Wednesday, October 14, 2026
Home Blog Page 8

BlueCrest secures funding to further develop Cook Inlet gas; first production from new well expected March 2027

1

BlueCrest Energy Inc. announced on September 14, 2026, that it has secured funding to advance development of the Lower Tyonek A natural gas reservoir at the Cosmopolitan Unit in Cook Inlet, Alaska.

The development program includes recertification of BlueCrest Rig #1, final well engineering, procurement of long-lead equipment, expansion of the Hansen Production Facility, and drilling and completion of the H-17 Lower Tyonek A extended-reach gas well.

BlueCrest anticipates first natural gas production from H-17 by March 1, 2027, with an anticipated initial production rate of approximately 25 million cubic feet per day (MMcf/day).

H-17 will be drilled from BlueCrest’s existing onshore Hansen pad beneath Cook Inlet. Following production and evaluation of H-17, BlueCrest plans to use the actual well results to optimize and advance a second Lower Tyonek A extended-reach development well.

“BlueCrest will be part of the solution to the natural gas supply shortfall facing the Cook Inlet region,” said J. Benjamin Johnson, Chief Executive Officer, and John M. Martineck, Chief Operating Officer. “With funding secured, our focus is on execution and bringing additional locally produced natural gas to the Cook Inlet market as quickly and responsibly as possible.”

BlueCrest’s Plan of Development establishes a commitment to achieve first Lower Tyonek A gas no later than March 31, 2027. The Company’s current operating target is to begin production by March 1, 2027.

About BlueCrest

BlueCrest Energy Inc., through BlueCrest Alaska Operating LLC, develops and produces oil and natural gas resources at the Cosmopolitan Unit in Cook Inlet, Alaska.

Press release provided by BlueCrest Energy Inc.

Public invited to comment on Statewide Transportation Improvement Program for 2027-2030

5

The Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities (DOT&PF) today released the Draft 2027-2030 Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) for public review and comment.

Transportation is fundamental to life in Alaska. Highways, bridges, ferries, trails, transit systems, and community access roads connect Alaskans with jobs, schools, medical care, goods, services, and one another while supporting resource development, tourism, commerce, and freight movement.

The STIP is Alaska’s four-year program for federally funded surface transportation investments. The Draft 2027-2030 STIP advances projects throughout the state with a focus on:

  • Improving safety and rehabilitating aging highways and bridges, particularly on National Highway System corridors;
  • Advancing frontier roads that provide access to communities, resources, recreation, and economic opportunities;
  • Strengthening the Alaska Marine Highway System through vessel, terminal, and service investments; and
  • Supporting transit, active transportation, community transportation, and the Recreational Trails Program.

The draft responds to rising construction costs by updating project budgets and protecting work already underway. It also balances major investments with smaller, construction-ready projects that support competition, sustain Alaska’s workforce, and put federal funding to work throughout the state.

“Transportation is essential to Alaska’s people and economy,” said DOT&PF Commissioner Ryan Anderson. “This STIP invests in safer roads, reliable ferries, stronger highway corridors, and community access while responding to rising costs and sustaining a competitive contracting community.”

To review the Draft 2027-2030 STIP and submit comments, visit dot.alaska.gov/links/pdp.

Public Review and Comments

Public input is a critical component of the STIP process, helping ensure that transportation investments reflect community priorities and statewide needs. As a new STIP, the Draft 2027–2030 STIP will be open for public review and comment for 45-days, from September 14 through October 29, 2026. An improved public comment portal builds on prior STIP engagement efforts with a user-friendly experience, making it easier for Alaskans to explore projects and share input. DOT&PF encourages public participation in the review process.

ONLINE: at dot.alaska.gov/links/pdp
EMAIL: [email protected]
VOICEMAIL: 1 (855) 925-2801, use Project Code 10968
TEXT: 1 (855) 925-2801 (Type “STIP” to start your message)
TTY: 711 or 1-800-770-8973 to reach the Alaska Relay
MAIL: STIP Team, Alaska DOT&PF
            550 W. 7th Avenue, Suite 295
            Anchorage, AK 99501

Next Steps

Following the public comment period, Alaska DOT&PF will review all feedback, respond to comments, and incorporate revisions as appropriate before submitting the final 2027–2030 STIP to the Federal Highways Administration and the Federal Transit Administration for federal approval.

Press release provided by the Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities.

Hughes endorses Treg Taylor for Governor (plus rank the other two Republicans)

3

Today, September 15, former gubernatorial candidate and Senate Majority Leader Shelley Hughes announced her endorsement of Treg Taylor for Governor and also encouraged conservative voters to rank all three Republican candidates to avoid exhausted ballots benefiting the Democrat candidate Jonathon Kreiss-Tomkins.

Taylor commented on the endorsement: “Shelley’s vetting was tough and thorough, and I’m honored to have passed the test. I’m proud we see eye-to-eye on values and on concrete policy solutions that will make Alaskans’ lives better and our state stronger. Earning her support matters. She is well loved and respected across Alaska. I know her endorsement will carry weight. Thank you, Shelley.”

Hughes looked for the candidate who best matches her values, who “has not been mudslinging, including through surrogates,” and who is free from baggage and skeletons.

“The first half of my assessment boiled down to who was the most electable,” Hughes said. “With a socialist-leaning liberal in the race, the stakes are high. A far-left governor would be devastating: income taxes, other taxes, suppressed resource development, more wokeism and failure in our schools. I needed to get behind the most electable candidate—the one right-of-center and moderate voters can get across the finish line.”

The second half of her assessment was policy. “I was only going to stick my neck out if a candidate committed to implementing some of the specific proposals and plans my campaign team worked hard to develop to get Alaska on track,” Hughes said. She stressed this was not about her former ticket. It was about Alaska and clear, practical solutions.

“I had encouraged the remaining candidates to take up any of the action steps my team and I proposed,” she continued. “Treg is the only one who did. He not only met the high bar I set on character and electability, but what excites me most is his commitment to the feasible plans we offered—to address decades-old problems, to begin work for future decades, to build an economy of strength and resilience, and to secure freedom and opportunity for Alaskans for generations.”

Taylor added: “The policy proposals Shelley offered make sense. We need the Sunset Audit Commission to drive agency efficiency and cost savings. I am committed to a constitutional framework for grand juries. No more filtering. It will be an open door, a pathway to uphold citizens’ rights. A full energy portfolio. Alaska lands in Alaskan hands. A shift to abundance management for fish and game. A stronger agriculture sector, increased food security. I’m excited—and the time is right—to work with the private sector to connect our rail to the Lower 48 and to the Port of Nome. Positioning Alaska as the intercontinental transportation hub of the Northern Hemisphere will lower the cost of goods in Alaska, open new sites for responsible resource development, and strengthen our transportation system so Alaska exports become a reality.”

Hughes’ former running mate, Blake Gettys, joins her to support Taylor. “Shelley and I are together on this. We’ll both rank the right, but the Taylor/English ticket will be our top choice,” Gettys said. “Trust is paramount. Treg will be a governor I can trust to fight for us and to be effective through strong relationships and common-sense, actionable policy.

Hughes will be ranking Treg Taylor #1 and ranking Bronson and Wilson after Taylor. She did not specify which order she would rank Wilson and Bronson but emphasized the importance of conservative voters ranking all three Republican candidates to avoid exhausted ballots. Exhausted ballots occur when a voter’s first choice is eliminated in one of the rounds and the voter did not choose a second choice. These ballots do not count toward the final tally— reducing the number of conservative votes counted toward the final outcome of the election.

More Conservatives Speak on the Winning Strategy

Greg Sarber, conservative writer and former board member of Alaska Gold Communications, Inc.: Opinion: Conservative Alaskans need to vote strategically for Governor

Jim Minnery, President of Alaska Family Council: Opinion: Alaska Family Council speaks on governor’s race, invites Christians to prayer gathering

Dr. George B. Hightower, former 2026 candidate for Lt. Governor: Opinion: The governor’s race is a fight for freedom; here’s how to win

Jon Faulkner, President of Alaska Gold Communications, Inc.: Opinion: An Obi-Wan Kenobi moment for the Taylor/English campaign

Todd Lindley, Vice President of Alaska Gold Communication, Inc.: Opinion: We can win with the right mindset— policy over person

Must Read Alaska unequivocally supports the election of a conservative to the Office of Governor but does not endorse a particular gubernatorial candidate. MRAK encourages voters to rank all three Republicans in their preferred order to avoid exhausted ballots.

2 Alaska attorneys debate ballot measure 2 on Monday, September 28

Commonwealth North is hosting a classic Lincoln-Douglas style debate on ballot measure 2, which seeks to repeal ranked-choice voting, jungle primaries, and certain campaign finance laws. The debate will be Monday, September 28, 4:15 PM at the Petroleum Club of Anchorage. Craig Richards, former Alaska Attorney General, will argue for repeal. Scott Kendall, an architect of the current system, will argue against it. Jon Katchen, lawyer and Commonwealth North board member, will moderate.

This is a true debate, not a panel. The two will present their cases in a classic Lincoln-Douglas format: timed constructive speeches, direct cross-examination of one another, and rebuttals, with equal speaking time for each side. The formal debate runs 36 minutes, followed by 15 minutes of audience Q&A.

When: Monday, September 28. Doors open 4:00 PM. Program starts 4:15 PM.
Where: Petroleum Club of Anchorage
Register: Registration is required. In-person and virtual options available. Register here.

Commonwealth North does not take a position on ballot measure 2.

Must Read Alaska supports the repeal effort and encourages voting yes on 2.


Gubernatorial forum hosted by Commonwealth North this Thursday, September 17

Commonwealth North is hosting a gubernatorial forum this Thursday, September 17, 4:00 to 6:00 p.m. at GCI Basecamp (1001 Northway Drive). There is also a virtual attendance option. Three of the four candidates have confirmed.

The doors open at 3:30 and pre-registration is required for both in-person and virtual attendance. No walk-ins.

Each candidate will have 12 minutes to answer the same three questions on the issues that will define Alaska’s next four years:

  1. Fiscal policy. With no long-term fiscal plan and a budget more volatile than any state in the nation, how do we pay for the Alaska we want?
  2. Energy. From Cook Inlet gas to the Railbelt’s future, what is your plan to keep the lights on and costs down for Alaskans?
  3. Out-migration. Working families are leaving Alaska. What will you do to make this a state where they want to stay, work, and raise their kids?

Same questions. Same clock. Your chance to compare the candidates side by side before you cast your vote.

When: Thursday, Sept 17th, 4:00–6:00 p.m.
Where: GCI Basecamp (1001 Northway Dr. Anchorage, AK)
Register: Register Here. Registration required for both in-person and virtual. No walk-ins.

H.R. 6021 protecting Alaska Native handicraft passes U.S. House— Rep. Begich’s 14th bill to pass House

0

On September 14, 2026, the U.S. House of Representatives passed Congressman Nick Begich’s (R-AK) H.R. 6021, the Archie Cavanaugh Migratory Bird Treaty Clarification Act, marking the 14th Begich-sponsored bill to pass the House during his freshman term and another milestone in a historic pace of delivering results for Alaska.

“Alaskans sent me to Washington to get to work and deliver results for our state,” said Congressman Begich. “Today, with our 14th bill passing the House, we are continuing a historic pace, but the number itself is not what matters. What matters is what these bills mean for Alaska: lands returned, promises kept, traditions protected, opportunities restored, resources unlocked, and a stronger future for the next generation.”

H.R. 6021 protects an important Alaska Native cultural tradition by clarifying federal law regarding authentic Alaska Native articles of handicraft containing nonedible migratory bird parts. The legislation honors the legacy of Archie Cavanaugh and helps ensure that federal law recognizes and respects traditional Alaska Native craftsmanship and cultural practices.

The bill is the latest in a growing record of Alaska-focused legislation advanced during Begich’s first term. From resolving decades-old Alaska Native land and entitlement issues to restoring access to Alaska’s resources, strengthening Arctic security, advancing aviation and infrastructure priorities, and creating new opportunities for communities across the state, Begich has moved an aggressive Alaska agenda through Congress at a pace rarely seen from a freshman member.

The latest House passage builds on a first-term legislative record independently recognized by the Center for Effective Lawmaking (CEL). Six Begich-sponsored bills have already become law, tying the record for the most bills sponsored by a freshman House member to become law according to CEL.

The pace reflects a deliberate strategy Begich established from the beginning of his term: identify Alaska’s priorities early, build the relationships necessary to move them through Congress, and use every available legislative opportunity to deliver for Alaska.

H.R. 6021 now advances to the United States Senate for consideration.

Press release provided by the Office of U.S. Congressman Nick Begich.

Alaska surrogate backed by 13 states raising SCOTUS concerns about due process, state sovereignty, and California laws treating children like property

3

Alaska, Florida, and eleven other states asked the U.S. Supreme Court on Friday, September 11, 2026, to pause a Los Angeles parentage order that would take a baby away from his birthmother— an Alaskan surrogate— and give him to the California couple who had demanded he be aborted at 23-weeks after he was diagnosed with a serious, but treatable heart condition. The birthmother, McKenna West refused to abort Baby Gabriel and instead gave birth to him at a hospital in Texas which specializes in treating infants with Gabriel’s heart condition. The case raises serious questions about state sovereignty, due process rights, and the legitimacy of certain surrogacy contracts that give no consideration to the best interests of the child and treat children like property.

The states argue that their interest in the case concerns whether or not California gets to dictate surrogacy law to other states. According to the brief, “If N.G. and O.A. are right about personal jurisdiction and full faith and credit, then California courts and California law will decide the fate of children born via gestational surrogacy all across the country.” Later in the brief, the states argue, “In addition to being unjust to the children (see infra § I.B), California’s “power grab” demeans other states’ sovereign authority to provide for the welfare of children born within their borders. See Mallory, 600 U.S. at 170 (Barrett, J., dissenting). The United States Constitution doesn’t tolerate such incursions into the sovereignty of co-equal States.”

The 31-page amicus brief in M.W. v. Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, N.G., and O.A., No. 26A325, was filed with Circuit Justice Elena Kagan. Florida Solicitor General David M.S. Dewhirst is counsel of record. Alaska Acting Attorney General Cori Mills and Acting Solicitor General Jessica M. Alloway signed for Alaska. Attorneys general from Alabama, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, South Carolina, and Utah joined.

The dispute

The applicant is McKenna West, an Anchorage cardiac nurse and gestational surrogate who signed a contract with Nausheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed of Los Angeles.

A 20-week anatomy scan found hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS), a severe but treatable congenital defect in which the left side of the heart is underdeveloped. Alaska hospitals are not equipped to treat HLHS at birth. Gilkar and Ahmed tried to force West to have an abortion. West refused and relocated to Dallas to deliver at a hospital that could provide care for the infant. Gilkar and Ahmed then tried to force McKenna to give birth in California instead rather than at her hospital of choice. Texas Attorney General Paxton stepped in to protect McKenna’s right to decide where she would give birth and what medical team would assist her in giving birth.

The boy was born August 12, 2026. West calls him Gabriel; the California couple calls him Rumi. Guardian ad litem Susan Duesler assumed responsibility for the child until further court proceedings. He underwent the first round of surgeries on August 17 and survived. West’s stay application and the states’ brief both say the couple have not committed to continued life-saving care. The amicus brief states that, without a stay, the infant “will be discharged from the hospital and handed over to N.G. and O.A. in the coming week.”

How the case reached Kagan

Instead of litigating under the contract’s Alaska forum clause, Gilkar and Ahmed filed a parentage petition in Los Angeles Superior Court. The states’ brief says they “never effectuated service.” West appeared “solely to contest jurisdiction and forum.” Even though California Code of Civil Procedure § 418.11 provides that a special appearance for that purpose is not consent to jurisdiction, the Superior Court treated the appearance as a general appearance. California’s appellate courts summarily affirmed.

After the birth, a Dallas judge gave full faith and credit to the California parentage judgment and dismissed West with prejudice. West, represented by Alliance Defending Freedom and First & Fourteenth PLLC, filed the emergency stay application on September 9. Kagan has ordered a response by 4 p.m. EDT on September 18.

What the states argue

Due process and sovereignty. The brief opens with the question it wants answered: whether a state court may treat a limited appearance to contest personal jurisdiction as consent. “Of course not,” it says. Even if West had consented, the states argue, adult consent alone does not create minimum contacts between California and a child who was never in California and who was gestated in Alaska and born in Texas. They cite Pennoyer v. Neff, Hanson v. Denckla, World-Wide Volkswagen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and last year’s Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization for the dual functions of personal-jurisdiction limits: fairness to parties and respect for coequal state sovereignty.

Full faith and credit and the PKPA. The states say the California order is a “custody determination” under the Parental Kidnapping Prevention Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1738A. An unborn child has no “home state.” Baby G. was not present in California when the petition was filed. Alaska, they argue, had the significant connection: gestation, prenatal care, and the birthmother’s residence. Because the issuing court lacked PKPA jurisdiction, sister states are not required to enforce the order.

Equal protection. California generally requires a best-interests inquiry when determining parental rights but withholds that inquiry from children born under gestational-surrogacy contracts. Citing Weber v. Aetna, Levy v. Louisiana, Trimble v. Gordon, and Clark v. Jeter, the states contend that it is illegal for California to treat children differently because of the circumstances of their birth.

Thirteenth Amendment. The brief argues that government enforcement of a pre-birth contract that transfers a child for consideration, without a best-interests hearing, treats the child as the object of a property right. It does not ask the Court to decide that question now, but it flags the issue as the next collision if California decrees are given nationwide effect.

The Amicus brief also contrasts Florida Statute § 742.15 — which limits gestational surrogacy to a married man and woman, requires infertility or medical need, a genetic link, and bars intended parents from designated “foreign countries of concern” — with California Family Code § 7960, which the states describe as allowing a single, biologically unrelated adult to obtain a child by contract “from any country, for any reason, and with no inquiry into the child’s welfare.”

What the brief does not do

The states say they are not asking the Court to invalidate California’s surrogacy statute or to resolve the Thirteenth Amendment or equal-protection theories in this application. Their stated interest is that California courts not “export” parentage and custody decrees for children with no connection to California, thereby displacing other states’ regulation of surrogacy and child welfare.

Justice Kagan has not ruled. Respondents’ opposition is due September 18. The infant remains in a Texas hospital pending that decision and any further orders.

Read the full Amicus brief

Opinion: Conservative Alaskans need to vote strategically for Governor

3

This article was first published in “Seward’s Folly,” the author’s personal Substack, September 14, 2026.

This year’s gubernatorial election is a perfect storm that could elect Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins as the state’s first Democratic governor in over a quarter of a century.

Despite Alaska being a red state with a large conservative majority, the Democratic Party is trying to use the confusing Ranked Choice voting system to sneak Kreiss-Tomkins into office. They might get away with it if conservatives do not vote strategically and rank every Republican in this race. Conservatives need to take a fresh look at the three viable candidates and rank all three on their ballots to avoid a liberal victory.

Dave Bronson

Dave Bronson

Dave Bronson, the former mayor of Anchorage, is the only candidate in the race with executive experience. As mayor, he was known for boldly confronting the liberal Anchorage assembly when he attempted to implement conservative policies. His supporters know that Bronson has self-confidence and would not be afraid to challenge the Democrat-led caucuses in the legislature. For voters looking for a bold leader, Bronson is your man.

Treg Taylor

Treg Taylor

As former Attorney General, Treg Taylor has experience working inside the executive branch of government in Juneau. Taylor has been controversial, but has one great thing going for him: his choice as running mate.

He picked Candi English, the owner of a large oilfield services company specializing in working on the North Slope. I worked with Candi and her husband Stan for over 30 years. Candi is a superb executive and would do a fantastic job as the Lt. Governor, especially with the responsibility of supervising the Division of Elections. If there were ever a chance to address the election integrity questions in our state, it would happen if Candi English were in charge. She is reason enough to include Treg Taylor when you rank your ballots.

Bernadette Wilson

Bernadette Wilson is running as an outsider candidate aligned with President Trump and his MAGA philosophy. This message has evidently resonated with voters, as Wilson received the most Republican votes in the fragmented primary election. Wilson has significant experience in the political periphery. She was an advisor to Nick Begich’s congressional campaign. She led a couple of conservative nonprofits and was the co-sponsor of a ballot measure to repeal ranked-choice voting. Wilson has been described as a Trump-aligned Republican, which should be enough for conservative voters to include her name when they rank their ballots.

All three of these candidates are superior to the Democrat, Jonathan Kreiss-Tomkins. It doesn’t matter in which order they are ranked on your ballot, but conservatives must include all three of them in some order. If not, thanks to RCV, this year’s governor’s race will turn out like Mary Peltola’s victory in the 2022 congressional election.

The reason is that in an RCV election with multiple candidates, if no one receives 50% of the vote in the first round, in the next round the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, along with all the ballots that selected them as their only choice. This is called exhausting a ballot.

These so-called exhausted ballots favor the party with only one candidate in the race. That is why the Democrats were so anxious to have Tom Begich drop out. With the favorable matchup of one Democrat against three Republicans, there will likely be no outright winner in the first round, meaning the election is likely to go to an RCV runoff. With Republican ballots being exhausted in each round of counting, the Democrat candidate will eventually win.

That is what we are facing unless the Republican voters get smart. The only way to play the game is for conservative voters to rank every conservative candidate in the race. It doesn’t matter if they have a favorite. The primary is over, so it doesn’t matter now. Failing to rank all of the Republicans on your ballots will mean that a Democrat will win. I heard it put best by Representative Sarah Vance in a meeting last night: “Rank all three or get JKT.”

Voters need to take Rep. Vance’s words to heart when voting for governor. Rank the three Republicans in whatever order you think best, but be sure to rank them all and leave JKT off your ballot completely. Failure to rally around all three Republicans will lead to a liberal takeover of our state that could be catastrophic.

More Conservatives Speak on the Winning Strategy

Jim Minnery, President of Alaska Family Council: Opinion: Alaska Family Council speaks on governor’s race, invites Christians to prayer gathering

Dr. George B. Hightower, former 2026 candidate for Lt. Governor: Opinion: The governor’s race is a fight for freedom; here’s how to win

Jon Faulkner, President of Alaska Gold Communications, Inc.: Opinion: An Obi-Wan Kenobi moment for the Taylor/English campaign

Todd Lindley, Vice President of Alaska Gold Communication, Inc.: Opinion: We can win with the right mindset— policy over person

Must Read Alaska unequivocally supports the election of a conservative to the Office of Governor but does not endorse a particular gubernatorial candidate. MRAK encourages voters to rank all three Republicans in their preferred order.

Selawik-raised retired officer expands practical online training for rural Alaska communities

KETCHIKAN, Alaska — Charley McAnally, a retired Alaska law-enforcement officer with more than 30 years of public-service experience, is expanding a practical online training program designed to serve individuals, agencies, organizations, and rural communities throughout Alaska.

McAnally is the founder, lead instructor, and curriculum developer for McAnally Training and Consulting, a Ketchikan-based training company offering courses that can be completed using a telephone, tablet, or computer. The online format is intended to make professional development more accessible to people who may not have the time, funding, or ability to travel away from their communities for traditional classroom instruction.

Although McAnally currently lives in Ketchikan, his connection to rural Alaska is deeply personal. He was raised in Selawik and still has a family cabin upriver, near the place where his father’s ashes were spread. Two of McAnally’s children are NANA shareholders, further strengthening his family’s continuing connection to the Northwest Arctic region.

“Being raised in Selawik taught me the importance of community, responsibility, self-reliance, and helping people when help is needed,” McAnally said. “Those lessons have stayed with me throughout my career and are part of the reason I want this training to reach rural Alaska.”

McAnally’s public-service background includes law enforcement, fire service, emergency medical services, search and rescue, military medicine, industrial safety, instruction, and emergency response. He is a former Village Public Safety Officer and has served as a field training officer, methods-of-instruction trainer, and public-safety instructor.

He also served as an advanced combat medic in the Army National Guard and spent approximately three years in Iraq as an international police trainer. While working in Iraq, he helped train the country’s first police dive team.

Closer to home, McAnally served as a public-safety diver and volunteered in body-recovery operations on the Selawik and Kobuk Rivers. Those difficult missions gave him firsthand experience with the emotional, physical, and operational challenges faced by responders working in remote environments.

“Public safety in rural Alaska is different,” McAnally said. “Responders may work with limited equipment, long transportation delays, extreme weather, and very few available personnel. Training needs to recognize those realities and provide information people can actually use.”

McAnally Training and Consulting offers courses in areas that include:

  • Law enforcement and public safety
  • Fire and emergency medical services
  • Emergency management and disaster preparedness
  • Hazardous materials and workplace safety
  • Search and rescue
  • Leadership and supervision
  • Report writing and professional documentation
  • Instructor development
  • Policy and procedure development
  • Grant writing
  • Community and organizational preparedness

Basic, intermediate, and advanced courses are being continuously developed and added. The company also offers bulk enrollment and agency licensing options for tribes, municipalities, public-safety departments, nonprofit organizations, businesses, and other employers seeking training for multiple participants.

Among the company’s programs is a Grant Writer Certification Course intended to help participants understand how to identify funding opportunities, develop stronger proposals, organize supporting materials, construct realistic budgets, and improve grant-management practices.

When allowed by the applicable funding program, organizations may be able to include relevant training expenses in a grant proposal. Allowability depends on the specific grant, funding source, approved budget, and applicable rules, so organizations should always confirm eligibility with the funding agency.

McAnally said the goal is to provide practical instruction based on real-world experience rather than theory alone.

“Many people in Alaska already carry enormous responsibilities,” he said. “They may be responding to emergencies, supervising employees, writing reports, developing policies, seeking grant funding, or helping keep their communities prepared. I want to give them useful tools that respect their time and experience.”

The online format allows participants to study from their own communities and proceed through coursework without the expense and disruption of unnecessary travel. This can be especially important for rural agencies that may struggle to send employees away for training while maintaining essential local services.

McAnally personally reviews completed examinations and issues certificates to successful participants. He said maintaining direct involvement in the training process helps ensure accountability and gives students a clear connection to the instructor responsible for developing the material.

The company’s statewide outreach is intended to introduce the training platform to tribal governments, municipalities, public-safety organizations, emergency responders, nonprofit groups, private employers, and individual professionals throughout Alaska.

“This is more than a business to me,” McAnally said. “It is a way to take what I have learned through more than three decades of service and make it available to people who are serving their own communities today.”

Additional information and current course offerings are available at McAnallyTraining.com.

Press release provided by McAnnally Training and Consulting.