Tuesday, November 11, 2025
Home Blog Page 1199

Ketchikan has a race, with Leslie Becker now in position to win House seat from Ortiz

8

The race for House District 36 in Ketchikan didn’t look that promising for conservatives. It’s been tough for Republicans in that red district (they love Donald Trump in Ketchikan) to bump off Rep. Dan Ortiz — the House member who pretends to be a nonpartisan, but aligns with the Democrats nearly every single time on every single vote in Juneau.

Then Must Read Alaska saw the polling and discovered this seat is in play. When people are told about Ortiz’ voting record, they switch to Leslie Becker, the Republican challenging incumbent Ortiz.

The latest polling conducted by Remington Research Group shows strong local support for a fully funded Permanent Fund Dividend and demonstrates that Ortiz is vulnerable.

In the survey 69 percent of the likely voters supported a fully funded PFD with 25 percent supporting a reduced PFD to support government. Undecided on the issue stands at 6 percent.

The poll asked the question:

If the November General Election for State House were held today, would you vote for the Republican Leslie Becker or the Independent Dan Ortiz? The result:

  • Dan Ortiz: 47%
  • Leslie Becker: 43%
  • Undecided: 10%

That puts Becker near the margin of error in general election voters.

However, after telling voters that Ortiz caucuses and votes with the Democrats over 90% the people asked changed; Becker pulled ahead.

  • Leslie Becker: 46%
  • Dan Ortiz: 43%
  • Undecided: 11%

This will be a race to watch.

Jury trials to resume Nov. 2 for misdemeanors, not felony trials until 2021

9

Chief Justice Bolger has issued Special Order 8194, allowing misdemeanor jury trials to resume Nov. 2. However, the suspension of in-person felony criminal and civil trials remains until Jan. 4, 2021, although a presiding judge may allow a felony or civil jury trial to proceed in exceptional circumstances.

Bolger will review whether to continue the in-person felony and civil trial suspension on approximately Nov. 20.

The suspension does not apply to proceedings in which videoconference trials have been approved, such as presumptive death trials.

Jury trials have been suspended in Alaska since mid-March; some proceedings take place via video conference.

In 2016, Galvin asked her Facebook friends to help her find work; now she’s ready to serve in Congress?

16

In a social media post from 2016, Alyse Galvin reached out to her friends on Facebook to get some help finding a job.

One year later, she decided she would be the one to represent Alaska in Congress. Maybe no one found a job for her?

For the past three years, running for office has been Galvin’s job.

Galvin has had many, many, many jobs, according to her strange 30-second TV ad: She has done everything from serving pizza, working the slime line, print shop, coffee stand, daycare, hotel work, office supplies, restaurants, hot dog stand, and scraping ice. She’s kind of done it all.

Can Galvin, age 55, even hold a job? Born in Riverside California, she’s been in the workforce for 25 years, but with all the jobs she lists, it’s a question that has to be asked.

If Galvin wins against Congressman Don Young in November, Galvin would get a two-year job.

Mark Putnum, who is producing Galvin’s and Al Gross’ political ads, is one of the top media-ad guys for the Democratic Party, and was an ad-maker for President Barack Obama. The Anchorage-born-and-raised media expert appears to have gotten so popular and has taken so many projects on, he may have subcontracted Galvin and Gross’ accounts to junior associates.

Was Antifa Alyse’s comms director raising cash for riot management activities?

18

Candidate Alyse Galvin’s communication director this year was providing pro-bono publicity for the Bail Project, a consortium of groups that are bailing out rioters across the country.

On Instagram, Bridget Galvin shared the helpful list of where to send bail money for rioters in violence-torn cities across America.

Now, it appears that the Bail Project, which appears in several places on the list, is associated with actual riot management activities. It was exposed last week after one of its “bail disruptors” was found to have rented a U-Haul that contained supplies for protesters in Louisville, Kentucky.

As the truck is unloaded, the symbols for Antifa are clear in the protest signs that say Abolish the Police, as shown in the video above.

“So the Bail Project is funding the riots that are destroying our cities,” said Tucker Carlson, on Fox. “The question is, who is funding the bail project?”

While some have pointed to George Soros, it’s clear that people like Galvin, who have supported the project, are actively spreading lists of where people can give to associated groups that are bailing out rioters. The Bail Project claims it has thousands of donors.

Influence Watch lists several liberal/progressive foundations as cornerstone donors:

  1. Blue Meridian Partners (Non-profit)
  2. Bohemian Foundation (Non-profit)
  3. Borealis Philanthropy (Non-profit)
  4. Cloud Mountain Foundation (Non-profit)
  5. Leaves of Grass Fund (Non-profit)
  6. NEO Philanthropy (Non-profit)
  7. Propel Capital Network (For-profit)
  8. Silicon Valley Community Foundation (Non-profit)
  9. Vital Projects Fund (Non-profit)

According to PolitiFact, Holly Zeller, founder of the Louisville Bail Project, had rented the truck on her own time to help with the protests.

“Holly rented the truck in her personal capacity, during her time off, and did not use funds from The Bail Project,” Camilo Ramirez, director of communications for the Bail Project, told PolitiFact. “I watched the video and saw painted signs and water, but of course some people are exploiting the clip to create misinformation and attack our organization.”

None of this would have come to light, but for a reporter from the Daily Caller, who was on the scene, watching as shields, signs, and water were unloaded from the truck near the scene of riots.

PolitiFact describes the social media posts around this incident as “Mostly False,” while at the same time confirming that Zeller rented the truck, and not denying that supplies were unloaded for rioters. Social Media censors at Facebook have taken down posts that refer to the incident, declaring them false.

The organization’s bail fund treasury now stands at $27 million.

Galvin’s mother, Alyse Galvin, is running for Congress with the support of the Alaska Democratic Party, the DNCC, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Trump rally draws hundreds

9

As many as 200 Alaskans gathered in the parking lot of Cabela’s in Anchorage on Saturday afternoon, unfurling their American flags and Trump flags for the most boisterous rally in Alaska so far for president Donald Trump.

Other rallies have been held in Homer, Big Lake, and Wasilla.

Organizers, who passed a hat to raise money to cover the costs, had brought in a DJ and sound system that blared favorite energetic tunes, such as “YMCA,” and the crowd bounced and danced to the music. Speakers included former Gov. Sarah Palin, Anchorage Assembly member Jamie Allard, and candidate for mayor Dave Bronson.

No mainstream media covered the event, but participants took plenty of photos and posted them around Facebook.

After two hours at the parking lot, speeches and songs, the Pledge of Allegiance, the festively decorated trucks and cars lined up and headed for Big Lake Lions Club, flags flapping and lights flashing all the way. The line of cars stretched for over a mile.

Robin Brena’s dirty little secret

Why would a single Alaskan cough up $1 million of his own cash to push a ballot initiative?

That’s what Anchorage trial lawyer Robin Brena has done. What’s in it for Brena? Even a fat cat, wealthy, and serial predator-lawyer like Brena, who’s been stuffing his bank account with loads of cash for years by suing oil companies, must feel the sting of losing $1 million. 

You would think the Leftists running the Anchorage Daily News might be interested in such a thing. Doesn’t the paper’s liberal editor, David Hulen, care about the wealthy throwing their money around trying to manipulate policy and elections?  

The Daily News ran a story Saturday focusing on the money the oil industry is spending fighting Proposition One on the ballot Nov. 3. The industry has spent $15 million. We know why. Ballot Measure 1 would increase the oil company’s cost in a field by 150 to 300% overnight depending on the price of oil. 

At the current $40 per barrel price of Alaska North Slope Crude, oil companies keep 5% of their profits for each barrel produced. The other 95% goes to the government in taxes and royalties.

If Ballot Measure 1 passes, at the current price, oil companies will lose money on every barrel produced. As the price of oil rises the oil company’s profits increase. But there’s no guarantee the price of oil will rise anytime soon considering the drain on demand and the abundance of supply thanks to COVID-19.  

The ADN also didn’t tell you in 2019, Conoco Phillips reinvested its profits back into Alaska in hopes of producing even more oil in the future. The more we tax them, the less they’ll have for future investment.

Don’t expect Hulen to let that fact slip out from any of his reporters working at the paper.

So, we know what’s in it for the oil companies. Their future in Alaska. Ballot Measure 1 would shift oil companies to cease investing their profits for future development in Alaska and instead transition into harvest mode. They will focus on getting the oil out of the ground already accessible and then cut and run. 

You say the oil companies will never leave Alaska. Really? Have we already forgotten the harsh and devastating lesson of BP’s exit? Ask a few nonprofits around town if they’re feeling the sting of no more BP in Alaska. 

Back to the story the ADN, Hulen, and the paper’s owner, Ryan Binkley, refuse to cover. What’s in it for Robin Brena if Ballot Measure 1 passes? Why would he spend $1 million of his own money on Ballot Measure 1? 

There’s a small section at the very bottom of the ballot measure no one is talking about. It reads: 

“The act would also make all filings and supporting information relating to the calculation and payment of the new tax a matter of public record.”  

And therein lies the gold mine for Brena.

Brena has spent his life suing oil companies. He’s become very wealthy doing so. 

Prop One would open the books of the oil companies to Brena. Every contract, every dollar spent, from construction work to buying flowers. Industry analysts describe the clause as unprecedented in its invasiveness. It would put oil companies doing business in Alaska at a great disadvantage competitively with other global companies. 

It’s a dream scenario for a serial litigator targeting the oil companies. That’s why Brena is willing to cough up $1 million of his own cash for Ballot Measure 1. If the measure passes, he’ll see a huge return on investment. Brena will be laughing all the way to the bank.

Some may argue Brena really believes oil companies should pay Alaska “its fair share” and that’s why he’s spending $1 million to convince voters to support Ballot Measure 1.

Impossible! The man can’t possibly be that stupid. 

How could Brena possibly believe forcing oil companies to lose money producing a barrel of oil in Alaska is fair. Especially during a time when the industry is reeling thanks to COVID-19. The Wall Street Journal reported last week the oil industry is expected to layoff 100,000 workers in America this year alone. 

Ballot Measure 1 will destroy Alaska’s economy now and for years to come. Alaskans will be forced to leave the state they love. The ramifications of a wounded and diminished oil sector will impact all other segments of Alaska’s economy. 

The worst part of it is we will have done this to ourselves. This will not be a case of the feds shutting us down. 

A wealthy lawyer is spending $1 million trying to convince enough Alaskans that an industry currently keeping only 5% of its profits and covering 85% of the state’s bills is not paying its fair share.

Brena’s ridiculous argument may just work if enough Alaskans are so consumed with greed, they’d be willing to shut down the industry that is the economic lifeline of the state. What a tragedy if Brena succeeds. 

Dan Fagan hosts the number one rated morning drive radio show in Alaska. It airs on Newsradio 650 KENI. He splits his time between New Orleans and Anchorage. 

You have to wonder

In the world of politics, you have to wonder sometimes.

When the late Lt. Gov. Byron Mallott abruptly resigned and vanished amid rumors he made “inappropriate,” unspecified comments to a female, effectively ending Gov. Bill Walker’s re-election hopes, Walker’s Deputy Chief of Staff, Grace Jang, asked the news media to stand down.

The news media asked a few questions and went home.

Of course, many of the scandal’s details were aired out a year later in the Anchorage Daily News, but the immediate furor and any clamor for information was short-lived. It was a thing one day; history the next.

Fast forward: Since Attorney General Kevin Clarkson abruptly resigned Aug. 25 after sending hundreds of “uncomfortable” text messages to a junior state official, the news media has been in constant full throat.

That is not a bad thing, not a bad thing at all, but we wonder: Why the difference?

Breaking: Trump gives approval for Alberta-Alaska rail line to move resources

70

President Donald Trump says he is issuing a presidential permit for what’s known as the A2A cross-border rail between Alaska and Canada.

“Based on the strong recommendation of @SenDanSullivan and @repdonyoung of the Great State of Alaska, it is my honor to inform you that I will be issuing a Presidential Permit…” he wrote on Twitter, ignoring Sen. Lisa Murkowski. “Congratulations to the people of Alaska & Canada!”

Sources say Congressman Young has been dogged in his pursuit of the rail line permit, calling the President’s chief of staff on numerous occasions to get the White House’s attention to advance the project, which requires presidential permission in order to cross a border.

Sen. Sullivan spoke with the president in the hours leading up to the announcement, according to MRAK sources.

The A2A line is a private project that has been in the works for years to build a new railway connecting the Alaska Railroad, and Alaska’s tidewater deep port in Anchorage, to northern Alberta, where oil is trapped and unable to get to market.

The project is 1,600 miles long. From there, rail connections link Alaska to the rest of North America. Among those instrumental in working the project hurdles are Alaska’s delegation in Washington, D.C., Gov. Mike Dunleavy, and former Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell, who serves as vice chair of the project at A2A.

More than $60 million has already been committed to the project that will move Alberta oil to the Port of Alaska and global markets beyond. Currently, other ports on the West Coast are in places where the politics are not supportive of such a project that involves resource development.

But with Alaska’s pro-jobs governor and team in Washington, the $17 billion project could come to fruition.

The company has an agreement with the Alaska Railroad Corporation to create a joint operating plan to upgrade and extend the Alaska Railroad mainline between Seward to North Pole.

“It’s basically a large civil construction project that would include a rail corridor of about 500 feet wide across a route that is relatively straight and relatively flat,” Treadwell told a reporter in 2019.

In addition to moving Canadian oil to tidewater on the West Coast, the rail line can also move minerals.

The A2A would come through the Yukon Territory and Fort Nelson, British Columbia, connecting in Fort McMurray, Alberta.

The project envisions a single steel rail line with sidings so trains can travel in both directions. It would require switching yards, water and wastewater facilities, power lines and fiber optic cable. Of the $17 billion construction budget, $14 billion would be spent in Canada. The remaining $3 billion to be spent in Alaska eclipses numerous years of Alaska’s meager capital budgets, which have been in the low hundreds of millions each year.

Numerous regulatory and permitting hurdles remain. Once construction starts, it’s expected to take over three years to complete.

Schierhorn, Jansen: Make no mistake, Ballot Measure 1 is an attack on our state

23

By JOE SCHIERHORN AND JIM JANSEN

The Vote Yes on 1 crowd wants us to believe that this initiative is a fight between the oil industry and Alaskans. Nothing could be further from the truth. 

This ballot measure is a vicious and dangerous attack on Alaska’s economy, on our way of life and our economic future. The oil industry can invest its capital anywhere in the world and they will if we drive them away with uncompetitive oil taxes.

But where do we go? This is where we live, where we have our jobs, our homes and where we plan a future for our kids and grandkids. Where do we go when we drive away investment and oil production declines? 

This is clearly an Alaska fight, not an oil company battle. 

We are co-chairs of KEEP Alaska Competitive, a 5,000-member group of Alaska businesses, labor unions, Native corporations and individual Alaskans who understand that competitive taxes on our resource industries are essential to our future economy, our jobs and our PFD.

We are not the oil industry and we take no funding from the oil industry. We are a grassroots organization that provides information to Alaskans about the importance of investment, jobs and oil production.  We work very hard to secure an economic future for our employees, neighbors, children and grandchildren. 

The oil industry has paid about $3 billion per year in taxes and royalties to Alaska in each of the past two years. They have plans to substantially increase investment on the North Slope in the future that will provide jobs and increase production substantially “if” we don’t screw it up with a major increase in oil taxes. 

Alaska is a high-cost place to operate, especially on the North Slope. Our oil needs to move through an expensive 800-mile pipeline, then by ship to the West Coast. Other oil provinces have much lower costs of production and transportation. 

Alaska already has the highest government take of all the states at low oil prices and among the highest tax rates in the world. Increasing taxes by $1 billion per year will make Alaska uncompetitive and will reduce or eliminate new investment in our state. 

Other industries, like seafood, mining tourism and the thousands of small service companies, are watching this attack on the oil industry and asking: “are we next?” Why should we invest here? Why would anyone invest in a state under attack by people who want to kill our businesses?

Without new investment, production will decline, jobs will disappear, state revenues will shrink and PFDs will be a thing of the past. 

The coronavirus has turned the world upside down. There are 40,000 fewer jobs in Alaska today than there were one year ago. Alaska is one of the top five states most negatively impacted by COVID-19. 

There are 33% fewer businesses in Alaska than there were in January 2020. Oil prices are extremely low and are forecast to remain low. Why would we want to further damage our economy and kick our major industry when it is down? This is the wrong time to raise taxes on any industry, including the oil industry. 

Please go to our website, KeepAlaskaCompetitive.com, and study the impact of the ballot initiative and vote no on ballot measure 1 on Nov. 3.  Alaska’s future depends on it. 

Joe Schierhorn is the Chairman and CEO of Northrim Bank and Co-Chairman of the KEEP Alaska Competitive Coalition

Jim Jansen is the Chairman of the Lynden Companies and Co-Chairman of the KEEP Alaska Competitive Coalition