Sunday, August 24, 2025
Home Blog Page 1531

Celebrate your Alaskan Fourth of July

0

A MOMENT TO CONSIDER HISTORY

As Alaskans, we treasure our uniqueness along with the common history that defines all Americans.  We see ourselves as self-reliant, independent people with an intense pride of our state and country.

The history of Alaska and the history of America have similarities that are often forgotten amid the festivities surrounding the celebration of one of our most popular national holidays.

While July 4, 1776 is important as the date on which our country declared its independence, it was over a decade before America’s future was assured.  Some historians believe that was when our national constitution was drafted from May 25 to September 17, 1787, in the old Pennsylvania State House in Philadelphia (where our original Declaration of Independence was adopted – now known as Independence Hall).

Up to then, the nearly four million inhabitants of the new United States were governed under the Articles of Confederation, created by the Second Continental Congress and ratified by the original 13 states in the five years following independence.

Win Gruening

Unfortunately, the chronically underfunded and weak Confederation government was inadequate for resolving conflicts that arose among the states.  The Articles of Confederation could only be amended by unanimous vote of the states, so each state had effective veto power over any proposed changes. In addition, the Articles did not provide the federal government taxing power, being entirely dependent on the states for funding with no power to enforce collection.

Initially, while the Philadelphia Constitutional Convention was intended to revise the Articles of Confederation, many of its proponents felt, in order for our nation to progress, delegates needed to create a new government rather than patch up the existing one.

Under similar circumstances, on November 8, 1955, Alaska’s 55 delegates felt a sense of hope tinged with uncertainty when they gathered at the University of Alaska’s Constitution Hall in Fairbanks for Alaska’s first constitutional convention.  The number 55 was no accident – the same number in attendance at the Philadelphia Convention in 1787.

In Philadelphia, delegates unanimously chose George Washington president of the Convention – who later became our first president of the United States.

In Fairbanks, delegates chose territorial senator, Bill Egan, to lead them.  He was later elected as the first governor of Alaska after statehood was achieved in 1959.

While the Philadelphia convention delegates sweltered in hot summer temperatures, Fairbanks delegates faced a different challenge.  During their proceedings, Bill Egan announced that “the temperature is now about forty below and if the delegates have their cars out there, they probably should start them in order that they will start.”

By avoiding minutiae and hyperbole, Alaska delegates were able to draft a short, general document, modeled after the U.S. Constitution. Rather than an elaborate document like many other state constitutions, they chose instead to leave broad authority to future state legislatures. The resulting document is thus only half the average state constitution length of 26,000 words.

Much like the U.S. Constitution’s correction of shortcomings in the Articles of Confederation, language in Alaska’s constitution was a reaction against weak territorial institutions and therefore provided for a strong executive and legislature.

Both documents’ preambles begin with the same words, “We the people…”, signifying the foundation of our system of government where citizen’s rights and privacy are paramount, and it is only through the people that government power is derived.

Despite the importance of our U.S. Constitution (including the first 10 amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights) it is July Fourth – Independence Day – that later became the official national holiday Americans celebrate each year.

For Alaskans, this date also has special significance. President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed the proclamation admitting Alaska as the 49th state on January 3, 1959, but, by executive order, the new national flag did not become official until July 4th of that year.

On that day, an estimated 3,000 people stood at attention as the first 49-star flag was raised slowly in the state capital by a military honor guard in an impressive ceremony.

In the world of nations, there is only one America.  And among the 50 states, Alaska’s statehood story is unique in terms of its origin and character.

Happy 4thof July!

Win Gruening retired as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in 2012. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is active in community affairs as a 30-plus year member of Juneau Downtown Rotary Club and has been involved in various local and statewide organizations.

Interior Dept. withdraws opinion on Alaska Native ‘land into trust’

ALASKA ‘INDIAN RESERVATION’ STATUS ON ICE FOR NOW

The U.S. Department of the Interior’s solicitor said Friday that it has withdrawn an 11th-hour Obama-era opinion that allowed the federal government to take land into trust for Alaska Natives.

The rule, made in the last few days of the Obama Administration, was “incomplete and unbalanced,” said the department’s acting solicitor, Daniel H. Jorjani. He said the department needs at least a year to reconsider it.

The Obama ruling was made on Jan. 13, 2017, by former DOI solicitor Hilary Tomkins, just before President Donald Trump was sworn into office. It was part of a flurry of last-ditch rulings of an administration set on “fundamentally transforming America,” as the president had promised.

Tomkins had issued opinion M-37043, an analysis of the effects of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act, the Federal Land Policy and Management Act, and the Supreme Court decision in Carcieri v. Salazar on the Secretary of the lnterior’s authority to accept land in trust in Alaska under the Indian Reorganization Act. It’s a complicated matter of Indian law that goes back as far as the 1930s.

Within days of the Tomkins decision, a tiny acre of land in downtown Craig, Alaska, became the toehold case to establish Indian Country in Alaska, essentially allowing the federal government to take land into trust for the Craig Tribal Association, and manage it as it does Native American reservations in the Lower 48. Its application was accepted by the Obama Administration immediately on Jan. 14, 2017.

Historically, Alaska has been an exception to the Indian Country style of federal management because of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act and its creation of Native corporations for regions and villages throughout the state. Native corporations are designed to be run as profit-making corporate enterprises for the benefit of Alaska Native people, with the intent that they would be generally run by Natives. Today, most of the corporate jobs in Alaska Native corporations are indeed held by Natives and they are some of the largest corporate entities in the state.

[Read: One acre is newest reservation in Alaska.]

Upon being sworn into office, President Trump asked for a review of all of the last-minute actions of the Obama Administration. On Jan. 20. 2017, the president’s chief of staff announced a regulatory review process for any new or pending regulations.

The new solicitor general for DOI concluded that the previous decision omitted the discussion of important statutory developments, resulting in “an incomplete analysis of the Secretary’s authority to acquire land in trust in Alaska.”

[Read: The entire DOI solicitor’s opinion here.]

BACKGROUND

In 2006, four Alaska Native tribes and one Alaska Native person challenged the “Alaska exception” from Indian Country in a case called Akiachak Native Community v. Jewell.

The groups argued that the Alaska exception discriminated against Alaska Natives by prohibiting them from placing land in trust status.

In 2016, the D.C. District Court agreed with the tribes and held the Alaska exception to be void and unenforceable because it violated a law prohibiting regulations that diminish any privileges for Alaska Natives that other Native American tribes enjoy.

The Akiachak Case was widely considered the first step toward a tribal reservation systems known in the Lower 48 as “Indian Country.” Alaska has, since 1971, had an ANCSA exception to Indian Country, with no reservation land left except Metlakatla. The complete inventory of Alaska’s prior reservation status is here.

With reservation status, management of fish and game resources becomes complex and law enforcement jurisdictions become contentious. The self-governed reservations cannot be taxed or regulated by the state. They are sovereign. Tribal members and business entities would become exempt from state laws on marijuana, gaming, alcohol, tobacco, fireworks, or anything else that is regulated. Alaskans would also lose access to historic trails that still being contested with the federal government.

Mary Bishop of the Alaska Outdoor Council explained the challenges of Indian Country in Alaska more fully in an opinion that appeared in the Fairbanks NewsMiner. 

[Read: More Indian Country ahead – in Juneau this time]

But for now, Indian Country in Alaska is on the back burner, pending further legal analysis by Trump’s Department of the Interior.

Gasline Corp. launches cheerleading squad

UNIONS JOIN, BUT INDUSTRY GROUPS HOLD BACK, LOOKING FOR SPECIFICS

Last month, the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation rolled out a new entity to polish its brand: the Alaska Gasline Coalition, it’s called.

The initial members of the coalition include unions, quasi-governmental agencies, and regional groups with a dog in the fight: Alaska AFL-CIO, Alaska Laborers, Anchorage Economic Development Corporation, Arctic Slope Regional Corporation, Calista Corporation, Construction Industry Progress Fund, Kenai Peninsula Builders Association, Kenai Peninsula Economic Development District, National Electrical Contractors Association – Alaska, and the Soldotna Chamber of Commerce.

The coalition’s purpose is to support the Alaska Gasline Development Corporation’s Alaska LNG project.

Missing from the cheering squad is the Alaska Chamber of Commerce, the Anchorage Chamber of Commerce, the Juneau Chamber of Commerce, and the Fairbanks Chamber of Commerce. Also not on the list is the Alaska Oil and Gas Association, the Associated General Contractors, the Alaska Support Industry Alliance and the Resource Development Council.

Why are the actual industry leaders not climbing on board the coalition to support the gasline?

They say it’s because they don’t know what the project actually is, how it will be paid for, and which entity will control it. While Alaskans generally want to monetize the state’s abundant natural gas, they are not aligned with Gov. Bill Walker on a deal with China at any cost.

The gasline, which Gov. Bill Walker claimed was not transparent under Gov. Sean Parnell, is an especially secretive project now. During the 2018 session of the Alaska Legislature, there was a lot of discussion about receipt authority that would allow AGDC to borrow billions of dollars, but there were no hearings about the project itself. The basic business decisions have not been revealed.

PROJECT MOVING FASTER, RUNNING SHORT OF TIME

Last month the governor attended another ‘world gas conference,” this time in Washington, D.C., with AGDC President Keith Meyer and with the governor’s communication director and deputy chief of staff Grace Jang.

Jang has been embedded at AGDC for several weeks, sources have told Must Read Alaska. Since Jang’s arrival, AGDC’s vice president for communications, Rosetta Alcantra, left the organization suddenly, just as the governor is closing in on a deal with Sinopec, the China Petrochemical Corporation, with which he signed a nonbinding joint development agreement in November to design, build, and operate Walker’s ambitious plan to commercialize the state’s gas.

Although much is not known, what the public has been told by Walker is that the Bank of China and China Investment Corporation would guarantee 75 percent of the funding, or about $32 billion to build the Alaska LNG project.

The state would, in exchange, promise China 75 percent of the gas for the life of the agreement. So far, this all is done via a memorandum of understanding, of which Walker has signed dozens in his 3.5 years as governor.

With his re-election prospects grim, the governor only has five months to finalize a binding agreement with the Chinese consortium of companies before either he wins another term of office or a new governor takes over.

With so little time left, Walker is trying to hasten the work on agreements with the Chinese entities. Over the next few weeks, insiders say Alaskans can expect to see a lot more Chinese officials in the state, where the governor is hoping to have discussions and signing ceremonies. Walker hopes to roll out a major announcement after the Aug. 21 primary election.

WHAT WOULD A BINDING AGREEMENT LOOK LIKE?

Some knowledgeable about the project worry that Walker is getting ready to sign a binding agreement laden with contingencies. Such an agreement could set forth conditions similar to the agreement Alaska had with TransCanada years ago, which the state had to pay handsomely to break. In 2015, Alaska paid TransCanada $65 million to get that company’s share of the project. Many thought that TransCanada let the state off easy.

The cautionary note being sounded is that Walker and Meyer are willing to sign away the first right of refusal for the next 10-20 years, giving China the right to build the gasline project, provide the steel and other components, and a future governor would be bound to that agreement, including the promised gas that would go into it. Even if the agreement was uneconomical and failed to proceed, Alaska would be on the hook to a foreign entity.

The Permanent Fund itself could be tapped if the project doesn’t pan out. Here’s how: With Gov. Walker so deeply involved in the formation of an agreement with China, the State can no longer claim that there is a clear separation between AGDC and the State itself.

China and other creditors could come after the Permanent Fund in the same way that creditors are going after former Alaska Dispatch News publisher Alice Rogoff, by claiming she had no separation between her businesses and her personal finances.

Such a lien on the Permanent Fund would only happen, of course, if costs were higher than expected and if the State of Alaska couldn’t break even.

Walker has so deeply engaged in the workings and agreements of AGDC, to the point of putting his deputy chief of staff inside the agency, that he has already “pierced the veil” that would keep the State of Alaska’s treasury off limits in court. Although AGDC has been designed as an independent agency that would protect the State, should something go wrong, Walker has not kept an “arm’s length” distance from the project, which AGDC president Keith Meyer claims will be turning dirt next year.

On July 11, some of this may be explained more fully in the Senate Natural Resources Committee, as Sen. Cathy Giessel, chair, convenes the quarterly review of the gasline agency’s work to date, its progress and commitments. That committee meeting starts at 9 a.m., and lawmakers will no doubt have many specific questions about the modeling and finances of the proposed gasline.

The cheerleading squad, “The Alaska Gasline Coalition,” hasn’t done much other than allow itself to be used as a publicity stunt. Its purpose was to simply provide some momentum to the project at a time when AGDC President Meyer has said quite publicly that he is done talking to the naysayers, and will engage only with people who support the project — whatever it is — from here on out. That means the Alaska Gasline Coalition is the group Meyer will be communicating with this year.

 

Subaru thefts are the new thing

1

PRISON SHIRTS FOR SIX WOMEN, ONE MAN AFTER VEHICLE HEISTS

Over the weekend, Anchorage police officers with the Patrol Division and detectives with Property Crimes Unit made seven arrests in connection with vehicle theft investigations.

They also issued a warning to car owners that thieves have started targeting older model Subarus.

Police arrested:

Chelsey Sallaffie, 24, who was booked for Vehicle Theft 1, Leaving the Scene of an Accident, Reckless Driving, Harassment 1, Assault 4, Theft 2, and Resisting Arrest.

On Friday at 3:15 p.m., officers were dispatched to the 3900 block of Oregon Dr. for a report of a reckless driver. During the traffic stop, officers discovered the vehicle was reported stolen.

Sallaffie

They took Sallaffie, the driver of the red Chevy pickup, in custody. Sallaffie was screaming and being uncooperative with officers while being detained. She was kicking at officers and spit in one officer’s face. Officers also discovered the she was wanted for a hit and run collision that occurred earlier that day at 5th Ave. & Cordova St. This is APD Case: 18-26117 and 18-26125.

Barce

Lydia Barce, 25, also known as Lydia Anne Payne Barce, was arrested for Vehicle Theft 1, Theft 2, and Theft 4. On Saturday, at around 3:30 a.m., officers with the Patrol Division were in the area of the 4600 block of Spenard Rd. when they observed a 1991 red Subaru Legacy in the parking lot of the Alex Hotel with Barce in the driver’s seat. The Subaru was reported stolen. This is APD Case: 18-25961

Waskey


Mary Waskey, 34, was arrested for Vehicle Theft 1 and Theft 2. On Saturday, at around 3:15 p.m., officers with the Patrol Division were dispatched to the 7500 block of Boundary Ave to recover a stolen 1999 green Subaru that was in Waskey’s possession. She was taken into custody. APD Case: 18-26158

Brooks

Gwendalyn Brooks, 30, was arrested for two counts of Vehicle Theft 1, two counts of Theft 2, Eluding, and Resisting Arrest. On Sunday, at around 1:50 p.m., officers with the Patrol Division ran a license plate of a 1987 gray Toyota pickup in the Airport Heights area and the vehicle was listed as stolen.

When a traffic stop attempt was made, the driver – later identified as Brooks – refused to pull over and kept driving. When officers finally stopped the vehicle, Brooks exited and started to run; she was apprehended and the passengers were called out of the truck.

Brooks was uncooperative when being questioned by police. She was taken into custody along with the other passengers. Through the investigation, there was enough evidence to confirm that Brooks had stolen another vehicle as well – a 2005 red Chevy pickup that had been reported stolen the day before. This is APD Case: 18- 25444 and 18-26226

Seton

Tashia Lee Seton, 27, was a passenger in the stolen gray pickup with Gwendalyn Brooks. She was found to be in possession of meth at the time of the incident. Seton was arrested for Misconduct Involving a Controlled Substance 2, Criminal Mischief 5, and an existing Misdemeanor Warrant for Fail to Appear. This is APD Case: 18-25444

Florence Giannini, 50, was also a passenger in the stolen gray pickup with Gwendalyn Brooks. Giannini was arrested for Criminal Mischief 5. This is APD Case: 18-25444

Artz

Joseph Artz, 31, was arrested for Vehicle Theft 1 and Theft 2. On Sunday at around 3:55 p.m., officers with the Patrol Division located a stolen vehicle in the Carrs parking lot  at 5600 Debarr Rd. The vehicle, a 2003 blue Toyota 4Runner, was unoccupied. When Artz returned to the vehicle, he was taken into custody. APD Case: 18-26395

Detectives have also discovered that car thieves are now targeting late 1990’s model Subarus. Criminals are shaving or filing down keys and using them to open the doors and start the vehicles.

Police provided this photo from the arrest of Lydia Barce in which multiple keys were found possibly connected to other investigations.

 

Dunleavy, Treadwell quotes on Hawkins exiting governor’s race

TWO CANDIDATES FOR GOVERNOR WEIGH IN

Treadwell

Mead Treadwell issued a statement regarding Scott Hawkins’ withdrawal from the governor’s race:

“Scott Hawkins is a good man, an accomplished business person, husband and father. Scott is someone, who like myself, genuinely cares about the future of Alaska. While he is leaving the raced,I encourage him to stay involved in building a sustainable future for our state, protecting the dividend and right-sizing the budget.   He has huge ideas and experience to offer.”

“Many of Scott’s supporters have already called to join our campaign. Scott’s departure leaves me as the only Republican candidate with real world business experience that will enable us to meet the challenge of creating jobs and growing Alaska’s economy. I believe that the August 21st primary presents Alaskans with a clear choice of direction for our state.

“My family and I wish Scott and his family the best for the future.”

Mike Dunleavy

Candidate Mike Dunleavy also issued a statement:

“Scott Hawkins is a good man with a beautiful family. I’ve enjoyed the time I’ve spent with him at campaign events over the past few months, learning more about his conservative principles and free-market solutions to Alaska’s challenges. While we were technically opponents, Scott unquestionably elevated the debate, laying out a positive vision for Alaska’s future− I found that Scott and I often agreed on more issues than we disagreed.”

“While I understand his reasons for exiting the race, I welcome Scott’s continued involvement in Alaska politics, supporting candidates who share his firmly held belief that Alaska’s best days are ahead of us. Rose and I will keep Scott in our prayers, but we remain optimistic that his tenacity paired with a supportive, loving family will ensure a quick return to full health.”

Hawkins drops governor’s race to focus on business, policy work

Scott Hawkins left the governor’s race today to focus on growing his business and advancing his policy work he did prior to entering the race. He filed for governor in September, but today said that when Mead Treadwell entered the race, the math didn’t work any longer.

Hawkins is the president of Advanced Supply Chain International LLC, an oilfield services company with work on the North Slope as well as internationally. He also founded “Alaska Wins,” a group that works to engage the private sector in promoting pro-business policies, economic development, fiscal solutions and general prosperity by educating Alaskans on important public policy issues.

“In the fall of 2017, I jumped into this race to make a difference and to win. I believe our message of fiscal responsibility, changing Juneau, and promoting conservative policies to attract good jobs and retain good people indeed made a difference,” he said.

“I’m proud that this campaign had a positive impact on the race,” Hawkins said. “But I have concluded that recent developments in the race, particularly the last-minute entry of Mead Treadwell, significantly diminished my ability to win the primary. I was looking forward to facing Sen. Mike Dunleavy, head-to-head. The two of us offered Republican primary voters different visions for Alaska as we engaged in a friendly, respectful airing of our ideas on the campaign trail. Mead’s entry into the race significantly complicated this contrast,” he said.

Hawkins is a fiscal conservative with deep experience in job creation and a belief that the private sector should be the basis for Alaska’s economy. He spoke against an income tax and in favor of reining in state spending. His relationship with Dunleavy has been cordial on the campaign trail and although polls favored Dunleavy, Hawkins won people over with his strong economic background.

He said he’d keep his options open for 2022: “Without doubt, I will be supporting the eventual Republican nominee. Alaska is at a crossroads, and there is simply too much at stake. There is far more that unites Mike, Mead and me than divides us. Four more years of Bill Walker or four years of Mark Begich will do nothing to improve Alaska’s jobs climate and fiscal plight. I would like to thank my volunteers and financial supporters from the bottom of my heart. Your financial contributions and the time you devoted volunteering for the campaign mean so much to me. This has been a team effort.

“And this effort is far from over. We will continue to build a movement for positive, conservative change in Alaska. So please stay tuned,” he said. “In the coming months, I will be launching a new effort to promote conservative policies and change in Alaska.”

Earlier this year he was diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and has undergone chemotherapy, which has brought optimistic reports. The cancer was caught early, Hawkins said, and he has a good chance of recovery.

Walker flips: Offers Juneau Superior Court judgeship to lower candidate

The Alaska Judicial Council recommended two people — criminal defense attorney Julie Willoughby or Juneau City Attorney Amy Mead — to be the next Juneau Superior Court judge, replacing Judge Louis James Menendez as he retires.

The Judicial Council was sending a clear message it wanted Willoughby.

But politics is funny business. And politics reared its head in the selection of the next Juneau judge.

Here’s what we know: The Judicial Council found Willoughby to be far-and-away the preferred candidate, and she had the highest score in the very intense judicial review process that candidates endure. In some cases, she earned a perfect 5.0 score from respondents.

The Alaska Judicial Council asks Alaska Bar Association members to evaluate applicants on six characteristics: Professional Competence, Integrity, Fairness, Judicial Temperament, Suitability of this Applicant’s Experience for this Vacancy, and Overall Rating for this Position. The rating scale ranged from Poor (1) to Excellent (5).

[Read the scores of the applicants here.]

Willoughby was the highest scoring in all categories, including temperament and experience. She had a 4.3 out of a possible 5, and the only candidate of the seven to get an overall score of higher than 4.0.

Mead, however, was down the list with the fourth-highest rating among candidates — 3.7. That is below applicants Kevin Andrew Higgins and Hanna Sebold, who both scored 3.9.

Gov. Bill Walker initially offered the judgeship to Willoughby. It was clear that the Judicial Council strongly preferred her and was only throwing Mead’s name in their to signal to the governor that Willoughby was their choice.

Then, someone got to the governor. Within 24 hours, he withdrew the offer from Willoughby, and called Mead to tell her she would be the next Superior Court judge.

None of this has been announced by the Governor’s Office, but he has two weeks to make his decision known.

Who got to Walker? Insiders say that Bruce Botelho, a political operative who has strong influence with the governor, got involved.

Botelho was part of forming the hybrid Walker-Mallott ticket back in 2014, was the head of his transition team to form the Walker government. He has been a ghost member of the Walker Cabinet for the entire three and a half years that Walker has been in office and is consulted in every major decision.

Amy Mead

ABOUT MEAD

Amy Gurton Mead was appointed the City and Borough of Juneau’s Attorney in 2013. She earned a JD from Tulane Law School and a B.A. in psychology from Boston University.  She served as a judicial clerk for the Hon. Thomas A. Jahnke, an assistant district attorney in Ketchikan from 1996 to 1998, and as an assistant attorney general in Juneau from 2000 to 2001. She was the City and Borough attorney for Wrangell  from 2008 to 2010.

She was in private practice with Robertson, Monagle & Eastaugh (now Hoffman Blasco) from 1998 to 2000 and from 2001 to 2010. In 2010 she joined the City and Borough of Juneau Law Department as an assistant city attorney.

 

Julie Willoughby

ABOUT WILLOUGHBY

Julie Willoughby is a Stanford Law School graduate, who has a B.S. from University of San Francisco. She is a former Alaska Supreme Court law clerk, Superior Court law clerk, constitutional law professor and former assistant district attorney. Now in private practice, she has many years of experience representing clients in the Alaska criminal justice system both in state and federal courts.

Walker to Army Corps of Engineers: Stop Pebble now

11

GOVERNOR WANTS FEDS TO ABORT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OF MINE

No sooner had the Friday deadline passed to help determine the range of an environmental impact statement, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers was asked by Alaska’s governor to stop the Pebble Mine Project environmental review in its tracks.

Gov. Bill Walker on Saturday told the Corps to just say “no” to Pebble’s due process for an environmental impact statement process.

“The PLP (Pebble Limited Partnership) has yet to demonstrate to us or the Alaska public that they have proposed a feasible and realistic project. Without, at minimum a preliminary economic assessment, but preferably a pre-feasibility study, the corps will be unable to take a hard look at all the reasonable alternatives in the draft EIS,” the governor wrote in a letter to the Corps that was also signed by Lt. Gov. Byron Mallott.

That may be true, but especially so because the project hasn’t been able to go through an environmental review process to make its case for mine-watershed compatibility.

The Walker Administration has previously taken a stand against the Pebble Mine, even while the mine developer has scaled the project back to within a range of what the EPA had once said would be acceptable. But during a gubernatorial debate in Naknek earlier this month, Democratic challenger Mark Begich said Walker was not doing enough to oppose the mine. On Saturday, Walker responded to Begich’s election-year jibe and stepped up his game in challenging the Corps.

The objective of the scoping was simply to identify specific elements of the environment that might be affected by the copper and gold mine planned for 200 miles West of Anchorage.

This spring, the Walker Administration asked the Corps to delay the scoping deadline, which it did — from April 30 to June 29. It was a delay tactic by the Walker Administration, but it wouldn’t be his last word on the matter.

“Given the unique characteristics of the region, the mine proposed by Pebble Limited Partnership (PLP) must be held to an extraordinarily high standard,” Walker wrote. “I thank you for previously extending the scoping period, as requested in a letter from Department of Natural Resources Commissioner Mack to Colonel Michael Brooks.”

Walker said that the project should go through a “pre-feasibility study” before the Corps would be allowed to thoroughly review the environmental impact statement.

Pebble Partnership CEO Tom Collier issued a statement of his own on Saturday, in response to the governor’s letter:

“The governor has said we have a high bar to demonstrate how we can mine and protect the salmon in the area around Pebble. It is this Corps Environmental Impact Statement process that will give Alaskans answers and assurance to this very issue. We believe we can successfully and responsibly operate a mine at Pebble. This is what the Corps will evaluate and we can either meet this expectation or we cannot.

“The scoping process for Pebble has just concluded and we look forward to reviewing the scoping report outlining the many issues that the Corps will review in their evaluation of Pebble.

“We find it incredibly disappointing that the governor’s request to suspend the NEPA process is nearly identical to that brought forward by the anti-Alaska, anti-development Natural Resources Defense Council. We expect this type of stall tactic from ENGOs opposed to any kind of development but not from the Governor of Alaska and especially when the project is on Alaska land. Frankly, the governor does not make a compelling case to suspend the NEPA process.

“It is this type of behavior that makes many in the global investment community reluctant to invest in Alaska. Alaska is consistently ranked very high for our resource potential yet we continue to score poorly on political and permitting stability, frequently showing up with jurisdictions that have very little regard for the rule of law.

“Pebble is located on state land and as such is a potentially important asset for Alaska’s economic future. Pebble could provide jobs, revenue, and economic activity for the region and the rest of the state. As such, it must be thoroughly evaluated. We believe our technical and environmental work can meet Alaska’s standards for development and when we do that we can put thousands to work.

“We know that that vast majority of Alaskans, regardless of their views about our project, support the rule of law and a fair process for reviewing Pebble. The Governor of Alaska should believe in this process too,” Collier said.

During the scoping process, people were invited to recommend the kinds of topics that an environmental impact statement should include. A review of the comments made online reveal that the vast majority of comments were simply opposed to the project under any conditions, and were not actual recommendations to determine the scope of the environmental investigation.

Read the 15,044 comment made at the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers website here.

Pebble has been a lightning rod project, spawning ballot initiatives since 2008, when 57 percent of Alaskan voters said no to a ballot measure that would have killed the project. This year’s Stand for Salmon ballot initiative is strongly motivated by environmentalists’ desire to stop the Pebble Mine.

Kenai sport fishing group urges catch-and-release kings

2

GROUP URGES CONSERVATIVE APPROACH

The Kenai River Sportfishing Association has asked Fish and Game Commissioner Sam Cotten to restrict in-river fishing for late-run king salmon to catch-and-release. In a dramatic gesture to conserve kings, KRSA is also asking that commercial setnet fishing on the east side beaches be limited to no more than 24-hours per week.

The group’s board of directors passed a resolution on Thursday that said because salmon returns throughout Alaska in 2018 are struggling to meet minimum escapement goals, and because critically low numbers of king salmon in Cook Inlet have already required the closure of the Anchor, Deshka, Susitna and early-run Kenai River king salmon, the State should take a precautionary approach for Kenai kings this year. Beginning July 1, the State should designate a non-retention policy — catch-and-release.

“It’s time for action as currently fewer than 100 large king salmon are passing the counter each day and the forecast for the second run of Kenai kings is the third lowest run size on record,” said Ricky Gease, KRSA Executive Director. “We ask that these restrictions remain in place until in-season data warrants a more liberal approach.”

Meanwhile, starting Tuesday, July 3, Alaska Department of Fish and Game has issued an emergency closure to all Ship Creek sport fishing. The king salmon return appears to be both late and weak in this popular Anchorage rod and reel fishery.