their introductions of guests, putting the plans of the Democrats to hightail it out of Juneau at risk.

That finally irritated Speaker Bryce Edgmon who got chippy with the minority, asking sarcastically at one point “how many more staff do we have to introduce?”

Rep. Will Stapp, a colorful member of the Republican minority, then waxed at length about one of his staff members, until he was cut off by the speaker, who became increasingly irritable with the minority members. Watch it here:

This clip from Thursday’s floor session gives a sense of how it went before Speaker Bryce Edgmon pulled the plug.

In the middle of of the multiple “at eases,” Edgmon could be seen raising his voice at Minority Leader Mia Costello, he ordered Rep. Dan Saddler to “stand down, Rep. Saddler.”

Saddler refused, calling a point of order.

“This is not a debatable motion. I asked you to stand down,” Edgmon said sternly. “I am not going to be the presiding officer over a chamber that plays games.”

Watch as Edgmon loses his temper at the Republicans:

The remainder of the session on Thursday ended up being extended “at eases” sprinkled with Edgmon lecturing the minority.

Then, Edgmon turned to Majority Leader Chuck Kopp and said, “in deference to order and decorum on the floor, and not be obfuscating the action that we had hoped to take today, I ask for you to make a motion.”

Kopp motioned that the body adjourn until Monday. The Democrats all made their flights back to Anchorage after having put in only a half week of work.

Going rogue: British Columbia threatens tariffs on Alaska-bound trucked goods

British Columbia Premier David Eby announced new legislation that would impose fees on U.S. commercial trucks transiting through the province to Alaska. The move is part of BC’s response to the economic threats posed by newly imposed US tariffs on Canadian goods.

Speaking in front of the BC’s Legislative Assembly on Thursday, where a large Canadian flag was displayed for the occasion, Eby emphasized his government’s commitment to standing firm against President Donald Trump’s trade pressures.

“Trump thinks he can bring us to our knees by threatening tariffs,” Eby said. “What he is seeing is that Canadians are standing tall.”

The Trump Administration imposed a 25% tariff on Canadian goods and a 10 per cent tariff on Canadian energy as of midnight Tuesday. However, just before Eby’s announcement, the White House signaled a partial, one-month reprieve on some Canadian imports that comply with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico trade agreement.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy issued a statement in response: “My hope is that the federal governments between our two great countries work out solutions to the tariff issues, and provincial and state governments refrain from making unilateral decisions that may have negative consequences that negatively impact discussions at the federal level as they find solutions.”

The proposed legislation by Eby will be introduced in the legislature in the coming days. It will mean:

  • Tolls and fees on US commercial trucks traveling through BC to Alaska.
  • A mandate that all low-carbon fuel additives used in gasoline and diesel in the province be sourced from Canada.
  • The prioritization of domestic producers in government procurement, ensuring Crown corporations favor BC and Canadian suppliers.

“We will never again put ourselves in the position of being so dependent on the United States,” Eby said. “We need to structurally change the way we do business within the country.”

The BC government has already taken steps to boycott products from US states controlled by Trump’s Republican party, removing certain liquors from provincial liquor store shelves. Eby indicated that these products will remain banned until the tariff threats are fully lifted.

“My inclination is, no, the products stay off the shelf,” Eby said. “They’re not going back on the shelf until the threat is gone, and our actions and our responses will not stop until the threat is gone.”

These measures are part of a larger national response from Canada. Federal Finance Minister Dominic Leblanc announced that Canada’s planned second round of retaliatory tariffs on $125 billion worth of U.S. goods has been delayed until April 2, following the White House’s temporary easing of some tariffs.

Eby characterized the US trade policies as an “unprecedented attack” on Canadian economic interests.

“The White House started a trade war we didn’t want, and we must answer with strength,” he said. “We are responding with several targeted measures, and in the coming weeks, we will arm ourselves with even more tools to fend off sustained economic aggression.”

Listen to the news conference at this link:

Win Gruening: Hidden perils of returning to a defined pension plan for public employees

By WIN GRUENING

As Alaska faces one of its most difficult fiscal challenges in decades, a bill to radically expand Alaska’s retirement plan for government workers is winding its way through the Alaska State Legislature.

House Bill 78 would reinstitute an option for a defined benefit retirement system similar to one the State discontinued almost 20 years ago. Current employees could convert to the new system and new employees would automatically be enrolled.

Proponents of the bill claim that a defined benefit plan will reduce employee turnover and would cost no more than the defined contribution plan currently in place.

Opponents argue that there are still billions in unfunded liabilities from the previous plan, and many government employees prioritize other factors over a pension plan.

This ongoing debate reflects differences in how this change would potentially impact employee retention, retirement security, and state finances.

Alaska’s history in wrestling with this issue indicates that there is a huge financial risk in returning to a defined benefit plan. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that it would improve employee retention.

In 2006, the State of Alaska moved from a defined benefits pension retirement plan (DB) for state and municipal employees to a 401(k)-style defined contribution plan (DC). The two plans affected were the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) and the Teachers Retirement System (TRS).

It became obvious the plans were unsustainable over the long term after chronic underfunding and inaccurate actuarial estimates led to a massive deficit. 

Today, even after the cancellation of the 2006 DB pension program, over 65,000 state and municipal employees still receive benefits under the program (75% of whom are retired). With payments peaking in 2037 at $2.2 billion, significant financial obligations will remain for at least another 50 years.

Despite the State’s best efforts, the deficit in the retirement trust funds has been remarkably stubborn and difficult to resolve. Since 2015, the State has pumped an additional $5 billion into PERS and TRS but the unfunded liability has risen from $6 billion to $7.5 billion today. (This doesn’t include healthcare benefit plans which are accounted for under a different trust arrangement and are now well-funded).

The Alaska Division of Retirement and Benefits projects that another $3.8 billion will need to be injected into TRS/PERS over the next 14 years to cover future liability.

What HB78 proponents cannot answer is how the State can reactivate a similar retirement system (albeit with some risk mitigation measures), without any additional cost if we are struggling to maintain a system that ended decades ago. Legislative leaders are waiting for an actuarial analysis reflecting plan affordability before moving the bill out of committee.

Cost aside, HB78 boosters insist this is the only way to improve employee morale, stem employee turnover, and meet employees’ needs for retirement security.

In fact, Alaska seems to be retaining public employees better than most other states. According to publicly available information, Alaska’s public employee turnover rate is 18%, typical and lower than that of several states offering defined benefit pensions, including Texas (23%), Utah (28%), and Kansas (23%).

Despite dire predictions, teacher retention remained largely flat after 2006 and has continued to remain below the national average.

survey conducted for the Alaska Department of Education in 2021 clearly showed that teachers ranked compensation, workplace conditions, and personal connections with students higher than retirement benefits.

Employers now recognize that for a younger generation of workers, it isn’t uncommon to frequently change jobs and consider compensation a higher priority. Unfortunately, defined benefit plans do not provide portability, meaning employees may forfeit retirement benefits when changing employers or moving to a different state. Portability is often considered more valuable than a traditional plan that requires employees to work for the same employer for 30 years to get full benefits.

The State should be extremely cautious in returning to an outdated retirement model that has proven to be perilous in the past and once again may be unsustainable and burden Alaskans for generations to come.

After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening became a regular opinion page columnist for the Juneau Empire. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations.

Double standard: House minority cut from Finance subcommittees, while Dems let their own slide in and vote

The Democrat majority in the Alaska House of Representatives has told the Republican minority to sit down and shut up. They make the rules to advantage the Democrats.

House Republicans who were assigned to serve on Finance subcommittees as assigned Finance members are not allowed to sit at the table with the voting members of the subcommittee and are not allowed to speak. They can only watch the proceedings — essentially giving them no role at all.

However, when Rep. Andy Josephson took over for Rep. Bryce Edgmon during Thursday’s subcommittee meeting on the Department of Environmental Conservation’s budget, he was allowed to sit in as a voting member, since Edgmon was trying to leave town. Josephson is in the Democrat majority, but not on the subcommittee. It’s a rule violation that was brought to the attention of the committee by Rep. George Rauscher, who said he had never seen that done before — the plug-and-play of a legislator who was not a voting member of the subcommittee.

Watch the committee meeting here as the double-standard is revealed by Rauscher:

The rule that co-chair Rep. Sara Hannan cited allows the majority to, indeed, slide in any of its Finance Committee members if there is an absence on a subcommittee of a member of the majority. That way the Democrats can ensure that no alternate Republicans will ever be allowed to sit at the table.

Video: Mat-Su Borough Assembly to consider resolution in support of Yundt Tax

11

The Mat-Su Borough Assembly, without once consulting with the resource development business community or tax experts, is considering a resolution that supports a tax singling out one American-owned oil company: Hilcorp, the company that is pouring millions of dollars in investment into the North Slope.

The Yundt Tax, a new approach to Alaska tax policy that targets one business, is the brainchild of Democrat Sen. Bill Wielechowski, but is being sponsored by Wasilla Republican Sen. Rob Yundt. It is at attempt to ratchet up the income tax on the company that took over BP’s operations on the North Slope at a time when BP was struggling to make Prudhoe Bay investments profitable. Since taking over, Hilcorp has remitted taxes that far exceeded state projections for Prudhoe Bay per-barrel tax and royalties:

The MatSu Borough Assembly has many ties to Sen. Yundt, who served on the Assembly until leaving for Juneau.

Maxwell Sumner, who took Yundt’s place on the Assembly after Yundt went to the Senate, is the brother of former Rep. Jesse Sumner, who is believed to be supporting the Yundt Tax. Sumner and Yundt are close friends.

Dee McKee, who has served on the Assembly for years, is the mother of Yundt’s chief of staff, Ryan McKee. She will likely have to recuse herself from voting on the matter when she returns from medical leave.

Stephanie Nowers, who recused herself on Tuesday because her husband’s company works with the company she said would be impacted, also serves on the Assembly.

The matter was sneaked onto the Assembly’s consent agenda, but Assemblyman Bill Gamble asked that it be pulled from the agenda because he felt he needs to study the matter further, since oil tax law is complicated. Some members were not in attendance, including Assemblywoman McKee.

Consent agenda items are supposed to be for noncontroversial items. But there’s little legislation in front of the Legislature this year that is more controversial than the Yundt Tax.

Assemblyman Ron Bernier read from notes that appeared to have been provided him by Sen. Yundt’s office, advocating for the tax, and what he read had significant misinformation contained in it. He proceeded to argue for the resolution, even though the actual motion on the table was to simply move the item to the March 18 regular agenda.

Bernier said Hilcorp pays no tax to the state, when it, in fact, pays hefty production tax and royalties, just not income tax. Then Bernier got some more notes sent to him and started reading them, continuing his argument, and the notes claimed that in 2021 the governor supported similar legislation, which he did not disclose was part of a separate major tax restructuring with multiple facets to it. He was falsely asserting that Hilcorp pays no taxes to the state. That is true, and 11,000 other S corporations do not pay income tax. It’s not a loophole — it’s the law.

In the end, the controversial resolution was pulled from the consent agenda and is now on the March 18 agenda.

Watch what happened in this video clip:

In the MatSu Borough, both House District 28 Republicans and the Valley Republican Women of Alaska have passed resolutions opposing the Yundt Tax.

Yundt is supported by legislative Democrats led by Sen. Wielechowski, who has been trying to get higher taxes on oil companies for his entire legislative career.

It’s unclear how much the extra tax on Hilcorp might gain for the state — or whether it could actually cost the state. The analysis has not been done. It may be that if the tax is enacted, Hilcorp will then ask for certain benefits in its Cook Inlet leases, which it now does not get but that other companies do get. The company could use the same equity argument that Sen. Yundt is offering, which says that all companies are the same and must be treated equally.

Yundt represents the district in Alaska that had the highest no vote on the last ballot initiative to raise taxes on oil companies. In 2020, his district voted 74% against the oil tax ginned up by Democrats and lawyer Robin Brena.

Murkowski attacks Trump over USAID cuts

58

Sen. Lisa Murkowski went on the attack again on Thursday, this time reproaching the Trump Administration for its cuts to the notorious program USAID. The program is known for humanitarian assistance, but is also believed to have served as a funnel for CIA operations overseas. During the Biden Administration, USAID spent $1.5 million to advance DEI initiatives in Serbia and $3.2 million last year to a subsidiary of BBC, BBC Media Action.

“This week, I met with some Alaskan USAID employees. They not only informed me of the confusing and callous handling of personnel matters by OPM and DOGE, but they also painted an incredibly troubling picture of what the world looks like without humanitarian assistance from the United States,” Murkowski said. “Although I support measures to find inefficiencies within the agency, USAID’s mission to keep people healthy and safe in even the most remote corners of the world should not be eliminated. Dr. Peter Kerndt, an Alaskan physician who has dedicated his career to treating tuberculosis in Alaska and around the world, shared with me, ‘America is great, because America is good.’ It is imperative we not lose sight of that,” Murkowski said.

Taxpayer funding for USAID had ballooned under the Biden Administration, from $26 billion in 2019 to $42.4 billion in 2023. Check the official numbers here.

In 2024, Mexico received over $58 million in USAID funding, and Guatemala received $189 million. USAID gave Venezuela $211 million and funneled $61 billion to Ukraine. Syria, which has been on the State Department’s list of terrorist states, received $512 million in USAID funds.

The US debt stands at nearly $36 trillion. For each American man, woman, and child, that’s $108,000 in debt owed to other countries. But for every actual American taxpayer, it’s over $323,000 owed.

The Trump Administration’s Department of Government Efficiency has thus far saved taxpayers about $170 billion, according to USDebtClock.org

Murkowski is upping her social media activity as she prepares to release her memoirs in June, titled “Far From Home.” She is positioning herself as the anti-Trump, anti-DOGE Republican in the Senate in a way she has not done in the past, siding with the president of Ukraine against Trump in the middle of a sensitive negotiation earlier this year.