Monday, May 11, 2026
Home Blog Page 1681

Murkowski, Sullivan dine with Trump

2

THE PROTESTORS HAVE INFILTRATED THE MEDIA

Sen. Lisa Murkowski, Sen. Dan Sullivan and other Senate leaders are having their weekly policy luncheon today, and President Donald Trump is attending. Usually Vice President Mike Pence attends.

Before the “Unity” lunch, as it’s billed, Trump and Sen. Bob Corker of Tennessee traded indignities and insults over tax reform, in a battle of words that swamped the news cycle.

The lunch, in the historic Mansfield Room of the Capitol is intended to demonstrate unity on the Republican agenda of tax reform, health care reform, and energy dominance.

A protestor, posing as a journalist, threw papers with the image of the Puerto Rico flag on them at Trump as he arrived at the luncheon with Sen. Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, as seen in this screen shot of a video shot by NBC’s Frank Thorpe V. The protestor was removed in handcuffs by Capitol security.

Trump last attended a Senate Republican lunch in 2016, when he was the party’s nominee for president.

Three committees for crime reform cut quickly to two

1

On April 7, when the House Democrats received Senate Bill 54 crime legislation after it passed the Senate, they assigned it to three committees — a death sentence.

No committee hearings were ever held, and criminals were free to roam, rob, and wreak havoc all summer in Alaska and well into the fall. And they have.

Today, on the first day of the fourth special session of the year, Democrats waived the legislation through the House State Affairs Committee, which was its first committee of referral. It is on to Judiciary, where Chairman Matt Claman has promised plenty of public input.

Hearings today will go three hours, and beginning at 6 pm on Tuesday, House Judiciary will hear another three hours of public testimony on criminal justice reform and its impact on their lives.

The public can listen and watch the committee proceedings here.

http://akleg.gov/#tab5

Related documents for SB 54 are linked here.

Things are looking up for Alaska economy

0

By WIN GRUENING
SENIOR CONTRIBUTOR

If you were to judge our economic prospects by listening to most media reports and political commentary, you would conclude Alaska’s economy is in a death spiral with little hope of recovery. Yet, there are many signs just the opposite is occurring.

During a recent swing through SE Alaska, Sen. Dan Sullivan explained he is extremely optimistic about pending Congressional action on tax reform along with a number of other developments that will positively affect our state.

Sen. Sullivan feels strongly better days are ahead now that Congress is finally working on ways to revive our nation’s sluggish economy. Mired down in debates about immigration, healthcare and Russian influence in our election, Congress has paid scant attention to our economy.

GROWING ECONOMY: During the 8-year Obama presidency, the country never returned to the economic growth America experienced prior to the 2008 recession. Since 1929, U. S. GDP has averaged 5.8% and post -WWII has averaged 3.2%

Yet, GDP growth averaged less than 1.5% during Obama’s administration. Masked by a bull market on Wall Street, the country’s mediocre GDP growth has been dismissed by Obama defenders and the media by simply labelling it the “new normal.”

President Trump set an ambitious 3% growth target for 2017, to be achieved through a mix of tax cuts, deregulation and infrastructure spending. While this may prove to be optimistic for 2017, Alaska will benefit by progress in all these areas as will the rest of the country.

ANWR: During congressional debate on a tax reform package, the Senate Budget Committee tasked the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, chaired by Sen. Lisa Murkowski, to find ways of generating an additional $1 billion in revenue.

Of special interest to Alaskans, this may result in the approval of drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge as a method of raising that revenue.

Since this provision would be decided under budget reconciliation rules, a simple majority of the Senate would be needed to approve it – not the 60 vote super-majority required to break a filibuster. Passage of this measure would allow responsible oil development in ANWR – long favored by most Alaskans.

MILITARY: Another issue benefitting Alaska is Congress’s efforts to further strengthen our military. With increased tension over North Korea’s nuclear ambitions and missile program, national security remains an important topic in Washington and much of the resulting military spending will occur in Alaska – the backbone of our nation’s strategic missile defense program.

The latest National Defense Authorization Act requires 20 new ground-based missile interceptors at Fort Greely near Fairbanks, additional F-35s at Eielson Air Force Base and construction of six new icebreakers to serve an Arctic increasingly seen as threatened by Russia’s buildup of nuclear-capable icebreakers.

ALASKANS IN CHARGE: Alaskans should also be particularly heartened by recent appointments at the Federal level directly impacting how (and if) Alaskans will be able to continue developing their natural resources.

In June, Chris Oliver was named assistant administrator for NOAA Fisheries. No stranger to Alaska, Oliver has worked at the North Pacific Fishery Management Council for 27 years – first as a fisheries biologist, later as deputy director, and finally as executive director.

Another important federal appointment recently announced was Drue Pearce, as Deputy Administrator for the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. Pearce is a former Alaska legislator and State Senate President and has served in several federal positions where she oversaw efforts to advance the nation’s energy, environmental, and economic security.

Tara Sweeney was recently nominated as Assistant Secretary in the Department of Interior overseeing the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). Originally from Utqiaġvik (Barrow), Sweeney has served Arctic Slope Regional Corporation for nearly 20 years in a variety of roles, most recently as executive vice president of external affairs. It would be the first presidential nomination and U.S. Senate-confirmed position for any Alaska Native woman in the history of the state.

President Trump has also announced the nomination of Joe Balash to be an Assistant Secretary of the Interior, Land and Mineral Management. Balash, a North Pole native, has been serving as Chief of Staff for Sen. Sullivan.

This position, when confirmed, would make Balash the primary manager of federal lands and waters – critical to Alaska since two-thirds of Alaska’s land is controlled by the federal government. A former Alaska DNR Commissioner, Balash has more than 19 years of experience in land and natural resource management.

Alaska’s dependence on oil revenues won’t be reduced dramatically anytime soon. With oil prices projected to hover in the $50/barrel range for the foreseeable future, reversing declining production remains paramount. This is the only way to stabilize Alaska’s pipeline revenues while we are working to diversify our economy in other ways.

These recent developments will help us do that and bode well for Alaska and our country.

Win Gruening retired as the senior vice president in charge of business banking for Key Bank in 2012. He was born and raised in Juneau and graduated from the U.S. Air Force Academy in 1970. He is active in community affairs as a 30-plus year member of Juneau Downtown Rotary Club and has been involved in various local and statewide organizations.

Alaska’s self-licking ice cream cone

4

GARY WILKEN
GUEST COMMENTARY

I’ve great respect for Gov. Bill Walker. He’s been dealt some difficult hands to play, particularly in regard to our state’s budget. However, I’m very disappointed in his special session platform revealing troubling expectations for the upcoming special session.

With all due respect, our governor must speak in complete sentences. In an Oct. 2 presentation to Commonwealth North, he spoke of the Oct. 23 session and his expectations. The governor said, “We’re at a point where we can no longer be the only state in the nation that doesn’t have a broadbased tax.”

That sentence is incomplete. The governor should finish it by saying, “and we’re the only state in the nation with $64 billion in the bank solely for the benefit of its residents.”

Gary Wilken

Think of that: Alaskans have $64 billion in the bank, but our governor is asking the Legislature to ignore that wealth and tax only the working people of Alaska to fund government. There’s something wrong here.

Each and every Alaskan currently has an $87,000 plus investment account, and it’s growing every day.

For 30 years, each Alaskans’ account has yielded investment earnings, earnings used for our Alaska Permanent Fund dividend with the remainder left in the Permanent Fund Earnings Reserve account, which today contains about $14 billion. This account has always been available for appropriation by our Legislature.

But for years the Legislature has been afraid to spend from the earnings reserve. They’ve been paralyzed by B.S. — that is, the bumper sticker screaming in the next election that he or she is “Raiding our Permanent Fund.” And then next comes the inevitable accusation:

“Hey! You’re stealing my PFD.”

It’s a common reaction, as it should be. The dividend is the people’s money. It’s the result of developing our resources and wisely setting aside 25 percent of the revenue for the people rather than spending it on bigger government.

But back to the earnings reserve, which is the source of the annual dividend check. Let’s look at the effect on the dividend check if we withdraw a certain amount from the earnings reserve account in order to fund services needed for government. The source of the following calculations is a document from the Alaska Permanent Fund Corp. entitled “Financial Projection Comparisons of the Alaska Permanent Fund with Various Appropriation Levels to the General Fund” and is dated April 4, 2017.

It was produced by the corporation and is available from me at [email protected].

Everyone has their own number representing our deficit. My number is somewhere around $2 billion. So, let’s for the next five years take, if needed, $2 billion each year to help fund this shortfall. That amount, maybe with a little help from the constitutional budget reserve if needed, fills the budget hole.

But here comes that Big Question:

“What happens to my PFD check?”

According to the Permanent Fund Corp., these are the answers: 1. The first year it shrinks by less than a dollar; 2. The second year it’s $22 less; 3. Over the five-year period our dividend is a total of $420 less because of the $10 billion withdrawal; 4. Over five years that’s a reduction in your dividend of 3.2 percent. ($13,087 vs. $12,667).

Conclusion? The effect of using a reasonable amount of the earnings reserve account to fund needed government services has little effect on our dividend check.

Now, folks will say, “Well that’s OK for five years, but we’re draining our big savings account.”

That’s certainly cause for concern, but it’s not quite accurate. If we look beyond my five-year example, the documents show if we adopted a spending strategy for longevity by paying a static “half dividend” as we are now and not inflation- proofing unless needed, as we are now, the earnings reserve account lasts until fiscal 2030. There’s a lot of good things that will happen in Alaska in the next dozen years.

But you ask, “How can this be?” Well, it’s because of the enormous effect of $64 billion being invested around the world by the world’s best money managers. It’s the power of earnings. It’s what the late Michael Burns, CEO of the Permanent Fund Corp., said when speaking of the earnings reserve account.

He called it “Alaska’s self-licking ice cream cone.”

So, let’s complete the governor’s sentence by recognizing the true wealth of Alaska’s balance sheet. Let’s use the power of earnings to enable every Alaskan to contribute just a little so the working families of Alaska don’t have to pay a lot.

Gary Wilken is a retired small businessman and a former state senator who represented Fairbanks and Fort Wainwright from 1996 to 2008. He served eight years on the Senate Finance Committee, four years as a co-chairman.

Must Read comment: Free the land up

0

Highlighting comments from readers of Must Read Alaska

“Alaska has always been a colony. Mallott is wrong, we don’t need an income tax here.

The state of Alaska sitting on over 600,000 acres of land that it sells off in 5 acre chunks. 5 acres in Alaska is useless to anyone except for recreational cabins.

The average size of a cattle ranch in British Columbia is 1,000 acres. And there are quite a few of them. Release the land to people who want to create farms and ranches or any other business where they can turn a profit.

There is no reason why Alaska cannot be independent, no reason except for people like those we find in Juneau.

As with most problems, the answer isn’t more government. The answer is less.”

– Ken, responding to “Mallot to Alaskans: We need taxes, or we’ll be a colony”

Quote of the day: Mallott on tarped bodies, taxes

1

“In rural Alaska, to have a young person be murdered and lay in a rock quarry covered in a tarp for four days because police could not get there in time to begin the process of trying to bring a perpetrator to justice… Where is the bloated budget for that?”

– Lt. Gov. Byron Mallott on Oct. 19, 2017 speaking to the Alaska Federation of Natives.

“I am concerned that the sheer size of State government is making this more and more difficult. I speak from my experience as a staff level State employee, an agency director and member of the Alaska Cabinet when I suggest that much tighter control than currently exists be placed upon the growth of government operations. State employees are public servants in the highest sense and I do not mean to denigrate them. But the bureaucracy  of our government collectively is a powerful institution of a size when juxtaposed against Alaska’s total voting population that even now raises the issue of our real ability to control it.

“Having said that about State government growth (while cleverly not suggesting specific remedies) can I then responsibly move to discuss what more government must do? Absolutely for I believe that it is easily within the capacity of the current level of government operations to significantly increase it service if priorities are rearranged and the bureaucracy restructured. I suggest that the remedies are fairly obvious and known to policy makers. What must be determined is the political will to act.”

– Byron Mallott in 1980, in a booklet titled “Challenge of Plenty,” published by Dave Harbour and Common Sense for Alaska.

 

Department of Corruptions

9

CORRRECTIONS IS HAVING TROUBLE AT THE TOP

Without revealing why, the Walker Administration fired two senior executives from the Department of Corrections this month.

One is now-former Director of Institutions Bruce Busby. He was the top dog of the prison system.

The other is now-former Deputy Director Caitlin Price, who was Corrections Commissioner Dean Williams’ go-to person to get things done.

Both were dismissed simultaneously. No one will go on record as to why, but the word among Corrections officers is that there was an inappropriate relationship.

There were trips paid by the State to attend and perform official duties … some of which went unperformed … while certain other duties were performed. At the State’s expense.

There are photos, the folks in Corrections say. There are receipts for hotels and bed-and-breakfasts.

Why is this a scandal? Sworn officers, like police and corrections officers, have control over the lives of prisoners. The prison system puts guards and managers in positions of complete power and control over others, making it easily abused. So, the public wants them beyond reproach.

And there’s something else: Gov. Walker said he cleaned up Corrections in 2015. But after promoting Ron Taylor to commissioner upon taking office, the governor abruptly fired him a few months later, saying that the department was “broken” and “in turmoil.”

Why did Walker fire Taylor? His firing was based on a report written for him by the former director of the McLaughlin Youth Center, Dean Williams. Williams was in Walker’s close circle of advisers.

“I think the department has a hard time investigating itself like many agencies do, so out of our report we’re recommending a separate arm with existing resources,” Walker said in the terse press conference in November of 2015, when he announced that he had fired Taylor and put Walt Monegan in charge of Corrections, temporarily. (Monegan later became Public Safety commissioner.)

“We look at a process or model where we can investigate ourselves with high credibility and high trust. Right now we have a broken system,” Walker said.

The report by Williams called for a third-party investigation of administrative and criminal issues. Williams was a special assistant to the governor when he authored the report. He was just the guy to fix it.

Soon, Williams himself was commissioner.

A year later, Williams started a new internal affairs unit to transform the department to be more accountable. He asked a group to go through his report and help him restructure the department.

But people up and down the chain of command in Corrections had already found deep problems with the report. Some Corrections employees had lost their jobs, perhaps unfairly, due to the allegations by Williams.

The union, ACOA, started raising questions about the process used to generate the report that ultimately had gotten Williams his plum job. Pretty soon, there were too many questions and things got rather uncomfortable for Williams. The turmoil started to erode his credibility.

This is where it gets murky. Parts of this story cannot be written because sources would be revealed. Suffice it to say, what we can report so far appears to be only the tip of the iceberg.

“People felt like he got the job because he wrote the report in his favor, but there are a lot of disputable items in this report,” said one source who spoke on condition of anonymity. “There were some really questionable investigative techniques.”

Must Read Alaska learned from people within the Department of Corrections that the firing of two top officers in the Corrections Department for having an inappropriate relationship was needed, but it left untouched others who are engaged in similar behaviors that compromise the integrity of the department.

“It’s common knowledge among personnel that there are people at the top engaging in this behavior,” the source said, behavior that appears to involve misuse of state funds for inappropriate purposes.

In other words, not much has changed at the Department of Corruptions. Things may have gotten even worse.

 

(Do you have a tip about the Department of Corrections scandal? Must Read Alaska will protect you as a source. [email protected])

Got a tip? Send a note

Send your news tips or suggestions to [email protected]. You can also follow Must Read Alaska on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/mustreadalaska/

Sunday morning best: ‘There’s no truth’

1
“What the Kelly exchange proved to me the day before is there is no truth to be found anywhere in the (White House) press room. It’s all theater. It’s all there to put not only their best foot forward but to deny reality. They have not once admitted one mistake, while they are anxious to go after us as purveyors of fake media.”
– Brian Karem, Playboy Magazine correspondent and White House reporter, on CNN criticizing the Trump Administration and Chief of Staff John Kelly and saying he as a reporter had grown numb to the White House press briefings.
When it comes to denying reality, nobody does it better than Playboy. They’ve make a killing on promoting hyper-fake. Brian Karem’s Sunday morning sermon on CNN is a whole lot of fake outrage.
For something not fake, read John Kelly’s full remarks about President Trump’s call to the widow of the soldier:

Well, thanks a lot. And it is a more serious note. So I just wanted to perhaps make more of a statement than an — give more an explanation than a — what amounts to be a traditional press interaction.Most Americans don’t know what happens when we lose one of our soldiers, sailors, Airmen, Marines or Coast Guardsmen in combat. So let me tell you what happens. Their buddies wrap them up in whatever passes as a shroud, puts them on a helicopter as a routine and sends them home.

 

Their first stop along the way is when they’re packed in ice, typically at the airhead, and then they’re flown to usually Europe, where they’re then packed in ice again and flown to Dover Air Force Base. Where Dover takes care of the remains, embalms them, meticulously dresses them in their uniform with the — with the medals that they’ve earned, the emblems of their service, and then puts them on another airplane linked up with a casualty officer escort that takes them home.

 

A very, very good movie to watch, if you haven’t ever seen it, is “Taking Chance,” where this is done in a movie, HBO setting. Chance Phelps was killed under my command right next to me. And it’s worth seeing that, if you’ve never seen it. So that’s the process.

 

While that’s happening, a casualty officer typically goes to the home very early in the morning and waits for the first lights to come on. And then he knocks on the door, typically the mom and dad will answer. Wife. And if there is a wife, this is happening in two different places. If the parents are divorced, three different places. And the casualty officer proceeds to break the heart of a family member and stays with that family until — well, for a long, long time. Even after the internment. So that’s what happens. Who are these young men and women? They are the best 1 percent this country produces.

 

Most of you, as Americans, don’t know them. Many of you don’t know anyone who knows any one of them. But they are the very best that this country produces. And they volunteer to protect our country when there’s nothing in our country anymore that seems to suggest that selfless service to the nation is not only appropriate, but required. But that’s all right.

 

Who writes letters to the families? Typically the company commander. In my case, as a Marine, the company commander, battalion commander, regimental commander, division commander, secretary of defense, typically the service chief, commandant of the Marine Corps and the president typically writes a letter.

 

Typically, the only phone calls a family receives are the most important phone calls they can imagine, and that is from their buddies. In my case, hours after my son was killed, his friends were calling us from Afghanistan, telling us what a great guy he was.

 

Those are the only phone calls that really matter. And, yes, the letters count a degree, but there’s not much that really can take the edge off what a family member is going through.

 

So, some presidents have elected to call. All presidents, I believe, have elected to send letters. If you elect to call a family like this, it is about the most difficult thing you can imagine. There’s no perfect way to make that phone call.

 

When I took this job and talked to President [Donald] Trump about how to do it, my first recommendation was he not do it, because it’s not the phone call that parents, family members are looking forward to. It’s nice to do, in my opinion, in any event.

 

He asked me about previous presidents, and I said I can tell you that President [Barack] Obama, who was my commander-in-chief when I was on active duty, did not call my family. That was not a criticism. That was just to simply say, I don’t believe President Obama called. That’s not a negative thing.

 

I don’t believe President [George W.] Bush called in all cases. I don’t believe any president, particularly when the casualty rates are very, very high, that presidents call.

 

But I believe they all write. So, when I gave that explanation to our president three days ago, he elected to make phone calls in the case of the four young men who we lost in Niger at the earlier part of this month. And then he said, you know, what — how do you make these calls? If you’re not in the family, if you have never worn the uniform, if you have never been in combat, you can’t even imagine how to make that call.

 

I think he very bravely does make those calls.

 

The call in question that he made yesterday, day before yesterday now, were to four family members, the four fallen. And, remember, there’s a next of kin designated by the individual. If he’s married, that’s typically the spouse. If he’s not married, that’s typically the parents, unless the parents are divorced, and then he selects one of them. If he didn’t get along with parents, he will select a sibling.

 

But the point is, the phone call is made to the next of kin, only if the next of kin agrees to take the phone call. Sometimes, they don’t.

 

So, a pre-call is made. The president of the United States or the commandant of the Marine Corps or someone would like to call. Will you accept the call? And, typically, they all accept the call.

 

So, he called four people the other day, and expressed his condolences in the best way that he could.

 

And he said to me, what do I say? I said to him, “Sir, there’s nothing you can do to lighten the burden on these families. But let me tell you what I tell them. Let me tell you what my best friend, Joe Dunford, told me, because he was my casualty officer. He said, ‘Kel, he was doing exactly what he wanted to do when he was killed. He knew what he was getting into by joining that 1 percent. He knew what the possibilities were, because we’re at war. And when he died’ — and the four cases we’re talking about Niger, in my son’s case, in Afghanistan — ‘when he died, he was surrounded by the best men on this earth, his friends.'”

 

That’s what the president tried to say to four families the other day.

 

I was stunned when I came to work yesterday morning and brokenhearted at what I saw a member of Congress doing, a member of Congress who listened in on a phone call from the president of the United States to a young wife, and in his way tried to express that opinion that he’s a brave man, a fallen hero. He knew what he was getting himself into, because he enlisted. There’s no reason to enlist. He enlisted. And he was where he wanted to be, exactly where he wanted to be, with exactly the people he wanted to be with when his life was taken. That was the message. That was the message that was transmitted.

 

It stuns me that a member of Congress would have listened in on that conversation, absolutely stuns me. And I thought at least that was sacred. You know, when I was a kid growing up, a lot of things were sacred in our country. Women were sacred, looked upon with great honor. That’s obviously not the case anymore, as we see from recent cases. Life, the dignity of life was sacred. That’s gone. Religion, that seems to be gone as well. Gold Star families, I think that left in the convention over the summer.

 

I just thought the selfless devotion that brings a man or woman to die on the battlefield, I just thought that that might be sacred.

 

And when I listened to this woman and what she was saying and what she was doing on TV, the only thing I could do to collect my thoughts was to go and walk among the finest men and women on this earth. And you can always find them, because they’re in Arlington National Cemetery. I went over there for an hour-and-a-half, walked among the stones, some of whom I put there, because they were doing what I told them to do when they were killed.

 

I’ll end with this. And in October — or April, rather, of 2015, I was still on active duty. And I went to the dedication of the new FBI field office in Miami. And it was dedicated to two men who were killed in a firefight in Miami against drug traffickers in 1986 by the name of Grogan and Duke. Grogan almost retired, 53 years old. Duke, I think less than a year on the job. Anyways, they got in a gunfight and they were killed. Three other FBI agents were there, were wounded, now retired.

 

So, we go down. Jim Comey gave an absolutely brilliant memorial speech to those fallen men and the — and to all of the men and women of the FBI who serve our country so well and law enforcement so well. There were family members there. Some of the children that were there were only three or four years old when their dads were killed on that street in Miami-Dade. Three of the men that survived the fight were there and gave a rendition of how brave those men were and how they gave their lives.

 

And a congresswoman stood up, and in a long tradition of empty barrels making the most noise, stood up there in all of that and talked about how she was instrumental in getting the funding for that building, and how she took care of her constituents because she got the money, and she just called up President Obama, and on that phone call, he gave the money, the $20 million, to build the building, and she sat down. And we were stunned, stunned that she’d done it. Even for someone that is that empty a barrel, we were stunned.

 

But, you know, none of us went to the press and criticized. None of us stood up and were appalled. We just said, “OK, fine.”

 

So, I still hope, as you write your stories, and I appeal to America, that let’s not let this maybe last thing that is held sacred in our society, a young man, a young woman going out and giving his or her life for our country, let’s try to somehow keep that sacred. But it eroded a great deal yesterday by the selfish behavior of a member of Congress.

 

So, I’m willing to take a question or two on this — on this topic. Let me ask you this. Let me ask you this.

 

Is anyone here a Gold Star parent or sibling? Does anyone here know a Gold Star parent or sibling?

 

OK. You get the question.

 

REPORTER QUESTION: Thank you, Gen. Kelly. First of all, you have a great deal respect, semper fi, for everything that you have ever done, but if we could take this a bit further, why were they in Niger? What was — we were told they weren’t in armored vehicles and there was no air cover. So, what are the specifics about this particular incident, and why were we there, and why are we there?

 

Well, I would start by saying there is an investigation.

 

Let me back up and say, the fact of the matter is, young men and women that wear our uniform are deployed around the world, and there are tens of thousands, and near the DMZ, in North Korea, and in Okinawa ready to go — in South Korea — in Okinawa, ready to go, all over the United States, training, ready to go. They’re all over Latin America. Down there, they do mostly drug interdiction working with our partners, our great partners, the Colombians, the Central Americans, the Mexicans.

 

You know, there’s thousands. My own son right now in — back in the fight for his fifth tour in — against ISIS. There’s thousands of them in Europe, acting as a deterrent, and throughout Africa, and they’re doing the nation’s work there, and not making a lot of money, by the way, doing it. They love what they do.

 

So, why were they there? They’re there working with partners, local Africa — all across Africa in this case, Niger, working with partners, teaching them how to be better soldiers, teaching them how to respect human rights, teaching them how to fight ISIS, so that we don’t have to send our soldiers and Marines there in their thousands. That’s what they were doing there.

 

Now, there is an investigation. There’s always an — unless it’s a very, very conventional death in a conventional war — there’s always an investigation. Of course, that operation is conducted by AFRICOM that is — of course, works directly for the secretary of defense. There is a — I talked to Jim Mattis this morning. I think he made statements this afternoon. There’s an investigation ongoing. An investigation doesn’t mean anything was wrong. An investigation doesn’t mean people’s heads are going to roll.

 

The fact is, they need to find out what happened and why it happened. But, at the end of the day, ladies and gentlemen, you have to understand that these young people, and sometimes old guys, put on the uniform, go to where we send them to protect our country. Sometimes, they go in large numbers to invade Iraq and invade Afghanistan. Sometimes, they’re working in small units, working with our partners in Africa, Asia, Latin America, helping them be better. But, at the end of the day, they’re helping those partners be better at fighting ISIS in North Africa to protect our country, so that we don’t have to send large numbers of troops.

 

Any other — someone who knows who knows a Gold Star fallen person.

 

John.

 

REPORTER QUESTION: General, thank you for being here today, and thank you for your service. There has been some talk about the timetable of the release of the statement about the — I think, at that point, it was three soldiers killed in Niger. Can you talk us through the timetable of your release that information? And what part did the fact that a beacon was pinging during that time have to do with the release of the statement? And were you concerned that divulging information early might jeopardize a soldier?

 

Yes, first of all, that’s — we are at the — at the highest level of the U.S. government. The people that will answer those questions will be the people at the other end of the military pyramid. I’m sure they’re — the special forces group is conducting — I know they’re conducting an investigation. That investigation, of course, under the auspices of AFRICOM ultimately will go to the Pentagon.

 

I have read the same stories you have. I actually know a lot more than I’m letting on, so I’m — but I’m not going to tell you. There is an investigation being done, but, as I say, the men and women of our country that are serving all around the world — I mean, what the hell is my son doing back in the fight? He’s back in the fight because, working with Iraqi soldiers who are infinitely better than they were years ago, to take ISIS on directly, so that we don’t have to do it. Small numbers of Marines where he is, working alongside those guys. That’s why they’re out there, whether it’s Niger, Iraq, or whatever. We don’t want to send tens of thousands of American soldiers and Marines in particular to go fight.

 

I will take one more, but it’s going to be from someone who knows….

 

REPORTER QUESTION: General, when you talk about Niger, sir, what is your intelligence telling you about the Russian connection with them and what’s — the stories that are coming out now are….

 

That’s a question for NORTHCOM or for — not NORTHCOM — or — AFRICOM or DOD.

 

Thank you very much.

 

As I walk off the stage, understand there’s tens of thousands of American kids, mostly, doing the nation’s bidding all around the world. They don’t have to be in uniform. You know, when I was a kid, every man in my life was a veteran, World War II and Korea, and there was the draft. These young people today, they don’t do it for any other reason than their selfless — sense of selfless devotion to this great nation.

 

We don’t look down upon those of you that haven’t served. In fact, in a way we feel a little bit sorry, because you will never have experienced the wonderful joy you get in your heart when you do the kind of things our service men and women do, not for any other reason than they love this country.

 

So, just think about it. And I do appreciate your time.