Thursday, July 17, 2025
Home Blog Page 48

Michael Tavoliero: When incompetence becomes evil

By MICHAEL TAVOLIERO

There’s an old adage, that evil triumphs when good men do nothing. But in modern politics, especially here in Alaska, evil often triumphs because incompetent men and women occupy the seats of public trust and do nothing well. The danger is not just what they fail to do, it’s what they enable by failing.

The Alaska Legislature is a perfect case study. Sixty elected officials, all sworn to uphold the Constitution and act in the public interest, preside over some of the most consequential decisions affecting our lives, from energy policy to education funding, health care, and beyond. Yet when we follow the money, by examining Alaska Public Offices Commission reports, we find that many of these officials are financially tethered to special interests who routinely write the very bills these legislators sponsor.

This is not representation. This is outsourcing — moral, intellectual, and democratic outsourcing.

Instead of engaging deeply with the challenges facing their districts, our legislators are rubber-stamping prepackaged bills crafted by lobbyists, political action committees, national nonprofits, and public-sector unions. The legislative process becomes a theater of deliberation while the real decisions are made elsewhere, behind closed doors, at luncheons, or in carefully curated donor roundtables. Competence is neither required nor rewarded.

This is not just laziness. It is a systemic betrayal. When you are elected to serve the people but act on behalf of those who funded your campaign, you are no longer simply incompetent. You are participating in a moral inversion. You are facilitating harm through negligence and cloaking it in the procedural rituals of democracy.

And the consequences are real. We get laws that expand bureaucracy rather than reduce it. We get educational mandates that serve unions, not students. We get Medicaid policies that reward monopolies, not patients. Most disturbing, we get a citizenry that begins to believe corruption is normal and competence is impossible.

Some will say this is just how politics works. But that’s a coward’s answer. It is precisely this mindset—the passive acceptance of systemic failure—that allows evil to metastasize in the body of government.

If we are to rescue Alaska from this descent, we must restore legislative sovereignty and competence. Every bill should come with a transparency tag disclosing its true authorship and affiliations. Campaign contributions must be viewable in real time as floor votes happen. Legislative leadership should be earned through demonstrated integrity and expertise, not partisan loyalty or donor clout. And perhaps most importantly, we must build local drafting capacity—allowing legislators and their constituents to shape laws rooted in lived experience, not distant ideology.

We cannot afford a legislature that governs by submission. Alaska is too vast, too rich in potential, and too vulnerable to waste another decade on political caretakers unwilling to think for themselves.

Incompetence may be forgivable in a rookie. But when that incompetence becomes a mask for power serving everything but the public good, it becomes something far darker.

It becomes evil.

A Decade of Evil Through Incompetence: Year-by-Year Breakdown

  • 2015 – Walker’s Unilateral Medicaid Expansion: The legislature fails to stop a constitutionally questionable executive overreach. The long-term financial liability is silently transferred to future Alaskans, and Indian Health Service obligations are quietly absorbed into the state bureaucracy.
  • 2016 – Education Budget Bloat: Lawmakers increase the Base Student Allocation with no performance accountability, while rural schools collapse under administrative weight. No structural reform is proposed or passed.
  • 2017 – Oil and Gas Tax Credit Flip-Flop: Legislators cave to lobbyist pressures and reverse course on needed reforms, bleeding the treasury to subsidize corporate risk with no long-term strategy for reinvestment or ownership.
  • 2018 – PFD Cuts Institutionalized: After the initial raid, the legislature fails to restore the statutory Permanent Fund Dividend, solidifying a precedent of using citizens’ money to fund government waste.
  • 2019 – Criminal Justice Chaos: House Bill 49, rushed under public panic, replaces SB 91 without proper analysis or local input, increasing incarceration without solving root causes.
  • 2020 – COVID Spending with No Oversight: Billions in CARES Act funds are disbursed with minimal legislative oversight. The legislature recesses rather than taking charge of the emergency budget process.
  • 2021 – Federal Dependency Deepens: Lawmakers eagerly accept American Rescue Plan funds without considering the long-term regulatory strings, further tying Alaska’s sovereignty to Washington.
  • 2022 – Education Industry Capture: Despite abysmal test scores, the legislature gives more money to a failing system without opening it to competition or performance-based reform. Unions write the talking points.
  • 2023 – Ranked-Choice Voting and Voter Confusion: No serious effort is made to reform or repeal a voting system passed by a narrow margin and riddled with confusion. Legislators stay silent to avoid donor retaliation.
  • 2024 – Statehood Undermined in Silence: Legislators fail to act meaningfully against federal land lockup, IHS delegation, or ESG regulatory creep—allowing Alaska’s autonomy to shrink year after year.
  • 2025 – Aggressive Leftward Shift Without Accountability:
    • Plans to expand the Base Student Allocation move forward without any performance metrics or student outcome requirements.Defined benefit pensions return, exposing future taxpayers to unsustainable financial obligations once abandoned for their risk. A suite of “progressive” election reforms, including softened recount procedures, synthetic media loopholes, and ambiguous definitions of “election interference,” are rushed through under the guise of modernization. Energy legislation championed by special interests threatens to raise home heating and utility costs, especially for working families in Alaska’s coldest regions.
    • And once again, the statutory Permanent Fund Dividend is gutted, diverting wealth from individual Alaskans to a bloated government apparatus that refuses to shrink, reform, or justify its cost.

This is not just a list of legislative missteps. It is a chronology of dereliction. These failures weren’t inevitable; they were chosen. Or worse, they were tolerated.

If Alaska is to survive the next 10 years with what spirit and sovereignty it still has intact, we must end this fusion of cowardice and capture. We must demand competence as a moral imperative, not just a political convenience.

Because evil doesn’t always arrive with malice. Sometimes, it walks in dressed as indifference and makes itself at home.

Michael Tavoliero writes for Must Read Alaska.

Lawmakers or lawbreakers? Legislature just cracked the foundation of Alaska’s independent private sector development engine

The Alaska Legislature adjourned Tuesday after passing a combined operating and capital budget totaling $6.2 billion in Undesignated General Fund spending — slightly down from $6.454 billion last fiscal year. When federal funds are included, the total budget swells to nearly $16.3 billion.

But buried in the spreadsheets is a problem: a $180 million hole that lawmakers directed Gov. Mike Dunleavy to fill using funds outside the traditional source.

Rather than tapping the Constitutional Budget Reserve, as has been customary in past years, the Legislature instructed the governor to plug the shortfall using money from the Higher Education Investment Fund, which supports the Alaska Performance Scholarship, and by stripping funds from the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority.

This maneuver raises both legal and fiscal red flags.

AIDEA is a public corporation established by the Alaska Legislature in 1967 with a mandate to promote economic growth and diversification. Its mission is to stimulate job creation and resource development by providing financing and investment for businesses and infrastructure projects across Alaska.

In practice, AIDEA operates somewhat like a development bank. It offers loan participation programs, conduit bonds, loan guarantees, and direct project financing, with a focus on sectors such as energy, manufacturing, and small business. The authority works with financial institutions and development agencies to back projects that align with the state’s long-term interests.

Crucially, AIDEA is governed by an independent board — much like the Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation — and is structured to operate independently from the Legislature’s annual budget process, so it doesn’t become politicized.

But this year, lawmakers decided to reach directly into its coffers.

This decision raises constitutional concerns, particularly in relation to the confinement clause of the Alaska Constitution, which requires that appropriations serve a single, defined purpose. Diverting AIDEA’s dedicated development funds to fill a general budget gap may violate this clause, since the money was never intended to serve as backfill for deficits.

There’s also a strong case to be made that raiding AIDEA’s reserves violates statutory protections that ensure the authority operates outside the highly politicized state budget process. If these protections are ignored, it could establish a dangerous precedent for Alaska’s other independent public corporations, such as the Alaska Permanent Fund.

AIDEA currently has about $500 million in cash reserves. Stripping those funds to cover a one-time deficit not only undermines its mission, but also weakens the agency’s financial health. Bond rating agencies closely monitor liquidity levels when evaluating an entity’s creditworthiness. Reduced reserves could lead to downgraded ratings, increased borrowing costs, and diminished capacity for future development financing.

AIDEA has played a central role in some of Alaska’s most impactful development projects. The authority helped finance the DeLong Mountain Transportation System, including a 52-mile haul road and port facility critical for exporting minerals from the Red Dog Mine, one of the world’s largest zinc producers.

Today, AIDEA continues to back major projects like the West Susitna Access Road and the Ambler Access Project, both of which aim to unlock long-term economic opportunity in remote and rural areas. It also provides financing for commercial ventures, including recent hotel revitalization projects in Anchorage.

If the governor agrees to the Legislature’s plan, it may set in motion a broader dismantling of AIDEA, a move that aligns with the long-standing wishes of some Democratic lawmakers who oppose the agency’s development-oriented mission.

In the short term, lawmakers may have plugged a budget gap. But in doing so, they may have cracked the foundation of one of Alaska’s most important economic tools.

Todd Lindley: Sen. Lora Reinbold was right

By TODD LINDLEY

Protecting the interests of constituents has always been a platitude of political campaigns, with candidates weaving messaging in a way to portray themselves as courageous and heroic for the honor of being elevated to a public office. However, votes matter more than rhetoric. Actions determine whether those platitudes have any substance behind them. 

The new administration is restoring peace and liberty to the American people that the old regime had denied. Heroes of all types have answered the call to public service. But what about those who helped pave the way for the change the country is now experiencing? Unsung heroes like Former Sen. Lora Reinbold (R-Eagle River). 

Just before the Covid-19 pandemic struck, the district she previously represented was home to more than 50% of the military personnel in the state of Alaska. As chair of the Judiciary Committee, she scrutinized Covid policies and mandates to prevent the infringement of violations of civil rights under the guise of public health. Unfortunately, the hearings she arranged and her position on the mandates made her the target of an ethics complaint and ire from Gov. Mike Dunleavy. 

Reinbold has been put upon by the very legal system that is supposed to ensure every American gets a fair shake. She has endured stunning and shameful persecution. It is time to make it right and time for her story to be told.

At a Judiciary Committee hearing on Jan. 27, 2021, then-chair Reinbold invited testimony from Alaska Health and Human Services Commissioner Adam Crum and Dr. Martin Kulldorff, who co-authored the Great Barrington Declaration alongside Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, who is now the National Institute of Health Director. Commissioner Crum outlined the effort that HHS and the Dunleavy administration put forward in the form of mandates, health orders, and actions, including the extension of the emergency declaration. Dr. Kulldorff expressed an opposing argument to lockdowns and health mandate policies and was critical of the public health measures, which did not consider the long-term negative effects of the mandates. 

Things came to a head on Feb. 18, 2021, when Dunleavy issued a blistering letter to Reinbold to stop spreading misinformation to the public about the COVID-19 mandates as Judiciary chair. In a controversial move, the governor blocked all executive branch state resources to her office and refused to respond to the Senate Judiciary Committee: 

This letter serves as notice that all officials and staff, employed and serving the State of Alaska’s Executive Branch of government, will not be responding, or participating, in any matter that pertains to yourself, your office, or, currently, in your capacity as the chair of a committee. 

“I will not continue to subject the public resources of the State of Alaska to the mockery of a charade, disguised as public purpose.”

This letter came at a time when the governor’s disaster declarations were being extended, and the Legislature continued the debate on programs and the necessity of response to the pandemic. HB76 became the conduit by which the state of the emergency would move from a disaster to a public health emergency and maintain the flow of federal funding to support response efforts, mainly mass vaccination of the population. 

Then, on April 19, 2021, the Senate voted 17-1 to remove her from the chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee. 

To make matters worse, Reinbold was banned from Alaska Airlines that same month for allegedly not complying with its mask policy, just three days before the bill was to be voted on in the Senate chambers. Reinbold later sued the airlines, and the case is now before the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

On April 30, 2021, Dunleavy signed a proclamation ending the Disaster Declaration and signed HB76 into law. Following that, Commissioner Crum issued a Public Health Emergency, allowing for the procurement and continuation of services with federal funds. That same day, Reinbold was sued for blocking an internet troll for two and half weeks from commenting on her Facebook page. That case is now before the Alaska Supreme Court.

The damage has already been done.

Reinbold did not seek re-election and instead defended herself in court in McDow v. Reinbold. She sued Dunleavy for malice and defamation and took the airline head-on. Reinbold wants to clear her name and seek due process for the actions taken against her. But it’s bigger than her. Businesses and doctors around the country have been put in a similar position. Far too many people faced punitive actions for challenging the previous administration and, by extension, the state government agencies’ pandemic mandates and vaccination programs. 

On Feb. 18, now former Sen. Reinbold stood before the Alaska Supreme Court to defend herself against the executive branch and those of the Select Committee on Legislative Ethics related to the malicious letter and illegitimate ethics complaint. The counsel for the Ethics Committee and the State of Alaska had previously been granted a motion to be dismissed by Judge Thomas Matthews. Reinbold challenged the ruling. She testified to the high court that the Ethics Committee circumvented protections provided in the ethics laws and denied her statutory due process. 

While Reinbold has spent four years defending her actions in Alaskan courts, on April 23, 2025, a pivotal and long overdue apology by the Department of Defense was issued to the service members who were kicked out of the military for refusing to take the COVID vaccines. Moreover, the White House has publicized facts surrounding the pandemic after a long investigation by the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. Most notable of the attestations are those related to COVID-19 misinformation, the subject of action against Reinbold:

“[T]he Biden Administration resorted to ‘outright censorship — coercing and colluding with the world’s largest social media companies to censor all COVID-19-related dissent.'”

On May 5, President Donald Trump, alongside NIH Director Dr. Jayanta Bhattacharya and HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. , signed an executive order banning “gain-of-function” research. This method of research studied the spillover potential of the virus and led to the development of the COVID-19 vaccines. 

Reinbold was on the front lines against the coercive power that the tech and pharma companies had over public institutions and media. It cost her dearly. But there is hope of victory on the horizon. One thing is clear: The citizens of Alaska know that someone was in their corner when it mattered — when the hardest thing to do was the right thing.

Todd Lindley is on the board of Alaska Gold Communications, the parent company of Must Read Alaska.

Noem, Trump announce new commandant and christen Force Design 2028 to reinvent Coast Guard

3

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Wednesday unveiled a sweeping new initiative to overhaul the US Coast Guard, describing it as the service’s most significant transformation in over a century.

At a commencement ceremony for 262 graduating cadets at the US Coast Guard Academy in New London, Conn., Noem outlined “Force Design 2028,” a Trump Administration plan to modernize and restructure the Coast Guard for the challenges of the 21st century.

“A new chapter for America’s Coast Guard, one like we have never seen before, starts right now,” Noem told cadets and families gathered on Cadet Memorial Field.

“Now, more than ever, the American people need a strong and capable Coast Guard,” said Noem. “The Coast Guard must not simply evolve. It must revolutionize how it functions and operates to ensure decisive advantage over adversaries. This requires a fundamental change. Force Design 2028 is the bold blueprint needed to drive urgent action and win.”

Noem also announced President Donald Trump’s nomination of Adm. Kevin E. Lunday to serve as the 28th commandant of the Coast Guard. Lunday will continue serving as acting commandant until confirmed by the U.S. Senate. Lunday replaces former Commandant Linda Fagan, who was relieved of her duties on Trump’s second day in office, Jan. 21. Lunday has ben serving in an acting capacity since then. He will require congressional approval.

The Force Design 2028 initiative centers on four strategic focus areas: people, organization, acquisition and contracting, and technology. Key goals include increasing the Coast Guard workforce by 15,000 personnel, modernizing outdated infrastructure, streamlining leadership, and enhancing maritime and air operational capabilities.

Noem described Force Design 2028 as a “roadmap to revolutionize the Coast Guard” and said it would address longstanding readiness gaps.

FD2028 outlines several key initiatives and improvement areas:

  • Establish a service secretary: This initiative establishes a legislatively authorized, secretary of the Coast Guard nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. This secretary would report directly to the secretary of Homeland Security and provide civilian leadership, oversight, accountability and advocacy, with authorities comparable to secretaries of other military services.
  • People: FD2028 seeks to grow the Coast Guard’s military workforce by at least 15,000 members by the end of fiscal year 2028 to restore readiness and support a growing fleet and new capabilities. Initiatives include transforming the workforce by aligning with the president’s executive order on “Restoring America’s Fighting Force” and instituting a physical fitness test, modernizing enlisted accessions and investing in recruiting incentives, investing in officer leader growth through various programs, revitalizing the Coast Guard Reserve with a focus on mobilization readiness and streamlining policies and processes for the civilian workforce.
  • Organizational Design: Reform the Coast Guard’s organizational structure to become more effective, enabling a leaner, more agile and strategically focused Headquarters by streamlining processes and eliminating redundancies. Key initiatives include designing the future force to win by embracing strategic planning and establishing a futures development and integration function, creating program executive offices for a systems-focused approach to acquisitions and sustainment, establishing a Deployable Specialized Forces command for improved integration and interoperability, strengthening Coast Guard Cyber Command to address cyber and space threats, transferring operational and service-delivery functions out of headquarters.
  • Technology: Position the Coast Guard to become a leader in the adoption and use of advanced technology, human-machine teaming and data. Initiatives include creating Coastal Sentinel, a next-generation integrated sensor network leveraging artificial intelligence for unprecedented threat identification, supporting a revitalized U.S. maritime industry by replacing antiquated systems for vessel registration and mariner credentials, supporting workforce growth with a modern human resources information technology system incorporating artificial intelligence, delivering an improved logistics system for conditions-based maintenance, and establishing a rapid response prototype team to quickly identify, adopt and deliver advanced technology capabilities.
  • Contracting and acquisitions: Streamline processes to better respond to emerging threats, strengthen industry coordination and prioritize speed and flexibility. The service will reform acquisition practices to deliver needed capabilities—including icebreakers and unmanned systems, while managing risk. Changes include establishing a disciplined requirements process, assigning senior acquisition authority to the secretary of the Coast Guard, creating a senior procurement executive role, outsourcing procurement activities for effectiveness and designating single points of accountability to empower program managers. 

The Coast Guard, which operates under the Department of Homeland Security in peacetime, has faced chronic funding and personnel shortages in recent decades. The Trump Administration’s Force Design 2028 aims to reverse that trend with a comprehensive, forward-looking strategy.

The initiative, as Noem put it, the start of “a new era for America’s Coast Guard.”

In addition to Lunday, Trump announced these new officers:

  • VADM Thomas G. Allan Jr. – Vice Commandant 
  • RADM Douglas M. Schofield – Chief of Staff 
  • VADM Nathan A. Moore – Deputy Commandant for Operations 
  • RADM Jo-Ann F. Burdian – Atlantic Area Commander 
  • RADM Joseph R. Buzzella – Pacific Area Commander 

Read the FD 2028 executive report here.

Second time’s a no: Fairbanks Council rejects ‘colonizer confession’ ordinance

The Fairbanks City Council declined on Monday to approve an ordinance that would require a formal “land acknowledgment” at the beginning of every regular council meeting, marking the second time in three years the body has rejected such a proposal.

Ordinance No. 6314, sponsored by Council members Valerie Therrien and Crystal Tidwell, would require the oral reciting of a confession that the land in Fairbanks belongs to indigenous peoples whose traditional territories include the Fairbanks area. Therrien and Tidwell are registered Democrats.

Currently, a version of the acknowledgment is displayed on the chamber wall, and council members may optionally include it in their own remarks.

The measure was pulled from the consent agenda by member Lonny Marney, a Republican who raised concerns about the ordinance before it could move forward to a public hearing. Following debate, the council voted to halt its progression.

Opponents of the ordinance cited concerns that a mandatory acknowledgment is divisive and questioned whether it might open the door to similar requests from other identity groups, which could complicate and delay council meetings.

In Anchorage, the “colonizer confession” is formalized. Since 2020, the Anchorage Assembly has opened its meetings with a formal land acknowledgment recognizing the Dena’ina Athabascans as the traditional stewards of the land.

In March 2025, Assemblymember Meg Zaletel introduced a new ordinance to have the acknowledgment permanently displayed in Assembly Chambers alongside the American and municipal flags.

The Anchorage School Board adopted a formal colonizer confession policy in 2022 requiring statements to be read at a variety of events, including board meetings, graduations, and weekly school gatherings. The initiative was developed in partnership with the Native Village of Eklutna, population 70, and the school district’s Indigenous Education Department.

Some University of Alaska campuses use a colonizer confession, and the Juneau School Board adopted the required confession in 2021, to recognize the Tlingit people at the beginning of full board meetings as the true owners of the land.

Feds gone wild? House committee probes $40 billion in government credit card spending on gambling, dating, massage parlors, spas, and more

The US House Committee on Oversight and Accountability has launched an investigation into federal employee charge card spending, following a startling audit revealing that government bureaucrats maintain approximately 4.6 million active charge card accounts, racking up $40 billion in spending in the last fiscal year alone.

The probe follows a report released this month by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which has already deactivated over 500,000 unused or unnecessary federal charge accounts. The DOGE findings raised red flags about potential abuse, waste, and fraud, especially within the Department of Defense.

Among the most disturbing revelations: more than 11,000 transactions at “known high-risk merchants,” including casinos, bars, nightclubs, massage parlors, and adult entertainment venues.

The Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. James Comer of Kentucky, along with Senate DOGE Caucus Chair Sen. Joni Ernst of Iowa has called for a comprehensive government-wide review of federal charge card usage. In a detailed letter to Comptroller General Gene Dodaro of the Government Accountability Office (GAO), the lawmakers demanded answers and reforms.

“With tens of billions in taxpayer funds at stake each year, a comprehensive assessment is urgently needed to identify systemic risks, eliminate inefficiencies, and restore accountability,” the letter reads.

The audit from DOGE cited a January 2025 Department of Defense Inspector General report that found 7,805 transactions at high-risk businesses such as casino ATMs and mobile app stores, and 3,246 purchases at bars and nightclubs during holidays or major sporting events.

The GAO has previously flagged similar issues, including a lack of oversight tools, poor data analysis to detect fraud, and unclear criteria for card issuance.

Defense officials in charge of purchasing who were interviewed by GAO were unable to provide examples of how they analyze card spending to identify cost savings or detect misuse.

The lawmakers have asked GAO to examine transaction data across a sweeping array of Merchant Category Codes tied to questionable spending, including:

  • Adult entertainment and gambling (MCC 7841, 7995, 9754)
  • Online dating services (MCC 7273, 7277)
  • Luxury and non-essential items like fur shops, wig stores, and jewelry (MCCs 5681, 5698, 5094)
  • Cannabis and vaping products (MCCs 8398, 5993)
  • Massage parlors and beauty spas (MCCs 7297, 7298)
  • Cruise lines and timeshares (MCCs 4411, 7012)
  • Weight loss products, babysitting services, and horoscopes (MCCs 5499, 7295, 7999)

Comer and Ernst are seeking answers to 12 key areas of concern, including:

  • How agencies determine which employees receive charge cards
  • Monitoring controls and enforcement actions for misuse
  • Frequency of high-risk transactions
  • Use of anti-fraud systems such as Visa’s IntelliLink
  • Amount spent on late fees and inactive card management
  • Best practices from agencies with effective card controls

The Oversight Committee’s request builds on two decades of reports from GAO highlighting persistent problems in the federal charge card system, dating back as far as 2003.

The Government Accountability Office has not yet issued a timeline for the review.

Muskox on the move: Rep. Stutes files for Senate to represent District C

As soon as the Legislature adjourned on Tuesday, Rep. Louise Stutes, a registered Republican who has caucused with the Democrats for all of her career, quietly filed to run for Senate.

The seat she would serve in is now occupied by Senate President Gary Stevens, who has been rumored to be retiring.

Sen. Stevens, also a Republican, represents Senate District C, which includes Kodiak, Homer, Seward, and Cordova. He is 83 and has served in the Alaska Legislature since 2001, first in the House and then in the Senate beginning in 2003. Whether he would want to run again in 2026 is unlikely, as it would set him up to serve into his late 80s.

Stevens has held the position of Senate President multiple times, most recently during the current session, which will reconvene in January after gaveling out on Tuesday. 

Rep. Stutes has represented Kodiak in the Alaska House of Representatives since 2015 and served as House Speaker from 2021 to 2023. Throughout her tenure, she has been primarily associated with Democrat policies and political alliances and is the remaining member of what was dubbed the “Muskox Caucus” of left-leaning Republicans that broke away from the Republican majority in 2016.

Willy Keppel: Defined benefits is a model that punishes families, fails students, protects bureaucrats

By WILLY KEPPEL

I know this won’t be a popular take, but I’ve got to disagree with both friends and foes when it comes to the idea of returning to a Defined Benefits retirement system for public employees. Two of my friends are teachers, and they’ve made their case for what they call the “golden parachute.” I still can’t get on board.

I’m a supporter of the Defined Contributions system — and for good reason. We’ve been down the Defined Benefits road before. When oil money was flowing and the state was flush with cash, bureaucrats and union leaders teamed up to create overly generous pensions, promising the world without a plan to pay for it. It became a spiral slide to financial ruin, and by 2006, common sense finally prevailed in Juneau. Defined Benefits were scrapped in favor of a more sustainable system: Defined Contributions.

Now, the unions want to drag us back, telling lawmakers it’s affordable, it boosts employee loyalty, and it’s necessary to attract workers. But none of those claims are backed by evidence. In fact, data from other states show they’re simply not true. What we’re hearing now is smoke and mirrors: magical math and political pressure campaigns dressed up as policy arguments.

Meanwhile, the education system itself is bleeding students and families are voting with their feet. Alaska now has 22% of students in homeschooling or charter school programs. In Anchorage, more than 6,000 students have left the school district, and instead of closing all six schools they considered in 2022, they only closed two, then turned another into a Native charter school, which drew even more families out of the system.

This isn’t a funding issue. It’s a failure to adapt. The public education model is becoming a dinosaur, too slow to evolve while parents seek better options. The bureaucracy, DEI-focused curricula, and declining performance have pushed people away. The formula isn’t broken because of inflation — it’s broken because families no longer trust the product.

And while all this happens, state leaders are still raiding the Permanent Fund Dividend, the last vestige of wealth Alaskans actually see, to prop up a failing system. According to a UAA ISER study by economist Matt Berman, using PFD cuts to fund government is the most regressive tax imaginable. It hurts poor and working-class families the most and drives people out of Alaska. That’s not just a theory; it’s $20,000 per child lost when a family leaves the district. That’s not inflation. That’s a government-created death spiral.

We need to do what any business would do when the customer base shrinks: cut costs. That starts with school closures where enrollment no longer justifies the cost. It also means reducing administrative bloat by consolidating Alaska’s 53 school districts down to 10 or fewer. And let’s get real about those so-called “vacant” positions in Anchorage. Over 200 “ghost” teaching jobs still get pink slips each year. If they’re unfilled, they’re unfunded positions, and they should be cut.

Yet every time we turn around, the unions are demanding more — more money, more benefits, more staff — while performance declines and enrollment collapses. And the Legislature? They’ll slash the PFD in a heartbeat but won’t touch the bloated education budget

Just this week, legislators who say they support the 75/25 PFD split, like Senators Lyman Hoffman and Bert Stedman, turned around and backed an 83/17 split instead. That’s nearly $180 million taken from each of their Senate districts. That’s money ripped out of the hands of every man, woman, and child in favor of a top-down “we know best” approach that keeps failed systems on life support.

And don’t get me started on campaign finance “reform.” Every proposal limits how much you and I can donate, while leaving union and PAC money untouched. No wonder Alaska’s collapsing. No wonder families are leaving for more affordable states.

See Spot run. See Spot run away. 

That old first-grade reader rings painfully true today: Families are running, and it’s the system that refuses to change that’s chasing them away.

So no — I won’t support going back to Defined Benefits. I won’t support more empty promises from unions. And I won’t support a school funding model that punishes families, fails students, and protects bureaucrats.

We need reform. Not regression.

Willy Keppel is a longtime trapper and fur trader in Western Alaska.

Republican women are ‘handmaidens to the patriarchy’ — except Sen. Lisa Murkowski, of course, Hillary Clinton says

It’s the new “basket of deplorables.”

In an interview at the New York 92nd Street Y(MCA) on May 1, former Secretary of State (and former Senator and former First Lady) Hillary Clinton called attention to a short list of Republican women she views as principled and independent. The list was so short that the only one who came to mind for Clinton was Alaska’s Sen. Lisa Murkowski, due to her resistance to what Clinton characterized as patriarchal forces dominating the Republican Party.

A little history about Murkowski and the patriarchy: Murkowski was handpicked by her father for her seat in the Senate when Sen. Frank Murkowski left the Senate to become governor of Alaska in 2002. The patriarchy has worked out well for Lisa Murkowski.

The conversation, part of an event promoting Clinton’s new book, “Something Lost, Something Gained: Reflections on Life, Love, and Liberty,” was moderated by author Anna Quindlen.

During the discussion, Clinton was asked whether there were any Republican women she respected for standing up to party orthodoxy and male-dominated political dynamics. Clinton responded by naming Murkowski as one of the “few” Republican women she admired for not acting as a “handmaiden to the patriarchy.”

Clinton highlighted Murkowski’s voting record as evidence of her independence, citing her high-profile opposition to the confirmation of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh in 2018 and her support for bipartisan efforts such as the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act. These moves, Clinton suggested, were examples of political courage rarely seen in today’s Republican ranks.

When Quindlen brought up Cheney, Clinton nodded in agreement.

Of course, Liz Cheney also benefited from the “patriarchy.” She owes her political power to her father, former Vice President Dick Cheney, who was also secretary of Defense and an influential Republican figure. He provided Liz with a powerful political network, name recognition, platform, and access to elite GOP circles from an early age.

Clinton suggested that both Cheney and Murkowski had prioritized constitutional principles and democratic norms over party loyalty, a choice she implied was increasingly rare among Republican women in national politics.

Clinton’s use of the term “handmaiden” is a sharp reference to women who, in her view, conform to or uphold patriarchal structures.

The term is also used in reference to Margaret Atwood’s dystopian novel, “The Handmaid’s Tale,” which portrays a future in which women are simply used for breeding. During the previous Trump Administration it became popular for Democrat activist women to dress in the attire of the concubines portrayed in the novel and play act at being oppressed.

Clinton, a longtime advocate for the killing of unborn children, has frequently criticized the Republican Party’s push for more restrictive abortion laws and the role she believes conservative women play in supporting those policies.

It was classic Clinton elitism. In 2016, while running for president, Clinton used the phrase “basket of deplorables” during a speech at a fundraiser in New York City.

She said at the time, “To just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump’s supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it.” 

Now, Republican women are “handmaidens to the patriarchy.” Possibly just part of the previously mentioned basket of deplorables.

Media outlets including The Hill and Politico noted that Clinton’s comments reflect her broader critique of the GOP’s treatment of women and its continued alignment with Trump-era priorities.

For Murkowski, who faces ongoing tensions within her own party, and who is loathed by many Alaska Republicans, the recognition from Clinton may not bring welcome attention in a state that voted heavily for Donald Trump — not just once, but three times.