By WIN GRUENING
Based on the deluge of comments on social media, recent proposals by the City and Borough of Juneau to dramatically escalate debt and utility rates, and increase the property tax millage rate have struck a nerve with Juneau taxpayers. Until now, the unchecked spending by the city assembly for several discretionary projects and initiatives, some having been rejected by voters, has largely been tolerated.
Millions of dollars have been sequestered or spent for mail-in voting, proposed city offices and a palatial new arts and culture “civic” center, all allowed to proceed with scant attention paid to public process.
With the city facing flood mitigation expenses, declining school funding, and a looming backlog of deferred maintenance, the public is realizing that Juneau city government is spending beyond its means.
If raising taxes, piling on more debt, and increasing rates for city services are the only solution the Assembly is willing to consider, community affordability will continue to suffer and seniors on fixed incomes and working-class families will leave for less expensive places to live.
Residents left behind will be saddled with an ever-increasing share of taxes and fees spread across a dwindling population.
Pumping more government money into the economy isn’t the answer. It rarely creates durable jobs and is subject to the whims of government bureaucrats and elected officials.
Growing the economy by creating permanent jobs and expanding Juneau’s tax base are the province of the private sector. Government’s role in fostering economic growth is to keep taxes low, cut bureaucracy, and generally make it easier to design and develop revenue-producing projects.
While mail-in-voting, city offices and a civic center have been excused from scrutiny and transparency, Aak’w Landing, a proposed new cruise ship terminal and uplands development in the downtown subport area, has undergone the most rigorous and demanding public process in recent Juneau history.
The $150-200-million project has languished for years, facing a never-ending array of bureaucratic challenges and delays to reach a point where the Assembly can make a final decision on a necessary tidelands permit.
The private project includes a welcome center, retail and dining options, a public park, underground parking, and an Indigenous Knowledge, Science, and Cultural Center.
A comprehensive and collaborative public process stretching over five years has incorporated input from the Planning Commission, Visitor Industry Task Force, city planners, and annual surveys of Juneau residents. Most recently, public open houses attended by hundreds of residents were held by city officials to explain the project and answer questions.
Project opposition has largely come from a handful of cruise industry activists who have promoted anti-cruise ballot initiatives, filed lawsuits, and attempted to delay approval of this project by whatever means necessary.
None of Juneau’s other four docks (two that are city-owned) received a fraction of the attention when constructed. This, despite the fact cruise ship numbers increased as a result and, due to their concentrated location, these docks have unavoidably contributed to general congestion.
The Aak’w Landing project, in contrast, will be located away from the center of the current dock area and will help disperse cruise passengers more evenly. Importantly, the addition of this dock will not increase the number of ships visiting Juneau. The city and the cruise industry have negotiated a limit on cruise passengers along with a 5-ship daily limit which caps additional cruise traffic within the borough, regardless of the number of docks.
The project’s economic benefits are substantial: 80+ construction jobs, 90+ summer jobs, 20+ year-round jobs, and increased property and sales tax revenue generated by hundreds of millions of dollars of real estate improvements and retail transactions.
The anti-cruise crowd has dismissed the project’s economic benefits and ignored the environmental benefits: eliminating thousands of buses from congested downtown streets, adding over 100 covered parking spaces downtown, reducing emissions from lightering vessels and cruise ships at anchor, and increasing cruise ship use of shore power, which in turn reduces residents’ utility bills.
Project approval will signal to other industries Juneau’s willingness to consider economic growth as a vital component of community affordability. The project will actually mitigate cruise industry impacts and reduce the city’s reliance on property tax millage rate increases.
That’s how to start making Juneau affordable again.
After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening became a regular opinion page columnist for the Juneau Empire. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations.
The basic and simple solution is to cut the waste and grift from city expenditures. That takes true conservative leadership and foresight, a major – key component missing from many our major cities in AK907. Absent true conservative leadership, folks will simply gravitate elsewhere and most likely outside of AK907.
Make Juneau great again by ending its Alice in Wonderland entitlement, borne through Alaskan communities subject to their rule. Juneau was established via market forces at the time searching for new opportunities in the North. Today it is a modern-day ghetto where entitlement feeds off the souls of success throughout the rest of the state. My message, enough of Juneau! It is time to move the capital to a place where more Alaskans can access it, and observe the corruption firsthand. I concede it is an ideal hiding space for the public sector unions to perform their witchcraft and deceptions. And at what cost to the rest of Alaska will making Juneau affordable be? More sleight of hand and Three-card Monte. When will The Walking Dead awake?
Be carefull what you wish for.
A very nice article. It touches the high points. Hopefully our Assembly see the sense of it.
Thanks Win!!
Juneau is a case study in how money is misspent and wasted. Millions have been spent on buildings, a huge whale statue that never worked, an electric bus that never worked (Proterra went BK so now it sits as junk), a gondola that was shipped from Europe and sits on the side of the road, and many other maladies. Up go the property taxes to pay it, all in the name of equity and equality.
Win, Juneau’ s future will be bright but only if she returns to her past.
MINING!
A better idea would be to move the seat of government to Anchorage and abandon Juneau to the few politicians that have become wealthy feeding off of the real estate problems unique to the area. Be that as it may even when Juneau is coddled in the arms of artifice it can’t seem to pay for itself and splattering more money into that mess won’t fix anything.
as I said above, Be carefull what you wish for.
They should figure something out because as a resident who has been deprived of the ability to visit the capital of my state, I would prefer that we actually take the action of moving the capital to Willow as voted upon YEARS ago. I understand that will need funding, but I’m betting we’ll be producing that soon enough. No new buildings in Juneau for government. Put them in Willow. Alaskans deserve to have access to their government and not have to pay exorbitant travel and per diem.
As I say, be careful what you wish for
Manda,
Old Bob Atwood began beating the Capital Move Drum back in 1959. His solution for the New Capital was to place it in Gulkana. Why Gulkana? Well, because it was an equal distance from Anchorage and Fairbanks. Willow is way too close to the commie rat infested place of my birth known as Anchorage. Sooo, go ahead and move the damn thing but please keep the Disease of Government far away from the beautiful Susitna Valley.
I have an idea, let us build the road out of Juneau first, then build the new Capital in Tok or Gulkana!
As Walter J. Hickel said in 1966, “let’s stop talking about moving the Capitol! instead let’s get the Capital Moving!” (or similar words to that effect)
It is almost as if the Juneau and Anchorage assemblies were sitting in planning meetings together. Or is it the tax-and-spend mental disease that infects most (D)emocrats? Reducing spending is a good start. Overwhelming the problem with income derived from commerce is another. There’s a mental cancer in Juneau. It’s nice to see Mr. Gruening cut through some of their diseased thinking.
Our big three cities are all run by democrat, the only way they know how to make things cheaper is to steal from one group and give it to another, after taking their cut of course. Elections have consequences!