Friday, September 19, 2025
Home Blog Page 7

Suzanne Downing: Arabella still pulls the strings as left-wing money machine controlling Alaska

10

By SUZANNE DOWNING

It should come as no surprise that Outside nonprofit groups have an oversized interest in controlling Alaska. With our vast oil reserves, strategic Arctic location, and undeniable influence on national resource policy, Alaska is prime real estate for those who want to push a political agenda. What is surprising, however, is just how tangled and well-financed these efforts have become.

An important new report from Defending Education reveals that the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and the National Education Association (NEA) have funneled more than $40 million into progressive causes. Read about it at this Must Read Alaska report:

But that is just one corner of a much larger web. A sprawling network of “dark money” outfits are tied to Arabella Advisors, groups that include the Sixteen Thirty Fund, the New Venture Fund, the Hopewell Fund, the Telescope Fund, the Windward Fund, the Impetus Fund, and the North Fund. These nonprofits are not required to disclose their donors, yet they wield enormous power.

In 2022 alone, Arabella’s empire raised more than $1.3 billion, with money from megadonors like George Soros, Hansjörg Wyss, and Warren Buffett. The Sixteen Thirty Fund alone spent $141 million during the 2018 midterms to influence the Supreme Court, launch “grassroots” campaigns against Republicans, and bankroll ballot measures across the country. Arabella has become such a political juggernaut that even the Gates Foundation has recently distanced itself, even after having donated $450 million to Arabella-administered nonprofit funds over the past 16 years.

Alaska has become a proving ground for nonprofit activist groups. The Sixteen Thirty Fund poured $35,000 into “Building a Stronger Anchorage,” a failed bid to elect Forrest Dunbar as mayor.

In 2022, it teamed up with the NEA to spend $1.4 million opposing a constitutional convention—more than doubling the opposition’s war chest. The following year, it bankrolled over $800,000 for the “Better Jobs for Alaska” initiative to raise the minimum wage, plus $65,000 to the Alaska AFL-CIO.

This pattern isn’t just a coincidence. Arabella’s web of nonprofits has a clear goal: to reshape Alaska’s politics and economy in ways that align with the national left. They have systematically funded anti-development initiatives—chief among them the 2018 “Stand for Salmon” ballot measure, designed to tie up oil, gas, and infrastructure projects in new red tape. The New Venture Fund contributed more than $263,000 in in-kind support to that campaign.

The New Venture Fund itself is a financial powerhouse, reporting $669 million in revenue and $895 million in spending in 2023, with nearly $593 million handed out in grants. Much of that money fuels Alaska’s environmental and political movements.

For example, the New Venture Fund bankrolled early efforts to change Alaska’s voting system—pouring more than half a million dollars into automatic voter registration, without proof of citizenship required. It also channels millions each year into local-sounding fronts like SalmonState and the Alaska Venture Fund.

SalmonState alone takes in about $2 million annually, supported by heavy-hitter foundations like Gordon and Betty Moore, Hewlett, Wilburforce, and the Wild Salmon Center. The Alaska Venture Fund was seeded in 2021 with $10 million from Jeff Bezos’ Earth Fund.

Not one of these funders is based in Alaska. They are Outside billionaires and foundations with left-wing priorities—abortion expansion, anti-fossil fuel activism, and election reforms that benefit Democrats. By laundering their money through local-branded groups, they make it appear as though these are grassroots Alaskan efforts. They are not.

The strategy is clear: Arabella’s New Venture Fund and its affiliates bankroll environmental lawsuits, anti-oil and gas campaigns, and election rule changes. Each one of these “investments” chips away at Alaska’s economic future while cementing a progressive political infrastructure.

The revelations about teachers’ unions pouring dues into these networks are only the latest reminder. Alaskans should be asking hard questions—not just about who is funding these campaigns, but about what the endgame is. At stake is nothing less than Alaska’s sovereignty over its resources, its economy, and its future.

Outside billionaires should not be allowed to dictate what happens in Alaska. And yet, they’ve been doing so unchecked for decades.

Suzanne Downing is founder and editor of Must Read Alaska.

Rick Whitbeck: More Arabella dark money slithers into Alaska with ‘New Energy Alaska’

Video shocker: Sen. Jesse Kiehl aligns with George Soros, Arabella Advisors, New Venture Fund in trying to take down Alaska’s economy

Randy Ruaro: Exposing the shadowy grip of Arabella Advisors, New Venture Fund in Alaska

Top down control: Arabella Advisors runs New Venture Fund, which controls liberal groups in Alaska

Congressional ‘watchdog’ or partisan hit job? Dark money 907 Initiative is at it again

Trump targets unethical law firms, including one that notoriously shapes Alaska political outcomes

Biden to award Medal of Freedom to George Soros, Hillary Clinton, David Rubenstein

Listicle: Follow the money at the ‘No on 2’ campaign, which has $12.3 million — most tracing back to the John and Laura Arnold

Alaska Permanent Fund hits record $85 billion, even as Alaskans see smaller dividends

92

The Alaska Permanent Fund has reached a historic milestone, surpassing $85 billion for the first time in its more than 45-year history, a remarkable achievement that highlights the state’s unique approach to managing its oil wealth.

Established in 1976 by a voter-approved constitutional amendment, the Alaska Permanent Fund was designed to convert a portion of the state’s oil royalties into a permanent endowment, with earnings distributed annually to residents as dividends. Over the decades, the fund has grown steadily, benefiting from investment returns and ongoing contributions from oil revenues. Today, the fund underpins a larger share of Alaska’s government budget than oil royalties themselves, making it a central pillar of the state’s fiscal health.

When Gov. Mike Dunleavy took office, the fund stood at roughly $60 billion. Since then, it has grown to more than $85 billion, which generates an additional billion dollars annually that could fuel Alaska’s economy. Unfortunately, much of that new wealth does not flow directly to Alaskans through their Permanent Fund dividends. Instead, legislative changes over recent years have siphoned billions from Alaskans’ dividends to government spending, even as the governor has sought to moderate overall state spending increases.

Still, $85 billion is a major milestone for Alaskans for a fund that has weathered volatile oil prices, economic downturns, market swings, and pressure to invade the corpus, to become one of the largest state sovereign wealth funds in the world.

Since the Legislature passed the Percent of Market Value formula in 2018, the state has only been allowed to spend a set percentage of the fund’s value annually. While the POMV formula was designed to provide predictable, sustainable payouts, it also means that much of the fund’s earnings, held in the earnings reserve account, remain off-limits for government spending.

The fund’s current growth comes amid renewed debate over its structure. Some Democrat and even Republican lawmakers have floated proposals to consolidate the earnings reserve account with the fund’s principal, a move that others warn could be a first step toward draining the corpus itself to pay for ongoing government operations. Such a change would mark a sharp departure from the fund’s original intent: To preserve Alaska’s oil wealth for future generations.

The Permanent Fund dividend, this year set by the Legislature at $1,000 per eligible Alaskan, will hit bank accounts around Oct. 2 for direct deposit, and Oct. 23 for paper checks.

Robb Myers: Why we should not combine Alaska Permanent Fund accounts

Win Gruening: Juneau taxpayers pay the price for no-growth mindset

By WIN GRUENING

Municipal election ballots will begin arriving in Juneau mailboxes this month and voters will have to make choices. Will they continue to allow a good portion of their tax dollars to be spent without regard for the wishes of the public? Are they going to tolerate ever rising taxes and fees to make Juneau an even more unaffordable place to live?

There is a better way. Outmigration and the continuing decline in school enrollment will only be stemmed by economic growth and a corresponding drop in Juneau’s cost of living.

Economic growth, measured by an increase in income, employment, and a broader and thus healthier tax base, would help make Juneau more affordable. 

But the City and Borough of Juneau Assembly, after funding community core needs like public safety, basic infrastructure, and schools, always seems to pivot to discretionary spending on projects and initiatives that few want or need. 

If raising taxes, adding debt, and increasing rates for city services are the only solutions the CBJ Assembly is willing to consider, community affordability will continue to suffer. It follows that seniors on fixed incomes and working-class families will leave for less expensive places to live.

Reversing this trend requires a focus on balanced economic growth coupled with restrained spending. 

The Assembly’s enthusiasm for spending millions of dollars for new city offices, a new arts and culture “civic” center, and unnecessary voting schemes like vote-by-mail and ranked-choice-voting is the most visible evidence of their lack of regard for taxpayers’ real needs.

Hidden in the city budget is also an ever-growing list of discretionary city grants that have little relation to core government services. The annual cost of these services has tripled in size and amounts to over $91 million in the past 12 years.

Pumping more government money (your taxes) into the economy isn’t the answer. This rarely creates durable jobs and is subject to the whims of government bureaucrats and elected officials.

Creating permanent jobs and expanding Juneau’s tax base are the province of the private sector. Government’s role in fostering economic growth is to keep taxes low, cut bureaucracy, and generally make it easier to design and develop revenue-producing projects.

But it isn’t clear that Junueau’s city leaders understand this.

One only needs to look to the Aak’w Landing project, a proposed new cruise ship terminal and uplands development in the Subport area, that has undergone the most rigorous and demanding public process in recent CBJ history. 

The $200-million project languished for years, dating back to when the property was purchased in 2019. It faced a never-ending array of bureaucratic challenges and delays to reach a point where the Juneau Assembly finally decided on a necessary tidelands permit last March. Yet, the owner, Huna Totem Corporation, is still waiting for the tidelands lease to be finalized so it can begin construction.

Other projects that could bolster Juneau’s economy could be in the offing if the city would promote less restrictive and burdensome requirements for developers. Streamlined permitting, creative zoning, deleting unnecessary parking requirements, for instance, are all ways to encourage and support entrepreneurial development.

What is clear is that based on the deluge of comments on social media, recent spending decisions by the city have struck a nerve with Juneau taxpayers. 

This has resulted in two citizen initiatives being placed on the ballot to limit the property tax millage rate to 9 mills (slightly above where is was last year) and to exempt food and utilities from sales taxes.

The city has responded by placing a seasonal sales tax proposal on the ballot that is being presented as a way to offset revenue reductions. In reality, however, a seasonal sales tax likely would increase the tax burden for many residents, especially seniors.

Voters’ only recourse is to pass the two ballot propositions limiting property tax increases, adding a sales tax exemption for food and utilities, and voting against the seasonal sales tax proposal.

By doing so, voters will send a clear message to city hall that “We want this city to be responsive to voters, and we want it to grow, because it’s the only way it will be affordable to live here.” 

After retiring as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in Alaska, Win Gruening became a regular opinion page columnist for the Juneau Empire. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is involved in various local and statewide organizations.

Win Gruening: Juneau seasonal sales tax proposal is a permanent tax increase

Win Gruening: Sullivan’s actions speak louder than his critics

Win Gruening: Nick Begich III is hitting it out of the ballpark in Congress

Win Gruening: Juneau leaders lose the plot on affordability, but voters may push back in October

Win Gruening: Homeless, not helpless, Part 2

Win Gruening: Juneau Assembly set to mandate another complicated, cumbersome voting system

Anchorage celebrates gold anniversary, as state of decay is on full display: MRAK photo gallery

17

The Municipality of Anchorage is celebrating its 50th anniversary this month, with a schedule of events intended to highlight community spirit and civic pride.

Anchorage mayor pushes ‘Beyond the Beige’ public art grants, while vagrancy, decay take over the city

While Anchorage’s roots stretch back more than a century, the incorporation of the municipality came in 1975, combining the city and borough into a unified government. To mark the milestone, city officials plan events beginning Friday with a “night market” at Town Square Park from 5 to 8:30 pm. The celebration continues through November with music, art, and community parties.

Photo Gallery: Anchorage at summer’s end, a city overrun by vagrant camps

But for many residents, the timing of the festivities underscores a sharp irony. Anchorage in 2025 is not the Anchorage of 1975. Today, the city’s streets and parks bear the visible signs of social decay — homeless encampments scattered across downtown, drug use in full view, and petty thefts that have become routine in local businesses. Visitors to Town Square Park, where Friday’s event will be staged, have long complained about disorder and safety concerns in the very heart of the city.

Monday dawn stroll through vagrant-overtaken Peratrovich Park in downtown Anchorage

The contrast is stark: A city celebrating its golden anniversary while grappling with a vagrant crisis that leaves sidewalks littered and smeared with human excrement, storefronts shuttered, and entryways overtaken by vagrancy.

As part of our ongoing series documenting the decline of Anchorage, Must Read Alaska has another set of photos of the “real Anchorage in 2025” — images that stand in sharp relief against the official anniversary banners and speeches.

Glamping in the greenbelts: Anchorage’s luxury lawlessness, with free tents for vagrants

As the Municipality presses forward with its planned commemorations, the deeper question for Anchorage’s future remains whether the next 50 years will reflect renewal or further decline.

Video: Drone footage reveals sprawling vagrant occupation expanding in S. Anchorage greenbelt

Photos from the past 48 hours in Anchorage:

Human excrement below the flower baskets downtown, and footprints showing people have walked into the waste.

More coverage from earlier this summer:

Anchorage workers removed 744,000 pounds of vagrant encampment debris from Davis Park — the weight of a fully loaded Boeing 747-400

Video: As Anchorage begins to abate vagrant encampments, the squatters set protest fires

New Anchorage law targets illegal fires amid rising wildfire risk and vagrant camp sprawl

Another day, another vagrant camp fire in Anchorage

Anchorage Assembly’s Tuesday agenda has millions to deal with vagrancy and homelessness

Man arrested for sexual assault within yards of Anchorage City Hall — in broad daylight

Anchorage mayor fails to order downtown cleanup ahead of Trump visit

As snipers scout rooftops, Anchorage’s streets remain littered with bodies before diplomats arrive

Another work day in Anchorage: Arson edition

Photo tour: Step carefully in urban Anchorage

As lawlessness abounds, Anchorage Assembly hosts workshop to ‘reimagine’ public safety

Linda Boyle: Big Pharma moves to crush RFK Jr., as Trump calls out Pfizer’s role in Operation Warp Speed

By LINDA BOYLE

The clash between Big Pharma, a fractured CDC, and the mainstream media has reached a boiling point — and President Donald Trump has had enough. In a blunt Truth Social post this week, he questioned the success of Operation Warp Speed, demanded Pfizer “show the data,” and signaled that Americans deserve answers about the mRNA vaccines now, not later.

In his post, Trump laid out several striking points:

  • He admitted that not everyone sees the Covid jab as a miracle cure.
  • He pointed to the raging battle over mRNA shots — a fight so intense it is splitting the CDC — and said it must be resolved.
  • He stressed that the fallout isn’t on him, since his decisions relied on data provided by Pfizer.
  • He demanded the company “show us the data” and prove the vaccines’ success.
  • Most notably, he questioned whether Operation Warp Speed was truly “brilliant” and said if it wasn’t, the American people deserve answers.
  • And those answers, he made clear, are needed now.

I’m continually struck by Trump’s instinct for what’s really happening in the country. He seems to sense the undercurrents long before others do.

And the signs are clear: the Biotechnology Innovation Organization (BIO) has rolled out a tactical plan aimed at propping up its vaccine agenda and undermining — or more likely, destroying — Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. What I didn’t share in my earlier article is that BIO set a specific timeline for this effort.

At its April 3, 2025 meeting, the group mapped out September as the critical month to shape the vaccine narrative and protect Big Pharma’s position. The strategy is multi-pronged, designed to mislead the public, silence dissenting voices, and safeguard the industry’s dominance.

 This is a multi-pronged approach to deceive the public, silence dissent, and preserve industry’s dominance. Here is the link to the plan.

With Congress back in session this month and the federal fiscal year ending on Sept. 30, vaccine policy, public health budgets, and FDA funding are front and center.

For Big Pharma, the stakes couldn’t be higher. If Kennedy’s influence grows, reformers could disrupt the industry’s easy access to federal dollars, slow down regulatory approvals, or even force hearings that expose deep “industry-government entanglements.”

That’s why so much of the effort is aimed at silencing Kennedy’s message — a message grounded in facts, reform principles, and moral clarity. In recent weeks, mainstream outlets have doubled down on labeling him an “anti-vaxxer,” warning that any changes to the vaccine schedule would cost lives.

At the core of BIO’s Vaccine Policy Steering Committee strategy is one issue: mRNA shots. They represent a massive profit stream for pharmaceutical companies and their investors, and recent CDC policy shifts have already taken a toll on their bottom line.

In response, BIO and its allies have escalated their campaign. Eastern states are banding together to craft their own vaccine guidance rather than following the CDC, while governors in Washington, Oregon, and California are pushing a similar agenda.

The elephant in the room remains the mRNA Covid shot. The coastal state governors point to rising case counts — not deaths — as justification for drafting their own vaccine policies. Their plan is to align with groups like the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, all of which continue to back widespread Covid vaccination. Translation: follow the money.

HHS spokesman Andrew Nixon fired back, blasting “Democrat-run states” for the lockdowns, mask mandates, and vaccine passports of the Covid era—policies he said eroded public trust in health agencies. He emphasized that the administration’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices remains the nation’s scientific authority on vaccines, pledging that HHS will base policy on “rigorous evidence and Gold Standard Science, not the failed politics of the pandemic.”

Alaska currently plans to follow the CDC’s recommendations.

Another active anti-Kennedy group is “Save HHS.” More than 1,000 current and former HHS employees signed a letter to congress and Kennedy insisting Kennedy resign, after CDC Director Susan Monarez was removed. The letter to Congress says that Kennedy’s actions “compromising the health of the nation.” 

The timing of all this is well orchestrated. It’s a major media blitz going on to dramatically affect American opinion in favor of Big Pharma.  Its intent is to destroy Kennedy and get him out of HHS. They want someone in there who is more friendly to Big Pharma’s goals.   

At the Senate Finance Committee,  Kennedy addressed the financial needs of HSS with a focus on underlying causes of chronic disease and how to Make America Healthy Again.  His focus is not on needing more money for vaccines.

Questions came from both Republicans and Democrats concerning vaccines and the CDC’s staff resignation. Once more, follow the money to the pockets of the elected officials.  

There is much at stake: Will we rid ourselves of Big Pharma’s stranglehold on our healthcare?  

Nowhere is there a discussion on what we might need to do to make ourselves healthy again. Instead, we are being taught we are all victims of our life choices that may have led to those chronic diseases.  

Trump has every right to be frustrated.This is a hot mess. Trump demands Big Pharma justify its success or answer for any problems found in the data. He wants answers, and he wants them now.  

Big Pharma has a lot riding on this. But so do the American people. 

Who will win the argument? Big Pharma or Americans?

Come to our Alaskans 4 Personal Freedom event on Oct 11 at the Wendy Williamson Auditorium on the University of Alaska Anchorage campus. You can hear Mary Holland, the CEO of Children’s Health Defense founded by Kennedy, talk about vaccine litigation. 

Linda Boyle, RN, MSN, DM, was formerly the chief nurse for the 3rd Medical Group, JBER, and was the interim director of the Alaska VA. Most recently, she served as Director for Central Alabama VA Healthcare System. She is the director of the Alaska Covid Alliance.

Linda Boyle: Big Pharma plots in secret meeting to oust HHS Sec. Kennedy, as reform threatens profits

Linda Boyle: Medical establishment in revolt against CDC on Covid jab guidance

Linda Boyle: Medical freedom on the line as Alaska medical board decides physician assistant’s fate

Linda Boyle: Dr. Pierre Kory and the War on Ivermectin: A life-saving medicine silenced

Linda Boyle: Pediatric professional group puts profits above patients

Linda Boyle: RFK Jr. in Alaska talks tribal sovereignty, Medicaid rules, and a shift on mRNA vaccines

Linda Boyle: FDA’s Dr. Vinay Prasad, Big Pharma, politics, and the price of medical integrity

Linda Boyle: FDA green lights Spikevax for young children, raising questions on safety, transparency

Report: Alaska falls behind on election integrity while other states act to close loopholes

A new report from the Honest Elections Project highlights sweeping election integrity reforms passed in conservative-led states this year—but Alaska was not among them.

According to the report, “Securing the Vote 2025: States Make Major Gains Banning Foreign Funding and Ranked-Choice Voting,” legislatures in 17 states considered bills in 2025 to stop foreign nationals and foreign-funded groups from bankrolling state ballot measure campaigns. Eight states—including Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, and Missouri—ultimately enacted laws to close the loophole that allows foreign money to influence ballot initiatives. Meanwhile, six more states joined a growing list of those banning ranked-choice voting (RCV), a system that critics say confuses voters, delays results, and undermines confidence in elections.

But despite being one of the top targets for outside spending, Alaska lawmakers failed to advance any such protections. The state has already seen more than $5 million in foreign-tied funding, much of it routed through the left-leaning Sixteen Thirty Fund, a dark-money group that watchdogs say has served as a pipeline for foreign-linked contributions. The group, heavily backed by Swiss billionaire Hansjörg Wyss, has poured over $130 million into ballot measure campaigns across 26 states, including efforts in Alaska to shape election laws.

The Honest Elections Project report warns that this loophole allows foreign actors to influence constitutional amendments and ballot initiatives, even though they are banned from donating to candidates or political action committees. That influence has been particularly evident in states like Michigan and Alaska, where major ballot initiatives funded by the Sixteen Thirty Fund reshaped election rules.

Alaska also stands out as one of only two states using ranked-choice voting statewide. In 2020, voters narrowly adopted the system, and in 2024, despite dark money propping it up in the minds of voters, they came within just 700 votes of repealing the process that disenfranchises voters through ballot exhaustion and creates unusual outcomes in which the candidate with the most first-choice votes can still lose. The report notes that since 2022, 17 states have banned RCV, while Utah is set to end its municipal pilot program this year.

The Alaska Legislature has not acted to ban ranked-choice voting on the municipal level, and Juneau and Anchorage are in the early stages of adopting it for local elections, despite the fact that local races rarely have more than two people running for any given seat

Across the country, Republican-controlled legislatures passed more election-related laws in 2025 than in the prior year—405 compared to 224 in 2024. Most focused on expediting results, preventing noncitizen voting, and closing loopholes that allow foreign interference in ballot campaigns.

Yet Alaska’s Legislature has yet to act. That inaction leaves the state exposed both to dark money from groups like the Sixteen Thirty Fund and to a voting system increasingly rejected by states across the country.

With another repeal effort underway by the group Repeal Now, the fight over ranked-choice voting in Alaska is far from over. But without legislative action, the state remains vulnerable to the same outside influence that lawmakers elsewhere are moving swiftly to shut down.

Kevin McCabe: Ranked-choice voting cheats voters, but Alaskans are fighting back

Paulette Simpson: Rising waters, rising costs, and a Juneau Assembly obsessed with ranked-choice voting

Murray Walsh: Why Alaska voters deserve better than ranked-choice voting

Bob Bird: Alaska’s GOP must drop the dead weight — or ranked-choice voting and Democrats win

Time to say goodbye to ranked-choice voting

Breaking: Court deals final blow to Kendall lawsuit over ranked-choice voting repeal petition

Constant abruptly withdraws ranked-choice voting proposal from Anchorage Assembly hearing agenda

Muslim Socialist is positioning to take over as mayor of NYC, thanks to ranked-choice voting

Ranked-choice voting on the table, with Anchorage Assembly planning election overhaul

Ranked-choice voting on the table in Juneau: Reform or risk?

Harry Roth: Oakland is a case study in the failures of ranked-choice voting

House votes with Begich to overturn BLM land plan, reviving path for Ambler mining road

The US House of Representatives on Wednesday passed House Joint Resolution 106, legislation introduced by Congressman Nick Begich to overturn the Bureau of Land Management’s Central Yukon Resource Management Plan.

The vote makes way for a 211-mile industrial-use road that would allow the development of the Ambler Mining District, a state mining district that is unreachable without access across federal land. The access to the mining district was guaranteed by law.

The first Trump administration issued a federal permit for the project in 2020, but the Biden Administration axed the permit.

The Central Yukon RMP, finalized by the Biden administration in 2024, governs 56 million acres in north and central Alaska, stretching from the Brooks Range to the Yukon River. The plan set new restrictions on development by designating more than 3.6 million acres as “Areas of Critical Environmental Concern,” limiting leasing opportunities, and continuing longstanding land withdrawals.

The Biden plan put more than 13 million acres effectively off-limits, curtailing the state’s ability to pursue oil, gas, and mineral projects, harming Alaska’s economy and prevent the state from contributing to U.S. energy and mineral independence at a time when demand for critical minerals is rising globally.

“The 2024 Central Yukon plan locks up more than 13 million acres of public land and blocks projects vital to our nation’s energy security and economic future,” said Congressman Begich. “With this resolution, we are restoring balance to federal land policy and ensuring that Alaska can responsibly contribute to America’s energy and mineral independence. Alaskans know how to balance stewardship and development, and I am proud to have championed this legislation in the House that restores responsible management of our state’s resources.”

Begich’s resolution seeks to repeal the Central Yukon plan outright in order to:

  • Reinforce US energy security by opening new areas for oil and gas development.
  • Unlock access to critical minerals used in advanced technologies and defense applications.
  • Support major projects such as the Alaska LNG pipeline, which is expected to create more than 10,000 jobs and deliver 3.5 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day.

The Congressional Review Act requires that before a rule can take effect, an agency must submit the rule to both the House of Representatives and the Senate, as well as the Comptroller General. CRA adopts the definition of “rule” under the Administrative Procedure Act but excludes certain categories of rules from coverage. The Central Yukon RMP meets the APA definition of a “rule,” and is subject to CRA’s submission requirements.

The House vote, 215-210, now places the issue squarely before the U.S. Senate, where lawmakers will now decide whether to reject the Central Yukon plan. The outcome could set an important precedent for how federal land in Alaska is managed in the years ahead, balancing national conservation priorities against the state’s push for resource development.

Take-back time: Biden-Harris suspend Ambler Road permit

Ambler Road hearing: Biden agency puts everyone on a timer, but elders go first, can run out the clock

Alaska quarantines invasive cherry trees to protect ecosystems, salmon

26

The Alaska Division of Agriculture has issued a statewide quarantine on two invasive tree species—Prunus padus, known as the European Bird Cherry or Mayday tree, and Prunus virginiana, commonly called the Canada Red or Chokecherry tree.

Effective Sept. 1, the order prohibits the importation, transport, and sale of both species and their parts. State officials say the trees are rapidly spreading in Alaska’s riparian zones and forests, creating monocultures that displace native vegetation and threaten fish and wildlife habitat.

The trees have established themselves across multiple regions, including the Fairbanks North Star Borough, Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Anchorage, the Kenai Peninsula, and Juneau.

Chokecherry in bloom.

These species have been documented along creeks and streams, where they reduce insect biomass critical to juvenile salmon, said Bryan Scoresby, Director of the Division of Agriculture. “Many agencies continue to pursue control measures with the goal of eliminating these invasive trees. With this quarantine, the flow of trees into Alaska will stop, making this goal more attainable.”

The invasive Prunus species not only compete with native plants but also pose direct risks to Alaska’s wildlife. They contain a cyanogenic glycoside that is toxic to ruminants such as moose when consumed, reducing the availability of safe winter forage.

In addition, researchers recently detected the fungal disease “Black Knot” (Apiosporina morbosa) on European Bird Cherry trees at the University of Alaska Anchorage campus. Black Knot is a serious threat to fruit tree cultivation, especially plums and cherries, and invasive Prunus trees are a potential vector for its spread.

Over the past five years, the Department of Natural Resources’ Division of Forestry & Fire Protection has invested more than $400,000 in control measures across Alaska’s largest boroughs. The agency has also led public outreach campaigns through community meetings, media coverage, and radio ads to warn Alaskans about the risks of invasive Prunus trees. An additional $250,000 has been committed to current projects aimed at eradication.

The Department of Natural Resources said that protecting native ecosystems aligns with its mission to develop, conserve, and maximize the use of Alaska’s natural resources in the public interest.

Alaska Health Department issues Fall vaccine guidance, as FDA updates Covid-19 shot advice

21

The Alaska Department of Health has released its fall vaccine update, aligning with the latest federal guidance as the state prepares for flu, RSV, and Covid-19 season, but adding that some medical professional groups have developed alternate guidance.

Flu Vaccine
Health officials recommend that everyone six months and older receive the 2025–2026 trivalent influenza vaccine, which is now available statewide. This year’s formulation is a single-dose shot designed to protect against the most common strains expected to circulate. The Department has published new epidemiology bulletins outlining vaccine availability and clinical guidance for providers.

COVID-19 Vaccine
On Aug. 27, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved new Covid vaccines for the 2025–2026 season from Moderna, Pfizer, and Sanofi/Novavax. At the same time, the FDA revoked the Emergency Use Authorization for prior versions of Moderna, Pfizer-BioNTech, and Novavax vaccines. These older formulations should no longer be administered.

For children ages six months to 11 years, the revoked EUA vaccines are no longer authorized. For people 12 and older, state health officials emphasize that patients should receive the newly licensed 2025–2026 vaccines rather than last season’s products.

The Alaska Department of Health is directing providers to immediately remove all 2024–2025 Covid vaccines from storage, delete them from inventory systems, and return unused doses to the CDC’s centralized distributor.

RSV Protection
Orders for nirsevimab, a preventive antibody for respiratory syncytial virus in infants, continue to be filled as Alaska prepares for the peak RSV season later this fall.

Next Steps
The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices will meet September 18–19 to finalize recommendations for Covid vaccines. National groups, including the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, have already released their alternate preliminary recommendations, but it’s unclear if the Alaska Department of Health will go along with them. Alaska’s Immunization Program will issue further guidance once ACIP’s decisions are published.

Linda Boyle: Medical establishment in revolt against CDC on Covid jab guidance

Linda Boyle: Big Pharma plots in secret meeting to oust HHS Sec. Kennedy, as reform threatens profits

Linda Boyle: Medical freedom on the line as Alaska medical board decides physician assistant’s fate

Linda Boyle: Pediatric professional group puts profits above patients