Friday, August 7, 2026
Home Blog Page 418

Take this survey from an Anchorage Assembly that can’t take a message from public on Portland Loos

The Anchorage Assembly has launched an online survey, open until July 12, to find out what the public thinks about the need for more public restrooms in Anchorage.

In April, the public soundly defeated the Assembly’s bond proposal to install a series of Portland Loo public restrooms around Anchorage.

Prop. 8, for $5 million in taxpayer funds, would have put up to 10 modular toilet facilities around town. The voters said $500,000 toilets were too much. Voters appear to be concerned that the toilets will be taken over by vagrants and drug abusers, as so many other public facilities have been.

But this is an Assembly that won’t take “no” for an answer.

“We want to learn more why the bond did not pass. Did the bond ask for too much money, did it not provide enough information, or are restrooms simply not a desired amenity in public spaces?” the Assembly asks on its survey website at this link.

The website set up to push the survey gives all kinds of reasons that more public restrooms are needed, including “mental well-being.”

The survey website says people benefit from clean restrooms, stating “Parents of young children can leave home knowing they’ll be able to find a clean bathroom before a request becomes an emergency.”

On the same page, however, the survey website admits that businesses endure costs for “repairing damage from misuse” of their toilets, without acknowledging the same problem will plague unattended public toilets at even greater frequency.

Among the questions on the survey is this: What is your gender identity?

The choices provided by the survey are:

  • – Woman
  • – Man
  • – Gender queer or non-binary
  • – Agender
  • – Not specified above, please specify

In a study conducted in 2019 with cities that installed Portland Loos, some of serious problems with these facilities were described. These problems, including needle use, prostitution, and general illegal activity, are not included as information the public might want as it visits the Anchorage Assembly’s public survey. The problems include these Portland Loo stories from other cities:

In 2014 the Salt Lake City government, at the behest of members of the Salt Lake City community concerned about health conditions and lack of services in a dilapidated industrial area of the city, installed two Portland Loos. The Loos are close to a homeless shelter, a soup kitchen, and a health clinic for people experiencing homelessness. While there are plans to build multi-use facilities, there are at present no residential areas nearby and very few businesses. No sooner were the Loos installed than drug dealers took them over, prohibiting entry to anyone not willing to buy drugs. The Loos also began to be used for prostitution. Toilets were constantly clogged with inappropriate items being flushed down. People were sleeping in the Loos. In 2018 the Utah Highway Patrol ordered that the Portland Loos be shut at night. There is now a full time monitor during the day assigned to clean the Loos as needed and limit use to one person at a time. Since then conditions have improved.

In 2017 Olympia Washington, responding to a call from the community for a restroom for the public, especially people experiencing homelessness, installed a Portland Loo open 24/7 along a sidewalk downtown with heavy foot traffic, and taverns and restaurants, specialty stores, and City Hall nearby. Concurrent with its being installed an adjacent parking lot was converted into a park which was eventually closed down. Before being closed down, the Loo became a congregating area for people using the park (homeless individuals, drug users) to the detriment of the use of the Loo. Since the park was closed down, the situation has improved significantly. There are reports of occasional use for shooting up and people sleeping in them at night.

Peninsula Clarion cuts print to one day per week

The final Wednesday edition of Kenai’s Peninsula Clarion will be printed and delivered on Wednesday, June 26, after the parent company, Alabama-based Carpenter Media, decided to trim from two days a week to just one. The newspaper, as so many are, is slowly become an online publication.

“We will publish our last Saturday paper July 6 and deliver readers a weekly paper every Friday following,” the newspaper announced Friday.

One year ago, the Peninsula Clarion and Juneau Empire went from five days week down to two days for their print editions, and, along with Homer News, took the printing work to a firm outside the state.

At the same time, Carpenter Media Group, which acquired Sound Publishing earlier this year, announced it is laying off 62 people in the Northwest, including half of the unionized employees at the Everett Herald. Carpenter owns more than 40 newspapers in Washington and about 200 publications altogether.

Neither the Homer News nor the Juneau Empire have announced similar moves to reducing the print edition. The Empire prints twice a week and Homer prints once.

Passing: Susan Stone, longtime teacher, civic volunteer in Ketchikan, active in Republican circles

A well-known Republican and civic activist in Ketchikan has passed.

Susan Stone, who was for a several years the president of the Ketchikan District Republicans, died on Saturday after a long battle with cancer.

She will not be forgotten: The first order of business at the Republican State Central Committee quarterly meeting in the Mat-Su Valley on Saturday was a solemn resolution honoring her service.

Stone was a longtime and well-regarded teacher in Ketchikan. Just this week, the Ketchikan Chamber of Commerce named her the Grand Marshal for this year’s Fourth of July parade. The chamber wrote about her in its announcement:

“Susan Stone will lead the procession, symbolizing unity, celebration, and the vibrant spirit of Ketchikan,” the chamber wrote, although the group was certainly aware that Stone was on her deathbed and would not likely make it to July 4, much less to the parade.

“We are delighted to have Susan Stone as our Grand Marshal for this year’s Fourth of July Parade,” wrote Trevor Shaw, president of the Greater Ketchikan Chamber of Commerce and a close friend of Stone’s. “Her dedication to the community aligns perfectly with the theme of our event. After decades of influencing our youth and community, we are proud to salute her.”

Stone recently retired after teaching in the Ketchikan school district for 27 years, primarily teaching U.S. history, civics, and American government. She was the commencement speaker for the Class of 2024.

“Through her teaching she has worked to instill pride and love for this great country in all her students. She has strived to not only teach them key facts, dates, and milestones, but also to help history come to life and help them become good citizens as they come of age. She has done this by not just teaching them the Bill of Rights and significant Supreme Court cases, but by bringing their government to them,” the Chamber wrote.

“She developed a mock trial program that included a field trip to the courthouse for every senior class for over a decade. She spearheaded the police ride-along program for American Government students. She connected the students to their legislators, including Rep. Don Young, U.S. Senators Stevens, Murkowski, and Sullivan, Lt. Gov. Mead Treadwell, and many other local officials. When her senior students turn 18 she assists them in getting registered to vote. She works to help them see that the government is accessible and that each of them can make a difference. For nearly three decades she has brought our history and government to life for her students in real and practical ways,” the Chamber continued.

Stone even built a World War I-style trench through the middle of her classroom.

Stone took time off from teaching to raise a family, and during that time was a Girl Scout leader, and Girl Scout Council president. Through her work with the Girl Scouts, she empowered young women to be active, engaged citizens from a very young age. She volunteered in many other youth activities, church activities, and community activities of all sorts.

“If you ask her why she did all these things she would say that it was to keep our community going and make it a better place for her daughters and all of the kids in it. Her energy has always been focused on modeling behavior for the generations to come, to help mold active, engaged citizens,” the Chamber said.

Stone’s students have gone on to serve in local elected office; to be doctors, attorneys, businesspeople, teachers, caregivers. Look around this community, and beyond, “and you will find Mrs. Stone’s former students active and engaged in making their communities better, just as she has worked to do for so many decades. She has poured her heart and soul into her teaching each and every day of her career, including many late nights, weekends, and summers. And for the past few years she has done all of that while fighting a mighty battle against cancer. On top of teaching them to be good citizens, she has taught her students something about what it means to be a warrior, too.”

“Literally thousands of Ketchikan’s graduates know what it means to salute and respect our country because of what they learned in Mrs. Stone’s classroom. What better way to recognize this year’s theme of ‘Ketchikan, We Salute You’ than to honor a member of our community who has fostered a love and honor for our community and our country in generations of young people,” the Chamber wrote.

She was born Susan Bullock and lived in Kodiak as a nine-year-old girl with her parents Evelyn and the Rev. Don Bullock when the 1964 earthquake hit. Stone is the mother of Stacey Stone, who has served as legal counsel for the Alaska Republican Party for many years, and two other grown children.

Judge upholds historic fines against signature-gathering group opposing ranked choice voting

Anchorage Superior Court Judge Laura Hartz, appointed by Gov. Mike Dunleavy, has allowed to stand the campaign violation fines levied in January by the Alaska Public Offices Commission against the group challenging Alaska’s ranked choice voting system.

The repeal of ranked choice voting will be on November’s general election ballot.

The Alaskans for Honest Elections was successful in getting enough signatures to get the question on the ballot in November, giving Alaska voters another chance to consider whether they want to use ranked choice voting and nonpartisan primaries as their method to elect people to state and federal offices. But their handling of their campaign finances was lacking and exposed them to a complaint with Alaska Public Offices Commission.

The dark-money group Alaskans for Better Elections, which created the final-four primary and ranked choice voting general, had originally filed that complaint, saying that Alaskans for Honest Elections, Phil Izon, Art Mathias, and Wellsprings Fellowship violated campaign finance laws by not accurately reporting the pathway of a major donation to the group’s signature-gathering effort.

After the complaint was filed, APOC reviewed the facts and issued one of the largest penalties in APOC memory: $94,610.20.

The fine can be compared to a 2021 fine that APOC levied against the campaign of Mayor Dave Bronson, who was fined $38,500 by the regulatory agency.

In 2020, APOC fined Rep. Lance Pruitt over $1 million, but then reduced it by 99% and ultimately fined him $10,222.

In 2014, Rep. Chris Tuck was fined $14,000 for campaign reporting errors.

But for Alaskans for Honest Elections, which wants to repeal 2020’s Ballot Measure 2, APOC determined that the full court press was appropriate. Mathias contributed $90,000 to the Ranked Choice Education Association, which then gave the money to Alaskans for Honest Elections. The source of the original funds was not clear to the public.

Judge Hartz wrote, “There is no constitutional right to make anonymous contributions for the purpose of influencing the outcome of an election. There is likewise no right to contribute through an intermediary or in the name of another, and the court declines to create such a right.”

Hartz also wrote that the Alaskans for Honest Elections claim that “true source reporting does not apply to ballot initiatives misreads the admittedly confusing but ultimately plain language of .065(c) and ignores the broader statutory framework referenced in the statute. Appellants’ reading of the statute renders meaningless multiple subsections of AS 15.13.040 and 2 AAC 50.352 in full. Courts ‘generally disfavor statutory constructions that reach absurd results.'”

The judged concluded that Alaska’s true source reporting statute and related provisions are narrowly tailored to the government’s “substantial interest” in having an informed electorate by making publicly available to voters the true source of election funds.

“Courts have recognized that knowing the sources of election spending ultimately informs voters’ decisions, prevents groups from ‘hiding behind dubious and misleading names’ and likewise prevents individuals from hiding in anonymity. The Alaska Supreme Court has likewise held that ‘[w]hen citizens vote on the basis of misinformation, or a lack of relevant information, the decision-making process on which our government ultimately rests suffers.'”

Alaskans for Better Elections asked the judge to impose triple damages on Alaskans for Honest Elections, but was denied.

The full judgment can be read here:


Now there are three: Kenai Republican women endorse Nick Begich for Congress

Three clubs in three days. The Kenai Peninsula Republican Women have passed a resolution similar to one passed by the Republican Women of Fairbanks and the Valley Republican Women of Alaska, giving their full endorsement to both Donald Trump for president and Nick Begich for Congress. The group held a fundraiser for Nick Begich in the fall, and their support hasn’t wavered.

The resolutions from the women’s clubs are a direct response to the endorsement made by Trump for Nancy Dahlstrom, who filled to run for Congress in November, a half a year after Begich was already in the race. Both are Republicans.

The Kenai resolution is as follows:

WHEREAS, the trust and confidence of the citizens in their elected representatives are paramount to a functioning and healthy republic; and

WHEREAS, every congressional candidate has a duty to maintain the highest standards of integrity, transparency, and accountability in all pursuits; and

WHEREAS, responsiveness, accessibility and concerns of the citizens are actively engaged and heeded through representation of their voices at the grass roots level ensuring actions reflect the values and best interest of the constituents they serve; and

WHEREAS, Kenai Peninsula Republican Women (KPRW) completely recognizes and supports President Donald J. Trump for the 2024 Presidential election. We are a party rooted in grassroots activism, deriving support from the dedicated Republican base, the very heart of our party, and

WHEREAS, considering the party’s commitment to unity as a cornerstone of our success, we strongly believe in leading by example, for the benefit of our members.

WHEREAS, candidate Nick Begich has passionately campaigned, reaching out to all areas and demographics of Alaskan voters since July 2023, lead by prayer and support by many grassroots republicans exhibiting and placing America First Values and Make America Great Again solutions for Alaska’s future; and

THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: In pursuit of respect and dignity, Nick Begich has run a positive, solutions-oriented campaign focused on the future of our State, advancing a cohesive and thriving Alaska.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: Kenai Peninsula Republican Women, established in 2001, stands with Nick Begich for Alaska in his bid for U.S. Congress. We wholeheartedly endorse and support Nick, while praying for our nation’s unity, which we advocate. Nick Begich is the ideal choice for Alaska at this critical juncture.

Sen. Joni Ernst takes on Eco Health Alliance — again

By LINDA BOYLE

Readers may remember Rep. Dr. Rich McCormick, the Georgia Republican who served on the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, when he stated “EcoHealth [Alliance] violated the terms of its NIH grant when it failed to produce laboratory notebooks with data about the WIV’s gain-of-function research.”  

And who was the person behind all that gain-of-function research?  That was Dr. Peter Daszak through National Institute of Health funding that was authorized by none other than Dr. Anthony Fauci, the former director of National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and one of the core creators of Covid-19 policies in the Trump and Biden Administrations.

Here were the key takeaways from the hearing with Dr. Fauci, according to the House Oversight Committee’s own summary:

  • Dr. Fauci showed no remorse for the millions of lives affected by his divisive rhetoric and his unscientific policies. He did not apologize to the thousands of Americans who lost their jobs because they refused the novel vaccine, nor did he apologize to children experiencing severe leaning loss as a result of actions he promoted.
  • Dr. Fauci confirmed that his Senior Advisor — Dr. David Morens — violated official NIH policies and potentially broke federal law. Evidence obtained by the Select Subcommittee suggests that Dr. Morens deliberately obstructed the Select Subcommittee’s investigation into the origins of COVID-19, unlawfully deleted federal COVID-19 records, and shared nonpublic information about National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant processes with his “best-friend” EcoHealth Alliance, Inc. (EcoHealth) President Dr. Peter Daszak.
  • Dr. Fauci maintained his misleading claim that the NIH never funded gain-of-function research in Wuhan, China. In 2021, he told Sen. Rand Paul that “the NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” During yesterday’s hearing, Dr. Fauci doubled down on his previous claim by stating “the NIH did not fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology.” Notably, former Acting NIH Director Dr. Lawrence Tabak told the Select Subcommittee recently that the NIH did, in fact, fund gain-of-function research in Wuhan.
  • Dr. Fauci agreed with the Select Subcommittee that EcoHealth and its president, Dr. Peter Daszak, should never again receive a single cent from the U.S. taxpayer. Two weeks after the Select Subcommittee released evidence of EcoHealth’s contempt for the American people, its flagrant disregard for the risks associated with gain-of-function research, and its willful violation of the terms of its NIH grant, the Department of Health and Human Services commenced formal debarment proceedings against the organization and its president.
  • Dr. Fauci corrected his previous testimony that his staff did not possess conflicts of interest. During his transcribed interview he claimed, “the only people that I am involved with is my own staff, who we’ve mentioned many times in this discussion, who don’t have a conflict of interest.” During yesterday’s hearing, he changed his tune testifying that Dr. Morens “definitely had a conflict of interest.”
  • Dr. Fauci publicly acknowledged that the lab leak hypothesis was possible and not a conspiracy theory. Yesterday, he told Rep. Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) that he falsely claimed that he has kept an “open mind” about the origins of the pandemic. This comes nearly four years after prompting the publication of the now infamous “Proximal Origin” paper that attempted to vilify and disprove the lab leak hypothesis.

Somebody in Congress was evidently listening when the testimony to the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic occurred.   

Sen. Joni Ernst, a Republican from Iowa, was listening. The Senate Armed Services Committee has unanimously passed her amendment to the 2025 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) “to close all potential pathways for EcoHealth Alliance to receive further federal defense funding.”  

Ernst added this to the National Defense Authorization Act after National Institutes of Health Principal Deputy Director Lawrence Tabak half-admitted that EcoHealth Alliance did indeed conduct gain-of-function research with our money, but it was “generic.”  

Dr. Bryce Nickels, a professor of genetics at Rutgers University and co-founder of the pandemic oversight group “Biosafety Now,” told the Washington Post, “Tabak was engaging in the usual obfuscation and semantic manipulation that is so frustrating and pointless.”

These experiments at Wuhan Virology Institute produced much more infectious variants than what could occur naturally if bats had transmitted the Covid-19 virus, some virologists say. 

The Senate Armed Services Committee unanimously passed Sen. Ernst’s amendment. That speaks volumes.  

While the Department of Health and Human Services in May suspended federal funding to EcoHealth Alliance and started debarment proceedings that would ban this group and Dr. Daszak from receiving funding for three years, Ernst’s amendment takes the ban a step further: If passed, it will not only ban EcoHealth Alliance but any subsidiary of the disgraced group from future defense funding.

“Defense dollars should be spent protecting our country, not paying for more of EcoHealth’s batty experiments,” Ernst told the Washington Free Beacon. “This shady organization has managed to avoid accountability time and time again. My amendment slams the door shut on any possibility for deep state bureaucrats to find another roundabout way to restore funding for the group’s risky research.”

If this Senate NDAA ban is successful, EcoHealth Alliance’s bottom line could be severely affected. EcoHealth Alliance heavily depends on federal funds, receiving more than $94 million in taxpayer dollars since 2008. This same group gave $600,000 of that funding to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for experiments on viruses that looked a lot like the ones that caused Covid-19. 

Before I get too excited and do a victory lap, I am aware of EcoHealth Alliance’s ability to weasel out of federal funding bans.  President Donald Trump suspended the group’s research funds in 2020. President Joe Biden reversed that funding ban in 2023, but suddenly banned them again in May. EcoHealth Alliance is working its K Street magic to get off the ‘banned” list. 

Senator Ernst tried a similar resolution in an 2024 version of the NDAA bill that made it through both the House and the Senate. But it didn’t make it into the final version—it was a last minute decision behind closed doors to remove it. 

It’s unknown if this 2025 amendment will meet the same demise. Yet I am hopeful.After Tabak testified, Congress and President Biden seem unified in their opposition.   

We are one step closer to solving the issues surrounding Covid and how it came to be a disease created that killed over 6 million people worldwide, including one million Americans. But there is much more work that needs to be done. There are bureaucrats who need to be held accountable for the harm done.  

And time will tell if America has the political will to hold all accountable for this horrible travesty.

Linda Boyle, RN, MSN, DM, was formerly the chief nurse for the 3rd Medical Group, JBER, and was the interim director of the Alaska VA. Most recently, she served as Director for Central Alabama VA Healthcare System. She is the director of the Alaska Covid Alliance.

Supreme Court rules that a non-citizen gang spouse doesn’t have automatic right to admission to USA

A U.S. citizen does not have a fundamental liberty interest in her noncitizen spouse being admitted to the country, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Friday. Especially if that spouse is associated with a deadly gang and is reasonably thought to intend to break the law in the United States.

In Department of State v. Munoz, the justices were asked if Sandra Munoz, a U.S. citizen in Los Angeles, could invoke a “fundamental right of marriage.” The State Department does not deny that Muñoz (who is already married) has that fundamental right, but Munoz further claimed the right to reside with her noncitizen spouse in the United States — a man whom officials believe belongs to an international criminal gang.

Munoz is described as a prominent civil rights attorney in Los Angeles. Her husband, Luis Asensio-Cordero, is El Salvadoran, and during his interview with the consulate, officials conducted a body search and found tattoos indicating he is a member of the MS-13 gang. They denied him a green card.

“After conducting several interviews with Asencio-Cordero, a consular officer denied his application, citing §1182(a)(3)(A)(ii), a provision that renders inadmissible a noncitizen whom the officer ‘knows, or has reasonable ground to believe, seeks to enter the United States to engage solely, principally, or incidentally in’ certain specified offenses or ‘any other unlawful activity,’” the decision explained. Asencio-Cordero guessed that he was denied a visa based on a finding that he was a member of MS–13, a transnational criminal gang.

El Salvador is known to be infested with criminal gangs, with many members committing crimes in the United States.

Although Asencio-Cordero disavowed any gang membership and he and Muñoz pressed the consulate to reconsider the officer’s finding, the ruling stood, so they appealed to the Department of State, which agreed with the consulate’s determination. Asencio-Cordero and Muñoz then sued the Department of State and others (collectively, State Department), claiming that it had abridged Muñoz’s constitutional liberty interest in her husband’s visa application by failing to give a sufficient reason why Asencio-Cordero is inadmissible under the “unlawful activity” bar. The Department of State said it is not required to give a reason. The District Court granted summary judgment to the State Department, but the Ninth Circuit vacated the judgment, holding that Muñoz had a constitutionally protected liberty interest in her husband’s visa application.

The Supreme Court has overturned that ruling in an opinion written by Justice Amy Coney Barrett.

The 6-3 vote was opposed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Jackson, the Democrat-appointed liberal women of the court who interpret then Constitution as granting the right to marry a gang member who is a non-citizen and then move that person to the United States to engaged in felonies.

Read the opinion at this Supreme Court link.

Robert Seitz: Time to fight the assault on energy

By ROBERT SEITZ

In my column in Must Read Alaska, on May 31, I shared my review of temperature data from that claims that Alaska is warming two- to four-times faster than the rest of the planet. In that column I described how I found there is not a problem of increased warming but a lack of extreme cold.

Then in my June 7 column I shared information about the history of Glacier Bay and a paper that shows that CO2 and other greenhouse gas molecules cannot have much effect even with a doubling of the current concentration in the atmosphere. 

If Alaska is not really warming at a high rate, we can take time to make some assessments on what we really need to work on that is most affected by the slight warming we have had.  

The outcome of research reported in “Infrared Forcing by Greenhouse Gases” by W. A. van Wijngaarden and W. Happer demonstrates there cannot have been and cannot be any great warming as the result of greenhouse gas emissions from the burning of hydrocarbon fuels. So it is time to resist, to fight against the global efforts to alter our energy makeup and focus on cheap energy and the economy.  

It is time to consider that our warming has just been a recovery from the Little Ice Age and normal variability of weather.  

In Alaska, there is no reason to stop our efforts to use renewable and alternate energy sources, as much of Alaska is remote, and does not have hydrocarbon fuels nearby, so can benefit greatly from the development of wind, solar and hydroelectric power.  

We should not be forced, however, to prematurely abandon the energy sources which will provide Alaska with a viable economy and ability for citizens of Alaska to survive the cold winters with a sustainable energy source for the Railbelt, natural gas, coal and crude oil.  We can still welcome whatever other energy sources that can provide cheap energy to all our communities and industries throughout Alaska.

It is time ensure the science used to provide guidance for U.S. and state policies is real science and not the political science pushed by the IPCC and other global organizations. For too long any research aimed against greenhouse gas warming has been denied funding or a part of any discussion. Those scientists and engineers with opposing ideas are speaking out and publishing and should now be assured a place at the energy table at our Universities and government policy groups.

The basis for this “PETITION TO COMPLETE A SUPPLEMENTAL ENVRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE TRANS-ALASKA PIPELINE SYSTEM & PLAN FOR DISMANTLEMENT, REMOVAL, & RESTORATION” is the misguided concern about warming from greenhouse gas emissions from burning of fossil (hydrocarbon) fuels.  

Since Alaska isn’t warming at the high rate claimed by the USDA compared to average annual temperatures in past records, it is time to provide a more scientific analysis of Alaska data by unbiased researchers so we can determine what conditions we have to deal with and direct our efforts to what is important.  

If we start with what we know about the impact of the Little Ice Age and assume the sun provided the energy to warm the planet back from the extreme low temperature experienced 300 years ago, we should end up with a better understanding of our environmental status.

I have also found that the same comparison of average annual temperature values are used to declare “the oceans are boiling,” when comparison of data with on line sea surface temperature values (for both the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans) were usually 4 degrees below normal, with some at or just above normal for that day.  

The average annual ocean temperature values also have a “lack of cold temperature” over the recent past as the northern waters are less cold because of the diminished contact with ice. My review of the Arctic ice pack records indicate that the ice pack could be recovering as it is gathering more multiyear ice each year, and does not have an annual decrease of any extent.  

And just what is an average annual temperature for this planet? I can’t image any credible manner in which such a value can be reliably achieved. It is time to cease publishing this type of data, and the misleading conclusions developed from them.

The Trans Alaska Pipeline System is our economic engine and we need to get it back up to running at a rate that will benefit all Alaska. Without all the interference from our current federal administration, we should have had a flow rate up to 1 million bpd upon completion of Willow, Pikka, ANWR and others that have been stalled.

So as you enter this fracas please approach this with more passion that you did the call to remove all impediments to the increased production of Cook Inlet gas. We still need to get this moved forward as quickly as we can. Tomorrow would not be too soon. The apparent lack of interest in the recent Cook Inlet leases does not truly represent real attitudes but does result from the ESG-biased financial decisions. I was disappointed that the Reduced Royalty on Cook Inlet gas did not move forward.

As we enter this fight please don’t attack the entrepreneurs who have provided wind, solar, and battery energy storage, as they do benefit the system. We got here by not mandating such alterations. We will need all the energy innovations that can provide benefit somewhere in Alaska.

Robert Seitz is an electrical engineer and lifelong Alaskan.

North Pole mayor, running for House, relieved of duties by unanimous city council vote

The North Pole City Council voted to relieve Mayor Mike Welch of his duties. The vote came after an executive session that occurred Monday, after complaints and revelations about poor management at the city.

Mayor Pro Tem Chandra Clack has moved to the mayor’s seat after the unanimous decision, which included Welch himself voting in favor of the motion. The next election for mayor comes in October, and Clack will serve until then unless other developments occur.

Welch had serious health conditions involving a concussion last year that forced him to take medical leave for several months, but he returned to work in April. The structure of the mayor’s office in North Pole is that the mayor runs the city’s day-to-day operations, and numerous complaints have arisen during his tenure involving procurement irregularities and access that his wife had to what are described as secure areas of city offices. He said his memory was shaky on aspects of those procurement irregularities. Some of the other issues the council was worried about were discussed in the meeting, the video of which is below:

Welch moved to North Pole in 1999 and was elected to the city council in 2005, and elected in 2008. In 2018, he was elected mayor and he was reelected in 2021. Welch filed this spring to run against House Rep. Mike Prax. Both are members of the Republican Party.

Chandra Cleck was born in Fairbanks before statehood and has been active in the Fairbanks and North Pole communities, serving on the board of Golden Valley Electric Association, running her own daycare center, and working as a substitute teacher. She is also involved with a pregnancy center devoted to saving unborn lives.