Thursday, January 1, 2026
Home Blog Page 1124

Anchorage’s chief health officer has no health background?

In July, Mayor Ethan Berkowitz hired Heather Harris as the new director of the Anchorage Health Department.

Then-Director Natasha Pineda had wanted to leave for months, and finally resigned for personal reasons.

Harris slipped into the spot at the end of August without a question from the media about her qualifications and has been advising the mayor (now interim Mayor Austin Quinn-Davidson, after Berkowitz’ hasty and embarrassing departure in October), and the Anchorage School District on matters relating to business openings and closures, schools, masks, distancing, testing, and more.

Harris, originally from Homer, has no background in health, although she has a management background and an Executive Masters in Public Administration degree.

“Heather brings new energy to AHD at a critical time,” said Mayor Berkowitz at the time. “I have full confidence in her natural leadership and strong public health background to guide the Department through this pandemic, while at the same time ensuring that it fulfills its many responsibilities.  I look forward to working with her.”

In fact, she also has no public health management background. Her LinkedIn resume shows that she was the CEO of Big Brothers Big Sisters and a consultant at the Foraker Group, a group funded and controlled by the Rasmuson Foundation.

Before that, she was the executive director of Alaska Youth Advocates and the Alaska Youth and Parent Foundation. She worked at Standing Together Against Rape and has a bachelor’s degree in human services from University of Alaska Anchorage.

Harris has management skills, in her resume, at least. But the job of health director during the second worst pandemic in American history would suggest that actual training in health or public health would be a requirement for the job. Her predecessor, Pineda, has a Masters in Public Health. She is now working at Providence.

In fact, the job description makes it clear that the director “assures that the delivery of public health services are evidence-based and/or best practices, and build the scientific basis of public health.”

The description goes on to say that the director “collaborates in the development of evidence-based public health practices and programs in collaboration with universities, other health agencies, businesses, trade associations, other staff and the public. Oversees in development, implementation and evaluation of programs and activities for individuals, families and population groups that promote health and prevent disease. Responsible for communicable disease follow-up: Assures that assigned staff makes appropriate recommendations to clients and other professionals regarding control of specific diseases and follows up on health hazard complaints as described in the MOA code and state statues.”

Read the entire job description at this link:

There are several other parts of the job description that indicate the importance of a health management background, such as Item E, where it indicates she is the “on call public health staff for after hours..”

“Heather brings new energy to AHD at a critical time,” said Mayor Berkowitz last July. “I have full confidence in her natural leadership and strong public health background to guide the Department through this pandemic, while at the same time ensuring that it fulfills its many responsibilities.  I look forward to working with her.”

The department is responsible for many services for Anchorage, which has 38 percent of the state’s population within its borders. It has divisions for affordable housing, aging and disability, air quality, animal care and control, public health, domestic violence, emergency utility assistance, emergency preparedness, and the homeless public safety patrol, among others.

Many business leaders in Anchorage have bristled at the numerous closures of businesses over the past year, and parents have complained to the school district about the ill-effects of school closures on families, children, and their school work.

Anchorage is currently under Emergency Order 18, which limits indoor gatherings, mandates mask wearing, and limits bar capacity to 50 percent.

Anchorage Emergency Order 18

​​​​​​​​

I got early treatment with experimental Bamlanivimab

11

By WILLIAM SATTERBERG

Many of the Must Read Alaska readers may not be of the younger generation and may not understand that, with age, comes what are termed “comorbidities.”  

Similarly, the risk of contracting Covid-19 and suffering seriously from the ill effects of Covid-19 significantly increases when you have comorbidities.

For almost a year, I was Covid-19 free. All that changed on Dec. 1, when I noticed a strange, acrid smell in the air.  It was similar to uric acid, a smell not totally unfamiliar to older people and those raising babies.  But it was not from the usual source.  

Rather, it seemed to simply materialize in the cold, outside air. By the next day, I had completely lost my sense of taste and smell.  My Right Guard deodorant and Aqua Velva aftershave had no scent whatsoever.  

The final proof was when I could not taste an Altoid, advertised as a “curiously strong peppermint.”  Rather, Altoids tasted like the yellow chalk I used to eat in elementary school.

I told my wife that I did not smell. She strongly disputed that issue and suggested I take a long shower. 

Still, it was obvious that something had gone wrong. The likelihood was that I had caught Covid-19. In fact, studies have shown that approximately 86% of the people who contract Covid experience a profound loss of smell and taste.

The following day, I had an antigen test. I was positive for Covid-19. Upon returning home, I was immediately banished to the bedroom by my wife.  My instructions were to not emerge for 10 days. Food would be delivered.  I became a prisoner in my own house. My wife had a precautionary Covid test the following day. She also tested positive. To my relief, I was paroled from my lockup since we were now both clearly contaminated with the Cooties.

On the other hand, I began to become concerned. Because my wife and I are both what is now termed mid-elderly, we were considered high risk.  (In fact, my 70th birthday is on April 1.)

I consulted physicians for guidance. Two doctors suggested that I “tough it out.” I should go to the hospital if I found that my breathing became labored or my blood oxygen levels dropped. Fortunately, because I had a Walgreens pulse oximeter, I was able to monitor my blood oxygen levels, which were remaining good. Everyone should own a pulse oximeter.

I continued in my quest for medical guidance. A third doctor, and an old family friend since his childhood, had different advice. He suggested that we consider a new treatment which had just been approved called Bamlanivimab.  

It sounded a lot like a Mideastern village. According to this doctor, Bamlanivimab (otherwise known as “Bambam” for those doctors who could not pronounce the name) consisted of a monoclonal antibody infusion.  Previously, a good friend, Mead Treadwell, had suggested that I research monoclonal antibody infusions. Mead had also caught Covid shortly after the November election. Apparently, both President Trump and Don Young had received infusion treatment with marked success, indicating that it should work on other conservatives.

I learned that, the previous week, Bambam had been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for an Emergency Use Authorization. Although Bambam was an experimental treatment, indications were that the side effects of the infusion were quite benign.  On the other hand, if successful, the infusion would forestall the more serious, potentially fatal effects of Covid-19.

According to the physician, he could not predict that the Bambam infusion would necessarily work upon the patient. What could be said, however, would be that the infusion apparently did not work if the patient progressed into more serious symptoms. Sort of an existential thing.

In the end, my wife and I elected Bambam therapy. We became the second and third people in Fairbanks to have the experimental infusion. Guinea pigs.  

The product, manufactured by Eli Lilly and Company, had been distributed by the United States Government as a precautionary measure to try to reduce the bed uptake by high-risk patients in hospital ICU units. Given our age and other factors, my wife and I qualified as high-risk (not that I was necessarily that fat. I also wish to stress that my wife’s high risk factors were not at all weight-related. Everyone agrees that she has no weight issues. And, out of self-preservation, I will not reveal her age.)

The intravenous infusion took one hour. It was administered at the local hospital in a negative pressure room. An infusion nurse sat patiently with us to monitor for complications. She was a very courageous person who had lost three family members of her own to Covid in the preceding two weeks. They lived in the Midwest. Rather than attending their funerals, however, the nurse had sacrificially chosen to remain in Fairbanks to heal the sick, valiantly exposing herself to the disease in the process. A true hero.

For the next hour after the infusion, the nurse monitored us for any adverse reactions. Two hours after the start of the process, we left the hospital and celebrated at the local Sonic drive-in. For the previous three days, anything I ate had tasted like cardboard. As such, I was surprised when the Sonic banana milkshake did, in fact, actually taste like a genuine banana milkshake. To me, the rest of Sonic’s food still tastes like cardboard, however. Then, again, I am a dedicated Burger King fan.

I was surprised that my sense of taste and smell had returned within three hours of the infusion. Although I cannot say that the infusion was the cause of that recovery, I was pleased. Both my wife and I became essentially asymptomatic for the next 10 days while we quarantined as instructed.  As a collateral benefit, the house had never been cleaner.

Since the date of our infusion, well over 100 patients in Fairbanks have reportedly received the infusion. According to information, all except one patient recovered nicely and without any serious complications resulting from COVID-19.

And this is why I am writing this article. If the reader or people that the reader may know classify as a Covid-19 high-risk category, they should seriously consider the Bamlanivimab infusion. Educate the physician in advance of the availability of the treatment, since many doctors still are not aware of it. The procedure must be prescribed by a physician. It is usually administered in a hospital setting, although recently the Alaska Airlines center in Anchorage was designated as a Bamlanivimab infusion site.  

The only apparent drawback is that, according to the CDC, if an individual does receive the infusion, they must wait 90 days before receiving either the Moderna or the Pfizer vaccine in order to allow the infused, artificial antibodies to dissipate. However, the delay is a small price to pay when one considers that the option of bypassing the infusion could have much more serious, potentially fatal consequences.

Most importantly, the infusion must be administered before serious respiratory symptoms set in. According to the physicians, once serious respiratory symptoms develop, the infusion is ineffective and will not be given. The time window is short for the infusion, usually from 2-10 days from the onset of the first Covid symptoms.  

Simply stated, it is not a situation where one “toughs it out” to see whether or not more serious complications develop. Rather, the entire purpose of Bambam is to receive the infusion before more serious symptoms set in, in order to free up needed ICU beds for those who have not been so fortunate.

Hopefully, the reader of this will not catch Covid-19.  If the disease is contracted, however, the reader should seriously consider the Bamlanivimab infusion.  

Finally, in the event that the reader fares well, might I request that strong consideration be given to donating blood at the local blood bank. Although the Bambam antibodies cannot be used to combat coronavirus directly, the plasma from Covid survivors still carries benefits to others in need of transfusions.  And it is the right thing to do – pay it forward.

Bill Satterberg is an attorney who lives in Fairbanks.

Alaska Municipal League asks Senate for apology for Senate Resolution 2

16

The Alaska Municipal League wants the Alaska Senate Majority to apologize for the wording in Senate Resolution 2, which requested Gov. Mike Dunleavy to issue a new disaster declaration, since the prior declaration was set to expire.

Dunleavy never issued that new disaster declaration and the resolution is effectively dead.

The league, which represents 165 local governments around Alaska, says that the Senate Majority “appears to blame school districts for depression, child abuse, and food insecurity. The Senate appears to blame local governments for thousands of job losses and massive economic harm. Both statements are grossly inaccurate, and surprising to come while recognizing that we remain in the midst of a pandemic.”

Read Senate Resolution 2 here

“We want to be clear – it was not local action that closed schools or reduced economic activity – it was COVID-19. It has been the threat and reality of a global pandemic reaching into our communities and disrupting the lives and livelihoods of Alaskans. Together we have done our best to weather this storm,” the organization wrote.

“The Senate’s resolution fails to recognize the necessary role for local action, with few statewide measures in place. The Governor has been clear throughout that the State depends on local control to take the necessary mitigation efforts that didn’t make sense at a statewide level.

“The Senate’s resolution fails to differentiate between how 165 cities and boroughs have acted, and how 54 school districts have all acted. It cannot be said – it is quite frankly wrong – that all acted the same, or even that the majority acted the same. Alaska has placed a priority on local control during its emergency response, and Alaska’s Senate appears to question the premise,” the organization said.

“We request that Senate leaders issue an apology and correction, to right this wrong,” according to the organization’s statement.

Earlier this week, Nils Andreassen, the executive director and lobbyist for the Alaska Municipal League, threatened to sue the state over the state not full funding education and also threatened a lawsuit over school debt reimbursement.

Many Alaskans have been under the impression that the State of Alaska closed down schools and businesses. The resolution clarifies that for those who may remain confused about it.

The report on the presentation to Senate Finance Committee by Andreassen can be found in Must Read Alaska’s Club MRAK edition of Feb. 18, 2021, linked here.

Should Merrick pay a price?

ANCHORAGE DAILY PLANET

Yet again, a Republican state lawmaker has jumped ship and joined a Democratic coalition in the House – and, yet again, is being rewarded handsomely for the switch.

This time it is Eagle River’s Kelly Merrick, who joined the mostly Democrat coalition led by Rep. Louise Stutes, of Kodiak. The House now is divided, with 19 Republicans on one side of the aisle and 15 Democrats, four undeclared Democrats, and Republicans Merrick and Stutes on the other.

For her swapping sides, Merrick was named co-chair of the House Finance Committee. The position is one of the Legislature’s most powerful and coveted.

After a three-week standoff for leadership of the House, Merrick, who first said she was not joining the mostly Democrat coalition, did just that. Of course, she says she had good reason. It is the best for everybody, she says. It is time to get to work, she says. Besides, she says, she was frustrated by the leadership impasse.

It certainly is not the first time a Republican has bolted from his or her party to join with Democrats in return for powerful legislative positions. In recent memory, Stutes and former Rep. Gabrielle LeDoux immediately come to mind. Sadly, Merrick may not be the last. The need for power, after all, does strange things to legislators.

There may be a price. Merrick represents a bright red district in bright red Eagle River. We are left to wonder what her constituents think about her switch. After all, they voted her into office believing she was a conservative Republican who would act as a Republican and help establish a Republican-led House that would adhere to Republican principals. They now get none of that.

What they get instead is a Democrat coalition running the show. Alaska is a mostly conservative state, but the will of the voters is ignored all too often by political jockeying and coalition politics. With help from a few turncoat Republicans, the minority too often ends up in charge, denying the political will of the majority of Alaskans.

That could be crucial now with the fate of the Permanent Fund dividend looming, along with the prospect of new taxes and other revenue-enhancing options on the horizon.

We suspect Merrick rightfully and eventually will pay a political price for her abandonment.

It cannot be too soon.

Read much more at the Anchorage Daily Planet.

Gruening: Canada’s gut-punch to Southeast Alaska

34

By WIN GRUENING

2020 was tough on tourism.  Alaska’s cruise industry had the worst year in its history.  The global pandemic left thousands unemployed and our private-sector economy in shambles.  Then, just as vaccinations ramped up and Covid-19 infections subsided, our hopes for some semblance of a visitor industry recovery were dashed with the announcement that Canadian ports would continue to be closed to Alaskan cruises until February 2022.

It was a gut punch.  

Under archaic and often misunderstood legislation, the Passenger Vessel Services Act of 1886, or PVSA, cruises between American ports may not transport passengers except on ships that are U.S.-built, owned, and documented.  

An exception is allowed for foreign vessels departing from and returning to the same U.S. port, provided the ship visits a foreign port.  This makes at least one Canadian port call mandatory on almost every Alaskan cruise.

Cruise critics have hammered large cruise lines for years, faulting them for building and flagging ships in foreign countries. There are, however, no shipyards in the U.S. that can build large cruise ships of the size used in Alaska. Even if flagged in America, the ships wouldn’t qualify unless U. S. built.  

The cruise industry must now rely largely on other forces to overcome two major obstacles in their efforts to resurrect the 2021 season – if there’s any chance of cruise ships sailing in Alaska this year.

First, the industry needs to receive clear guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on safety protocols so it can acquire equipment and train crews as well as secure agreement from all the affected Alaska port communities. CDC has had almost a year to prepare for this and has yet to clarify workable guidance.

Second, the provisions of the PVSA could be waived at the congressional level (or perhaps by Presidential executive order) so Canadian stops would not be required for foreign-flagged ships.  Alternatively, a negotiated agreement with the Canadian government may secure an early termination of their cruise ship ban.  It is doubtful Canada would agree to this unless the aforementioned CDC guidelines were in place.

Governor Dunleavy and our congressional delegation are working on both issues full-time but there is no guarantee of success.

Time is rapidly running out. 

According to industry insiders, it will take at least 60 days to get ships ready and crews onboard and trained. The longer it takes to resolve health protocols and the Canadian cruise ban issue, the longer it takes before a decision can be made to salvage any part of the season.  At some point, the cost of running ships in a shortened season will be greater than leaving them mothballed with a skeleton crew.  

In a recent Southeast Conference presentation, Howard Sherman, Norwegian Cruise Line Executive Vice President, stated that if a path to resolving these issues was not found by May 1, then it would likely mean cancellation of their 2021 season.

Needless to say, the worst-case scenario  with major cruise line cancellations would be an unmitigated disaster for hundreds of small businesses and our port communities. Another round of Covid relief funding is likely, but it may not be enough.

Some have suggested ramping up independent tourism,  by ferry, for instance. It’s hard to see how current frequency, capacity, and cost of Alaska ferries could be significantly modified to attract many travelers. The one-way fare for two people with a stateroom (without a vehicle) on AMHS for the 3-day voyage from Bellingham to Haines is $1,441. 

Add a motorhome and the fare is around $4,900. Double that for the return trip due to problematic Canadian border restrictions.

Regardless, the options being considered wouldn’t come close to offsetting the decline in commercial and municipal revenues caused by a shortened or canceled cruise season.

Alaskan communities with economies dependent on cruise visitors are all hoping  for the best but are bracing themselves for the worst.

Even before the Canadian cruise ban extension, the City and Borough of Juneau was facing a $9.9 million deficit this year and an $18.4 million deficit in FY2022. Yet, the Assembly has yet to consider any serious operating spending reductions.

It would seem now is the time.

Win Gruening retired as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in 2012. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is active in community affairs as a 30-plus year member of Juneau Downtown Rotary Club and has been involved in various local and statewide organizations.

Governor tells Sen. Reinbold she’s violated ethics act with misrepresentations and wild allegations about virus

123

Gov. Mike Dunleavy has run out of patience for Sen. Lora Reinbold. In a scorching letter to the senator from Eagle River, he told her that not he, nor anyone in his Administration, will engage with her any longer. The letter is dated Feb. 18, 2021:

“As public officials, we both swear an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Alaska.‘ That oath reads, in part, that public officials will ‘faithfitlly discharge [my] duties as….to the best of [my] ability. ”2 That premise, of faithfully discharging duties, is the basis of public service; that those empowered by the citizens of a land can be trusted to act in good faith on their behalf.

“It is clear you have abdicated the tenets of your oath as a public servant. Out of respect for Article II of the State of Alaska Constitution, I will not outline in detail your violations of the Legislature’s Uniform Rules,3 the Legislative Ethics Act, the manual of legislative procedure guiding conduct on the record, and the Alaska Legislature Professional Workplace Conduct Policy; your continued qualification as a member of the Legislature is a matter best determined by the Voters.

What does fall within my purview, as the Governor of the State of Alaska, is the daily administration of government. An essential part of how state government functions is the interaction between its Legislative and Executive Branches. The laws and budget passed by the Legislature are enacted by the Governor,” Dunleavy wrote.

Dunleavy admonished Reinbold to conduct herself in good faith and in the public interest.

“People can disagree, and do so vehemently; that marketplace of ideas is intrinsic to a republican democratic form of government. When those entrusted by the people, imbued with the dignity and authority of an office affording them the power to change the laws of the land, and to hold the power of the public purse, engage in direct affronts to those responsibilities, they dishonor their office and should be publicly condemned for their conduct,” he continued.

“You have used your position as a member of the Alaska State Senate to publicly misrepresent the State of Alaska’s response to a global health crisis. You impugned the motivations of unelected and non-political employees working for the State of Alaska with baseless allegations that, on multiple occasions, were demonstrated to you to be false. Time and again, when provided the information unequivocally illustrating the blatant inaccuracies in your public statements about the State of Alaska’s health responses, you persisted in continuing to betray the public trust with those statements. You deceived the people of Alaska about their government’s response to the largest public health crisis in a century. In doing so, you violated the obligation you have, as a member of the Legislature, to promoting and protecting public health,” Dunleavy wrote.

Clearly, the chair of Senate Judiciary has gotten on the governor’s last nerve. He continued to admonish:

“The misinformation must end. Since you have been, up until now, either incapable or unwilling to read the responses from employees in the various agencies under my constitutional authority, let me be clear with you:
I have never imposed martial law or forced Alaskans to take the COVID-19 vaccine. My administration instead coordinated with local governments, hospitals, businesses, and volunteer organizations so that as many Alaskans as possible have access to the vaccine if they so wish. Alaska has through this pandemic had one of the best sets of health outcomes in the United States, with some of the least restrictive measures of any state in the country.

“My administration suspended regulations, as authorized under AS 26.23.020, so that Alaskans would not have to subject themselves to increased risks of contracting the virus. This administration also suspended dozens of regulations affecting businesses, to assure that our economy could withstand the shocks it was subjected to in 2020. Our government suspended imposing fees on thousands of Alaskan businesses and prevented increasing fees on our neighbors who were struggling to keep their staff employed and their doors open.

“There are certainly many Alaskans, and colleagues within the Legislature, who had desires and demands for my administration to take more invasive and drastic measures, such as implementing a statewide mask mandate, or overriding the constitutional rights of First Class cities to manage the public health of residents. To those groups’ mutual frustration, I adhered to my stance that the State of Alaska Constitution defers to local control, because the best government is that closest to the people.” As a self-professed small government conservative, you should know this. You do know this, because my administration has responded to you, repeatedly, in answer to your accusations on this subject,” the governor wrote.

“The resources brought to bear in responding to your many superfluous inquiries have been costly, time consuming, and most importantly, distracting from the public duties of the many employees attempting to do the business of the people of Alaska. While it is undoubtedly the rightful place of the Legislature to hold the Executive Branch of government accountable, that process of inquiry must be consistent with the laws, procedures, and within the structured functioning of the Legislature. More importantly, the requests, or demands, must be based in fact, and not in idle speculation, and must be with a public purpose in mind.
It is clear, from the unrelenting correspondence between yourself and the members of my administration, that your demands are not based in fact, or in concert with the intent granted legislative oversight. Your baseless, deleterious, and self-serving demands on government resources amounts to an abuse of public services and will no longer be endured.”

And finally, Dunleavy gave the directive that his Administration is not going to respond to her any longer:

“This letter serves as notice that all officials and staff, employed and serving the State of Alaska’s Executive Branch of government, will not be responding, or participating, in any matter that pertains to yourself, your office, or, currently, in your capacity as the chair of a committee. The resources of the State of Alaska are not yours to abuse for your own, as yet undiscemible, personal benefit. It is lamentable that the good citizens of Eagle River and Chugiak are deprived of meaningful representation by the actions of the person holding the office of Senator.

“I will not continue to subject the public resources of the State of Alaska to the mockery of a charade, disguised as public purpose.”

His letter is signed

“Sincerely,
Mike Dunleavy Governor”

House creates Ways and Means Committee for Spohnholz to run

21

The Alaska House majority voted to create a House Ways and Means Committee today, which is a special committee that could slow down progress in the House of Representatives’ bill-moving process. The House is already a month behind in its work for the 90-day session.

The vote was along majority lines, with Rep. Kelly Merrick of Eagle River falling in line with the proposal that ended up putting Rep. Ivy Spohnholz as the chair of this special committee. Spohnholz spoke forcefully in favor of creating the committee; she is a pro-income-tax Democrat.

It’s unclear what the committee’s full responsibility will be. A Ways and Means Committee can be whatever the makers want it to be. In the U.S. House, the Ways and Means Committee is the chief tax-writing committee.

Although 103 bills were read into the House today and referred to various committees, none of those committees was the Ways and Means Committee, because that vote to create the committee came later. In actuality, however, the Speaker can add the Ways and Means Committee to a list of committees to which bills can get referred at any time.

Years ago, the Republican caucus in the Alaska House had a Ways and Means Committee that had the focus of “missions and measures,” setting up mission statements for departments and measurements for whether departments were achieving their missions.

In 2007-2008, the special committee was created and chaired by Rep. Mike Hawker, with vice chair Rep. Anna Fairclough (now MacKinnon).

Among bills that were referred to it that year were HB 57, Amerada Hess oil royalty settlement money into the Permanent Fund; HB 68, a long-range fiscal plan; HB 395, repealing an estate tax on residents; and HJR 1, 5, and 35, having to do with transfers, revenue, and state debt.

Campbell: In politics, your word is your bond

By CRAIG E. CAMPBELL

In politics it is said that any publicity is good publicity so long as you are not in an obituary.  

Also in politics, there are two types of obituaries. The first is the obvious time when each of us gets to meet our maker. The second is when a politician commits political suicide and breaks their word, their bond, with their constituency.  

Unfortunately, Eagle River Republican Rep. Kelly Merrick unilaterally terminated her future representing District 14 Eagle River when she broke her bond by going back on her word. She couldn’t get elected dog catcher today, even if we elected dog catchers.

Just 100 days after getting elected to her second term in the Alaska House of Representatives, Merrick betrayed her constituents by being the single vote out of the 40 house seats to turn a numerical Republican majority, into the minority.  

While telling her constituents she “did not join a bi-partisan Democrat controlled House majority,” her words fell on deaf ears, as her actions resulted in a bi-partisan, Democrat controlled majority.  

This can only be explained in one of three ways. Either she knew exactly what she was doing and thought she could hoodwink her constituents into thinking she didn’t do something she did; or worst, she didn’t care about her constituents and used this opportunity to advance her own political future. The third option is that she just didn’t understand what she was doing.  

I know Kelly Merrick, and she is not dumb.  In fact, she is a shrewd devil who understood exactly what she was doing and thinks she can get away with it.  

The track record for Republicans forming bi-partisan Democrat controlled majorities is not good. In 2014, a few Republicans formed the Musk Ox Coalition and sided with Democrats. 

In the 2016 election, Musk Ox members Cathy Munoz and Jim Colver lost their races. In 2018, Musk Ox Republican Paul Seaton lost his primary election to Sarah Vance.  

While no longer called the Musk Ox Coalition, Republicans continued to broker Democrat led coalitions and in the 2020 election, Jennifer Johnston, Chuck, Kopp, and Gabrielle LeDoux all lost their primary races while Gary Knopp unfortunately died in a tragic plane crash.  

The history of Republicans supporting Democrat-led coalitions does not appear too good for political careers.

Why would Merrick break her bond with her constituents by going back on her word?  Eagle River is one of the most conservative districts in Alaska.  She understood that District 14 would erupt, and it did last night by passing a resolution censuring her and committing to never provide any future support. Obviously, she must have no intention of returning to either the House or Senate.    

Maybe Merrick thinks she has a shot at winning the governor’s race in 2022.  That doesn’t make sense. Her husband Joey Merrick is the union boss at Laborers Local 341.  

Coincidently, Vince Beltrami just retired from the AFL-CIO boss position and word has it he is considering a run for governor.  

There is no way Merrick would be allowed to split the union vote against Beltrami, and Republicans certainly aren’t going to elect a Benedict Arnold to the governorship. So I don’t think Merrick has any intention of running for governor.  

But there are two other plausible possibilities. The first is that Merrick may be aiming to run against Senator Murkowski in 2022. With the political suicide cliff-jumping Sen. Lisa Murkowski seems to be taking with Republicans, this might make a lot of sense.  The problem is, Murkowski has a lot of liberal support and unless Merrick switches her long-time pro-life stance, she would have an uphill battle against Murkowski, who has a track record and can turn out liberal Republicans, moderate Democrats, and the rural vote. My bet is Merrick is not running against Murkowski.

Is she targeting Congressman Don Young’s seat? Merrick is more conservative than Alyce Galvin and could curry Democrat favor these next two years as co-chair of House Finance. With union backing and building a strong moderate base, Merrick would certainly be a challenge to Don Young.   

However, there is that pesky Republican primary she would have to face, that’s if she remained a Republican. Ballot Measure 2, which was clearly put forth by its sponsors to bolster Sen. Murkowski’s changes at another Senate term, may help Merrick in her quest for a House seat. But Young has been a stalwart at supporting Alaska, and he has union backing. So, Merrick is most probably praying the Young retires and she gets to take a shoot at an open seat, otherwise this path to victory for her is a dead-end.

My bet is she will run for lieutenant governor, supporting Beltrami, to form a union backed gubernatorial team in 2022. A Beltrami/Merrick team would draw from numerous, traditionally conflicting bases. That should worry Republicans to the max. A Beltrami/Merrick executive branch would be the final nail in the coffin of a death sentence for Alaska.  

Merrick is probably considering the prospects of switching parties by 2022 to gain Democrat support for a lieutenant governor run. For anyone who may even think for a second of supporting her, consider her word. She made a bond with District 14 to never join a Democrat led coalition, so regardless of how she tries to spin it, she lied and was the kingpin that allowed Louise Stutes to become Speaker of the House and form committees controlled by Democrats. 

Let me end on a positive note: I am positive Kelly Merrick will never again be elected to any position in Alaska, ever.

Craig E. Campbell served on the Anchorage Assembly between 1986 and 1995 and later as Alaska’s Tenth Lieutenant Governor.  He was the previous Chief Executive Officer and President for Alaska Aerospace Corporation.  He retired from the Alaska National Guard as Lieutenant General (AKNG) and holds the concurrent retired Federal rank of Major General (USAF).

Committees accepted by House Majority, 22-17

In a 22-17 vote, the drama ended and the Committee assignments have been made for the Alaska House of Representatives.

The report has been amended.

Some changes were made to the report. Rep. Tom McKay is now on Resources and Rep. Kevin McCabe is now on Community and Regional Affairs.

Although last-minute vote-hostage-taking took place by Rep. Geran Tarr, who was withholding her vote on the committee assignments, the procedure went smoothly Thursday morning. Three Republicans are aligned with the Democrat-majority coalition: Speaker Louise Stutes, Rep. Kelly Merrick, and nominally Rep. Sara Rasmussen, who says she is not part of the coalition, but voted with them to approve the committee assignments. Rasmussen, representing South Anchorage, was awarded a coveted seat on Finance.

The minority caucus of Republicans is comprised of 18 members, with Rep. Cathy Tilton as minority leader and Rep. Laddie Shaw as minority whip.

With committees established, over 100 bills were read across the floor and assigned to those committees.

The House Minority Caucus is now made up of Ben Carpenter, Mike Cronk, David Eastman, Ron Gillham, DeLena Johnson, James Kaufman, Chris Kurka, Bart LeBon, Kevin McCabe, Ken McCarty, Tom McKay, David Nelson, Mike Prax, George Rauscher, Laddie Shaw, Steve Thompson, Cathy Tilton, and Sarah Vance.

The majority caucus has Matt Claman, Harriet Drummond, Bryce Edgmon, Zack Fields, Neal Foster, Sara Hannan, Grier Hopkins, Andy Josephson, Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins, Daniel Ortiz, Josiah Patkotak, Calvn Schrage, Liz Snyder, Ivy Spohnholz, Andi Story, Chris Tuck, Adam Wool, Tiffany Zulkosky, all of whom are reliable Democrats or pretend undeclareds, and Republicans Louise Stutes and Kelly Merrick.

Sarah Rasmussen, also a Republican, has insisted she is a member of neither caucus.