Wednesday, June 17, 2026
Home Blog Page 479

Alexander Dolitsky: Setting the record straight on Israel’s history with Palestinians

By ALEXANDER DOLITSKY

“Palestinian residents are helpless victims in attacks made by leaders,” written by Dixie Belcher and published in the Juneau Empire on Feb. 26, was a perfect and unfortunate example of how historic events and factual truth can be misconstrued by an amateur historian claiming to be an “expert” and a “leader” in the movement for world peace.

Not only did Belcher misconstrue the reality of the Israel/Gaza conflict, she also managed to convolute statistical data and historic events related to this subject.

Let me present several misleading statements from Belcher’s article:

“In 1948 the United Nations gave the country of Palestine to European Jews escaping hundreds of years of pogroms, ending with the murder of six million Jews by the Nazis. These Jews were escaping hell.”

This narrative is a complete nonsense and far from the factual truth. Pogroms were brutal government-organized destruction of the Jewish settlements, mostly on the territory of the former Russian Empire (today Ukraine, Belorussia, Poland, etc.). In fact, my grandparents were victims of pogroms. The anti-Semitic practice of pogroms ended in the early 1920s under the Bolsheviks’ rulings of a newly formed Soviet Union in 1922.

In 1948, the Soviet Union and other Soviet East European countries were closed for migration and no Jews could leave those countries to Israel until 1973, after President Richard Nixon and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger negotiated with the Soviet Union a departure of the Soviet Jews to Israel and to other Western countries.

I left the former Soviet Union in 1977 under the status of a political refugee with the Israeli visa, and then detoured to the United States, arriving in Philadelphia on Feb. 1, 1978. Later, my immediate family joined me in Philadelphia in 1979.

In 1948, after Israel was re-born again under the auspices of the United Nations, most Jews that had settled in their historic homeland (Judeo/Israel) arrived from Iraq, Iran, Egypt, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and other Middle Eastern territories. Today, virtually no Jews left in those Middle Eastern countries. Many Soviet Jews immigrated to Israel in the 1970s and 1980s.

Belcher falsely stated that, “Gazans have the highest level of education of any other group in the world and the lowest level of illiteracy.”

Really, not Singapore, Finland, or the U.S.? Where did this peculiar data come from? Indeed, from kindergarten on, Gazans teach their children to hate and, eventually, to exterminate their nearest neighbor—Israel—and all Jews worldwide. How can anyone in the right conscious negotiate a peaceful agreement or two-state coexistence with a nation committed to this type of hateful ideology?

Here is another “beauty” from Belcher’s article: “Frustrated with the Palestinian Authority, in 2006 they [Gazans] voted in Hamas, hoping for change. There was never another election. Gazans grew to hate them—realizing that Hamas didn’t care about the lives of the Israelis or the Gazans.”

Indeed, Palestinians voted the terrorist organization, Hamas, to govern Gaza. Even today, some polls conducted by independent organizations suggested that most Gazans support Hamas’ heinous attacks on Israel; given a chance, they will attack Israel again and again, and again…. until its complete annihilation “From the river to the sea.”

Belcher continues her remarkably distorted statements: 

“The Jews, desperate for safety and a country they could call their own, forcibly expelled 750,000 Palestinians to Jordan, Lebanon, and other countries, blew up 500 villages, marching their occupants across the desert to Gaza which they surrounded with barbed wire and soldiers. Now an open-air prison of 2½ million dependent on food, clean water, medicine and fuel from their captors. Their lives have been difficult—no one I’ve met wants to be there. They long to “go home” to their villages.

This narrative is nothing based on the factual truth, and I don’t even know where to start in dismantling it. In fact, the entire Belcher’s column is full of false assertions and a complete lack of understanding of Middle Eastern and Jewish history. Belcher is not alone in her bias and uneducated assertions on this subject. The far-left media notoriously make various historical and statistical errors that lead the public to a divisive conclusion on Israel–Gaza/Hamas wars.

CREATION OF MODERN-DAY ISRAEL

The Arab-Israel conflict in the Middle East is centuries old. The conflict over land is particularly perplexing. Before the time of Christ, the Jewish people lived in their own kingdom; a Jewish-ruled state was located where Israel is today. In 586 B.C., however, the Babylonian Empire defeated Israel.

As a result, many Jews were brought to Babylonian as slaves. Returning to their homeland after years of captivity, the Jewish people constructed a new state, only to then be incorporated into the Roman Empire. Then, in 70 A.D., the Romans destroyed the Temple in Jerusalem, and the Jewish people scattered throughout the Roman Empire and beyond. From this time until 1948, Jews had no state.

During the intervening centuries prior to 1948, Palestinian Arabs and the Islamic religion predominated in the territory where Israel had been. The Palestinians, like the Jews, claimed the territory as their own. Thus, at one time or another, Palestinian Arabs and Jews both owned the land at the eastern end of the Mediterranean.

This leads to a question, “Whose land is it?” Unfortunately, there is no simple, universally accepted answer.

In 1948, the United Nations proposed that Palestine be partitioned, with Jewish state being created along the Mediterranean coast and Palestinian state inland. It was not a perfect solution, and few people, least of all the Arabs, were pleased with it. But, at least, it was a solution, and both superpowers, the United States and the Soviet Union, were behind it.

ISRAEL-GAZA/HAMAS WAR

Far-left media and activists accuse Israel of excessive and disproportionate use of force against Gaza/Hamas in defending itself in today’s war initiated by Gaza. Historically, there have never been proportionate wars. None.

On Dec. 7, 1941, Japan launched a surprise aerial attack on the U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. The attack killed 2,403 U.S. personnel, including 68 civilians, and destroyed or damaged 19 U.S. Navy ships, including eight battleships.

In response, on Aug. 6 and Aug. 9, 1945, the United States detonated two atomic bombs over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The bombings killed between 129,000 and 226,000 Japanese respectively, most of whom were civilians, and remain the only use of nuclear weapons in an armed conflict.

The allied bombing of Germany from 1942-1945 almost completely ruined several major cities (Dresden, Berlin, Cologne), in bombing essential infrastructure and, in the process, killing thousands of civilians. Nearly 27 million Soviets were killed during the war, including some of my relatives in Kiev, compared to nearly 9 million civilian and military Germans killed by allied forces during the war.

On Sept. 11, 2001, the Arab terrorists attacked and killed 2,977 people and injured thousands at the World Trade Center in New York, the Pentagon in Washington D.C., and in Somerset County, Penn.

In response, the United States and its allies invaded two countries — Iraq and Afghanistan — and, in the process, disproportionately killed and wounded tens of thousands of civilians and military personnel.

The causes of the Oct. 7, 2023, heinous Hamas attack on Israel are deeply rooted in multi-faceted historic, religious and ethnic issues of global terrorism. Historically, terrorism has always been a complex problem for humanity and for peace-seeking nations. Only united will we win against anti-Semitism and world terrorism.

Alexander B. Dolitsky was born and raised in Kiev in the former Soviet Union. He received an M.A. in history from Kiev Pedagogical Institute, Ukraine, in 1976; an M.A. in anthropology and archaeology from Brown University in 1983; and was enroled in the Ph.D. program in Anthropology at Bryn Mawr College from 1983 to 1985, where he was also a lecturer in the Russian Center. In the U.S.S.R., he was a social studies teacher for three years, and an archaeologist for five years for the Ukranian Academy of Sciences. In 1978, he settled in the United States. Dolitsky visited Alaska for the first time in 1981, while conducting field research for graduate school at Brown. He lived first in Sitka in 1985 and then settled in Juneau in 1986. From 1985 to 1987, he was a U.S. Forest Service archaeologist and social scientist. He was an Adjunct Assistant Professor of Russian Studies at the University of Alaska Southeast from 1985 to 1999; Social Studies Instructor at the Alyeska Central School, Alaska Department of Education from 1988 to 2006; and has been the Director of the Alaska-Siberia Research Center (see www.aksrc.homestead.com) from 1990 to present. He has conducted about 30 field studies in various areas of the former Soviet Union (including Siberia), Central Asia, South America, Eastern Europe and the United States (including Alaska). Dolitsky has been a lecturer on the World Discoverer, Spirit of Oceanus, andClipper Odyssey vessels in the Arctic and sub-Arctic regions. He was the Project Manager for the WWII Alaska-Siberia Lend Lease Memorial, which was erected in Fairbanks in 2006. He has published extensively in the fields of anthropology, history, archaeology, and ethnography. His more recent publications include Fairy Tales and Myths of the Bering Strait Chukchi, Ancient Tales of Kamchatka; Tales and Legends of the Yupik Eskimos of Siberia; Old Russia in Modern America: Russian Old Believers in Alaska; Allies in Wartime: The Alaska-Siberia Airway During WWII; Spirit of the Siberian Tiger: Folktales of the Russian Far East; Living Wisdom of the Far North: Tales and Legends from Chukotka and Alaska; Pipeline to Russia; The Alaska-Siberia Air Route in WWII; and Old Russia in Modern America: Living Traditions of the Russian Old Believers; Ancient Tales of Chukotka, and Ancient Tales of Kamchatka.

Read: Russian Old Believers in Alaska live lives reflecting bygone centuries

Read: Russian saying: Beat your friends so your enemies fear you

Read: Neo-Marxism and utopian Socialism in America

Read: Old believers preserving faith in the New World

Read: Duke Ellington and the effects of Cold War in Soviet Union on intellectual curiosity

Read: United we stand, divided we fall with race, ethnicity in America

Read: For American schools to succeed, they need this ingredient

Read: Nationalism in America, Alaska, around the world

Read: The case of the ‘delicious salad’

Read: White privilege is a troubling perspective

Read: Beware of activists who manipulate history for their own agenda

Read: Alaska Day remembrance of Russian transfer

Read: American leftism is true picture of true hypocrisy

Read: History does not repeat itself

Read: The only Ford Mustang in Kiev

Read: What is greed? Depends on the generation

Responses to Supreme Court ruling: Trump jubilant, Haley talks girl power, Biden powers up on gun control, and Olbermann wants SCOTUS dissolved

The unanimous Supreme Court ruling that said states can’t keep a duly-filed presidential candidate — Donald Trump — from their ballot was met with reactions that spanned soup to nuts on Monday.

The court announced its decision at 10 am. Eastern time. Soon, Trump was posting on Truth Social, “BIG WIN FOR AMERICA!” and another post with a picture of him hugging the flag.

“You cannot take somebody out of a race because an opponent would like to have it that way. The voters can take the person out of the race very quickly, but a court shouldn’t be doing that and the Supreme Court saw that,” Trump said.

Nikki Haley, his Republican competitor, did not comment on the ruling, which is rocking the news cycle. Instead, she pulled something from the campaign file relating to girl power:

Haley also wrote on X/Twitter today: “Let’s get back to normal and back to the basics. Let’s talk about how we’re going to get our national debt under control and how we’re going to prevent war. This primary shouldn’t be about one man or one woman, it should be about our country.”

President Joe Biden, on his campaign page, also made no mention of the ruling. Neither did he make note of it on his official @POTUS page on X. Instead, his campaign team wrote about how he is going to take away Americans’ “assault weapons.” It was as if nothing had happened at the Supreme Court this morning.

Vivek Ramaswamy, a former presidential candidate who over the weekend filed an amicus brief to urging the justices to overturn Colorado’s “disastrous & unconstitutional” ruling to eliminate Trump from the state’s ballot, said on Monday, “Today’s 9-0 Supreme Court decision needn’t be something to celebrate, it’s something we ought to once again take for granted: we the people decide who governs. The fact that it took the highest Court in the land to say it shows how far we’ve fallen. But it’s a good start in the right direction.”

Alaskan Nick Begich, a Republican candidate for Congress and supporter of Trump, said, “The most liberal justices sided with the most conservative justices — without exception. The biggest thing to note is not that they ruled in trump’s favor but that they ruled 9-0 with the liberal and conservative wing agreeing on the Constitution’s clarity on this matter. However, the fact that you have to go to the Supreme Court to get justice today because the rest of the court system is so politicized, is what is so concerning.”

Although 24 attorneys general filed a letter with the Supreme Court asking the court to uphold the Constitution, that left 26 attorneys general who did not join in.

Commentator Keith Olbermann, hard left Democrat formerly with MSNBC, called for the dissolution of the Supreme Court to save democracy, adding, “The Supreme Court has betrayed democracy. Its members including Jackson, Kagan and Sotomayor have proved themselves inept at reading comprehension. And collectively the ‘court’ has shown itself to be corrupt and illegitimate. It must be dissolved.”

The Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, looking close to tears, posted a video saying, “Ultimately, it will be up to the American voters to save our democracy.” After trying to take away choice from the voters, she now hopes voters will do the right thing as she sees it.

Kelly Tshibaka, director for Trump’s campaign in Alaska, said, “SCOTUS delivered a landmark unanimous ruling protecting free & fair elections this morning. Neither @POTUS nor @NikkiHaley have commented. Do they NOT support the Constitution? NOT support elections by the People??”

Sen. Dan Sullivan posted this comment: “Today’s unanimous decision to strike down the Colorado court’s ruling to keep President Trump off the ballot is a victory for American democracy. The American people should decide who will lead our country—not four judges in Colorado. You don’t ‘preserve’ democracy by removing candidates from the ballot.”

Sen. Lisa Murkowski and Rep. Mary Peltola, both never-Trumpers were silent on the matter. Murkowski supports Haley and Peltola is on Team Biden.

Alaska Republicans will have a chance to choose between Haley and Trump on March 5 at the Presidential Preference Poll. Information on how to take part is below:

Thank you for supporting this Alaska news service!

Breaking: Supreme Court is unanimous — Trump can be on ballot in states trying to deny him

The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled in a 13-page decision that single states lack the authority to deny a presidential candidate access to the ballot due to allegations he engaged in rebellion or insurrection against the U.S.

The justices said the Constitution says that such a decision “rests with Congress and not the states.” The court also cautioned that if a patchwork of states developed, where some allowed a candidate on the ballot, but others did not, it could create chaos.

“Nothing in the Constitution requires that we endure such chaos – arriving at any time or different times, up to and perhaps beyond the inauguration,” the justices ruled.

“Because the Constitution makes Congress, rather than the States, responsible for enforcing Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment against federal officeholders and candidates, the Colorado Supreme Court erred in ordering former President Trump excluded from the 2024 Presidential primary ballot,” the ruling said.

“We conclude that States may disqualify persons holding or attempting to hold state office. But States have no power under the Constitution to enforce Section 3 with respect to federal offices, especially the Presidency,” the justices said.

The announcement comes one day before Super Tuesday, when 15 state and party-run primaries take place across the country.

Kelly Tshibaka, Alaska director for the Trump campaign, issued a statement: “America is a nation led by the People, not the ruling elite. Today’s decision is a victory for the Constitution and ‘We the People.’ Voters should decide who leads our country, not unelected bureaucrats or political adversaries to a candidate. This decision protects the rights of every American voter, which is why the vote was unanimous. This case is a landmark case for protecting free and fair elections.”

Although the ruling applies to Colorado, it also applies to other two other states with similar challenges to Trump’s candidacy.

The ruling itself can be read at this Supreme Court link.

This story is being updated. Check back, and thank you for supporting the work of Must Read Alaska.

Haley implies she’s no longer bound by promise to support eventual GOP nominee

Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley has evidently changed her mind. She indicated she no longer feels bound by her promise to support the eventual GOP nominee.

“No, I think I’ll make what decision I want to make, but that’s not something I’m thinking about,” she told Meet the Press‘ Kristen Welker, adding that “if you talk about an endorsement, you’re talking about a loss. I don’t think like that.”

Her remarks gave fuel to speculation that she is being considered by the No Labels Party for its nominee. The No Labels Party said it will make its decision about a nominee sometime after March 15. The party will be holding a private meeting on March 8 to decide whether to move forward with a third-party candidate.

Haley told reporters on Friday that she has not spoken to anyone about a separate bid with No Labels, saying the group would require her to have a Democrat as a running mate.

“I’m a Republican,” Haley to reporters, according to NBC News. “If I ran for No Labels, that would mean it’s about me. It’s not about me. It’s about the direction I think the country should go.”

Donald Trump on Saturday won the Republican caucuses in Michigan, Idaho, and Missouri. Between the three states, Trump won with nearly 98% support: 1,575 votes for Trump and 36 for Haley.

Haley won her first primary — Washington, D.C., where 19 delegates were up for grabs.

Trump now has 244 delegates, to Haley’s 24. On Tuesday, 15 states will decide and 1,225 delegates will be decided. By March 16, 1,415 delegate pledges will have been decided. By the end of March, more than 70% of delegates will be committed.

On Tuesday, Alaska Republicans will take part in a caucus-by-ballot event called the Presidential Preference Poll, which will determine the distribution of the 29 delegates the Alaska GOP will have to the national convention in Milwaukee, Wis., July 15-18.

Haley also said on the Sunday show that the RNC is “not the same RNC, now it’s Trump’s RNC.”

Downing: ADN comes unhinged over Dunleavy’s streamlining the state’s organization chart

Just when you think Alaska’s “paper of record” cannot get any more unhinged, twisted, and factually off, the Anchorage Daily News’ editorial page has had a “hold my beer moment.”

The most recent editorial, “Should any governor get to wield this much power?” took aim at Gov. Mike Dunleavy. In what can only be described as a convoluted list of grievances riddled with errors, the leaders of the Pulitzer Prize-winning publication went after Dunleavy for, this time, having the audacity to exercise his authority granted by the Alaska Constitution. 

Whaa? 

Alaska’s governor, unlike almost every other state, has limited authority to issue executive orders. While Gov. Ron DeSantis in Florida or President Joe Biden in Washington, D.C. can write out a dictate with the force of law in the form of an executive order, the Alaska Constitution allows that power for only one, specific, purpose: to organize the government’s departments. It is akin to the power to move an organizational chart around in the company. 

The constitution in Alaska is pretty clear: A governor can only introduce executive orders at the beginning of a legislative session and only for the chair-arranging purposes earlier described. From there, the order would have the force of law if lawmakers did not sit in a joint session and cancel them out within sixty days. 

Dunleavy is in a streamlining mood. There are dozens of boards and commissions that regulate tens of thousands of Alaskans. The past four years during the Covid lockdowns showed how hard it was for people to get their professional licenses. Are you a nurse? Wait for months to get approval. There is a good reason to make sure some people are properly regulated. We don’t need doctors with spotty records operating on our family members.

But do we need the same vetting for doctors, lawyers, and engineers as we do for … barbers? How about massage therapists? Dunleavy thought it was ridiculous, and issued executive orders that  proposed eliminating a board of people who would have long wait times to approve licenses and leave it with professionals at the Department of Commerce (you know, the agency responsible for making sure we have jobs and not a black market). There were also some advisory councils to certain state parks that have outlived their usefulness (A for effort, but still advisory), and executive orders were issued to get rid of those. 

The way the ADN is writing it, however, there is an assault on the institutions of this wonderful state at work.

The Legislature is often the villain, as far as the press is concerned, but in this instance is the newspaper’s champion. Legislators must charge forward “cry havoc, and let slip the dogs of war,” to quote Wiliam Shakespeare. In this case, it’s the dogs of politics. 

Where to begin: With the fact that the editorial board could use a fact-checking editor? Time and again, the editorial referred to the executive orders as “administrative orders,” a completely different action that does not have the force of law. Fair enough, everyone makes mistakes, including this author.

But then the editorial really lets the mask drop, suggesting that what should happen is fiddling with the Permanent Fund Corporation’s Board of Directors. Among the changes: Why not make Trustees confirmable by the Legislature?

There may be some logic, except for one pesky thing: That would be blatantly unconstitutional, and a quick reading of the state’s rule book would have helped prevent ADN’s holier-than-thou screed. Article III, Section 26, limits who the governor appoints that must be confirmed by the Legislature; the CliffNotes say it is limited to commissioners of departments and members of regulatory or quasi-judicial agencies. 

That makes sense. The Regulatory Commission of Alaska, which sets rates for everything from trash to the landline phones, is a regulator; the Workers Compensation Board decided disputes between workers and employers; the folks sitting in those positions need to be vetted and confirmed. 

There was an attempt to make other agencies that manage “significant state assets” confirmable in a ballot initiative over 20 years ago. It failed, and it did not even include the Permanent Fund in the question. 

Why does this matter? Aside from the fact that a little bit of superficial research embarrasses the homily given by the institution that purports to report on facts and verified analysis, it reveal the depth of the animus for the governor by the press and is part of the environment in Juneau.

Despite being the first governor re-elected in a generation and only the second Republican to be returned to the Third Floor of the Alaska Capitol, the press cannot fathom that the public actually support what Gov. Dunleavy is putting out. And the ADN’s remedy to this, to get the Legislature involved, contradicts their earlier cries of the heart about nothing being done in the session on anything meaningful. 

The one constant of the past 10 years has been the unwillingness of the Legislature to make bold calls when the chips are down. Instead, the state’s savings have dwindled, a dividend is set every year in a stockyard auction manner, and meaningful reforms on education, labor, business, and resource development are strangled in committees run by special interests. 

And this is the cavalry the ADN is calling on. No wonder trust in traditional media keeps sinking.

Suzanne Downing is editor of Must Read Alaska.

Electric car in winter? Pro tip: Keep your parka close

Tow truck operators in Alaska might have a word of advice for those driving electric cars in Alaska’s wintertime: Don’t put your winter gear in the front luggage compartment, also known as a “frunk.” You could freeze to death.

Scott Hockema, owner of Scott’s Towing & Hauling in Soldotna, came across a Tesla full of young adults shivering in the late night cold, wearing only their t-shirts. Their Tesla was inoperable along the shoulder near Kasilof, on the Kenai Peninsula, and, in frigid nighttime temperatures, they could not get the frunk to open. The insurance company told them they’d send a truck in the morning. So they called Scott’s Towing, one of the few tow truck operators who work nights in the area.

Hockema was able to get the passengers warm, and then lifted and hauled the car to a charging station in Soldotna. But there, the group found that the car was so dead that when they plugged in the 4-foot charging cord, the vehicle wouldn’t charge.

That’s when the towing challenge went from slightly out-of-the-ordinary to pro. The vehicle had been towed so many times the towing hook was broken. It was hard to get close with the tow truck. And a tow operator just can’t jack up an electric car from anywhere.

“You have to use a jump box on two small wires in the bumper to open the hood to jump to the 12-volt battery to get the big batteries to start charging. But the electric actuators were not working, so the hood wouldn’t open.” The actuators were frozen.

The Tesla was inoperable until the owner could get a technician from Anchorage to get the hood open and jump the 12-volt battery.

Hockema said that the incident was a reminder that electric cars’ batteries are not only drained by cold weather, but also by the amount of weight in the car — in this case four people and luggage, which can make battery life unpredictable. Having to heat the cabin of the vehicle also drains the battery. He pointed out that electric vehicles don’t come with spare tires, as manufacturers try to keep costs down. And since most everything can be run off of an app on a smart phone, you don’t want your phone battery to die as you wait by the side of the road in the middle of an Alaska winter. This group of Alaskans, who were heading to Anchorage over the pass with a winter advisory calling for 8-12” of snow, were actually lucky they broke down in Kasilof.

With more automobile owners turning to electric cars in Alaska, Hockema noted that tow operators are having to come up with new ways to “McGyver” them out of the ditch and on a flatbed for towing; electric cars cannot be towed without a flatbed.

Hockema said he’s not trying to bash EV owners, but wants them to be aware of what to expect in the harsh Alaska winters.

Where does Sen. Lyman Hoffman really live — Bethel or Anchorage? Quinhagak voter wants to know the truth

On any given weekend all year long, Sen. Lyman Hoffman can be seen filling up his cart at the Dimond Blvd Costco in Anchorage. He is known to spend most of his time in Anchorage, even though he represents Senate District S, the Bethel-to-Adak area. That is something that has irked fur trapper Willie Keppel of Quinhagak. Keppel has lived in rural Alaska for over 40 years and is often heard on KRUP radio out of Dillingham, and KEDI radio out of Bethel during the morning talk show hosted by Stevie Ray.

Keppel wants to start a recall petition to get rid of the Hoffman reign in Western Alaska. However, he has a challenge on his hands: Senate Seat S is huge, with a coastline that stretches from the Yukon River to the tip of the Aleutian island and back to the western part of Cook Inlet. And Keppel lives in a remote town of 776 people south of Bethel.

“Lyman Hoffman has been misrepresenting his residency for years. The Division of Elections didn’t do due diligence when we requested he be removed from the ballot in 2022,” Keppel said. But with a new Division of Elections direction, Keppel is hoping he can get access to his cell phone location records, credit card spending location, and Alaska Airlines mileage records.

The letter that Keppel received from the Division of Elections in 2022:

Keppel says that the U.S. Census uses “intent” as a qualifying factor.

“We’re calling malarkey,” Keppel said. He pointed out that for Anchorage homeless people, the Census rules that their residence is “where they lay their heads, most commonly.”

Hoffman, Keppel has reminded radio listeners often, lays his head on a pillow in a home on Snowline Drive on the Anchorage hillside. He also has a place in Bethel. He says Hoffman only uses his Bethel house as a fish camp.

“Lyman never shows up until the king salmon shows up in June,” Keppel said.

“We’re intent on having the final say in Senate S, as the Legislature refuses to tighten up the rules and force legislators to live in their district, and worse yet, the Division of Elections has fully embraced the ‘if you lie, we sure ain’t checking’ policy for incumbents,” Keppel said.

“You would never get away with living in Sand Lake and running for a seat out in the Valley,” Keppel said.

Keppel, if he goes ahead with his recall efforts, would need 744 signatures from the district.

“So if you are living in-between the Yukon River and the tip of the Aleutian Islands, are a registered voter of Senate District S, we’re asking interested parties to DM me if you would like to be part of a recall Lyman Hoffman committee. Or, email me at [email protected]. The corruption has to end,” Keppel said on social media.

U.S. government funnels taxpayer funds to an organization filled with Hamas terrorists

By ADAM ANDRZEJEWSKI | REALCLEARWIRE

Topline: The U.S. government has given $1.2 billion to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency since April 2021, according to a report from OpenTheBooks.com.

UNRWA exists to provide humanitarian support for Palestinian refugees. But 10% of the agency’s employees are believed to have connections to the terrorist group Hamas, according to a recent Wall Street Journal report.

At least 12 employees were directly involved in the Oct. 7 attacks against Israel, including one teacher who allegedly kept a hostage in his attic for 50 days.

Key facts: U.S. taxpayers have spent over $8 billion to help Palestinian refugees since 1950, OpenTheBooks found.

The U.S. has provided almost one-third of UNRWA’s total funding, more than any other country. President Barack Obama’s administration spent more than any other president, with annual payments reaching nearly $400 million.

Former President Donald Trump cut all aid to UNRWA for the first time in 71 years because of concerns it could support Hamas and the Palestinian Liberation Organization, which used funds to support the families of dead terrorists.

President Joe Biden restarted U.S. support in 2021 and spent over $300 million each year. Biden said at the time that providing balanced support to both Israel and Palestine was the best way to work toward a two-state solution.

But concerns were expressed as early as 2014 that UNRWA was “effectively a branch of Hamas.”

Even after Oct. 7, the Biden administration sent another $121 million in Palestinian aid to UNRWA. Funding did not stop until this January.

A Biden-backed bill moving through Congress would redirect UNRWA funding toward other humanitarian groups in Gaza.

Critical quote: Ethan Mayer-Rich of the Arab Center Washington D.C. opposed the U.S.’s recent decision to pause UNRWA funding.

“We’re seeing a pretty quick departure from what used to be a split down party lines,” he said. “It’s reckless, and ultimately I think history is going to see [the U.S.] as being completely complicit in what is unquestionably an incredibly tragic and dire situation.”

Supporting quote: Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) wants the U.S. to permanently end UNRWA funding, not just temporarily pause it.

“Weapons have been found in UNRWA schools. Hamas tunnels have been found adjacent to UNRWA facilities. Hamas has stolen $1 million in UNRWA supplies since October 7, while UNRWA facilities may have been used to hold hostages,” Issa said in a letter obtained by the New York Post. “UNRWA has also faced longstanding criticism over its educational programing which indoctrinates Palestinian youth in antisemitism and terror.”

Summary: Concerns have long existed that the $1.2 billion the U.S. sent to UNRWA since 2021 could be used to fund terrorist activities. Tragically, those concerns appear to have been borne out.

The #WasteOfTheDay is a project of forensic auditors at OpenTheBooks.com

This article was originally published by RealClearInvestigations and made available via RealClearWire.

Larry Behrens: The Pocketing Podestas influenced Biden’s LNG embargo. Congress must investigate.

By LARRY BEHRENS | POWER THE FUTURE

Ever since 2016, talk to a liberal and there’s a good chance that they will blame “Russia” for something.

Election interference, inflation, record-high gas prices, the list goes on and on. Since taking office, Joe Biden continues to take this deflection to a new level. As a gallon of gas soared past $5 in the summer of 2022 it was all Russia’s fault. And who can forget the ill-fated #PutinsPriceHike campaign as Team Biden tried to dodge criticism for skyrocketing inflation.

Yet according to recent revelations, there may be more to Biden’s “America Last” energy policy than meets the eye, and again, Russia enters the picture.

According to a bombshell report from the Washington Free Beacon, the decision to halt American liquified natural gas (LNG) exports was pushed by Biden’s new Climate Czar John Podesta, who recently took over for John Kerry.

As a well-known climate warrior, it makes sense Podesta would be pushing for policies against American energy interests. Yet at the same time, Podesta’s brother, Tony, one of DC’s most well-connected mega lobbyists, has financial connections to foreign LNG companies, including one with links to a Russian oligarch.

It is concerning to see the Podesta family standing to profit from a policy priority of the White House who employs another Podesta. Foreign companies, including Russia, are clear beneficiaries Biden’s LNG attack. It should be raising questions about potential conflicts of interest and profit motives at the White House.

Even more troubling is the fact that this decision plays right into the hands of Vladimir Putin, the same dictator that Biden and his allies have been quick to blame for our country’s woes. By halting American LNG exports, Biden is handing Putin a wider energy market, allowing him to continue raking in billions while American energy workers suffer, and our families pay higher prices.

As even the left-leaning Washington Post editorial board put it, “Biden’s LNG decision is a win for political symbolism, not the climate.”

For the record, this is not the first time the Podestas were caught in ethical compromising situation. In 2019, Tony Podesta was investigated by the Southern District of New York for potential violations of foreign lobbying rules. Back in 2021, the same Podesta brother pocketed a cool $1 million by lobbying Biden in favor of Chinese telecommunications. Instead of tapping the brakes on this questionable influence, Joe Biden picked John Podesta to replace John Kerry and then put him in charge of the largest green slush fund in American history.

At a time when the country is still facing too-high gas prices and inflation, it is unacceptable for the Biden administration to prioritize the interests of foreign companies, and his radical green supporters over those of American workers and consumers. It is imperative that Congress launch an investigation into these suspicious ties to uncover the truth behind Biden’s energy policy and determine whether there is any real Russian collusion at play.

The House of Representatives deserves credit for investigating other elements of Biden’s green grift, including an electric vehicle battery deal that Ford reached with a Chinese company. It seems there is no end to the amount of our money Team Biden is willing to spend for more…green.

It is time for Biden to put America first and prioritize the needs of the American people over the profits of foreign entities.

It is time for Congress to step up and ensure that our energy policies are in the best interests of the country, not those of foreign oligarchs. The time for action is now. Let us demand the truth and hold our leaders accountable for their actions. Congress must investigate because America deserves nothing less.

Larry Behrens is the Communications Director for Power The Future. He has appeared on Fox News, OANN and NewsMax speaking in defense of American energy workers. He is the author of the book “Sabotage: How Joe Biden Surrendered American Energy Independence.” This column was originally published by RealClearEnergy and made available via RealClearWire.