Thursday, September 18, 2025
Home Blog Page 6

Anchorage mayor complains of peace summit costs, ignores the great economic windfall to businesses

45

Anchorage Mayor Suzanne LaFrance is lamenting that the president’s recent trip to Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson saddled the city with an extra $200,000 in policing expenses. The Anchorage Daily News dutifully picked up the mayor’s complaint, amplifying the cost angle while leaving out an important part of the equation: The economic benefit.

More than 800 journalists and thousands of diplomats poured into Anchorage for the summit between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin, filling hotels, restaurants, and rental cars. That sudden demand represents a major shot in the arm for Anchorage’s hospitality and retail economy.

The city’s 12% bed tax alone meant significant tax revenue pouring into city coffers, likely far more than the $200,000 in police overtime. Add to that alcohol taxes, restaurant sales, rideshare fares, taxi runs, and gift store purchases, and the net effect was overwhelmingly positive, although no entity, such as the Anchorage Economic Development Corporation, has revealed an actual analysis of that economic benefit.

But while no official economic-impact report has been published for Anchorage’s summit, comparable events in other cities show clear short-term boosts in the hundreds of thousands to millions of dollars. Hotel and bed-and-breakfast rooms were going for several hundred dollars a night.

For local hotels, restaurants, and transportation providers, the days surrounding the president’s visit were a bonanza. Long-term benefits are even harder to measure but just as real: Global media exposure, heightened international visibility, and an elevated profile for Anchorage as a venue for future events, investment, and tourism.

It’s also worth noting where the city chooses to put its money. Anchorage was willing to spend $200,000 on team-building exercises for the Anchorage Water and Wastewater Utility earlier this year, yet it hasn’t invested in cleaning up the downtown homeless wasteland that businesses and visitors face every day. No effort was made to reduce the presence of vagrancy during the summit between Trump and Putin.

Now, City Hall is complaining about the cost of providing a safe environment for the president of the United States — a duty most Alaskans would consider a basic responsibility. Add to that, the city’s annual budget is now a record-setting $639 million. The $200,000 in police overtime represents approximately 0.0313% of that budget.

In other words, while the mayor and her allies in the media paint the summit as a financial burden, the reality is that Anchorage likely came out well ahead. The city gained international attention, collected a surge of tax revenue, and gave its business community a welcome lift at the tail end of summer.

As for the extra money for policing, that money will be recycled right back into the economy of the city.

“The municipality will request reimbursement from the federal government,” the mayor’s spokeswoman (freshly recruited from the Anchorage Daily News) told Newsweek in an email. “We don’t expect to have final numbers from all departments for a few weeks. However, it’s safe to say the municipality’s expenses related to the summit were in excess of $200,000.”

Once again, the mainstream media bit on the Democrat talking points to sideswipe Trump’s effort to forge a peace agreement, as City Hall chooses to focus on government costs while ignoring private-sector benefits, telling the public only half the story.

Curtains open on political theater in Alaska, as Trump and Putin take center stage

Trump pushes diplomacy in White House peace summit with Zelenskyy, European leaders

White House weighs inviting Zelenskyy to Trump-Putin summit in Alaska: Report

One arrested for defacing JBER welcome sign during Trump visit

What was in the letter that Melania Trump had hand-delivered to Putin in Alaska — by her husband?

Trump rally in Anchorage draws happy, energetic crowd, while peace talks begin just a few miles away

Trump and Putin land at JBER: Video

Superior Court upholds repeal of Alaska’s 80th percentile rule governing health insurance reimbursements; doctors may appeal

6

An Anchorage Superior Court judge last week upheld the State of Alaska’s decision to repeal the long-standing “80th percentile rule,” a regulation that for nearly two decades had governed how health insurers reimbursed out-of-network medical providers.

The ruling from Judge Yvonne Lamoureux came after a four-day bench trial in February, in which a coalition of Alaska medical associations, including the Alaska State Medical Association, the Alaska Podiatric Medical Association, the Alaska Physical Therapy Association, and the Alaska Chiropractic Society, challenged the Division of Insurance’s repeal of the rule. The groups argued the repeal was arbitrary, lacked transparency, and would harm patient access to care by driving down reimbursements for independent providers.

John Morris: Why Alaska healthcare community sued the state’s insurance division over 80th percentile rule

The judge disagreed, siding with the Division of Insurance, which has long argued that the 80th percentile rule drove up health care costs in Alaska by incentivizing providers to raise their charges in order to capture higher reimbursements.

The 80th percentile rule was adopted in 2004 and required insurance companies to reimburse out-of-network providers at or above the 80th percentile of charges billed in a given geographic area. Supporters said the rule protected patients from being underpaid by insurers and ensured that providers could continue offering care in a state with some of the nation’s highest medical costs.

Doctors vs. State of Alaska and Lower-48 insurers: Lawsuit filed over ’80th percentile rule’

The Division of Insurance and some large insurers, argued the regulation created a feedback loop of escalating charges, since providers knew insurers were bound by the percentile benchmark. After years of debate, the Division formally repealed the rule effective Jan. 1, 2024.

The coalition of doctors and medical associations has not ruled out an appeal to the Alaska Supreme Court. If pursued, the high court would be asked to determine whether the Division’s repeal was legally sound and consistent with Alaska’s administrative law requirements.

Allen Hippler: Repeal the ’80th Percentile Rule’

Until an appeal, the Superior Court decision is a victory for the Division of Insurance.

Read the court ruling here:

Suzanne Downing: Europe’s speech police seek to censor Americans too. What it means for Alaskans

14

By SUZANNE DOWNING

In August, US House Judiciary leaders went abroad to investigate firsthand how Europe regulates speech online. What they found should worry every American who values the First Amendment — especially Alaskans, who travel widely, whether for work in the resource industries, military service, or just to see family and friends.

This isn’t abstract policy talk. What Europe is doing across the Atlantic could soon dictate what you can post, read, or share on Facebook, Instagram, X, or any other major platform. Vague laws written and selectively enforced by unelected bureaucrats in Brussels and London are already pressuring American tech companies to censor political speech — not just for Europeans, but for us.

Last year, during a Judiciary Committee investigation, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg admitted something shocking: Biden administration officials leaned on Facebook to censor Americans, including jokes and satire about Covid-19. He called it “wrong,” promised not to repeat it, and rolled back some of Meta’s censorship policies, which impacted news and opinion leaders, including here at Must Read Alaska.

Thanks to Americans winning that fight, robust debate has returned to the digital town square and dissent is permitted once again.

But now, Europe is trying to drag us backward.

The European Union’s Digital Services Act and Britain’s Online Safety Act give regulators broad powers to punish platforms that don’t scrub undefined “disinformation” or “hate speech.”

In practice, that means censoring political debate. What’s worse, these governments want the rules applied globally, which means your posts in Anchorage, Fairbanks, or Wasilla could vanish because a bureaucrat in Brussels decides it offends “European values.”

Consider this: In the heat of the US 2024 election, the EU warned Elon Musk about hosting an interview with Donald Trump on X, claiming it could cause “spillovers” into Europe. This was the case of one European official openly threatening an American platform over American political speech in an American election. It was just an interview. That’s not just wrong — it’s dangerous.

And what if tech companies don’t comply? Europe threatens them with fines of up to 6–10% of their worldwide revenue. Let’s be clear: That money would come mostly from American consumers and businesses. It’s a backdoor European tax on Americans, dressed up as “safety regulation.”

Alaskans, who travel more than most Americans, may feel the chill of these laws firsthand. Whether you’re checking in with loved ones from overseas, posting a hunting photo, or weighing in on US politics while on a tour of Europe, you could suddenly find yourself muzzled by regulations you never voted for. The ripple effect doesn’t stop when you return home: If companies adjust their global content policies to appease Europe, the same restrictions will apply to your account right here in Alaska.

Europe’s own economy is stagnant. Its leaders, rather than fixing real problems like immigration and growth, have doubled down on censorship. They want to silence critics and export their broken policies to us. We cannot let that happen. This is an opportunity for our own delegation in Washington to weigh in, in order to protect our constitutional rights.

Free speech is the foundation of America. It’s why our ideas thrive and our democracy endures. The Trump Administration is right to put this fight at the top of the agenda, and Congress must keep up the pressure.

The First Amendment doesn’t stop at the water’s edge — and neither should our defense of it.

Suzanne Downing is founder and editor of Must Read Alaska.

Suzanne Downing: Arabella still pulls the strings as left-wing money machine controlling Alaska

Suzanne Downing: ‘We didn’t vote for Musk,’ the Left said. Turns out, he was never in charge

Trump signs Sullivan’s VA accountability bill into law

5

President Donald Trump this week signed into law the Protecting Regular Order (PRO) for Veterans Act, legislation authored by US Sen. Dan Sullivan, which tightens oversight and accountability at the Department of Veterans Affairs after calamitous failures of the Biden Administration..

The new law is a response to events like the historic $15 billion budget shortfall in 2024 that was followed just two months later by a multi-billion-dollar surplus.

The PRO Vets Act is not a critique of the current VA administration but will ensure that n the future, regardless of who is in charge, the VA delivers quarterly, in-person budget reports to Congress for three years, and withholds bonuses for senior VA and Office of Management and Budget leaders in the event of fiscal mismanagement.

Sullivan, a member of the Senate Veterans Affairs Committee, said the law is designed to restore confidence in an agency that exists to serve America’s veterans.

“America’s veterans, who’ve served and sacrificed greatly for our country, deserve a Department of Veterans Affairs that is held to the highest possible standard of accountability,” Sullivan said. “The shocking budget debacle last year made clear that this agency was falling short of the standards our veterans deserve.”

Other Senate Republicans who supported the measure said the law ensures transparency and prevents VA leaders from rewarding themselves amid financial mismanagement. Sen. Roger Marshall (R-Kan.) pointed to the Biden-era shortfall and subsequent bonuses as a “slap in the face” to veterans and taxpayers, while Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) said the VA should be held to the same standards as working families who must balance their own budgets.

The legislation had broad GOP backing, with cosponsors including Sens. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama, Steve Daines of Montana, Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, Chuck Grassley of Iowa, as well as Sen. Lisa Murkowski.

The timeline for the new requirements started in 2024:

Summer 2024 – Veterans Benefits Administration announced $15 billion shortfall, seeks $3 billion to cover immediate needs.

July 31, 2024 – Sullivan and Sen. Kevin Cramer of North Dakota demanded an immediate hearing.

September 18, 2024 – Senate Veterans Affairs Committee held a hearing; Sullivan introduced the PRO Vets Act.

September 19, 2024 – Sullivan attempted to add the bill to a VA funding package; Senate Democrats blocked it.

November 18, 2024 – Sullivan and 15 colleagues demanded more VA accountability in a formal letter.

February 5, 2025 – Sullivan reintroduced the PRO Vets Act with 10 cosponsors.

April 10, 2025 – Senate passed the PRO Vets Act.

July 22, 2025 – House passed the bill.

September 2025 – Trump signed it into law.

Video: Sullivan leads Senate in honoring Korean War 75th anniversary, veterans who served in ‘Noble War’

Jamie Allard: Happy Veterans Day to the next generation

Sen. Mike Shower: Lies told about veterans by the ‘No on 2’ coven should fire up Alaskans to vote ‘Yes’

Kevin McCabe: Trail funding must remain fair and accessible

By KEVIN MCCABE

In Alaska, trails are not just for recreation. They are essential for subsistence, transportation, and keeping communities connected. Yet the Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation has quietly changed the rules for the federal Recreational Trails Program, cutting out municipalities, tribes, and nonprofits that have long built and maintained the backbone of Alaska’s trail system.

Under the new policy, eligibility for the FY26 Recreational Trails Program is restricted to projects on state park lands and their access routes. Nonprofits can apply only if they partner with state parks, while local governments and tribal entities are told to look elsewhere. The suggestion is to apply to the Land and Water Conservation Fund. But that fund is geared toward land acquisition, not trail maintenance, and has neither the scale nor the flexibility to replace the Recreational Trails Program. This shift is not about efficiency. It is about centralizing power, money, and control.

The Recreational Trails Program is federally administered by the Federal Highway Administration and funded by the gas taxes paid by off-highway users. It is based on the user-pay, user-benefit principle and requires a fair distribution of funding: 30% to motorized, 30% to non-motorized, and 40% to diversified projects. This balance has kept Alaska’s trail system strong and equitable.

The Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation’s decision threatens to upset that balance. Motorized users are the largest contributors to the fund and the biggest users of our trails, and most of that activity takes place on borough and tribal lands, not within state parks. If Recreational Trails Program money is limited to state park lands, there is a serious risk that the federally mandated motorized allocation will go unspent or be misdirected. That is not only unfair to users who pay in, but also inconsistent with federal intent.

Despite EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin’s assurances during a recent roundtable in Alaska that he is working to make the NEPA process less restrictive, the state division has justified its new restriction by pointing to federal environmental review requirements and claiming that limiting eligibility will “streamline” oversight.

When you strip away the language, it amounts to consolidating roughly $1.5 million in expected FY26 Recreational Trails Program funds under direct Division of Parks and Outdoor Recreation control. Past fiscal maneuvers make one wonder if this is yet another attempt to steer money toward the Alaska Long Trail, a project that looks glamorous on paper but comes with price tags that should give any fiscally honest policymaker pause.

According to a 2025 feasibility study, developing just 233 miles of identified gap segments between Seward and Fairbanks would cost between $16.3 million on the low end and $35 million on the high end, with annual administration and upkeep alone adding up to $1 million to $4.4 million each year. State capital budget filings also show proposed Alaska Long Trail projects topping $9.5 million for just 14 segments, mostly in Anchorage, and another package of nine projects approved by lawmakers that could cost up to $3.7 million.

At a time when rural Alaskans rely on trails for daily life, harvest routes, school access, and emergency transport, diverting trail dollars into a costly, monument-sized project that benefits a few is not smart stewardship. It is political theater.

Gov. Mike Dunleavy’s Administrative Order No. 359 asked state agencies to seek efficiencies. But real efficiency means doing more with less for all Alaskans, not cutting out the communities who need trails the most, nor sidelining the volunteers and nonprofits who have carried the load for decades.

This new policy undermines collaboration, reduces fairness, and turns a user-funded program into a tool for state bureaucracy. It raises important questions: Was the State Recreational Trail Advisory Committee consulted? Did the division solicit public input from communities most impacted? And has the Federal Highway Administration even approved this narrowing of eligibility?

Alaskans deserve transparency and accountability. The Recreational Trails Program was never meant to be monopolized by one agency or one flashy project. It was designed to serve all users across the breadth of Alaska, in a way that reflects how we live, travel, and recreate.

It is time for the Department of Natural Resources and the Governor’s Office to step in, reverse this decision, and restore broad eligibility. Our trails are not political props or monopolized funding streams. They are a shared heritage that belongs to every Alaskan.

If we let this policy stand, we risk losing the very partnerships and volunteer energy that have kept Alaska’s trails open. Alaskans should speak up now. Contact your legislators and the Department of Natural Resources and demand that Recreational Trails Program funds remain fair, balanced, and accessible to all.

Rep. Kevin McCabe serves in the Alaska Legislature on behalf of District 30.

Kevin McCabe: The next governor must make Port MacKenzie a priority

Kevin McCabe: Ranked-choice voting cheats voters, but Alaskans are fighting back

Kevin McCabe: The intentional delay of a Senate bill leaves revenue reform in legislative limbo

Kevin McCabe: Putting Alaska’s students first in 2026

Northern Edge exercises wrap up for another year

0

Northern Edge 2025, a large-scale, multi-domain joint field-training exercise, wrapped up this week after demonstrating the military’s expanded capabilities in Alaska and the northwestern Pacific theater.

Led by US Indo-Pacific Command and conducted across multiple Alaskan locations, including the Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex and the Aleutian Islands, the exercise involved more than 6,500 service members, roughly 125 aircraft, and seven US and Canadian naval vessels.

Historically focused on high-end air combat training, this year’s iteration emphasized Alaska not just as a training ground but as a defensive position and a hub for power projection into the northern Indo-Pacific region.

Operations featured a combination of fourth- and fifth-generation aircraft, including F-35A Lightning II variants, along with command and control, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance platforms, aerial refuelers, mobility transports, and maritime assets. The USS Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group participated in the exercise in the Gulf of Alaska.

Northern Edge 2025 ran concurrently with Arctic Edge 2025, conducted by U.S. Northern Command, providing an opportunity to strengthen coordination across combatant commands. Marines flying F-35B Lightning IIs from Marine Fighter Attack Squadron 533 supported multiple Northern Edge missions, demonstrating cross-service integration and operational flexibility.

The exercise concluded on schedule, with leaders confirming that the mission objectives were met.

Spotted: Northern Edge exercises have brought a drone to Alaska

What’s up with the jets? Northern Edge 19

‘You’re full of s—’: JD Vance torches Senate Democrats in viral post

Vice President J.D. Vance broke new ground Thursday with an unusually blunt social media post aimed at Senate Democrats, who were attacking the secretary of Health and Human Services.

During a Senate Finance Committee hearing, Democrats sharply criticized HHS Sec. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., with several Democrat members calling for his resignation or removal. In response, Vance took to X to defend Kennedy and attack the senators questioning him.

“When I see all these senators trying to lecture and ‘gotcha’ Bobby Kennedy today, all I can think is: You all support off-label, untested, and irreversible hormonal ‘therapies’ for children, mutilating our kids and enriching big pharma. You’re full of shit and everyone knows it,” Vance wrote.

The post marked the most confrontational use of social media by a sitting vice president, breaking with the traditionally restrained and backset style of the office. Past vice presidents have typically relied on formal statements or surrogates to deliver such sharp political criticism.

Vance’s willingness to use such language to frame his defense of Kennedy wins him points with conservatives who want the Trump Administration to fight the Left and highlights the growing role of social media as a direct platform for top officials to bypass traditional media channels and even their own communications teams.

His post quickly gained traction online, with supporters praising his bluntness and Democrats accusing him of degrading the dignity of his office — another irony that has not gone unnoticed, since they supported Kamala Harris for vice president and for president, and Hillary Clinton before that.

Is Trump’s DoJ planning to try to block transgenders from buying firearms? Daily Wire reports.

In the wake of the latest deadly attack on a school by a transgender-identifying individual, President Donald Trump’s Justice Department is considering blocking trans-identifying people from buying firearms, The Daily Wire is reporting.

“Individuals within the DOJ are reviewing ways to ensure that mentally ill individuals suffering from gender dysphoria are unable to obtain firearms while they are unstable and unwell,” one source inside the Justice Department told news organization.

It may not be what it seems. It’s just as possible that the Trump Administration is merely trolling the Left to see if it will mount a strong defense of the Second Amendment. A ban on an entire category of citizens, after all, would not likely pass constitutional muster, although it’s true that the Trump Department of Defense no longer allows transgenders to enlist in the military.

But after a disproportionate number of mass shootings have been perpetrated by transgenders, the White House’s national security team may be including transgender violence in its overall probe into domestic terrorism.

Many commentators have raised concerns that mass shootings, especially at schools, are increasingly the work of mental unstable individuals who have taken psychotropic drugs or hormones to change their gender appearance.

The news comes the same week that a 25-year-old man who identifies himself as a she/her in Ontario, Canada, was charged with breaking in to a family’s home and sexually assaulting their toddler.

“The fact that the DOJ is considering blocking trans-identifying individuals from owning guns suggests that the Justice Department views the situation very differently. A review by The Daily Wire found that the Annunciation school shooting and the Covenant Christian school shooting are just two examples of a steady stream of transgender-related violence over the past decade,” the Daily Wire wrote.

In a statement sure to trigger transgenders and Democrats,”Democrats have called for common sense gun laws for a long time,” the DOJ source shared on Thursday with the Daily Wire, adding, “This seems pretty common sense to me.”

Read the Daily Wire story at this link.

David Boyle: Anchorage School District must revise its transgender guidelines to protect all students

NEA pushes transgender agenda and ‘inclusive’ sex ed with new teacher kits for school year

Breaking: Supreme Court rules states can curb the medical transgendering of kids

Breaking: Supreme Court says Trump Administration can ban transgenders from military