Monday, May 5, 2025
Home Blog Page 942

Alaska joins 17-state coalition to fight climate change lawsuit by Earth Guardians

Alaska Attorney General Treg Taylor has joined a 17-state coalition of attorneys general to intervene in Juliana v. United States, a lawsuit brought on behalf of 21 children, which states that their constitutional rights are being violated by climate change and government policies that do not stop climate change.

The youth, who say their rights to life, liberty, and property is being violated, are scheduled to be in court for oral arguments on a legal motion on June 25 in a case that has dragged on for over five years. Earth Guardians is the youths’ legal team.

The 17 attorneys general have moved to intervene after both Presidents Barack Obama and Donald Trump administrations sought to have the case dismissed, arguing that the U.S. Constitution gives the judicial branch no such policy-making power, which resides exclusively in the legislative and executive branches.

The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit agreed with the federal government’s position and in early 2020, ordered the district court to dismiss the case. The court said that the matters should be addressed by the executive and legislative branches, not the courts.

The  U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon failed to dismiss the case. Now, the Biden administration is preparing to have settlement talks with the plaintiffs after a U.S. District Court judge ordered attorneys for the plaintiffs and the Department of Justice to convene for a settlement conference.

The court also scheduled oral argument on the youth plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint, to be held telephonically on Friday, June 25, 2021 .

When judging a similar lawsuit in Kanuk v. State of Alaska in 2014, the Alaska Supreme Court reached the same conclusion as the Ninth Circuit, that it is inappropriate and unlawful for courts to hear this type of case.

“Both the Ninth Circuit and the Alaska Supreme Court have already decided that this type of lawsuit is outside of any court’s jurisdiction,” said Attorney General Taylor. “With the change in federal administration and its recent litigation positions, there is a significant chance the current federal defendant will not adequately represent Alaska’s interest in bringing this case to its already-decided close.”

Alaska, joined Alabama and Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, and West Virginia, in filing the motion to intervene.

Kelly Tshibaka launches digital ad campaign over 435 days before 2022 primary election

It’s evident that Kelly Tshibaka means business about running for U.S. Senate against Sen. Lisa Murkowski. This week, online ads for the Republican’s candidacy started showing up on Alaskans’ internet browsers.

Tshibaka’s digital ad talks about her upbringing in Alaska, and how the state gave her family a leg up. She says Murkowski has enabled President Joe Biden to take apart Alaska’s oil and gas economy, which is the job sector that would give other families the opportunities hers had.

The ad is running on social media sites, some websites, and streaming services like YouTube. It’s unusual to start an ad campaign so soon, but Tshibaka still has name recognition hurdles to clear, while Murkowski is a household name in Alaska. The ad buy also shows that Tshibaka is confident of her fund-raising ability.

Read: New Democrat poll shows Tshibaka winning in ranked-choice voting in Alaska

“Every Alaskan story is unique,” Tshibaka says in the ad. “Mine started in the ‘70s when my parents moved here. They were homeless for a while, but eventually they made it into the middle class. These days, though, they wouldn’t have that same opportunity.”

Today’s Alaska is not the same place, and that worries her as an Alaskan.

“That’s because with Lisa Murkowski’s support, the liberals in D.C. are attacking our resource industry. They’re shutting down our jobs. Every Alaskan should have the same opportunity that my parents had – to work an honest job, put a roof over their head, and maybe even send their little girl to college,” Tshibaka says in the ad.

Acting in Anchorage: LaFrance takes over as acting chair, Constant becomes acting vice chair of Assembly

Anchorage Assemblywoman Suzanne LaFrance of South Anchorage is the new acting chair of the Assembly, while Chris Constant of downtown has become acting vice chair.

The two replace Acting Chair Felix Rivera and Acting Vice Chair John Weddleton, but the situation is temporary.

The Assembly could reorganize again once Mayor-elect Dave Bronson is sworn into office and Acting Mayor Austin Quinn-Davidson returns to her seat on the Assembly, representing West Anchorage.

Chris Constant

The Anchorage government has been in “acting” mode since Oct. 23, when former Mayor Ethan Berkowitz resigned after a scandal erupted. Quinn-Davidson, who was chair of the Assembly, became acting mayor that day, temporarily reorganizing the Assembly and blocking anyone from taking her seat. It’s possible that Quinn-Davidson will not actually return to the Assembly, as she is rumored to be a pick for a position in the Biden Administration.

Warren Buffett major investors land in Juneau, talk with governor about Alaska energy potential

Berkshire Hathaway executives flew into Juneau to scout the state for investment potential for energy, logistics, ports, and the cargo hub of the Ted Stevens Anchorage International Airport. They met with Gov. Mike Dunleavy in Juneau on Tuesday. The Dunleavy Administration has been inviting private capital investment in Alaska, and investment houses are flush with cash right now.

Berkshire Hathaway, founded by Warren Buffett, is one of the most reputable companies in the world with one of the strongest balance sheets. It has $150 billion in cash, twice the size of the Alaska Permanent Fund.

For an apex investor to come to Alaska and meet with the governor, something had to have happened. As it turns out, Gov. Dunleavy started the conversation with Buffett a year ago in a letter he sent inviting Warren or his lieutenants to come learn about Alaska, and about potential for renewable energy investments in Alaska.

Berkshire Hathaway Energy in recent years expanded into solar, wind hydro, and geothermal projects and has one of the largest renewable energy portfolios in the U.S.

Renewables in Alaska are an untapped potential, including the newer technology of “pumped hydro,” which is an ability to use excess wind electricity to reverse-pump water back into a reservoir to store for later use as hydro energy when the wind dies down. This would open up a whole new world for smaller communities shackled with higher energy costs, sources say.

Tim Barto: Why are people not working?

By TIM BARTO

Employers want to hire employees but can’t get people to apply for or accept the jobs. This phenomenon is unknown in American history, and it’s one that does not seem to make any sense after 14 months of layoffs, business closings, and general economic hardship.  

Can it be that Americans are taking in so much money through unemployment compensation and other government benefits that going to work is, well, more work than it’s worth?  

Logic seems to answer that question with an unequivocal “Yes,” but the Biden Administration and others on the president’s side of the aisle argue that stories of people opting for government handouts instead of seeking work are anecdotal; that it’s just a theory without studies or statistics to back it up. The president says people want to work, but there are millions of job openings in the country that are going unfilled.

So let us look at some numbers and also hear some anecdotal stories from Alaskans who have been impacted by the current situation. These personal stories are reflective of what’s going on in the real world. To slough them off because they go against what someone wants to be true is to be in denial.  So, let’s listen to the stories and then make up our minds about whether a causal relationship exists.

A view of the national situation through Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers shows that in February 2020, the last month before the coronavirus pandemic struck the United States, there were 6.9 million job openings, and the unemployment rate was 3.6%.  

BLS’s most recent report tallied the current number of nationwide job openings at the end of March 2021 at 8.1 million. The United States’ unemployment rate for April 2021 was 6.1%.  In Alaska, it was slightly worse at 6.7%, which computes to 23,600 Alaskans out of work. Nationally, there are 9.8 million people who are currently categorized as unemployed, meaning there are 1.7 million more people without jobs than there are jobs available, but . . . that still means there are 8.1 million jobs in the United States waiting to be filled. 

The largest number of these available jobs are in hospitality industries such as hotels and restaurants, what BLS refers to as the accommodation and food services fields.  

Speaking of food services, a new restaurant, Lime Leaf by Basil Ginger, opened in my hometown of Eagle River earlier this year. Eagle River likes its eating establishments, and new restaurants, especially unique ones, pique our interests. Lime Leaf opened to such rave reviews and was doing such bang-up business from the start that they had to go to reservations only. And then, according to their own social media page, tragedy struck, and their head chef had to leave due to a family emergency. But there’s more to the story.  Their post continued, stating “. . . on top of that, we have had trouble getting enough staff.”

Staff for a restaurant means waiters, waitresses, cooks, and dishwashers.  Restaurants have been hammered over the past year by Covid-19 fears and, even more so, by government-mandated shutdowns.  Waiters, waitresses, cooks, and dishwashers have been out of work.  People seeking entry level jobs, like dishwashing, have a chance at getting their foot in the door for a paid job, yet this restaurant had trouble getting enough staff.  

My own 26-year-old son was furloughed by the local university earlier this year. Having moved into a new apartment the same week his pink notice arrived, he filed for unemployment compensation to bridge the gap until his flood of resumes struck paydirt. If felt like forever to him, but it wasn’t actually too long before he had a couple job offers from which to choose. They weren’t as lucrative as the job he’d had with the university, but they were paying jobs with benefits.  

“Pop,” he told me, “I’m only going to be making $30 more every two weeks than I was getting from unemployment.”  I was incredulous, but he was telling the truth, although unknown to him it wasn’t the complete truth.

It turns out my son is actually bringing home less money than he was getting from unemployment, as his gross income has the usual deductions – federal taxes, social security taxes, retirement account contributions, and medical insurance premiums – all adding up to a net income that is $300 less per month than what he was getting on the dole. He is happy to be working and productive, but he admits to seeing how people could be influenced to stay home and play X-Box instead of driving into work for less money.  

Oh yeah, driving. He has to spend money on gas, which is less money in his pocket. People collecting unemployment don’t have to spend money to drive to work.  

So how much do unemployed Alaskans get in unemployment compensation and other government benefits?  According to a 2020 study by the Foundation for Government Accountability, low-wage Alaska workers earn an average of 11 percent more while unemployed than while gainfully employed.  

But there’s more. Unemployed Alaskans can receive unemployment compensation ranging between a low of $56 per week to a high of $370 per week. If non-cash welfare programs – such as Medicaid, food stamps, and housing vouchers – are included, a non-working single parent with two children could earn just north of $5,700 per month, or nearly $33 per hour. Each dependent, you see, provides an unemployed parent with an extra $75 per week; so someone with has two children and is collecting unemployment receives $150 per week on top of unemployment compensation they are already receiving.   

Back to my son. One of his close acquaintances works for Franz Bakery in Anchorage. A couple weeks ago she mentioned that the company was having difficulty filling entry-level positions so I figured I would talk to her boss.  Larry Brandt is the general manager at Franz Bakery, and he reported that his company was gearing up for their annual increase in business. Warm weather, it turns out, causes people to head toward dormant barbecue grills to cook hot dogs and hamburgers at a prodigious rate, so the bakery heats up production of buns when the ice melts.  

Roughly a month ago, Franz published openings for entry-level jobs. Response was dismal.  After a couple weeks, Brandt made the pay and benefits package more prominent a feature in his help wanted notices:  $20 per hour plus medical, dental, and vision coverage. 

The response this time was noticeably different.  People applied for the positions and the bakery is now at full staffing, a fact that allows Brandt to say his operation has been fortunate. Asked if any of his employees actually quit to take advantage of unemployment benefits, Brandt said he is aware of only one such incident within his company.  An employee opted out rather early in the pandemic, making it clear that he could be well compensated without working eight hours a day in a hot bakery. 

As a local business leader, Brandt talks with other people who run other businesses with 100 to 200 employees on payroll.  Many of those other business managers, he confides, are not so fortunate, especially those who manage large stores owned by big corporations.  They are understaffed and struggling to find workers to fill vacancies.  Some of them have turned to offering signing bonuses for cashiers and stockers.  

So, what does it take for some of those other unemployed people to join the workforce?  Let’s turn to an employment recruiter.  

Billy Hughes is an Alaskan who recruits employees for a large real estate firm, is a licensed realtor himself, and has his own staffing and consulting company. Suffice to say, Hughes is not afraid to work; in fact, he likes it so much he helps find jobs for other people, including real estate agents, property managers, landscapers, marketers, and general laborers.  

He has interviewed 150 people since the start of this year, and only 24 of those interviews resulted in people accepting and actually starting new jobs. Keep in mind, please, that these are people who were pre-screened to meet certain job requirements, and for whom behavioral assessments were conducted.  In other words, these are people who applied for jobs, were qualified for jobs, and were offered jobs.  Yet, just under one-sixth of them ended up accepting job offers. Fully 126 of them either did not return calls, did not follow up after an offer was made, accepted a job and then failed to show for work, or simply turned down the position.  

Asked if any of those applicants who turned down the positions actually expressed that their reason for doing so was because they were making enough from unemployment wages, Hughes said approximately five of them fell into that category.  Most others simply did not return calls or give reasons for not accepting the offers, so their motives are left to speculation.

Hughes works with employers who need unskilled laborers to dig post holes, deliver flyers, and hang signs.  One of these employers was paying $12 to $13 per hour for such work last year but is now having to offer $20 to $30 because he cannot get enough applicants to work for the previous wages.  

Hughes, a 10-year veteran and Army Airborne Ranger who admits to holding a conservative philosophy, said that people just have to “do the math” to realize the issue at hand.  Jobs are available, especially at the entry-level, but people are just not taking them.  

Yet somehow these people have money, and that money is coming from somewhere. That somewhere is unemployment compensation and other government benefits. On the other hand, people who want to work are able to make good wages and put in plenty of hours.  (See previous paragraph regarding $20 to $30 an hour to dig post holes.)  

But it’s not just post-hole digging and sign-hanging jobs that are not getting filled. Medical practitioners are also having difficulties finding people to fill vacancies. Wade Erickson, M.D., is the founder of Capstone Clinic, a prominent medical business headquartered in Wasilla, and one that has been at the forefront of COVID-19 testing.  Capstone is a successful business with clinics or employees located throughout much of the state, including Anchorage, Eagle River, Fairbanks, Juneau, and Ketchikan. The company is currently running radio spots all over Alaska, advertising jobs for swabbers and screeners who stand to make $15 to $20 per hour. This is the first time Dr. Erickson has resorted to radio advertising to fill vacancies. The reason? Not enough applicants. Much like Franz Bakery, Capstone’s openings are usually filled with ease, often by word of mouth by employees or others within their respective industries.  But Capstone needs people right away and they’re not getting them.  

Capstone has been hiring consistently for the past year due to its COVID-19 testing work, and it has been a struggle for most of that year.  Dr. Erickson is of the opinion that it’s the increased unemployment benefits that are keeping applicants at bay.  His company pays well and goes to great lengths to keep its employees safe. Some of the positions involve data entry – sitting at a computer and not interacting with the public, and even those positions are not attracting applicants.  

Another Southcentral-based health business, this one a successful dental practice, is having difficulties hiring dental assistants, positions that require minimal experience but pay twenty-plus dollars per hour.  They are also struggling to hire dental hygienists, occupations that pay well over $50 per hour.  The dental proprietors said they are not the only such business with this problem.  They communicate regularly with their tooth-fixing colleagues, and all of them express the same concern:  they can’t get enough people to fill their job openings. 

Are all these anecdotes proof that high unemployment insurance payments are causing people to stay home instead of looking for work?  Perhaps not, but one has to be in grave stage of denial to think they don’t mean anything.  Plenty of pre-COVID studies show that collecting unemployment insurance reduces the intensity put forward in looking for a job.   

The Foundation for Government Accountability cites the following studies:  Eardley (2019), Canon and Liu (2014), Moffit (2014), Filges et al (2013), Farber and Valetta (2013), Schmeider et al (2012), Krueger and Mueller (2008), and Lalive et al (2004). This volume of research pretty solidly substantiates the idea that people are content to collect government subsidies than put themselves out there to find work.

So, is this the type of information needed to convince folks that enough is enough when it comes to compensating people for not working?  Twenty-three states think it is. 

Last month, Governor Dunleavy joined the several other governors who were putting an end to the $300 weekly bonus provided by the federal government. That federal bonus added $300 onto what individual Alaskans were already receiving in unemployment compensation.  If an Alaskan was getting the top tier weekly compensation of $370, the federal government bonus made it $670 per week. 

If we do the math, as Billy Hughes suggested, we find that $670 per week comes to just under $17 per hour, which is higher than the $15 minimum wage being touted by so many as necessary for a living wage.   

Perhaps this proliferation of unemployment compensation has replaced the need for a minimum wage, or perhaps this is one of those opportunities to not let a good crisis go to waste.  It all seems eerily like a guaranteed basic income; government subsidies replacing the traditional work ethic.  

A couple states are fighting against this largess of government subsidies, going so far as to actually reward people for going back to work. 

The state of Montana is offering $1,200 to unemployment recipients who accept a job and stay on that job for four weeks.  

Arizona is offering $2,000 for individuals who start a full-time job, and $1,000 to those accepting part-time work.  The Grand Canyon State is also instituting community college scholarships for unemployed workers, and even three months of childcare assistance for parents returning to the workforce.  

So now we’ve reached the point where state governments are paying people to go back to work. It’s not exactly fiscal conservatism but it’s better than paying them not to work.  

Tim Barto is employed full-time as vice president with the Alaska Policy Forum.

Way-back machine: What voters advised lawmakers in 1999 when asked about using Permanent Fund for state budget

In 1999, an advisory question was placed on the fall statewide ballot, asking voters if they wanted to use a portion of the Alaska Permanent Fund to pay for state government. The answer from voters was an overwhelming “No.”

At that time, the price of oil had dropped precipitously, getting as low as $9 a barrel, and lawmakers were struggling to balance the state budget, as they are today, with oil at over $70 a barrel.

Alaska voters went overwhelmingly against the proposal, and advised the government that they did not want the fund to be used to patch the hole in the state budget.

For review, the entire advisory question that voters voted down:

Preamble: The people of Alaska created the Alaska Permanent Fund to save a portion of Alaska’s petroleum revenue for the future. After investing those savings, the original intent and purpose was to use the earnings from those investments when Alaska’s petroleum revenues declined. Petroleum revenues have now declined substantially and are forecast to continue to decline. Our reliance upon declining oil production and volatile oil prices constitutes an unsustainable state budget system. The governor and state legislature seek the public’s judgment regarding a stable and sustainable long-term balanced budget plan.

Balanced Budget Plan: This will preserve the permanent fund dividend, inflation-proof the permanent fund, support public services, and establish a Citizens’ Balanced Budget Task Force. 

The Balanced Budget Plan will:

1. Spending Reductions: Continue state general fund budget reductions and commit to long-term budget discipline and efficiencies.

2. Permanent Fund Protection: Guarantee the Alaska permanent fund principal remains untouched. Inflation-proof the permanent fund to protect its value for all Alaskans, including future generations.

3. Permanent Fund Dividends: Guarantee a dividend to eligible Alaskan residents at a minimum of $1,700 in 1999 and $1,700 in 2000. Thereafter, the dividend will be approximately $1,340 and will continue to grow with the value of the permanent fund. After accounting for inflation-proofing, the dividend will be based on 50 percent of the annual earnings payment.

4. Funding for Essential Public Services: After payment of permanent fund dividends and inflation-proofing the fund, prioritize the annual investment earnings payment for essential public services.

5. Accountability: Fully disclose expenditures from the permanent fund earnings with each annual permanent fund dividend.

6. Balanced Budget Task Force: Establish a Citizens’ Balanced Budget Task Force to present options to further reduce state spending and identify appropriate future revenue sources.

7. Income Tax: No personal income tax is enacted as part of this plan.

Question: After paying annual dividends to residents and inflation-proofing the permanent fund, should a portion of permanent fund investment earnings be used to help balance the state budget?

Voters answered:

No 153,996, 83.25%

Yes – 30,994, -16.75%.

Were you in Alaska for the vote in 1999? What are your thoughts now? Write them in the comment section.

New Democrat poll shows Republican Kelly Tshibaka beating Murkowski and Gross in ranked-choice voting scenario

A poll by the left-leaning Change Research group pits Sen. Lisa Murkowski against two other candidates — Republican candidate Kelly Tshibaka and former senatorial Democrat-backed candidate Al Gross. Tshibaka wins, hands down.

In the ranked-choice election method to be used in Alaska for the first time in 2022, Murkowski and Gross split the liberal vote in this poll. John Wayne Howe, who the pollster uses as a placeholder right-leaning candidate of the Alaskan Independence Party, trails in this poll.

In the poll, Tshibaka was ranked #1 by 39 percent of respondents, with Al Gross ranked first by 25 percent, and Murkowski ranked first by 19 percent.

When the second choice votes are recalculated and reassigned, as they will be in Alaska’s ranked-choice process, Tshibaka wins over Gross. Many of the poll participants who had Murkowski as their first choice, picked Gross as their second. The final tally is Tshibaka over Gross 54-46.

Change Research does polling for groups such as the Democratic Attorney Generals Association, NAACP, labor unions such as the AFL-CIO, and the Future Majority group, run by Democratic political strategists. This poll was paid for by the 314 Action Fund, which is trying to get more climate change scientists elected to Congress.

The poll used ranked-choice methodology to ask over 1,023 likely voters in Alaska. from May 22-25. The group used targeted ads on Facebook and Instagram, as well as text messages sent to cell phone numbers of individuals who had a voter file that pollsters were seeking input from. The question was part of a study that included questions about other topics. Ads placed on social media targeted all Alaskan adults. Those who indicated that they were not registered to vote or they were unlikely to vote in 2022 were terminated.

The poll also asked a more general question about Murkowski’s favorability rating, which shows that 84 percent of Republicans view Murkowski unfavorably, and 6 percent of Republicans viewing her favorably; 48 percent of Democrats view her favorably, with just 32 percent viewing her unfavorably.

Results of polling like this will influence whether Democratic individual mega donors or political action committees will bother with the Alaska Senate race in 2022.

In the 2020 election cycle, the Democrats backed Al Gross against Sen. Dan Sullivan, out-raising him by millions of dollars, mostly from out of state. Gross and his independent expenditure groups had in excess of $38 million, while Sullivan and his support groups had $19 million.

Data from OpenSecrets.org

Despite being outspent nearly 2-1, Sullivan won over Gross, 54-41, a better result for Sullivan than when he challenged Sen. Mark Begich in 2014, and beat Begich, 48-46.

Ordinance: Could it lead to arrest of parent if child gets hurt at playground? Do using binoculars pose a form of harassment?

An ordinance considered by the Anchorage Assembly to update the definition of “abuse of a child or vulnerable adult” lowers the threshold for prosecution of some child abuse crimes, and also makes harassment something broadly defined and easier to prosecute.

Whereas now, an adult could be prosecuted for intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly allowing a child to become injured or tortured, the new language says the threshold refers simply to “recklessly,” which supposedly includes the higher levels of “intention” and “knowing,” but allows a jury to focus on just one thing: Did the parent act recklessly?

The desire for the ordinance change came as a result of an egregious case where a mother had subjected her son to cruel punishment, and videotaped it so she could be on the Dr. Phil Show for a segment pertaining to angry moms.

“Beagley was prosecuted for this offense after the ‘Dr. Phil’ television show aired a video that Beagley submitted to the show. In this video, Beagley is seen punishing her seven-year- old son in two ways. First, Beagley made her son drink hot sauce and hold the sauce in his mouth while Beagley yelled at him. Following this, Beagley ordered her son to take off all of his clothes; she then forced him to stand under a cold shower,” the summary of the case revealed.

Read: Jessica Beagley vs. Municipality of Anchorage

Municipal Attorney Kate Vogel wrote that it’s doubtful that her office would prosecute a parent for an injury that occurred on the playground, even if it could be argued that the parent exposed the child recklessly to harm.

“This change makes the language of the ordinance cleaner. It also focuses a jury’s deliberation on whether a defendant has met the ‘reckless’ standard which would result in conviction,” she wrote.

“Experience with jury trials tells us that additional higher levels of intent in code can distract the jury from the lower intent standard upon which they must focus. If a jury is focused on the fact that an act was not intentional, they are more likely to minimize the lower requisite level of intent of recklessness when determining guilt,” Vogel wrote.

“An example would be a parent failing to properly supervise a child playing on a playground who then falls and hurts themselves. This would be negligently permitting injury, yet it would likely not be charged by our office,” the city attorney wrote.

But “likely not be charged” is a pretty big legal loophole for some citizens, who critiqued the change.

Louis Imbriani, a member of the public speaking to the Assembly against the ordinance, said that the change doesn’t clear up the matter, if, as the municipality says, a child injury on a playground can still be seen as a result of a reckless parent not properly supervising the child.

“Looking at this at face value, it is not very clear,” he said. For someone like Imbriani, who works with youth hockey as an official and could be a “mandatory reporter” of potential abuse, “I feel that this could muddy the water and prevent people from reporting crimes in the future.”

Jennifer Anderson, an Anchorage parent, also raised concerns: “I will not raise my daughter wrapped in bubble wrap. The intent as laid out in the memo is to lower the difficulty for the prosecutors. I think we are innocent until we are proven guilty. When we remove the words ‘intent,’ when we remove the words ‘knowingly,’ you have just turned me into a criminal if I allow my daughter to walk down to the park on her own, as an exercise in judgment, growth, and development, so that she can become a responsible human by having an opportunity to make mistakes. I’m not being negligent.”

Anderson also objected to the new definition, “reckless disregard for any annoying effect.” She then took out a pair of binoculars and looked through them at the Assembly for a moment.

“There are some people who would be annoyed by those,” she said, referring apparently to Municipal Clerk Barbara Jones, who had objected to election observers bringing binoculars into the ballot counting area during the recent election. “Have I just committed a crime? Perhaps I have, according to this.”

The ordinance updates harassment by changing the level of intent from “intent to harass or annoy” to “reckless disregard for any harassing or annoying effect.” It shifts the focus to the feelings of the victim of the harassment, but leaves a wide loophole for someone to say he was harassed for anything he finds offensive.

Dr. Michael Savitt, a pediatrician, who has testified in child abuse cases as an expert witness, said he has seen every kind of abuse there is.

“I have seen things you don’t want to see in your worst nightmares. I have seen every kind of abuse that there is: physical, sexual, emotional, and neglect,” he said.

“As I read this ordinance, I find it absolutely unnecessary. The laws are on the books to punish those who need to be punished. The prosecutors are more than able to make a case based on the examination of the child and interrogation of those involved,” Savitt said.

“We take this very seriously. What I find more than anything else here is there is going to be a government intervention between parent and child. I will tell you there are children who will say ‘You won’t let me go do this, well I am going to report you.’ This has happened. I’ve seen this happen already,” he said, also describing cases where neighbors wrongfully report on parents as a way to get even with them for something.

Assemblywoman Meg Zaletel said that people were reading the ordinance wrong and were stretching in their arguments about how the ordinance would be applied.

Assemblyman Kameron Perez-Verdia said the Department of Law had done a “really good job with this.”

Municipal Attorney Kate Vogel said the public testimony was full of “misinformation.”

Later in the evening, Dr. Savitt pushed back on what Vogel called “misinformation.”

“That is telling you that everyone who spoke here is a liar,” Savitt. said. “I for one am tired of being insulted because we disagree.”

The ordinance was postponed until June 22.

LGBTQ advocate tells Assembly that use of term ‘biological man’ is ‘transphobic’

If you want to know more about transgenderism, go to the Midtown Clinic and speak with medical professionals, Mercedes Curran said to the Anchorage Assembly on Tuesday night, targeting at least one Assemblywoman and members of the public who used the term “biological man or woman” during a recent Assembly meeting.

Curran, lecturing the Assembly and public in an angry tone, said the term “biological man or woman” is damaging. She is a member of the LGBTQ+ community.

“Determining gender purely by the basis of biological sex is not as clearcut as one could think. The chromosomes, testosterone levels, the anatomical features arguments don’t hold weight, not with all the research that is out there that shows otherwise,” she said. “Go get current, get educated. Maybe talk to the members of the trans and queer community and listen.”

“There is no excuse to continue to spread harmful information and hateful ideology,” she said. She said there is no reason any woman, trans or otherwise, should be turned away from a shelter and that trans women were a protected class and that to turn away biological males is unAmerican, unAlaskan, and unconstitutional.

She was responding to the debate about whether transgendered men-to-women can be prevented from entering shelters for women. The Hope Center in Downtown Anchorage only admits biological women, and has said these women clients are highly traumatized by men and should not be forced to sleep next to men.

In May, the Anchorage Assembly, on a vote of 8-2, passed an ordinance that revised Anchorage Municipal Code Title 5, the Equal Rights section, to prohibit women’s shelters from barring men who say they are women.

Read: Targeting Hope Center, Assembly passes measure to force women’s shelters to accept biological males

At the same time, the Assembly is funding a shelter for transgender people called “Choosing Our Roots” using federal Covid relief funds.

“Any rhetoric protecting real women is just bigoted dog-whistling that intends to fear-monger and dehumanize one of the most vulnerable populations in our community. Trans women are real women, whether you like it or not, no matter what you say in your echo chamber.”

It was yet another contribution in an ongoing national conversation about who may use women’s bathrooms, women’s locker rooms and whether boys can “identify” as girls and compete against girls in sports.

“Get used to it,” Curran said during her three minutes at the podium. The Assembly had no questions for her.