Friday, April 24, 2026
Home Blog Page 1387

Is capping cruise ship visitors a good idea?

6

By WIN GRUENING

The idea of imposing a cap on the number of cruise ships and visitors allowed in Juneau has once again been raised.  The concept was last seriously discussed when Juneau hosted around 500,000 cruise ship visitors.  This past summer season 1.3 million cruise visitors were served – certainly a healthy increase.

While there are impacts from cruise ships, the economic benefits are substantial. Cruise visitors spend over $200 million annually in Juneau and Juneau’s municipal budget gains $25 million yearly directly through sales taxes (that can be spent on anything from schools to streets) as well as passenger and port fees. 

Despite assertions 20 years ago that further tourism growth in Juneau was unsustainable, impacts as evidenced by resident complaints have substantially decreased in the interim.  Prior to 2000, complaints to the tourism hotline routinely exceeded 250 calls over the course of the visitor season.  In the last 10 years, total hotline calls have averaged only 50 calls per season – a 90% decrease – an average of 10 calls per month.

This dramatic improvement in managing impacts is attributable to the cooperative efforts of Juneau tour operators, cruise lines, transportation providers and the City and Borough of Juneau (CBJ).  Begun in 1997, a program called Tourism Best Management Practices (TBMP), was established to minimize the impacts of tourism.

Since then, TMBP has formed partnerships with the U.S.  Forest Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the National Park Service. If anything, it’s become a model for other cruise ports – especially in SE Alaska – where a half dozen other communities are considering establishing similar programs. 

The legal and logistical obstacles in promulgating and enforcing a limit on cruise visitors is a significant concern.  Would we try to limit the small “niche” cruises or just the big ships?  Which ones? And whose grandmother will be denied a once-in-a-lifetime cruise to Alaska?

Furthermore, at the very time Juneau has successfully resolved a contentious lawsuit and re-established a working relationship with the cruise industry, this effort will undermine cooperative efforts going forward.

It should be noted that while the impacts of Juneau cruise ship visitors are spread over 32,000 residents, our neighboring town of Hoonah with its 760 residents hosted 138 ships carrying 250,000 cruise visitors – almost eight times the Juneau per capita visitation.  

The impacts can be managed. The question is how.

Imposing a cap is akin to using a sledgehammer when a flyswatter will suffice.  The TMBP program has identified several areas for continuing improvement this year, including impacts of whale-watching and traffic congestion.  Doesn’t it make more sense to mitigate specific identified impacts instead of penalizing every business and family in Juneau whose livelihoods depend on cruise visitor spending?

The irony should not be lost on us that many amenities Juneau residents enjoy are directly attributable to the growth in the cruise industry – such as the seawalk, improved downtown streets, expansive docks, downtown parks, and improved harbor facilities and parking. 

Dozens of small businesspeople in Juneau have invested their life savings and sweat equity to establish restaurants, breweries, food trucks, and gift stores, many of which wouldn’t be open year-round if not for the influx of summer visitors.

Despite TMBP’s successes, it will never be able to totally eliminate all impacts to all residents. For most of us, this is the trade-off we make in order to sustain a vital component of our economy that provides so much to our community.

That’s not to say we shouldn’t always be looking for better ways to manage growth.  We all need to recognize the challenges and we shouldn’t be afraid to talk about how best to manage tourism impacts. Towards that end, Mayor Weldon has established a task force to determine whether the city’s current approach to managing tourism is effective.

No doubt, the controversial topic of limiting the number of cruise ship visitors will be discussed.

But the path forward lies not in ending the successful TBMP program but continuing to improve it.  That should be the focus of the Mayor’s Task Force in the months ahead.

That’s the way we’ll make Juneau a great place to visit, but more importantly, a great place to live.

Win Gruening retired as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in 2012. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is active in community affairs as a 30-plus year member of Juneau Downtown Rotary Club and has been involved in various local and statewide organizations.

John Coghill files for his Senate Seat B, Fairbanks

15

Senator John Coghill is “in” for the 2020 election cycle: On Friday he filed for reelection to Senate Seat B, representing a wide swath of the Western Fairbanks and and North Pole.

Coghill has served in the Legislature since 1999, when he started his political career in the Alaska House. District B includes some of the more liberal University of Alaska Fairbanks neighborhoods, although it is generally considered a safe seat for a Republican.

Coghill is a social conservative whose decisions are firmly grounded in his Christian faith. Although he was the sponsor of Senate Bill 91, which many blame for a crime wave because of its lenient sentencing provisions, he ultimately voted for its overhaul and repeal when it came time to vote on House Bill 49, the “repeal and replace” bill.

A third-generation Alaskan, he was born in Fairbanks and raised in Nenana. During his first semester at UAF, he received his draft notice, and enlisted in the Air Force. After five years, he returned to Nenana to work with his family’s business, Nenana Fuel Co. He and his wife Luann are active in their church, and Coghill has served as a prison minister and as the pastor’s administrative assistant. He has taught adult Bible classes through his church and leads private prayer meetings while in Juneau.

District B leans right. In 2018, Gov. Michael Dunleavy won the district, 6,057 to Mark Begich’s 3,843 votes. During that same election, House District 3’s Tammie Wilson, a Republican, won with 92.14 percent of the vote, while House District 4 was taken by hard-left Democrat Grier Hopkins, with 51.74 percent of the vote, while Republican Jim Sackett pulled in 43.35 percent. A third candidate, Tim Lamkin, ran in that race, skimming 4.69 percent.

Back in 2016, President Trump did much better than Hillary Clinton in this district, with Trump winning 9,473 votes to Clinton’s 4,903.

But down ballot, Coghill was challenged by the former mayor Luke Hopkins, a Democrat and an acolyte of Gov. Bill Walker. The final vote on the 2016 General Election ballot was a strong 53 percent for Coghill, and 46 percent for Hopkins.

Coghill is Rules Committee chairman for the Senate Republican majority.

Ben Carson relays ‘big hairy men’ story from Alaska, gets grilled by hard-left Democrat

10

The Downtown Hope Center When Rep. Jennifer Wexton from Virginia asked HUD Secretary Ben Carson to apologize for saying that transgendered “big hairy men” were trying to get into women’s shelters, Carson would not apologize.

After all, the brain surgeon serving in the Trump Administration had only been relaying a story he had heard from Alaskan women regarding an organization in the 49th state that was being asked to admit men into its women’s shelter.

Which organization? Wexton pursued.

Carson couldn’t remember the name of it, but went on to criticize the politically correct enforcement on free speech that seems to have infected the U.S. House of Representatives and the rest of the public square.

The brief exchange came during a House Financial Services Committee hearing on access to affordable housing, particularly by protected classes. Wexton said she was giving Carson a “chance to apologize” for remarks made to HUD employees during a recent meeting.

Take a look at his response to Wexton:

In 2017, the Downtown Hope Center found itself at a crossroads when a man, who was dressed as a woman, asked for a floor mat for the night. He wanted to sleep among all the other women who were there that night.

The shelter only serves women, and specifically women who have been abused or trafficked. And the man-cum-woman was drunk and belligerent.

The shelter said no, the individual and the Anchorage Equal Rights Commission sued the center for violating his/her rights. Eventually the case was settled, with the Downtown Hope Center and the Alliance for Defending Freedom winning a large settlement from the municipality.

The person at the center of the controversy, who was Timothy Coyle but is now known as Samantha Coyle, is interviewed in this KTUU report, where News Anchor Mike Ross refers to Samantha by the pronoun “they” in the story’s introduction. Coyle says her government identification says that now she is female.

Since that interview with KTUU, Coyle’s woes have continued. Although she was able to get into an apartment, she has been recently served with eviction papers for nonpayment of rent for the Weidner apartment. A court hearing was held last on Oct. 24, with a pre-trial conference scheduled for Dec. 5.

Rep. Revak gets nod, moves from House to Senate Seat M

8

When Lt. Gov. Kevin Meyer showed up at the Legislative Information Offices in Anchorage at 2:40 pm on a Saturday with a folder in hand, the reason was obvious: The Alaska Senate Republicans confirmed they accepted Rep. Josh Revak as the senator for District M, south Anchorage.

Rep. Revak disappears into the elevator at the Legislative Information Office for his interview with Senate Republicans.

Revak’s name was chosen by Gov. Mike Dunleavy after the Senate Republicans refused to approve Rep. Laddie Shaw, for reasons they left unstated.

The meeting between Revak and the Senate Republicans took place at the Legislative Information Offices in Anchorage.

Revak will represent District 25 and 26. He lives in Abbott Loop and Lower Hillside’s District 25.

District 25 Republicans will convene on Nov. 11 to begin the process of replacing Revak.

Revak was born in 1981, into “very humble conditions,” spending his first years in a mobile home, with land to grow crops and raise livestock in rural Minnesota.

Revak enlisted in the U.S. Army as a battle Tank crew member at age 20. He joined the Army January 2002 and by May 2003 he deployed to Iraq with 1-37 Armor, 1st BDE, 1st Armored Division. He was redeployed to combat in January 2006 where he was severely wounded by an enemy mortar attack.

He was hired as Military and Veterans Affairs Liaison to Congressman Don Young in December 2009, were he worked for six years and moved to Alaska with his wife Marta and their two daughters Keilah and Sydney. In May 2016 was hired by Senator Dan Sullivan where he worked for over two years, spearheading issues in the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans affairs.

Revak earned an MBA in business administration and management from Alaska Pacific University, was awarded a Purple Heart Medal and Presidential Unit Citation Award recipient, served as Treasurer in the Abbott Loop Community Council, is a life member in the Military Order of the Purple Heart, VFW and NRA, Safari Club International, Alaska Chapter (where he works with the organization’s Wounded Warrior on Safari Program.)

Alaska Life Hack: Turning the clock back an hour

4

FALL BACK, SLEEP IN, AND FIND THE WHITE LIGHTS

Into the four months of “double darkness” we go. On Sunday, Nov. 3, Alaska moves from Daylight Savings Time back to Standard Time.

As Alaska ends eight months of extra evening hours, the clock-changing exercise gives Alaskans the illusion of having more daylight in the morning, but the days feel suddenly shorter after work.

Welcome to winter. Changing the clocks, added to the fact that Alaskans are experiencing sunlight fade at warp speed, sends everyone looking for their strings of white lights to cheer up the darkness.

After all, between Nov. 1 and Nov. 15, the majority of Alaskans will lose more than 70 minutes of daylight — that’s about 5-1/2 minutes per day during these first two weeks of November. Adding the sudden loss of an hour in the evening when the clock changes to Standard Time gives Alaskans a “wow, that was fast,” experience as winter descends.

The exact time when clocks change Saturday night is 2 am, but most people fuss with their wall and stove clocks before going to bed or when they rise in the morning.

Your digital devices will generally adjust themselves to the proper time, but for those with older cars that don’t have smart-time devices, drivers have a semi-annual struggle to reset clocks, and an increasing number of people simply abandon the effort. After all, there’s always a smart phone somewhere nearby, so who cares if the car is wrong for four months out of the year?

When it comes to travel, that’s where things can get confusing. If you’re flying through Arizona or Hawaii, just remember they don’t change their clocks, like other states. And Unalaska observes Hawaii-Aleutian Daylight Time, although no commercial flights are heading that way until next week.

Politically, the debate over the biannual clock confusion is getting picked up in legislative halls with increasing frequency. At least 26 states have considered stopping the flip-flop, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Lawmakers cite safety of children standing at bus stops as a main reason for staying going on Standard Time. But the origins of the time warp go back to World War 1 and an effort to conserve coal in home furnaces.

[Read: The origins of Daylight Savings Time at Farmers Almanac]

THE MOOD IS TO STOP THE CLOCK

This year 46 bills were introduced in 26 states proposing to move to either Standard Time or Daylight Savings Time on a permanent basis. Most of those bills are still pending, but the Washington State Legislature passed a law this year to stay on Daylight Savings Time.

The problem is, federal law doesn’t allow that without congressional approval, and Congress is paralyzed with impeachment proceedings. So Washington state will be turning its clocks back like the rest of us.

Other states that passed legislation to make Daylight Savings Time permanent are Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Nevada, Oregon, and Tennessee and Washington.

Alaska has had a parade of bills to end the clock flip flop: In the 21st Legislature (1999-2000), 22nd (2001-2002), 24th (2005-2006). During the 2015-2016 session, Sen. Anna MacKinnon’s bill to make Alaska Standard Time permanent passed the Senate, only to die in the House.

In Congress, Sens. Marco Rubio and Rick Scott of Florida this year introduced a bill to make Daylight Savings Time permanent. Florida Congressman Vern Buchanan introduced the companion legislation in the House.

The Sunshine Protection Act, legislation is the second time Rubio has introduced the measure since Florida passed legislation enacting year-round Daylight Savings Time if Congress ever acts.

A one-page summary of the bill is at this link.

Alice Rogoff, former ADN publisher, gets charity status for Arctic publication

2

Alice Rogoff took her online webzine Arctic Today with her when she parted out the the Alaska Dispatch (formerly and now once again the Anchorage Daily News).

[Read: The Alice Rogoff chronicles]

Rogoff, who had hosted President Barack Obama at her Campbell Lake home in 2015, told the bankruptcy court two years later that her Arctic Today online publication was not worth anything.

[Read: That time when Alice Rogoff threatened personal bankruptcy]

The bankruptcy judge, seeking to simplify a mess of limited liability corporations that had been set up to move money around the Alaska Dispatch world, allowed Rogoff to take the publication, then known as Arctic Now.

None of the creditors fought for it. In fact, it didn’t look like it was worth fighting for as a publication with barely a pulse.

Now, it appears Rogoff was right — it’s not worth anything, at least as a commercial concern. Last year, she was recruiting for an ad sales person, trying to grow the bottom line. This year, after trying to make a go of it financially with Arctic Today, and after paying her skeleton staff out of her own resources, Rogoff has turned it into a nonprofit.

She advised readers of the change, and she asked them for tax-deductible donations to be mailed to a Potomac Falls, Virginia address.

Rogoff is the incorporator and president of the nonprofit, which is registered with the State of Alaska Department of Commerce. She is using her home address on Campbell Lake in Anchorage for that purpose.

But no charity filing appears at the Internal Revenue Service, GuideStar.org or CharityNavigator.org. An organization must have an IRS 501(c)(3) status in order to be tax exempt and must comply with other federally established rules.

Having that special tax status will allow Rogoff to receive grants from many source, whether it’s the Rasmuson Foundation, the Woodrow Wilson Center (where she serves as co-chair of the Arctic Initiative), or perhaps organizations such as the Pew Charitable Trust.

Others are involved: Dwayne Menezes is vice president. He is the founder and managing director of the Polar Research and Policy Initiative, a London-based think tank.

Directors include University of Alaska journalism professor Elizabeth Arnold, and former Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell, who has launched a company that plans to ship natural gas from the North Slope via ocean routes.

Also on the board are Halla Hrund Logadóttir, who is the co-founder and co-director of the Arctic Initiative at Harvard Kennedy School of Government; and Tero Vauraste, president and CEO of Arctia Group, a company owned by the nation of Finland.

Rogoff, Treadwell, and Vauraste circle back with Menezes in another nonprofit: All serve on the advisory board for Menezes’ Polar Research and Policy Initiative.

Previous incorporators no longer associated with the nonprofit include John Tichotsky, a former special assistant to former Gov. Bill Walker.

Rogoff is familiar with setting up nonprofits. She set up an art gallery in downtown Anchorage, making it a nonprofit supported by both federal and State of Alaska grants. Many in the downtown business world viewed it as a bit of a scam to market Native art in competition with the private sector, which was already doing that.

But it brought in millions of dollars in grants while it lasted.

Rogoff also founded the Alaska House in New York City, another nonprofit gallery that opened with a splash in 2008 and closed in 2015 after the Alaska Legislature refused to giver her $600,000 to keep it open. It had depended on the generosity of philanthropists such as billionaire Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Daisy Soros, sister-in-law to George Soros.

And then there was Rogoff’s husband at the time, supporting all of these ventures: Carlyle Group cofounder David Rubenstein.

When Rogoff bought the online Alaska Dispatch in 2008, and the Anchorage Daily News in 2014, most Alaskans who paid attention to the wealthy East Coast socialite, thought of her as the richest person who had ever run away to Alaska.

Later, when through her various limited liability companies she stiffed contractors and workers, as well as her former business partner Tony Hopfinger, the other side of her finances started to show, especially in bankruptcy court, where it became evident she was nearly completely dependent on the good will and checkbook of her estranged, now-former husband Rubenstein.

[Read: Rogoff loses to former business partner Hopfinger]

(Craig Medred photo)

Caltagirone drops bid for Anchorage Assembly

5

Just a week after announcing his decision to run for Anchorage Assembly, Peter Caltagirone has said it’s too much — his job at DNR is his concern that takes his entire attention; the campaign would need more time than he’d estimated. He’s withdrawn from the race.

That leaves Rick Castillo as the leading conservative candidate up against Democrat Suzanne LaFrance.

This narrowed quickly, but the election begins in mid-March, so twists and turns may be ahead. Will a spoiler jump in and hand the seat to the Democrat incumbent for this heavily Republican district?

Epic: Classic Don Young, locks antlers with ‘Move On’ predator camera

Move On is an organization that began as a group to defend Bill Clinton against impeachment.

Ironically, its activists were stalking Republicans in the Longworth House Office Building to harass them over their impeachment vote, when they stalked the wrong guy: Congressman Don Young.

After chasing and haranguing the congressman down a hall and to an elevator, the Move On activists found themselves literally face to face with the Dean of the House, who came up to the camera and briefly locked horns with it, tapping “hello” to it in the most polite fashion possible.

Watch the exchange here:

The media, in its usual fashion, said Young “head-butted” the camera, but the evidence shows otherwise. It’s almost as if they wanted Young to do something outrageous, but he was pretty mellow, considering the dogged persistence of the fellows following him.

(An observer noted “it was no head butt. If Congressman Young had intended a head butt, the camera would be in the repair shop.”)

Recall effort harms Alaska’s ability to right its fiscal ship

23

By CRAIG RICHARDS

I have been retained to represent a group that opposes the recall of Gov. Mike Dunleavy.

I was surprised when reading the recall application. The stated grounds for recall are a hodgepodge of accusations, none of which appear legally sufficient nor honestly reflect the reasons behind the effort. They are not really attempting to unseat the governor because he appointed a judge 27 days late or over the nuances of how he used the line-item veto.

Instead, the energy around recall appears twofold. First, a group of partisans began organizing a recall in early February, just after Gov. Dunleavy took office, because they were dissatisfied with the election results. Second, and more meaningful, Gov. Dunleavy aggressively tried to cut government spending, which displeased those affected by the cuts. The latter passion is real and translates at a visceral level among voters. But for the sake of all of us, it does not justify a recall.

Since the drop in oil prices in 2014, the state has been careening toward a monumental fiscal cliff. Repeated multibillion-dollar deficits — the fiscal year 2020 deficit is about $1.6 billion — have been funded by spending savings.

When Gov. Bill Walker took office, state savings were more than $10 billion. At their highest point, in fiscal year 2013 under Gov. Sean Parnell, savings were more than $16 billion. Today that number is shy of $2 billion, or about one year of savings left at current oil prices.

The five-year luxury of kicking the can down the road and burning through savings in lieu of hard decisions is over. We have to close the fiscal gap.

Practically, there are only four available actions that can be taken to balance the state budget: spending cuts, increased oil taxation, adoption of broad-based taxes (sales or income) and a different dividend formula that, in the medium-term, reduces the dividend. The magnitude of the fiscal gap is such that only implementing one or two of these options is insufficient; likely, it will need to be some combination of three or all four.

But each of these options is unpopular and has motivated constituencies protecting the status quo.

I was Gov. Walker’s attorney general when he first considered vetoing part of the dividend in 2016. He made a hard decision, quickly became one of the least popular governors in the country, and a group formed to recall him.

Gov. Dunleavy chose to focus on spending cuts first. Same outcome — affected constituencies are upset and have moved to toss him out. Had Mark Begich won and implemented an income tax, others would be beating the recall drum. And state policy makers who advocate for increased oil taxes will no doubt be targeted politically (I know, I’ve been there).

We all have our preferred fix to balance the budget. But the fiscal decisions required to keep the state from going over the cliff will not be what I — or anyone else — wants. It will be a compromise, and it will be hard. Individual Alaskans, government agencies, and businesses large and small will be significantly affected.

Yet the cost of inaction is greater than the cost of any particular solution. If we close the deficit we can always adjust the “how” over time; if we run out of savings before we balance the budget the damage to our state and economy will be catastrophic.

It is self-destructive to spend a year plus fighting over a potential recall because the order and magnitude of actions taken on the deficit differ from what some prefer. No governor could make meaningful yet popular decisions that address our fiscal challenges — the problem is too large.

When Gov. Walker faced recall for vetoing part of the dividend he said, “I respect these Alaskans’ right to voice their objections over my budget vetoes. However that does not sway my decision on how to address the state’s fiscal challenges.”

Gov. Dunleavy is likewise in the unenviable position of having to make difficult decisions that will negatively affect Alaskans. But leadership requires difficult decisions, and we are out of time and our elected officials must make them.

That is why I will work in the coming months to stop the recall effort. It is a misguided distraction from the hard work of governance necessary to right our fiscal ship.

Craig Richards is an attorney in private practice in Anchorage. He represents Stand Tall With Mike, a group that opposes the recall of Gov. Dunleavy.