Saturday, May 9, 2026
Home Blog Page 310

Breaking: Peltola’s name and campaign listed in ‘fraudulent donor’ lawsuit filed in Wisconsin

Rep. Mary Peltola’s name appears in a lawsuit filed by the America First Policy Institute against a “John Doe” who made numerous donations to Democrat political campaigns, including hers.

Mark Block, a Republican consultant, said he discovered an old email account he used while working on Herman Cain’s 2012 presidential campaign had been used to donate to ActBlue, a major Democrat fundraising platform that has been the subject of congressional investigations for using fake accounts to channel money. When he checked the account, he found hundreds of receipts being sent there by ActBlue for donations supposedly made by him.

In the lawsuit filed in Wisconsin state court this week, Block says he is the victim of identity theft in a conspiracy that uses ActBlue as a mule for money — and for possible overseas donations from unknown actors.

Numerous Democrats politicians received money from the account that he claims was orphaned by him. They include Mary Peltola’s campaign and joint fundraising committee.

When conservative activist James O’Keefe of O’Keefe Media Group investigated the company earlier this year, he interviewed dozens of Americans who had never donated to Democrat candidates, but whose names and identities were being logged into the ActBlue online system, showing them making hundreds of thousands of dollars in donations. Many of these ActBlue victims were retired people on a fixed income who told O’Keefe they had no ability to have made such donations.

Democrats in Alaska, such as Peltola, use the ActBlue system for online donations every day. In fact, an Anchorage man who was arrested last month for threatening conservative Supreme Court justices had used ActBlue to donate to Peltola’s campaign, as well as to President Joe Biden’s campaign. 

The amounts donated through mule accounts are often very small and go under the radar of the Federal Elections Commission, which does not monitor small donations to political campaigns. In this way, the system has gone under the radar for years, becoming a behemoth in campaign donation funneling that has allowed Democrat candidates to vastly outperform the Republicans. The small donations add up. In Block’s case, over $800 was donated through the use of his old email address, and his is just one of millions of possible accounts being uses.

“For example, within a day of Vice President Harris taking over President Biden’s campaign, she received $81 million from 888,000 grassroots donors; this total quickly swelled to more than $310 million by the end of the month. Harris campaign spokesman Kevin Munoz stated that these donations represent ‘exactly the kind of grassroots energy and enthusiasm that wins elections,'” the lawsuit explained.

“Unfortunately, however, at least some of those donations—and similar donations to campaigns and organizations across the country—have been fraudulently made,” it continued. In the exhibit attached to the lawsuit were names of numerous Democrat candidates — among them Peltola — who had received tiny donations from the Mark Block email address.

Starting in May of 2024, Block’s account was used to make over $884 in donations to 62 campaigns and political groups. The Harris Victory Fund got 35 of the donations linked to his account.

“Plaintiff did not make, authorize, or consent to these donations to the ActBlue Campaigns, and the Defendant’s unlawful acts could expose Plaintiff to investigation by the FEC for contributions made under a false name,” the lawsuit said.

“While these fraudulent donations average out to a very small $3.24 per transaction, they fit nicely into a loophole created by Federal Election Commission (FEC) reporting requirements,” the complaint added.

For example, the Mary Peltola Victory Fund, a joint fundraising committee shared with Alaska Democratic Party, received $2.40 from the account owned by Mark Block on the same day the account supposedly gave Sherrod Brown, and Jon Tester, and the Harris Victory Fund similar small amounts. Peltola’s campaign itself received $2.60 on Sept. 12 from whoever is using Block’s email address.

The activity associated with fraudulent use of identities for political online donations described as “smurfing,” and is considered a form of identity theft. People with abandoned email accounts may find that those are being used to funnel money to campaigns without their knowledge. One Alaskan who spoke with Must Read Alaska said one of his old accounts had been used by ActBlue in a similar way. But most Americans don’t have the financial resources to litigate such matters.

“Specifically, federal law does not require campaigns to itemize contributions from donors when the aggregate amount totals less than $200. Campaigns that receive contributions below $200 can simply bundle the donation into a list of un-itemized contributions. Small dollar donations have seen explosive growth in recent years, with the number of reported transactions increasing by 400% just between the 2016 and 2020 elections,” the lawsuit said.

“Bad actors can influence elections by laundering their ‘smurfing’ activities (i.e., making contributions via the PII [personal identifiable information] of numerous donors or ‘smurfs’) through these anonymous bulk reports. Since FEC data on small-dollar donors is organized by donor rather than campaign, someone would first have to know or suspect who a ‘smurf’ might be before a record search would reveal a pattern of structured fraudulent donations. Unless of course that bad actor was like the John Doe in this case, and made the critical mistake of using the Plaintiff’s PII to launder fraudulent campaign contributions,” the lawsuit said.

The House Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating reports of potentially fraudulent and illicit financial activity related to contributions to campaigns of candidates for federal offices mediated by online fundraising platforms like ActBlue.

“Recent reports about ActBlue raise concerns about the threat of fraud and evasion of campaign finance law by individuals exploiting online contribution platforms. ActBlue had not implemented standard procedures to guard against identity theft and fraud such as requiring a Card Verification Value (CVV) to process online transactions until it received criticism for not doing so. ActBlue is also being investigated by several states’ officials in relation to contributions allegedly made through the platform fraudulently without the reported contributor’s awareness. Federal law prohibits contributions made in the name of another person,” the House Oversight Committee explained.

“The Committee is concerned that failure to properly vet contributions made through online platforms may have allowed bad actors to more easily commit fraud to illegally exploit and violate federal campaign finance laws. These bad actors could include foreign nationals not lawfully admitted for permanent residence who are prohibited by statute from contributing to campaigns or political parties. They could also include individuals looking to flout the limits of individual contributions by fraudulently using others’ identities to evade those limits, in addition to other criminal activity in violation of campaign finance laws,” the committee said in a letter to the Department of Treasury. “It is imperative that Congress determine whether legislation is necessary to ensure adherence to statutes related to campaign finance, and guard against foreign or unfair influence in our elections.”

Kamala targets black men with promises, saying she will legalize weed and forgive business loans

Kamala Harris is trying to shore up the black male vote, which has proved elusive to her.

Her new plan to bring in the black male vote is a promise that she will, as president, forgive taxpayer-funded business loans up to $20,000 for black male entrepreneurs, and to legalize marijuana. She also has plans for crypto, to “make sure owners of and investors in digital assets benefit from a regulatory framework so that Black men and others who participate in this market are protected.”

Her new opportunity plan for black men includes easier pathways for them to engage in a legalized marijuana trade. In addition, she has plans to forgive student loan debt for black male teachers.

According to the National Institutes of Health, In 2019, approximately 48 million people (17.5%) ages 12 and over in the United States reported using cannabis in the past year. Among past-year cannabis users, 3.5 million reported initiating cannabis use for the first time that year.

“The heavy and prolonged use of cannabis has been linked to several adverse health effects such as memory impairment, issues with executive functioning, and increased risk for developing a mental illness. Furthermore, the literature posits that 30% of weekly cannabis users will be diagnosed with Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD) in their lifetime. Despite the associated health risks, the perceived risk associated with weekly cannabis use has declined among all age groups (i.e., 12 and over) within the past-year, indicating increased likelihood for problematic use,” the NIH said in this paper.

The race for president is described by the media and pollsters as close, but the betting markets have broken for Donald Trump. Polymarket, one of the leading online betting sites, shows dramatic shift to Trump in recent days, which may have prompted Harris to use the marijuana-for-votes tactic in her campaign.

Who do you think will win in November? Leave your prediction in the comment section below.

Josiah Patkotak: Iñupiaq won’t allow North Slope to be co-opted for purposes not serving our people or our future

By MAYOR JOSIAH AULLAQSRUAQ PATKOTAK, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH

On May 28, the leader of the Native Village of Kaktovik received a letter from Merben Cebrian, the federal refuge manager for the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR). In this letter, Cebrian explained that, based on requests from the Native Village of Venetie and Arctic Village, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is considering designating a portion of ANWR — specifically 1.5 million acres — as sacred grounds for the Gwich’in under Executive Order 13007.

As mayor of the North Slope Borough and a proud member of the Iñupiaq people, I feel compelled to address this affront to our people’s ancestral lands.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s attempt to designate land as religious grounds for the Gwich’in people, land that has never been part of their historical territory, is not only misguided but an affront to the sovereignty and history of the Iñupiaq.

For thousands of years, the Iñupiaq people have lived, thrived and stewarded these lands. Our deep connection to the land and its resources is woven into the very fabric of our identity. Yet, today, we find ourselves at the crossroads of a dangerous and paternalistic attempt by the federal government to undermine our rights and history.

This is not a simple misunderstanding; it is a naked and transparent effort to advance a political agenda at the expense of our people.

Let me be clear: The land in question is not, and has never been, Gwich’in territory. If there is a claim that their ancestors are buried here, that is a result of territorial wars that occurred in a bygone era; and victors aren’t buried.

The historical territory of the Gwich’in is 150-200 miles away from the land in question. This is the same distance as that between New York and Washington, D.C. – or between Anchorage and Homer. The suggestion of designating these lands as sacred grounds for a people with no historical claim is more than just factually wrong — it’s a blatant misuse of authority. The Department of Interior has no business advancing such an egregious overreach.

Using the Gwich’in as a proxy, this federal administration, together with extreme environmentalists, is attempting to reconfigure our land rights under the guise of environmental stewardship, once again trying to brush aside the Iñupiaq people; as my Aaka says, “Shame on you.”

This is not about the protection of sacred sites; it is about control. It is about a federal government that thinks it knows better than the people who have lived on and cared for these lands since time immemorial. The Iñupiaq have always been the best stewards of our land. We understand its rhythms, its challenges, and its gifts in a way that no outside entity, or peoples, ever could. To have our history and our rights dismissed by bureaucrats thousands of miles away is unacceptable.

The Iñupiat people have fought for our land and our way of life for millennia, and we will not stand by as the federal government attempts to erase our history and rewrite it to suit their own ends.

You want local buy-in for your proposal on the eve of the presidential election?

Well, you don’t have it: neither from the North Slope Borough nor from the only people who live in ANWR’s 1002 area, the people of Kaktovik.

We respect the Gwich’in and their right to manage their lands far to the south of us. In return, we expect the same respect for our land, rights and history — non-negotiable principles long recognized by Congress through the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act and Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act. We stand firm in defending them.

The Iñupiat are not mere inhabitants of this land; we are its guardians. In this case, we guard against this federal administration’s actions, which are a stark reminder of the ongoing struggles Indigenous peoples face around the country simply asking not to be ignored.

The federal government must understand that any attempt to undermine our sovereignty will be met with fierce resistance. We will not allow our lands to be co-opted for purposes that serve neither our people nor our future.

Josiah Aullaqsruaq Patkotak is the mayor of the North Slope Borough and a former member of the Alaska House of Representatives.

Alex Gimarc: Ranked-choice voting took away a freedom few Alaskans have fully understood

By ALEX GIMARC

While there have been some infuriating ads run by the defenders of ranked-choice voting during the last couple months, they are ending their campaign on a real low note. 

It appears their polling has ended with the notion that they need to appeal to Alaska voters with the claim that the dark-money funded, party elites who want to repeal ranked-choice voting are singularly focused on stealing liberty and freedom from voters.

Specifically, which freedom are they claiming the anti-ranked-voting crowd is stealing? According to Vote No on 2 Chair Lesil McGuire, it is the freedom to vote for any candidate we want to in a political primary.

As usual, it is difficult to prove a negative, so let’s take a look at which freedoms and liberties are actually involved. More importantly, where do those freedoms actually come from?

If you were to take a look at both the U.S. Constitution and the Alaska Constitution for the freedom to vote for any candidate you want to, those freedoms are neither specified nor enumerated. While the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution does include a catch all that:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

The Ninth Amendment has similar language:

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

The meaning of both of these is that if those rights (freedoms, liberties) are not specifically mentioned in the Constitution, then they belong to the people and the states.  

This is great news for the backers of ranked-choice voting, as it is seemingly a green light to run around dispensing freedoms at the wave of their dark-money funded, Outside hands.

But there is a fly in the ointment, not uncommon when the left starts doling out so-called freedoms and liberties. And that fly in the ointment is a very real provision of the First Amendment, which states the following:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

The U.S. Supreme Court, via a series of opinions over the last century, determined that a freedom of association is “… and indispensable means of preserving” the enumerated First Amendment freedoms.  This right of association applies to “… speech, assembly, petition for the redress of grievances, and the exercise of religion.”

And what is a political party, other than a formal association created to support speech, assembly, and petitioning the redress of grievances?

It would appear that the ability of a political party to organize, select its own candidates, and participate in elections is a fundamental part of our First Amendment rights.  

No so, according to the “No on Prop 2” crowd. Not so, according to the black-robed political hacks masquerading as members of the Alaska Supreme Court.  Not so, according to the “No on Prop 2” dark-money backers.

We are in a position we often are arguing with the left-over freedoms and rights, where their newly created, shiny, sexy, media celebrated freedoms, liberties and rights (right to privacy, right to an abortion) quickly are elevated over pre-existing, enumerated freedoms, liberties and rights, which are usually discarded out of hand like the Alaska Supremes did to the freedom of association here in Alaska.  

If the right to select any candidate you want existed in either the U.S. or Alaska Constitution, we would be able to actually find it, written down in actual words.  That it doesn’t should tell us everything we want to know about the $7.8 million fraud the No on 2 campaign and its dark money outside backers are committing on the voters of Alaska.

If ranked-choice voting is such a good thing, why do its supporters need to commit fraud to defend it?

Alex Gimarc lives in Anchorage since retiring from the military in 1997. His interests include science and technology, environment, energy, economics, military affairs, fishing and disabilities policies. His weekly column “Interesting Items” is a summary of news stories with substantive Alaska-themed topics. He was a small business owner and Information Technology professional.

David Boyle: Anchorage superintendent’s contract may be extended again

By DAVID BOYLE

The Anchorage School Board majority wants to extend Superintendent Jarrett Bryantt’s contract for the second time in less than a year.

The first one-year contract extension was done in February — just eight months ago. That extended Bryantt’s contract through 2026. Only board member Dave Donley voted against that extension.

Now the board wants to add another year, extending the contract through 2027—more than three years from now.

Why is the board pushing for this contract extension, twice in less than a year?

The board must be pleased with the implementation of diversity-equity-inclusion (DEI) goals and Critical Race Theory in both the curriculum and hiring practices.

The board has even put DEI into its superintendent guardrails: “Superintendent will not operate without a plan to develop a qualified, diverse, and culturally responsive workforce.”

And remember the superintendent has implemented the “Transgender Guidelines,” in which it can hide from parents the gender identity and pronoun usage for students.

This is the same superintendent who removed the charter from the Family Partnership Charter School. As a result, parents removed more than 600 students from the Anchorage School District.

The district has also failed in its attempt to close excess schools, resulting in wasting money maintaining them. Parents pushed back against closing the six proposed schools and the district was not prepared for this opposition. Now it has too many schools and not enough students.

Former board president Margo Bellamy aligns with the superintendent and believes that social-emotional learning and “restorative justice” are vital to student achievement.  

But what about actual student achievement? Shouldn’t the superintendent be responsible for setting valid goals?

Here are the reading (3rd grade), math (8th grade) and graduation rates that Superintendent Bryantt will be held accountable for: 

So, by the end of the superintendent’s second contract extension, fewer than half of 3rd grade students should be able to read at grade level. That’s the reading goal.

And a little more than 41% of 8th grade students should be proficient in math. That’s the math goal.

These are very low goal that should be achievable.

The Anchorage School Board will vote on this one-year additional extension to the superintendent’s contract, as the matter is on the agenda for Oct. 15.

You can speak up here.

David Boyle is an education writer for Must Read Alaska.

Election Division sends correction in mail to District 15 after mistake that harmed Republican Mia Costello

The Alaska Division of Elections has sent a correction to voters in Anchorage’s District 15, advising them of a mistake the division made on the official election pamphlet, where on Page 19, the division or its contractor labeled candidate Mia Costello a Democrat.

Costello, a Republican, is running for the seat being vacated by Rep. Tom McKay. She’s running against two Democrats — Dustin Darden and Denny Wells.

The division workers evidently did not spot the error until the voter pamphlet was received by voters. It immediately corrected the online version of the information, but the one that was sent in the mail was the horse that had left the barn.

After the mistake was pointed out to the division, the Alaska Democratic Party then threatened to sue the Division of Elections if, on its corrected mail piece, it did not also list the Democrats who were appearing on the ballot. The division complied with the Democrats’ demand, and the mail piece has now been sent to district voters. Here’s how it looks:

In September, the Democrats also sued to keep a Democrat off of the ballot in Alaska, but they lost their lawsuit, which was a thinly veiled campaign attempt to protect Rep. Mary Peltola from having another Democrat on the November ballot.

A scam so big even national news noticed: Peltola refuses to remove egregious ads lying about Nick

A national news organization took notice this week that Rep. Mary Peltola is lying about Republican candidate Nick Begich, who she accuses of planning to destroy all fish in Alaska, outsource all jobs to other countries, and somehow remove all children from the state of Alaska.

Peltola’s campaign has hit some new lows in Alaska politics. “Nice Mary” has turned into “Vicious Mary” during the last days of the campaign. Some of Peltola’s bizarre ads are illustrated by these two found on her website, which she refuses to remove:

Republican candidate Nick Begich called out Peltola during the fisheries debate in Kodiak for lying about him with her ads.

“I think it’s also important that we be honest in politics. And you know, I’m seeing ads right now from, again, one of my opponents up here on stage that says, if you elect Nick Begich, there’ll be no more fish,’” Begich said. “Well, that is ridiculous, and that is shameful, and for her to maybe run ads like that that she approved from her campaign, lying to the people of Alaska, that’s wrong,” he added. 

Peltola responded that she knew nothing about the ads.

“I don’t know what attack ad is being referred to. I know nothing of this,” she said at the fish debate. “That was not my ad there. There are a lot of ads out there. I know I’ve had seven million dollars and attack ads over the last few weeks, and it’s time that I stand up for myself and stand up for Alaskans and say enough is enough: I’m not here to do any petty bickering.”

But if she didn’t really know what her own ads were saying then, she knows them, 10 days later. But she still won’t take them down.

Even the news outlet Townhall found her dishonesty to be of interest to its national audience.

Typically, it’s independent expenditure groups that are in charge of the mudslinging, and candidates try to distance themselves from that nasty aspect of campaigning. But Peltola herself has taken ownership of the role of chief mudslinger, spreading lies about Nick Begich, and savaging Nick’s father, Nick Begich Sr.

Peltola’s continuous attacks on Nick’s father’s business have risen to the level of an obsession with her opponent’s father, who is both a miner and a businessman, and Peltola has attempted to confuse voters, since the two share a family name.

At the same time, Peltola never brings up her own father, Ward Sattler of Stony River, nor does she invite him to events or appear with him in any photos or videos. In fact, Peltola never mentions her father. It’s only Nick Begich’s father that has her full and constant attention.

The best of Art Chance: Ranked-choice, mail-in, and the election system that’s long been ripe for fraud

By ART CHANCE

My earliest memories of things political in Alaska were the controversies surrounding Jay Hammond’s defeat of the legendary Bill Egan for governor in 1974, followed four years later by Hammond’s primary defeat of Wally Hickel. Both those elections were rife with error and fraud. 

The Alaska Supreme Court said in plain language that the 1978 Hammond-Hickel primary was tainted by malconduct to the extent that the true outcome was in doubt, but it refused to upset the election result.  There was fraud in Knowles’ 1998 victory over Robin Taylor but again, the court refused to upset the election result.

Back in the day, Alaska had four time zones and was, in Southeast Alaska, four time zones from the East Coast. On election night, once the votes came in from Southeast and the Railbelt, you knew how many votes you needed so you got on the phone to rural Alaska where you had two more time zones and two more hours to find votes; let the bidding begin.   

Those were the days when the “Bush Caucus” had enormous power in Alaska politics. I’ll never really understand why Gov. Bill Sheffield collapsed Alaska into one time zone (with a few small exceptions) because it took away one of the greatest power sources the Democrats had: the Bush Vote.   

Since the free gas incentives in the first Knowles election, fraud hasn’t been much of an issue in Statewide elections, which isn’t to say there wasn’t any, but it wasn’t determinative. There have been more than mere suspicion in many House, Senate, and local elections, but those don’t get much attention.

Alaska’s voting system has always been ripe for fraud. The registration system was far too loose, it was too easy to cast an absentee or challenged ballot, and supervision of the vote count was somewhere between scant and non-existent in much of the State. They were “finding” bags of ballots in the trunk of Trooper cars weeks after the elections in the Hammond-Egan and Hammond-Hickel elections. Somehow we became complacent in the Murkowski-Palin-Parnell-Walker years because the elections weren’t that close.

Then the good-government types did the stupidest thing in Alaska history; they came up with the Permanent Fund dividend automatic registration, as if motor-voter wasn’t fraud bait enough. Everybody and his dog can and does apply for a PFD. The Permanent Fund Division of the Department of Revenue has virtually no verification or fraud detection capability. It relies on PFD fraudsters doing something stupid and getting ratted out by their jealous neighbors. The State makes a lot of smoke and noise busting a few of them every so often and uses that as its fraud deterrent. Only God knows how many registered voter don’t live here or who don’t exist.

Fast forward to the Scamdemic. The communists, excuse me, Democrats used the Scamdemic as their justification to assault Alaska’s already sketchy election laws. There were plenty of leftist judges who were ever-so happy to go along. The judges removed the second signature verification from absentee ballots. They sent out unrequested absentee ballot applications to thousands of “registered” voters who might or might not exist. 

We already had an extended early voting period, so the Democrats could use George Soros or SEIU money to bring punks with iPads north to work the neighborhoods and harvest votes or, some think, harvest ballot applications from mailboxes. I don’t know how much the unions and other leftist groups were using their resources to produce fraudulent ballots, but they certainly had the capability. Give them a list of registered voters that you know no longer live in the district or even in the State, and they’ll give you however many votes you want.

If you were trying to design a voting scheme that was easy to defraud, look no further than Anchorage’s all mail ballot system. Anchorage uses the State of Alaska’s filthy voter rolls. Practically everybody who has come to Alaska seeking a summer job or fleeing an arrest warrant and who applied for unemployment and food stamps is a registered voter, even if they didn’t get the job and went back to Podunk in a month. Practically every military guy who got ordered here applied for a PFD when eligible and even though it has been 10 years and he/she has no intention of ever returning, s/he’s a registered voter in Alaska and a PFD recipient. 

Anchorage has a lengthy “early voting” period and provides anyone who asks a list of who has and hasn’t voted so far. That is simply a vote harvesting scheme. If you are a union, you have a very accurate contact list of all your members, in most cases provided to you by a public employer at public expense. You check the list of who has and hasn’t voted, and you send somebody to go jack up the ones that haven’t.  

The leftist special interest groups are almost as effective but they have to do their own work to keep their contact lists up to date. The unions and the leftist front groups WILL get out their vote. I’ve always suspected that a lot of those people don’t know they voted, but we’ve never had a government that was courageous or honest enough to check.

In Anchorage, the Left buys votes at wholesale; conservatives/Republicans have to get their vote at retail. The Democrats/leftists/union get most of their votes in neatly organized blocks of union members and interest group members. They are easy to identify and turn out, and particularly with the union members there is an implicit threat if they don’t turn out and vote “right.” 

The Left can organize their vote without ever running a single mass media advertisement; email and social media will contact every one of their constituents, and only their constituents.   

The Right has to try to contact their constituencies through a hopelessly fragmented media market and with shoe leather and phone calls, and since the State’s rolls don’t have accurate or up-to-date addresses or contact numbers, a conservative candidate has to spend a lot of money for somewhat more accurate lists, or just trudge down the streets of the districts hoping to find somebody who hasn’t already voted for the leftist. 

Even the shoe leather is somewhat subsidized by the public treasury to turn out the Left’s vote. Most unions have some sort of paid release from work for “union business.”   Union members can be released from duty with pay to handbill, put up signs, or engage in get-out-the-vote activities for union endorsed candidates at the public expense. I have personal knowledge of union/Democrat get-out-the-vote phone banks set up in State of Alaska conference rooms. I have personal knowledge of union members being sent out to put up signs for union backed candidates on “work” time. 

The elections are rigged.

And, no, the exception isn’t proof; Mayor Bronson’s election was a fluke.   Mayor Ethan Berkowitz’ implosion and the growing revulsion to the leftist Assembly’s Scamdemic fascism made his election possible, but that election gave him nothing with which to govern; he has one and a half votes on the Assembly, an Assembly which is dedicated to the proposition of not letting him govern.   

So long as we have the current mail ballot electoral system, the Municipal government will only serve public employees and parasites; the rest of us just get to pay for it all. The School Board is no better — the taxpayers and parents have one vote on the board, Dave Donley; the teachers’ union has the rest.

Lots of Republicans are pounding their chests about an impending “Red Tsunami” because of the Democrats’ weak showing in the polls these days.   

It is an illusion; they don’t have to win the vote, they just have to win the count.

Art Chance was a retired Director of Labor Relations for the State of Alaska, formerly of Juneau and then living in Anchorage. He was the author of the book, “Red on Blue, Establishing a Republican Governance,” available at Amazon. This column first ran in February of 2022 and is rerun in his memory. Art Chance died on Oct. 17, 2023.

Alex Gimarc: Denny Wells, the Trojan Horse candidate in District 15

By ALEX GIMARC

Here in South Anchorage, District 15, we are treated to three candidates. 

Two of them are Democrats. There’s perennial candidate Dustin Dardin and another perennial, Denny Wells, who has run for the past few cycles. They are running against Republican Mia Costello to replace incumbent Tom McKay, who won the last two times around.

Wells is the prototypical Democrat candidate, surrounding himself with happy, joyful photos of his young family in an attempt to convince us all that he is something other than what he is. 

I received his campaign mailer last week. It is large format, 8 x 12”, full color printed on card stock — an expensive piece of work.  

On the mailer, he claims he understands the issues that matter most to us. In his own words, the issues include the following:

  • Protecting abortion rights and ensuring Alaskans have access to birth control and IVF treatments
  • Supporting strong public schools so all our kids can succeed
  • Lowering costs for families and creating new, good paying jobs
  • Keeping our communities and families safe
  • Making healthcare and prescription drugs more affordable

Looking at his bio, his website and his campaign literature, he has done nothing in his entire life to deal with any of these important priorities, making this list little more than standard Democrat campaign rhetoric. But words are indeed important, so let’s at least look at a few of them in an attempt to predict what he is truly about.

In his campaign mailer, Wells posts a photo of a happy family with three young daughters. If you have three daughters at a young age, abortion rights are simply not important.  Whose babies is he proposing to terminate? 

As for IVF, Alaska had under 9,400 total births in 2022 among the entire population, meaning IVF is at best less than 100 of that total. This means IVF as an issue in Alaska is nonexistent, making Wells interest in it little more than a current Democrat talking point.

He claims to support strong public schools, while ignoring the complete meltdown of those very same public schools, infestation by Critical Race Theory and the trans craze. Worse, he refuses to acknowledge that Anchorage School District hired an unqualified superintendent who pledged to further both CRT and trans while the Anchorage School Board hides that commitment from the general public.  Thank you, Margo Belamy. 

Want to fix the public schools? Put control of the money as close to the students as humanly possible. Yes, that means vouchers. 

There are other examples, but you get the idea. This boy is a committed lefty, saying and doing whatever he needs to say and do to get elected.

An analysis of his campaign donations is also instructive. If  you go into APOC and search under Denmar Wells (his actual name), you end up with a list of over 1,150 donations by Aug 10, 2024 is most instructive. 

Sort the list by largest donations, and you first come up with Robin Brena, former Gov. Bill Walker’s bag man, anti-oil jihadi with a cool $20,000 to start the campaign. 

The list of $1,000 donations goes on to a murderer’s row of unions and union PACs, along with strong support from Andrew Halcro, who’s never seen a Republican he didn’t want to knife in the back. These donations total $77,000 of his $190,000.  Who do you think is going to be driving his legislative bus should he be elected?

From this, Denny Wells is the next iteration of Young Master Jason Grenn, who bounced Rep. Liz Vazquez out of the Legislature in 2016 because he was young and fresh. Rep. Grenn ended up being a Democrat tool, a legislative disaster who most recently helped saddle Alaska with ranked-choice voting. Wells looks like him, campaigns like him, and will have a similar negative impact to our wallets and livelihoods.

I would think long and hard before considering any of Denmar Wells’ empty promises. 

Mia Costello is proven, reliable, and has delivered for years in this part of town. It’s time to return her to the House. It’s time to ignore, once again, the unions and their Trojan Horse candidates.    

Alex Gimarc lives in Anchorage since retiring from the military in 1997. His interests include science and technology, environment, energy, economics, military affairs, fishing and disabilities policies. His weekly column “Interesting Items” is a summary of news stories with substantive Alaska-themed topics. He was a small business owner and Information Technology professional.