Friday, January 2, 2026
Home Blog Page 1112

Vaccine passport: Bethel to allow vaccinated passengers only on bus

The “vaccine passport” era has begun, or at least will begin soon in Bethel, Alaska.

While states, airlines companies and Big Tech are pushing for a federal standard for “vaccine passports,” the small town of Bethel, in the Yukon-Kuskokwim Delta, announced that beginning Monday, only those vaccinated for Covid-19 will be allowed to ride on buses.

As of last week, over 35 percent of the Bethel population age 16 and older had received at least one dose of the anti-Covid vaccine. Bethel is doing what some of the big players are already doing.

Today, British Airways and Ryan Air announced they are starting to allow fliers to provide their vaccination and test results, along with their passport numbers and other personal dates, during bookings. The airlines hope that the move will be able to show various countries and provinces that passengers are inoculated.

According to the Wall Street Journal,  Singapore Airlines Ltd., Emirates Airline, and Qatar Airways have been working with the International Air Transport Association, an airline trade body, to test a so-called Travel Pass. “The system, which includes a mobile app, aims to allow passengers to demonstrate Covid-19 vaccination and testing records, while also identifying testing and vaccination requirements for different locations and local testing centers accessible during travel. Ethiopian Airlines said Wednesday it was partnering with the African Union to try out a similar travel pass for intracontinental flights,” the newspaper reported.

Israel has begun issuing vaccination passports for people who want to use gymnasiums and other public facilities.

The question of proof-of-vaccine concerns privacy advocates, who say that as government policy, it raises red flags, but without federal oversight, local “vaccine passport” rules are likely to be discriminatory, confusing, and subject to fraud.

Last month, President Joe Biden issued an executive order asking federal agencies to explore how to create a digital Covid-19 vaccination certificate system.

Where the American Rescue Plan will be spent in Alaska

19

According to the White House, the American Rescue Plan will provide Alaska with:

  • $1.45 billion in state fiscal relief
  • $250 million in local fiscal relief
  • More than $370 million in relief for K-12 schools
  • Economic impact payments of up to $1,400 per person (above the $600 per person provided in December) for more than 430,000 adults and 193,000 children. This is 84% of all adults in the state and 85% of all children in the state
  • Additional relief of up to $1,600 per child through the Child Tax Credit to the families of 167,000 children
  • Additional relief of up to nearly $1,000 through the Earned Income Tax Credit to 41,000 childless workers
  • Marketplace health insurance premiums $2,300 lower per month for a 60-year old couple earning $75,000 per year

NTSB: Rep. Gary Knopp had severe visual impairments, had failed medical clearance

50

The late Rep. Gary Knopp, who died in a midair plane collision last July in Soldotna, had been denied a medical certificate by the FAA numerous times. He had diagnosed glaucoma that impaired his field of vision, according to a report by the National Transportation Safety Board.

The report confirms an earlier report by the NTSB that revealed some of the same information, but this time in greater detail.

The NTSB has released new details about the July 31, 2020 collision that also took the life of the pilot of the other plane, Gregory Bell, and his passengers. Knopp’s Piper PA-12 Super Cruiser aircraft hit Bell’s deHavilland DHC-2 Beaver near Longmere Lake. There were no survivors.

Knopp was flying without medical clearance, as he had been denied his required medical certificate due to his eyesight several years earlier. He had glaucoma, which was diagnosed in 2011, and had had surgery on his right eye for a cataract in 2012.

“In March 2012, the FAA received an eye evaluation report from the Piper pilot’s ophthalmologist. In this report, the ophthalmologist noted that the Piper pilot had medically controlled open-angle glaucoma with visual field loss in both eyes, had undergone previous laser surgery for glaucoma in both eyes (left eye September 24, 2010, and right eye October 8, 2010), and required ophthalmology followup every 4 months,” the NTSB reported.

The Alaska Regional Flight Surgeon sent a denial letter to the Knopp onJune 18, 2012. The letter stated that the Knopp did not meet the general medical standards for first-, second-, or third-class medical certification. Knopp requested reconsideration. The FAA received an ophthalmological evaluation for glaucoma form from Knopp’s ophthalmologist, dated July 2, 2012. This form again noted the open-angle glaucoma diagnosis, with reduced visual fields in both eyes.

“Based on that form, and on the rest of the Piper pilot’s FAA medical certification file, the Aerospace Medical Certification Division sent another denial letter to the Piper pilot, dated July 23, 2012,” the NTSB reported.

Read the complete NTSB medical report at this link.

The families of the deceased passengers from the other plane are suing the Knopp estate, claiming that Knopp “committed negligent acts and/or omissions” by operating an aircraft without a valid medical certificate. The suits also claim Knopp’s widow Helen knew her husband was not supposed to be solo piloting.

New House rules: That amendment is unconstitutional, since it refers to abortion

In the Alaska House of Representatives, there’s a novel interpretation of Mason’s Manual of Legislative Procedure: If a budget committee member thinks a budget proposal is unconstitutional, it may not even be offered as a budget amendment.

The new interpretation of lawmaking unfolded when Rep. Sarah Vance of Homer offered an amendment to the Court System budget that would subtract $334,700 from Fiscal Year 2022.

That is the approximate amount spent on state-funded elective abortions. Her explanation was that it’s the Legislature’s intent that the State shall not pay for elective abortions.

That $334,700 was the sum that the Dunleavy Administration had paid back to the court system after the Alaska Superior Court declared it unconstitutional for him to reduce the court’s budget by the amount that the State is paying for elective abortions — a result of the court’s interpretation of the Constitution, which it says allows for abortion.

Vance’s amendment was the first to be moved in the Judiciary Finance subcommittee on Monday. But immediately, Rep. Matt Claman called for a point of order, and asked the amendment be ruled out of order because, he said, it was unconstitutional.

“We all take an oath to uphold the Constitution of the State of Alaska, with three independent branches of government. It is uniquely the province of the courts to say what the law is,” Claman read from his prepared remarks. “When we support the decisions of the Alaska Supreme Court, and support fair and impartial courts, we strengthen the rule of law.”

Claman went on to say that the amount Vance was trying to cut is the exact amount the governor attempted to veto last year only to run up against the decision by Superior Court Judge Jennifer Henderson.

Henderson said the governor could not veto the court’s money as a way to get back at the courts for forcing the state to pay for elective abortions. Gov. Mike Dunleavy did not appeal that ruling.

“The courts decision confirmed that cuts may be made for any reason, but not for an improper reason. Attempting to punish the courts for properly interpreting the Alaska Constitution is an improper reason for making a budget cut and the proposed cut is an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers. And with that I would ask the chair rule this amendment out of order,” Claman said.

Rep. David Eastman came to the defense of the amendment, citing the Mason’s Manual rule that says no proposal may be ruled out of order based on constitutionality, as that is for the voting body to decide.

Chairman Josephson seemed befuddled for several moments, appearing unsure of what to do. Should he rule an amendment out of order because his fellow Democrat caucus member said it is unconstitutional? Or is an amendment allowed to be voted on, and have the budget subcommittee members decide if it’s proper or not?

Josephson then waxed political: Of all the claims made against the governor by the Recall Dunleavy Committee, “this was the most serious. The others I found relatively picayune. That is, not terribly significant.”

“The problem is you could do this with every ruling of the court,” Josephson argued. With any court ruling a lawmaker disagrees with, he or she could offer a decrement amendment to the court’s budget in the relevant amount.

“You could do this all day long and you’d be left with no money to operate the court system,” he said. “The governor in both FY 20 and 21 has or is paying these sums and seems to acknowledge he can’t do what he did.”

Vance, along with Rep. Chris Kurka and Rep. David Eastman, argued that it is up to the committee itself to make the determination if the amendment to dock the amount from the court budget is proper, and it isn’t proper for the chair of the committee to decide on the constitutionality of the motion.

Democrats on the committee ultimately voted to uphold the ruling of the chair, with Vance, Kurka, Eastman, and DeLena Johnson voting against the ruling.

Thus, precedent appeared to be set in the House Judiciary Committee on March 15, 2021: If the committee chair doesn’t like an amendment because he or she feels it is unconstitutional, the amendment can aborted before even being offered for a vote.

Jamie Allard: The hour is here for us to decide the future of Anchorage

17

By JAMIE ALLARD

In the next couple of days, you’ll receive a very important document in the mail – it’s your mail-in ballot for the election that has just started for Anchorage mayor, school board members, as well as for the recall of an Assemblyman and a number of borrowing measures called bonds.

It may look like junk mail to you, but it’s anything but that. Don’t toss it! It’s your passport to a better future for your family. Treasure it, and guard it with your life, and then mark it and mail it in right away. Your ballot is your say about the quality of life in Anchorage.

If you, like I do, think that Anchorage is seriously off track, then you have a decision to make: Who do you trust to lead Anchorage for the next three years? Who represents your values the most? Is it time for Anchorage to reclaim law and order, and make our neighborhoods safe again? Is it time to have sensible policies, or are we OK with the decline and fall of Alaska’s greatest city?

This election is about our future and whether we’ll continue to plunge headfirst into the progressive vision of a dystopian future, or if we’re planting our feet now for sensible, responsible leadership.

The people of Anchorage are wonderfully diverse, with a strength and grit that comes from being hardy Alaskans. We have what it takes to make Anchorage thrive for our children, and their children. 

But we have all felt the weight of our city struggling under failed leadership for six years. Anchorage is our home. Now is our chance to make our city the best city it can be.

Voting is a privilege, hard-earned and secured by the sacrifice of so many lives. We know that freedom isn’t free, and we must continue to fight for it every day. This election isn’t about red or blue, left or right, but about leadership.

Moving forward, we must work together. And that begins with that ballot in our hands. Together we will stand up, do our civic duty, and vote our principles. 

Friends, there are times in history we can point to where one vote made all the difference in the course of human events. This could very well be one of those times.

A better future for our city depends on us doing this one small act of citizenship.

It is our time. Our time to vote.

Jamie Allard is the Anchorage Assemblywoman representing Chugiak / Eagle River.

Dan Fagan: There could be a big surprise on Election Day in Anchorage

By DAN FAGAN

If you’ve lost all hope Alaska’s largest city will ever return to the bustling, prosperous, and mostly safe town it once was, consider Michelle Bryant. 

Bryant drives a big truck all around Anchorage delivering fresh produce to restaurants. All day she works with restaurant workers and owners. They have become her friends. 

Her job gives her a front row seat to the economic devastation that the unconstitutional lockdowns employed by the Marxists running the city have callously mandated, while ignoring public testimony. Their tyranny has hit Anchorage’s eateries like a tidal wave, washing away jobs, and forcing businesses to close permanently.  

Bryant has witnessed up close – maybe more than anyone in Anchorage – the destructive potential of a power-hungry, micro-managing government to destroy lives. The experience has changed her profoundly. 

But Bryant didn’t just belly ache and complain about what she witnessed in such an up-close and personal way. She took action. 

Bryant began to show up at Assembly meetings to testify. She boldly faced the tyrants ruining so many of her friend’s jobs and businesses. 

Bryant describes herself as someone who never had much interest in politics most of her life. But now she’s at the front lines of the battle.  

At one meeting Bryant confronted the thin-skinned Assemblyman Christopher Constant for not giving respect and attention to those who came to testify. Constant whined to Assembly Chairman Felix Rivera that Bryant had the audacity to publicly say Constant’s name on the record.

“She called out my name Mr. Chair,” screeched Constant like a four-year-old crying about being teased on a playground. 

The big question is how many other Michelle Bryant’s are out there.  The non-political turned political, engaged, involved, angry. The ones who can’t wait to vote the bums out.  

Disgraced and former Mayor Ethan Berkowitz, the current illegal mayor, Austin Quinn-Davidson, and the Marxist six remaining on the Anchorage Assembly transformed Anchorage into a city that’s barely recognizable.  Especially downtown.  

The newly engaged and impassioned may not go to the lengths of Bryant, who has taken the time to show up at Assembly meetings, but they certainly determined in their hearts to vote. 

I received an email from someone recently telling me his wife, for the first time in years, will vote in the mayor’s race after seeing what’s happened to Anchorage under current leadership. 

She’s also hosting gatherings with many of her friends hoping to educate them on who to vote for.  

There’s no candidate that embodies the current direction the city is heading than uber-Leftist Forrest Dunbar. Dunbar is such a radical, he could potentially be worse than Berkowitz, if you can even imagine that. 

What if establishment types underestimated the pure rage brewing among the public over the failed leadership in Anchorage. What if Anchorage isn’t quite as blue as supporters of “Bathroom” Bill Evans think it is? They’re banking on a mushy middle candidate.

There is no mushy middle constituency. 

Conservative heavy weights like Andy Clary, Dave Stieren, Rick Rydell, Rebecca Logan, and former Mayor Dan Sullivan have thrown their considerable influence behind Evans, assuming a conservative is no longer electable in Alaska’s most populated city.  

But have they factored in the Michelle Bryants of the world and the many others like her? I doubt it.

As much as Dunbar is the face of the hard left turn the city’s recently taken, Dave Bronson is clearly the most formidable opposition. 

Bronson told publisher of this website, Suzanne Downing, during their latest recorded podcast, the polls show he’s the guy to beat, with all other candidates polling at 8% or below, with the exception of Dunbar.

Is it possible conservative candidate Dave Bronson could get 45% plus 1 of the votes and avoid a runoff with Dunbar?

Don’t rule it out. Once conservatives realize Mike Robbins and Evans have little or no chance, they most likely will go with Bronson.  

I’m not predicting Bronson avoids the runoff. But I wouldn’t be shocked if he does. 

Dan Fagan hosts the #1 rated morning drive talk show in Alaska on Newsradio 650 KENI. 

Running against Anchorage? Forrest Dunbar does massive publicity for Must Read Alaska

Forrest Dunbar, Assemblyman and candidate for Anchorage mayor, has sent a fundraising pitch to every high-propensity voter in Anchorage, telling them that Must Read Alaska is a danger to the city, and he’s the one to stop it.

In his letter, the far-left candidate said supporters of Must Read Alaska embrace conspiratorial, anti-science rhetoric that “would have us ignore COVID” rather than face it head on.

Further, he calls out the “toxic partisanship” of Must Read Alaska, and those who hold crowded fundraisers where people don’t wear masks.

Must Read Alaska’s Suzanne Downing has sent the Dunbar campaign a $5 donation.

“This is publicity that money just can’t buy,” said Downing, who founded Must Read Alaska in 2015, after the Anchorage Daily News refused to print letters to the editor from conservatives. “Sending him a $5 donation was the least I could do to pay him back. Thousands of people learned about Must Read Alaska from Mr. Dunbar.”

Must Read Alaska readers who would rather support this conservative endeavor, instead of the toxic partisanship of a mayoral candidate of far Left, are welcome to help keep Must Read Alaska strong and on the right side of Alaska public debate.

Send your donations to Must Read Alaska through this link, or at either of the PayPal portals at the top right side of this page. Thank you for helping us stay strong, independent, and fighting for the rights of Alaskans.

Sullivan says yes on Haaland confirmation, releases statement explaining vote

102

Sen. Dan Sullivan was one of the votes in the Senate today that confirmed radical Democrat Rep. Deb Haaland as Secretary of the Interior, releasing the following statement explaining the rationale behind his vote, and the promises he received from her during his several conversations with the New Mexico Native American-Norwegian.

Must Read Alaska is printing it in full:

I. Introduction

Every vote I take in this Chamber, I try to cast based on what I think will be best for the constituents I represent, my state and our country. Sometimes, of course, that’s not always so easy to discern. 

The vote to confirm Congresswoman Deb Haaland was one of the most difficult I have made during my time in the U.S. Senate.

In normal times, I would have firmly opposed the confirmation of Congresswoman Haaland

As a congresswoman, Haaland took positions publicly—cosponsoring the Green New Deal, prohibiting all gas and oil leasing on federal lands, and displaying hostility toward Alaska Native people and systems just because they are different from the Lower 48 model she is familiar with—that I believe would clearly negatively impact Alaska and America. In normal times, this would be an easy “no” vote. 

But these are not normal times. Our state’s economy and our working families are under pressure, stress and assault due to the pandemic and the Biden administration’s initial hostile actions against Alaska and our resource development sector. I believe that my vote to confirm Congresswoman Haaland as Secretary of the Interior may enhance my ability to successfully advocate for a ceasefire in the Biden administration’s war on the Alaska economy and working families. We need all the help we can get, particularly from the head of an agency, the Department of the Interior, that wields enormous power over our state and our economy.  

It’s also important to keep in mind that a “no” vote would’ve made no difference in Congresswoman Haaland’s confirmation. She was going to get confirmed with or without my vote. A “no” vote could have very well diminished my ability to get the Biden administration to limit the damage it is already doing to Alaska.

Further, despite some of her radical views on energy as a congresswoman, in my meetings with Congresswoman Haaland, I was able to get her to acknowledge and recognize the importance of the oil and gas sector for Alaska and America, especially its good-paying jobs; the benefits of mining in terms of jobs and critical supplies for our nation; the significant difference between the way in which federal laws treat Alaska Natives versus Lower 48 Native Americans;  the critical importance of being able to hunt and fish on federal lands, and the necessity to work with the State of Alaska on these issues; and the requirement to follow the law and congressional mandates as they relate to the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA), the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA), and oil and gas leasing requirement in federal legislation relating to the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) and the National Petroleum Reserve of Alaska (NPR-A).

I was also able to get a firm commitment from her to meet personally with a wide variety of Alaskans from many different backgrounds, including the following groups: 

  • People of King Cove and the North Slope Borough
  • Mining community
  • Oil and gas workers and North Slope contractors
  • Hunters, trappers, and angling community, and State of Alaska fish and game managers
  • Alaska Native leaders, including tribal leaders, the Alaska Federation of Natives (AFN), regional and village corporations.
  • Alaska veterans

The purpose of these meetings will generally be the same: to let Congresswoman Haaland hear directly from hundreds of Alaskans that the decisions she ends up making about our state—for example, on the Willow project in the National Petroleum Reserve of Alaska—will directly impact the lives of thousands of Alaskans, either positively or negatively. 

Congresswoman Haaland is the daughter of a mother who served in the Navy and a father who served in the Marines and was awarded the Silver Star and Purple Heart in Vietnam. I expect her to understand the value of integrity and to honor these and other commitments she made to me and my fellow Alaskans about our economic future and opportunities.

II. Alaska Under Siege by the Biden Administration 

As I stated before, these are not normal times for Alaska and our country.  

  • The pandemic has hit Alaska particularly hard, especially the energy, tourism, and commercial fishing sectors, with thousands of jobs lost.
  • The Secretary of the Interior plays an oversized role in our economy, jobs, and future, given that approximately 66% of Alaska is federal land.
  • I was honored to work closely with the Trump administration’s Interior secretaries to achieve several historic wins for our state involving resource development projects, the creation of good jobs in Alaska, access to our federal lands, and the rights of Alaska Natives, particularly Vietnam veterans.
  • Certain members of the Biden administration are focused on reversing all of this Alaska progress which will deepen the challenges for our state, killing jobs by the thousands in our resource development sector, in what I have decried as Biden’s war on Alaska’s economy and working families; but many of the policy decisions of the Biden administration in this regard have not yet been finalized.
  • Republicans, unfortunately, lost control of the U.S. Senate; Congresswoman Haaland is guaranteed to be confirmed as the new Secretary of the Interior, whether I vote for or against her confirmation. 

This is the new reality and context in which I decided my vote. The key issue to me was this: How would a “yes” or a “no” for Congresswoman Haaland help me influence her and the Biden administration to take actions that will limit harm for Alaska, especially our working families. After watching her nomination hearings closely and having had close to three hours of meetings with her myself, I have concluded that a “yes” vote is more likely than a “no” vote to create the opportunity to build a relationship with her and her team, a relationship that could enable me to influence the Department of the Interior’s decisions and action on critical Alaska issues that could benefit our state, like moving forward on the Willow project, which is estimated to create thousands of jobs and bring billions of dollars in revenue to the State of Alaska and North Slope Borough. 

I took this vote with eyes wide open, however, knowing full well that a number of officials in the Biden administration and their radical environmental allies are hellbent on shutting down our state and crushing opportunities for Alaskans, but I thought if my “yes” vote might be able to influence decisions about Alaska in any positive way, then it might be worth it. This is particularly true given the precarious state of Alaska’s economy and the fact that, internally, the Biden administration is still having key debates about the direction of their energy and climate change policies, as well as their decisions about resource development in our great state. For example, President Biden has recently told labor leaders that he is “all for natural gas” production and jobs, but self-styled “President of the world,” John Kerry, says that the U.S. should curtail the production of oil and natural gas and the good-paying jobs in this sector.

I have also seen some evidence that the ability to engage with senior Biden administration officials can help produce results that limit harm to our state. In late January, I received urgent messages from certain Alaska oil and gas contractors that they were about to lay off close to 200 employees on the North Slope as a result of the Biden administration’s 60-day moratorium on Department of the Interior decisions. My staff and I reached out to senior Biden officials and argued forcefully that their moratorium was being interpreted to destroy close to 200 great paying jobs in Alaska. These Biden officials worked to clarify the meaning of the moratorium and these Alaskan workers, whose jobs were at risk, continued their important work on the Slope. 

III. Advocating for Alaska Under Difficult Circumstances

I recognize Congresswoman Haaland’s role as the first indigenous woman to be Secretary of the Interior is historic and important to many Alaskans, as was the confirmation of Tara Sweeney, the first Alaska Native to serve as Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs. Assistant Secretary Sweeney did an outstanding job for our state and nation. I hope Congresswoman Haaland can follow Assistant Secretary Sweeney’s example of understanding the many differences under federal law that exist between Alaska Native peoples and Lower 48 Native Americans, while still respecting both groups and endeavoring to provide all of our nation’s First Peoples with opportunities to thrive, both economically and culturally. 

As I said, this vote was one of the most difficult I have made during my time in the U.S. Senate. I am proud of my record as Alaska’s Attorney General, Natural Resources Commissioner, and U.S. Senator as a long-time and relentless champion, advocate, and fighter for my state’s resource development sector, and the economic opportunity and working families that benefit from it.

It is my hope, but certainly no guarantee, that my vote to confirm Congresswoman Haaland as Secretary of the Interior may enhance my ability to successfully advocate for a ceasefire in the Biden administration’s war on the Alaska economy and working families. We need all the help we can get, particularly from the head of an agency, the Department of the Interior, that wields enormous power over our state. A “no” vote, on the other hand, would likely have diminished my ability to successfully advocate for a strong resource development sector in Alaska, and would not have changed the outcome of her confirmation as Secretary of the Interior. 

I know this is a difficult time for all of us, and I appreciate the support, advice and input that so many Alaskans have given me throughout the years. As I said, I can’t guarantee that this vote—or others that I will take during this administration—will yield the results we want. But I do know that because Republicans lost control of the Senate, our hand is not nearly as strong as it recently was. For this reason, Alaskans must all work together to make the best of a difficult situation with an administration that will likely work to reverse the recent historic progress we’ve made for our state in many areas. You have my continued commitment to work relentlessly—cooperating when possible, fighting when I must—to limit the Biden administration’s harmful actions against our state in the best way I know how. That was the ultimate context in which I made my vote today.

House passes bipartisan resolution opposing Biden on ANWR moratorium

10

The Alaska House on Monday passed a resolution calling out the Biden Administration’s moratorium on all oil and gas leasing in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). HJR 12 passed the House 35-3, “reflecting a united effort by Alaskans to defend their state’s energy rights against a hostile federal administration,” according to a statement from House Republicans.

Those opposing it were House Democrat Rep. Liz Snyder, Sara Hannan, and Geran Tarr. Democrat Reps. Zack Fields and Grier Hopkins were not present.

Sponsored by Rep. Rauscher of Sutton and co-sponsored by 23 members, the resolution also asks the Biden Administration to enforce the law as written. Federal law explicitly calls for “leasing development, production and transportation of oil and gas” in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.

“With this resolution, the Alaska House of Representatives have joined our voice with the majority of Alaskans and North Slope residents,” Rep. Rauscher said. “We send a unified message to the Federal Government, asking them to work with us, rather than against us, in developing our resources and empowering our communities.”

All House Republican caucus members voted in favor of the resolution and were joined by 16 members of the Democrat-led coalition.

“As representatives, we have a duty to stand up for Alaskan industry and jobs,” Republican Caucus Leader Cathy Tilton (R-Chugiak/MatSu) said. “That’s why our caucus will continue fighting for an Alaska open for business.”