Friday, November 7, 2025
Home Blog Page 602

Murkowski votes yes, Sullivan votes no, as Senate passes major bill lifting U.S. debt ceiling

The U.S. Senate passed the debt limit bill in a 63-36 vote late Thursday night. It has already passed the House and will now be sent to the president’s desk for a signature.

Sen. Dan Sullivan voted against the bill on final passage, while Sen. Lisa Murkowski voted in favor of it.

In all, 17 of the 49 Senate Republicans voted in favor of passage, including Senators John Boozman, AR; Shelley Capito, WV; Susan Collins, ME; John Cornyn, TX; Kevin Cramer, ND; Joni Ernst, IA; Chuck Grassley, IA; John Hoeven, ND; Mitch McConnell, KY; Jery Moran, KS; Markwayne Mullin, OK; Lisa Murkowski, AK; Mitt Romney, UT; Mike Rounds, SD; John Thune, SD; Thim Tillis, NC; and Todd Young, IN.

Sullivan said the cuts to defense spending, which occur due to inflation, is happening a one of the most dangerous times for U.S. national security in decades.

“I applaud Speaker McCarthy for his hard work in getting President Biden to negotiate a debt ceiling agreement that averts a default, reduces wasteful spending, and authorizes critically-needed permitting reforms—all of which I support. However, I could not vote for an agreement that fails one of the most critical duties of the United States Senate: adequately funding our military service members to provide for the security and defense of our nation,” Sullivan said. “This agreement inflicts significant inflation-adjusted cuts to our military, shrinking the Army, Navy, and Marine Corps. This bill also will take the U.S. defense budget below three percent of GDP—a level we’ve seen just once in the past eighty years, during the peace dividend era of the late 1990s.

“We are not in a ‘peace dividend’ era today. Far from it. America’s military leaders all agree we are in the midst of one of the most dangerous periods for U.S. national security since World War II. This rushed budget simply does not meet the reality and the threats of this moment. I was disappointed that the vast majority of my Democratic colleagues voted against my amendment, which received bipartisan majority support and would have rectified some of these significant defense budget shortfalls,” he said.

During consideration of the Fiscal Responsibility Act this evening, Sen. Sullivan offered an amendment to rescind more than $70 billion in previous Internal Revenue Service (IRS) appropriations in order to fund the Department of Defense’s (DOD) Fiscal Year 2024 unfunded priorities and to fund a five percent increase to the FY 2025 budget beyond the new FY 2024 defense budget topline. All Republican senators voting supported the Sullivan amendment, but it failed to reach the 60-vote threshold for adoption.

Earlier this week, Rep. Mary Peltola of Alaska voted in favor of the bill when it was in front of the House.

The Fiscal Responsibility Act suspends the nation’s debt limit through Jan. 1, 2025, after the November, 2024 election, when all House members, the president, and 33 of the 100 members of the Senate are up for reelection.

An amendment to claw back unspent and unneeded Covid-19 funds failed, with Sen. Murkowski joining the Democrats to vote against it, while Sen. Sullivan voted in favor of it.

Sullivan offered an amendment to take money from the Internal Revenue Service, which was for more IRS agents, and put the money into the Department of Defense. That amendment failed, with all 49 Republicans voting in favor of it.

Sen. Lisa Murkowski offered a statement:

“I voted for the Fiscal Responsibility Act because it is the only way to avoid a default on the national debt just four days from now. While both the bill itself and the process that led to it were far from perfect, it will avert an economic disaster, protect the full faith and credit of the United States, and slightly improve our nation’s fiscal trajectory.

“While the Fiscal Responsibility Act fully funds veterans programs in Fiscal Year 2024, I do not believe it adequately supports the defense budget. After speaking with colleagues on both sides of the aisle, however, I believe there will be sufficient support to pass a supplemental later this year that better addresses our security needs, including continued support for Ukraine.

“I also see this measure as a series of first steps, not final agreements. It leaves us with more work to do to address our debt, reduce the spiraling costs associated with it, and begin to improve the federal permitting process. Beyond the incremental progress the Fiscal Responsibility Act makes, I hope it will build trust and create space for further bipartisan agreement in these critical areas.”

The bill is not an actual appropriations bill, but it raises the level the Department of Treasury can borrow to until after the next presidential election. It caps non-defense spending for a year, expands some work requirements for welfare, and has other provisions.

ConocoPhillips to develop Nuna, will yield 20,000 barrels per day at peak

ConocoPhillips Alaska announced Thursday that the company will develop the Nuna project from the 3T drill site in the Kuparuk River Unit.

ConocoPhillips acquired the Nuna acreage in 2019 from Caelus, which had constructed the gravel road and pad for drill site 3T.

Project construction activities will begin this year and continue in 2024, with pipeline and on-pad construction. Drilling is anticipated to begin in late 2024 with first oil anticipated by early 2025, with an expected peak oil rate of 20,000 barrels of oil per day.

“The additional drilling opportunities we’ve identified at Nuna are a positive development that should increase oil production at Kuparuk,” said Erec Isaacson, president of ConocoPhillips Alaska. “Our investment in this project was approved due to Alaska’s stable fiscal regime which is clearly working to promote new and ongoing investment.”

ConocoPhillips Alaska will continue to invest about $1 billion a year to grow its Alaska legacy business with projects such as Nuna.

The Nuna project will add 29 development wells, on-pad infrastructure and pipelines that tie back to existing Kuparuk River Unit processing facilities. Drill site 3T will be the 49th drill site developed within the Kuparuk River Unit.

 Nana is east of the Colville River and about five miles southwest of the Oooguruk field.

The prospect was announced as a discovery in 2012. To put in perspective the size of the project, the recently approved Willow Project is expected to produce in excess of 160,000 BOPD at peak.

Photo credit: ConocoPhillips’ Kuparuk field camp, ConocoPhillips.

Suzanne LaFrance to run for Alaska House after filing to run for Anchorage mayor? Tuck to run?

WHAT DOES THIS MEAN FOR THE MAYORAL RACE?

Editor’s note: This story did not meet our standards for accuracy and although parts of the story are correct, much of it was based on an inaccurate reading of public filings. Thus, I’ve taken the story down. Thank you for being a reader and thank you to those who pointed out the error. – Suzanne Downing

Video: Biden takes a tumble

President Joe Biden, at the U.S. Air Force Academy graduation in Colorado Springs, Colo., tripped and fell to the stage today, where he had to be lifted to his feet by three Air Force officials nearby.

Biden has had other trips, at times on the stairs up to Air Force One, and once when he tipped over on his bike, but none has been as public or as spectacular as this one.

The president shook it off, pointed at a black sandbag on the stage that had been in his way, and stayed through the end of the graduation ceremony.

Biden is 80 years old and would be 82 at the start of his second term in January of 2025. In 2020, he set a record for the oldest person to ever be sworn in as president.

In 2020, when Donald Trump was running for his second term, the mainstream media wrote extensively with great speculation about the 74-year-old president’s careful gait as he descended a ramp from an aircraft, and the New York Times wrote with glee that he had difficulty lifting a glass of water to his mouth during a speech at West Point.

But for Biden’s fall today, the New York Times played down the incident. The newspaper quoted White House Communications Director Ben LaBold saying, “He’s fine. There was a sandbag on stage while he was shaking hands.”

In fact, Biden had shaken the hand of a graduate, who then walked off the stage, and moments later Biden simply tripped on a sandbag near his feet as he was preparing to walk away.

More homeless talk ahead: Anchorage Assembly chats with selves about sanctioned camps, hosts town halls

Last summer, the leftists in Anchorage called the mayor’s sanctioned homeless camp at Centennial Campground a “humanitarian crisis.” This year, the leftists on the Anchorage Assembly want to create several of them — one in every neighborhood in Alaska’s largest city.

The sanctioned camp plan is the subject of an Anchorage Assembly work session on Friday, held at City Hall, 632 W. Sixth Ave. There are two meetings listed on the calendar having to do with the homeless plans: the first starting at 10:50 am in Room 155, and the second at 1 pm. on the 8th floor in the mayor’s conference room.

Also, three Assembly-hosted town halls to present the the “Clean Slate Strategy” to house homeless will be held on Friday, Saturday, and Monday.

The Clean Slate Strategy is the process the leftist Assembly approved in March to come to a decision on a new permanent year-round low-barrier shelter this year. 

This, after the Assembly refused to erect a navigation center that it approved and that would have been available before winter set in last fall. The Assembly majority did not want to allow Mayor Dave Bronson to have a win on the homeless issue, and thus, the homeless spent the winter in the Sullivan Arena.

“I invite all members of our community to come to these town halls and let your voice be heard,” said Felix Rivera, District 4 Assembly Member and Chair of the Assembly’s Housing and Homelessness Committee. “These town halls will kick off the next phase of the Clean Slate Strategy where we will be talking about shelter, criteria for shelter, and what shelter should look like in the Municipality of Anchorage.” 

The town halls are:

Friday, June 2
5:30-8:30 pm
Loussac Library, 3600 Denali Street
Wilda Marston Theatre

Saturday, June 3
1-4 pm
Loussac Library, 3600 Denali
Wilda Marston Theatre

Monday, June 5
5:30-8:30pm
Loussac Library, 3600 Denali
Wilda Marston Theatre

At the June 6 meeting, the sanctioned homeless camps is on the agenda.

Resolution No. AR 2023-188, a resolution of the Anchorage Municipal Assembly supporting a plan for Sanctioned Camps within the Municipality of Anchorage, Assembly Member Rivera.

10.B.1.a. Assembly Memorandum No. AM 431-2023.

The planned sanctioned homeless camps are:

District 1, North Anchorage | Vacant Land that was formerly Viking Drive from Reeve Blvd. to Commercial Dr.
Total capacity: 50 to 75 individuals
Start date: May 31, 2023
Closure date: August 1, 2023
Structure: Tents
Population: Single adults
Model: Low barrier

District 3, West Anchorage | Clitheroe Center
Total capacity: 30 to 40 individuals
Start date: May 31, 2023
Closure date: September 1, 2024
Structure: Cars and tents
Population: Single adults
Model: Dry, i.e. non-substance use

District 4, Midtown | 40th and Denali, i.e. National Archives site
Total capacity: 50 to 75 individuals
Start date: June 19, 2023
Closure date: September 1, 2024
Structure: Tents; transition to Pallet Shelters and tiny homes
Population: Single adults
Model: Low barrier

District 5, East Anchorage | Centennial Park Campground
Total capacity: 50 to 75 individuals
Start date: May 31, 2023
Closure date: September 4, 2023
Structure: Tents limited only to established campsites
Population: Single adults
Model: Low barrier with structured supports; transition to an intentional camp

District 6, South Anchorage | 1805 Academy Drive
Total capacity: 20 to 40 individuals
Start date: May 31, 2023
Closure date: Year-round operation until such time as the building can no longer be occupied
Structure: ASD relocatable buildings and rooms in the building
Population: Current population staying at the Sullivan Arena
Model: Low barrier with structured supports

On Tuesday, Assemblyman Randy Sulte, Assemblyman Kevin Cross and Mayor Dave Bronson have a resolution on the regular Assembly meeting agenda to commit $7 million to build a shelter and navigation center near the intersection of Tudor and Elmore Roads. 

It’s a scaled back version of Mayor Bronson’s navigation center plan, which the Assembly refuses to pay for. Roger Hickel Contracting is now suing the city to get paid for the work he did on the building site.

The Sulte-Cross-Bronson resolution will be the subject of a public hearing and vote at the Assembly’s June 6 meeting:

Resolution No. AR 2023-182, a resolution of the Municipality of Anchorage appropriating not to exceed $7,000,000 of areawide general fund (101000) fund balance to the areawide general capital improvement projects (CIP) fund (401800), Maintenance & Operations Department, to be used for construction of a Navigation Center And Emergency Shelter at Tudor and Elmore (site 27), Assembly Members Sulte and Cross, and Mayor Bronson. 14.D.1. Assembly Memorandum No. AM 418-2023

Rick Whitbeck: Here’s another horrible tax conceived in the swamp

By RICK WHITBECK

Despite yearslong pushback from small businesses, manufacturers, and consumers, Congress is once again considering “carbon border adjustment tax” legislation which will unfairly impact the oil and gas industry right here in Alaska.

Record high inflation, a looming debt crisis, and the potential for an economic recession don’t seem to be enough to dissuade eco-centric Congressional members and environmental extremists from attempting to push through this destructive legislation. Even more unfortunate is that several Republicans are helping to draft this legislation and pledging support. 

This legislation has many problems, with the very nexus hinging on the false argument that carbon is a pollutant that must be reduced through whatever means necessary. Regardless of the impetus for considering the legislation, the mechanics of the bill are just plain awful.

It would impose a tax, or tariff, on imported goods including aluminum, paper, steel, petroleum, among others, based on the carbon content of the product. Supportive members in Congress and activist organizations allege this tax would discourage pollution from other countries who do not currently meet U.S. standards, or they would face a penalty.

However, the real result of this tax would strain America’s businesses and increase costs for consumers while providing no benefit to the environment.

David Weisbach, an expert in carbon border tariffs, has said these taxes would “unquestionably” raise prices for U.S. consumers earning less than $400,000 a year.

Despite interest expressed by some Senate Republicans in recent years, proposals pushed by climate activists have thus far been roundly defeated. The ramifications of such a tax would be detrimental for Alaska families and businesses across our state. The cost of producing several important goods would skyrocket while the price of importing goods would simultaneously increase.

Who wins in this scenario? If passed, a carbon border tax would push businesses to pass these rising costs directly on to consumers. All Americans would pay this misguided tax. 

In Alaska, we would see a direct hit on the oil and gas, refining, and mining operations as these industries would lose the ability to invest in new projects as well as maintain current operations without passing on higher costs to customers and consumers.

Crazy ESG policies have put a target on the back of Alaska’s oil and gas industry and already make it incredibly difficult to attract capital to invest in new energy projects here. An additional tax would only add to creating a hostile business environment. The road back to energy independence does not include a carbon border adjustment tax.  

Alaska families are already struggling to keep up with the high cost of groceries and everyday goods and are staring down rising gas prices ahead of the summer travel season. This legislation stands in direct contradiction to the fiscally responsible policies needed at a time when Republicans are the only party willing to make spending cuts and tax less. 

Thoughtful discussions are hopefully underway to tackle the nation’s fiscal situation. Entertaining consideration of a carbon border tax at a time of economic uncertainty should not be on the table for Congress.

Rick Whitbeck is the Alaska State Director for Power The Future, a national nonprofit organization that advocates for American energy jobs and opportunities. Contact him at [email protected] and follow him on Twitter @PTFAlaska.

Downing: Can we boycott them all?

By SUZANNE DOWNING

A three-year-old video of a Chick-fil-A executive discussing race relations surfaced this week, thrusting the fast-food chain into an undesired spotlight alongside Bud Light, Target, J.Crew, and Disney.

In the video, Chick-fil-A CEO Dan Cathy shares thoughts on Christian repentance and the need for an “apologetic heart” concerning black Americans. He suggests that white Americans should “pick up the baton and fight for our black, African-American brothers and sisters.”

Filmed during a particularly tense period, as Black Lives Matter violence and looting swept across America, Cathy knelt to shine the shoes of Black Christian rapper, Lecrae Moore.

This act mirrors the biblical story of Jesus washing his disciples’ feet, a not-unheard-of practice in the Christian race-reconciliation movement. The poignant symbolism of washing the feet of those who may harbor anger and resentment toward your race is powerful.

Yet in 2023, this reconciliatory video encountered a metaphorical guillotine. Public frustration with ever-shifting corporate “woke” ideologies has prompted some conservatives to call for a boycott of Chick-fil-A — a chain they helped elevate to the third-largest restaurant chain in the country, behind only McDonald’s and Starbucks.

Critics contend Chick-fil-A has entered the culture wars by also hiring a vice president of diversity, equity, and inclusion, which some perceive as a departure from merit-based employment and a surrender to the “woke” agenda.

However, Chick-fil-A has been simpering for liberal approval for over a decade. Since its inception, the Chick-fil-A Foundation faced vehement criticism from LGBTQ advocates for donations made to pro-family organizations like Focus on the Family, National Organization for Marriage, and even the Paul Anderson Youth Home. Under pressure, Chick-fil-A caved.

In 2019, ThinkProgress chastised the Chick-fil-A Foundation for donating to two Christian groups supporting traditional marriage: Salvation Army and Fellowship of Christian Athletes. The foundation capitulated and ceased donations.

Over the years, boycotts from those opposed to the company’s Christian leanings, even attempts by elected leaders to block franchise openings, have targeted Chick-fil-A. Yet the brand has grown and now boasts over 2,500 locations. Only Alaska and Vermont lack a Chick-fil-A franchise, with Texas hosting the most locations — 471 stores, comprising 16% of the company.

Ironically, sales would often skyrocket on days when a boycott was called, with customers queued for blocks to buy a breaded chicken sandwich. Like Budweiser, Chick-fil-A had become as American as apple pie, with conservatives expressing their support through their wallets.

Nevertheless, Chick-fil-A is not invincible to consumer discontent and should brace for a protracted battle with Americans who are looking to economize their hard-earned dollars.

Anheuser-Busch is a case in point. Since Bud Light partnered with transgender Dylan Mulvaney, the company’s stock price has plummeted over 18% within a month. It might take years to recover, if at all.

Similarly, Target is investing in security near its Pride Month displays, while consumer resentment appears to be escalating. This week, JPMorgan downgraded Target’s stock to “neutral,” citing growing concerns over the company’s waning fortunes. This marks Target’s longest losing streak since 2000.

Disney is also under fire after hiring a man dressed as a “fairy godmother apprentice” to guide girls into a boutique on its property. Disney’s stock has plummeted.

Chick-fil-A, Bud Light, Target, and Disney are not the only brands provoking Americans’ ire. Kohl’s has come under criticism for marketing infant clothing adorned with “Pride Progress” flags. These companies have become emblems of a cultural trend that at least half of America deems detrimental to the very survival of the nation.

Perhaps June is now the month to spend quality time at home with our families and reconsider funding companies that dismiss our values. After all, we’re increasingly hearing that every time you leave the house, it costs you $100. Save money, spend time with your family. And here’s a practical note: You’re likely to need those savings later this year, considering the precarious economic climate America is in.

Suzanne Downing is publisher of Must Read Alaska.

Tickets going fast: DC Draino appears Thursday and Friday in Alaska

Rogan O’Handley, known on social media as DC Draino, will be making appearances in Alaska this week.

O’Handley has millions of social media followers who appreciate hearing from a millennial who is not far-right, but is simply right so far.

A former Hollywood entertainment lawyer who became a conservative commentator, O’Handley battles government corruption and fights for the Constitution and the American Dream, and he does so with clever memes and short, pointed videos.

On Thursday, DC Draino will speak at Settlers Bay Lodge, as part of a spring fundraiser for the Alaska Young Republicans. Also speaking at the event is Hayden Padgett, co-chair of the National Young Republicans. Tickets are $130 for general admission and $199 for the VIP reception, which includes priority seating at the dinner event. The reception is 5:30-6:30 pm, and main dinner doors open at 6:30 pm.

Tickets for the MatSu event are at this link.

On Friday, Draino and Padgett will be at the Egan Center. The VIP meet-and-greet is at 5:30 pm, with general admission doors opening at 6:30 pm. Only 50 VIP tickets will be sold.

Tickets for the Anchorage event are at this link.

Art Chance: Sometimes I hate to be right

By ART CHANCE

In 2018 the US Supreme Court handed down its decision in Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, hereinafter referred to as Janus or Janus v. AFSCME.

At its essence Janus struck down compulsory union dues for public employees as unconstitutional. Unions went into a fit of apoplexy, which could easily have been expected.   Less expected, unless you were some cynical government type like me, was the sight of Republican elected officials shaking in their shoes over the announcement.

The Unions were ready for Janus. A previous case on the same grounds had resulted in a 4-4 decision due to the death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. The unions and the Left saw the handwriting on the wall and began to prepare for public employment in the US to become essentially open shop or “right to work.”

In the “blue” unionized states, the unions had willing accomplices in modifying collective bargaining agreements to impose draconian barriers to employees trying to withdraw from union membership. Union stooge Bill Walker was still Alaska’s governor when Janus was handed down and he and the unions quickly reached agreements to protect union prerogatives and keep as many employees as union chattel as possible. 

I don’t know if they’re still doing it, but for months after Janus was handed down, State human resources people were telling new employees they had to go down to the union hall and sign up to pay dues.

The ”red” states have been more problematic. Over the last couple of decades feckless Republicans have allowed collective bargaining and unionization for police, fire, and teachers in many jurisdictions, even though they have no legal right to bargaining. 

But they do have a right to make political contributions and the feckless Republicans can’t pull their hands back. Just look at how the so-called Republicans in the Alaska Legislature behaved and voted last Session and then go look at who they took money from.

When Janus was handed down most any experienced labor relations practitioner would have known what to do. The people I left behind when I retired would have known what to do. Since it was the union-owned Walker Administration obviously nobody asked them or listened to them. All it would have taken was a letter to each union telling them that the U.S. Supreme Court had rendered their union security clauses unconstitutional and that the State would no longer enforce them. You’d offer a polite invitation to them to come bargain the effects.

Instead, the Walker Administration jumped to their masters’ order and entered bargaining with the unions to secure nice safe contracts to get them past the next election and to keep their mandatory dues schemes intact. The union-Walker junta came apart and Mike Dunleavy became governor. There was a chance to get something right.

I met with Dunleavy’s new attorney general in 2019. He’d been in office a month or so, which is long enough to master the org chart, the directory of state officials, and have some clue what your job is. I’ve worked with and for and supervised a fair number of lawyers and admittedly you wondered who dressed some of them for work, but somehow they’d passed the bar exam. I assure you that a bar ticket is not a certification that the holder has any sense. I left that meeting convinced that that attorney general, now long gone, was an idiot. Nothing since has changed my mind. If you’re a cabinet officer. or even a range 20, you don’t compromise your career and your marriage by playing with the front desk clerk.

I wrote a column here in September of 2019, titled, “Which Way is the Courthouse” or some such. 

My proposition was that the Janus case was a federal question that needed to go to the federal courts, yet the Alaska Department of Law had filed in State court.   

Now I’m just a country boy from Georgia who happens to know a bit about labor relations and I know that nothing in the Alaska Public Employment Relations Act offends the Alaska Constitution, but after Janus, a good bit of it offended the US Constitution.

Last week the Alaska Supreme Court handed down its decision and, funny thing, it reads a lot like my column from a couple of years ago: Compulsory dues are just fine under Alaska law; it’s just that Alaska law violates the U.S. Constitution.

The attorney general had a bunch or Range 24 and 25 assistant AGs working for him, one of which I hired. If one of my Range 18 or 20 entry-level Labor Relations Analysts had brought me the legal analysis that led to that appeal to the State courts, at minimum their career indicator light would have been flashing and it might have been worse. Whomever thought that up for the Department of Law was either an idiot or a crook.

So, now the State has lost in the State courts and it would take a whole new start through the federal courts. The State would be unlikely to win in the Alaska District or in the Ninth Circuit, so a resolution is several years and several million dollars away.

Meanwhile, Gov. Dunleavy and his friends are at peace with the unions, sending our dividends to their friends, and dreaming of carbon credits and the State living off Permanent Fund earnings.   

It isn’t a coincidence that he appointed Alice Rogoff-David Rubenstein’s daughter to the Permanent Fund Board. Maybe Dunleavy can go to the U.S. Senate while his trust fund baby buddies set the table here in Alaska.

Art Chance is a retired Director of Labor Relations for the State of Alaska, formerly of Juneau and now living in Anchorage. He is the author of the book, “Red on Blue, Establishing a Republican Governance,” available at Amazon.